Article | Open | Published:

Black Sea outflow response to Holocene meltwater events

Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 4081 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

During the Holocene, North American ice sheet collapse and rapid sea-level rise reconnected the Black Sea with the global ocean. Rapid meltwater releases into the North Atlantic and associated climate change arguably slowed the pace of Neolithisation across southeastern Europe, originally hypothesized as a catastrophic flooding that fueled culturally-widespread deluge myths. However, we currently lack an independent record linking the timing of meltwater events, sea-level rise and environmental change with the timing of Neolithisation in southeastern Europe. Here, we present a sea surface salinity record from the Northern Aegean Sea indicative of two meltwater events at ~8.4 and ~7.6 kiloyears that can be directly linked to rapid declines in the establishment of Neolithic sites in southeast Europe. The meltwater events point to an increased outflow of low salinity water from the Black Sea driven by rapid sea level rise >1.4 m following freshwater outbursts from Lake Agassiz and the final decay of the Laurentide ice sheet. Our results shed new light on the link between catastrophic sea-level rise and the Neolithisation of southeastern Europe, and present a historical example of how coastal populations could have been impacted by future rapid sea-level rise.

Introduction

The analysis of early Holocene episodes of rapid ice-sheet disintegration and meltwater release are highly relevant for our understanding of future sea-level change due to global warming and the associated societal effects on coastal populations1,2,3. The final drainage of the glacial Lake Agassiz in North America at about 8.4 kiloyears (kyrs) cal BP triggered a rapid sea-level rise of >1.4 m within about 200 years2,4,5,6,7 (Fig. 1A,B). The freshwater outburst into the North Atlantic led to a reduced thermohaline circulation causing colder and drier climatic conditions over Europe, known as the 8.2 kyrs cal BP event4,7,8,9,10. A similar massive meltwater event associated with a rapid sea-level rise, in the order of 4.5 m over the following <140 years in SW Sweden11,12, has been reported at about 7.6 kyrs cal BP but did not result in any major climate changes over Europe2.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Extent of North American ice sheets during the early Holocene, location and oceanography of the studied area. (A,B) Final stage of the proglacial Lake Agassiz between about 9.0–8.7 kyrs cal BP and drainage through the Hudson Bay into the North Atlantic at about 8.5 kyrs cal BP2; LIS = Laurentide ice sheet modified after ref.2, reprinted by permission from Macmillan Publishers Ltd: Nature Geoscience (Törnqvist and Hijma, Links between early Holocene icesheet decay, sealevel rise and abrupt climate change), copyright (2012). (C) Northern Hemisphere map showing the studied Aegean Sea and Black Sea areas. (D) Location of the Aegean Sea sediment cores GeoTÜ SL152 (this study) and LC21 in relation to sea-surface salinity35 and the main surface water circulation patterns of the region following ref.14 (reprinted from Quaternary Science Reviews, volume 28, Marino et al., Early and Middle Holocene in the Aegean Sea: interplay between high and low latitude climate variability, p. 3, Copyright (2009), with permission from Elsevier. (E) Illustrative SSS depth profile across transect x1 – x2 (as shown on D) showing the present-day two-layer circulation. The maps C, D, and E are plotted using ocean data view ODV 4.7.10 (Schlitzer, R. Ocean Data View, odv.awi.de, 2017) using the salinity dataset of ref.35 that can be downloaded at https://odv.awi.de/data/ocean/medatlasii/.

