Article | Open

Impaired Cardiac Function in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis by Comparison with Normal Subjects

  • Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 3300 (2018)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21599-0
  • Download Citation
Published online:


Multiple sclerosis (MS), neurologic disease affecting young population, may cause cardiovascular dysfunction, due to autonomous nervous dysfunction, physical invalidity, increased oxidative stress, and systemic inflammatory status. However, cardiovascular function is rarely evaluated in these patients. We assessed left and right ventricular (LV and RV) function by 2D, 3D, tissue Doppler, and speckle tracking echocardiography, and vascular function by remodeling, stiffness, and endothelial dysfunction parameters in patients with MS, compared to control subjects. 103 subjects (35 ± 10 years,70 women) were studied: 67 patients with MS and 36 control subjects. Patients with MS had decreased LV systolic function, confirmed by lower 2D and 3D ejection fraction, mitral annular plane systolic excursion, longitudinal myocardial systolic velocities, and 2D and 3D global longitudinal strain. The RV function was also decreased, as demonstrated by lower fractional area change, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, longitudinal systolic velocities, and longitudinal strain. Additionally, LV diastolic and left atrial (LA)  function were decreased compared to controls. The parameters of arterial and endothelial function were similar between groups. Patients with MS have impaired biventricular function by comparison with normal subjects, with reduced LA function, but normal arterial and endothelial function. The noninvasive echocardiographic techniques might help to determine patients with MS at risk of developing cardiovascular dysfunction.


Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological condition, characterized by recurrent episodes of inflammation and demyelinisation of the central nervous system, that determine axonal degeneration and lead to irreversible progressive invalidity1. MS is the main cause of non-traumatic neurological invalidity in young and middle-aged populations, affecting women two times more frequently than men2.

The main mechanisms of impaired cardiovascular (CV) function in patients with MS are the cardiomyocite structure alteration, the CV autonomous nervous system dysfunction, physical invalidity, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and the presence of associated cardiovascular risk factors3. Patients with MS have a higher mortality rate compared to the general population, and this might be related to an higher incidence of CV disease4,5. However, cardiovascular function assessment is rarely performed in these patients. Most studies focus on the cardiotoxicity of mitoxantrone, which is nowadays a second line treatment6,7. Additionally, the majority of these studies assess conventional 2D-echocardiography and tissue Doppler parameters, however, the new techniques, such as speckle tracking echocardiography or real-time 3D-echocardiography, although simple, rapid, and effective in providing early diagnosis of myocardial dysfunction are not used8,9.

There is little knowledge about the cardiovascular function in MS, and subsequent research is required to improve the understanding of these mechanisms and to develop management algorithms capable to detect and prevent CV adverse events in this population. Therefore, our objective was to extensively assess cardiac and arterial function in patients with MS, compared to control subjects, in order to provide a pilot model for the early detection of CV dysfunction in these group of young patients.


Study population

We prospectively enrolled 103 subjects (mean age 35 ± 10 years old, 70 women), divided in two groups: the MS group with 67 subjects with confirmed MS, and the control group with 36 control subjects. Within the MS group, 35 patients were already treated for more than 6 months with interferon or glatiramer acetate, while 32 patients were newly diagnosed and free of immunomodulatory treatment. Mean duration of MS was 5.2 ± 5.0 years. The two study groups had similar mean age and gender distribution, with an equal incidence of CV risk factors, such as arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and obesity (Table 1). The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score in the MS group was 2.5 ± 1.5, showing mild disability.

Table 1 General characteristics of patients with multiple sclerosis and control subjects; data are expressed as mean ± SD or percentages.

Left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) systolic function

Patients with MS had decreased LV systolic function compared to control subjects, as showed by lower 2D left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), lower 3D LVEF, lower mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE), lower “online” longitudinal myocardial systolic velocity (S’), lower global longitudinal strain (LS), and lower 3D LS (Table 2  and Figure 1). Meanwhile, patients with MS had decreased RV systolic function compared to control subjects, as showed by lower fractional area change (FAC), lower tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), affected RV myocardial performance index (RVMPI), lower peak tricuspid annular systolic velocity (RV S’), and lower RV strain. Additionally, patients with MS had higher systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) than the control subjects (Table 2 and Figure 1).

Table 2 Left ventricular and right ventricular systolic function, assessed by echocardiography, of patients with multiple sclerosis and control subjects. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.

