Gait dysfunction is a common and relevant symptom in multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aimed to profile gait pathology in gait-impaired patients with MS using comprehensive 3D gait analysis and clinical walking tests. Thirty-seven patients with MS walked on the treadmill at their individual, sustainable speed while 20 healthy control subjects walked at all the different patient’s paces, allowing for comparisons independent of walking velocity. Kinematic analysis revealed pronounced restrictions in knee and ankle joint excursion, increased gait variability and asymmetry along with impaired dynamic stability in patients. The most discriminative single gait parameter, differentiating patients from controls with an accuracy of 83.3% (χ2 test; p = 0.0001), was reduced knee range of motion. Based on hierarchical cluster and principal component analysis, three principal pathological gait patterns were identified: a spastic-paretic, an ataxia-like, and an unstable gait. Follow-up assessments after 1 year indicated deterioration of walking function, particularly in patients with spastic-paretic gait patterns. Our findings suggest that impaired knee/ankle control is common in patients with MS. Personalised gait profiles and clustering algorithms may be promising tools for stratifying patients and to inform patient-tailored exercise programs. Responsive, objective outcome measures are important for monitoring disease progression and treatment effects in MS trials.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the CNS leading to demyelination of fibres and neuronal degeneration. MS is the leading cause of progressive functional impairment in young adults1. Three of four people with MS report reduced mobility due to impaired walking function at some point during their lifetime2,3. Walking impairment is perceived as the most restricting of symptoms by patients and constrains quality of life4,5,6.
Walking abnormalities in patients with MS are, nevertheless, poorly characterised. MS-related lesions may be widely disseminated throughout the brain and spinal cord, leading to a variety of gait abnormalities including ataxia, muscular weakness and spasticity-related signs7,8,9. Accordingly, there is no widely-accepted, typical gait pattern in MS unlike in other neurological disorders such as Parkinson’s disease or after unilateral cerebral stroke. Previous studies assessing gait deviations in patients with MS described reduced gait speed and step length7,9,10,11,12,13,14, reduced range of motion (ROM) of leg joints7,12,15,16, increased double-limb support7,10,17, and reduced dynamic stability17. In the aforementioned studies, however, patients and healthy controls walked at their respective self-selected speed, resulting in significant speed differences between groups. As the vast majority of locomotor parameters is strongly influenced by gait velocity18, slower walking speed in patients relative to controls is a major confounder, limiting the characterisation of MS-related gait pathophysiology9,19,20.
While several studies performed cross-sectional characterisation of walking dysfunctions in patients with MS, longitudinal assessments of the decline in walking performance in patients are rare21,22,23. However, monitoring of disease progression and walking dysfunction over time is important in the clinical setting, as it may help to adjust and optimise treatment strategies over the course of the disease24. Further, accumulative walking impairment is a hallmark of secondary progressive MS25 and changes in walking function based on detailed, reliable and quantitative assessments may serve as objective surrogate marker for conversion from relapsing-remitting to secondary-progressive MS. Comprehensive profiling of walking deficits, ranging from personalised gait signatures to objective cluster analysis of locomotor patterns, may help in monitoring therapies aimed at restoring walking function in patients and to identify sensitive endpoint measures for future trials in MS.
In this study, we characterised multiple sclerosis-related gait pathology, aimed at detecting and defining characteristic gait patterns in patients, and monitored deterioration of walking function over a period of one year.
Thirty-seven patients with MS (48.6 ± 10.3 years; 24 female) and 20 able-bodied, healthy controls (48.8 ± 10.1 years; 12 female) were included (Table 1). Eleven of 37 patients used walking aids at least occasionally during everyday life. Demographic data of patients were not different from healthy subjects (Table 1). Ambulatory performance in clinical walking tests including maximal walking speed in the T25FW and endurance in the 6MWT were significantly reduced in patients (T25FW: −72%; 6MWT: −44%; p < 0.0001 for both tests; two-tailed, unpaired t-test; Table 1).
Impact of walking speed on kinematic gait parameters
vmax50 was higher in healthy controls (1.08 ± 0.12 m/s) than in patients (0.64 ± 0.17 m/s; p < 0.0001, two-tailed, unpaired t-test; Supplementary Table S1). As previously reported by others18,20,26, we found that most kinematic gait parameters changed significantly with walking speed (Supplementary Table S1) demonstrating that differential walking speeds in patients and healthy controls confound the precise characterisation of walking deficits.
Characterisation of walking impairments in patients with MS
Patients showed a bilateral reduction in step length, which was associated with diminished ROM in the leg joints (Fig. 1). While ROM of the hip was preserved, significant reductions in the extent of movement were observed at the knee in particular, but also at the ankle joint. The more pronounced restriction of ROM at the knee and ankle joint of the weakest leg resulted in substantial left-right asymmetry. Mid-swing toe clearance in the strongest leg was increased, while the length of the wrist movement trajectory ipsilateral to the weakest leg was increased by more than 30% (Fig. 1). Most markers of dynamic instability such as step width (+49%), upper trunk movement (C7 trajectory: +17%) and the mediolateral (+25%) and anteroposterior (+43%) components of the centre of mass (COM) trajectory were increased in patients. Gait variability was strongly increased in patients while parameters of inter-limb coordination and stance phase duration only showed minor deviations in patients (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table S1).