We use a centennially-resolved, phytoplankton-based Sea Surface Salinity (SSS) record based on an Emiliania huxleyi transfer-function outlined by ref.13 (see Method section) from a sediment core (GeoTÜ SL152) located in the Aegean Sea approximately 130 km west from the opening of the Marmara Sea. The core is ideally located to monitor the outflow of low salinity Black Sea surface water into the Northern Aegean Sea through the Marmara Sea (Fig. 1C,D). The general trend of decreasing SSS between 11 to 5 kyrs cal BP recorded in our SSS reconstruction is remarkably mirrored in the independently-derived δ18Oseawater record14 from the southern Aegean Sea (core LC21, Figs 1D, 2). Both records support the view that there was an early Holocene humid phase in the eastern Mediterranean and Aegean Sea. This phase is predominantly influenced by changes in the eastern Mediterranean freshwater budget which is modulated by fluctuations in the strength of the African monsoon14,15. Whilst these two independent records fluctuate in concert, our new record reveals two pronounced rapid SSS drops of about 1.3 practical salinity units (psu), at ~8.4 and ~7.6 kyrs cal BP, directly dated at the minimum values to 8.4 (8314–8442 years) and 7.6 (7571–7706 years) kyrs cal BP (95% confidence intervals) (Fig. 2, see Method section, Supplement Data Table 1). These rapid salinity perturbations are strikingly synchronised to the reported timing of freshwater outbursts from Lake Agassiz and the decay of the Laurentide ice shield in North America6,7,12 (Fig. 2). The rapid sea level rises caused by these events led to an increased outflow of low salinity water from the Black Sea through the Marmara Sea into the Northern Aegean Sea, resulting in the two, rapid salinity drops recorded in our core. The rapid freshening of the sea surface water that is identifiable in the northernmost Aegean Sea, is absent in core LC21 in the southern Aegean Sea (Figs 1D, 2). This can be explained by the prominent influence of the Levantine Basin surface water circulation around core LC21 during the Holocene14,16, which would have dampened any signal of northern Aegean Sea salinity changes in the southern Aegean Sea. The increased outflow of freshwater from the Black Sea interpreted from our new salinity record is interrupted from about 8.4 and 8.0 kyrs cal BP, as evidenced by an abrupt rebound of the SSS in our record (Fig. 2). This SSS rebound corresponds to the regional expression of the cool and dry phase of the 8.2 kyrs cal BP event that was caused by a reduced thermohaline circulation well after the main Lake Agassiz’s freshwater outburst into the North Atlantic7,9,10,14. The dry and cold climatic conditions presumably contributed to a drop in the Black Sea lake level, leading to a reduced outflow of low salinity water from the Black Sea into the Northern Aegean Sea.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Timing of sea-level and sea surface salinity variation, and the establishment of Neolithic farmers across southeastern Europe during the Holocene. (a) δ18O record of the North Greenland ice-core36. (b) Relative sea-level changes in southwestern Sweden. (c) Relative sea-level change of the Rhine-Meuse-Delta2. (d) Northern Aegean Sea surface salinity (SSS) anomaly of Site GeoTÜ SL152 in practical salinity units (psu). (e) δ18Oseawater record from core LC21 as an indicator for fresher sea surface conditions in the southern Aegean Sea14. (f) Summed probability of earliest southeastern European agriculture21,28. Thin, black dashed lines indicate the duration of the sapropel 1 (S1b, S1a). The yellow bar is the interruption of the sapropel formation between about 8.0 and 8.4 kyrs cal BP in core GeoTÜ SL152. The blue dashed lines at ~7.6 and ~8.4 kyrs cal BP indicate the main phases of freshwater outburst from Lake Agassiz and the decay of the Laurentide ice sheet in North America. The grey dashed lines at 9.0 and 8.1 kyrs cal BP represent the Initial Marine Inflow (IMI) and Disappearance of the Lacustrine Species (DSL) in the Black Sea17. Small arrows indicate AMS dating points (green, this study and red literature data9 of core GeoTÜ SL152, see Method section and Supplement Table 1 and Fig. 3 for further explanations of our revised age model of GeoTÜ SL152).

The low SSS peaks in our record are a clear indication that the present-day density-driven, two-layer circulation of low salinity surface water outflow from the Black Sea into the Marmara Sea, and vice versa, high salinity inflow of marine water into the Black Sea, was fully established no younger than 8.4 kyrs cal BP (Figs 1E, 2). Our data suggest that the two-layer circulation could have already initiated approximately 8.8 kyrs cal BP with the beginning of the steep salinity decline in our record. This indicates that the time between the Initial Marine Inflow (IMI) into the Black Sea at about 9.0 kyrs cal BP17,18,19 and the fully established two-layer circulation may have been only 200 to a maximum of 600 years. In contrast, it has been previously inferred from the disappearance of lacustrine species (DLS) in the Black Sea that the two-layer circulation was fully established at ~8.1 kyrs cal BP, 900 years after the IMI at about 9.0 kyrs cal BP17.

