Abstract
Evaluating the submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) derived strontium (Sr) flux from the Bengal Basin to the Bay of Bengal (BoB) and determining its isotopic composition is crucial for understanding the marine Sr isotopic evolution over time. Measurements of spatially and temporally distributed water samples collected from the BoB show radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr, high Sr, calcium (Ca) concentrations and high salinity in samples collected dominantly from 100–120 m depth, which can be explained only by the contribution of saline groundwater from the Bengal Basin. These results provide a direct evidence of the SGD-Sr flux to the BoB. This SGD-Sr flux is however, spatially heterogeneous and using conservative hydrological estimates of the SGD flux to the BoB, we suggest a SGD Sr flux of 13.5–40.5 × 105 mol/yr to the BoB. Mass balance calculations using Sr concentrations and 87Sr/86Sr suggest up to 7% contribution of SGD to the 100–120 m BoB water samples. The identification of SGD at 100–120 m depth also provides an explanation for the anomalous variations in barium (Ba) concentrations and the δ18O-salinity relationship in intermediate depths of the BoB.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The Bay of Bengal (BoB) receives large fluxes of continental Sr, characterized by radiogenic Sr isotopic (87Sr/86Sr) composition, from the Himalayan mountain belt. Strontium is carried, dominantly as part of the dissolved load, by large rivers like the Ganges, Brahmaputra as well as the Irrawaddy, to the BoB. The 87Sr/86Sr ratios of the Himalayan outflows have played a major role in modulating the global marine Sr budget1,2,3,4 and the rise of the Himalayas has led to a marked increase in the 87Sr/86Sr ratio of the average global seawater over the last 40 Ma5. In addition to the surface flows, submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) was proposed as a significant source of continental Sr to the BoB6. While the seasonal and spatial variations in Sr concentrations and 87Sr/86Sr ratios of the large Himalayan rivers have been well-studied7,8,9,10, those of the subsurface flow are poorly constrained and their role in modulating the marine 87Sr/86Sr is debated due to contrasting observations, as described below.
The contribution of the SGD to the BoB was proposed to explain the high Ba concentrations (~460–740 nM) in surface waters of north-eastern coastal BoB (Fig. 1) sampled during the dry season (March), when the monsoon-driven riverine discharge and associated particle load is low11. An alternate explanation for this high Ba concentration in surface waters of BoB during the dry season is the desorption of Ba from older sediments due to the interaction with saline water12. Since Ba is a non-conservative tracer13, it is difficult to ascertain whether the high Ba concentrations in the surface BoB water samples during the dry months are source dependent (SGD versus riverine) or process dependent (e.g., adsorption and/or desorption of older particulate matter). In contrast to Ba, Sr is relatively well-mixed in the oceans and is a conservative tracer5. Groundwater samples of the Bengal Basin show high Sr concentration (average 4.5 μmol/l) which is an order of magnitude higher than that in the Himalayan rivers6. Based on these high Sr concentrations as well as hydrological considerations (high recharge rates of ~60–80 cm/yr when normalized by the land area and a high flux of SGD of 2 × 1011 m3/yr), it was proposed that the subsurface flowing groundwaters of the Bengal Basin contribute an equal amount of Sr to the BoB as the Ganges-Brahmaputra rivers6,14. However, this high SGD flux value6 was questioned15 and it was argued that this value could be biased by groundwater pumping in the Bengal Basin. Using regional hydrological modelling, the recharge rate was estimated to be 0.4 cm/yr, when normalized by a regional land area of 2.5 × 1011 m2, and the SGD flux from the Bengal Basin was estimated to be 3 × 108 m3/year with post-development pumping taken into account and up to 9 × 108 m3/year without pumping16 which was two to three orders of magnitude lower than the original proposal6. Additionally, the radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr ratio of the groundwater (0.7150–0.7200)6 was not detected in measurements of surface water samples of the BoB17 collected during the dry months of January and February from the north-eastern BoB (Fig. 1), thereby questioning the role of the Bengal Basin SGD in modulating the marine Sr isotopic composition.