We also investigated curve progressions of leg joint angular excursions over the entire gait cycle in controls (n = 20) and patients (n = 28) walking at a fixed speed of 2 km/h (Fig. 2). Hip angles of the patients’ weakest leg revealed a subtle shift of 5 degrees towards extension (Fig. 2C,D). Stick figures and angle plots demonstrated the reduced knee flexion in patients, mainly in the weakest leg (red) during swing phase (Fig. 2B–E). Angular excursion of the ankle joint showed a decrease in ankle dorsiflexion of the weakest leg during stance and swing phase (Fig. 2C,F). Analysis of leg end-point control (toe trajectory) revealed reduced and delayed toe clearance in patients during early swing phase (Fig. 2G,H), possibly due to the delayed initiation of knee flexion at pre-swing (Fig. 2E). Patients’ toe height was increased during mid-swing but reduced at heel-strike, the latter indicating impaired foot roll dynamics (Fig. 2F–H). Intra-limb joint coordination revealed similar cyclogram shapes in patients and controls indicating preserved temporal coupling of leg joints (Fig. 2I,J). Differences in the size of the cyclograms were mainly due to pathological changes in knee and ankle ROM.
Binary logistic regression analysis of kinematic data (Fig. 2) revealed that the best indicator of pathological gait was knee ROM of the weakest leg, achieving an accuracy of 83.3% in classifying patients with MS and healthy participants (χ2 test: p = 0.0001).
Individual gait signatures in patients with MS
Detailed gait profiles were generated for each patient to uncover individual deficits of walking function (Fig. 3). At each walking speed and parameter, the mean value ± 2 standard deviations measured in 20 control subjects was defined as the normal range (Fig. 3B). Values above or below this range were defined as pathological (Fig. 3A). The general distribution of the individual, pathological changes reflected the findings at the group-level (Figs 1, 2), for example, reduced step length and ROM of the more distal leg joints (Fig. 3A). Individual gait profiles also exposed a degree of heterogeneity in walking patterns, for instance, patients with pronounced reductions in distal leg joint excursions (014) or with a more unstable and variable walking pattern (023).
Classification of predominant walking patterns in MS
Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify the main patterns of walking dysfunction in PwMS. In a first step, the clustering algorithm was validated with a dataset consisting of 28 gait parameters assessed in 20 healthy participants and 28 patients walking at 2 km/h. The algorithm demonstrated 93.8% accuracy in distinguishing between patients and healthy controls. We then used the same algorithm to identify the prevailing gait patterns in the main cohort of patients (n = 37) walking at vmax50% and identified three different gait patterns (Fig. 4). PCA revealed group data clouds that were largely separated in the PC space, thus confirming differential walking patterns of the three identified cluster subgroups (Fig. 4A). Subgroup 1 was characterised by a particularly marked reduction in knee ROM and increased left-right knee asymmetry, but little impairment in dynamic stability and gait variability. Subgroup 2 revealed increased toe height at mid-swing with strongly enhanced gait variability, but with relatively well-preserved walking stability and symmetry. In contrast, subgroup 3 demonstrated pronounced dynamic instability with less-impaired joint excursions, in particular at the ankle (Fig. 4B). ReliefF feature selection analysis confirmed the main relative discriminants identified in the cluster and PC analysis (Fig. 4C).
The EDSS step was not different between the three cluster subgroups (Fig. 4D; 1-way ANOVA). However, pyramidal dysfunction scores were higher in subgroup 1 (Fig. 4D; pyramidal vs. cerebellar: p = 0.0115; pyramidal vs. sensory: p = 0.0016; 1-way ANOVA, repeated measures), whereas subgroup 2 showed a trend towards more pronounced cerebellar deficits. Walking performance in clinical walking tests and muscle strength of the different leg muscle groups (LEMMT) were not different between the three cluster subgroups (Supplementary Fig. S1; 1-way ANOVA; 2-way ANOVA, repeated measures, respectively). Proportions of concomitant MS therapies were not different between the cluster groups (p = 0.656; χ2 test).
Decline of waking function in patients with MS over 1 year
Twenty-nine of 37 patients were available for follow-up assessment, with eight patients declining further participation in the study. Demographics of the remaining patients were statistically not different from the baseline cohort and the healthy control group (two-tailed, unpaired t-test or Fisher’s exact test). Two participants experienced a clinically-apparent relapse between baseline and follow-up assessments, but none were in an active relapse phase during measurements. Proportions of concomitant MS therapies were not different between the cluster groups (p = 0.935; χ2 test). Only 2 of 29 patients revealed changes in concomitant MS treatment over 1 year. Kinematic analysis after 1 year revealed subtle but significant differences in walking patterns over time. Most gait parameters remained similar over 1 year. The only significant change in gait kinematics concerned an increasing impairment in knee joint excursions (knee ROM of strongest leg; p = 0.0129; two-tailed, paired t-test; Fig. 5A). Knee ROM worsened in 21 of 29 patients, both in the weakest and strongest leg, resulting in a bilateral reduction of ROM of around 6% over a period of 1 year (Fig. 5B). Clinical walking tests demonstrated significantly diminished walking endurance in patients after 1 year (−6.5% or −27.1 m in the 6MWT; p = 0.0027; two-tailed, paired t-test; Fig. 5D). Walking decline was pronounced in cluster subgroup 1 (T25FW: p = 0.0473; 6MWT: p = 0.0258; 2-way ANOVA, repeated measures; Supplementary Fig. S1). Interestingly, deterioration in knee ROM over time correlated with the decline in walking function in the T25FW (R = 0.421; p = 0.023; Pearson correlation) and 6MWT (R = 0.407; p = 0.029). The total EDSS step and its functional system subscores did not change over 1 year in our patient cohort (Fig. 5E; two-tailed, paired t-tests).
