Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Recent inner ear specialization for high-speed hunting in cheetahs


The cheetah, Acinonyx jubatus, is the fastest living land mammal. Because of its specialized hunting strategy, this species evolved a series of specialized morphological and functional body features to increase its exceptional predatory performance during high-speed hunting. Using high-resolution X-ray computed micro-tomography (μCT), we provide the first analyses of the size and shape of the vestibular system of the inner ear in cats, an organ essential for maintaining body balance and adapting head posture and gaze direction during movement in most vertebrates. We demonstrate that the vestibular system of modern cheetahs is extremely different in shape and proportions relative to other cats analysed (12 modern and two fossil felid species), including a closely-related fossil cheetah species. These distinctive attributes (i.e., one of the greatest volumes of the vestibular system, dorsal extension of the anterior and posterior semicircular canals) correlate with a greater afferent sensitivity of the inner ear to head motions, facilitating postural and visual stability during high-speed prey pursuit and capture. These features are not present in the fossil cheetah A. pardinensis, that went extinct about 126,000 years ago, demonstrating that the unique and highly specialized inner ear of the sole living species of cheetah likely evolved extremely recently, possibly later than the middle Pleistocene.


The cheetah Acinonyx jubatus is a large, anatomically-specialized, cursorial felid carnivoran, and the fastest living land mammal. Over short distances, cheetahs can reach a maximum speed of 25.9–29 m/s1,2. The species usually hunts swift ungulates such as gazelles, antelopes, and impalas by chasing them at high speeds, knocking them over, and biting their throats until they suffocate3,4. Given its lightly-built body compared to other felids, the cheetah captures medium-sized prey, weighing only 23 to 56 kg on average, which limits the risk of injuries and provides enough time for the animal to eat before the arrival of kleptoparasites such as lions, leopards, hyaenas or vultures4,5. Because of this distinctive hunting strategy, the species evolved an array of morphological characteristics related to fast motion and enhanced predatory performance3,6,7,8,9. The genome sequence of cheetahs also revealed positive selection of genes mediating energy metabolism and regulating muscle contraction, involved in their high-speed adaptations10.

No prior study has investigated the sensory capacities of cheetahs through analyses of the anatomy of their intracranial organs, including the inner ear, which facilitates their remarkable capacity of maintaining visual and postural stability while running and capturing prey at high speeds, a key feature in the hunting specialization of the modern cheetah species. The inner ear, located in the petrosal bone at the base of the occipital region, plays a primary role in detecting head movements (accelerations and decelerations in both linear and rotational directions – pitch, yaw, and roll) and directly guiding the eyes and neck muscles in order to maintain posture and stabilize balance and gaze (e.g., vestibulo-ocular reflex11,12). The bony labyrinth surrounds the soft tissues of the inner ear and can be used as a proxy for investigating the shape and dimensions of this organ. The morphology of the bony labyrinth can be correlated with phylogenetic relationships in some groups13,14,15,16,17,18. The vestibular system within the bony labyrinth, in particular, also can reflect ecological capabilities of vertebrates, especially their locomotor styles19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26. In this paper, we investigate the shape and the dimensions of the bony vestibular system in a number of individual extant cheetahs (taking into account variation that might be present in members of several subspecies) compared to other extant felids, using high-resolution μ-CT data and 3D morphometric analyses. Because of the long evolutionary history of the cheetah lineage27, and to provide greater insights into the timing of its specialized predatory behavior, we studied the fossil ‘giant’ cheetah Acinonyx pardinensis (early-middle Pleistocene) and one of the earliest felids Proailurus lemanensis (Oligo-Miocene of Eurasia28), to assess the ancestral inner ear condition for the cheetah and felid clades (Supplementary Fig. 1; Supplementary Tables 12; see Methods).

