Abstract
PIK3CA mutations are seemingly the most common driver mutations in breast cancer with H1047R and E545K being the most common of these, accounting together for around 60% of all PIK3CA mutations and have promising therapeutic implications. Given the low sensitivity and the high cost of current genotyping methods we sought to develop fast, simple and inexpensive assays for PIK3CA H1047R and E545K mutation screening in clinical material. The methods we describe are based on a real-time PCR including a mutation specific primer combined with a non-productive oligonucleotide which inhibits wild-type amplification and a parallel internal control reaction. We demonstrate consistent detection of PIK3CA H1047R mutant DNA in genomic DNA extracted from frozen breast cancer biopsies, FFPE material or cancer cell lines with a detection sensitivity of approximately 5% mutant allele fraction and validate these results using both Sanger sequencing and deep next generation sequencing methods. The detection sensitivity for PIK3CA E545K mutation was approximately 10%. We propose these methods as simple, fast and inexpensive diagnostic tools to determine PIK3CA mutation status.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase (PI3K) signalling pathway is a key regulator of many essential cellular functions including survival, proliferation and metabolism1. It is one of the most commonly altered signal transduction pathways in human cancers2,3 and its aberrant activation also causes mosaic hyper-proliferative syndromes4,5. The activation of PI3K signalling observed in cancer and other pathologies appears to be a consequence of mutations in at least one component of the pathway6, including the PI3K catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA). The identified PIK3CA mutations are dominated by a small number of recurrent mutations located within two major hotspots: E542K and E545K in the helical domain (encoded within exon 9) and H1047R in the kinase domain (encoded within exon 20). These missense mutations each produce a constitutively active form of the PI3K protein that promotes enhanced downstream signalling contributing to cellular transformation7,8.
Somatic PIK3CA mutations are present in approximately 40% of all breast cancer tumours6,9,10 with a higher frequency in estrogen receptor (ER) positive subtypes11. Despite its potential predictive value, the prognostic and therapeutic implications of genetic alterations in the PI3K pathway still remain unclear12,13. PIK3CA mutations appear to be associated overall with a better clinical outcome mainly due to their correlation with ER expression14 which is considered a good prognostic feature itself. However, activating mutations in the PIK3CA gene have also been proposed as indicative of a poor outcome for Trastuzumab-based therapies in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer models15,16.
Subsets of patients with different PIK3CA mutations might present distinct outcomes or show differential sensitivity to a specific treatment given the distinct biochemical properties of these mutant enzymes17. In the COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database, PIK3CA H1047R and E545K represent the two most commonly identified PIK3CA mutations in human tumours, accounting for 55% and 24% respectively of all PIK3CA mutations detected in breast cancer and 38% and 27% respectively of PIK3CA mutations in all cancers. In laboratory experiments, activating PIK3CA point mutation has been presented as a strong driver of tumour development by inducing multipotency18 and cell transformation in the mammary gland and being considered an early event in oncogenesis19. Several studies suggest that patients harbouring a PIK3CAmutation benefit from PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway inhibitors20,21. Conversely, PIK3CA mutation has been proposed as a negative predictive biomarker to anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients22. Consequently, addressing PIK3CA mutation status in cancer patients may provide a more accurate molecular diagnosis enabling tailored therapeutic approaches.
Mutation status in tumours has been often assessed by Sanger DNA sequencing from tissue samples although this method is often limited by its poor sensitivity (~20%) for low abundance mutations. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies have enabled high throughput analysis of tumour DNA samples with greatly improved sensitivity23. However, due to the complexity and high cost of NGS techniques, their routine implementation into widespread clinical practice seems some way off, particularly in healthcare settings with more limited resources.
Alternative approaches based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) principle such as Digital Droplet PCR (ddPCR) and its variant BEAMing or High Resolution Melting Analysis and Amplification-refractory mutation system (ARMS), among others, have been described for the detection of mutant variants in clinical samples24,25,26. Although some of these methods have already been validated in clinical contexts27,28, their greater complexity and expense challenge their widespread uptake in clinical laboratories. Therefore there remains a need for cheaper and simpler screening methods that can efficiently detect actionable genetic variants in solid tumours.