We prospectively characterised gait deficits in a cohort of 37 patients with MS applying sensitive, state-of-the-art 3D-kinematic gait analysis during treadmill walking and classified these patients into three different subgroups based on their walking pattern. We demonstrate mild, but significant, deterioration of walking function over a period of 1 year. Locomotor profiles were supplemented by neurological examination and clinical, overground walking tests.
In contrast to most cross-sectional comparative studies in this field of research7,12,17, the present study performed gait analysis beyond standard spatio-temporal walking parameters and generated full-body gait profiles based on a comprehensive set of upper and lower extremity and trunk kinematic parameters. Previous key studies describing gait abnormalities in patients with MS used participants’ freely-chosen walking speeds, resulting in paces that were typically reduced by 30–40% in patients compared to healthy controls7,9,11,12,16,27. We confirm that most walking parameters scale with walking speed and, therefore, conclude that accurate comparison of walking patterns between patients and healthy controls critically requires identical walking speeds. Thus, heterogeneous walking speeds in prior studies investigating walking deficits in MS likely explain some inconsistent results7,12,17. However, assessing gait while allowing patients to walk at their preferred speed is widespread due to its relevance to everyday life and the different demands placed on maintaining body control at slower vs. faster speeds28. To solve this problem, we compared each patient walking at a sustainable, moderate speed with 20 speed-matched controls for a more conclusive characterisation of gait impairments in MS.
In line with previous reports, we found reduced knee and ankle joint excursions in subjects with MS12,20. In contrast to earlier reports, however, we demonstrated that hip joint excursions and inter- and intra-limb coordination were barely affected in patients. Basic human and animal research suggests that these latter functions are primarily controlled by spinal interneuron networks known as central pattern generators (CPGs). The CPG networks are modulated by supraspinal and sensory drive but can also act independently of descending input29,30,31,32. In contrast, the strongly-affected distal limb control, including knee and ankle movements, as well as fine adjustments in foot positioning during walking to ensure dynamic stability, is thought to rely more heavily on the integrity of cortical, cerebellar and brainstem systems with their long descending and ascending myelinated fibre tracts33,34,35. The pattern of functional impairment described above may be explained by the common sites of MS lesions and resulting axonal loss and neurodegeneration within the CNS of PwMS: lesions are less pronounced in spinal grey than white matter and there seems to be a predilection for involvement of the long descending and ascending fibre tracts in comparison to spinal interneuron circuits such as CPGs36,37. These concepts should be further investigated using magnetic resonance imaging to assess correlations between lesioned CNS structures and the resulting functional impairments. The walking pattern of patients with MS described here is different from other neurological conditions such as that seen in Parkinson’s disease38 or patients with incomplete spinal cord injury, with the latter showing increased hip angular excursion in the context of unaltered knee angular excursion compared to controls walking at the same speed39.
Of all gait parameters evaluated in this study, impaired knee flexion was one of the main kinematic features of MS gait reaching an accuracy of 83% in differentiating gait patterns of patients from controls40. This is in line with previous studies reporting that impaired knee flexion is an important MS-associated gait characteristic and a valid predictor of walking function/gait speed in these patients41,42. Intriguingly, improved knee flexion as induced by pharmacological agents (fampridine40, baclofen43), or with functional electrical stimulation44 or physical exercise43,45 have previously been associated with enhanced walking function in PwMS. Restoring knee excursion thus seems to be a promising approach for future treatment options aiming at improving walking function in PwMS46.
Using cluster and principal component analyses, we identified three subgroups in our patient cohort walking with distinctive gait patterns. The first subgroup was characterised by a pronounced reduction of knee ROM (particularly during swing phase), resulting in increased left-right asymmetry, and also decreased excursions in the ankle joints, while other aspects of walking function were largely preserved in these patients. This walking pattern may correspond most closely to a “spastic-paretic” gait as reported for patients with spastic hemi-/paraparesis47,48, in line with the clinical finding that these patients primarily presented with signs of pyramidal dysfunction. To what extent the reduced knee ROM during swing phase is caused by paresis (e.g. hamstrings), increase of muscle tone (e.g. rectus femoris) or decreased push-off power in the ankle joint (e.g. gastrocnemius) remains to be investigated in future studies49. Reduction of knee flexion strength in the weakest leg as assessed with BMRC manual muscle testing was not more pronounced for this subgroup of patients compared to cluster groups 2 and 3 (p = 0.8458). However, the ability of such static manual muscle testing to reliably reflect muscle function during dynamic conditions is disputed50. Reliable quantification of spasticity remains difficult and, therefore, was not considered in the present study51,52,53,54.
The most striking characteristic of the second subgroup was increased spatial variability of leg and trunk movements accompanied by increased toe height during mid-swing phase. Strongly increased gait variability is a cardinal feature in patients with sensory or cerebellar gait ataxia55,56,57,58,59,60. However, there was only a trend towards a more impaired cerebellar function in the clinical examination in these patients with an ataxia-like walking pattern. Increased toe height may serve as compensatory strategy to prevent tripping or falling in these patients55,61.
