Structural basis of thalidomide enantiomer binding to cereblon

Mori, Tomoyuki; Ito, Takumi; Liu, Shujie; Ando, Hideki; Sakamoto, Satoshi; Yamaguchi, Yuki; Tokunaga, Etsuko; Shibata, Norio; Handa, Hiroshi; Hakoshima, Toshio

doi:10.1038/s41598-018-19202-7

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 22 January 2018

Structural basis of thalidomide enantiomer binding to cereblon

Tomoyuki Mori ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0003-2019-5370¹^na1,
Takumi Ito^2,3^na1,
Shujie Liu⁴,
Hideki Ando²,
Satoshi Sakamoto⁴,
Yuki Yamaguchi⁴,
Etsuko Tokunaga⁵,
Norio Shibata ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3742-4064⁵,
Hiroshi Handa² &
…
Toshio Hakoshima¹

Scientific Reports volume 8, Article number: 1294 (2018) Cite this article

26k Accesses
68 Citations
36 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

Thalidomide possesses two optical isomers which have been reported to exhibit different pharmacological and toxicological activities. However, the precise mechanism by which the two isomers exert their different activities remains poorly understood. Here, we present structural and biochemical studies of (S)- and (R)-enantiomers bound to the primary target of thalidomide, cereblon (CRBN). Our biochemical studies employed deuterium-substituted thalidomides to suppress optical isomer conversion, and established that the (S)-enantiomer exhibited ~10-fold stronger binding to CRBN and inhibition of self-ubiquitylation compared to the (R)-enantiomer. The crystal structures of the thalidomide-binding domain of CRBN bound to each enantiomer show that both enantiomers bind the tri-Trp pocket, although the bound form of the (S)-enantiomer exhibited a more relaxed glutarimide ring conformation. The (S)-enantiomer induced greater teratogenic effects on fins of zebrafish compared to the (R)-enantiomer. This study has established a mechanism by which thalidomide exerts its effects in a stereospecific manner at the atomic level.

Copper-catalysed asymmetric hydroboration of alkenes with 1,2-benzazaborines to access chiral naphthalene isosteres

Article 08 April 2024

Wanlan Su, Jide Zhu, … Qiuling Song

Stereoretentive enantioconvergent reactions

Article Open access 17 April 2024

Steven H. Bennett, Jacob S. Bestwick, … Andrew L. Lawrence

RNAi-based drug design: considerations and future directions

Article 03 April 2024

Qi Tang & Anastasia Khvorova

Introduction

More than 50 years have passed since thalidomide was first prescribed as a sedative and antiemetic to provide effective relief from morning sickness during early pregnancy. The teratogenic effects associated with its use were soon discovered along with severe birth defects such as phocomelia and amelia^1,2,3. Pharmacological studies aimed at delineating the cause of thalidomide-induced teratogenicity led to the discovery of a number of unexpected pharmacological activities including anti-inflammatory, inhibition of tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α production and anti-angiogenic effects^4,5,6. Other studies demonstrated thalidomide-induced oxidative stress, which results in DNA damage or perturbation of the signaling pathways involving NF-κB or Bmp/Dkk1/Wnt^7,8,9,10. Thalidomide and its derivatives are now widely used as potent immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) in the treatment of several diseases including multiple myeloma (MM) and leprosy (Hansen’s disease)^11,12,13,14. Furthermore, thalidomide has recently been investigated in the treatment of vascular diseases^15,16.

Thalidomide is the small synthetic compound α-phthalimido-glutarimide (IUPAC systematic name, 3-(RS)-2-(2,6-dioxo-3-piperidyl)isoindole-1,3-dione), which possesses one chiral centre (the C3-carbon atom of the glutarimide ring), and comprises a racemic mixture of two optical isomers, (R)- (also (+)-) and (S)- (also (−)-) enantiomers, currently in clinical use. The (R)- and (S)-enantiomers were once thought to be responsible for the sedative and teratogenic effects, respectively. This idea was challenged by the findings that the (R)-enantiomer is also teratogenic in a rabbit model^11,12 and that interconversion of the enantiomers could occur under physiological conditions^17,18,19. However, a number of reports, including some describing the use of configuration-stable thalidomide analogues, have shown that the (S)-enantiomer is more teratogenic and effective at inhibiting TNF-α production and angiogenesis compared to the (R)-enantiomer^{20,21,22,23,24}.

Thalidomide directly binds cereblon (CRBN), which was originally reported as a cerebral protein associated with mild mental retardation^25,26. CRBN is a highly conserved protein that forms a CRL4-type E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, CRL4^CRBN, with Cul4A and damaged DNA binding protein 1 (DDB1), and plays a key role in limb outgrowth and expression of fibroblast growth factor Fgf8 in zebrafish and chicks²⁵. Thalidomide is suggested to initiate its teratogenic effects by binding to CRBN and modulating the associated ubiquitin ligase activity²⁵. Moreover, a human MM cell line with deletion of the CRBN gene was shown to be resistant to thalidomide derivatives, indicating that CRBN is involved in both the teratogenic and beneficial effects of thalidomide²⁷. Recent crystallographic studies of human, mouse and chick CRBN have succeeded in elucidating the manner by which thalidomide and its derivatives bind the tri-Trp pocket formed by three conserved surface tryptophan residues in the thalidomide-binding domain (TBD) of CRBN^28,29. In these studies, however, all experiments were performed using racemic compounds, hence enantiomer-specific differences in CRBN binding were not addressed. The precise manner by which these enantiomers exert their different pharmacological and toxicological effects remained unanswered. Here, we report on a series of crystallographic and biochemical studies investigating the interaction between each thalidomide enantiomer and CRBN, and provide a structural basis for the differences in CRBN binding and stereospecific effects of thalidomide on teratogenicity.