We predict that the extant cheetah species will display a greater volume of its vestibular system, when compared to other felids, given the primary role of the vestibular system in sensing head motions and enabling co-ordination of body movement and gaze direction, essential features for high-speed running (e.g., enlarged utricular volume increasing semicircular canal system afferent sensitivity29). We investigated the variation of the bony vestibular system shape among felids using 3D geometric morphometrics, a powerful method for determining phylogenetic and functional patterns of mammalian inner ears14,18,26,30,31,32,33. Among the shape factors previously identified as related to the sensitivity of the vestibular system afferents are the size of the semicircular canals, and the variations of orthogonality between canals and their degree of out-of-plane curvatures21,26,34,35,36,37,38. We would expect that fossil and extant cheetahs will share similarities in shape and dimensions due to their close shared ancestry and potentially similar locomotor and predatory ecologies indicated by prior skeletal studies39,40,41,42. In contrast, we would expect different vestibular system shapes and dimensions between extinct and modern cheetahs, if they adopted different hunting strategies or degrees of high-speed locomotor performance. These differences would indicate a lag in modification of the inner ear relative to the locomotor system in the evolution of high-speed hunting in this lineage.


Volume of the vestibular system

The volume of the vestibular system relative to the volume of the entire bony labyrinth in felids varies between 26.5 and 39.9% (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Table 3; see Methods). The mean volume of 32.4% for all extant felids is very close to that of the earliest fossil felid Proailurus, thus representing a primitive condition for the clade. The Panthera lineage, the earliest-diverging lineage of extant felids (represented in our sample by the tiger, leopard, and clouded leopard), is closely clustered with the extinct Proailurus, and the extant puma and marbled cat. The domestic cat (Felis catus) and its putative ancestor, the wild cat (Felis silvestris), differ markedly, with the domestic cat having the larger vestibular system of the two species. The smallest volume percentages occur in the margay, golden cat, and fishing cat (26.5, 27.7, and 28.7%, respectively), whereas, for taxa with higher than average volumes, vestibular systems are progressively larger in the fossil cheetah, bobcat, jaguarondi, and at the far extreme, the extant cheetah. The average volume of the vestibular system in A. jubatus represents a remarkable 39.9% of the bony labyrinth volume, or 1.5 times greater than the percentage volume for the margay. This percentage ratio varies between 38 and 43.7% for the 7 extant cheetah specimens studied, each individual of which has a relatively larger vestibular system than any other felid in our sample (Supplementary Table 3). Within the puma lineage, the vestibular system ratio of Puma concolor is nearly 4% lower compared to its closest relative Herpailurus yagouaroundi, and the ratio for this system is between 2 and 8% lower in the fossil cheetah compared to modern cheetah individuals. The fossil cheetah vestibular volume also is smaller than in the jaguarondi, but larger than in the puma (Supplementary Table 3). Relative to estimated body masses of each specimen analysed, using another proxy for body mass (basicranial length), the volume of the vestibular system of Proailurus is much smaller than predicted from the overall felid regression model (Fig. 1b, Supplementary Table 4; see Methods). From this ancestral condition, extant felids evolved larger vestibular systems relative to their body masses. Within the puma clade, the extant cheetah shows the greatest increase of the vestibular system volume relative to its body mass, and it is far larger than in its closest relative, the fossil ‘giant’ cheetah Acinonyx pardinensis.

Figure 1

Vestibular System (VS) proportions and shape of seven extant cheetah specimens compared to 14 other extant and extinct felids. (a) Representation in phenogram of the Volume of the Vestibular System (Vol VS, illustrated in dark grey) relative to the entire Bony Labyrinth Volume (Vol BL) using phylogeny of felids (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Table 1). (b) Residuals of the regression model between Vol VS and estimated body mass of felid species, represented as a color gradient along phylogeny. (c) Principal Components Analysis (PCA) of 3D shape. Note that VS of extant cheetahs has a highly distinct shape on PC1 (associated, among others, with longer anterior and posterior semicircular canals), its relative volume is much larger compared to any other felids, and also larger than expected from its estimated body mass, especially when compared to other puma-lineage felids and its nearest relative, the fossil cheetah Acinonyx pardinensis. Also note the primitive shape and proportions of VS in the fossil cheetah A. pardinensis, resembling that of the early fossil felid Proailurus lemanensis.