The third subgroup was mainly characterised by increased dynamic instability as evident by a broad-based gait and excessive trunk movements, both in the mediolateral and anteroposterior direction. Interestingly, these patients demonstrated increased ROM in their ankle joints, which may be considered a strategy to counteract impaired balance control62 or, in contrast, may reflect deficient ankle joint stabilization during walking. Postural instability appears to be a non-specific symptom that can be found in many neurological disorders including stroke, cerebellar disorders, traumatic brain injury and Parkinson’s disease63,64,65,66,67.
Stratifying patients with MS into different “functional” subgroups based on objective and comprehensive gait assessments may open new avenues for therapeutic approaches and may be important in the targeting of patient-tailored rehabilitative training programs. Also, disease progression may be different between subgroups; in our cohort, patients in subgroup 1 demonstrated the most marked deterioration of walking performance in the clinical walking tests over 1 year.
MS is a progressive disease and persisting functional deficits are thought to be primarily related to neurodegenerative processes during the advanced stages of the disease68. While the EDSS did not capture neurological decline in our cohort of patients, clinical walking tests and kinematic gait analysis demonstrated sufficient responsiveness to detect worsening of walking function over 1 year. Whereas changes in the T25FW (+3.2% or +0.18 s) were small and did not reach the threshold for clinically meaningful changes (≥20% improvement)69,70, deterioration in the 6MWT (−6.5% or −27.1 m) were significant and reached the threshold that has previously been associated with clinically meaningful changes in PwMS (>21.6 m)71. Walking deterioration in our cohort was slightly more pronounced when compared to an earlier report examining walking function of 109 PwMS over 2 years23. Specifically, gait analysis revealed deterioration of one key parameter of gait dysfunction in MS over time, namely ROM of the knee joint. The clinical relevance of this kinematic finding was supported by a correlated decline in performance in clinical walking tests. These results highlight the value of clinical walking tests as outcome measures for monitoring walking function and disease progression over time while also confirming the role of kinematic gait analyses in identifying the mechanisms underlying gait disturbances in MS72.
One limitation of the present study is that only patients able to walk without assistance on the treadmill were included, as the use of handrails during treadmill walking has a profound effect on gait patterns and obscures walking impairments73. The present results may therefore not be applicable to the full spectrum of MS-related gait disorders. However, one third of our patients used walking aids at least occasionally in everyday life, indicating that our population also included patients with notable walking deficits. Our data were performed during treadmill walking and thus might not completely reflect spontaneous, everyday, overground walking. However, a substantial amount of literature supports the conclusion that the basic biomechanics of treadmill walking are highly similar to overground walking given sufficient acclimatisation to treadmill walking prior to gait analysis74,75,76,77. Moreover, the sample size of this study is limited (mainly for measurements assessing walking deterioration) and results need to be confirmed in larger cohort studies.
To conclude, gait disturbances in a cohort of mildly- to moderately-affected patients with MS are typified by decreased knee and ankle flexion, reduced dynamic stability and increased variability of movements. Subgroup analysis highlighted three dominant walking patterns in these patients: spastic-paretic gait, ataxia-like gait and unstable gait. While sensitive kinematic gait analysis and clinical walking tests detected deterioration of walking function over 1 year, EDSS scores did not reveal any change in our cohort. These insights may help to inform rehabilitative gait training in patients and to develop deficit-specific and patient-tailored exercise programs.
Thirty-seven patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting, primary- or secondary-progressive MS and clinical walking impairment were assessed at University Hospital Zurich between 2012 and 2013 (FAMPKIN study; clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01576354). For inclusion, patients had to be able to cover a distance of at least 50 meters within 6 minutes and to walk independently on an instrumented treadmill. Healthy control participants were measured within the framework of a two-centre study (University Hospital Zurich and University Hospital Balgrist). Both studies were approved by the Zurich cantonal ethics committee (KEK-2011-0445, KEK-2014-0004) and were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice. All subjects gave written, informed consent.
Study design and experimental procedures
All participants underwent a neurological examination including the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)78, the Lower Extremity Manual Muscle Test (LEMMT)79, the timed 25-foot walk (T25FW)80 and 6-minute walk test (6MWT)81. The maximal overground walking speed (vmax100%) was determined from the T25FW and 50% of this speed (vmax50%) was set as proportional walking speed on the treadmill for each patient. This approach allows direct comparison between patients with varying degrees of walking impairment and healthy controls and participants. The resulting treadmill speed is a moderate, sustainable walking velocity universally reported to be comfortable for treadmill walking by patients82. As such, we refer to vmax50% as a “sustainable” speed in this manuscript. Twenty healthy participants walked at different speeds ranging from 0.4 to 3.1 km/h (in intervals of 0.3 km/h) to match the individual walking speeds of all patients. All participants underwent an extensive acclimatisation protocol (≥15 minutes) to familiarise themselves with treadmill walking, as basic locomotor patterns on the treadmill approach spontaneous overground walking only in subjects well familiarised to treadmill walking74,77,83. Analysis of angular curves and cyclograms was conducted at a fixed speed of 2 km/h for all participants, as only an identical speed allows for a direct comparison/illustration of kinematic parameters in patients and controls. All other kinematic data of this paper are based on patients walking at their individual, sustainable speed (vmax50%) as described above. In follow-up assessments after 12 months, patients again underwent kinematic gait analysis (while walking at vmax50%) and clinical walking tests. All patients received treatment with prolonged-release fampridine within the framework of the FAMPKIN study40,84. However, treatment was discontinued 14 days before measurements.
