Abstract
For the first time, deformation twinning and martensitic transformation were observed in retained austenite in a low-alloyed transformation-induced plasticity steel using nanoindentation in conjunction with electron backscattering diffraction and transmission electron microscopy. Dislocation glide, martensite formation and deformation twinning were correlated to pop-ins and deviation from linearity in the load-displacement curve. Deformation twinning was found to enhance the stability of retained austenite. This observation furthers our understanding of RA stability during straining of low-alloyed multiphase TRIP steel.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Low-alloyed transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP) steel consists of polygonal ferrite, bainitic ferrite, granular bainite, retained austenite (RA) and a possible small fraction of martensite1,2,3. It combines high strength and good formability due to the transformation of RA to martensite upon straining (TRIP effect)3,4. Therefore, the stability of RA during deformation plays an important role in the mechanical behaviour, which has been extensively investigated5,6,7,8,9,10. The RA stability is dictated by many factors, among which are the grain size6,10, carbon content7, morphology8 and neighbouring phases9. Many advanced techniques have been applied to investigate the RA behaviour during straining, such as nanoindentation11,12, synchrotron10,13 or neutron14 diffraction and step-wise tensile testing correlated with electron backscattering diffraction (EBSD)6. It was demonstrated that gradual transformation of RA to martensite during straining results in the best combination of mechanical properties5. While deformation twinning has been rarely observed along with martensitic transformation in low-alloyed TRIP steels15,16, the present study reports on their concurrent formation and the effect of deformation twinning on RA stability, by correlating nanoindentation with EBSD and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). In addition, dislocation glide, deformation twinning and martensite transformation were linked to the corresponding features in the load-displacement curve, in the form of pop-ins and deviation from linearity.
Material and Methods
A Fe-0.172 C-1.520 Si-1.610 Mn-0.0266 Al-0.0153 Cu-0.195 Cr (all compositions are given in wt. %) low-alloyed TRIP steel was produced using laboratory simulated strip casting2. The microstructure consisted of 55 ± 6% polygonal ferrite, 4.5 ± 0.3% RA (with an average carbon content of 1.23 ± 0.01 wt. %; measured by X-ray diffraction), and a mixture of carbide-free bainitic ferrite and granular bainite with some traces of martensite2.The sample for EBSD mapping and nanoindentation was mechanically polished and then electro-polished using an electrolyte of 330 ml methanol, 330 ml butoxyethanol and 40 ml perchloric acid at 50 V, ~ 1.0 mA and 17 °C for ~ 90 s. EBSD was undertaken using a JEOL JSM-7001F field emission gun – scanning electron microscope operating at an accelerating voltage of 15 kV, a probe current of ~5.1 nA, a working distance of 12 mm and a step size of 0.04 μm. The EBSD map in Fig. 1 was used for phase identification prior to nanoindentation. The ultra-microindentation system (UMIS) with a Berkovich diamond indenter was employed for nanoindentation. The peak load was chosen as 2 mN in order to study the deformation behaviour of RA as its stability in our steel is relatively high due to its high carbon content2,7. The load control was set to square root mode, including a gradual increase to the maximum value of 2 mN followed by unloading. Load and displacement data were recorded with a resolution of 75 nN and 0.05 nm, respectively. It is noted that the effect of grain boundaries and neighbouring phase on nanoindentation cannot be avoided in the present study due to the small RA grain size17. Following nanoindentation, a focused ion beam instrument (FEI Helios NanoLab G3 CX dual-beam) was used to cut lamellae from indented areas corresponding to the white square and circle in Fig. 1. The microstructure under the indentations was characterised using a JEOL JEM-ARM200F TEM operating at 200 kV.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Results and Discussion
Figure 2 shows the load-displacement curve of the RA indicated by the white square in Fig. 1. The pop-in like behaviour around 0.2 mN resulted from the initial contact of Berkovich diamond indenter with sample surface. The corresponding Hertzian elastic contact solution is as follows:18
where P is the applied load, h is the corresponding depth of indentation, R i is the radius of the indenter tip (160 nm in present study) and E r is the effective Young’s modulus of indentation. For an isotropic elastic material, the effective indentation modulus E r is given as:
where E is the Young’s modulus, v is the Poisson’s ratio, and the subscripts i and s represent the indenter and sample, respectively. For the indenter, E i = 1141 GPa and v i = 0.0719, whereas for austenite, E s = 187 GPa and v s = 0.320. The Hertzian elastic solution was calculated following Eqs (1,2) and shown in Fig. 2. The load-displacement curve deviates from the Hertzian elastic solution at the first pop-in, which indicates the transition from elastic to plastic deformation. In the elastic regime, the maximum shear stress (τ m ) is calculated as18:
The initiation load of the first pop-in (0.48 mN) leads to a maximum shear stress of 16.0 GPa. This value is ~20% of the austenite shear modulus (76.8 GPa) at room temperature21, which is within the expected range for the theoretical yield strength of a crystalline material22. Thus, the first pop-in is likely due to the initiation of dislocation glide11,12,19,23,24,25.