LV diastolic function

Patients with MS had impaired LV diastolic function, compared to control subjects, as showed by lower early (E) and late (A) diastolic velocities, lower flow propagation velocities (FPV), and longer isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT). Meanwhile, in patients with MS, early “online” longitudinal myocardial diastolic velocity (E’) was lower than in control subjects, although the E/E’ ratio was similar between groups. In patients with MS, the untwist rate (UTR) was reduced compared to control subjects, as well as the left atrial systolic  longitudinal strain (LA SLS) (Table 3).

Table 3 Left ventricular diastolic function, assessed by echocardiography, of patients with multiple sclerosis and control subjects. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.

Arterial function

Arterial remodeling, assessed by intima media thickness (IMT), was similar between the groups. Arterial stiffness, assessed by Peterson elastic module Ep, β index, augmentation index (Aix), arterial compliance, and pulse wave velocity carotid-femoral (PWV CF), and endothelial function, assessed by flow mediated dilation (FMD), were also similar between groups (Table 4).

Table 4 Arterial function of patients with multiple sclerosis and control subjects. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.


The troponin I value, as a marker of myocardial ischemia, was similar between the two groups: 0.0007 ± 0.001 ng/ml in the MS group and 0.0012 ± 0.002 ng/dl in the control group. The N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP), as a marker of heart failure, was also similar between groups: 35 ± 26 pg/ml in the MS group and 37 ± 32 pg/ml in the control group.

Subgroups analysis

We performed a subgroup analysis, by dividing patients with MS into newly diagnosed MS patients (MS1 = 32 patients) and treated MS patients (MS2 = 35 patients). There were no significant differences between the two subgroups for any of the echocardiographic parameters, but each of them was different from the control subjects (Supplementary Table 1).


Our study provides a comprehensive evaluation of cardiovascular function in patients with MS compared to matched control subjects. We demonstrated that patients with MS, by comparison with control subjects, have impaired LV systolic and diastolic function, with reduced LA function, impaired RV function with increased systolic pulmonary artery pressure, but similar arterial and endothelial function. Meanwhile, biomarkers of myocardial ischemia and heart failure were similar between groups. These findings are significant for the daily clinical practice, by emphasizing that this young and active population should receive the best standard of care from a multidisciplinary team, including a cardiologist. Based on these results, we suggest the use of the new echocardiographic techniques for the early detection of cardiovascular dysfunction in patients with MS, because they are harmless, inexpensive, and largely available. The advance in the therapy of MS significantly improves survival and morbidity, but we should not allow this effect to be diminished by the cardiovascular morbidity10. Our exploratory study needs further confirmation before being implementing by guidelines in patients with MS, however, it opens important premises for further research and innovation in the new field of neuro-cardiology.

Patients with MS have a lower life expectancy than normal population, but detailed data on mortality in MS are limited11. Recent population studies12 showed that the median survival time from onset of disease was approximately 10 years shorter for patients with MS, than for the age‐matched subjects, and MS was associated with an almost threefold increase in the risk of death. This increase in mortality might be also related to cardiovascular dysfunction13, but most of the studies did not differentiate between various types of causes of death. Two large studies revealed that MS was associated with an increased risk of hospital admission for ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure in the first year of diagnosis, and that the increased risk for heart failure persisted over time, suggesting that early diagnosis of cardiac dysfunction in patients with MS might be crucial in order to start preventive measures14,15. The detailed mechanisms of cardiovascular dysfunction in patients with MS are not completely elucidated. Involvement of myocyte structure was showed in neuromuscular disorders, such as muscular dystrophies and myofibrillar, congenital, and metabolic myopathies16. It was also showed that isoforms of mutated muscle proteins causing muscle disease are also expressed in the myocardium, and this might be the main mechanism responsible for the impairment of the cardiac function in our study17. Additionally, the mitochondrial dysfunction is present in the central nervous system, leading to disruption of myelin production, changes that could also be present in the cardiac cells and contribute to the impairment of the cardiac function in this population18,19.

Oxidative stress is increased several times in MS20 and, associated with vascular inflammation, it may lead to endothelial dysfunction, arterial remodeling and stiffness, and overt atherosclerosis21. However, in our study both endothelial and arterial functions were similar between patients with MS and control subjects, suggesting an intrinsic myocardial involvement in these patients. Other factors that might contribute to the cardiovascular dysfunction in patients with MS are related to different prevalence of the risk factors in the MS population, since smoking, dyslipidaemia, and lack of exercise were all proved to be more frequent in patients with MS22,23.