Our new data and the well constrained chronology of our core is crucial for reassessing the timing of early Holocene sea-level and climate change with the record of Neolithisation in southeastern Europe, which has been strongly debated over the last two decades20,21,22,23,24,25,26. This debate is due, in part, to the uncertainties related to the reservoir effect on 14C ages from the Black Sea17,27. The summed probability record of the earliest southeastern European agriculture, a commonly used method of demic migration of Neolithic settlements21,28 (Fig. 2f), shows four key features: a rapid decline of newly-established settlements at about 8.4 kyrs cal BP, followed by a low stasis until 8.2 kyrs cal BP, an increase in establishment from 8.2 to 7.7 kyrs cal BP, and a rapid decrease of settlement establishment at about 7.6 kyrs cal BP. The use of summed probability distributions of archaeological radiocarbon dates might have limitations and biases that may affect their comparison to paleoceanographic records and should therefore be used with caution29,30. Nevertheless, the rapid decline and the low stasis of the summed probability distribution of refs21,28 between 8.4 and 8.2 kyrs cal BP has previously been interpreted as an absence of Neolithic site establishments and attributed directly to a rise of the Black Sea lake-level of about 130 m due to Lake Agassiz’s freshwater outburst at about 8.5 kyr cal BP21, overtopping the Bosporus Sill (Fig. 1e) and leading to catastrophic flooding of the Black Sea area21. However, our data instead indicates that there was no catastrophic rise of the Black Sea lake level of about 130 m because the Black Sea lake level was already higher than the Bosporus sill depth as early as ~11.1–9.2 kyrs cal BP and well before Lake Agassiz’s freshwater outburst17,23,31, as evidenced by sediments from the Marmara Sea, the Black Sea25,32 and the salinity decrease in our record around 8.8 kyrs cal BP.

The timings of the steep declines in the summed probability of settlements (Fig. 2f) correspond to two rapid sea-level rises of 1.4 m and up to 4.5 m at ~8.4 and ~7.6 kyrs cal BP, respectively, recorded at SW Sweden and the Rhine-Meuse Delta2,12. The timing of the former sea-level rise can be attributed to freshwater outburst from Lake Agassiz and the latter to the collapse of the Laurentide ice sheet2 (Fig. 2). Whilst the ~8.4 kyr cal BP event has been well-documented, the second interruption in Neolithic farming establishment at ~7.6 kyrs cal BP has been not reported by previous studies. Furthermore, we relate the stasis in summed probability of agriculture between 8.4 and 8.2 kyrs cal BP to the combined effects of rapid sea level rise and subsequent flooding following Lake Agassiz’s freshwater outburst and the cool and dry climatic conditions of the 8.2 kyrs cal BP event caused by a reduced North Atlantic thermohaline circulation. Our well-constrained chronology of rapid salinity changes in the Northern Aegean Sea might assist in unravelling the longstanding discussion of catastrophic sea-level changes impeding the Neolithisation of southeastern Europe.

Methods

Sediment core SL152

This study focused on the Holocene sediment gravity core GeoTÜ SL152 (40°05.19′N, 24° 36.65′E; water depth: 978 m) recovered in 2001 during R.V. Meteor cruise M51/3 from the Mount Athos Basin, northern Aegean Sea. The hemipelagic muds are rapidly deposited (about 31–37 cm per thousand years) including an organic-rich layer, the so-called sapropel 1 (S1). The position of the core SL152 approximately 130 km west from Sedd el Bahr at the opening of the Marmara Sea is ideal to record the outflow of low salinity Black Sea surface water into the Northern Aegean Sea through the Dardanelles-Bosporus corridor.