Geochemical and Sr isotopic compositional heterogeneity in Bay of Bengal water samples
Seawater samples were collected from 21 locations in the northwestern BoB, west of the sampling locations of earlier studies11,12,17 (Fig. 1). These samples include surface water as well as sub-surface water and were collected over a time span of 29 months from August 2014 to December 2016 from the open ocean (Fig. 1, Table 1). The samples collected in 2014 (August/September) and 2015 (August/September) were during the summer monsoon season when both river discharge and rainfall are high while samples collected in February 2016 and December 2016 were during the dry winter months (non-monsoon) when river discharge is low18. Strontium and Ca concentrations in the water samples were measured using an inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer (ICPMS, Thermo Scientific X-Series II), while Sr isotope ratio measurements (87Sr/86Sr) were performed using a thermal ionization mass spectrometer (TIMS, Thermo Scientific Triton Plus), both at the Centre for Earth Sciences (CEaS), Indian Institute of Science (IISc). Salinity of the water samples were measured in-situ. See Methods for additional details.
Due to its conservative nature, 87Sr/86Sr ratio of the open ocean is broadly homogeneous. The homegeneity in seawater 87Sr/86Sr has been established by direct measurements of deep and shallow water samples from the Hudson Bay and the Pacific, Atlantic, Indian and Arctic oceans19,20,21 as well as by measurements of biogenic carbonates22 and marine barite from Holocene sediments from the Pacific, Atlantic and Indian oceans23. The maximum variability in the 87Sr/86Sr ratio of seawater at any given time is expected to be less than 10 ppm19,20. In contrast, significant variations in the 87Sr/86Sr ratio are observed in the water samples of the BoB collected from different depths. Samples collected from depths greater than 250 m show limited variability and the average 87Sr/86Sr ratio of these samples (0.709171 ± 9, 2 SD, n = 16) (Table 1) overlaps with that of the average global seawater (0.709179 ± 8, 2 SD)21. Samples collected from 0–50 m depth show a larger range in 87Sr/86Sr (0.709148–0.709218, average = 0.709181 + 39, 2 SD, n = 25). Significant variations are observed in 87Sr/86Sr ratios (0.709166–0.709339, average = 0.709211 ± 106, 2 SD, n = 15) of the samples collected from 100–120 m depth (Table 1). Salinity of the BoB water samples, consistent with previous depth-profile measurements24, also show significant variability (28.501–35.035 psu). The average salinity increases while the 2 SD of the average value decreases in samples collected from 0–50 m (31.630 ± 2.498 psu) to 100–120 m (34.619 ± 0.788 psu) to >250 m (34.967 ± 0.129 psu). The deep BoB water samples show salinity values that overlap with global oceans (~35 psu)25.
Concentrations of Sr (51.23–91.32 μmol/l) and Ca (6.26–10.94 mmol/l) show significant variability in the 56 BoB water samples with samples collected from 0 m and 50 m depth showing significantly lower Sr and Ca (Fig. 2, Table 1). Strontium concentrations in global seawater show variations (e.g., 7.40–8.79 ppm26 or 84.18–99.90 μmol/l). Within the Pacific Ocean, Sr concentrations range from 7.21 ppm to 8.43 ppm which is equivalent to 82.02–95.90 μmol/l25,26,27. Globally, surface seawater samples typically show lower Sr concentrations compared to deeper water25 while near shore samples also show relatively low values26. The Sr concentrations in the BoB water samples overlap with that reported for global oceans25,26,27. However, the slightly lower concentrations, especially in the 0–50 m depth samples of the BoB, could be due to large inputs from the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Irrawaddy rivers which have very low Sr concentrations (Table 2) as well as dilution due to rainwater contribution. It has been suggested that the salinity/Sr value of ocean water is constant27 although, some studies suggest otherwise28. For the BoB water samples, the salinity/Sr values for the surface water samples overlap with those of the deep-water samples (Fig. 3, Table 1). A couple of surface water samples (locations S5, S9) collected during the monsoon show high salinity/Sr due to the dilution effect of rainwater which has very low Sr29. The concentrations of Ca and Sr in the BoB water samples show a positive correlation (R2 = 0.95, Fig. 2b) which is consistent with the similar behavior of these two elements in aqueous systems. However, the Ca/Sr ratio of the samples collected from 0 m and 50 m show mostly higher values compared to the deeper water samples (Fig. 2c).