Three-dimensional gait analysis was performed while participants walked barefoot for at least 30 seconds per trial on an instrumented treadmill (120 Hz, FDM-T, Zebris Medical GmbH, Germany) in a gait laboratory equipped with 14 infrared cameras recording via Nexus 2.2.3 (Vicon, Oxford, UK) motion capture software at a sampling rate of 200 Hz. Twenty-nine reflective markers (14 mm diameter) were placed on the skin based on the full-body gait model (Plug-in-Gait, Vicon, UK). Reflective markers were always placed by the same experienced physiotherapist and were visually inspected by a second team member, while the subject was in a standing position at full leg extension.
Gait parameters and data analysis
Data were processed in Nexus 2.2.3 and parameters were extracted using ProCalc (Vicon, Oxford, UK) analysis software. Gait events were defined by zero-crossings in toe marker velocity as described previously40,85. The strongest and weakest leg of each patient was defined based on the neurological examinations. We quantified 28 key gait parameters describing leg, trunk and arm movements to comprehensively characterise walking patterns in patients and healthy controls. Gait parameters were assessed per step cycle and were classified into different functional domains: (1) limb excursion: step length, toe height at mid-swing phase, 3D path of wrist trajectory; (2) range of motion: range of motion (ROM) of hip, knee and ankle joints (leg joint angles were calculated by a 3D vector-based approach described elsewhere86; (3) asymmetry: left-right asymmetry of leg joint excursion as assessed by a modified asymmetry index (ASI; see equation (1)) used elsewhere87,88:
(4) instability: step width, 3D path of cervical spine (C7) marker, centre of mass (COM) movements in mediolateral (ML) and anteroposterior (AP) directions; (5) inter-limb coordination: temporal left–right coordination of legs and arms as defined by phase dispersion89,90. In a subject walking perfectly in phase, heel strike of one limb occurs precisely at the mid-point of the contralateral step cycle, resulting in a phase dispersion of 0.5. (6) gait phases: stance phase, double-limb support (DLS); (7) variability: coefficient of variation (COV) of step length, step width and C7 marker trajectory.
Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (V23, SPSS Inc., CA, USA), Matlab (Mathworks, Inc., USA) and Graphpad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, Inc., CA, USA). The applied parametric tests are described in the respective figure legends. The level of significance was set at 0.05. All statistical tests were adjusted for multiple comparisons via post-hoc Bonferroni correction. Personalised gait profiles (Fig. 3) were developed based on contrasts relative to the distribution of specific gait parameters in healthy subjects91. Binary logistic regression (Wald forward stepwise) was used to discover the principal gait parameters distinguishing gait patterns of patients from healthy control participants.
Hierarchical cluster analysis was performed using Ward’s method, described as particularly robust in identifying functional patterns92. Variables were z-standardised and the Euclidian distance used as measure of dissimilarity93,94. The optimal number of clusters was determined by the R ratio, a measure of intra-cluster variability. A threshold value of R > 15 was applied, similar to approaches used previously to identify differential patterns94. Key attributes classifying the different clusters were extracted using the RefliefF algorithm95. Walking data generated from the clusters analysis were examined by principal component analysis (PCA). Principal components were calculated using eigenvalue decomposition on the centred and standardised dataset. The number of relevant principal components was determined with a Kaiser-Guttman stopping criteria.
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).
Alonso, A. & Hernan, M. A. Temporal trends in the incidence of multiple sclerosis: a systematic review. Neurology 71, 129–135, https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000316802.35974.34 (2008).
Hobart, J. C., Riazi, A., Lamping, D. L., Fitzpatrick, R. & Thompson, A. J. Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability: the 12-Item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Neurology 60, 31–36 (2003).
Kister, I. et al. Disability in multiple sclerosis: a reference for patients and clinicians. Neurology 80, 1018–1024, https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182872855 (2013).
Heesen, C. et al. Patient perception of bodily functions in multiple sclerosis: gait and visual function are the most valuable. Mult Scler 14, 988–991, https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458508088916 (2008).
Scheinberg, L. et al. Multiple sclerosis; earning a living. N Y State J Med 80, 1395–1400 (1980).
Sutliff, M. H. Contribution of impaired mobility to patient burden in multiple sclerosis. Curr Med Res Opin 26, 109–119, https://doi.org/10.1185/03007990903433528 (2010).
Benedetti, M. G. et al. Gait abnormalities in minimally impaired multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 5, 363–368, https://doi.org/10.1177/135245859900500510 (1999).
Ivanenko, Y. P., Poppele, R. E. & Lacquaniti, F. Distributed neural networks for controlling human locomotion: lessons from normal and SCI subjects. Brain Res Bull 78, 13–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.03.018 (2009).
Lizrova Preiningerova, J. et al. Spatial and temporal characteristics of gait as outcome measures in multiple sclerosis (EDSS 0 to 6.5). J Neuroeng Rehabil 12, 14, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0001-0 (2015).
Gehlsen, G. et al. Gait characteristics in multiple sclerosis: progressive changes and effects of exercise on parameters. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 67, 536–539 (1986).
Givon, U., Zeilig, G. & Achiron, A. Gait analysis in multiple sclerosis: characterization of temporal-spatial parameters using GAITRite functional ambulation system. Gait Posture 29, 138–142, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.07.011 (2009).
Kelleher, K. J., Spence, W., Solomonidis, S. & Apatsidis, D. The characterisation of gait patterns of people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil 32, 1242–1250, https://doi.org/10.3109/09638280903464497 (2010).