Figure 3 shows the corresponding microstructures of the cross-section under the indent (Figs 1 (white square) and 2). As seen, the blocky RA in granular bainite partially twinned (upper-left selected area diffraction (SAD) in Fig. 3(a)) and partially transformed to martensite (lower-left SAD in Fig. 3(a) and fast Fourier transform in Fig. 3(d)). The SAD (lower-left inset) in Fig. 3(a) indicates Kurdjumov-Sachs (K-S) orientation relationship (OR) ({110}bcc//{111}fcc, 〈111〉bcc//〈101〉fcc) between the RA and martensite located far away from the indentation. On the other hand, Nishiyama-Wassermann (N-W) OR ({110}bcc//{111}fcc, 〈001〉bcc//〈101〉fcc) was observed between the RA (SADs in Fig. 3(a)) and martensite located just below the indentation (Figs 3(b, d)); in the more plastically deformed region. Both of these ORs were reported for TRIP steels26. In the present steel, only K-S OR was detected in previous studies2,7. The N-W OR observed here adjacent to the indentation may be due to the high local strain, leading to rotation from the K-S to N-W OR, as they only deviate from each other by 5.26°26.
As suggested in refs11,12, the second pop-in in the load-displacement curve (at a load of ~ 1.3 mN in Fig. 2) can be ascribed to martensite transformation. This is likely due to the volume expansion (~ 3% in iron-carbon alloys27) associated with the rapid diffusionless martensitic transformation process11. Here the observation of martensite under the indentation (Fig. 3) further supports the link between the second pop-in and martensite formation.
Of greater interest here is the non-linear part in the load-displacement curve (Fig. 2), as it has been seldom reported before. Based on the observed microstructures (Fig. 3), it is likely due to deformation twinning in RA. On one hand, contrary to martensitic transformation, deformation twinning in face-centred cubic (fcc) crystals is not associated with volume change28, and is a continuous process, not spontaneous like martensitic transformation. Thus, twinning is not expected to directly result in a pop-in. On the other hand, deformation twinning is associated with stress relaxation28, which in turn can lead to the observed deviation from linearity in Fig. 2.
Figure 4(a) shows the load-displacement curve of the RA indicated by the white circle in Fig. 1. This area provides an example of deformation twinning in film RA between bainitic ferrite laths (Fig. 4(b,c)) characterised using annular bright field STEM imaging (Fig. 4(d,e)) together with fast Fourier transform (Fig. 4(f)). K-S OR between film RA and bainitic ferrite lath is shown via the SAD inset in Fig. 4(b). Compared to blocky RA in granular bainite (Fig. 3), no martensite was observed in this area, and accordingly the load-displacement curve (Fig. 4(a)) did not show the second pop-in associated with martensite transformation. Additionally, the non-linear part seen in Fig. 2 was not observed in Fig. 4(a); probably due to the formation of fewer deformation twins in this film RA. It is reiterated that the effect of the neighbouring bainitic ferrite laths on the load-displacement curve is unavoidable here due to the large applied load (2 mN) and the nano-sized film RA.
While deformation twinning typically occurs in low stacking fault energy austenitic steels, such as high manganese steels29, it has been rarely observed in RA in low-alloyed TRIP steel. Sugimoto et al.15. and Timokhina et al.16. reported deformation twinning in blocky RA after tensile loading of Fe-0.4C-1.5Si-1.5Mn-0.036Al (10% strain) and Fe-0.12C-1.77Si-1.39Mn-0.031Al-0.02Cr-0.005Cu (5% strain) TRIP steels, respectively. The present steel has similar chemical composition to refs15,16 and the observed deformation twining is probably due to the relatively high carbon content in RA (~ 6.0 at. %, as measured by atom probe tomography7) which significantly increases the stability of RA against martensitic transformation10.