Allele-specific PCR strategies, using primers specific for mutant sequences, have been widely used in the clinical detection of DNA sequence variants29,30. A method, termed INTPLEX, was recently described to detect oncogenic KRAS and BRAF mutations in plasma samples31. Here we use this approach to detect PIK3CA H1047R and E545K point mutations with a method based on standard Sybr Green real-time PCR. Given the simplicity of the technique, this analysis could be potentially performed in any lab with real-time PCR capability and its principle could be easily adapted to other clinically relevant point mutations.
Results
Method design
We sought to develop an assay that could accurately test the PIK3CA H1047R and E545K mutation status in human-derived samples. Our quantitative PCR (qPCR) approach involves the use of a set of primers specifically designed to target the mutant sequence while minimizing the amplification of mismatched products derived from the wild-type allele (Fig. 1 and Table 1). The antisense oligonucleotide targeting the mutant-specific sequence has the variant base located at its 3′ end in order to minimize cross-amplification of the wild-type template. The use of a non-productive phosphate-modified oligonucleotide complementary to the wild-type sequence is intended to supress the amplification of the wild-type allele. It has been designed with the variant base located approximately in the middle of this blocking primer sequence and to partially overlap with the mutant-specific oligonucleotide to ensure high specificity. Each assay also includes the amplification of a non-mutated internal control sequence in a separate reaction.
Allele specificity
To evaluate the specificity of the assay we used plasmids containing either the human wild-type PIK3CA cDNA (PIK3CA WT) or the variant cDNA sequence (PIK3CA H1047R or PIK3CA E545K). Each allele-specific qPCR reaction was carried out using 1 × 106 copies of either wild-type or mutant plasmid DNA templates. A shift in the amplification curve of the mutant reaction was observed in the wild-type template compared to the mutant thus indicating the degree of suppression of mismatched amplification (Fig. 2A) and suppression was larger when the wild-type blocking primer was included (Figure S1). Although, as expected, both mutant selective qPCR reactions did give a product using wild-type template, the mutant allele amplification reaction showed approximately an 8-fold more efficient product formation from the H1047R mutant template compared to the wild-type plasmid (Fig. 2B) and 5-fold increase in mutant product formation for the E545K reaction (Fig. 2C). The ΔCt values of a representative assay for each mutation detection reactions are provided in Fig. 2D.
Assay performance in human cell lines
In order to determine the efficiency of each primer set we used genomic DNA extracted from cell lines containing either a PIK3CA H1047R or E545K mutation which was then serially diluted 5 times. As shown in Fig. 3A,B and Figure S2A, the efficiency of the reactions was always close to 100% thus highlighting the suitability of the primer sets and the accuracy of the reactions. The limit of detection in the H1047R reaction was as low as 56 pg while it was approximately 300 pg in the E545K reaction.
To further study the sensitivity of the method in conditions that resemble tumour heterogeneity, we diluted genomic DNA extracted from cell lines containing each mutation into increasing concentrations of wild-type human genomic DNA whilst maintaining a total of 5000 template genomic copies and we then subjected the samples to qPCR analysis. Our results show decreased mutant-allele amplification with decreasing mutant DNA to wild-type ratios (Fig. 3C). The H1047R assay exhibited a detection limit of 5% of diluted mutant content in the sample, when performed in triplicate with a significance threshold of p < 0.05 whereas the E545K assay was less sensitive with a threshold of 10% (Figure S2B) when using a total of 2000 copies per reaction.
We next explored the ability of the method to evaluate the presence of the PIK3CA H1047R mutation in genomic DNA derived from five cell lines with known mutation status. As shown in Fig. 3D, samples harbouring the mutation (genomic DNA obtained from BT20, HCT-116 and T47D cells) displayed a significantly increased relative amplification of the mutant allele compared to a control human genomic DNA sample. However, the samples derived from the cell lines known to have a wild-type genotype (HEK-293 and U87MG) showed amplification values similar to those obtained for control samples. This method could therefore effectively address the mutation status in all cell lines tested. The E545K specific assay was also able to detect this mutation in DNA from MCF-7 and MDA-MB-2361 cells which are recognised to carry this mutation (Figure S2C).