Rodgers, M. M. et al. Gait characteristics of individuals with multiple sclerosis before and after a 6-month aerobic training program. J Rehabil Res Dev 36, 183–188 (1999).
Socie, M. J., Motl, R. W., Pula, J. H., Sandroff, B. M. & Sosnoff, J. J. Gait variability and disability in multiple sclerosis. Gait Posture 38, 51–55, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.10.012 (2013).
Pau, M., Coghe, G., Corona, F., Marrosu, M. G. & Cocco, E. Effect of spasticity on kinematics of gait and muscular activation in people with Multiple Sclerosis. J Neurol Sci 358, 339–344, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2015.09.352 (2015).
Severini, G. et al. Evaluation of Clinical Gait Analysis parameters in patients affected by Multiple Sclerosis: Analysis of kinematics. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 45, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2017.04.001 (2017).
Martin, C. L. et al. Gait and balance impairment in early multiple sclerosis in the absence of clinical disability. Mult Scler 12, 620–628, https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458506070658 (2006).
Broom, L. et al. A translational approach to capture gait signatures of neurological disorders in mice and humans. Sci Rep 7, 3225, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03336-1 (2017).
Sosnoff, J. J., Sandroff, B. M. & Motl, R. W. Quantifying gait abnormalities in persons with multiple sclerosis with minimal disability. Gait Posture 36, 154–156, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.11.027 (2012).
van der Linden, M. L., Scott, S. M., Hooper, J. E., Cowan, P. & Mercer, T. H. Gait kinematics of people with multiple sclerosis and the acute application of functional electrical stimulation. Gait Posture 39, 1092–1096, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.01.016 (2014).
Cutter, G. R. et al. Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure. Brain 122(Pt 5), 871–882 (1999).
Fritz, N. E. et al. Longitudinal relationships among posturography and gait measures in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 84, 2048–2056, https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001580 (2015).
Paltamaa, J., Sarasoja, T., Leskinen, E., Wikstrom, J. & Malkia, E. Measuring deterioration in international classification of functioning domains of people with multiple sclerosis who are ambulatory. Phys Ther 88, 176–190, https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20070064 (2008).
Cadavid, D., Jurgensen, S. & Lee, S. Impact of natalizumab on ambulatory improvement in secondary progressive and disabled relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. PLoS One 8, e53297, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053297 (2013).
Feys, P., Bibby, B. M., Baert, I. & Dalgas, U. Walking capacity and ability are more impaired in progressive compared to relapsing type of multiple sclerosis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 51, 207–210 (2015).
Crenshaw, S. J., Royer, T. D., Richards, J. G. & Hudson, D. J. Gait variability in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 12, 613–619, https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458505070609 (2006).
Huisinga, J. M., Schmid, K. K., Filipi, M. L. & Stergiou, N. Gait mechanics are different between healthy controls and patients with multiple sclerosis. J Appl Biomech 29, 303–311 (2013).
Motl, R. W. et al. Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 and oxygen cost of walking. Gait Posture 31, 506–510, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.02.011 (2010).
Courtine, G. et al. Transformation of nonfunctional spinal circuits into functional states after the loss of brain input. Nat Neurosci 12, 1333–1342, https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2401 (2009).
Grillner, S. & Wallen, P. Central pattern generators for locomotion, with special reference to vertebrates. Annu Rev Neurosci 8, 233–261, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.08.030185.001313 (1985).
Grillner, S., Wallen, P., Saitoh, K., Kozlov, A. & Robertson, B. Neural bases of goal-directed locomotion in vertebrates–an overview. Brain Res Rev 57, 2–12, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.06.027 (2008).
McCrea, D. A. & Rybak, I. A. Organization of mammalian locomotor rhythm and pattern generation. Brain Res Rev 57, 134–146, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.08.006 (2008).
Armstrong, D. M. The supraspinal control of mammalian locomotion. J Physiol 405, 1–37 (1988).
Barthelemy, D., Grey, M. J., Nielsen, J. B. & Bouyer, L. Involvement of the corticospinal tract in the control of human gait. Prog Brain Res 192, 181–197, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53355-5.00012-9 (2011).
Takakusaki, K. Neurophysiology of gait: from the spinal cord to the frontal lobe. Mov Disord 28, 1483–1491, https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25669 (2013).
Bo, L. The histopathology of grey matter demyelination in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand Suppl, 51-57, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0404.2009.01216.x (2009).
Droby, A. et al. The impact of isolated lesions on white-matter fiber tracts in multiple sclerosis patients. Neuroimage Clin 8, 110–116, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.03.003 (2015).
Urquhart, D. M., Morris, M. E. & Iansek, R. Gait consistency over a 7-day interval in people with Parkinson’s disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 80, 696–701 (1999).
Awai, L., Bolliger, M., Ferguson, A. R., Courtine, G. & Curt, A. Influence of Spinal Cord Integrity on Gait Control in Human Spinal Cord Injury. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 30, 562–572, https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968315600524 (2016).
Zorner, B. et al. Prolonged-release fampridine in multiple sclerosis: Improved ambulation effected by changes in walking pattern. Mult Scler 22, 1463–1475, https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458515622695 (2016).
Thoumie, P., Lamotte, D., Cantalloube, S., Faucher, M. & Amarenco, G. Motor determinants of gait in 100 ambulatory patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 11, 485–491, https://doi.org/10.1191/1352458505ms1176oa (2005).