The deformation twins divided the RA grains into sub-grains (Fig. 4(d)), then each sub-grain developed its deformation substructure by dislocation glide. Consequently, higher strain was required to initiate martensitic transformation and the overall RA stability was enhanced. When the strain is sufficient, the RA sub-grains would sequentially transform to martensite one by one if their volume is sufficiently large to initiate martensite nucleation (a minimum (sub)grain size of 0.7 µm was reported in ref.5). This behaviour was demonstrated by partial transformation of blocky RA to martensite (Fig. 3). The stepwise transformation manner may also contribute to the latter portion of the non-linear stage in the load-displacement curve (Fig. 2) as the small volume expansion associated with limited martensite formation would not be sufficient to result in a pop-in.
To verify the effect of twinning on RA stability, nine indents on blocky RA, which exhibited the second pop-in (indicating martensite transformation) but not the deviation from linearity (indicating no or very limited twinning), were used to estimate the onset load of martensite transformation and returned an average value of 0.93 ± 0.21 mN. However, when many twins were observed in blocky RA (Fig. 3), the onset load for martensite transformation was relatively larger (~1.3 mN in Fig. 2). These results underscore the enhancement of the overall RA stability by deformation twinning.
Conclusion
Nanoindentation and correlative TEM observations of blocky and film RA grains indicate that the plastic deformation of RA occurs in the sequence of dislocation glide, twinning and martensitic transformation. When all these mechanisms are operative, they correspond to the first pop-in, non-linear part and second pop-in in the load-displacement curve, respectively. Deformation twinning enhanced the overall stability of RA via the division of RA grain into sub-grains. Lastly, the absence of martensitic transformation in film RA further supports its higher stability compared to the blocky RA.
References
De Cooman, B. Structure–properties relationship in TRIP steels containing carbide-free bainite. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 8, 285–303 (2004).
Xiong, Z. P., Kostryzhev, A. G., Saleh, A. A., Chen, L. & Pereloma, E. V. Microstructures and mechanical properties of TRIP steel produced by strip casting simulated in the laboratory. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 664, 26–42 (2016).
Mark, A., Wang, X., Essadiqi, E., Embury, J. & Boyd, J. Development and characterisation of model TRIP steel microstructures. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 576, 108–117 (2013).
Hanzaki, A. Z., Hodgson, P. D. & Yue, S. Retained austenite characteristics in thermomechanically processed Si-Mn transformation-induced plasticity steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 28, 2405–2414 (1997).
Pereloma, E. V., Gazder, A. A. & Timokhina, I. B. Encyclopedia of Iron, Steel, and their Alloys (eds.Totten, G. E. & Colás, R.) 3088–3103 (CRC Press, 2015).
Park, H. S., Han, J. C., Lim, N. S., Seol, J. B. & Park, C. G. Nano-scale observation on the transformation behavior and mechanical stability of individual retained austenite in CMnSiAl TRIP steels. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 627, 262–269 (2015).
Xiong, Z. P. et al. Site-specific atomic-scale characterisation of retained austenite in a strip cast TRIP steel. Acta Mater. 134, 1–15 (2017).
Caballero, F. G. et al. Effects of morphology and stability of retained austenite on the ductility of TRIP-aided bainitic steels. ISIJ Int. 48, 1256–1262 (2008).
Pereloma, E. V., Gazder, A. A. & Timokhina, I. B. Addressing retained austenite stability in advanced high strength steels. Mater. Sci. Forum 738, 212–216 (2013).
Jimenez-Melero, E. et al. Characterization of individual retained austenite grains and their stability in low-alloyed TRIP steels. Acta Mater. 55, 6713–6723 (2007).
Ahn, T. H. et al. Investigation of strain-induced martensitic transformation in metastable austenite using nanoindentation. Scripta Mater. 63, 540–543 (2010).
He, B. et al. Nanoindentation investigation on the mechanical stability of individual austenite grains in a medium-Mn transformation-induced plasticity steel. Scripta Mater. 69, 215–218 (2013).
Yan, K., Liss, K. D., Timokhina, I. B. & Pereloma, E. V. In situ synchrotron X-ray diffraction studies of the effect of microstructure on tensile behavior and retained austenite stability of thermo-mechanically processed transformation induced plasticity steel. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 662, 185–197 (2016).