Initial studies using echocardiography focused on cardiotoxicity of mitoxantrone in patients with MS6,7. Concordant with our finding, they reported lower myocardial performance index and shorter isovolumic relaxation time in patients with MS, when compared to controls, but on a small number of patients. Another study investigated LV and RV function in patients with MS, compared to control subjects, and showed that LV ejection fraction was decreased in patients with MS8. However, they used only conventional echocardiography, although new techniques, such as 3D-echocardiography or speckle tracking, might have had a better accuracy in detecting subtle, subclinical changes of the myocardial function. In fact, there are no studies published so far, using assessment of myocardial function by 3D-echocardiography and speckle tracking in patients with MS. Moreover, in the previous studies using tissue Doppler, number of parameters assessed was limited6,7,8. To the best of our knowledge, our study is the first one which used such a comprehensive cardiovascular assessment in patients with MS. Our results might contribute to the development of new diagnostic tools and prognostic scores for the cardiovascular dysfunction in patients with MS. Their introduction into clinical practice will allow early diagnosis of cardiovascular dysfunction in patients with MS, leading to an optimization of cardiovascular prevention, and disease specific treatment. This is an important issue, because MS is the main cause of non-traumatic neurological morbidity and, therefore, optimization of the medical management of these young, socially and economically active patients represents a priority.

Study limitations

The correct diagnosis of MS may be challenging, because the disease might be active long before the first clinical sign. The immunomodulatory treatment was heterogeneous in our treated patients, however, there were no differences between the treated and the untreated subgroups of patients with MS. This study was exploratory and needs further research in order to define the cut-off values of different echocardiographic parameters for the diagnosis of subclinical cardiac dysfunction in patients with MS.


Patients with MS have impaired biventricular function by comparison with normal subjects, with reduced LA function, but normal arterial and endothelial function, suggesting an intrinsic myocardial disease. Use of noninvasive echocardiographic techniques might help to determine patients with MS at risk of developing cardiovascular dysfunction.


Study population

We prospectively enrolled patients with confirmed MS, diagnosed according to the revised McDonald’s criteria24, and control subjects matched for age, gender, and presence of cardiovascular risk factors. Inclusion criteria for patients with MS were: (1) age between 18 and 65 years; (2) patients with confirmed MS diagnosis, both newly diagnosed or already under immunomodulatory treatment; and (3) informed consent signed. Exclusion criteria were: (1) MS treated with mitoxantrone; (2) patients with known cardiovascular disease; (3) presence of other neurological conditions; (4) any renal, pulmonary, hepatic or hematological disease; (5) diabetes mellitus; (6) any degree of arterial hypertension; (7) pregnancy; (8) difficult acoustic window. The study protocol was approved by the Local Ethic Committee of the University Emergency Hospital Bucharest (approval number 5/2013), and registered on under the identifier NCT03001284. All subjects gave their informed consent and the protocol conforms to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki, as reflected in a priori approval by our institution’s human research committee. Blood pressure, height, and weight were measured before the echocardiographic examination. Body mass index and body surface area were calculated by Du Bois formula. Following biomarkers were measured: troponin I as a marker of myocardial ischemia and NT-pro BNP as a marker of heart failure. In patients with MS, the invalidity level was calculated using the EDSS score25.


All subjects underwent comprehensive echocardiographic examination using a commercially available ultrasound machine (Vivid E9, GE Vingmed Ultrasound, Horten, Norway), equipped with a M4S probe and a 3D probe. Standard images were obtained from parasternal long- and short-axis views, and from apical views. Special acquisitions were performed for tissue Doppler, speckle tracking, and 3D-echocardiography. Data were analyzed offline, using a dedicated software package (EchoPac 9.0.1 for PC; GE Medical System). Electrocardiogram was recorded simultaneously.

Conventional echocardiography consisted of M-mode, 2D, and Doppler blood flow measurements, performed according to the current guidelines26. M-mode was used to measure systolic and diastolic thickness of the posterior and septal walls, and left ventricular, systolic and diastolic diameters. We calculated LV volumes and ejection fraction by Simpson’s method, and LV mass and LV mass indexed to body surface area estimated by LV cavity dimension and wall thickness at end-diastole. Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) was calculated from the mean of the lateral and medial annular excursions. Diastolic function was assessed by PW Doppler of the transmitral flow, and E/A ratio was calculated. LV inflow was recorded by color M-mode, flow propagation velocity (FPV) was measured, and E/FPV was calculated27. Right ventricular diameters, area and area change, and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) were measured according to the current guidelines28. Systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) was estimated from the sum of RV systolic pressure estimated from tricuspid regurgitation velocity and right atrial pressure estimated from inferior vena cava and its collapsibility28.