The variations in the geochemical and Sr isotopic compositions in the BoB water samples could be due to multiple reasons that include: (i) local hydrothermal input and/or oceanic crust - seawater interaction at mid-oceanic ridges30, (ii) differential atmospheric contributions (aerosol and/or rainwater)31, (iii) biomineralization and its subsequent dissolution25, (iv) dissolution of riverine particulate matter32 and (v) mixing of different water masses33. The absence of any active mid-oceanic ridge in the BoB rules out any local hydrothermal inputs. The atmospheric contribution of Sr to the Bengal basin was estimated to be 21 nmol/l8 while Sr concentrations in rainwater were estimated to be 32–191 nM29. These concentrations are very low to affect the oceanic Sr reservoir with an average Sr concentration of 91.3 μmol/l5. In addition, the lack of any variations in Sr, Ca concentrations, salinity and as well as 87Sr/86Sr ratios between samples collected during the monsoon (2014, 2015) and non-monsoon (2016) (Fig. 2), all indicate that atmospheric contributions could not have affected the 87Sr/86Sr of the BoB water samples. Biomineralization of Celestite (SrSO4), tests of the protozoan acantharia and its dissolution25,34 have been invoked to explain the ~5% variation25 in the Sr concentrations with depth in certain oceanic basins. However, these organisms have not been reported in the BoB. In addition, the lack of seasonal variation in the Sr, Ca concentrations and 87Sr/86Sr ratios in the monsoon-driven biogeochemical system of BoB, (Fig. 2) rules out the possibility of any biogenic contribution to the Sr isotopic variation of BoB. The dissolution of riverine particulate matter can also change the 87Sr/86Sr ratio of seawater samples32,35. If the dissolution of particulate sediments is the source of the high 87Sr/86Sr in the BoB water samples, a seasonal variation would be expected in the Sr concentration and 87Sr/86Sr of the BoB water as the suspended sediment load in the rivers is very high during the monsoon. In addition, the effect of sediment dissolution is expected to be higher in the samples collected from closer to the coast where the riverine influence is higher compared to the samples collected from father away. However, the radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr ratios observed in the BoB water samples, particularly in the samples collected from 100 m depth, which were collected both during the monsoon and non-monsoon seasons do not show any seasonal variations as well as any relationship with the sampling distance from the coast (Figs 1, 2). Therefore, the contribution from the dissolution of particulate matter can be ruled out. Hence, the observed variations in the Sr concentrations and 87Sr/86Sr as well as salinity in the BoB samples (Figs 2, 3) can only be explained by the mixing of water from different sources.
Contributions of river water and evidence for submarine groundwater discharge
The samples of this study can be divided into three distinct groups based on their Sr, Ca concentration, salinity, and 87Sr/86Sr (Figs 2, 3). The first group comprises samples collected from 0–50 m depths which show lower salinity, Sr and Ca concentrations and higher Ca/Sr compared to the other samples. Strontium concentrations, especially in the samples collected from the surface, show a rough positive correlation with salinity and fall on a mixing trend between the average composition of the deep waters of BoB (>250 m, D-BoB) (Fig. 2a), which overlaps with the composition of the average global seawater, and the average compositions of the Ganges, Brahmaputra and Irrawaddy rivers (Table 2).
These samples also show large variations in 87Sr/86Sr, with mostly radiogenic values compared to the average D-BoB which overlaps with the composition of the global average seawater21 (Table 2) (Figs 2b, 4). In a plot of 87Sr/86Sr versus 1/Sr, the composition of these samples can be explained by mixing between the average D-BoB and river water end-members comprising Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Irrawaddy (Fig. 4). The compositional uniqueness of the 0–50 m samples is also evident in a plot of salinity/Sr versus 1/Sr (Fig. 3b) where, unlike the deeper water samples, these samples show large variations in Sr concentrations and no correlation between salinity/Sr and 1/Sr. The low salinity of these samples suggests the dominance of the riverine input although, the influence of groundwater cannot be ruled out. The exchange of shallow groundwater (<40 m) with the Ganges-Brahmaputra rivers has been observed in the Bengal basin, where the Sr and Li composition of both end-members overlap with each other14,36. The influence of groundwater is consistent with the composition of some of these samples that plot within the mixing domain of high saline groundwater and average seawater (Figs 2a and 4).