Tomota, Y. et al. Tensile behavior of TRIP-aided multi-phase steels studied by in situ neutron diffraction. Acta Mater. 52, 5737–5745 (2004).
Sugimoto, K. I., Kobayashi, M. & Hashimoto, S. I. Ductility and strain-induced transformation in a high-strength transformation-induced plasticity-aided dual-phase steel. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 23, 3085–3091 (1992).
Timokhina, I. B., Hodgson, P. D. & Pereloma, E. V. Transmission electron microscopy characterization of the bake-hardening behavior of transformation-induced plasticity and dual-phase steels. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 38, 2442–2454 (2007).
Zhang, J. l., Zaefferer, S. & Raabe, D. A study on the geometry of dislocation patterns in the surrounding of nanoindents in a TWIP steel using electron channeling contrast imaging and discrete dislocation dynamics simulations. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 636, 231–242 (2015).
Johnson, K. L. Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 1985).
Shim, S., Bei, H., George, E. P. & Pharr, G. M. A different type of indentation size effect. Scripta Mater. 59, 1095–1098 (2008).
Lani, F. et al. Multiscale mechanics of TRIP-assisted multiphase steels: II. Micromechanical modelling. Acta Mater. 55, 3695–3705 (2007).
Oila, A. & Bull, S. Atomistic simulation of Fe–C austenite. Comput. Mater. Sci. 45, 235–239 (2009).
Honeycombe, R. W. K. Plastic Deformation of Metals, second ed. (Edward Arnold, 1984).
Sekido,K. et al. Nanoindentation/atomic force microscopy analyses of ε-martensitic transformation and shape memory effect in Fe–28Mn–6Si–5Cr alloy. Scripta Mater. 65, 942-945 (2011).
Bahr, D. F., Kramer, D. & Gerberich, W. Non-linear deformation mechanisms during nanoindentation. Acta Mater. 46, 3605–3617 (1998).
Corcoran, S., Colton, R., Lilleodden, E. & Gerberich, W. Anomalous plastic deformation at surfaces: Nanoindentation of gold single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 55, R16057–R16060 (1997).
Verbeken, K., Barbé, L. & Raabe, D. Evaluation of the crystallographic orientation relationships between FCC and BCC phases in TRIP steels. ISIJ Int. 49, 1601–1609 (2009).
Moyer, J. & Ansell, G. The volume expansion accompanying the martensite transformation in iron-carbon alloys. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 6, 1785–1791 (1975).
Niewczas, M. Dislocations in Solids (eds Nabarro, F. R. N. & Hirth, J. P.) 263–364 (Elsevier B. V., 2007).
Grässel, O., Krüger, L., Frommeyer, G. & Meyer, L. High strength Fe–Mn–(Al, Si) TRIP/TWIP steels development—properties—application. Inter. J. Plast. 16, 1391–1409 (2000).
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by the Australian Research Council (DP130101887). The FEI Helios NanoLab G3 CX, JEOL JSM-7001F FEG-SEM and JEOL JEM-ARM200F were funded by the Australian Research Council (LE160100063, LE0882613 and LE120100104, respectively). The authors thank Dr. Hongtao Zhu, University of Wollongong, for the access to the ultra-microindentation system.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.V.P. conceived this article. Z.X. took part in all experiments, analysed all the data and prepared the manuscript. G.C., A.A.S., S.C. carried out materials characterisation using transmission electron microscopy, electron backscattering diffraction and nanoindentation, respectively. A.A.S., E.V.P. and G.C. contributed to paper writing. All the authors checked the manuscript text.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xiong, Z., Casillas, G., Saleh, A.A. et al. Observation of deformation twinning and martensitic transformation during nanoindentation of a transformation-induced plasticity steel. Sci Rep 7, 17397 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17824-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17824-x
This article is cited by
-
Effects of microstructure and texture after thermomechanical treatments on corrosion behavior of AISI 321 pipeline austenitic stainless steel
Journal of Central South University (2022)
-
An EBSD Study on the Stability of Retained Austenite in Low-Si TRIP Steels During Uniaxial Tension
JOM (2021)
-
Phase-specific properties in a low-alloyed TRIP steel investigated using correlative nanoindentation measurements and electron microscopy
Journal of Materials Science (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.