Galectin-1 (Gal-1) is required for the development of B cells in the bone marrow (BM), however very little is known about the contribution of Gal-1 to the development of B cell regulatory function. Here, we report an important role for Gal-1 in the induction of B cells regulatory function. Mice deficient of Gal-1 (Gal-1−/−) showed significant loss of Transitional-2 (T2) B cells, previously reported to include IL-10+ regulatory B cells. Gal-1−/− B cells stimulated in vitro via CD40 molecules have impaired IL-10 and Tim-1 expression, the latter reported to be required for IL-10 production in regulatory B cells, and increased TNF-α expression compared to wild type (WT) B cells. Unlike their WT counterparts, T2 and T1 Gal-1−/− B cells did not suppress TNF-α expression by CD4+ T cells activated in vitro with allogenic DCs (allo-DCs), nor were they suppressive in vivo, being unable to delay MHC-class I mismatched skin allograft rejection following adoptive transfer. Moreover, T cells stimulated with allo-DCs show an increase in their survival when co-cultured with Gal-1−/− T2 and MZ B cells compared to WT T2 and MZ B cells. Collectively, these data suggest that Gal-1 contributes to the induction of B cells regulatory function.
B cells are generally thought to contribute to graft rejection through the production of alloantibody and due to their capacity to efficiently present alloantigens1. However, clinical trials in which B cell depletion was used as part of the therapy, have suggested that B cells can contribute to the regulation of the recipient immune responses leading to allografts tolerance2,3,4. Several groups have reported that certain subsets of B cells reduce inflammatory responses in mice, and that autoimmune diseases and transplant rejection can be exacerbated in their absence5,6,7,8,9,10,11. Various B cell subsets with regulatory functions have been identified such as T2 B cells12, CD5+ CD1d+ B cells13,14, Tim-1+ B cells11, or MZ B cells15,16. IL-10 production has been recognized as one of the key mediators of the regulatory functions of these B cell subsets. We recently reported that B cells were capable of prolonging allogenic skin graft survival10. Adoptive transfer of T2 and T1 B cells, but not follicular (FO) B cells, from naïve mice housed in conventional animal facilities prolonged the skin allograft survival10. B cell capacity to delay skin graft rejection was lost when B cells were derived from IL-10−/− mice10. Furthermore, the transfer of T2 B cells from mice rendered tolerant to MHC-class I mismatched skin grafts by donor splenocyte transfusion and anti-CD40L treatment, but not naïve nor alloantigen experienced T2 B cells, can prolong skin graft survival and suppress T cell activation17. Ding et al. identified T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 1 (Tim-1) to be the phenotypic marker for most IL-10+ B cells and stimulating this population by anti-Tim-1 antibodies prolongs both cardiac and islet allograft survival11. Although the role of B cells in regulating immune responses in many inflammatory conditions is now broadly accepted, the exact mechanism by which they work, and which molecules are essential for their function, is still being elucidated.
Gal-1, a small lectin, is part of a family of over 15 members sharing high affinity for β-galactosides18,19. Treatment with dimeric Gal-1 has been shown to increase IL-10 mRNA and protein levels in activated and non-activated CD4+ and CD8+ T cells20. Furthermore, activation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with anti-CD3 and Gal-1 induces significantly higher levels of IL-10 than stimulation with anti-CD3 alone21. In addition, direct binding of Gal-1 to CD45 on activated Th cells promotes IL-10 production22. It has also been documented that blocking Gal-1 binding significantly reduced the inhibitory functions of human and mouse regulatory T cells (Tregs)23. Moreover, several studies have documented the major role that Gal-1 plays in inducing T cells apoptosis24,25,26,27. For example, Toscano et al. showed that exposing activated T helper (Th) cells to Gal-1 in vitro could selectively induce the apoptosis of pro-inflammatory Th cells including Th1 and Th17, but not Th2 cells27. Zuniga et al. have reported that exogenous Gal-1 produced by BCR activated B cells can induce T cell apoptosis28. Although the role of Gal-1 in the control of the immune responses mediated by T cells is well characterized, less is known about its function in B cells. Gal-1 is expressed by plasma cells and by Blimp1-GFPlow plasma cells that are not fully differentiated29. However, whether Gal-1 affects the differentiation of B cells into regulatory cells or their function is not known.