Analysis of PIK3CA H1047R mutation status in breast cancer biopsy material
We next wanted to assess the performance of the H1047R assay in DNA samples obtained from frozen core biopsies and Formalin-Fixed Paraffin-Embedded (FFPE) samples from breast cancer patients. The clinical characteristics of the patients are shown in Supplementary Table 1. A total of 22 samples with unknown PIK3CA H1047R status were subjected to the analysis (Fig. 4A). Samples were considered positive for the mutation when the relative amplification of the mutant allele differed significantly from the wild-type human genomic DNA control. A pool of genomic DNA derived from cell lines harbouring the PIK3CA H1047R mutation was used as a positive control in all these assays. The test identified two samples (patients B12 and B16) harbouring the H1047R mutation while the rest of the samples appeared negative (n = 22).
Genomic DNA extraction from FPPE samples typically yields fragmented DNA that is often considered unsuitable for its use in many downstream applications. In order to assess the performance of our assay in FFPE material, genomic DNA was extracted from FFPE blocks from 8 different patients (including B12 and B16) and samples were then subjected to PIK3CA H1047R mutation analysis (Fig. 4B). Mutation status assignments were made based on the relative mutant amplification compared to a control human genomic DNA sample. A positive control containing a pool of DNA derived from 3 cell lines harbouring the mutation was also included in the assay. The analysis again showed a significantly increased relative amplification of the mutant allele in FFPE samples from patients B12 and B16 compared to the non-mutated human genomic DNA control, consistent with the presence of PIK3CA H1047R mutation in these patients. The rest of the samples tested showed a wild-type genotype. To validate the data obtained using our qPCR approach in clinical samples, we were able to subject 15 of these samples to targeted deep sequencing (TruSeq Amplicon Cancer Panel, Illumina) giving a measured allele frequency (AF) for the PIK3CA H1047R mutation in each tumour and white blood cell reference sample (Fig. 4C and Supplementary Table 2). These data confirm the presence of the PIK3CA H1047R A > G substitution in the two patients that were called positive using our PCR method (B12 and B16). Although the mutation was not detected above 5% AF in other samples, sample B23 appeared to carry the mutation very close to this level (AF = 4.8%) and this mutant genotype had not been detected by our qPCR method. Finally, the presence of PIK3CA H1047R mutant DNA was also analysed by PCR amplicon Sanger sequencing in samples B12 and B16, as well as the wild-type genotype of two samples that had been called negative for the mutation (B15 and B20) in our qPCR assay (Fig. 4D). In these data, an evident but small signal corresponding to the H1047R mutation was observed with samples B12 and B16 which was absent with samples B15 and B20.
Discussion
Here we describe a simple allele-specific quantitative PCR (qPCR) method to detect the common oncogenic PIK3CA H1047R and E545K mutations in human genomic DNA. The assays reported herein rely on the combined use of a set of mutant allele-specific primers with a non-productive phosphate-modified oligonucleotide complementary to the wild-type sequence that blocks the wild-type allele amplification thus achieving high specificity. A separate internal control reaction allows the quantification of the qPCR product.
In reference samples this approach is sensitive enough to detect down to 5% H1047R mutant DNA against a background of 95% wild-type sequences and down to 10% mutant DNA for the E545K mutation. The method successfully identified two PIK3CA H1047R positive patient samples from a test set of available tumour biopsy DNA samples purified either from fresh frozen tumour tissue or from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) material. Of a cohort of 22 breast cancer samples, genomic DNA from fresh frozen core biopsies was prepared from all 22 samples and subjected to the qPCR mutation detection assay, 15 of these samples were subjected to amplicon deep sequencing, and 4 of them were additionally genotyped by Sanger sequencing. Furthermore, for 8 of the tumours DNA was extracted from FFPE material and tested using the qPCR assay. The data obtained were coherent and self-consistent. Using the deep sequencing data as a reference, the qPCR assay identified, using DNA from both fresh frozen and FFPE material, two positive tumours (B12 and B16). These two positive samples had observed mutant allele fractions in the Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) data of 26.1% and 22.1% respectively. Notably, the assay did not detect a tumour (B23) in which NGS analysis detected a substantial number of mutant bases: 213 mutant in 4426 total reads giving a mutant allele fraction (AF) of 4.8%, which is below the limit of detection of this method. Overall, this H1047R detection method achieved high sensitivity detecting 67% of mutant samples (100% of samples >5% AF) and gave no false positives (a selectivity of 100%) in a cohort of 22 patients. The data obtained with the qPCR assay were far clearer than that obtained using targeted Sanger sequencing (Fig. 4). The PCR assay to detect the PIK3CA E545K mutation had lower sensitivity (>10% mutant AF) and was not validated using clinical samples.