The second group comprises samples collected mostly from the deeper waters (>250 m depth, D-BoB) that are characterized by limited variations in Sr concentrations, average global seawater-like 87Sr/86Sr ratios, high values of salinity tightly clustered around 34.967 ± 0.129 psu (2 SD) and a strong correlation between salinity/Sr and 1/Sr (Fig. 3b). The Sr concentrations of these samples overlap with those of the Pacific and Atlantic oceans as reported by Bernat et al.27 and De Villiers25 but are lower than that reported by Wakaki et al.26.
The third group consists of samples that are collected from 100–120 m depth and are characterized by significantly radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr ratios compared to D-BoB (average 87Sr/86Sr = 0.709171), as high as 0.709339, but unlike the 0–50 m samples, these have markedly higher salinity and Sr, Ca concentrations (Table 1, Fig. 2). The salinity of these samples is however, slightly lower than the >250 m samples (Table 1, Figs 2d and 3a). Eight out of 14 samples from 100–120 m depth show more radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr ratios than that of the D-BoB. This excess in 87Sr/86Sr is expressed as Δ87Sr/86Sr (defined as [87Sr/86Sr (sample)/0.709171-1] × 106) and ranges from 24 ppm to as high as 237ppm (Fig. 4). We consider samples whose Δ87Sr/86Sr values are higher than the analytical uncertainty of the measurements (9 ppm, 2 SD) based on the external reproducibility of the average D-BoB (n = 16) (Table 1). The BoB is highly stratified with a strong shallow pycnocline at 10–30 m depth that inhibits mixing between surface and sub-surface water37. Rare exceptions can occur during tropical cyclones. For example, water characteristic of the Andaman Sea was observed within the thermocline of the western Bay of Bengal during the passage of the Tropical Cyclone Lehar38. However, the relatively high salinity of the water samples from 100–120 m depth (33.250–34.853) compared to the water samples from 0–50 m depth (28.501–33.262) (Table 1) and the lack of seasonal variability in their 87Sr/86Sr ratios, which is expected due to the varying fluxes of the monsoon-driven rivers draining into the BoB, both rule out the possibility of a riverine water input at 100–120 m depth. Therefore, we propose that the high Δ87Sr/86Sr of the water samples collected from the 100–120 m depths are a result of radiogenic Sr input of SGD from the Bengal Basin. The Sr input from a SGD is further corroborated in a plot of 87Sr/86Sr versus 1/Sr (Fig. 4), where compositions of the high Δ87Sr/86Sr water samples can only be explained by the mixing between average seawater and saline groundwater6,14 from the Bengal Basin (Table 2). This observation is also in-line with the results of regional groundwater modeling for the Bengal Basin which indicates the presence of large-scale groundwater flow at depths of 100 m or greater16.
Submarine groundwater discharge and Ba, δ18O profiles
High concentrations of the non-conservative tracer Ba in suraface waters of BoB during non-monsoon was interpreted as a signature of SGD from the Bengal Basin11. In depth profiles of Ba concentrations in the BoB39, dissolved Ba in the coastal and open waters of the BoB show depleted concentrations in the surface and enrichments in the deeper layers, a pattern similar to other oceanic systems40. Compared to the north-eastern BoB11 (Fig. 1), the Ba concentrations in the surface water samples of western BoB were found to be lower39. However, an increase in the Ba concentration below the shallow mixed layer (~60–120 m depth) was observed in most of the profiles39. One possible explanation for the increase in Ba concentrations at 60–120 m depths in northern BoB39 is the desorption of Ba from particulate matter supplied by the SGD. However, without detailed characterization of the nature of the SGD to the BoB, the above explanation is speculative. At the same water depths, the correlation between δ18O and salinity in the BoB was found to be poor24, which was explained by the mixing of two distinct water masses having very different δ18O values. One of these two water masses were suggested as Indonesian Throughflow (ITF) while the second water mass was unidentified24. This unidentified water mass at intermediate depths in the BoB could be the Bengal Basin SGD, as identified in the present study.