In this study, Gal-1−/− mice were used to investigate the contribution of Gal-1 in the generation and function of regulatory B cells.
The lack of Gal-1 expression in B cells reduces IL-10 and Tim-1 expression upon anti-CD40 stimulation while TNF-α expression is increased
We have recently published that B cells from mice housed in the conventional animal facilities have regulatory function in vitro and in vivo10. To understand whether Gal-1 plays a role in the regulatory function of B cells, IL-10 and Tim-1 expression in B cells isolated from WT (C57BL/6 (B6)) mice and Gal-1−/− mice housed under the aforementioned condition were analysed. It has been previously shown that CD40 stimulation is required for IL-10 production and Tim-1 expression by B cells30,31,32, both molecules have been identified as markers for regulatory B cells11,33. Splenic B cells were isolated from WT and Gal-1−/− mice, stimulated in vitro with anti-CD40 antibody, and IL-10 expression and production as well as Tim-1 expression were assessed by flow cytometry. T and B cell purity is shown in Supplemental Fig. 1a. Gal-1−/− B cells showed a reduction in IL-10 expression and production as well as Tim-1 expression compared to WT B cells (Fig. 1a–d). To further support the association between Tim-1 and IL-10, we assessed IL-10 expression by Tim-1+ B cells from either Gal-1−/−or WT mice and, as shown in Fig. 1e, IL-10 expression by Gal-1−/− Tim-1+ B cells was also significantly reduced compared to WT Tim-1+ B cells.
TNF-α has been documented to promote the production of other pro-inflammatory cytokines by the immune cells, to promote tissue damage34,35,36,37, and has been reported to inhibit IL-10 induction38. We examined TNF-α expression in B cells purified from Gal-1−/−and WT mice and found that Gal-1−/− B cells expressed significantly higher levels of TNF-α compared to WT B cells (Fig. 1a and f). Taken together these results suggest that Gal-1 deficiency in B cells shifts the balance between regulatory and pro-inflammatory cytokines towards an inflammatory response.
Gal-1 expression by B cells is necessary for their acquisition of regulatory function to prolong allograft survival
Having shown the importance of Gal-1 for IL-10 and TNF-α expression by B cells in vitro, we next evaluated the effect of Gal-1 on B cells in vivo. We have previously shown that the transfer of B cells obtained from conventionally housed WT mice can prolong MHC-class I mismatched skin allograft survival10. Thus, we tested whether Gal-1−/− B cells could prolong allograft survival in the same skin graft model. Briefly, splenic B cells (1 × 107 cells) isolated from conventionally housed naïve Gal-1−/− and WT mice were adoptively transferred intravenously (i.v.) separately into naïve B6 mice one day before these recipient mice received skin grafts from transgenic B6 mice expressing H-2Kd (C57BL/6 mice express H-2Kb)39. To avoid direct allorecognition by CD8+ T cells we used an anti-CD8 antibody, as previously described39. While B cells from WT mice prolonged skin graft survival, as we have previously published10, the transfer of B cells obtained from Gal-1−/−mice was unable to prolong skin transplant survival (Fig. 2a).
To further investigate the difference in the regulatory function between B cells isolated from WT and Gal-1−/− mice, B cells were tested in vitro for their ability to inhibit CD4+ T cell allo-immune responses, as measured by TNF-α expression. B cells isolated from the spleens of Gal-1−/− or WT mice were co-cultured with CD4+ T cells isolated from WT mice in the presence of irradiated allo-DCs for 48 hours. Only B cells isolated from WT but not Gal-1−/− mice could suppress TNF-α expression by CD4+ T cells (Fig. 2b). Moreover, unlike WT B cells, Gal-1−/− B cells were not able to induce IL-10 expression by CD4+ T cells (Fig. 2c). In addition, under the same culture conditions, we confirmed that B cells isolated from Gal-1−/− mice expressed lower levels of IL-10 and higher levels of TNF-α compared to WT B cells (Fig. 2d and e). These results suggest that Gal-1 expression by B cells is required for the generation of IL-10 expressing regulatory B cells that can suppress allo-immune responses both in vivo and in vitro.