Results

Differences in CRBN binding affinity between (S)- and (R)- thalidomides assayed using deuterium-substituted enantiomers

Since interconversion of thalidomide enantiomers could occur under physiological conditions, special precautions are required to delineate any enantiomer-specific differences in the biological activity of thalidomide. To this end, we synthesized each thalidomide enantiomer with deuterium substitution of the hydrogen atom bonded to the chiral carbon atom (C3, Fig. 1a), hereafter deuterated (S)- and (R)-thalidomides are referred to as (S)-D-Thal and (R)-D-Thal in Figs 1 and 2. Deuterated thalidomides have been found to be at least five times more stable than thalidomide with respect to racemization³⁰. We initially compared the CRBN-binding affinity of the enantiomers in a competitive binding assay with each deuterated thalidomide enantiomer chemically coupled to ferrite beads (Fig. 1b). CRBN bound to the beads was eluted by the addition of deuterated (S)- or (R)- thalidomide in a concentration-dependent manner. We found that the binding affinity of CRBN to the (S)-enantiomer was ~10-fold stronger than that to the (R)-enantiomer. This is consistent with a previous demonstration that non-deuterated (S)-thalidomide binds CRBN more tightly than the (R)-enantiomer by competition for thalidomide-immobilized beads²⁸. The aforementioned conclusion is further supported by results of a cell-based assay, in which deuterated (S)-thalidomide inhibited the auto-ubiquitylation activity of the CRBN-containing ubiquitin ligase complex more strongly than deuterated (R)-thalidomide (Fig. 1c), and is consistent with previous results utilizing non-deuterated thalidomide²⁸. Considering their half-lives of racemization, which occurs in a matter of hours with non-deuterated thalidomide under physiological conditions^{11,12,18,19,21,24,25}, only a very small fraction of each enantiomer is thought to be racemized during the assay. To confirm this hypothesis, we analyzed the enantiomeric purities of all the thalidomides used before and after the experiments. The purities were monitored by HPLC (DAICEL Chiralpak IA, 4.6 × 250 mm, MeOH = 100%, flow rate 1.0 ml/min, λ = 254 nm). (Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 1). No significant racemization was detected for the non-deuterated thalidomides and no racemization was detected for the deuterated thalidomides. These results are consistent with a previous report indicating that the racemization of thalidomide is slow under lower or neutral pH conditions, while the racemization is accelerated under higher pH values³⁰. The half-life of racemization of (S)-thalidomide was 31.8 h at 6.18 pH and 29.9 h at pH 7.78 (at 37 °C), while that of deuterated (S)-thalidomide was 156.3 h at pH 6.18 and 59.5 h at pH 7.78³⁰. The pH values of the medium solutions used in the current experiments were 5.76 for the Zebrafish E3 medium (5 mM NaCl, 0.17, mM KCl, 0.33 mM MgSO₄, and 0.33 mM CaCl₂), 6.54 for the DMEM (Nacalai) Auto-Ub medium and 7.05 for the RPMI1640 MM1S medium, suggesting that both thalidomide and deuterated thalidomide are rather stable toward racemization in each medium used in our assays.

We also determined the dissociation constants K_D for the binding of non-deuterated (S)- and (R)-thalidomide to human and mouse CRBN TBDs by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). The results show that (S)-thalidomide binds TBD 6- or 9-fold more tightly than (R)-thalidomide in terms of the K_D values (Supplementary Fig. 2). These results collectively suggest that differences in the pharmacological activity of the enantiomers are determined, at least in part, by their differential binding affinity to CRBN.

Deuterated (S)- and (R)- thalidomides showed differences in IKZF degradation

Recent studies have shown that lenalidomide and pomalidomide directly bind CRBN and promote the recruitment of pseudo-substrates Ikaros (IKZF1) and Aiolos (IKZF3) to the E3 complex containing CRBN, thus leading to ubiquitylation and degradation^31,32. We set out to determine whether enantiomers exert differential effects on the down-stream substrate IKZF1/3. We examined IKZF3 degradation in MM1S cells with deuterated (S)- and (R)-thalidomides (Fig. 2a). The breakdown of IKZF3 was observed in the presence of deuterated (S)-thalidomide ((S)-D-Thal in Fig. 2a). However, no discernible breakdown of IKZF3 was observed with deuterated (R)-thalidomide. Furthermore, we performed a co-immunoprecipitation assay for CRBN binding to IKZF3 in the presence of deuterated (S)- or (R)-thalidomide (Fig. 2b). We observed strong CRBN binding to IKZF3 in the presence of deuterated (S)-thalidomide. On the other hand, the effect by deuterated (R)-thalidomide on the binding was very weak. These results support the notion that the binding affinity of CRBN to the (S)-enantiomer was stronger than that to the (R)-enantiomer and, that the difference in binding affinity affects degradation of the down-stream substrates.

Common binding model of (S)- and (R)-thalidomides to the tri-Trp pocket

In an effort to clarify the differences in CRBN binding at the structural level, we determined the structure of mouse CRBN TBD bound to (S)- or (R)-thalidomide and refined the structures at 1.8 Å and 2.0 Å resolution, respectively (Tables 1 and 2). Both structures gave clear electron densities for the bound thalidomide molecules (Fig. 3a). CRBN TBD consists of eight β-strands (β1-β8) with a single zinc ion, which is coordinated by four conserved cysteine residues from two CXXC motifs located in the β1-β2 and β5-β6 loops (Fig. 3b and Supplementary Fig. 3). The central β-sheet (β4-β5-β6-β7-β3) contains the tri-Trp pocket formed by Trp383 (β4-β5 loop), Trp389 (β5-strand) and Trp403 (β6-strand). (S)-thalidomide binds this pocket so that the glutarimide ring is docked into the tri-Trp pocket, and the phthalimido group is located outside of the pocket (Fig. 3b). Inside the pocket, the glutarimide ring, which is sandwiched between Trp383 and Trp389, makes nonpolar contacts with Trp403 forming the floor of the pocket and forms two hydrogen bonds with the protein: the glutarimide 6-carbonyl group forms a hydrogen bond to the main-chain amide of Trp383 and the glutarimide 1-imino group (NH) forms a hydrogen bond to the main-chain carbonyl group of His381 (Fig. 3c). These characteristics of the binding mode are identical to those observed for (R)-thalidomide (Fig. 3d) and do not differ from those detailed in previous reports^28,29. No significant structural differences were found between the overall structures of TBDs bound to (S)- and (R)-thalidomide, as reflected in the extremely small root-mean-square (rms) deviation (0.13 Å) (Fig. 4a). Additionally, these structures are similar to the free forms²⁸ (0.45–0.46 Å) and other reported structures^28,29 (Fig. 4b,c), although the β2-β3 loop displays conformational flexibility with relatively high temperature factors, as observed in the free forms²⁸ (Fig. 4d). In addition to the similarity in the overall structures, the thalidomide-binding sites also exhibit high similarity without any significant structural deviation between the (S)- and (R)-thalidomide-bound forms (Fig. 4e).

Table 1 Crystallographic statistics of the CRBN TBD bound to thalidomides.

Full size table

Table 2 Structural refinement statistics of the CRBN TBD bound to thalidomides.

Full size table

The observed high similarity in the structures of the thalidomide-binding sites, the binding modes, and overall TBD structures of our complexes imply that other factors are responsible for the differences in the binding affinity of (S)- and (R)-thalidomides.

Conformational differences between bound (S)- and (R)-thalidomides

The electron density maps of our complex structures are sufficiently clear to define the conformation of the bound thalidomide molecules (Fig. 3a). We then examined the thalidomide conformation in the CRBN-bound state. Our crystals contain 16 crystallographically independent CRBN TBD-thalidomide complexes in the asymmetric unit (see the Experimental section). We found that the 16 (S)-thalidomide molecules bound to CRBN TBD display essentially the same conformation with a small averaged rms deviation of 0.056 Å (Supplementary Fig. 4a). Similarly, the 16 (R)-thalidomide molecules display essentially the same conformation, which is distinct from that of (S)-thalidomide as described below, and exhibit a small averaged rms deviation of 0.074 Å (Supplementary Fig. 4b). These results suggest that (S)- and (R)-thalidomide molecules bound to CRBN have a defined conformation but no variable conformations.

In both enantiomeric structures, the phthalimide ring is tilted against the glutarimide ring by 75° so that two protruding carbonyl groups of the phthalimide ring are docked into grooves at the pocket entrance: the phthalimido 1-carbonyl group into the groove between Trp383 and Trp403, and the 3-carbonyl group into the groove between Trp389 and His381 (Fig. 5a,b). Thus, the phthalimide ring is locked at the pocket entrance and the rotational conformation of the phthalimide ring around the C-N bond between the phthalimide and glutarimide rings is the same in both enantiomers. Overlay of the bound (S)- and (R)-thalidomide molecules shows good overlap of the molecules with a relatively small shift in orientation of the phthalimide ring (Fig. 5c). This shift is caused by the different nature of the glutarimide ring conformation. The glutarimide ring of (S)-thalidomide displays a C4-endo puckered conformation, a relaxed and stable five-membered ring conformation, in which the C4-carbon atom is displaced from the plane formed by the rest of the ring atoms. This puckered form closely resembles that observed in the isolated free form of thalidomide^33,34 (Fig. 5d). Compared to the free form, the CRBN-bound form has a small shift (0.5 Å) of the phthalimide ring toward the endo direction (middle in Fig. 5d) so as to fit the grooves of the entrance of the tri-Trp pocket (Fig. 5a).

In sharp contrast to the relaxed form of the bound (S)-thalidomide, CRBN-bound (R)-thalidomide has the glutarimide ring in a twisted conformation, which is distinct from the stereochemically relaxed C4-exo puckered conformation of (R)-thalidomide (Fig. 5e), suggesting that bound (R)-thalidomide is structurally constrained in a metastable conformational state. The twisted conformation is forced primarily by the contacts between the phthalimide ring and the entrance of the tri-Trp pocket and accompanies a large displacement (1.7 Å) of the phthalimide ring toward the endo direction (middle in Fig. 5e). This displacement needs to avoid steric clash of the phthalimido-1-carbonyl group against the groove formed by Trp403 and Trp383, and enables the protruding carbonyl groups to dock into the grooves (Fig. 5b). To visualize the steric hindrance, we superimposed the free form of (R)-thalidomide onto the CRBN-bound form of (R)-thalidomide found in the crystal (Fig. 6). We found that the C4-exo conformation of the free form causes serious steric clash (2.6 Å) of the phthalimido-1-carbonyl group against the ring carbon atom of Trp383 (indicated by a dotted line in Fig. 6). The twisted conformation of the bound (R)-thalidomide avoids this clash by shifting the phthalimide ring toward the endo direction (1.7 Å, green arrow). Moreover, close inspection of the glutarimide ring puckering by modelling revealed that (R)-thalidomide in the C4-exo puckered glutarimide ring conformation causes steric clash of the C4-carbon atom against Trp383. To avoid this clash, the glutarimide ring is also forced to adopt a twisted conformation. All of these relatively small but significant differences in the binding mode between (S)- and (R)-thalidomide molecules suggest that the (S)-thalidomide bound state of the thalidomide-CRBN complex is more stable than the (R)-thalidomide bound state. As with the previous structures^28,29, our structure of thalidomide-bound CRBN TBD prepared with racemic thalidomide revealed that the bound thalidomide molecules are all (S)-enantiomers (Supplementary Fig. 5). This is also consistent with the notion that CRBN preferentially binds the (S)-enantiomer.

Dependence of thalidomide-induced teratogenicity on chirality

In an effort to examine the effects of thalidomide enantiomers on zebrafish development, we transferred dechorionated embryos to media containing different concentrations of thalidomide at 2 hours post fertilization (hpf) and allowed them to develop for 3 days. It was apparent that with thalidomide-treated embryos, the development of pectoral fins and otic vesicles was disturbed (Fig. 7a). Treatment with 200 μM (S)-thalidomide induced severe defects on fins, whereas treatment with 200 μM (R)-thalidomide resulted in no discernible severe defects (Fig. 7b). At higher concentrations (400 μM) of drug, (S)-thalidomide induced defects in more than 80% of fish with a higher population of defective embryos, whereas (R)-thalidomide induced defects in only 50% of fish with a lower population of defects. Thus, (S)-thalidomide exerts greater teratogenic effects on fin development of zebrafish, which is consistent with the results of our binding and ubiquitylation-inhibition assays using deuterium-substituted thalidomide enantiomers (Fig. 1), and also the results of the complex structures between TBD and each thalidomide enantiomer.

Discussion

Based on our complex structures, we are now able to assess the CRBN-binding affinity of thalidomide derivatives. The glutarimide ring in a relaxed six-membered ring conformation is important for CRBN binding with the imide group, serving as both a hydrogen donor and acceptor. Based on the chemical nature of the glutarimide ring, five carbon atoms (C1-3, C5 and C6) of the ring favor an in-plane arrangement because of the sp2 configuration of two carbonyl carbon atoms (C2 and C6) with the amido (CONHCO) π electron resonance. Thus, ring puckering usually occurs at the C4 carbon atom. In the isolated state, the C4-endo conformation of the (S)-thalidomide glutarimide ring minimizes the conformational energy by allowing the N-C bond at the chiral C3 atom to be oriented in a stable equatorial conformation, whereas (R)-thalidomide favors the C4-exo conformer of the glutarimide ring, allowing the N-C bond to adopt an equatorial conformation. In the C4-endo conformer of the (S)-thalidomide glutarimide ring, the chiral centre tilts the phthalimido group slightly toward the endo direction (bottom in Fig. 5d), which is suitable for binding to the tri-Trp pocket of CRBN TBD. Therefore, small adjustment of the orientation of the phthalimido group is sufficient for CRBN binding (middle in Fig. 5d). In the C4-exo conformer of the (R)-thalidomide glutarimide ring, however, the chiral centre tilts the phthalimido group slightly toward the exo direction (bottom in Fig. 5e), which is in the opposite direction required for binding to the tri-Trp pocket. In this case, small adjustment of the orientation of the phthalimido group is insufficient for CRBN binding, and therefore the glutarimide ring pucker of (R)-thalidomide needs to be changed to the twist conformation, C4-exo-C5-endo, to shift the phthalimido group up toward the endo direction (middle in Fig. 5e) for CRBN binding with loss of conformational energy. It should be noted that this enantiomer-specific discrimination by the tri-Trp pocket is mediated by hydrogen bonding interactions between the amide group of the glutarimide ring and the inside of the pocket, in addition to contacts between carbonyl groups of the phthalimido group and the entrance of the pocket.

Lenalidomide and pomalidomide have attracted much attention from pharmaceutical scientists and physicians as hopeful IMiDs in the treatment of multiple myeloma and other cancers^11,14. The homeobox transcription factor MEIS2, has been implicated in various aspects of human development, has been suggested to be an endogenous substrate of CRL4^CRBN, and IMiDs block MEIS2 from binding to CRL4^CRBN ²⁸. Contrary to this inhibition of substrate binding, these drugs directly bind CRBN and promote CRL4^CRBN binding to IKZF1 and IKZF3, leading to ubiquitylation and degradation^31,32. Furthermore, in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with deletion of chromosome 5q (del(5q)), lenalidomide induces ubiquitylation of casein kinase 1A1 (CK1α) and its degradation³⁵. One attractive hypothesis concerning IMiDs drawn from these IMiD-dependent degradations is that IMiDs act as modulators of CRL4^CRBN substrate recognition by playing a role as a molecular glue³⁶ or an interfacial drug³⁷ that specifically links CRBN and substrate proteins through direct interactions with both proteins. The binding mode of IMiDs to CRBN suggests that the phthalimido group should make contact with the substrate proteins. Since the orientation of the phthalimido group of CRBN-bound IMiDs differs somewhat between (S) and (R)-enantiomers, we speculate that CRBN bound to the (S) and (R) enantiomers may exhibit different binding affinity to the substrates. The recent structure of the complex between lenalidomide-bound CRBN and CK1α has shown that CK1α binding repositions the phthalimido ring of lenalidomide 2.5 Å toward CRBN residue Glu377³⁸. Interestingly, this shift accompanies a movement of the phthalimido group toward the endo direction as seen in (S)-thalidomide (Fig. 5d), suggesting that the (S)-enantiomer is favored for CK1α binding. However, details of the differences between (S)- and (R)-enantiomers in CK1α binding should be clarified by further studies.

As with previously reported structures^28,29, binding to CRBN is primarily mediated by the glutarimide ring. Correspondingly, glutarimide alone is able to bind CRBN and inhibit ubiquitylation to a similar extent as (R)-thalidomide (Fig. 8a,b and Supplementary Fig. 6), whereas phthalimide and glutaric anhydride, which lack the ring amide of glutarimide, exhibit no binding (Fig. 8c,d). Both carbonyl groups of glutarimide are important, and the absence of one carbonyl group results in loss of binding (δ-valerolactam in Fig. 8d). Bulky modification of the glutarimide C4-carbon atom also results in loss of CRBN binding due to steric clashes (cycloheximide in Fig. 8d). Upon ingestion, thalidomide undergoes enzymatic and nonenzymatic modification and breakdown, yielding a number of metabolites with a peak plasma concentration at 3–6 h^2,39,40. The primary metabolic derivatives generated by cytochrome P450 isozymes are derived from 4- or 5-hydroxylation of the phthalimido moiety or 5-hydroxylation of the glutarimide moiety, which subsequently undergo spontaneous hydrolysis^12,41 (Supplementary Fig. 7). Based on our structural data, metabolites with phthalimido modifications may still bind CRBN, whereas 4- or 5-hydroxylation of the glutarimide moiety is likely to result in loss of binding due to steric clashes. Hydrolysis yields three primary products (I-III in Supplementary Fig. 7) by ring opening followed by further degradation into eight minor products^{42,43,44,45,46,47}. We suggest classifying the hydrolysis processes into three pathways A, B and C. Compounds in pathway A retain the intact glutarimide ring and likely still bind CRBN, while compounds in pathways B and C with opened glutarimide rings do not bind CRBN.

In conclusion, our study provides a structural framework for further investigations on the mechanisms of the pharmaceutical and teratogenic actions of this drug and for the development of more effective IMiDs.

Methods

Protein expression and purification

Mouse CRBN TBD (residues 322–430) was cloned into pGEX6P-3 (GE Healthcare) and transformed into Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3) Star (Invitrogen). The E. coli cells were cultured at 25 °C in TB-5052 medium⁴⁸ containing 50 μM zinc acetate. The supernatant of the cell lysate was applied to a Glutathione Sepharose 4B resin (GE Healthcare) and resin-bound GST-fusion protein was cleaved from the resin using 4 units/ml HRV3C protease (Merck). Eluted protein fractions were further purified by cation exchange (HiTrap SP HP, GE Healthcare) and gel-filtration (Superdex 75 pg, GE Healthcare) chromatography. Purified CRBN protein sample was dialyzed against a buffer solution containing 0.1 mM thalidomide (SIGMA), 5 mM sodium acetate (pH 6.0) and 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (changed three times). Tris-(2-carboxyethyl)-phosphine (TCEP) was added to the protein sample solution up to 10 mM. Purified proteins were analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS; Bruker Daltonics). MALDI-TOF MS of mouse and human TBD domains gave peaks at 12321.2 Da (calculated 12321.1 Da) and 12,456.4 Da (12,477.1 Da), respectively.

Crystallization

Crystallization conditions were searched for using the sitting-drop vapour diffusion method and Hydra II-Plus-One crystallization robot (Matrix Technology) with a commercial crystallization solution kit. The best crystals of the (S)-, (R)-, and racemic thalidomide-bound form of mouse TBD were obtained from a 1:1 mixture solution comprising 30 mg/ml of the protein solution (in 5 mM sodium acetate (pH 6.0), 10 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 10 mM TCEP and 0.1 mM thalidomide) and reservoir solution (100 mM sodium acetate (pH 5.0) and 400–600 mM ammonium sulphate). Crystals appeared within 10 days at 4 °C. The 50–100 μm chunky crystals were transferred into reservoir solution containing 30% glycerol and then flash-cooled in liquid nitrogen.

Data collection

Diffraction tests of the crystals were performed using a Rigaku R-AXIS VII detector equipped with a Rigaku FR-E X-ray generator. For structure determination, diffraction data of native and SeMet-labelled crystals were collected at 100 K with the MX225HE detector on BL41XU and BL44XU beamlines at the SPring-8 synchrotron facility (Table 1). Diffraction data were processed using the HKL2000 program⁴⁹. Crystals of the three thalidomide-bound forms belong to space group R3(H), with V_M values in the range 2.54–266 Å³/Da, suggesting a solvent content of 51–53% assuming 16 proteins in the asymmetric unit.

Structure determination and refinement

The crystal structures of the thalidomide-bound forms were determined by molecular replacement using the model structure of mouse CRBN TBD (PDB code: 3WX2)²⁸ as a search model. The built model was refined through alternating cycles using the Coot⁵⁰ and CNS programs⁵¹ or REFMAC⁵². For model building and refinements, composite omit maps were calculated with CNS programs⁵¹ and ligand parameters were generated using PRODRG2⁵³. The secondary structures of models were calculated using DSSP⁵⁴. The refinement statistics are summarized in Table 2. These crystals contain 16 molecules in the asymmetric unit. Of these, 15 molecules form 5 trimers similar to those of the free form but with non-crystallographic three-fold axes, while one molecule forms a trimer with symmetry-related molecules related by a crystallographic three-fold axis. No significant structural deviations were found among these molecules with small averaged rms deviations (0.38–0.40 Å). No outliers were flagged in the Ramachandran plots using MolProbity⁵⁵.

Structural comparison

Proteins and ligands were superposed using the program LSQKAB⁵⁶. Coordinate files of the free form of mouse CRBN TBD²⁸ (PDB code: 3WX2) and the free form of thalidomide³³ (CCDC identifier: 1270378) were obtained from the Protein Data Bank (PDB) and the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD), respectively.

Antibodies

Anti-mouse monoclonal CRBN antibody was generated in house (epitope 1–18). Aside from this, primary antibodies against FLAG (M2. Sigma), HA (3F10, Roche), IKZF3 (ab139408, Abcam), and GAPDH (3H12, MBL) were used.

Thalidomide and related compounds

Racemic thalidomide was purchased from Tocris Biosciences. (S)- and (R)-thalidomides and their deuterated (D-thalidomide) enantiomers were synthesized as previously described^30,57. Enantiomeric purities were monitored by HPLC (DAICEL Chiralpak IA, 4.6 × 250 mm, MeOH = 100%, flow rate 1.0 ml/min, λ = 254 nm) and are summarized in Supplementary Table 1. Thalidomide and D-thalidomide enantiomers were dissolved in dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) at room temperature to generate a 100 mM stock solution. Similarly, glutarimide, phthalimide, glutaric anhydride, δ-valerolactam and cycloheximide (Sigma Aldrich) were each dissolved in DMSO.

In vivo binding assay using thalidomide-immobilized beads

Binding assays were performed essentially as previously described²⁵. Human CRBN proteins were overexpressed in 293 T cells by transfecting FLAG and haemagglutinin (HA) epitope–tagged (FH)- human CRBN constructs using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen). 293 T cells were maintained in DMEM (Nacalai Tesque) supplemented with 10% FBS. Cell extracts were incubated with thalidomide-immobilized beads, and bound material was eluted with buffer containing thalidomide, thalidomide-related compounds, or SDS. Lysates (input) and bead-affinity-purified (AP) materials were immunoblotted (IB). Recombinant FLAG-CRBN proteins were expressed in Sf9 cells using the Bac-to-Bac system (Invitrogen) and immunopurified using anti-FLAG antibody. Subsequent binding assays were performed as described above.

In vitro ubiquitylation assay

Auto-ubiquitylation of FH-CRBN was detected in the presence of the protease inhibitor MG132 as previously described²⁵. Cells stably expressing FH-CRBN were treated for 3 hours prior to harvesting with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (10 μM) or left untreated. Lysates were incubated with M2 anti-FLAG agarose beads. FH-CRBN was eluted with SDS and then subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using anti-HA antibody (3F10, Roche). When indicated, (S)- or (R)-thalidomide was added to cells 1 hour prior to MG132 addition.

Thalidomide treatment of zebrafish

Fish were kept at 28.5 °C on a 14-h light/10-h dark cycle, and embryos were obtained by natural matings of adult fish as previously described²⁵. Zebrafish embryos were dechorionated prior to thalidomide treatment as follows: At 2 hpf, embryos were incubated in E3 medium containing 2 mg/ml Protease type XIV (Sigma) for 3 min at room temperature and then washed five times with E3 medium. Following dechorionation, embryos were immediately transferred to E3 medium containing thalidomide and further incubated for 24 to 73 h at 28.5 °C. The E3 medium was replaced with medium containing freshly prepared thalidomide every 12 h. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) were maintained in accordance with the Animal Research Guidelines at Tokyo Institute of Technology and Tokyo Medical University. The experimental protocol was reviewed and approved by the Animal Research Committee and the method was carried out in accordance with the committee’s approved guidelines.

IKZF3 degradation assay

MM1S cells were treated with DMSO or deuterated-thalidomide enantiomers for 12 h.

Whole-cell extracts were prepared using RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% DOC, 0.1% SDS and 1% NP-40) and subjected to immunoblot analysis. MM1S cells were maintained in RPMI1640 (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS.

Co-immunoprecipitation assay

293 T cells stably expressing FLAG-HA-CRBN were transfected with HA-Aiolos expression vectors. After 48 hours, cells were collected and lysed using 0.5% NP-40 lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl and 0.5% NP-40. Extracts were incubated with M2 FLAG magnetic beads (Sigma) in the presence of (S)-D-thalidomide or (R)-D-thalidomide and incubated for 2 h. Following extensive washing three times with 0.5% NP-40 lysis buffer, bound proteins were eluted with free 3x FLAG-peptides (Sigma) and then subjected to immunoblot analysis.

Binding assay using calorimetry

Binding studies utilizing isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) were conducted using a calorimeter (MicroCal iTC₂₀₀, GE Healthcare) at 20 °C. Purified proteins were dialyzed overnight in buffer containing 10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 6.8), 150 mM NaCl and 0.5 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP). Given the poor solubility of the drugs, reverse titration was employed whereby CRBN TBD solution (1.2 mM) was injected (1.5 μl each, 5 min pause) into each drug solution (150 μM). Details of each titration are given in the figure legends of Supplementary Figs 2 and 5. Data fitting was performed using ORIGIN^TM software supplied with the instrument.

Accession code

Protein Data Bank: The atomic coordinates and structure factors for the reported crystal structures are deposited under accession codes 5YJ0 (the (S)-thalidomide-bound form of CRBN TBD), 5YJ1 (the (R)-thalidomide-bound form) and 5YIZ (the (S)-thalidomide-bound form prepared with racemic thalidomide).

References

Miller, M. T. & Strömland, K. Teratogen update: thalidomide: a review, with a focus on ocular findings and new potential uses. Teratology 60, 306–321 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Melchert, M. & List, A. The thalidomide saga. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 39, 1489–1499 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ito, T., Ando, H. & Handa, H. Teratogenic effects of thalidomide: molecular mechanisms. Cell Mol Life Sci 68, 1569–1579 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sheskin, J. Thalidomide in the treatment of lepra reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther 6, 303–306 (1965).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sampaio, E. P., Sarno, E. N., Galilly, R., Cohn, Z. A. & Kaplan, G. Thalidomide selectively inhibits tumour necrosis factor α production by stimulated human monocytes. J Exp Med 173, 699–703 (1991).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
D’Amato, R. J., Loughnan, M. S., Flynn, E. & Folkman, J. Thalidomide is an inhibitor of angiogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 91, 4082–4085 (1994).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Parman, T., Wiley, M. J. & Wells, P. G. Free radical-mediated oxidative DNA damage in the mechanism of thalidomide teratogenicity. Nat Med 5, 582–585 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hansen, J. M. & Harris, C. A novel hypothesis for thalidomide induced limb teratogenesis: redox misregulation of the NF-kappaB pathway. Antioxid Redox Signal 6, 1–14 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hansen, J. M., Gong, S. G., Philbert, M. & Harris, C. Misregulation of gene expression in the redox-sensitive NF-kappab-dependent limb outgrowth pathway by thalidomide. Dev Dyn 225, 186–194 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Knobloch, J., Shaughnessy, J. D. Jr & Ruther, U. Thalidomide induces limb deformities by perturbing the Bmp/Dkk1/Wnt signaling pathway. FASEB J 21, 1410–1421 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bartlett, J. B., Dredge, K. & Dalgleish, A. G. The evolution of thalidomide and its IMiD derivatives as anticancer agents. Nat Rev Cancer 4, 314–322 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Franks, M. E., Macpherson, G. R. & Figg, W. D. Thalidomide. Lancet 363, 1802–1811 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li., S., Gill, N. & Lentzsch, S. Recent advances of IMiDs in cancer therapy. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 22, 579–585 (2010).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Rajkumar, S. V. Treatment of multiple myeloma. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8, 479–491 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lebrin, F. et al. Thalidomide stimulates vessel maturation and reduces epistaxis in individuals with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Nat. Med. 16, 420–428 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Carmeliet, P. & Jain, R. K. Molecular mechanisms and clinical applications of angiogenesis. Nature 473, 298–307 (2011).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nishimura, K., Hashimoto, Y. & Iwasaki, S. (S)-form of alpha-methyl-N(alpha)-phthalimidoglutarimide, but not its (R)-form, enhanced phorbol ester-induced tumor necrosis factor-alpha production by human leukemia cell HL-60: implication of optical resolution of thalidomidal effects. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 42, 1157–1159 (1994).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Eriksson, T., Bjorkman, S., Roth, B., Fyge, A. & Hoglund, P. Stereospecific Determination, Chiral Inversion In Vitro and Pharmacokinetics in Humans of the Enantiomers of Thalidomide. Chirality 7, 44–52 (1995).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bjorkman, S., Eriksson, T., Roth, B., Fyge, A. & Hoglund, P. Enantiomers of thalidomide: Blood distribution and the influence of serum albumin on chiral inversion and hydrolysis. Chirality 10, 223–228 (1998).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Heger, W. et al. Embryotoxic effects of thalidomide derivatives in the non-human primate callithrix jacchus. IV. Teratogenicity of micrograms/kg doses of the EM12 enantiomers. Teratog. Carcinog. Mutagen. 14, 115–122 (1994).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Nishimura, K., Hashimoto, Y. & Iwasaki, S. (S)-form of α-methyl-N(α)-phthalimidoglutarimide, but not its (R)-form, enhanced phorbol ester-induced tumor necrosis factor-α production by human leukemia cell HL-60: implication of optical resolution of thalidomidal effects. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 42, 1157–1159 (1994).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wnendt, S. et al. Enantioselective inhibition of TNF-alpha release by thalidomide and thalidomide-analogues. Chirality 8, 390–396 (1996).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kenyon, B. M., Browne, F. & D’Amato, R. J. Effects of thalidomide and related metabolites in a mouse corneal model of neovascularization. Exp. Eye Res. 64, 971–978 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Teo, S. K. et al. Chiral inversion of the second generation IMiD (TM) CC-4047 (ACTIMID (TM)) in human plasma and phosphate-buffered saline. Chirality 15, 348–351 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ito, T. et al. Identification of a primary target of thalidomide teratogenicity. Science 327, 1345–1350 (2010).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Higgins, J. J., Pucilowska, J., Lombardi, R. Q. & Rooney, J. P. A mutation in a novel ATP-dependent Lon protease gene in a kindred with mild mental retardation. Neurology 63, 1927–1931 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhu, Y. X. et al. Cereblon expression is required for the anti-myeloma activity of lenalidomide and pomalidomide. Blood 118, 4771–4779 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chamberlain, P. P. et al. Structure of the human Cereblon-DDB1-lenalidomide complex reveals basis for responsiveness to thalidomide analogs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 21, 803–809 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fischer, E. S. et al. Structure of the DDB1-CRBN E3 ubiquitin ligase in complex with thalidomide. Nature 512, 49–53 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yamamoto, T. et al. Synthesis and configurational stability of (S)- and (R)-deuteriothalidomides. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 58, 110–112 (2010).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Krönke, J. et al. Lenalidomide causes selective degradation of IKZF1 and IKZF3 in multiple myeloma cells. Science 343, 301–305 (2014).
Article ADS PubMed Google Scholar
Lu, G. et al. The myeloma drug lenalidomide promotes the cereblon-dependent destruction of Ikaros proteins. Science 343, 305–309 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Allen, F. H. & Trotter, J. Crystal and molecular structure of thalidomide, N-(α-glutarimido)-phthalimide. J. Chem. Soc. B, 1073–1079 (1971).
Reepmeyer, J. C., Rhodes, M. O., Coxa, D. C. & Silverton, J. C. Characterization and Crystal Structure of Two Polymorphic Forms of Racemic Thalidomide. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 2, 2063–2067 (1994).
Article Google Scholar
Krönke, J. et al. Lenalidomide induces ubiquitination and degradation of CK1α in del(5q) MDS. Nature 523, 183–188 (2015).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tan, X. et al. Mechanism of auxin perception by the TIR1 ubiquitin ligase. Nature 446, 640–645 (2007).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pommier, Y. & Cherfils, J. Interfacial inhibition of macromolecular interactions: nature’s paradigm for drug discovery. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 26, 138–145 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Petzold, G., Fischer, E. S. & Thomä, N. H. Structural basis of lenalidomide-induced CK1α degradation by the CRL4(CRBN) ubiquitin ligase. Nature 532, 127–130 (2016).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chen, T. L. et al. Plasma pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion of thalidomide after oral dosing in healthy male volunteers. Drug Metab. Dispos. 17, 402–405 (1989).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chung, F. et al. Thalidomide pharmacokinetics and metabolite formation in mice, rabbits, and multiple myeloma patients. Clin. Cancer Res. 10, 5949–5956 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bauer, K. S., Dixon, S. C. & Figg, W. D. Inhibition of angiogenesis by thalidomide requires metabolic activation, which is species-dependent. Biochem. Pharmacol. 55, 1827–1834 (1998).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schmahl, H. J., Nau, H. & Neubert, D. The enantiomers of the teratogenic thalidomide analogue EM 12: 1. Chiral inversion and plasma pharmacokinetics in the marmoset monkey. Arch. Toxicol. 62, 200–204 (1988).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Winckler, K., Klinkmuller, K. D. & Schmahl, H. J. Determination of the thalidomide analogues 2-(2,6-dioxopiperidine-3-yl)phthalimidine (EM 12), 2-(2,6-dioxopiperidine-4-yl)phthalimidine (EM 16) and their metabolites in biological samples. J. Chromatogr. 488, 417–425 (1989).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Czejka, M. J. & Koch, H. P. Determination of thalidomide and its major metabolites by high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 413, 181–187 (1987).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Fabro, S., Schumacher, H., Smith, R. L., Stagg, R. B. & Williams, R. T. The metabolism of thalidomide: some biological effects of thalidomide and its metabolites. Br. J. Pharmacol. Chemother. 25, 352–362 (1965).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Günzler, V., Hanauske-Abel, H. M., Tschank, G. & Schulte-Wissermann, H. Immunological effects of thalidomide. Inactivity of the drug and several of its hydrolysis products in mononucleocyte proliferation tests. Arzneimittelforschung 36, 1138–1141 (1986).
PubMed Google Scholar
Jönsson, N. A. Chemical structure and teratogenic properties. 3. A review of available data on structure-activity relationships and mechanism of action of thalidomide analogues. Acta Pharm. Suec. 9, 521–542 (1972).
PubMed Google Scholar
Sreenath, H. K. et al. Protocols for production of selenomethionine-labeled proteins in 2-L polyethylene terephthalate bottles using auto-induction medium. Protein Expr. Purif. 40, 256–267 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276(A), 307–326 (1997).
Article CAS Google Scholar
Emsley, P. & Cowtan, K. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 60, 2126–2132 (2004).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Brünger, A. T. et al. Crystallography & NMR system: a new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D 54, 905–921 (1998).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Murshudov, G. N., Vagin, A. A. & Dodson, E. J. Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. Acta Crystallogr. D 53, 240–255 (1997).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Schüttelkopf, A. W. & van Aalten, D. M. PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Crystallogr D 60, 1355–1363 (2004).
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kabsch, W. & Sander, C. Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22, 2577–2637 (1983).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Davis, I. W. et al. MolProbity: all-atom contacts and structure validation for proteins and nucleic acids. Nucle. Acids Res. 35(Web Server issue), W375–W383 (2007).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Kabsch, W. A solution for the best rotation to relate two sets of vectors. Acta Crystallogr A 32, 922–923 (1978).
Article ADS Google Scholar
Suzuki, E. & Shibata, N. Three-step synthesis of (R)- and (S)-thalidomides from ornithine. Enantiomer 6, 275–279 (2001).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank R. Kurata and Y. Tawara for technical support in performing the MALDI TOF mass spectroscopy analysis. The synchrotron radiation experiments were performed at the BL32XU, BL41XU and BL44XU of SPring-8 with the approval of the Japan Synchrotron Radiation Research Institute (JASRI); Proposal No. 2012A(1058, 6738), 2012B(1205, 6738), 2013A6844, 2013B(1288, 6844), 2014A(1283, 6944), 2014B(6944, 1533), 2015A(1086, 6549), 2015B(2086, 6549), 2016A(2510, 2519, 6648), 2016B(2510, 2519, 6648), 2017A(2502, 6759) and 2017B6759. We also thank Dr I. Ooki for help with the data collection at SPring-8. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Area “Structural Cell Biology” from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan and in part by a research grant from the Uehara Memorial Foundation, Japan (to T.H.), and also supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Innovative Areas “Chemical Biology of Natural Products” from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) (23102002 to H.H.), by PRESTO, JST (JPMJPR1531 to T.I.) and by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (S) (17H06112 to H.H.) and (B) (17H04213 to T.I.) and Young Scientists (B) (26750374 to T.I.) from MEXT.

Author information

Tomoyuki Mori and Takumi Ito contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

Structural Biology Laboratory, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan
Tomoyuki Mori & Toshio Hakoshima
Department of Nanoparticle Translational Research, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, 160-8402, Japan
Takumi Ito, Hideki Ando & Hiroshi Handa
PRESTO, JST, 4-1-8, Honcho, Kawaguchi, Saitama, 332-0012, Japan
Takumi Ito
School of Life Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, 226-8501, Japan
Shujie Liu, Satoshi Sakamoto & Yuki Yamaguchi
Department of Nanopharmaceutical Sciences, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso, Showa-ku, Nagoya, 466-8555, Japan
Etsuko Tokunaga & Norio Shibata

Authors

Tomoyuki Mori
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Takumi Ito
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Shujie Liu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hideki Ando
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Satoshi Sakamoto
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Yuki Yamaguchi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Etsuko Tokunaga
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Norio Shibata
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Hiroshi Handa
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Toshio Hakoshima
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

T.H. and H.H. conceived the project. H.H. provided all cDNAs. T.H. designed the project and was responsible for construct design for protein preparation. T.M. executed protein biochemistry, C.D. measurements, A.U.C. experiments, crystallization and data collection, and solved and refined the structures, directed by T.H. T.I. and S.S. synthesized thalidomide-immobilized beads. T.I. performed binding studies and ubiquitylation assays. T.I., S.L., and H.A. performed zebrafish experiments. N.S. and E.T. synthesized and analyzed deuterated thalidomides. T.M., T.I., Y.Y., H.H. and T.H. interpreted the data and T.H., T.I., Y.Y. and H.H. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hiroshi Handa or Toshio Hakoshima.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary figures

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mori, T., Ito, T., Liu, S. et al. Structural basis of thalidomide enantiomer binding to cereblon. Sci Rep 8, 1294 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19202-7

Download citation

Received: 28 March 2017
Accepted: 22 December 2017
Published: 22 January 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19202-7

This article is cited by

Discovery of a dual WDR5 and Ikaros PROTAC degrader as an anti-cancer therapeutic
- Dongxu Li
- Xufen Yu
- Gang Greg Wang
Oncogene (2022)
Application of high-performance magnetic nanobeads to biological sensing devices
- Yasuaki Kabe
- Satoshi Sakamoto
- Hiroshi Handa
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry (2019)
Understanding the Thalidomide Chirality in Biological Processes by the Self-disproportionation of Enantiomers
- Etsuko Tokunaga
- Takeshi Yamamoto
- Norio Shibata
Scientific Reports (2018)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.