PIK3CA is probably the most commonly mutated gene found in human breast cancers and is also mutated in many other solid cancer types. The increasing number of PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors that are currently under development for breast cancer and other malignancies suggest the potential value of PIK3CA genotyping as a tool for guiding personalized therapies, although its clinical significance still remains incompletely understood32. Targeted screening for and detection of these mutations is routinely achieved using several approaches, which either have low sensitivity (targeted Sanger sequencing) or are expensive and/or complex33,34. In the latter categories, non-standard PCR detection methods have been used and clinically validated by a few laboratories [32, 33], proprietary detection kits are commercially available, and targeted NGS and digital droplet PCR can give excellent high sensitivity data but are individually costly and also rely on high cost facilities, trained personnel and often have long turnaround times. The ability of our assay to detect PIK3CA H1047R mutations not only in frozen biopsy tissue but also in FFPE tissue specimens is of particular interest, given the value of archived FFPE blocks and the low quality DNA typically obtained from these samples that sometimes limits their use for genomic analysis in downstream applications. We aim that our qPCR based method can be applied at low cost and quick turnaround times in locations lacking expensive genomics facilities. It should also give more sensitive robust data than targeted Sanger sequencing without the need of proprietary reagents and workflows other than those normally used for Sybr Green real-time qPCR. This will improve our knowledge about the prognostic and therapeutic implications of these mutations and further facilitate the development of more individualized PIK3CA targeted therapies.
Material and Methods
Study population, recruitment and sample collection
Matching fresh frozen core biopsies, blood samples and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from 22 female patients with a newly diagnosed breast cancer were collected by the Oncology team of the Western General Hospital in Edinburgh, UK. The study was approved by the Scotland Research Ethics Committee (15/ES/0094). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Blood samples were collected in EDTA tubes pre-operatively from patients before receiving any cancer treatment. Blood samples were centrifuged for 10 minutes at 4000 rpm for plasma separation and white blood cell isolation. Tumour tissue, plasma and white blood cells samples were snap frozen and stored at −80 °C until use.
Plasmids
pBabe puro HA PIK3CA H1047R containing the mutant cDNA sequence of the human PIK3CA gene was from Jean Zhao (Addgene plasmid #12524). PF-Dual-6His-PI3Kalpha/p85 plasmid containing the wild-type cDNA sequence of the human PIK3CA gene and PF-Dual-6His-PI3Kalpha E545K plasmid containing the E545K mutation were kindly provided by James Hastie and Hilary McLaughlin (DU1468 and DU12812 plasmids, respectively, Division of Signal Transduction Therapy, University of Dundee). Plasmids were purified using the QIAfilter Plasmid Maxi kit (Qiagen) and DNA concentration was measured spectrophotometrically (PolarStar Omega, BMG Labtech). Both plasmids were subjected to sequencing for validation.
Cell lines
The human BT20, HCT-116, T47D, HEK293, MCF-7 and MDA MB-361 and U87MG cancer cells (European Collection of Authenticated Cell Cultures) were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (Life Technologies) containing 10% foetal bovine serum (Invitrogen) and 100 units/ml penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich). Cells were cultured at 37 °C under a 5% CO2 atmosphere. BT20, HCT-116, T47D cells were known to possess a heterozygous PIK3CA H1047R mutation while MCF-7 and MDA MB-361 were known to possess a heterozygous PIK3CA E545K mutation. Cell lines HEK293 and U87MG were known to be wild-type for the PIK3CA gene.