The defect in the regulatory function of B cells from Gal-1−/− mice is due to the defective function of T2 and T1 B cells
Having shown that in the absence of Gal-1 B cells lost their regulatory capacity, next we analysed the composition of the B cells subsets in Gal-1−/− compared to WT mice. Firstly, we observed a lower percentage of B cells in the spleens of Gal-1−/− mice compared to WT mice (Fig. 3a), while no differences were observed in the percentages of B cells found in the Peyer patches (PPs) and Lymph node (LNs) (Fig. 3b and c). We next analysed the proportions of the different B cell subsets in the spleens, PPs and LNs (mandibular and axillary). The gating strategies for identifying the different B cell subsets are shown in the Supplemental Fig. 2a. Analysis of the different subsets of B cells revealed that the proportion of T2 and MZ B cells, both of which have been shown to be regulatory in other models, were decreased as percentages of total Gal-1−/− B cells compared to WT B cells, whereas effector (FO) B cells were slightly increased in the spleens of Gal-1−/− mice (Fig. 3d). Thus, the loss of total B cell suppression may be down to the loss of these subsets. LNs and PPs do not express T2 or MZ B cells; therefore, there were no differences in the percentages of B cell subsets between WT and Gal-1−/− B cells isolated from them (data not shown).
To understand whether the differences in the function of B cells obtained from WT and Gal-1−/− mice was simply due to the numerical impairment in the proportions of B cells in the spleens of Gal-1−/− mice, particularly IL-10 producing regulatory B cells, B cell subsets were purified and tested both in vitro and in vivo. Splenic B cells were magnetically isolated from WT and Gal-1−/− mice. Subsequently, B cell subsets were FACS sorted and added to co-culture of CD4+ T cells (isolated from naïve B6 mice) and allo-DCs for 48 hours. PMA, Ionomycin and brefeldin A were added for the last 4 hours of culture to analyse T cell survival, as well as TNF-α and IL-10 expression in B cell subsets. We found that T cell survival was enhanced when they were co-cultured with Gal-1−/− T2 or MZ B cells compared to their counterpart WT B6 B cells. However, Gal-1−/− T2 and T1 B cells, but not MZ B cells, co-cultured with CD4+ T cells stimulated with allo-DCs expressed higher levels of TNF-α and lower levels of IL-10 compared to WT T2 and T1 B cells (Fig. 3e,f and g).
We further analysed the suppressive function of the B cell subsets isolated from Gal-1−/− mice by testing their suppressive ability in vitro (Fig. 4a). Gal-1−/− T2 and T1 B cells were unable to suppress TNF-α expression by CD4+ T cells compared to WT counterparts (Fig. 4a). In agreement with our previous publication10, MZ B cells failed to suppress even when isolated from WT mice, however, in accordance with their decrease in IL-10 expression (Fig. 3f), the lack of Gal-1 expression appeared to cause the MZ B cells to enhance CD4+ T cell TNF-α expression (Fig. 4a). We confirmed that Gal-1−/− T2 and T1 B cells had lost their regulatory capacity in vivo by testing their ability to inhibit MHC class-I mismatched skin allograft survival following adoptive transfer to B6 recipients. Neither Gal-1−/− T1 nor T2 B cells were able to prolong skin allograft survival, while their WT counterparts were able to do so (Fig. 4b). These results indicate that Gal-1 expression is required for regulatory B cell function, particularly for T2 and T1 regulatory B cells.
Mounting data suggests the existence of B cell populations with regulatory function such as T2 and T1 B cells11,12,13,14,15,16. These cells have been reported to suppress several autoimmune diseases and to prolong allograft survival10,12,17. In this study we show that Gal-1 plays an important role in the induction of regulatory function by B cells both in vitro and in vivo. In an in vivo model of skin transplant, unlike B cells derived from WT mice, the adoptive transfer of B cells from Gal-1−/− mice did not prolong the survival of MHC-class I mismatched skin allograft. Furthermore, Gal-1−/−B cells, unlike WT B cells, did not suppress TNF-α expression by T cells stimulated by allo-DCs in vitro. Furthermore, Gal-1 expression on CD40-activated B cells appears to be required for IL-10 and Tim-1 expression, as Gal-1−/− B cells have reduced expression of IL-10 and Tim-1 as well as IL-10 production. The loss of Gal-1 on B cells was also associated with an increased expression of TNF-α compared to WT B cells suggesting that Gal-1 molecule may play a role in ‘polarisation’ of the B cells cytokine profiles.