Age model

The chronology of core GeoTÜ SL152 along with the sapropel 1 (S1) section is based on six accelerator mass spectrometry 14C dates. Four AMS dates were taken from ref.9 in 10/2005 and two new dates (sampled in 05/2016) were taken for the present study (Supplement Data Table 1,2, Fig. 3). The ages of ref.9 are from tests of the planktic foraminifera Globigerinoides ruber and G. bulloides (Supplement Data Table 1). Our new ages are based on a mixed planktic foraminifera all in the limited size fraction of >200 µm. The 14C analyses were performed at the Leibniz Laboratory for Radiometric Dating and Stable Isotope Research, Kiel and at Beta Analytic Inc. in Florida (new samples Beta-483196 and Beta-483197 (Supplement Data Table 1). All conventional radiocarbon ages had sigma errors between 30 and 55 years, and were converted to calendar years with a local reservoir correction ΔR of-113 years and the MARINE13 database33. For age modeling and correction, we used the software program Clam34 with a spline-fit model based on 10000 iterations and the default smoothing level of 0.3. AMS calendar years are expressed as best and min/max ages (95% probability). Our age-depth curve shows that the six 14C dates yield highly consistent ages (Fig. 3). Changing sedimentation rates across our studied interval are only minor (Supplement Data Table 2).

Figure 3
Figure 3

Revised age model for core GeoTü SL152 of reference9. Age-depth graph for the six 14C AMS radiocarbon ages (210–355.5 cm, see Supplement Table 1) embedded vs. core depth in core GeoTÜ SL152.


Phytoplankton-based reconstruction of Sea surface Salinity (SSS)

To calculate mean annual SSS we used the methods as outline by ref.13. All SSS estimates presented here are based on transfer-function subset 4 of ref.13 in which all coccoliths of Emiliania huxleyi larger than 4 µm were excluded. Our results are presented as deviation from the average mean annual SSS of the presented interval (sea surface salinity anomaly, Supplement Data Table 2), in practical salinity units to record relative SSS anomalies. The 1 psu SSS anomaly recorded over our record at site SL152 corresponds to a 1 per mil change in δ18Oseawater at site LC21 across the same period. As δ18Oseawater is effectively a record of the (isotopically lighter) freshwater budget14, this provides independent corroboration of our phytoplankton-derived salinity proxy.

We analyzed in total 47 samples for reconstructing SSS changes with a centennial to decadal time resolution. About 50 flat lying placoliths of E. huxleyi per sample were digitized using a ZEISS SIGMA scanning electron microscope at a magnification of 20,000X and measured using the software ImageJ. The image size was 1024 * 768 pixels. The dimensions of the images were calibrated by measuring 30 mono-sized polymer calibration spheres with a diameter of 1.998 ± 0.016 µm (Duke Standard) for each sample. All measurements for calculation SSS are shown in Supplement Data Table 2.


Data availability

Data related to this paper may be requested from the corresponding author.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Syvitski, J. P. M. et al. Sinking deltas due to human activities. Nat. Geosci. 2, 681–686 (2009).

  2. 2.

    Törnqvist, T. E. & Hijma, M. P. Links between early Holocene ice-sheet decay, sea-level rise and abruptclimate change. Nat. Geosci. 5, 601–606 (2012).

  3. 3.

    Horton, B. P., Rahmstorf, S., Engelhart, S. E. & Kemp, A. C. Expert assessment of sea-level rise by AD 2100 and AD 2300. Quat. Sci. Rev. 84, 1–6 (2014).

  4. 4.

    Barber, D. et al. Forcing of the cold event of 8,200 years ago by catastrophic drainage of Laurentide Lakes. Nature 400, 344–348 (1999).

  5. 5.

    Clarke, G. K. C., Leverington, D. W., Teller, J. T. & Dyke, A. S. Paleohydraulics of the last outburst flood from glacial Lake Agassiz and the 8200 BP cold event. Quat. Sci. Rev. 23, 389–407 (2004).

  6. 6.

    Lewis, C. F. M., Miller, A. A. L., Levac, E., Piper, D. J. W. & Sonnichsen, G. V. Lake Agassiz outburst age and routing by Labrador Current and the 8.2 cal ka cold event. Quat. Int. 260, 83–97 (2012).