Spatial heterogeneity in the submarine groundwater discharge
The high concentration of Sr in the Bengal Basin groundwater and its radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr composition led to the suggestion that SGD is an important source of continental Sr to the oceans and that it carries an equal in magnitude of dissolved Sr as the Ganges-Brahmaputra rivers6. The importance of constraining the submarine groundwater Sr flux from the Bengal Basin for evaluating the global marine Sr budget was recognized but signatures of the SGD with radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr were not found in measurements of the surface waters of BoB collected during non-monsoon (January-February) near Bangladesh17 (Fig. 1). It may be noted that Beck et al.17 did not analyze any deeper water samples. In the present study, the radiogenic Sr isotopic signature of the SGD is observed in the intermediate water layers (100–120 m depth) in the north-western BoB, off the coast of India. However, the radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr signature is not observed in all the samples collected from these depths. Additionally, while the SGD signature is observed in samples away from the coast, it was not detected in four depth profiles along a traverse from the Swatch of No Ground (locations S18-S21) (Fig. 1), where the Sr-isotopic composition is very similar to the D-BoB (Table 1). The above observations suggests a spatially heterogeneous nature of the SGD flow in BoB. In the BoB, spatial heterogeneity is observed in the flow of river water in the surface BoB which is stirred by mesoscale eddies, often creating filament-like structures of low salinity waters and sharp fronts between freshwater and relatively saltier water41. A heterogeneous flow pattern of SGD from the Bengal Basin is consistent with spatially heterogeneous flow pattern of coastal SGD observed in Ubatuba, Brazil42 and could explain the contrasting findings of the present study and that of Beck et al.17.
Sr flux to the BoB from submarine groundwater discharge
The identification of the SGD signature with radiogenic 87Sr/86Sr, high Sr and high salinity at intermediate water depths of the BoB is consistent with the suggestion of Basu et al.6 regarding Sr inputs from the SGD to the BoB. However, given that the Sr-flux of SGD to the BoB from the Bengal Basin is heterogeneous, the SGD flux estimates to the BoB by Basu et al.6 were possibly overestimates, as also suggested by regional hydrological modelling studies16. Using the Bengal Basin groundwater fluxes of Michael and Voss16 which range from 3 × 108 m3/yr (post-groundwater pumping) to 9 × 108 m3/yr (pre-groundwater pumping) and the average Sr concentration of Bengal Basin groundwater of 4.5 μmol/l6, the SGD driven Sr flux to the BoB is estimated between 13.5 × 105 mol/yr and 40.5 × 105 mol/yr, which is three orders of magnitude lower than the estimates of Basu et al.6 and Dowling et al.14. Two-component mixing calculations, using Sr concentrations and 87Sr/86Sr compositions, between a saline Bengal Basin groundwater end-member (BGD22, 23)14 and the average deep BoB end-member (Tables 1, 2) (Fig. 4) suggests that for the samples with high Δ87Sr/86Sr in the BoB, the contribution of Sr from the saline Bengal Basin groundwater end-member is as high as 7%. Similar mass balance calculations using Sr concentrations and 87Sr/86Sr compositions of the Ganges, Brahmaputra or Irrawaddy rivers and those for the D-BoB end-member (Tables 1, 2) suggest that the contribution of river water to the surface water composition at BoB can range from 8–21%. The high Sr contribution from the Bengal Basin groundwater (~7%), although, spatially restricted due to the heterogeneous nature of the SGD, is higher than estimates for Li contribution from the Bengal basin groundwater (~2%) to the BoB36 and could have implications for estimates of continental Sr input to the oceans back in time.
Methods
Seawater samples from 21 locations in the northwestern BoB were collected during four different sampling missions aboard the ORV Sagar Kanya and ORV Sagar Nidhi over a time span of 29 months between August 2014 and December 2016 (Fig. 1, Table 1). The samples were collected from the open ocean. Sub-surface seawater samples were collected using 5 L Niskin bottles, mounted on a 12-bottle rosette with a Seabird CTD. The surface water samples were collected using a plastic bucket while the ship was stationed for CTD measurements. Water sampling at greater depths (depth-profiles) was not possible at all sampling locations. All samples were acidified with double-distilled nitric acid (pH ~2) immediately after sampling. The salinity data was measured in-situ from CTD (SeaBird SBE 19 Plus CTD system).