Broekmans, T. et al. The relationship between upper leg muscle strength and walking capacity in persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 19, 112–119, https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458512444497 (2013).
Brar, S. P., Smith, M. B., Nelson, L. M. & Franklin, G. M. & Cobble, N. D. Evaluation of treatment protocols on minimal to moderate spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 72, 186–189 (1991).
Ratchford, J. N. et al. A pilot study of functional electrical stimulation cycling in progressive multiple sclerosis. NeuroRehabilitation 27, 121–128, https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-2010-0588 (2010).
Pau, M. et al. Quantitative assessment of the effects of 6 months of adapted physical activity on gait in people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil 40, 144–151, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1244291 (2018).
Guner, S., Haghari, S., Inanici, F., Alsancak, S. & Aytekin, G. Knee muscle strength in multiple sclerosis: relationship with gait characteristics. J Phys Ther Sci 27, 809–813, https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.27.809 (2015).
Hutin, E. et al. Lower limb coordination patterns in hemiparetic gait: factors of knee flexion impairment. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 26, 304–311, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2010.10.007 (2011).
Serrao, M. et al. Gait Patterns in Patients with Hereditary Spastic Paraparesis. PLoS One 11, e0164623, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164623 (2016).
Campanini, I., Merlo, A. & Damiano, B. A method to differentiate the causes of stiff-knee gait in stroke patients. Gait Posture 38, 165–169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.05.003 (2013).
Fosang, A. & Baker, R. A method for comparing manual muscle strength measurements with joint moments during walking. Gait Posture 24, 406–411, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2005.09.015 (2006).
Sehgal, N. & McGuire, J. R. Beyond Ashworth. Electrophysiologic quantification of spasticity. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 9, 949–979 ix (1998).
Sheean, G. & McGuire, J. R. Spastic hypertonia and movement disorders: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and quantification. PM R 1, 827–833, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.08.002 (2009).
Damiano, D. L. et al. What does the Ashworth scale really measure and are instrumented measures more valid and precise? Dev Med Child Neurol 44, 112–118 (2002).
Chino, N. et al. Measurement of ankle plantar flexor spasticity following stroke: Assessment of a new quantitative tool. J Rehabil Med 47, 753–755, https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1991 (2015).
Schniepp, R., Mohwald, K. & Wuehr, M. Gait ataxia in humans: vestibular and cerebellar control of dynamic stability. J Neurol, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8482-3 (2017).
Schniepp, R. et al. Clinical and neurophysiological risk factors for falls in patients with bilateral vestibulopathy. J Neurol 264, 277–283, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8342-6 (2017).
Palliyath, S., Hallett, M., Thomas, S. L. & Lebiedowska, M. K. Gait in patients with cerebellar ataxia. Mov Disord 13, 958–964, https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.870130616 (1998).
Ilg, W. & Timmann, D. Gait ataxia–specific cerebellar influences and their rehabilitation. Mov Disord 28, 1566–1575, https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.25558 (2013).
Serrao, M. et al. Gait pattern in inherited cerebellar ataxias. Cerebellum 11, 194–211, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-011-0296-8 (2012).
Wuehr, M., Schniepp, R., Ilmberger, J., Brandt, T. & Jahn, K. Speed-dependent temporospatial gait variability and long-range correlations in cerebellar ataxia. Gait Posture 37, 214–218, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.07.003 (2013).
MacLellan, M. J., Dupre, N. & McFadyen, B. J. Increased obstacle clearance in people with ARCA-1 results in part from voluntary coordination changes between the thigh and shank segments. Cerebellum 10, 732–744, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-011-0283-0 (2011).
Boonstra, T. A., Schouten, A. C. & van der Kooij, H. Identification of the contribution of the ankle and hip joints to multi-segmental balance control. J Neuroeng Rehabil 10, 23, https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-10-23 (2013).
Dean, J. C. & Kautz, S. A. Foot placement control and gait instability among people with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 52, 577–590, https://doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2014.09.0207 (2015).
Kao, P. C., Dingwell, J. B., Higginson, J. S. & Binder-Macleod, S. Dynamic instability during post-stroke hemiparetic walking. Gait Posture 40, 457–463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.05.014 (2014).
Pan, T., Liao, K., Roenigk, K., Daly, J. J. & Walker, M. F. Static and dynamic postural stability in veterans with combat-related mild traumatic brain injury. Gait Posture 42, 550–557, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.08.012 (2015).
Schniepp, R. et al. The interrelationship between disease severity, dynamic stability, and falls in cerebellar ataxia. J Neurol 263, 1409–1417, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8142-z (2016).
Stegemoller, E. L. et al. Postural instability and gait impairment during obstacle crossing in Parkinson’s disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93, 703–709, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.004 (2012).
Trapp, B. D. & Nave, K. A. Multiple sclerosis: an immune or neurodegenerative disorder? Annu Rev Neurosci 31, 247–269, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094313 (2008).
Schwid, S. R., Goodman, A. D., McDermott, M. P., Bever, C. F. & Cook, S. D. Quantitative functional measures in MS: what is a reliable change? Neurology 58, 1294–1296 (2002).
Hobart, J., Blight, A. R., Goodman, A., Lynn, F. & Putzki, N. Timed 25-foot walk: direct evidence that improving 20% or greater is clinically meaningful in MS. Neurology 80, 1509–1517, https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828cf7f3 (2013).