3D shape of the vestibular system

We performed a Principal Components Analysis (PCA) based on Procrustes coordinates generated from a three-dimensional landmark dataset placed on the vestibular systems of our felid sample (Supplementary Table 5; see Methods). The first two axes of the PCA explain nearly 75% of the shape variation of the vestibular system (Fig. 1c; PC1: 52.6%, PC2: 18.4%). PC1 separates the shape of the vestibular system of extant cheetahs and, to a lesser extent, that of the clouded leopard, puma, and jaguarondi, with negative values, from the rest of the studied felids (including the two fossils) that have positive values. The margay exhibits the most distinct shape on PC1 relative to extant cheetahs. Negative PC1 values are associated with: longer and straighter common crus, and therefore anterior and posterior semicircular canals (SC) more extended dorsally (Supplementary Fig. 2a,c,d); increase of the angle between the anterior and posterior SC (Supplementary Fig. 2b); anterior portion of the anterior SC twisted laterally (Supplementary Fig. 2b); lateral portion of the posterior SC twisted posteriorly (Supplementary Fig. 2b); straighter and narrower lateral SC (Supplementary Fig. 2a,b,d); more medial position of the bifurcation between the lateral and posterior SC (Supplementary Fig. 2b); and greater ventral extension of the posterior SC (Supplementary Fig. 2c). Positive PC1 values are associated with: shorter common crus; anterior and posterior SC widths larger than heights; decreased angle between the anterior and posterior SC, with less twisted anterior and posterior SC; wider lateral SC, concave in lateral view; more lateral bifurcation between the lateral and posterior SC; and less ventral extension of the posterior SC (Supplementary Fig. 2a–d).

PC2 further distinguishes the shape of the vestibular system of the golden cat and, to a lesser extent, of the puma, jaguarondi, and clouded leopard, with positive values, from those of most other felids, particularly the fishing cat, with negative values (Fig. 1c). Also, the shape of the vestibular system in the subspecies of extant cheetahs are mostly distinguished on PC2, with the Tanzanian and South African forms exhibiting more negative scores compared to the Northeast cheetah. Negative PC2 values are associated with: longer and slightly curved common crus; anterior SC slightly more extended dorsally; narrower anterior and posterior SC; straighter lateral SC; and posterior SC less extended ventrally (Supplementary Fig. 3). Positive PC2 values are associated with: shorter and straighter common crus; slightly less dorsally extended anterior SC; wider anterior and posterior SC; more curved lateral SC; posterior SC extending more ventrally (Supplementary Fig. 3).

The fossil cheetah displays a distinct shape from the extant cheetahs on PC1 (Fig. 1c). Relative to the Procrustes coordinates of the Pleistocene fossil cheetah, the mean Procrustes coordinates for modern cheetahs indicate differences in the length of the common crus (longer), shape of the semicircular canals (anterior SC less extended anteriorly, posterior SC less extended posteriorly, both anterior and posterior SC more extended dorsally, narrower lateral SC), out-of-plane curvature of the lateral SC (straighter), angle between the anterior and posterior SC (greater), and position of the bifurcation between the lateral and posterior SC (more medial, resulting in a greater separation between the posterior branch of the lateral SC and the ventral branch of the posterior SC) (Fig. 2).

Figure 2

Shape differences of the Vestibular System (VS, highlighted in blue) between the fossil and extant cheetah species. VS in lateral, anterolateral, and dorsal views from top to bottom. Black points = extinct Acinonyx pardinensis Procrustes coordinates; grey points = extant Acinonyx jubatus mean Procrustes coordinates. Numbers correspond to main regions of shape differences: 1, length of the common crus; 2, out-of-plane curvature of the lateral semicircular canal (SC); 3, shape of the anterior SC; 4, shape of the posterior SC; 5, angle between the anterior and posterior SC; 6, width of the lateral SC; 7, position of the bifurcation between the lateral and posterior SC.

To test the allometric effect of body size on vestibular system shape variation, we performed a Procrustes ANOVA between log-transformed centroid size and Procrustes coordinates of the vestibular system of felid species (see Methods). Associated permutation tests indicate no statistically significant covariation between body size and vestibular shape data (p-value = 0.098). Moreover, we tested the influence of phylogeny or evolutionary relatedness of felid species on our sample of vestibular system shapes using the Kmult statistic (see Methods) and we found a significant, but rather weak, phylogenetic signal in our shape data (p-value = 0.02, Kmult = 0.496).


The documentation of a much greater volume of the vestibular system relative to the overall bony labyrinth volume in the extant cheetah among all 15 species sampled across the felid clade, as well as one of the largest vestibular systems relative to estimated body mass in felids, including the largest vestibular system within the puma clade and much larger than its nearest relative the Pleistocene fossil cheetah, constitute previously unknown findings related to the extraordinarily fast motion during prey pursuit in the modern cheetah. This suggests an enhanced role of the two vestibular sensory components, otolith organs and semicircular canals, during the evolutionary history of cheetahs (e.g., enlarged utricular volume increasing the semicircular canal system afferent sensitivity29). The otolith organs (saccule and utricule) ensure the detection of linear accelerations and decelerations of the body, as well as gravity changes, essential in cheetahs to maintain balance while accelerating in forward and lateral directions during high-speed pursuit and rapid decelerations associated with prey capture (as associated with hunting dynamics in wild cheetahs2). Both the otolith organs and the semicircular canals, which sense rotational head movements (pitch, roll, yaw), play a critical role for maintaining gaze direction and head posture while the animal is maneuvering and changing directions during high-speed runs.

Our 3D shape analysis of the vestibular system revealed that phylogenetic relationships among felids significantly influence its shape variation, whereas a key ecological attribute, body size, does not. However, the low Kmult value for the significant phylogenetic correlation suggests that other factors (i.e., physiological and functional) also control the vestibular system shape in felids. The results document that the seven members of the extant cheetah subspecies all display more elongated anterior and posterior semicircular canals (ASC, PSC) than any other felid, due to the presence of a longer common crus, while the lateral semicircular canal (LSC) is narrower and less elongated. Longer canals are associated with greater afferent sensitivity to rotational head movements in mammals21,29,36,43. Previous studies suggested that both the ASC and PSC influence vestibulo-ocular and vestibulo-collic reflexes, which are responsible for adjustments of eye direction and head position during locomotion, while LSC dimensions primarly correlate with navigation control, particularly important for species that locomote in complex 3D environments, such as arboreal, aquatic, and aerial specialists21,37,44. Thus, the observed configuration of the SC in all specimens of the extant cheetah analysed indicate greater afferent sensitivity of the vestibular system to pitch and roll head movements, ensuring the activation of the visual and postural reflex adjustments during the low amplitude vertical head motion associated with high-speed hunts. These specialized hunters exhibit a greater angle between the ASC and PSC, deviating from an orthogonal position, and out-of-plane curvatures of the vertical SC, compared to the vestibular systems of other felids. The deviation from orthogonality of the SC has been associated with slower overall head rotations in mammals, with terrestrial running species having canals that are closer to right angles (90var38; e.g., semicircular canal modifications of semi-aquatic otters and minks26). This finding contradicts the pattern observed between cheetahs and other felids (i.e., greater angle between ASC and PSC in cheetahs, Supplementary Table 6), but it is possible that the greater vertical development of ASC and PSC in cheetahs has a more important influence than their orthogonality on increasing the afferent vestibular sensitivity to roll and pitch head movements (as radius of curvature R, a measure of canal elongation, is still the most common index used to infer an animal’s agility21,37). Moreover, the out-of-plane curvature of ASC and PSC could allow the cheetah to sense accelerations of the head in other directions than the main roll and pitch movements19,33. Further physiological studies on the possible effect of semicircular canal curvature on the canal afferent sensitivity would enhance interpretations of their interrelationships.

Postcranial remains of Acinonyx pardinensis suggest that fossil cheetahs already were adapted for fast running since at least the beginning of the Pleistocene39,40,41,42. Nevertheless, the small vestibular system of the fossil cheetah species, and, in particular, the presence of a shorter common crus and less extended ASC and PSC compared to the extant cheetah, indicate a relatively lower afferent sensitivity to angular and linear head movements. In addition to those physiological and functional aspects, the shape patterns of the vestibular system of A. pardinensis closely resemble that of the early fossil felid Proailurus, reflecting the retention of a morphologically primitive, ancestral condition, and emphasizing that postcranial skeleton modifications for higher speed locomotion preceded adaptations in the inner ear sensory system within the cheetah lineage. The extreme enlargement of the vestibular system and elongation of the ASC and PSC exhibited by modern cheetahs thus appears to be a unique and extremely recent key acquisition to fast running within that lineage. It is possibly more recent than the middle Pleistocene (i.e., 126,000 year old last occurrence of Acinonyx pardinensis in the fossil record) and could even coincide with the late Pleistocene population bottleneck for A. jubatus, as estimated from gene sequences of modern African cheetahs10.



We scanned 19 specimens of extant felids, including 13 species across each major lineage27 (Supplementary Fig. 1, Supplementary Table 1). The extant cheetah Acinonyx jubatus is represented by 7 specimens, including 3 subspecies of the 5 recognized3 (Supplementary Table 2). Our extant felid sample encompasses terrestrial and scansorial taxa, one cursorial hunter (cheetah, Acinonyx jubatus), one piscivorous cat (fishing cat, Prionailurus viverrinus) and three arboreal specialists (margay, Leopardus wiedii; marbled cat, Pardofelis marmorata; clouded leopard, Neofelis nebulosa). Most specimens are from the Mammalogy collections and Vertebrate Paleontology teaching collections of the American Museum of Natural History, New York (AMNH) and were digitized at the AMNH Microscopy and Imaging Facility (MIF) using a high-resolution GE Phoenix Vtome x s240 micro-CT scanner. Two fossil taxa were included in this study, the earliest known felid Proailurus lemanensis and the ‘giant’ Pleistocene cheetah Acinonyx pardinensis, in order to assess morphological changes of the inner ear through felid evolutionary history and particularly the timing of the onset of the peculiar hunting behavior of modern cheetahs. We scanned the holotype specimen of the type species Proailurus lemanensis, recovered from the early Miocene locality of Saint-Gérand-le-Puy in central France45 (MN2a of the European Neogene mammalian biochron zonation). The P. lemanensis material is stored in the paleontological collections of the Muséum d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris, France), and digital data were acquired at the AST-RX platform of the Museum with a GE Phoenix Vtome x L240 micro-CT scanner. The specimen of A. pardinensis, from the paleontological collections of the Musée des Confluences (Lyon, France), is one of the best preserved skulls ever recovered for that species46,47. It comes from earliest Pleistocene deposits of Saint Vallier, France (geochronologically dated to ca. 2.4 Ma48). That skull was digitized at the Biomaterials Science Centre of the University of Basel, Switzerland with a GE Phoenix Nanotom. Details on all sampled specimens (including collection location, ontogenic stage, geographical origin, and sex) and on CT and 3D reconstruction data (voxel size, voltage and amperage of the electron beam, side of the reconstructed bony labyrinth) are summarized in Supplementary Table 2.

MIMICS16.0 (Materialise NV, Belgium) was used for 3D reconstructions of bony labyrinths and calculations of vestibular system and bony labyrinth volumes, as well as for linear and angular measurements of the vestibular system, which can be used for further comparative studies (Supplementary Tables 3 and 6). The bony channels for the vestibular and cochlear aqueducts were removed for volume measurements, as the membranous structures associated are only partly surrounded by bone and therefore cannot be entirely reconstructed17.

Vestibular and bony labyrinth volume analysis

The ratio of vestibular system volume relative to the volume of the entire bony labyrinth was calculated, and those values were plotted against the phylogenetic tree using the packages APE49 and Phytools50 in R 3.1.1 (Fig. 1a). The phylogeny is a subset from a felid tree51, which was based on molecular data27 with inclusion of fossils using stratigraphic occurrences (Supplementary Fig. 1, see Supplementary Table 1 for details on divergence dates). To take into account the possible allometric relationship between body mass and bony labyrinth volume, the log-transformed volume of the vestibular system (in mm3) alone was regressed against the log-transformed estimated body mass (in g [grams]) of the felid species using a simple least squares regression model in R (Supplementary Table 4). Estimated body mass was calculated according to an equation based on the condylobasal length of the skull for each specimen52. Volumetric and body mass data are reported in Supplementary Table 3. Residuals of the regression model are presented in Supplementary Table 4 and plotted against the phylogenetic tree in Fig. 1b using the same R packages as for the ratios of the vestibular system (APE and Phytools).