Genomic DNA extraction
Tumour Genomic DNA was extracted from fresh frozen core biopsies (25 mg) retrieved from the tumour rich area using the QIAmp DNA mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions in an elution volume of 100 µl. The extraction of genomic DNA from cell lines in culture was performed using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. FFPE blocks were cut in 10 µm sections and genomic DNA was extracted from 4 sections per patient using QIAmp DNA FFPE Tissue kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. DNA samples were eluted in 30 µl Tris buffer pH 8. RNase A (Qiagen) was used in all FFPE-derived samples. Genomic DNA was purified from white blood cells after isolation from blood using the QIAamp DNA Blood Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions in an elution volume of 200 µl. DNA concentration was determined by spectrophotometry (PolarStar Omega, BMG Labtech). All DNA samples were aliquoted and stored at −80 °C until use.
PIK3CA H1047R and E545K mutation analysis by real-time quantitative PCR
Allele-specific amplification targeting either the PIK3CA H1047R or PIK3CA E545K mutations in human genomic DNA samples were performed in a Step One Plus real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems) as follows. Primer3 software version 0.4.0 was used to assist primer design. All primers were purchased from Eurofins Genomics. A list of the oligonucleotide primers used for each assay is provided in Table 1. Reactions to amplify specifically the mutant sequence were carried out in triplicates in a reaction volume of 12.5 µl using 6.25 µl of 2x Power Sybr Green master mix (Life Technologies), 1.25 µl of each amplification primer (final concentrations 100 nM of forward and reverse primers, 200 nM of the blocking primer) and 2.5 µl of purified genomic template DNA (10 ng). Reactions targeting the internal control sequence were performed according to the same protocol using the same primer final concentrations but adding 1.25 µl of nucleic acid-free water (Thermo Fisher Scientific) instead of the blocking primer. Cycling conditions consisted on an initial denaturation step of 95 °C for 10 minutes followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C denaturation for 15 seconds and an annealing/extension step of 1 min at 60 °C. Post amplification melting curve analysis were performed for each reaction product to confirm the absence of non-specific amplification products. Changes in fold amplification were analysed by the comparative ΔΔCt method. Cycle threshold (Ct) values were recorded for each allele-specific and internal control assay and corresponding 2−ΔΔCt values were calculated. Samples were considered to carry the mutation when the relative amplification of the mutant allele was statistically significant with respect to a control sample. All the samples were compared to genomic DNA (Bioline) derived from human placenta as a wild-type control. A pool of DNA derived from 3 different cell lines carrying PIK3CA H1047R mutation (BT20, HCT-116 and T47D) was used as a positive control for all PIK3CA H1047R mutation status analysis.
Next-Generation Sequencing
The PIK3CA H1047R status of clinical samples was verified by Next-Generation Sequencing analysis using the Illumina Tru-Seq Amplicon Cancer Panel. Genomic DNA extracted from frozen core biopsies was processed at the Edinburgh Genomics facility according to the manufacturer’s instructions and sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq using 250 base paired-end sequencing strategy (version 2 chemistry). Sequence data was trimmed for primer and low quality sequences using cutadapt (version 1.8.3); and aligned to the reference genome (GrcH37/hg19 assembly) using bwa mem (version 0.7.13). Pairs of normal and tumor samples were provided to MuTect pipeline (version 1.1.7) along with dbSNP (hg19) and COSMIC (version 80) variant files. All candidate mutations that were not rejected as somatic variants by MuTect were retained. VCFtool version 0.1.13 was used to derive the allele frequency at each site.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc). Significant differences between groups were assessed using an unpaired parametric two-tailed t test assuming equal standard deviations. One-way ANOVA was used in experiments with more than one group to compare to control. Samples were considered statistically significant when P value was lower than 0.05.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Change history
06 August 2021
A Correction to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95597-0
References
Vanhaesebroeck, B., Stephens, L. & Hawkins, P. PI3K signalling: the path to discovery and understanding. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 195–203 (2012).
Karakas, B., Bachman, K. E. & Park, B. H. Mutation of the PIK3CA oncogene in human cancers. Br. J. Cancer 94, 455–459 (2006).
Yuan, T. L. & Cantley, L. C. PI3K pathway alterations in cancer: variations on a theme. Oncogene 27, 5497–5510 (2008).
Lindhurst, M. J. et al. Mosaic overgrowth with fibroadipose hyperplasia is caused by somatic activating mutations in PIK3CA. Nat. Genet. 44, 928–933 (2012).
Nathan, N., Keppler-Noreuil, K. M., Biesecker, L. G., Moss, J. & Darling, T. N. Mosaic Disorders of the PI3K/PTEN/AKT/TSC/mTORC1 Signaling Pathway. Dermatol. Clin. 35, 51–60 (2017).
Samuels, Y. et al. High frequency of mutations of the PIK3CA gene in human cancers. Science 304, 554 (2004).
Samuels, Y. et al. Mutant PIK3CA promotes cell growth and invasion of human cancer cells. Cancer Cell 7, 561–573 (2005).
Kang, S., Bader, A. G. & Vogt, P. K. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase mutations identified in human cancer are oncogenic. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 802–807 (2005).
Mukohara, T. PI3K mutations in breast cancer: prognostic and therapeutic implications. Breast Cancer Targets Ther. 111 https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S60696 (2015).
Bachman, K. E. et al. The PIK3CA gene is mutated with high frequency in human breast cancers. Cancer Biol. Ther. 3, 772–775 (2004).
McGee, S. R., Tibiche, C., Trifiro, M. & Wang, E. Network Analysis Reveals A Signaling Regulatory Loop in the PIK3CA -mutated Breast Cancer Predicting Survival Outcome. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 15, 121–129 (2017).
Cizkova, M. et al. PIK3CA mutation impact on survival in breast cancer patients and in ERα, PR and ERBB2-based subgroups. Breast Cancer Res. BCR 14, R28 (2012).
Loi, S. et al. PIK3CA mutations associated with gene signature of low mTORC1 signaling and better outcomes in estrogen receptor–positive breast cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 10208–10213 (2010).
Pang, B. et al. Prognostic role of PIK3CA mutations and their association with hormone receptor expression in breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Sci. Rep. 4, 6255 (2014).
Eichhorn, P. J. A. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase hyperactivation results in lapatinib resistance that is reversed by the mTOR/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitor NVP-BEZ235. Cancer Res. 68, 9221–9230 (2008).
Berns, K. et al. A functional genetic approach identifies the PI3K pathway as a major determinant of trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. Cancer Cell 12, 395–402 (2007).
Burke, J. E., Perisic, O., Masson, G. R., Vadas, O. & Williams, R. L. Oncogenic mutations mimic and enhance dynamic events in the natural activation of phosphoinositide 3-kinase p110α (PIK3CA). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 15259–15264 (2012).
Koren, S. et al. PIK3CAH1047R induces multipotency and multi-lineage mammary tumours. Nature 525, 114–118 (2015).
Meyer, D. S. et al. Luminal expression of PIK3CA mutant H1047R in the mammary gland induces heterogeneous tumors. Cancer Res. 71, 4344–4351 (2011).
Janku, F. et al. PIK3CA mutation H1047R is associated with response to PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway inhibitors in early-phase clinical trials. Cancer Res. 73, 276–284 (2013).
Liu, P. et al. Oncogenic PIK3CA-driven mammary tumors frequently recur via PI3K pathway-dependent and PI3K pathway-independent mechanisms. Nat. Med. 17, 1116–1120 (2011).
Sartore-Bianchi, A. et al. PIK3CA Mutations in Colorectal Cancer Are Associated with Clinical Resistance to EGFR-Targeted Monoclonal Antibodies. Cancer Res. 69, 1851–1857 (2009).
Sabour, L., Sabour, M. & Ghorbian, S. Clinical Applications of Next-Generation Sequencing in Cancer Diagnosis. Pathol. Oncol. Res. 23, 225–234 (2017).
Denis, J. A., Guillerm, E., Coulet, F., Larsen, A. K. & Lacorte, J.-M. The Role of BEAMing and Digital PCR for Multiplexed Analysis in Molecular Oncology in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing. Mol. Diagn. Ther. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-017-0287-7 (2017).
Krypuy, M., Newnham, G. M., Thomas, D. M., Conron, M. & Dobrovic, A. High resolution melting analysis for the rapid and sensitive detection of mutations in clinical samples: KRAS codon 12 and 13 mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 6, 295 (2006).
Zhao, J. et al. A sensitive and practical method to detect the T790M mutation in the epidermal growth factor receptor. Oncol. Lett. 11, 2573–2579 (2016).
Olmedillas-López, S., García-Arranz, M. & García-Olmo, D. Current and Emerging Applications of Droplet Digital PCR in Oncology. Mol. Diagn. Ther. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40291-017-0278-8 (2017).
Do, H. & Dobrovic, A. Limited copy number-high resolution melting (LCN-HRM) enables the detection and identification by sequencing of low level mutations in cancer biopsies. Mol. Cancer 8, 82 (2009).
Orou, A., Fechner, B., Utermann, G. & Menzel, H. J. Allele-specific competitive blocker PCR: a one-step method with applicability to pool screening. Hum. Mutat. 6, 163–169 (1995).
Parsons, B. L., McKinzie, P. B. & Heflich, R. H. Allele-specific competitive blocker-PCR detection of rare base substitution. Methods Mol. Biol. Clifton NJ 291, 235–245 (2005).
Thierry, A. R. et al. Clinical validation of the detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations from circulating tumorDNA. Nat. Med. 20, 430–435 (2014).
Fruman, D. A. et al. The PI3K Pathway in Human Disease. Cell 170, 605–635 (2017).
Arsenic, R. et al. Comparison of targeted next-generation sequencing and Sanger sequencing for the detection of PIK3CA mutations in breast cancer. BMC Clin. Pathol. 15, 20 (2015).
Liu, S. et al. Rapid detection of genetic mutations in individual breast cancer patients by next-generation DNA sequencing. Hum. Genomics 9, 2 (2015).
Chromosome 3: 178,952,080-178,952,090 - Region in detail - Homo sapiens - GRCh37 Archive browser 89. Available at: http://grch37.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Location/View?r=3:178952080-178952090. (Accessed: 30th June 2017).
Acknowledgements
This research project was supported by the Chief Scientist Office (ETM-433). The authors thank Marian Thomson at Edinburgh Genomics for the preparation of the TruSeq Amplicon -Cancer Panel libraries.
Funding
IK was funded by Medical Research Scotland PhD-883-2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
V.A.G. and N.R.L. conceived the project and wrote the manuscript. V.A.G. designed and carried out the experiments, analysed the data and wrote the original draft of the manuscript. C.B. collected and stored clinical samples. I.K. carried out experiments and analyzed the data. K.G. and U.T. carried out the sequencing experiments and analysed the data. O.O. recruited the patients and contributed to writing the manuscript. P.M.B. and M.K.K. contributed to the concept and design of the study. All authors read, edited and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original online version of this Article was revised: The original version of this Article omitted the Funding section. The Funding section now reads: “IK was funded by Medical Research Scotland PhD-883-2015.”
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Alvarez-Garcia, V., Bartos, C., Keraite, I. et al. A simple and robust real-time qPCR method for the detection of PIK3CA mutations. Sci Rep 8, 4290 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22473-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22473-9
This article is cited by
-
Identification of DNA variants at ultra-low variant allele frequencies via Taq polymerase cleavage of wild-specific blockers
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (2023)
-
Protein Expression of PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway Targets Validated by Gene Expression and its Correlation with Prognosis in Canine Mammary Cancer
Journal of Mammary Gland Biology and Neoplasia (2022)
-
A novel hotspot specific isothermal amplification method for detection of the common PIK3CA p.H1047R breast cancer mutation
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
PIK3CA mutation enrichment and quantitation from blood and tissue
Scientific Reports (2020)
-
Detection of KRAS mutation via ligation-initiated LAMP reaction
Scientific Reports (2019)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.