Tissue Doppler was used to calculate the peak longitudinal, systolic and diastolic myocardial velocities in the offline analysis (S’ and E’, respectively), averaged from six basal segments of the left ventricle, from 2-, 3-, and 4-chamber views. The online S’ and E’ were measured; online E/E’ ratio was calculated as a marker of ventricular filling29. Right ventricular myocardial performance index (MPI) was calculated from the online pulsed tissue Doppler curves of the tricuspid annulus, using the formula MPI = (TCO −  ET)/ET, where TCO is tricuspid valve closure-to-opening time and ET is ejection time28.

Speckle tracking was used to assess systolic myocardial deformation in three directions: longitudinal, circumferential, and radial. Peak systolic longitudinal strain (LS) and strain rate (LSR) were calculated as a mean of 18 ventricular segments from the apical views, while peak circumferential strain (CS) and strain rate (CSR), and peak radial strain (RS) and strain rate (RSR) were calculated from 6 ventricular segments from the short-axis view at the level of the papillary muscles9,30. Right ventricular longitudinal strain and strain rate were determined using the same software originally developed for LV28. LV twist, defined as absolute apex-to-base gradient rotation along the longitudinal axis of the LV, expressed in degrees, was assessed at the short-axis view at the mitral valve level, and the short-axis view at the apical level. Apical and basal rotations were measured, and LV twist was calculated as RotA-RotB. LV torsion was obtained by dividing LV twist to LV end-diastolic longitudinal length (degree/cm)31,32. LV untwist, a parameter of LV diastolic function, was measured, as well as untwist rate (degree/seconds), as the mean difference between the untwist curves. Finally, left and right atrial functions were also quantified33.

Real-time 3D-echocardiography was used to assess left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes, ejection fraction, cardiac output, left ventricular mass, and left ventricular strain, using the software 4DLVQ (“4D left ventricle quantification”). The 3 apical views were corrected to display standard 2-, 3-, and 4-chamber views, eliminating the foreshortening. The end-diastolic frame was automatically detected from the electrocardiogram, and three points (two for the mitral plane and one for the left ventricular apex) were defined manually for each of the three views, and the endocardial border was automatically traced. Then, the endocardial border was adjusted to obtain the optimal tracing. Time-volume curves were generated34,35.

Arterial function

Subjects were assessed after 10 minutes of rest in the supine position, in a constant room temperature, after 8–12 hours of fasting. Smoking, ingestion of vasoactive medication, caffeine and alcohol was not permitted 4–6 hours before the examination36. Blood pressure and heart rate were monitored. Intima-media thickness (IMT) was measured at the right common carotid artery, 1 cm below bifurcation, using Aloka Prosound α10 ultrasound machine (Japan), with a 7.5 MHz linear array probe. The far wall was used to measure mean IMT, and the final value was averaged from 3 different measurements37. The arterial stiffness was analyzed at the level of the right common carotid artery38. The machine allows measurement of flow velocity simultaneously with the artery diameter, using high-resolution online tracking wall (“E-tracking technology”). Arterial pressure waveforms were obtained, and 5 beats were signal-averaged to give a single waveform of diameter and velocity. Using this waveform, the following parameters were calculated: Peterson’s pressure-strain elastic modulus (Ep), β stiffness index, and local arterial compliance (AC). Augmentation index (Aix) was derived from the diameter-derived pressure waveform. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was measured by Complior System (Artech Medical, Pantin, France)39. Endothelial function was analyzed by flow mediated dilation, at the level of the right brachial artery, and expressed as a percentage of the baseline diameter40,41.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS software version 20 (IBM Statistics 20). Continuous variables were reported as mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables were reported as percentages. Independent samples T test was used to compare continuous variables, while chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables. Pearson’s correlation was used for the association between variables. Differences with p-values ≤ 0.05 (2-sided) were considered statistically significant. Good reproducibility and repeatability of vascular function parameters were reported previously in our laboratory in 20 consecutive patients by two observers with similar experience for IMT, PWV, and parameters of arterial stiffness41.

Figure 1
Figure 1

The 3-dimensional left ventricular ejection fraction (3D LVEF), 2-dimensional longitudinal strain (LS) and right ventricular strain (RVS) were lower in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) compared to control subjects (C).