  7. 7.

    Lawrence, T., Long, A. J., Gehrels, W. R., Jackson, L. P. & Smith, D. E. Relative sea-level data from southwest Scotland constrain meltwater-driven sea-level jumps prior to the 8.2 kyr BP event. Quat. Sci. Rev. 151, 292–308 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Rohling, E. J. & Pälike, H. Centennial-scale climate cooling with a sudden cold event around 8,200 years ago. Nature 434, 975–979 (2005).

  9. 9.

    Kotthoff, U. et al. Climate dynamics in the borderlands of the Aegean Sea during formation of sapropel S1 deduced from a marine pollen record. Quat. Sci. Rev. 27, 832–845 (2008).

  10. 10.

    Pross, J. et al. Massive perturbation in terrestrial ecosystems of the Eastern Mediterranean region associated with the 8.2 kyr BP climatic event. Geology 37, 887–890 (2009).

  11. 11.

    Blanchon, P. & Shaw, J. Reef drowning during the last deglaciation: Evidence for catastrophic sea-level rise and ice-sheet collapse. Geology 23, 4–8 (1995).

  12. 12.

    Yu, S.-Y., Berglund, B. E., Sandgren, P. & Lambeck, K. Evidence for a rapid sea-level rise 7600 yr ago. Geology 35, 891–894 (2007).

  13. 13.

    Bollmann, J., Herrle, J. O., Cortés, M. Y. & Fielding, S. R. The effect of sea water salinity on the morphology of Emiliania huxleyi in plankton and sediment samples. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 284, 320–328 (2009).

  14. 14.

    Marino, G. et al. Early and middle Holocene in the Aegean Sea: interplay between high and low latitude climate variability. Quat. Sci. Rev. 28, 3246–3262 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Rohling, E. J. Environmental control on Mediterranean salinity and δ18O. Paleoceanography 14, 706–715 (1999).

  16. 16.

    Adloff, F. et al. Upper ocean climate of the Eastern Mediterranean Sea during the Holocene Insolation Maximum - A model study. Clim. Past 7, 1103–1122 (2011).

  17. 17.

    Soulet, G., Ménot, G., Lericolais, G. & Bard, E. A revised calendar age for the last reconnection of the Black Sea to the global ocean. Quat. Sci. Rev. 30, 1019–1026 (2011).

  18. 18.

    Yanko-Hombach, V., Mudie, P. J., Kadurin, S. & Larchenkov, E. Holocene marine transgression in the Black Sea: New evidence from the northwestern Black Sea shelf. Quat. Int. 345, 100–118 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Yanchilina, A. G. et al. Compilation of geophysical, geochronological, and geochemical evidence indicates a rapid Mediterranean-derived submergence of the Black Sea’s shelf and subsequent substantial salinification in the early Holocene. Mar. Geol. 383, 14–34 (2017).

  20. 20.

    Ryan, W. B. F., Major, C. O., Lericolais, G. & Goldstein, S. L. Catastrophic flooding of the Black Sea. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 31, 525–554 (2003).

  21. 21.

    Turney, C. S. M. & Brown, H. Catastrophic early Holocene sea level rise, human migration and the Neolithic transition in Europe. Quat. Sci. Rev. 26, 2036–2041 (2007).

  22. 22.

    Berger, J.-F. & Guilaine, J. The 8200cal BP abrupt environmental change and the Neolithic transition: A Mediterranean perspective. Quat. Int. 200, 31–49 (2009).

  23. 23.

    Giosan, L., Filip, F. & Constatinescu, S. Was the Black Sea catastrophically flooded in the early Holocene? Quat. Sci. Rev. 28, 1–6 (2009).

  24. 24.

    Bikoulis, P. Evaluating the impact of Black Sea flooding on the Neolithic of northern Turkey. World Archaeol. 47, 756–775 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Hiscott, R. et al. The Marmara Sea Gateway since ~16 ky BP: non-catastrophic causes of paleoceanographic events in the Black Sea at 8.4 and 7.15 ky BP. in The Black Sea Flood Question: Changes in Coastline, Climate, and Human Settlement(eds Yanko-Hombach, V., Gilbert, A., Panin, N. & PM, D.) 89–117 (Springer Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5302-3_5 (2007).