The concentrations of Sr and Ca were measured using an Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometer (ICPMS, Thermo Scientific X-Series II) at the Centre for Earth Sciences (CEaS), Indian Institute of Science (IISc). For these measurements, ultra-pure ICPMS solutions from Alfa Aesar (traceable to NIST standards) were used as calibrations standards (four-point calibration). A 10 ppb Be, In solution was used as an internal standard to correct instrumental drift. External reproducibility (2 SD) of the Sr (±2.33) and Ca (±0.47) concentrations and 1/Sr (±0.0004) were estimated based on multiple measurements of a seawater standard NASS 6 (n = 46) measured in two different analytical sessions along with repeat measurements of the samples. The concentrations of Sr and Ca in the deep-water samples of the BoB are consistent with the deep-water measurements of global oceans25,26,27.
For isotopic measurements, Sr was separated from the samples using cation-exchange chromatography. The purified Sr, was loaded on single Ta filaments and measured using a Thermal Ionization Mass Spectrometer (TIMS, Thermo Scientific Triton Plus) at CEaS, IISc. The NIST SRM 987 standard analyzed during the course of this study yielded an average value of 0.710268 ± 0.000022 (n = 22). The measured 87Sr/86Sr ratios were corrected for instrumental mass fractionation using 86Sr/88Sr = 0.1194. The normalized 87Sr/86Sr of the samples were re-normalized to the recommended NIST SRM 987 value of 0.71024443. After re-normalization, the 87Sr/86Sr ratio of the NASS 6 seawater standard, analyzed during the course of this study, yielded a value of 0.709180 ± 0.000020 (n = 4), which is consistent with the average global seawater 87Sr/86Sr value21 indicating that our measurements are accurate. The 87Sr/86Sr ratio of sixteen deep BoB water samples (D-BoB) collected from depths greater than 250 m yield an average value of 0.709170 ± 9 (2 SD) which is consistent with 87Sr/86Sr of global seawater value of 0.709179 ± 821. The D-BoB measurements indicate that our analyses are accurate and the external reproducibility of our 87Sr/86Sr measurements is better than 9 ppm. Additional details of the elemental and isotopic measurements are described in Banerjee et al.44.
References
Palmer, M. R. & Edmond, J. M. The strontium isotope budget of the modern ocean. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 92, 11–26 (1989).
Veizer, J. Strontium Isotopes in Seawater Through Time. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 17, 141–167 (1989).
Davis, A. C., Bickle, M. J. & Teagle, D. A. H. Imbalance in the oceanic strontium budget. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 211, 173–187 (2003).
Vance, D., Teagle, D. A. H. & Foster, G. L. Variable Quaternary chemical weathering fluxes and imbalances in marine geochemical budgets. Nature 458, 493–496 (2009).
Richter, F. M., Rowley, D. B. & DePaolo, D. J. Sr isotope evolution of seawater: the role of tectonics. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 109, 11–23 (1992).
Basu, A. R., Jacobsen, S. B., Poreda, R. J., Dowling, C. B. & Aggarwal, P. K. Large Groundwater Strontium Flux to the Oceans from the Bengal Basin and the Marine Strontium Isotope Record. Science 293, 1470–1473 (2001).
Krishnaswami, S., Trivedi, J. R., Sarin, M. M., Ramesh, R. & Sharma, K. K. Strontium isotopes and rubidium in the Ganga-Brahmaputra river system: Weathering in the Himalaya, fluxes to the Bay of Bengal and contributions to the evolution of oceanic 87Sr/86Sr. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 109, 243–253 (1992).
Galy, A., France-Lanord, C. & Derry, L. A. The strontium isotopic budget of Himalayan Rivers in Nepal and Bangladesh. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 63, 1905–1925 (1999).
Bickle, M. J. et al. Fluxes of Sr into the headwaters of the Ganges. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 2567–2584 (2003).