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Fitzner, D. & Simons, M. Chronic progressive multiple sclerosis - pathogenesis of neurodegeneration and therapeutic strategies. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 8, 305–315, (2010).

  2. 2.

    Harbo, H. F., Gold, R. & Tintore, M. Sex and gender issues in multiple sclerosis. Ther. Adv. Neurol. Disord. 6, 237–248, (2013).

  3. 3.

    Mincu, R. I. et al. Cardiovascular Dysfunction in Multiple Sclerosis. Maedica (Buchar) 10, 364–370 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Jick, S. S., Li, L., Falcone, G. J., Vassilev, Z. P. & Wallander, M. A. Mortality of patients with multiple sclerosis: a cohort study in UK primary care. J. Neurol. 261, 1508–1517, (2014).

  5. 5.

    Manouchehrinia, A., Tanasescu, R., Tench, C. R. & Constantinescu, C. S. Mortality in multiple sclerosis: meta-analysis of standardised mortality ratios. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 87, 324–331, (2016).

  6. 6.

    Joyce, E. et al. Subclinical myocardial dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients remotely treated with mitoxantrone: evidence of persistent diastolic dysfunction. J. Card. Fail. 19, 571–576, (2013).

  7. 7.

    Kingwell, E. et al. Cardiotoxicity and other adverse events associated with mitoxantrone treatment for MS. Neurology 74, 1822–1826, (2010).

  8. 8.

    Akgul, F. et al. Subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol. Scand. 114, 114–118, (2006).

  9. 9.

    Mor-Avi, V. et al. Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 24, 277–313, (2011).

  10. 10.

    Comi, G., Radaelli, M. & Soelberg Sorensen, P. Evolving concepts in the treatment of relapsing multiple sclerosis. Lancet, (2016).

  11. 11.

    Goodin, D. S. The epidemiology of multiple sclerosis: insights to disease pathogenesis. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 122, 231–266, (2014).

  12. 12.

    Kang, J. H., Chen, Y. H. & Lin, H. C. Comorbidities amongst patients with multiple sclerosis: a population-based controlled study. Eur. J. Neurol. 17, 1215–1219, (2010).

  13. 13.

    Lalmohamed, A. et al. Causes of death in patients with multiple sclerosis and matched referent subjects: a population-based cohort study. Eur. J. Neurol. 19, 1007–1014, (2012).

  14. 14.

    Allen, N. B. et al. Vascular disease among hospitalized multiple sclerosis patients. Neuroepidemiology 30, 234–238, (2008).

  15. 15.

    Christiansen, C. F. et al. Risk of arterial cardiovascular diseases in patients with multiple sclerosis: a population-based cohort study. Neuroepidemiology 35, 267–274, (2010).

  16. 16.

    Finsterer, J., Stollberger, C. & Wahbi, K. Cardiomyopathy in neurological disorders. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 22, 389–400, (2013).

  17. 17.

    Finsterer, J. & Stollberger, C. Primary myopathies and the heart. Scand. Cardiovasc. J. 42, 9–24, (2008).

  18. 18.

    Witte, M. E., Mahad, D. J., Lassmann, H. & van Horssen, J. Mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis. Trends Mol. Med. 20, 179–187, (2014).

  19. 19.

    Sadeghian, M. et al. Mitochondrial dysfunction is an important cause of neurological deficits in an inflammatory model of multiple sclerosis. Sci. Rep. 6, 33249, (2016).

  20. 20.

    Adamczyk, B. & Adamczyk-Sowa, M. New Insights into the Role of Oxidative Stress Mechanisms in the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016, 1973834, (2016).

  21. 21.

    Polachini, C. R. et al. Alterations in the cholinesterase and adenosine deaminase activities and inflammation biomarker levels in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neuroscience 266, 266–274, (2014).

  22. 22.

    Sundstrom, P., Nystrom, L. & Hallmans, G. Smoke exposure increases the risk for multiple sclerosis. Eur. J. Neurol. 15, 579–583, (2008).

  23. 23.

    Marrie, R. A. et al. Rising prevalence of vascular comorbidities in multiple sclerosis: validation of administrative definitions for diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. Mult. Scler. 18, 1310–1319, (2012).

  24. 24.

    Polman, C. H. et al. Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria. Ann. Neurol. 69, 292–302, (2011).

  25. 25.

    Kurtzke, J. F. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 33, 1444–1452 (1983).

  26. 26.

    Lang, R. M. et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 28, 1–39.e14, (2015).

  27. 27.

    Nagueh, S. F. et al. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 29, 277–314, (2016).

  28. 28.

    Rudski, L. G. et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 23, 685–713, (2010). ; quiz 786-688.

  29. 29.

    Nagueh, S. F. et al. Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. Eur. Heart J. Cardiovasc. Imaging, (2016).

  30. 30.

    Amundsen, B. H. et al. Noninvasive myocardial strain measurement by speckle tracking echocardiography: validation against sonomicrometry and tagged magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 47, 789–793, (2006).

  31. 31.

    Notomi, Y. et al. Ventricular untwisting: a temporal link between left ventricular relaxation and suction. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 294, H505–513, (2008).

  32. 32.

    Sengupta, P. P., Tajik, A. J., Chandrasekaran, K. & Khandheria, B. K. Twist mechanics of the left ventricle: principles and application. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging 1, 366–376, (2008).

  33. 33.

    Cameli, M. et al. Feasibility and reference values of left atrial longitudinal strain imaging by two-dimensional speckle tracking. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound 7, 6, (2009).

  34. 34.

    Hansegard, J., Urheim, S., Lunde, K., Malm, S. & Rabben, S. I. Semi-automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound 7, 18, (2009).

  35. 35.

    Mor-Avi, V. et al. Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. 12, 167–205, (2011).

  36. 36.

    Swampillai, J., Rakebrandt, F., Morris, K., Jones, C. J. & Fraser, A. G. Acute effects of caffeine and tobacco on arterial function and wave travel. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 36, 844–849, (2006).

  37. 37.

    Bots, M. L. & Sutton-Tyrrell, K. Lessons from the past and promises for the future for carotid intima-media thickness. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 60, 1599–1604, (2012).

  38. 38.

    Vinereanu, D. et al. Conduit arterial stiffness is associated with impaired left ventricular subendocardial function. Heart 89, 449–450 (2003).

  39. 39.

    Mihalcea, D. J. et al. Comparison of pulse wave velocity assessed by three different techniques: Arteriograph, Complior, and Echo-tracking. Heart Vessels 31, 568–577, (2016).

  40. 40.

    Mincu, R. I. et al. Obstructive sleep apnea determines endothelial dysfunction and increased arterial stiffness, similarly with diabetes mellitus. Eur. Heart J. Suppl. 13, i50–i72 (2012).

  41. 41.

    Magda, S. L., Ciobanu, A. O., Florescu, M. & Vinereanu, D. Comparative reproducibility of the noninvasive ultrasound methods for the assessment of vascular function. Heart Vessels 28, 143–150, (2013).

Download references


This paper is partially supported by the Sectorial Operational Program Human Resources Development (SOPHRD), financed by the European Social Fund and the Romanian Government under the contract number POSDRU 141531. The sponsor had no role in the study design, in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the report or in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information


  1. University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania

    • Raluca Ileana Mincu
    • , Sorina Mihaila
    • , Maria Florescu
    • , Diana Janina Mihalcea
    • , Andreea Velcea
    • , Cristina Tiu
    • , Bogdan Ovidiu Popescu
    • , Mircea Cinteza
    •  & Dragos Vinereanu
  2. University and Emergency Hospital, Bucharest, Romania

    • Raluca Ileana Mincu
    • , Stefania Lucia Magda
    • , Sorina Mihaila
    • , Maria Florescu
    • , Cristina Tiu
    • , Mircea Cinteza
    •  & Dragos Vinereanu
  3. Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania

    • Adela Chiru
    •  & Bogdan Ovidiu Popescu


  1. Search for Raluca Ileana Mincu in:

  2. Search for Stefania Lucia Magda in:

  3. Search for Sorina Mihaila in:

  4. Search for Maria Florescu in:

  5. Search for Diana Janina Mihalcea in:

  6. Search for Andreea Velcea in:

  7. Search for Adela Chiru in:

  8. Search for Cristina Tiu in:

  9. Search for Bogdan Ovidiu Popescu in:

  10. Search for Mircea Cinteza in:

  11. Search for Dragos Vinereanu in:


R.I.M., C.T., B.O.P., M.C. and D.V. designed the study; R.I.M., S.L.M., S.M., M.F., A.V., D.M., A.C. performed the protocol examinations. R.I.M., S.L.M., M.C., D.V. analyzed and interpreted data. R.I.M., B.O.P., and D.V. wrote the main manuscript text. All authors reviewed and approved the version to be submitted.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dragos Vinereanu.

Electronic supplementary material


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit