Bees originated in the wasp family Crabronidae1 during the Cretaceous (113–132 million years ago) when angiosperms became the dominant flowering plants on the planet, and bee ancestors became phytophagous2. This switch from predation to phytophagy led to the remarkable diversification of bees1,2, which today include some 25,000 described species3. Recently, it was described that a Brazilian bee, besides pollen and honey, also needs to consume fungal cells to survive4. The stingless bee Scaptotrigona depilis (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Meliponini) has a fascinating life history, requiring the consumption of a specific brood fungus during larval stage. After S. depilis eggs hatch, a white microbial growth becomes visible at the boundary of the brood cell wall and the surface of the larval food supply4. When first described in 1974, the white microbial growth was hypothesized to be a pathogenic microorganism5. However, it was demonstrated that the microbial mass is composed largely of a symbiotic fungus, initially identified as Monascus sp., which is eaten by the larvae that require it to complete development4. The presence of similar fungus-growing phenomenon was also observed inside brood cells from other stingless bees, such as Tetragona clavipes and Melipona flavolineata6.

The associations between insects and microbes are mediated by several mechanisms, such as nutritional supply, chemical defense and communication. Symbiont microbes are known to produce a range of defensive compounds to protect their hosts against predators, parasites and pathogenic microorganisms7. In most cases, the active compound produced by the defensive microbiota is selective against the system-associated parasite7,8. Attine ants, for example, cultivate fungi for food9,10. The fungal gardens are protected by actinobacteria, which produce small molecules to inhibit the growth of parasitic fungi in the genus Escovopsis11,12. Symbiotic bacteria can also produce pheromones used by their hosts. In the case of locusts Schistocerca gregaria, an aggregation pheromone is produced by gut-associated bacteria13. These examples show how complex and fascinating are such associations.

The discovery of the beneficial symbiosis between S. depilis and the brood cell fungus initiated an important change in our ongoing bee microbiota studies. We sought the molecular basis of this symbiosis. Insects metamorphosis involves the participation of ecdysteroids, which are essential sterol-derived molting hormones that induce the major transformations from immature individuals to adults14,15. Since insects cannot biosynthesize sterols de novo, ecdysteroids are produced from dietary sterols15. Here, we show that Zygosaccharomyces sp. is the fungus eaten by S. depilis larvae and that fungus consumption provides ergosterol to developing bees, allowing successful pupation. Importantly, phylogenetic analyses showed that other cases of bee-Zygosaccharomyces association may exist, opening new perspectives regarding bee-microbe symbiosis.


Zygosaccharomyces sp. is the fungus eaten by S. depilis larvae

In an effort to further understand the S. depilis (Fig. 1a) larvae-fungus interaction, the microbial mass accumulating inside S. depilis brood cells (Fig. 1b,c), and which the larvae eat, was carefully collected and plated on PDA and ISP-2 agar. However, no growth on these plates was obtained. Both PDA and ISP-2 are relatively low osmolarity media. Since the brood cells are filled with very high osmolarity larval food supply, we decided to test for microbial growth in very high osmolarity medium. Indeed, when we used a medium with 30% glucose a yeast from the genus Zygosaccharomyces grew. This fungus grows from the cerumen (Fig. 1c,d) and can be isolated from larval food 3–4 days after the eggs have been laid. Genus-level identification was determined through 18 S and 26 S rRNA DNA sequencing and molecular phylogenetics on isolated strains (Fig. 2, Table 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Characteristics of S. depilis and its food-fungus. (a) S. depilis in the entrance of the colony. (b) Brood cells with newly emerged bees. (c) Zygosaccharomyces sp. pseudomycelium inside S. depilis brood cells. (d) Scanning electron microscopy of S. depilis brood cell fungus.

Figure 2
figure 2

Phylogeny of the LSU gene regions showing Zygosaccharomyces spp. clade in the blue box and Monascus spp. clade in the orange box. Bee-associated strains were highlighted in red, and S. depilis-associated microorganisms were also highlighted in bold.

Table 1 Strains and sequences used in the phylogeny.

The fungus Monascus ruber, described as the symbiotic microorganism in a previous investigation4, was only isolated from S. depilis cerumen. To examine whether this fungus was present in the fungal material eaten by the larvae, we collected the microbial mass growing in approximately 20 brood cells of S. depilis, pooled the material and extracted its DNA. The 18 S rRNA and 26 S genes were amplified and sequenced. The sequences from the fungus collected directly in brood cells were identical to those from Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 (Fig. 2, Supplementary Fig. 1a). To confirm the absence of M. ruber SDCP1 in the material eaten by larvae, specific primers for the 18 S gene regions of Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 and M. ruber SDCP1 were designed (Supplementary Table 1). Using these specific primers, the 18 S regions of each isolated fungus were amplified as controls and compared with the amplicon from the material collected inside brood cells of S. depilis. The results showed that M. ruber was not present, but Zygosaccharomyces sp. 18 S was amplified (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Taken together, these data confirmed that M. ruber can be found in the cerumen, but only Zygosaccharomyces sp. develops the aerial filaments inside brood cells that are eaten by S. depilis larvae.

Zygosaccharomyces sp. has distinctive morphological characteristics

Zygosaccharomyces sp. displays unique growing characteristics in brood cells. This yeast exhibits pseudomycelium formation (Figs 1c and 3a), which has not been previously described for any other member of the Zygosaccharomyces genus16. Under laboratory conditions, Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 shows high degree of pseudohyphae formation, with some structures reaching 100 μm in length without septa (Fig. 3b). Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 invades agar (Fig. 3c) and forms floating pellicles (Supplementary Movie 1, Fig. 3d). Like other members of the Zygosaccharomyces genus16, strain SDBC30G1 forms spores during starvation (Fig. 3e). Additionally, we have observed cytoplasmic accumulation of lipid droplets (LDs) by Zygosaccharomyces sp. under laboratory conditions (Fig. 4a) and when it is growing in the brood cells (Fig. 4b). LDs accumulation suggested a nutritional value of the yeast to the larvae.

Figure 3
figure 3

Growth characteristics of S. depilis-associated Zygosaccharomyces sp. (a) Pseudomycelium of Zygosaccharomyces sp. in S. depilis brood cells. (b) Cells of Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 cultured in 30G broth, pH 4.5. (c) Agar invasion of Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 colony (15GF agar medium, pH 4.5, 30 °C, after 10 days). (d) Pellicle formation of Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 (5 mL, 15GF broth, pH 4.5, static condition, 30 °C, inoculum OD600 0.1, 6-well plates, after 7 days). (e) Ascospores of Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 (30% glucose and 0.5% of yeast extract liquid medium, static condition, 30 °C, inoculum OD600 0.1, after 7 days).

Figure 4
figure 4

Zygosaccharomyces sp. lipid droplets and S. depilis pupation experiments. (a) Fluorescence microscopy of Zygosaccharomyces sp. fixed cells stained by Nile Red to show the presence of cytoplasmic lipid droplets under laboratory conditions and (b) natural conditions (cells of the fungus collected directly from brood cells of S. depilis). (c) Different stages of larval development: (i) 1–2 days-old egg, (ii) 3–4 day-old egg, (iii) 1 day-old larva, (iv) 3–4 day-old larvae (Zygosaccharomyces sp. growth observed), (v) 6–10 day-old larva, (vi) 15–18 day-old pre-pupa, (vii) 20–25 day-old pupa, (viii) 30–34 day-old pupa, (ix) 35–40 day-old emerging bee. (d) Percentage of larvae that completed metamorphosis in vitro without microorganism inoculation (first bar), with fungus collected directly from brood cells (second bar) and with isolated Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1, cultivated in laboratory (third bar), in three different experiments (N = 48 per treatment, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, P < 0.0001 compared with uninoculated control). (e) Percentage of larvae that completed metamorphosis in vitro without fungal or sterol inoculation (first bar), with fungus collected directly from brood cells (second bar) and with ergosterol at 2.5 µM added in the larval food (third bar), in three different experiments (N = 48 per treatment, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, P < 0.0001 compared with untreated control). (f) Chemical structures of ergosterol, cholesterol, 24-epi-makisterone A and 20-hydroxyecdysone.

S. depilis-associated Zygosaccharomyces sp. helps larval development

To verify whether the isolated Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 had the capacity to help larvae development, we performed in vitro larval development assays using 96-well plates with the isolated strain. To that end, larval cultures were initiated by transferring S. depilis eggs into 33 μL of larval food collected with a pipette from brood cells containing eggs. The experiment was performed using eggs to avoid contamination with Zygosaccharomyces sp. found in the larval food during larval stage. Transferring the eggs instead of larvae also avoided collecting larvae that had already eaten the resident fungus. Before the eggs hatched, no Zygosaccharomyces sp. could be grown from the larval food. Notwithstanding, a freeze-thawing sterilization method was used on the collected larval food to further reduce the chance of contaminants.

After the eggs hatched (3–4 days at 29 °C), we inoculated 16 larvae-containing wells with 1 μL of Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 (OD600 45) or 1 μL of an inoculum prepared with the fungus collected directly from brood cells (OD600 38). The inocula were prepared using a 30% glucose broth, and 1 μL of this sterile broth was used as a negative control. The experiment was performed three times using eggs and fungi from, at least, three different S. depilis colonies (Fig. 4c). The average percentage of larvae that completed metamorphosis with the fungus collected directly from brood cells and with the isolated Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 was the same (71%); while the frequency of morphogenesis in non-inoculated larvae was significantly lower (6%) (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, P < 0.0001) (Fig. 4d, Supplementary Fig. 2). Larvae that were not supplemented with fungus showed a delay in development when compared to larvae that ate natural and isolated Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 inoculum. The non-inoculated larvae were arrested in the larval stage, and after two or three weeks they died.

Fungal steroid promotes larval metamorphosis

Based on the in vitro larval assays and Zygosaccharomyces sp. LDs accumulation, we hypothesized that this fungus could be a source of sterols for ecdysteroids and other sterol production. Zygosaccharomyces sp. sterols were extracted and analyzed by GC-MS, and ergosterol was the major one detected (Supplementary Fig. 3). To investigate the effect of ergosterol on S. depilis larval development, in vitro larval culturing experiments were performed where, instead of Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1, we added pure ergosterol. A positive control was performed using Zygosaccharomyces sp. collected directly from brood cells.

The average percentage of pupation after consumption of ergosterol at 0.25 µM was 38% and with ergosterol at 2.5 µM was 65%. Larvae that ate fungal cells pupated at 71% and larvae reared without fungus or sterol displayed a pupation percentage of 8% (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, P < 0.0001; Fig. 4e, Supplementary Fig. 4). The morphogenesis rates were statistically similar when larvae were reared with the Zygosaccharomyces sp. cells or ergosterol at 2.5 µM (Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel, P > 0.05), indicating that pure ergosterol supports larval development.

S. depilis pupae chemical profile

To investigate the ecdysteroids present in S. depilis pupae in natural condition, we collected S. depilis pupae from three different colonies, extracted them separately with methanol and the resulting extracts were analyzed using high-resolution LC-MS. The ion corresponding to makisterone A (MaA) or epi-makisterone A (epi-MaA) was detected in all extracts (Supplementary Fig. 5). The HRMS, m/z 495.3314 [M + H]+ (C28H47O7, error 0.5 ppm), and the MS/MS profile are in accordance with literature data for the isomers MaA or epi-MaA15. The ecdysteroids ecdysone, 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) and 24(28)-dehydromakisterone A (dhMaA) were not detected under the analytical conditions used (Supplementary Fig. 6).


The previous misinterpretation of Monascus sp. as the fungus eaten by S. depilis larvae probably occurred due to inoculation of cerumen fragments during the culturing process coupled to the prior use of media that did not support the growth of osmophilic microorganisms4. Despite the presence of M. ruber SDCP1 in brood cells cerumen, this fungus was not found in the microbial mass eaten by S. depilis larvae. However, the repeated isolation of Monascus strains from S. depilis cerumen4 and other stingless bee colonies17 suggests an ecological significance of fungi from this genus to Meliponini bees. Interestingly, S. depilis-associated M. ruber is highly similar to M. ruber strains isolated from the stingless bee Melipona scutellaris nests collected in the Northeast of Brazil17 (Fig. 2, Table 1). Further investigations are necessary to determine the roles played by Monascus spp. inside colonies of stingless bees.

S. depilis-associated Zygosaccharomyces sp. requires high carbohydrate content and an acidic pH to develop, conditions found in S. depilis sugar-rich brood cells18. This fungus displays pseudomycelium formation, unprecedented for the genus16, flotation and agar invasion (Fig. 3). In brood cells, pseudomycelium and flotation are relevant characteristics of Zygosaccharomyces sp. that make it more available to the larvae. The agar invasion is correlated with the necessity of the fungus to pass the cerumen barrier, and thus, finding the lumen of brood cells. Ascospore formation suggests a possible form of dissemination inside S. depilis colonies and between colonies during swarming. Apparently, sporulation does not occur during the aerial phase inside brood cells, probably due to the high availability of nutrients. All these growth characteristics show Zygosaccharomyces sp. adaptation to survive and proliferates inside S. depilis brood cells, further supporting the specificity of this symbiosis.

The requirement for ergosterol provided by Zygosaccharomyces sp. (Fig. 4e) reveals the intimate dependence of S. depilis on this fungal symbiont. Considering the necessity of steroid sources, S. depilis-Zygosaccharomyces sp. symbiosis may have originally evolved as a nutritional/hormonal supply. Insects biosynthesize fatty acids, but they lack the genes required to produce key enzymes for the final stages of steroids biosynthesis19. They must consume dietary sterols to survive and this nutritional dependence has driven insects to establish intimate relationships with steroid-producing organisms20.

Dietary sterols can be used by insects to produce other steroid-like structures in endogenous metabolizing pathways. One of the most widespread sterol-derived hormone is the ecdysone hydroxylated metabolite 20E (Fig. 4f), responsible for larval maturation and morphogenesis through tissue-specific transcriptional cascade activation21. The production of the C27 ecdysteroid 20E starts with cholesterol (Fig. 4f), which is metabolized by enzymes present in prothoracic glands22. Besides the participation of ecdysteroids in the development of insects, sesquiterpenoids known as juvenile hormones (JHs) are also required. JHs are biosynthesized by insects in the corpora allata gland, and down-regulate metamorphosis. The balance between ecdysteroids and JHs coordinates insect development and maturation14.

Certain insects catalyze 24-dealkylation in phytosterols23 and fungal steroids24,25 to generate cholesterol-like sterols, which can then be metabolized to produce C27 ecdysteroids. However, some species of Hymenoptera, such as the honeybee Apis mellifera, cannot catalyze 24-dealkylation in sterols26. These bees use the C28 ecdysteroid MaA, which is produced from plants steroids, as major molting hormone27. The precursor of MaA seems to be campesterol, a 24-alpha-methyl phytosterol28. MaA C-24 epimer epi-MaA (Fig. 4f) was found as the major ecdysteroid in the fungus-growing ant Acromyrmex octospinosus29, which consumes ergosterol, a 24-beta-methyl sterol produced by the fungal cultivar. The 24(28)-dehydroxylated ecdysteroid dhMaA is also a functional hormone found in Drosophila melanogaster and could be originated from 24(28)-dehydroergosterol. To sum up, the sterol substrate and the enzymatic apparatus found in different insects directly influence their ecdysteroid profile15.

In vitro larval development assays, carried out with ergosterol added in S. depilis larval food, showed that this sterol stimulates pupation in a similar degree as Zygosaccharomyces sp. cells (Fig. 4e). These results indicated that the fungal sterol can join S. depilis endogenous pathways to originate ecdysteroids. We analyzed the chemical profile of S. depilis pupae using high resolution LC-MS, and the ion corresponding to the 24-methylated ecdysteroid MaA or epi-MaA was detected (Supplementary Fig. 5). Ecdysone, 20E and dhMaA were not detected (Supplementary Fig. 6). These data suggested that S. depilis can use C28 ecdysteroids like the honeybee A. mellifera27. Ergosterol-consuming insects produce epi-MaA rather than MaA15,29, supporting that epi-MaA is the molting hormone detected in S. depilis pupae. The use of ergosterol furnished by Zygosaccharomyces sp. represents the fundamental mechanism of a nutritional/hormonal dependence for this intimate bee-fungus symbiosis.

The dependence of S. depilis larvae on sterol supply from Zygosaccharomyces sp. for morphogenesis highlights the importance of preserving bee-associated microbiota. Studies indicate the negative impacts of antifungal pesticides to bee survival. The synergistic effects of neonicotinoids and fungicides was shown to be lethal for A. mellifera30,31, Bombus terrestris and Osmia bicornis31. Frequently, neonicotinoids and fungicides are detected in apicultural products32,33,34, and these compounds could contribute to the decline of bees. Agricultural azoles, such as propiconazole and tebuconazole, act disrupting ergosterol production by blocking the CYP51 sterol 14-alpha-demethylase35. The depletion of ergosterol biosynthesis decreases fungus viability and could negatively impact S. depilis larval development. More efforts should be done to test antifungal pesticides safety, mainly to wild bees, which are commonly neglected in these studies.

The interactions between yeasts and insects are ancient, but still poorly understood. Fungus-growing ants of the genus Cyphomyrmex cultivate basidiomycetous yeast as a food source36. A Saccharomycete engages in a symbiotic relationship with the non-social beetle Doubledaya bucculenta and seems to be important to the larval development37. Drosophila melanogaster is a vector of a yeast-community in banana fruits, where their larvae develop38. Fungi in the genus Zygosaccharomyces have been previously reported from other bees, including bumblebees39, honeybees40,41, and stingless bees41,42. The Zygosaccharomyces strains associated with S. depilis from this study form a monophyletic group that is the sister group to a lineage that includes several bee-associated Zygosaccharomyces spp. (Fig. 2, Table 1). Taken together, this suggests similar cases of fungus-bee symbioses may exist.

Here, we report the relationship of an osmophilic fungus, which proliferates inside S. depilis brood cells, and benefits the stingless bee through the production of a fungal sterol that can be converted into an essential steroid hormone. There is no previous study regarding a bee consuming a fungus as a sterol source to help larval development. The specialized chemical-ecological interaction between S. depilis and Zygosaccharomyces sp. suggests that the antifungal pesticides used to protect agriculture crops could be having substantial impacts on plant pollinator population through the disruption of the bee-associated fungal community.

Experimental Procedures

Insect collection and microbial isolation

The experiments were performed using S. depilis colonies maintained in wood hives at University of São Paulo, Faculty of Philosophy, Sciences and Letters of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil (SISBIO authorization 46555-5, CNPq process 010936/2014-9). For microbial isolation, samples from brood cells (cerumen, larval food and white microorganism growing inside brood cells) were carefully collected and aseptically plated on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA), International Streptomyces Project medium number 2 (ISP-2) with 2% agar and 30 G medium (30 g of glucose, 3 g of malt extract, 3 g of yeast extract and 2 g of agar to 100 mL of deionized water, pH adjusted to pH 4.5 or pH 6.0 with hydrochloric acid 1 N). The 15GF medium (15 g of glucose, 15 g of fructose, 3 g of malt extract, 3 g of yeast extract and 2 g of agar to 100 mL of deionized water, pH adjusted to pH 4.5 or pH 6.0 with hydrochloric acid 1 N) was also used for osmophilic microorganism growth. The plates were incubated at 30 °C until microbial growth. Zygosaccharomyces sp. lineages were isolated from four different S. depilis colonies.

Nucleic acid extraction for amplification and sequencing

The samples of fungus from 20 brood cells of S. depilis were collected, pooled and frozen in liquid nitrogen in a 0.5 mL tube. To this sample, 100 μL of lysis buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 250 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA and 1% SDS, w/v) was added and mixed thoroughly. The sample was subjected to six alternate cycles of freezing in liquid nitrogen and incubation at 90 °C for 1 min, followed by freezing and a final incubation at 90 °C for 10 min. The tube was centrifuged at 11000 g for 3 min and the supernatant collected carefully. The supernatant was passed through a DNA purification column (QIAquick, Qiagen) according the manufacturer instructions. The purified DNA was eluted in 50 μL of 1 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.5 prewarmed to 55 °C. DNA extractions from isolated microorganisms were performed using FastDNA SPIN Kit for soil (MP), according the manufacturer instructions.

Isolated strains were identified by 18 S rRNA sequencing using the primers NS1 (5′-GTAGTCATATGCTTGTCTC-3′) and NS4 (5′-CTTCCGTCAATTCCTTTAAG-3′)43, and D1/D2 26 S rRNA sequencing using the primers NL1 (5′-GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG-3′) and NL4 (5′-GGTCCGTGTTTCAAGACGG-3′). The 18 S sequences were also used to design specific primers for these fungi (Supplementary Table 1). Additionally, for M. ruber SDCP1 identification, it was used a taxonomic methodology44.

Phylogenetic analyses

For phylogenetic analyses, the evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Tamura-Nei model45. The tree with the highest log likelihood was used. Bootstrap values (1000 bootstraps) are shown as a percentage. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the Maximum Composite Likelihood (MCL) approach, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths measured in the number of substitutions per site. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA746.

Extraction and analyzes of Zygosaccharomyces sp. sterols

Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 was cultivated in 30G agar medium (pH 6.0), for 15 days at 29 °C. Then, the cells were harvested and washed twice with sterile deionized water, and a cell suspension of OD600 32 was prepared. From this suspension, 250 µL were taken and extracted with 750 µL of chloroform:methanol (2:1) solution. The mixture was vortexed for 2 min, incubated in ice for 30 min and centrifuged for 3 min at 13000 rpm. The organic phase was analyzed at the Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry Center (CEMMO-FCFRP-USP) using a Shimadzu QP-2010 GC-MS. The column applied was the Rtx-5MS (RESTEK) (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 µm), injection temperature of 260 °C, interface temperature of 300 °C, ionization source at 250 °C, splitless mode. The gradient was 60 °C for 4 min, increasing 10 °C per min until 300 °C and remaining at 300 °C for 20 min.

Larvae in vitro culturing with Zygosaccharomyces sp

Larval food from brood cells containing eggs was aseptically collected, sterilized by freeze-thawing (−80 °C for 20 min followed by 60 °C for 3 min), and 33 μL of this larval food were transferred to individual wells of a 96-well plate. Then, S. depilis eggs were carefully transferred to each well. The plates were incubated at 29 °C for 3–4 days, until the eggs hatched. The inocula of Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 were prepared using 30G broth (pH 6.0) from 10–15 day-old cultures in 30 G agar medium (pH 6.0) at 29 °C. Several inocula were tested, and the best results were obtained from inocula with OD600 45, which 1 μL resulted in a final inoculum of approximately 1 × 106 CFU.mL−1 in each well containing larva. The inoculum prepared from Zygosaccharomyces sp. cells collected directly from brood cells presented a higher cell viability and grew faster than the inoculum prepared from Zygosaccharomyces sp. maintained in laboratory. So, a smaller inoculum from the brood cells resident fungus (OD600 38) was used, and 1 μL from this inoculum also gave approximately 1 × 106 CFU.mL−1 in each well containing larva. For the treatment without fungus (negative control), 1 μL of 30 G broth (pH 6.0) was transferred to the wells containing larvae. The cultures were monitored for 40–45 days, until the complete larval development. The experiments were performed three times, using eggs and resident fungus from different colonies of S. depilis.

Larvae in vitro culturing with ergosterol

The procedure described for larvae culturing with Zygosaccharomyces sp. was also performed for larval in vitro assays with ergosterol (Sigma-Aldrich). The sterol was dissolved in ethyl acetate and transferred to the larval food to give final concentrations of 2.5 and 0.25 µM (maximum of 2% ethyl acetate in the larval food). As positive control, larvae were reared with cells of Zygosaccharomyces sp. collected directly from S. depilis brood cells (OD600 38); and as negative control, larvae were reared without fungus or sterol. To eliminate the possibility of ethyl acetate interference, the positive and negative controls also received 2% of the solvent.

Zygosaccharomyces sp. lipid droplets staining

Zygosaccharomyces sp. LDs staining was performed according Hoiczyk and collaborators47. Fixed cells in a glass slide were stained for 30 min with 50 μL of Nile Red (Sigma-Aldrich) in ethanol (10 μg.mL−1), washed briefly with water and observed on confocal microscope Leica SP5 at the Multiuser Laboratory of Confocal Microscopy, University of São Paulo (LMMC, FAPESP 2004/08868-0). Cells were taken from a Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1 culture in 15GF broth (pH 4.5, seven days old culture at 30 °C, static condition, initial inoculum OD600 0.1), and directly from S. depilis brood cells.

Extraction and metabolic profiling of S. depilis pupae

S. depilis pupae from three different colonies were collected directly from brood cells and frozen using liquid nitrogen. The material from each colony was treated separately. The pupae were triturated and a sample of 100 mg was sonicated with 1 mL of methanol in a 2 mL centrifuge tube for 10 min, and extracted for 60 min in room temperature. Solvent was dried, the crude extract was dissolved with 1 mL of methanol:water (1:9 v/v) and cleaned by solid-phase extraction (1 mL LC-C18 SPE Tubes, 100 mg, SupelcleanTM). Analyses were performed using a Shimadzu UFLC coupled to a Phenomenex C18(2) Luna (5 µm; 100 A; 250 × 4.6 mm) column and with the micrOTOF Q II Mass Spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, EUA). Samples (20 µL) were analyzed using a gradient of acetonitrile and water, both containing 0.1% of formic acid, as follows: 0–5 min isocratic of 10% of acetonitrile, gradient from 10% of acetonitrile in 5 min to 100% of acetonitrile in 60 min, isocratic of 100% of acetonitrile until 70 min, gradient to 10% of acetonitrile from 70 to 75 min, and isocratic of 10% of acetonitrile until 85 min; flow of 1 mL.min−1. For the HR-ESI-MS analysis, plate voltage was 500 V, capillary voltage was 3.5 kV, dry temperature was 220 °C, and dry gas (N2) flow was 10 mL.min−1.

Statistical analyses

We performed Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test using the XLSTAT software, version 2016. All tests were carried out in three independent replicates, each replicate an n equal to 16, resulting in a total of 48 larvae for each treatment. The calculated P values were reported in the results and figure legends.

Data availability

The 18 S sequences from Zygosaccharomyces sp. SDBC30G1, fungal sample collected from S. depilis brood cells and M. ruber SDCP1 were deposited in the GenBank nucleotide database with accession numbers KX999554, KX999556 and KX999557, respectively. The D1/D1 26 S sequences from S. depilis-associated Zygosaccharomyces sp. strains and M. ruber SDCP1 were also deposited in the GenBank nucleotide database and the accession numbers are described in the Table 1.