Recently a role for Gal-1 has been demonstrated in B cell development as well. The first checkpoint in B cells differentiation requires the clustering of their pre-BCR a process induced by Gal-1 binding40. In our study, using Gal-1−/− mice allowed us to study the influence of Gal-1 on the development of B cells both numerically and functionally. We have observed in this study a lower percentage of B cells, particularly the regulatory T2 B cells in the spleens of Gal-1−/− mice compared to WT mice (Fig. 3a), while no differences were observed in the percentages of B cells found in the PPs and LNs. It has been reported that bone marrow (BM) B cells do not express Gal-1, however, Gal-1 produced by BM stromal cells play an important role in B cell differentiation and proliferation41. Espeli and colleagues showed that co-culturing stromal cells with pro-B/pre-B cells and inhibiting the interaction of pre-BCR with Gal-1 significantly impaired B cell proliferation, and decreased the numbers of pre-B and immature B cells41. These observations might explain the decrease we found in the percentage of B cells in the spleens of Gal-1−/− mice. Nevertheless, the differences seen in the spleen were not the same of what was published by Clark et al. They showed that the number of B220+ cells in the spleen of Gal−/− mice were equivalent to WT animals which might be due to the housing conditions, as the knockout mice were housed in SPF facilities, while the mice used in our study were housed in the CV facilities of the animal house. Importantly and different from us they did not assess the different B cell subsets42.
Our data suggests that Gal-1 expression plays a role in the induction of transitional B cell subsets regulative capacity. In fact, Gal-1−/− T2 and T1 B cells were not able to suppress CD4+ T cells in vitro and to prolong skin allograft survival. Several physiological mechanisms of immune regulation have been known to suppress effector T cells such as IL-10 and induction of apoptosis43,44. Various studies have reported the role of Gal-1 in the induction of IL-1020-22; for example the treatment of activated T cells with dimeric Gal-1 increased IL-10 mRNA levels20. Although most of these studies have used recombinant Gal-1 protein, here we show that Gal-1 deficiency influence the expression of IL-10 and TNF-α by B cells during their development. Our data show that in particular the loss of Gal-1 affected the cytokine profile of Transitional B cell subsets. In our previous publication10, we have shown that T2 and T1 B cell subsets were regulatory only when isolated from mice housed in environment that has no special precautions to prevent entering of infectious agents and that their regulatory function was dependent on IL-10. In this study using the same experimental conditions, we found that IL-10 expression in the Gal-1−/− Transitional B cells was significantly lower compared to the same two subsets derived from WT mice, the same for TNF-α expression although mostly in Gal-1−/− T2 and only slightly in T1 B cells. In contrast, the cytokine expression of the MZ B cells was not affected. Whether the effect observed was due to differences in the amount of Gal-1 expressed or produced by these B cell subsets or by other cells and the localisation of the Gal-1 in the different cell types are unknown and need further investigation.
A previous study reported that exogenous Gal-1 produced by BCR activated B cells can induce T cell apoptosis28. In our co-culture experiments, increased T cell survival occurred in the presence of Gal−/− B cells. Although we did not measure T cell apoptosis directly, nor have we shown that anti-CD40 activated B cells produce Gal-1 it is tempting to suggest that the observation by Zuniga et al. is happening in our cultures28. However, our observations are purely circumstantial and need to be validated. What is also interesting but we do not have a mechanism for this observation is that survival of T cells is influenced by the Gal−/− B cell subsets T2 and MZ but not by T1 B cells. This result again suggests that Gal-1 not only influence the functional development of B cells, but that it does so in a different manner between the different B cell subsets.
Collectively, we have provided some evidence that Gal-1 affects the function of B cells, in particular Transitional Bregs, affecting their cytokine expression and their suppressive capacity. However, whether Gal-1 plays its role extracellularly or intracellularly needs further investigation.