Chapman, H., Bickle, M., Thaw, S. H. & Thiam, H. N. Chemical fluxes from time series sampling of the Irrawaddy and Salween Rivers, Myanmar. Chem. Geol. 401, 15–27 (2015).
Moore, W. S. High fluxes of radium and barium from the mouth of the Ganges-Brahmaputra River during low river discharge suggest a large groundwater source. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 150, 141–150 (1997).
Carroll, J., Falkner, K. K., Brown, E. T. & Moore, W. S. The role of the Ganges-Brahmaputra mixing zone in supplying barium and 226Ra to the Bay of Bengal. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 57, 2981–2990 (1993).
Hanor, J. S. & Chan, L. H. Non-conservative behavior of barium during mixing of Mississippi River and Gulf of Mexico waters. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 37, 242–250 (1977).
Dowling, C. B., Poreda, R. J. & Basu, A. R. The groundwater geochemistry of the Bengal Basin: Weathering, chemsorption, and trace metal flux to the oceans. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 67, 2117–2136 (2003).
Harvey, C. F. Groundwater flow in the Ganges Delta. Science 296, 1563–1563 (2002).
Michael, H. A. & Voss, C. I. Controls on groundwater flow in the Bengal Basin of India and Bangladesh: Regional modeling analysis. Hydrogeol. J. 17, 1561–1577 (2009).
Beck, A. J., Charette, M. A., Cochran, J. K., Gonneea, M. E. & Peucker-Ehrenbrink, B. Dissolved strontium in the subterranean estuary - Implications for the marine strontium isotope budget. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 117, 33–52 (2013).
Papa, F. et al. Ganga-Brahmaputra river discharge from Jason-2 radar altimetry: An update to the long-term satellite-derived estimates of continental freshwater forcing flux into the Bay of Bengal. J. Geophys. Res. 117, C11021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008158 (2012).
Capo, R. & DePaolo, D. Homogeneity of Sr isotopes in the oceans. EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 73, 272 (1992).
Winter, B. L., Clark, D. L. & Johnson, C. M. Late cenozoic Sr isotope evolution of the Arctic Ocean: Constraints on water mass exchange with the lower latitude oceans. Deep. Res. Part II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 44, 1531–1542 (1997).
Mokadem, F. et al. High-precision radiogenic strontium isotope measurements of the modern and glacial ocean: Limits on glacial–interglacial variations in continental weathering. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 415, 111–120 (2015).
Burke, W. H. et al. Variation of seawater 87Sr/86Sr throughout Phanerozoic time. Geology 10, 516–519 (1982).
Paytan, A., Kastner, M., Martin, E. E., Macdougall, J. D. & Herbert, T. Marine barite as a monitor of seawater strontium isotope composition. Nature 366, 445–449 (1993).
Sengupta, S., Parekh, A., Chakraborty, S., Ravi Kumar, K. & Bose, T. Vertical variation of oxygen isotope in bay of Bengal and its relationships with water masses. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 118, 6411–6424 (2013).
De Villiers, S. Seawater strontium and Sr/Ca variability in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 171, 623–634 (1999).
Wakaki, S., Obata, H., Tazoe, H. & Ishikawa, T. Precise and accurate analysis of deep and surface seawater Sr stable isotopic composition by double-spike thermal ionization mass spectrometry. Geochem. J. 51(3), 227–239 (2017).
Bernat, M., Church, T. & Allegre, C. J. Barium and strontium concentrations in Pacific and Mediterranean sea water profiles by direct isotope dilution mass spectrometry. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 16, 75–80 (1972).
Angino, E. E., Billings, G. K. & Andersen, N. Observed variations in the strontium concentration of sea water. Chem. Geol. 1, 145–153 (1966).
Chatterjee, J. & Singh, S. K. 87Sr/86Sr and major ion composition of rainwater of Ahmedabad, India: Sources of base cations. Atmos. Environ. 63, 60–67 (2012).
Jones, C. E. & Jenkyns, H. C. Seawater strontium isotopes, oceanic anoxic events, and seafloor hydrothermal activity in the Jurassic and Cretaceous. Am. J. Sci. 301, 112–149 (2001).
Macdougall, J. D. Seawater strontium isotopes, Acid rain, and the cretaceous-tertiary boundary. Science 239, 485–487 (1988).
Jones, M. T. et al. Riverine particulate material dissolution as a significant flux of strontium to the oceans. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 355, 51–59 (2012).
Huang, K. F., You, C. F., Chung, C. H. & Lin, I. T. Nonhomogeneous seawater Sr isotopic composition in the coastal oceans: A novel tool for tracing water masses and submarine groundwater discharge. Geochemistry, Geophys. Geosystems 12, (2011).
Brass, G. W. & Turekian, K. K. Strontium distribution in Geosecs oceanic profiles. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 23, 141–148 (1974).
Jones, M. T., Pearce, C. R. & Oelkers, E. H. An experimental study of the interaction of basaltic riverine particulate material and seawater. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 77, 108–120 (2012).
Bagard, M. L., West, A. J., Newman, K. & Basu, A. R. Lithium isotope fractionation in the Ganges-Brahmaputra floodplain and implications for groundwater impact on seawater isotopic composition. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 432, 404–414 (2015).
Thadathil, P. et al. Observed seasonal variability of barrier layer in the Bay of Bengal. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 112, (2007).
Gordon, A. L., Shroyer, E., & Murty, V. S. N. An Intrathermocline Eddy and a tropical cyclone in the Bay of Bengal. Scientific Reports 7, (2017).
Singh, S. P., Singh, S. K. & Bhushan, R. Internal cycling of dissolved barium in water column of the Bay of Bengal. Mar. Chem. 154, 12–23 (2013).
Kenison Falkner, K., Macdonald, R. W., Carmack, E. C. & Weingartner, T. The potential of barium as a tracer of Arctic water masses. The Polar Oceans and Their Role in Shaping the Global Environment 63–76 (1994).
Sengupta, D., Bharath Raj, G. N., Ravichandran, M., Sree Lekha, J. & Papa, F. Near-surface salinity and stratification in the north Bay of Bengal from moored observations. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 4448–4456 (2016).
Taniguchi, M., Stieglitz, T. & Ishitobi, T. Temporal variability of water quality of submarine groundwater discharge in Ubatuba, Brazil. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 76, 484–492 (2008).
Elburg, M., Vroon, P., van der Wagt, B. & Tchalikian, A. Sr and Pb isotopic composition of five USGS glasses (BHVO-2G, BIR-1G, BCR-2G, TB-1G, NKT-1G). Chem. Geol. 223, 196–207 (2005).
Banerjee, A., Chakrabarti, R. & Mandal, S. Geochemical anatomy of a spheroidally weathered diabase. Chem. Geol. 440, 124–138 (2016).
Acknowledgements
RC acknowledges funding from IISc to set-up the TIMS and ICPMS facility at CEaS. Water sampling was funded (to DS) by the Ministry of Earth Science through the Monsoon Mission (MM/SERP/IISc/2014/IND-8). The authors thank three anonymous reviewers and the editorial board member Guebuem Kim for their comments and suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The project was designed by R.C. and D.S. Samples were collected by J.S., D.S. and S.S.A. Measurements were done by S.M., S.S.A. and J.S. R.C., S.M. and S.S.A. took lead in analysing the data and writing the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chakrabarti, R., Mondal, S., Acharya, S.S. et al. Submarine groundwater discharge derived strontium from the Bengal Basin traced in Bay of Bengal water samples. Sci Rep 8, 4383 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22299-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22299-5
This article is cited by
-
Unravelling the signatures of submarine groundwater discharge and seawater intrusion along the coastal plains of Odisha, India: a multi-proxy approach
Environmental Geochemistry and Health (2024)
-
Bioavailable Sr and Pb isotope ratios of archaeological cattle bone from coastal India
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry (2024)
-
Submarine Groundwater Discharge from an Urban Estuary to Southeastern Bay of Bengal, India: Revealed by Trace Element Fluxes
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (2021)
-
Finite element modelling to assess the submarine groundwater discharge in an over exploited multilayered coastal aquifer
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2021)
-
Spatial variations in dissolved inorganic nutrients in the groundwaters along the Indian coast and their export to adjacent coastal waters
Environmental Science and Pollution Research (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.