  26. 26.

    Weninger, B. & Clare, L. 6600–6000 cal BC Abrupt Climate Change and Neolithic Dispersal from West Asia. in Megadrought and Collapse: From Early Agriculture to Ankor (ed. Weiss, H.) 69–92 (Oxford University Press, 2017).

  27. 27.

    Kwiecien, O. et al. Estimated reservoir ages of the Black Sea since the last glacial. Radiocarbon 50, 99–118 (2008).

  28. 28.

    Pinhasi, R., Fort, J. & Ammerman, A. J. Tracing the origin and spread of agriculture in Europe. PLoS Biol. 3, 2220–2228 (2005).

  29. 29.

    Crema, E. R., Bevan, A. & Shennan, S. Spatio-temporal approaches to archaeological radiocarbon dates. J. Archaeol. Sci. 87, 1–9 (2017).

  30. 30.

    Bamforth, D. B. & Grund, B. Radiocarbon calibration curves, summed probability distributions, and early Paleoindian population trends in North America. J. Archaeol. Sci. 39, 1768–1774 (2012).

  31. 31.

    Görür, N. et al. Is the abrupt drowning of the Black Sea shelf at 7150 yr BP a myth? Mar. Geol. 176, 65–73 (2001).

  32. 32.

    McHugh, C. M. G. et al. The last reconnection of the Marmara Sea (Turkey) to the World Ocean: A paleoceanographic and paleoclimatic perspective. Mar. Geol. 255, 64–82 (2008).

  33. 33.

    Reimer, P. J. et al. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55, 1869–1887 (2013).

  34. 34.

    Blaauw, M. Methods and code for ‘classical’ age-modelling of radiocarbon sequences. Quat. Geochronol. 5, 512–518 (2010).

  35. 35.

    MEDAR Group. MedAtlas/2002 database. Mediterranean and Black Sea database of temperature salinity and bio-chemical parameters. (2002).

  36. 36.

    Rasmussen, S. O. et al. A new Greenland ice core chronology for the last glacial termination. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D06102 (2006).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Samples are from RV Meteor cruise M51-3 (2001). We acknowledge chief scientist C. Hemleben and team for curating the samples at the University of Tübingen. U. Kotthoff supported the study by providing published data and explanations and B. Schminke by preparing samples and taking images. This work was supported by the Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre Frankfurt (BIK-F), the Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach Foundation, the Joubin James Award of the Earth Sciences Department, University of Toronto, the Freunde und Förderer, and the International Office DAAD Program of the Goethe-University Frankfurt by a grant to J.O.H. and by J.B.’s NSERC Discovery grant.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Institute of Geosciences, Altenhoeferallee 1, Goethe-University Frankfurt, D-60438, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    • Jens O. Herrle
    • , Christina Gebühr
    • , Rosie M. Sheward
    •  & Annika Giesenberg
  2. Biodiversity and Climate Research Centre (BIK-F), Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325, Frankfurt am Main, Germany

    • Jens O. Herrle
    •  & Christina Gebühr
  3. Department of Earth Sciences, University of Toronto, Earth Sciences Centre, 22 Russell Street, M5S3B1, Toronto, ON, Canada

    • Jörg Bollmann
  4. Institute of Geosciences, University of Tübingen, Sigwartstr. 10, 72076, Tübingen, Germany

    • Hartmut Schulz

Authors

  1. Search for Jens O. Herrle in:

  2. Search for Jörg Bollmann in:

  3. Search for Christina Gebühr in:

  4. Search for Hartmut Schulz in:

  5. Search for Rosie M. Sheward in:

  6. Search for Annika Giesenberg in:

Contributions

J.B. and J.O.H. equally contributed to the design of the study. The manuscript was written by J.B., J.O.H. and R.M.S. C.G., A.G., J.O.H. and H.S. performed analyses. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jens O. Herrle.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22453-z

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.