Materials and Methods
These studies were approved and conducted in accredited facilities in accordance with The Home Office UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (Home Office license number PPL 70/7302).
Wild type C57BL/6 (H-2Kb) and BALB/c (H-2d) mice were purchased from Harlan Laboratories. B6Kd mice were a generous gift from Dr. R Pat Bucy (University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA). Gal-1−/− mice (on C57BL/6 background) were kindly provided by F. Poirier. All mice groups were maintained in conventional (CV) facilities for the same period of time (4 weeks). The Home Office (UK) approved all mouse protocols utilized in this study.
Purification of B cells, B cell subsets and CD4+ T cells
Splenic B cells were purified by negative selection using CD43 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotech, 130–049801) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Splenic CD4+ T cells were isolated using Invitrogen Dynabeads® Untouched™MouseCD4 Cells kits, according to manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen, 11416D). Purified splenic B cells were stained with anti-CD21, anti-CD24 and anti-CD23 antibodies. Cells were then incubated for 30 mins at 4 °C, and washed 2 times. Next, cells were re-suspended in 1 ml of FACS buffer. DAPI was added to the cells just before starting the sort to exclude dead cells. Sorting took place on a BD FACSAria (BD Biosciences).
B cell activation system
Magnetically isolated B cells (2 × 105 cells/well) were activated for 48 hours with anti-CD40 antibodies (10 µg/ml) from FGK45 Hyridoma. After collecting the supernatants, PMA, Ionomycin and brefeldin A were added for the last 4 hours of culture. Next, the cells were labelled with surface antibodies and stained for intracellular cytokines, and the supernatants were used to measure IL-10 production by CBA.
DCs were generated from bone marrow as previously described39. One day before DC isolation, 100ng/mL LPS (E.coli, EnzoLife Sciences, UK) was added to induce maturation. At day 7 of culture, DCs were collected, washed three times, and irradiated.
In vitro suppression assays
Isolated CD4+ T cells were co-cultured with irradiated allo-DCs alone at a ratio of 25 T cells: 1 DC, or with B cells and allo-DCs at a ratio of 25 T cells: 25 B cells: 1DC. Cells were cultured for 48 hrs at 37 °C in RPMI in 96 well plates (1.5–2 × 105 cells/well).
Donor tail skin grafts were performed and monitored as previously described39. Anti-CD8 antibody (clone YTS169, 250 μg/injection/mouse) was injected i.p. at day-1 and day 1 after skin graft, and weekly thereafter. B cells (1 × 107cells) and B cell subsets (1 × 106cells) were injected intravenously one day after transplant.
Antibodies and Flow Cytometry
All FACS antibodies were purchased from eBioscience. Surface staining was performed as previously described39. For intracellular staining, cells were stained then fixed/permebilized according to the eBioscience protocol. Permeabilized cells were incubated in PermwashTM with anti-IL10, anti-TNF-α or appropriate isotype control for 30 mins at 4 °C (with blocking anti-CD16/32). For the detection of intracellular cytokines, PMA (50ng/ml), ionomycin (1 μM) and brefeldin A were added for 5 hrs before staining. Cells were acquired using LSRII or Fortessa flow cytometers (BD Biosciences). FlowJo software was used for analysis.
Cytomeric Beads Arrays
The levels of IL-10 production were measured by CBA assay (CBA, BD, Oxford, UK) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, IL-10 capture beads were added to the detection reagent and to 50 μl from the supernatants, which were collected after stimulating B cells isolated from Gal-1−/− and B6 mice with anti-CD40 Abs (non-stimulated B cells were used as controls) for 48 hrs. After 2 hrs of incubation, the beads were washed and resuspended. Beads were acquired using Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). FCAP Array software was used for analysis.
Comparisons between groups were performed using Mann-Whitney test for two groups. Log Rank (Mantel-Cox) tests were used for graft survival curves. Analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism software.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This work was funded by the British Heart Foundation (BHF), the Medical Research Council (MRC) Centre for Transplantation, King’s College London, UK–MRC grant no. MR/J006742/1, and the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy’s and Sthomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London. This project was also funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no (G-438-290-37) to RA. The authors, therefore, acknowledge with thanks DSR for technical and financial support. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.