Baert, I. et al. Responsiveness and clinically meaningful improvement, according to disability level, of five walking measures after rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a European multicenter study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 28, 621–631, https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314521010 (2014).
Cameron, M. H. & Wagner, J. M. Gait abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis, evaluation, and advances in treatment. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 11, 507–515, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11910-011-0214-y (2011).
Buurke, J. H., Hermens, H. J., Erren-Wolters, C. V. & Nene, A. V. The effect of walking aids on muscle activation patterns during walking in stroke patients. Gait Posture 22, 164–170, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.09.003 (2005).
Riley, P. O., Paolini, G., Della Croce, U., Paylo, K. W. & Kerrigan, D. C. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects. Gait Posture 26, 17–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.07.003 (2007).
Parvataneni, K., Ploeg, L., Olney, S. J. & Brouwer, B. Kinematic, kinetic and metabolic parameters of treadmill versus overground walking in healthy older adults. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 24, 95–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.07.002 (2009).
Watt, J. R. et al. A three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy elderly subjects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 25, 444–449, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.09.002 (2010).
Schellenbach, M., Lovden, M., Verrel, J., Kruger, A. & Lindenberger, U. Adult age differences in familiarization to treadmill walking within virtual environments. Gait Posture 31, 295–299, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.11.008 (2010).
Kurtzke, J. F. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33, 1444–1452 (1983).
Cuthbert, S. C. & Goodheart, G. J. Jr. On the reliability and validity of manual muscle testing: a literature review. Chiropr Osteopat 15, 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-1340-15-4 (2007).
Motl, R. W. et al. Validity of the timed 25-foot walk as an ambulatory performance outcome measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 23, 704–710, https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458517690823 (2017).
Goldman, M. D., Marrie, R. A. & Cohen, J. A. Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls. Mult Scler 14, 383–390, https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458507082607 (2008).
Bohannon, R. W. Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. Age Ageing 26, 15–19 (1997).
Lee, S. J. & Hidler, J. Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals. J Appl Physiol (1985) 104, 747–755, https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01380.2006 (2008).
Filli, L. et al. Monitoring long-term efficacy of fampridine in gait-impaired patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 88, 832–841, https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000003656 (2017).
Zeni, J. A. Jr, Richards, J. G. & Higginson, J. S. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data. Gait Posture 27, 710–714, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.07.007 (2008).
Schmidt, K. et al. The Myosuit: Bi-articular Anti-gravity Exosuit That Reduces Hip Extensor Activity in Sitting Transfers. Front Neurorobot 11, 57, https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbot.2017.00057 (2017).
Plate, A. et al. Normative data for arm swing asymmetry: how (a)symmetrical are we? Gait Posture 41, 13–18, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.07.011 (2015).
Killeen, T. et al. Increasing cognitive load attenuates right arm swing in healthy human walking. R Soc Open Sci 4, 160993, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160993 (2017).
Kloos, A. D., Fisher, L. C., Detloff, M. R., Hassenzahl, D. L. & Basso, D. M. Stepwise motor and all-or-none sensory recovery is associated with nonlinear sparing after incremental spinal cord injury in rats. Exp Neurol 191, 251–265, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2004.09.016 (2005).
Filli, L., Zorner, B., Weinmann, O. & Schwab, M. E. Motor deficits and recovery in rats with unilateral spinal cord hemisection mimic the Brown-Sequard syndrome. Brain 134, 2261–2273, https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr167 (2011).
Pradhan, C. et al. Automated classification of neurological disorders of gait using spatio-temporal gait parameters. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 25, 413–422, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.01.004 (2015).
Breckenridge, J. N. V. C. Analysis: Consistent Replication and Symmetry. Multivariate Behav Res 35, 261–285, https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327906MBR3502_5 (2000).
Manca, M. et al. Gait patterns in hemiplegic patients with equinus foot deformity. Biomed Res Int 2014, 939316, https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/939316 (2014).
Watelain, E., Barbier, F., Allard, P., Thevenon, A. & Angue, J. C. Gait pattern classification of healthy elderly men based on biomechanical data. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81, 579–586 (2000).
Popp, W. L. et al. A novel algorithm for detecting active propulsion in wheelchair users following spinal cord injury. Med Eng Phys 38, 267–274, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2015.12.011 (2016).
We thank all patients and healthy volunteers participating in this study and the institutions supporting the trial. The study was partially funded by the Swiss MS Society, the Betty and David Koetser Foundation, Biogen (an investigator-initiated trial grant) and the Clinical Research Priority Program (CRPP) “NeuroRehab” of the University of Zurich. All researchers involved in the study and their analyses were independent from the funders.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Filli, L., Sutter, T., Easthope, C.S. et al. Profiling walking dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: characterisation, classification and progression over time. Sci Rep 8, 4984 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22676-0
This article is cited by
Artificial Neural Network-Based Activities Classification, Gait Phase Estimation, and Prediction
Annals of Biomedical Engineering (2023)
Opportunities and challenges in the development of exoskeletons for locomotor assistance
Nature Biomedical Engineering (2022)
Longitudinal relationships between disability and gait characteristics in people with MS
Scientific Reports (2022)
Objectively assessed physiological, physical, and cognitive function along with patient-reported outcomes during the first 2 years of Alemtuzumab treatment in multiple sclerosis: a prospective observational study
Journal of Neurology (2022)
Detection of gait variations by using artificial neural networks
Biomedical Engineering Letters (2022)
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.