3D shape analysis

3D geometric morphometric analyses of the vestibular system were performed following the protocol of a previous study26: 3 fixed landmarks were placed at the bifurcation points of the semicircular canals and 80 semilandmarks were generated from curves placed at the center of the canals and common crus (20 per canal and 20 for the common crus) using ISE-Meshtools 1.353 (; see Supplementary Table 5 for detailed location of landmarks and semilandmarks). Procrustes superimposition with sliding process minimizing Bending Energy was performed to obtain 3D Procrustes coordinates of the vestibular system, using the R package Geomorph54. The configuration of Procrustes coordinates obtained using that sliding process was compared to a generalized Procrustes analysis minimizing Procrustes distance (see statistical tests between the two approaches26,55,56). The Bending Energy approach led to a more uniform distribution of coordinates along curves, and therefore was chosen for subsequent analyses. To analyse shape variation of the vestibular system, Principal Components Analysis (PCA) of the Procrustes coordinates of individual felid specimens was performed (Fig. 1c). To test for allometry in the shape data, a Procrustes ANOVA between the Procrustes coordinates (mean Procrustes coordinates for the 7 specimens of Acinonyx jubatus) and the log-transformed centroid size was undertaken. The phylogenetic signal in the shape data also was calculated, using the Kmult statistic, in which the K value (between 0 and 1) reflects lesser or greater correspondence between the observed shapes and those expected from the phylogeny under a Brownian model of evolution57,58. The K value was evaluated statistically via permutation tests, with data at the tips of the phylogeny randomized relative to the reference tree.

Data availability statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article (and its Supplementary Information files).


  1. 1.

    Sharp, N. C. C. Time running speed of a cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus). J. Zool. 241, 493–494 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wilson, A. M. et al. Locomotion dynamics of hunting in wild cheetahs. Nature 498, 185–189 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Krausman, P. R. & Morales, S. M. Acinonyx jubatus. Mamm. Species 771, 1–6 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hayward, N. W., Hofmeyr, M., O’Brien, J. & Kerley, G. H. I. Prey preferences of the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) (Felidae: Carnivora): morphological limitations or the need to capture rapidly consumable prey before kleptoparasites arrive? J. Zool. 270, 615–627 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kitchener, A. C., Van Valkenburgh, B. & Yamaguchi, N. Felid form and function. In: Biology and Conservation of Wild Felids (eds Macdonald, D. W. & Loveridge, A. J.) 83–106 (Oxford University Press, New York, 2010).

  6. 6.

    Hildebrand, M. Further studies on locomotion of the cheetah. J. Mammal. 42, 84–91 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Kitchener, A. The Natural History of the Wild Cats (Christopher Helm, A. & Black, C., London, UK, 1991).

  8. 8.

    Hudson, P. E. et al. Functional anatomy of the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) hindlimb. J. Anat. 218, 363–374 (2011a).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hudson, P. E. et al. Functional anatomy of the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) forelimb. J. Anat. 218, 375–385 (2011b).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dobrynin, P. et al. Genomic legacy of the African cheetah, Acinonyx jubatus. Genome Biol. 16, 277 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Cox, P. G. & Jeffery, N. Morphology of the mammalian vestibulo-ocular reflex: the spatial arrangement of the human fetal semicircular canals and extraocular muscles. J. Morphol. 268, 878–890 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Cox, P. G. & Jeffery, N. Geometry of the semicircular canals and extraocular muscles in rodents, lagomorphs, felids and modern humans. J. Anat. 213, 583–596 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Schmelzle, T., Sánchez-Villagra, M. R. & Maier, W. Vestibular labyrinth diversity in diprotodontian marsupial mammals. Mammal. Study 32, 83–97 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lebrun, R., de Léon, M. P., Tafforeau, P. & Zollikofer, C. Deep evolutionary roots of strepsirrhine primate labyrinthine morphology. J. Anat. 216, 368–380 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Luo, Z., Ruf, I., Schultz, J. A. & Martin, T. Fossil evidence on evolution of inner ear cochlea in Jurassic mammals. Proc. R. Soc. B. 278, 28–34 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Boistel, R. et al. Shake rattle and roll: the bony labyrinth and aerial descent in squamates. Integr. Comp. Biol. 51, 957–968 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ekdale, E. G. Comparative anatomy of the bony labyrinth (inner ear) of placental mammals. PLoS ONE 8, e66624 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mennecart, B. et al. Bony labyrinth morphology clarifies the origin and evolution of deer. Sci. Rep. 7, 13176 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Spoor, F., Wood, B. & Zonneveld, F. Implications of early hominid labyrinthine morphology for evolution of human bipedal locomotion. Nature 369, 645–648 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Spoor, F., Bajpai, S., Hussain, S. T., Kumar, K. & Thewissen, J. G. M. Vestibular evidence for the evolution of aquatic behaviour in early cetaceans. Nature 417, 163–166 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Spoor, F. et al. The primate semicircular canal system and locomotion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 10808–10812 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lindenlaub, T., Burda, H. & Nevo, E. Convergent evolution of the vestibular organ in the subterranean mole-rats Cryptomys and Spalax, as compared with the aboveground rat, Rattus. J. Morphol. 224, 303–311 (1995).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Alonso, P. D., Milner, A. C., Ketcham, R. A., Cookson, M. J. & Rowe, T. B. The avian nature of the brain and inner ear of Archaeopteryx. Nature 430, 666–669 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ladevèze, S., de Muizon, C., Colbert, M. & Smith, T. 3D computational imaging of the petrosal of a new multituberculate mammal from the Late Cretaceous of China and its paleobiologic inferences. C. R. Palevol. 9, 319–330 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ni, X., Flynn, J. J. & Wyss, A. R. The bony labyrinth of the early platyrrhine primate Chilecebus. J. Hum. Evol. 59, 595–607 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Grohé, C., Tseng, Z. J., Lebrun, R., Boistel, R. & Flynn, J. J. Bony labyrinth shape variation in extant Carnivora: a case study of Musteloidea. J. Anat. 228, 366–383 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Johnson, W. E. et al. The Late Miocene radiation of modern Felidae: a genetic assessment. Science 311, 73–77 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Peigné, S. Proailurus, l’un des plus anciens Felidae (Carnivora) d’Eurasie: systématique et évolution. Bull. Soc. Hist. Nat. Toulouse 135, 125–134 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Müller, M. Semicircular duct dimensions and sensitivity of the vertebrate vestibular system. J. Theor. Biol. 167, 239–256 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gunz, P., Ramsier, M., Kuhrig, M., Hublin, J.-J. & Spoor, F. The mammalian bony labyrinth reconsidered, introducing a comprehensive geometric morphometric approach. J. Anat. 220, 529–543 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Alloing-Séguier, L., Sánchez-Villagra, M. R., Lee, M. S. Y. & Lebrun, R. The bony labyrinth in diprotodontian marsupial mammals: diversity in extant and extinct forms and relationships with size and phylogeny. J. Mammal. Evol. 20, 191–198 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Billet, G., Hautier, L. & Lebrun, R. Morphological diversity of the bony labyrinth (inner ear) in extant xenarthrans and its relation to phylogeny. J. Mammal. 96, 658–672 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Le Maître, A., Schuetz, P., Vignaud, P. & Brunet, M. New data about semicircular canal morphology and locomotion in modern hominoids. J. Anat. 231, 95–109 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Müller, M. Size limitations in semicircular duct systems. J. Theor. Biol. 198, 405–437 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    McVean, A. Are the semicircular canals of the European mole, Talpa europaea, adapted to a subterranean habitat? Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A. Mol. Integr. Physiol. 123, 173–178 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Yang, A. & Hullar, T. E. Relationship of semicircular canal size to vestibulo-nerve afferent sensitivity in mammals. J. Neurophysiol. 98, 3197–3205 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Cox, P. G. & Jeffery, N. Semicircular canals and agility: the influence of size and shape measures. J. Anat. 216, 37–47 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Malinzak, M. D., Kay, R. F. & Hullar, T. E. Locomotor head movements and semicircular canal morphology in primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 17914–17919 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kurtén, B. Pleistocene Mammals of Europe (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London, UK, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Van Valkenburgh, B., Grady, F. & Kurtén, B. The Plio-Pleistocene cheetah-like cat Miracinonyx inexpectatus of North America. J. Vert. Paleontol. 10, 434–454 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Turner, A. & Antón, M. The Big Cats and Their Fossil Relatives: an Illustrated Guide to Their Evolution and Natural History (Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Hemmer, H., Kahlke, R.-D. & Vekua, A. K. The cheetah Acinonyx pardinensis (Croizet et Jobert, 1828) s.l. at the hominin site of Dmanisi (Georgia) – A potential prime meat supplier in Early Pleistocene ecosystems. Quat. Sci. Rev. 30, 2703–2714 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Jones, G. M. & Spells, K. E. A theoretical and comparative study of the functional dependence of the semicircular canal upon its physical dimensions. Proc. R. Soc. London B. 157, 403–419 (1963).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Fitzpatrick, R. C., Butler, J. E. & Day, B. L. Resolving head rotation for human bipedalism. Curr. Biol. 16, 1509–1514 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Filhol, H. Étude des mammifères fossiles de Saint-Gérand-le-Puy (Allier). Ann. Sci. Géol. Paris 1–253 (1879).

  46. 46.

    Viret, J. Le loess à bancs durcis de Saint-Vallier (Drôme) et sa faune de mammifères villafranchiens. Nouvelles Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Lyon 4, 1–200 (1954).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Geraads, D. How old is the cheetah skull shape? The case of Acinonyx pardinensis (Mammalia, Felidae). Geobios 47, 39–44 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Nomade, S. et al. 40Ar/39Ar constraints on some French landmark Late Pliocene to Early Pleistocene large mammalian paleofaunas: paleoenvironmental and paleoecological implications. Quat. Geochronol. 21, 2–15 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Paradis, E., Claude, J. & Strimmer, K. APE: analyses for phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289–290 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Revell, L. J. phytools: An R package for phylogenetic comparative biology (and other things). Methods Ecol. Evol. 3, 217–223 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Piras, P. et al. Bite of the cats: relationships between functional integration and mechanical performance as revealed by mandible geometry. Syst. Biol. 62, 878–900 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Mazák, J. H., Christiansen, P. & Kitchener, A. Oldest known pantherine skull and evolution of the tiger. PLoS ONE 6, e25483 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Lebrun, R. ISE-MeshTools, a 3D interactive fossil reconstruction freeware. 12th Annual Meeting of EAVP, Torino, Italy; 06/2014 (2014).

  54. 54.

    Adams, D. C. & Otárola-Castillo, E. Geomorph: an R package for the collection and analysis of geometric morphometric shape data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 4, 393–399 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Perez, S. I., Bernal, V. & Gonzalez, P. N. Differences between sliding semi-landmark methods in geometric morphometrics, with an application to human craniofacial and dental variation. J. Anat. 208, 769–784 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Tseng, Z. J. & Flynn, J. J. Are cranial biomechanical simulation data linked to known diets in extant taxa? A method for applying diet-biomechanics linkage models to infer feeding capability of extinct species. PLoS ONE 10, e0124020 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Adams, D. C. A generalized K statistic for estimating phylogenetic signal from shape and other high-dimensional multivariate data. Syst. Biol. 63, 685–697 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Blomberg, S. P., Garland, T. & Ives, A. R. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717–745 (2003).

Download references


We appreciate the substantial assistance provided by Neil Duncan and Eileen Westwig (Mammalogy, AMNH) and Ruth O’Leary and Alana Gishlick (Paleontology, AMNH) in facilitating access to and loans of extant felid specimens. We thank Henry Towbin and Morgan Hill from the MIF lab (AMNH) for assistance with the CT data acquisition. We thank Nicole Wong (Paleontology, AMNH) for her illustrations of fossil felids. We are grateful to Didier Berthet from the Musée des Confluences, Lyon (France) for kindly providing access to the skull of A. pardinensis, Georg Schultz and Bert Müller (Biomedical Science Center, University of Basel, Switzerland) and Loïc Costeur and Bastien Mennecart (Natural History Museum of Basel) for collecting and providing CT data for that specimen. We thank Guillaume Billet (MNHN) for allowing access to the Proailurus skull, and Miguel Garcia Sanz (MNHN) for acquiring the CT data. The CT-scan of Proailurus lemanensis was performed at the “AST-RX, plateforme d’accès scientifique à la tomographie à rayons X du MNHN, UMS 2700 outils et méthodes de la systématique intégrative CNRS-MNHN, Paris” with support from NSF grant DEB-1257572 (to C.G. and J.J.F.). This work also was funded by an AMNH Frick Postdoctoral Fellowship (to C.G.). We finally are grateful to Eric Ekdale, an anonymous reviewer, and editorial board member Jin Meng for helpful comments which improved the quality of this manuscript.

Author information




C.G. and J.J.F. designed research; C.G. and B.L. performed research; C.G. and B.L. collected and analysed data; C.G. and J.J.F. interpreted data; and C.G. and J.J.F. wrote the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camille Grohé.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grohé, C., Lee, B. & Flynn, J.J. Recent inner ear specialization for high-speed hunting in cheetahs. Sci Rep 8, 2301 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links