Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Measurements of complex refractive index change of photoactive yellow protein over a wide wavelength range using hyperspectral quantitative phase imaging


A novel optical holographic technique is presented to simultaneously measure both the real and imaginary components of the complex refractive index (CRI) of a protein solution over a wide visible wavelength range. Quantitative phase imaging was employed to precisely measure the optical field transmitted from a protein solution, from which the CRIs of the protein solution were retrieved using the Fourier light scattering technique. Using this method, we characterized the CRIs of the two dominant structural states of a photoactive yellow protein solution over a broad wavelength range (461–582 nm). The significant CRI deviation between the two structural states was quantified and analysed. The results of both states show the similar overall shape of the expected rRI obtained from the Kramers–Kronig relations.


Light-matter interaction is key to the characterization of a sample and is performed using a diverse range of existing methodologies, including visual inspection, scattering analysis, microscopy, and spectroscopy. The light-matter interaction represents the composite of the electric and magnetic responses of material. It can be quantified by a single parameter called the complex refractive index (CRI) described by the expression

$$\,{\rm{CRI}}(\lambda )=\sqrt{[1+{\chi }_{e}(\lambda )][1+{\chi }_{m}(\lambda )]}=n(\lambda )+i\kappa (\lambda ).$$

Here, n and κ are the real and imaginary RIs, which describe reflection and transmission by bulk media, χ e and χ m are the electric and magnetic susceptibilities, and λ is the wavelength of light, respectively. The real and the imaginary parts (n and κ) have extensively used separately as refractive index and extinction coefficient, respectively. As in Eq. (1), the CRI is a complex value that characterizes the electromagnetic response of the matter. The CRI has been importantly utilized in physical chemistry, analytical chemistry, and structural biology, where light is used as a probe1,2,3,4,5,6,7.

In particular, direct measurement of the CRIs of proteins is of great interest to biophysical chemists and because the CRI of a protein is related to its chromophore structure and chromophore environment. As an example, circular dichroism spectroscopy, which analyses the CRI difference between the two circular polarizations of light, has been utilized to determine the secondary structures of proteins8 and ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometry, which measures the imaginary part of the CRI (molar extinction coefficient) has been utilized to determine the protein concentration or property9.

Unfortunately, despite their powerful molecular characterization capabilities, direct measurement of the CRIs of protein solutions over a wide range of wavelengths has been hindered by limitations in existing instruments. Generally, the real part (rRI) and imaginary part (iRI) of the CRI can be separately measured using a reflectometer and an absorption spectrometer, respectively; however, the simultaneous measurement has been hardly realized. Simultaneous CRI measurement would be highly preferable for protein studies with the capability of performing spectroscopic measurements because the proteins are sensitive to surrounding environment such as temperature, pH, and ion concentrations, which may be perturbed during each individual measurement10,11,12,13. Simultaneous CRI measurement is crucial especially for proteins that undergo conformational changes upon specific modulations because CRI can be used as a non-invasive and quantitative reporter for the alterations in proteins. Alternatively, Kramers–Kronig (K–K) relations can be utilized to estimate the rRI from the measured iRI or vice versa. However, the K–K relations have a severe quantification problem unless the detection wavelength range is sufficiently broad. Spectroscopic ellipsometry can also be used to measure the CRI components simultaneously; however, the target sample needs to be a uniform thin film of known thickness14. Thus, generally, the ellipsometry technique is primarily used to observe protein adsorption kinetics, rather than for the optical characterization of protein solutions15.

In order to simultaneously measure the CRI components of a protein solution, we employed quantitative phase imaging (QPI) for measurement, and Fourier transform light scattering (FTLS) techniques16 for analysis of the QPI data. QPI uses the principle of holography to quantitatively and precisely measure both the optical attenuation and phase delay images when light passes through the sample. In other words, QPI uses the optical field image of a sample, which is directly related to the sample’s CRI17,18. The optical field images of both non-biological and biological samples, including colloidal particles19,20, red blood cells21,22, neurons23,24, and tissues25,26, have been successfully measured using QPI techniques. FTLS converts the measured optical field images into light scattering information using numerical far-field propagation16. Unlike conventional scattering analysis of bulk samples, FTLS specializes in light scattering analysis of individual microscopic samples, such as microspheres27,28,29, colloidal particles19, red blood cells21,30,31, bacteria32,33, and tissues16. In this work, we induce light scattering inside the protein solution by immersing a known microsphere in the target solution. Because the light scattering information is highly sensitive to the CRI of the surrounding medium, the CRI of the protein solution can be calculated precisely from the light scattering information using Mie theory34.

Using this method, we measured the CRI as a function of wavelengths of both a photoactive yellow protein (PYP) and its excited state by illumination with a blue light35,36,37,38. PYP is a protein related to phototaxis signal transduction in Halorhodospira halophila. PYP has been extensively investigated using various spectroscopic techniques because it serves as an important model system for the study of the relation between structural change and the signal transduction process39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46. PYP is also of interest as a photoresponsive module with potential as an optogenetic tool or artificial protein machine because of its small molecular size (125 amino acids, 14 kDa), high solubility, and photoactivity coupled with large structural change. The chromophore of PYP, deprotonated p-coumaric acid, absorbs blue light and demonstrates the conformational change cycle. When irradiated with blue light, the ground state of PYP (pG, λmax = 446 nm; see Supplementary Fig. S3), which has trans-p-coumaric acid as a chromophore, is photo-isomerized to red-shifted intermediate pR1 and pR2 states (λmax = 465 nm). The pR1 and pR2 decay with timescales on the order of microseconds and hundreds of microseconds, respectively, into blue-shifted intermediate pB1, which further transforms into another blue-shifted intermediate pB2 (λmax = 355 nm), with cis-p-coumaric acid as the chromophore47. Finally, the pB2, which is the putative signaling state of PYP, returns to the pG state on hundreds of milliseconds time scale, and the photocycle ends. Amongst the several other intermediates of PYP, pB2 shows the largest conformational change and the longest relaxation time during the photocycle42,43,44,46. Because the relaxation times of the other intermediate states between pG and pB2 are comparatively short, the time-averaged excited PYP state can be simply regarded as a pure pB2 state. Therefore, for the rest of this paper, we simply denote the ground and excited states of PYP as the pG and pB states, respectively.

Though the absorption spectrum or iRI has been one of the most popular spectroscopic probes, the rRI of PYP has not been extensively studied and only estimated qualitatively48. In this work, we precisely quantify the rRI and iRI simultaneously for both the pG and pB states of PYP solution, using the proposed holographic techniques.


Experimental procedure

In order to obtain the CRI of PYP, we first measured the multi-wavelength light field images of a 100-μm-diameter polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) microsphere immersed in PYP solution (Fig. 1). The illumination wavelength for the optical field measurement (probe beam) is systemically scanned over a broad visible spectral range. The centre wavelength and bandwidth of the probe beams are defined by the prism, lens, and pinhole used in the illumination12. For optical field measurements, a quantitative phase imaging unit (QPIU)49 was implemented. The QPIU is a common-path full-field interferometer that uses the principle of lateral shearing interferometry (see Supplementary Fig. S1 online for the detailed optical setup).

Figure 1

Experimental procedure for measuring the CRI of PYP solution. (a) A conceptual schematic of the measurements. The optical field of a microsphere immersed in PYP solution is obtained over a broad range of visible wavelengths; left, in the absence of a pump beam (pump-off); right, in the presence of a pump beam (pump-on), where most PYP converts to the excited state (pB). (b) Raw hologram of a PYP solution without (left) and with (right) the pump beam. (c) Measured amplitude and (d) phase images of microspheres immersed in the PYP solution. (e) Retrieved FTLS results of the PYP solution in pump-off (red) and pump-on (green) cases. The solid and dotted lines represent the experimental results and theoretical (Mie theory) fitting, respectively. Inset, FLTS results within the smaller scattering angle range.

The measurements were performed with and without the pump beam (445 nm peak; M455L3, Thorlabs Inc.) to measure the CRI of both the pG and pB states. To ensure state equilibrium of the PYP solution, we included sufficient idle time (>10 seconds) after switching the LED on or off before taking holograms. For each state, we obtained holograms at eleven different wavelengths ranging from 461 to 582 nm. The wavelengths were carefully selected to fully characterize the CRI of the PYP solution (see Supplementary Table S1 and Fig. S2 for detailed probe beam specifications). The nonlinear effects from the probe beam were negligible, and the intensities of probe beams were normalized in the data analysing process.

From each measured raw holographic image (Fig. 1b), the amplitude and phase images of the immersed microsphere were obtained with a conventional field retrieval algorithm (Fig. 1c,d)50. The retrieved light field images were converted into angle-resolved light scattering plots using FTLS, as shown in Fig. 1e. In FTLS, the measured optical field of a sample is numerically propagated to the far-field, which creates a direct 2D Fourier transformation of the optical field information of the sample. The angle-resolved light scattering plots are achieved by azimuthally averaging the 2D light scattering patterns, which greatly increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the measurements. As the spatial analogous to Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, FTLS provides an unprecedented SNR in measuring scattered light signals owing to Fellgett’s advantage51. The azimuthal averaging is possible because the imaging target (a microsphere) is azimuthally symmetric. Then, the CRI was extracted by fitting the obtained FTLS results to the Mie scattering theory, which is the exact solution to Maxwell’s equations for light scattering from homogeneous spheres52,53.

CRI of PYP solutions in pG and pB states

The CRI values of both the pG and pB states of the PYP solution are shown in Fig. 2. The precision or standard deviation of the proposed method at each wavelength is depicted by the error bars. The mean precisions of the rRI and iRI are 8.2 × 10−5, and 4.2 × 10−5, respectively. The decrease in accuracy with increasing wavelength is caused by the bandwidth widening of the probe beam, which reduces the interference efficiency.

Figure 2

Measured CRI and refractive index increment of PYP solution. (a) The red line represents the iRI value of the PYP solution in the absence of pump beam illumination (pump-off). The green line represents the iRI value of the PYP solution in the presence of pump beam illumination (pump-on). The grey dotted line represents the fitted graphs of both of these values, based on Eq. (2). Corresponding concentrations of the ground state PYP are indicated in brackets on each line. (b) The rRI values of the PYP solution in the pump-off (red) and pump-on (green) environments. The grey dotted line represents the rRI result for a pump-off PYP solution obtained from a conventional refractometer for comparison. The inset shows the result after subtracting the rRI of distilled water from the PYP solution. (c) Refractive index increment (α) of pG (black) and pB (blue) states. The error bars indicate the standard deviation from five measurements with different microspheres immersed in identical PYP solutions.

The iRI of the PYP decreases monotonically as the wavelength increases (Fig. 2a) and converges to zero for wavelengths longer than 500 nm. The iRI values in the presence of the pump beam (pump−on case) are approximately five times smaller than those of the PYP in the absence of the pump beam (pump−off case). The significant decrease in the iRI in the pump-on case indicates a PYP population transition from the pG to the pB state. Since the absorbance of pB is negligible for the current wavelength range (see Supplementary Fig. S3), we deduce that the non-zero iRI in the pump-on case is caused by the presence of a pG population. Therefore, the molecular density or concentration of pG (ρ pG ) can be determined simply by

$$\,i{\rm{RI}}({\rho }_{pG},{\lambda }_{b})=\frac{{\rm{l}}{\rm{n}}(10)}{4\pi }{\rho }_{pG}{\lambda }_{b}\varepsilon ({\lambda }_{b}),$$

where λ b is the wavelength of the probe beam and ε is the known molecular extinction coefficient of pG. The ρ pG were measured as 3.44 ± 0.1 mM and 0.56 ± 0.1 mM for the pump−off and pump−on cases, respectively (Fig. 2a). Thus, the concentration of the pB state is found to be 2.88 ± 0.1 mM, and the pB population ratio (R pB  = amount of pB/amount of pG) is 0.837 ± 0.035. Because a continuous light source was used as the pumping source, R pB  = 1 is not achievable in this two-state equilibrium system54. A previous report that used LEDs for continuous illumination showed a similar R pB 55.

The rRI values of the PYP decrease monotonically as the wavelength increases (Fig. 2b), which is a general phenomenon occurring in protein solutions due to the rRI of water. For a wavelength ranging from 461–582 nm, the rRI in the pump−off case decreased from 1.3518 to 1.3452, and the rRI in the pump−on case decreased from 1.3510 to 1.3450. The pump−on case shows lower rRI values than the pump−off case for the entire wavelength range. Unlike the iRI values, the quantitative rRI values have not been reported previously. Therefore, we verified the measured rRI values using a conventional refractometer (R-5000, ATAGO Co., Ltd). The verification was conducted with an identically prepared PYP solution in the pump-off case. The rRI values cannot be measured for short wavelength probes, owing to their lower intensities. The verification results are shown by the dotted grey lines in Fig. 2b, where the error bars indicate the minimum scale of the refractometer.

Similar to the iRI in Eq. (2), the rRI is also a function of molecular density. In order to characterize the PYP independent of the molecular density, we calculated the refractive index increment; that is, the density derivative of the real RI (\(\partial r{\rm{RI}}/\partial \rho \)). The refractive index increment of the PYP in the pG and pB states can be calculated individually using the linear equation:

$$\,[\begin{array}{c}r{{\rm{RI}}}_{pump-off}(\lambda )\\ r{{\rm{RI}}}_{pump-on}(\lambda )\end{array}]=(\begin{array}{cc}0 & {\rho }_{pG,pump-off}\\ {\rho }_{pB,pump-on} & {\rho }_{pG,pump-on}\end{array})[\begin{array}{c}{\alpha }_{pB}(\lambda )\\ {\alpha }_{pG}(\lambda )\end{array}]+r{{\rm{RI}}}_{{H}_{2}O}(\lambda ),$$

where ρ pG and ρ pB correspond to the molecular densities of the pG and pB states in the pump-on or pump–off cases, as denoted by the subscript; \({\alpha }_{pG}\) and \({\alpha }_{pB}\) are the refractive index increments (\(\partial r{\rm{RI}}/\partial \rho \)) of the PYP in the pG and pB states, respectively; \(r{{\rm{RI}}}_{pump-off}\) and \(r{{\rm{RI}}}_{pump-on}\) are the rRI values of the PYP solution in the pump-off and pump-on cases, respectively; and \(r{{\rm{RI}}}_{{H}_{2}O}\) is the known rRI of distilled water56. The results are shown in Fig. 2c and tabulated in Supplementary Table S2. The difference between \({\alpha }_{pG}\) and \({\alpha }_{pB}\) was maximized (approx. 0.3 M−1) at 470 nm, and decreased as the wavelength increased.

The pB population ratio (R pB ) of a state is related to the kinetics of the transition between the pG and pB states of the PYP. The relaxation time τ of the pB state to pG state can be obtained from the measured R pB with the following equation (see Supplementary Information for details)57,58.

$$\frac{1}{\tau }=\,\mathrm{ln}(10)(\frac{1-{R}_{pB}}{{R}_{pB}})\frac{\varphi }{{N}_{A}hc}\int \varepsilon ({\lambda }_{P}){\lambda }_{P}\frac{\partial {I}_{P}}{\partial {\lambda }_{P}}d{\lambda }_{P},$$

where h is Planck’s constant, N A is Avogadro’s constant, λ P is the wavelength of the pump light, ϕ is the photocycle quantum yield of PYP, and ∂I P /λ P is the spectral density of the pump beam. Inserting ϕ = 0.35 from the literature59,60 and ∂I P /∂λ P (see Supplementary Fig. S2) and R pB  = 0.837 ± 0.035 from the measurement, τ was calculated to be 77 ± 27 ms. We note that the relaxation time determined here is smaller than those reported by typical time-resolved pump-probe experiments (0.15–2 s)44,61,62. The discrepancy may be related to the different modes of data collection (continuous illumination vs. pump-probe), but the exact origin is not clear at this stage. The accuracy of this calculated τ is mainly determined from the uncertainty of R pB due to the high R pB sensitivity of τ in Eq. (4).


The deviation in the iRI between the two structural states of the PYP is to be expected caused by the well-known different extinction coefficients between two states. The rRI, however, is a quantity that relates to the mass or density of the material63,64. Because only conformational change, not mass variation, occurred when the pump beam was turned on or off, the deviation in the rRI can be considered to arise from density variations resulting from the conformational change.

To explain the results of these measurements, we employ the K–K relations. The K–K relations connect the rRI and iRI based on the causality of the response functions. The K–K relations allow for calculation of the rRI from the iRI by

$$r{\rm{RI}}(\omega )=1+P{\int }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }\frac{d\omega ^{\prime} }{\pi }\frac{i\mathrm{RI}(\omega ^{\prime} )}{\omega ^{\prime} -\omega }$$

or vice versa. Here, ω is the angular frequency of light. Although the K–K relations do not provide an exact quantitative solution due to their inherent infinite-integral form, we are still able to obtain qualitative trends for the rRI from the well-known values of the iRI. The calculated results are shown in Fig. 3. The overall shape of the expected rRI obtained from the K–K relations matches well with the experimental results of both the pump-on and pump-off cases and shows the largest deviation at a wavelength of 470 nm, in agreement with our result. In order to retrieve the reliable rRI results from the K–K relations, we find that the nearest absorption peaks should be considered at least. In this works, we expect iRI measurements over 250 nm – 2,000 nm is required for reliable rRI results, regarding the second absorption peak of PYP (280 nm)65 and water absorption peaks in infrared regime66.

Figure 3

Comparison between calculated ΔrRI trends of the PYP based on the K–K relations (dotted lines) and measurements (solid lines). The solid lines are identical to the inset in Fig. 2b. The red and green curves indicate the case in the absence (pump-off) and the presence (pump-on) of the pump beam, respectively. The y-axis offset of the dotted lines is set discretionarily because of the ambiguity arising from the integral forms of the K–K relations.

To provide a more intuitive explanation for the rRI deviation resulting from the molecular structure change, we introduce the concept of atomic refraction (AR). Historically, AR studies have tabulated the contribution of individual atoms and atomic bonding to the rRI of a molecule, and in this way have been able to closely predict the rRI of unknown chemicals67,68,69. By considering the AR as a microscopic version of our preconception about the relationship between the rRI and density/mass, the deviation in the rRI resulting from molecular structure changes can be explained. Further, the AR implies that the rRI results may help to reveal atomic bonding changes that occur during the protein conformational change.

The relation between the CRI and electromagnetic susceptibilities [Eq. (1)]70 should be emphasized once again. Because the susceptibilities of molecules strongly relate to their electric and magnetic dipole moments, measurements of the CRI can provide clues to protein structure. For example, Tamasaku et al. visualized the electron cloud distributions of diamonds with a resolution of 0.54 Å by using extreme-ultraviolet (103 Å–206 Å) light, and the non-linear susceptibility relationship between X-rays and the chosen frequencies71. However, in the current study, the CRI measurements of PYP proteins were performed in solution which makes it challenging to directly translate our CRI measurements into structural changes in the PYP. This is because proteins in solution have arbitrary orientations, which result in the smoothing of directional information. When the directional- and/or polarization-dependent CRIs or the electromagnetic susceptibilities of proteins are measured systematically, they have the potential to provide more useful information on the structure of proteins.


In this work, we presented a method to precisely and quantitatively measure the CRIs of photoactive proteins and their excited states over a wide range of wavelengths. Using a QPI equipped with a wavelength-sweeping source and FTLS, the CRIs of the PYP solution were measured for wavelengths ranging from 461–582 nm.

We found a significant difference in the CRI values of PYP for the absence of a pump beam (pump-off case) and the presence of a pump beam (pump-on case) as a function of wavelength; not only for the iRI, but also for the rRI. We retrieved the refractive index increment values of PYP for both the pG and pB states. The maximum difference between \({\alpha }_{pG}\) and \({\alpha }_{pB}\) is approx. 0.3 M−1 at 470 nm. We also explained the reason for the unexpected deviation in rRI by employing the K–K relation and atomic refraction. We expect the extension of measurable wavelength in the UV regime will help the direct examination of the CRI changes in pB states.

The present method measures both the rRI and iRI values of photoactive proteins simultaneously over a wide wavelength range, and it will be useful for real-time measurements as well as adding to the body of comprehensive, precise, and quantitative information on light-matter interactions. We also expect the present method to see widespread application in measuring the CRIs of photoactive proteins in various fields, including structural biology, chemistry, medical science, and pharmacy. Furthermore, precise measurement of the CRI can provide insight into the application of photoactive proteins in the field of material science and optics.


Sample preparation

The purified PYP solution (see Supplementary Information) was mixed with PMMA microspheres having a diameter of 100 μm (74214 FLUKA, Sigma-Aldrich, Inc.) that had been washed three times with distilled water. Ten microliters of the mixture were sandwiched between the coverslips, and the edges were sealed with epoxy adhesive.

CRI extraction by Mie theory fitting

To determine the CRI of the PYP solution, we performed nonlinear fitting of the measured FTLS signals using the Mie theory (Fig. 1e). The solution describes the scattering of an electromagnetic plane wave by a homogeneous sphere. We used three fitting parameters: the rRI (n) and the iRI (κ) of the PYP solution, and the diameter of the PMMA microspheres. For a robust and automated fitting analysis, the angle-resolved light scattering signals were prepared as a function of \(n\,\sin \,\theta \) instead of θ in order to ensure the same scale for the horizontal axes while adjusting the rRI (n) value because light scattering is dependent on refractive index. During this experiment, we took a photographic image of the microsphere and its surroundings using a CCD camera. We discovered that moving further away from the microsphere’s centre caused the thickness of the PYP solution to increase, causing the CRI to change in response.

Due to the highly oscillatory features of the angle-resolved light scattering curves (Fig. 1e), the direct application of conventional fitting algorithms either shows non-convergent results or is dependent on the initial fitting parameters. Instead, we used a process prior to the fitting processes to find appropriate initial fitting parameters by minimizing the total variance of the extreme positions between the measurement and the Mie theory. These initial parameters yield highly reproducible fitting results. Thereafter, we used a nonlinear fitting algorithm (nlinfit, a built-in function of MatLabTM) with these predetermined initial fitting parameters. We expect the fitting method can be further simplified by employing global optimization algorithms such as genetic algorithms72.

PMMA microspheres CRI calibration

Mie scattering is highly dependent on the CRI of both the surrounding medium and the homogeneous sphere. In order to measure the CRI of the PYP solution, the CRI of the PMMA microspheres used should be well-known. However, we found that the CRI of polymers such as PMMA can slightly vary product-by-product, depending on the manufacturing procedure. Therefore, the CRI of the PMMA microspheres should be calibrated beforehand.

For the calibration, we used an identical experimental procedure with PMMA microspheres immersed in distilled water, whose CRI value is known56. The fitting parameters were the rRI, the iRI, and the diameter of the PMMA microsphere. The calibrated CRI of the PMMA microsphere was used for the known parameters in the PYP solution CRI measurements.


  1. 1.

    Bailey, R. C., Nam, J.-M., Mirkin, C. A. & Hupp, J. T. Real-time multicolor DNA detection with chemoresponsive diffraction gratings and nanoparticle probes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 125, 13541–13547 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Löper, P. et al. Complex refractive index spectra of CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite thin films determined by spectroscopic ellipsometry and spectrophotometry. J. Phys. Chem. Lett 6, 66–71 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Saha, S., Sinha, T. & Mookerjee, A. Electronic structure, chemical bonding, and optical properties of paraelectric BaTiO 3. Phys Rev B 62, 8828 (2000).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kim, J. Y., Hwang, M. S., Kim, Y.-H., Kim, H. J. & Lee, Y. Origin of low dielectric constant of carbon-incorporated silicon oxide film deposited by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Journal of Applied Physics 90, 2469–2473 (2001).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Sokolik, I., Andronova, A. & Johnson, T. C. Complex refractive index of atmospheric dust aerosols. Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics 27, 2495–2502 (1993).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Jung, J., Jang, J. & Park, Y. Spectro-refractometry of individual microscopic objects using swept-source quantitative phase imaging. Anal. Chem, (2013).

  7. 7.

    Jung, J. et al. Biomedical applications of holographic microspectroscopy [Invited]. Applied Optics 53, G111–G122 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Whitmore, L. & Wallace, B. A. Protein secondary structure analyses from circular dichroism spectroscopy: methods and reference databases. Biopolymers 89, 392–400 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Walker, J. M. The Protein Protocols Handbook. (Humana Press, 2009).

  10. 10.

    Shevchuk, A. I. et al. Simultaneous Measurement of Ca2+ and Cellular Dynamics: Combined Scanning Ion Conductance and Optical Microscopy to Study Contracting Cardiac Myocytes. Biophysical Journal 81, 1759–1764 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Inoue, I., Shiomi, D., Kawagishi, I. & Yasuda, K. Simultaneous measurement of sensor-protein dynamics and motility of a single cell by on-chip microcultivation system. Journal of Nanobiotechnology 2, 4 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bajaj, H., Sharma, V. K. & Kalonia, D. S. Determination of Second Virial Coefficient of Proteins Using a Dual-Detector Cell for Simultaneous Measurement of Scattered Light Intensity and Concentration in SEC-HPLC. Biophysical Journal 87, 4048–4055 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Streets, A. M., Sourigues, Y., Kopito, R. R., Melki, R. & Quake, S. R. Simultaneous Measurement of Amyloid Fibril Formation by Dynamic Light Scattering and Fluorescence Reveals Complex Aggregation Kinetics. PLOS ONE 8, e54541 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Fujiwara, H. Spectroscopic ellipsometry: principles and applications. (John Wiley & Sons, 2007).

  15. 15.

    Elwing, H. Protein absorption and ellipsometry in biomaterial research. Biomaterials 19, 397–406 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ding, H., Wang, Z., Nguyen, F., Boppart, S. A. & Popescu, G. Fourier transform light scattering of inhomogeneous and dynamic structures. Physical review letters 101, 238102 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Lee, K. et al. Quantitative phase imaging techniques for the study of cell pathophysiology: from principles to applications. Sensors 13, 4170–4191 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Popescu, G. Quantitative Phase Imaging of Cells and Tissues. (McGraw-Hill Professional, 2011).

  19. 19.

    Yu, H., Park, H., Kim, Y., Kim, M. W. & Park, Y. Fourier-transform light scattering of individual colloidal clusters. Optics Letters 37, 2577–2579 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Park, J., Yu, H., Park, J.-H. & Park, Y. LCD panel characterization by measuring full Jones matrix of individual pixels using polarization-sensitive digital holographic microscopy. Optics Express 22, 24304–24311 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Park, Y. et al. Metabolic remodeling of the human red blood cell membrane. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 1289 (2010).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Park, Y. et al. Measurement of red blood cell mechanics during morphological changes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 6731 (2010).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Mir, M. et al. Label-free characterization of emerging human neuronal networks. Scientific reports 4, (2014).

  24. 24.

    Jourdain, P. et al. Determination of transmembrane water fluxes in neurons elicited by glutamate ionotropic receptors and by the cotransporters KCC2 and NKCC1: a digital holographic microscopy study. The Journal of Neuroscience 31, 11846–11854 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wang, Z., Tangella, K., Balla, A. & Popescu, G. Tissue refractive index as marker of disease. Journal of biomedical optics 16, 116017–1160177 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lee, M. et al. Label-free optical quantification of structural alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Scientific Reports 6, 31034 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Kim, K. & Park, Y. Fourier-transform light scattering angular spectroscopy using digital in-line holography. Opt Lett 37, 4161–4163 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lee, K. et al. Synthetic Fourier transform light scattering. Opt Express 21, 22453–22463 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jung, J. & Park, Y. Spectro-angular light scattering measurements of individual microscopic objects. Opt Express 22, 4108–4114 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Park, Y. et al. Measurement of the nonlinear elasticity of red blood cell membranes. Physical Review E 83, 051925 (2011).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Kim, Y., Kim, K. & Park, Y. In Blood Cell - An Overview of Studies in Hematology (ed. Terry E. Moschandreou) Ch. 10, 167–194 (INTECH, 2012).

  32. 32.

    Jo, Y. et al. Angle-resolved light scattering of individual rod-shaped bacteria based on Fourier transform light scattering. Scientific reports 4, 5090 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Jo, Y. et al. Label-free identification of individual bacteria using Fourier transform light scattering. Optics Express 23, 15792–15805 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Hulst, H. C. v. d. Light scattering by small particles. (Dover Publications, 1981).

  35. 35.

    Kumauchi, M., Hara, M. T., Stalcup, P., Xie, A. & Hoff, W. D. Identification of six new photoactive yellow proteins–diversity and structure-function relationships in a bacterial blue light photoreceptor. Photochem Photobiol 84, 956–969 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    McRee, D. E., Meyer, T. E., Cusanovich, M. A., Parge, H. E. & Getzoff, E. D. Crystallographic characterization of a photoactive yellow protein with photochemistry similar to sensory rhodopsin. J Biol Chem 261, 13850–13851 (1986).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Sprenger, W. W., Hoff, W. D., Armitage, J. P. & Hellingwerf, K. J. The eubacterium Ectothiorhodospira halophila is negatively phototactic, with a wavelength dependence that fits the absorption spectrum of the photoactive yellow protein. J Bacteriol 175, 3096–3104 (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Imamoto, Y., Ito, T., Kataoka, M. & Tokunaga, F. Reconstitution photoactive yellow protein from apoprotein and p-coumaric acid derivatives. Febs Lett 374, 157–160 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kim, T. W. et al. Combined probes of X-ray scattering and optical spectroscopy reveal how global conformational change is temporally and spatially linked to local structural perturbation in photoactive yellow protein. Phys Chem Chem Phys 18, 8911–8919 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Kaila, V. R. I., Schotte, F., Cho, H. S., Hummer, G. & Anfinrud, P. A. Contradictions in X-ray structures of intermediates in the photocycle of photoactive yellow protein. Nature Chemistry 6, 258–259 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jung, Y. O. et al. Reply to ‘Contradictions in X-ray structures of intermediates in the photocycle of photoactive yellow protein’. Nature Chemistry 6, 259–260 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kim, Y., Ganesan, P. & Ihee, H. High-throughput instant quantification of protein expression and purity based on photoactive yellow protein turn off/on label. Protein Sci 22, 1109–1117 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jung, Y. O. et al. Volume-conserving trans-cis isomerization pathways in photoactive yellow protein visualized by picosecond X-ray crystallography. Nat Chem 5, 212–220 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kim, T. W. et al. Protein structural dynamics of photoactive yellow protein in solution revealed by pump-probe X-ray solution scattering. J Am Chem Soc 134, 3145–3153 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Ramachandran, P. L. et al. The Short-Lived Signaling State of the Photoactive Yellow Protein Photoreceptor Revealed by Combined Structural Probes. Journal of the American Chemical Society 133, 9395–9404 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Ihee, H. et al. Visualizing reaction pathways in photoactive yellow protein from nanoseconds to seconds. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 7145–7150 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Changenet-Barret, P., Espagne, A., Plaza, P., Hellingwerf, K. J. & Martin, M. M. Investigations of the primary events in a bacterial photoreceptor for photomotility: photoactive yellow protein (PYP). New J Chem 29, 527–534 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Vanhanen, J. et al. Nonlinear refractive index change of photoactive yellow protein. Optics communications 155, 327–331 (1998).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lee, K. & Park, Y. Quantitative phase imaging unit. Optics Letters 39, 3630–3633 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Debnath, S. K. & Park, Y. Real-time quantitative phase imaging with a spatial phase-shifting algorithm. Optics Letters 36, 4677–4679 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Fellgett, P. On the ultimate sensitivity and practical performance of radiation detectors. JOSA 39, 970–976 (1949).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Bohren, C. F. & Huffman, D. R. Absorption and scattering of light by small particles. (Wiley, 1983).

  53. 53.

    Schäfer, J., Lee, S. C. & Kienle, A. Calculation of the near fields for the scattering of electromagnetic waves by multiple infinite cylinders at perpendicular incidence. Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 113, 2113–2123 (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Zwanzig, R. Two-state models of protein folding kinetics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 94, 148–150 (1997).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    George, D. K. et al. Photoactive Yellow Protein Terahertz Response: Hydration, Heating and Intermediate States. Ieee T Thz Sci Techn 3, 288–294 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Ma, X. et al. Determination of complex refractive index of polystyrene microspheres from 370 to 1610 nm. Physics in medicine and biology 48, 4165 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Cohen, B., Crespo-Hernandez, C. E. & Kohler, B. Strickler-Berg analysis of excited singlet state dynamics in DNA and RNA nucleosides. Faraday Discussions 127, 137–147 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Strickler, S. J. Citation Classic - Relationship between Absorption Intensity and Fluorescence Lifetime of Molecules. Current Contents/Physical Chemical & Earth Sciences, 18-18, (1981).

  59. 59.

    van Brederode, M. E., Gensch, T., Hoff, W. D., Hellingwerf, K. J. & Braslavsky, S. E. Photoinduced volume change and energy storage associated with the early transformations of the photoactive yellow protein from Ectothiorhodospira halophila. Biophysical Journal 68, 1101–1109 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Takeshita, K. et al. Structural change of site-directed mutants of PYP: new dynamics during pR state. Biophys J 83, 1567–1577 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Yeremenko, S., van Stokkum, I. H., Moffat, K. & Hellingwerf, K. J. Influence of the crystalline state on photoinduced dynamics of photoactive yellow protein studied by ultraviolet-visible transient absorption spectroscopy. Biophys J 90, 4224–4235 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hoff, W. D. et al. Measurement and global analysis of the absorbance changes in the photocycle of the photoactive yellow protein from Ectothiorhodospira halophila. Biophys J 67, 1691–1705 (1994).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Zhao, H., Brown, P. H. & Schuck, P. On the distribution of protein refractive index increments. Biophys J 100, 2309–2317 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Popescu, G. et al. Optical imaging of cell mass and growth dynamics. American Journal of Physiology - Cell physiology 295, C538–544 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Carroll, E. C., Hospes, M., Valladares, C., Hellingwerf, K. J. & Larsen, D. S. Is the photoactive yellow protein a UV-B/blue light photoreceptor? Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 10, 464–468 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Hale, G. M. & Querry, M. R. Optical Constants of Water in the 200-nm to 200-μm Wavelength Region. Appl. Opt. 12, 555–563 (1973).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Swientoslawski, W. ATOMIC REFRACTION. Journal of the American Chemical Society 42, 1945–1951 (1920).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Meurant, G. Advances in Physical Organic Chemistry. (Elsevier Science, 1965).

  69. 69.

    Batsanov, S. S. & Batsanov, A. S. Introduction to Structural Chemistry. (Springer Netherlands, 2012).

  70. 70.

    Kim, T. K., Zuo, X. B., Tiede, D. M. & Ihee, H. Exploring fine structures of photoactive yellow protein in solution using wide-angle X-ray scattering. B Kor Chem Soc 25, 1676–1680 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Tamasaku, K., Sawada, K., Nishibori, E. & Ishikawa, T. Visualizing the local optical response to extreme-ultraviolet radiation with a resolution of [lambda]/380. Nat Phys 7, 705–708 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Goldberg, D. & Holland, J. Genetic Algorithms and Machine Learning. Machine Learning 3, 95–99 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by Institute of Basic Science (IBS-R004-A1), KAIST, BK21 + program, Tomocube, and the National Research Foundation of Korea (2015R1A3A2066550, 2017M3C1A3013923, 2014K1A3A1A09063027).

Author information




Y.-K.P. and H.I. conceived and supervised the study. Y.K. prepared the samples. K.R.L. and Y.K. performed the optical measurements and analysed the data. J.H.H. built the optical setup and provided the analysis tool. All authors discussed the experimental results and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hyotcherl Ihee or YongKeun Park.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, K., Kim, Y., Jung, J. et al. Measurements of complex refractive index change of photoactive yellow protein over a wide wavelength range using hyperspectral quantitative phase imaging. Sci Rep 8, 3064 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing