Article | Open

Fluorescence brightness and photostability of individual copper (I) oxide nanocubes

  • Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 16905 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-17295-0
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Conventional organic fluorophores lose their ability to fluoresce after repeated exposure to excitation light due to photobleaching. Therefore, research into emerging bright and photostable nanomaterials has become of great interest for a range of applications such as bio-imaging and tracking. Among these emerging fluorophores, metal oxide-based nanomaterials have attracted significant attention as a potential multifunctional material with photocatalytic and angeogenisis abilities in addition to fluorescnce applications. However, most of these applications are highly dependent on size, morphology, and chemo-physical properties of individual particles. In this manuscript, we present a method to study the intrinsic optical characteristics of individual copper (I) oxide (Cu2O) nanocubes. When excited at 520 nm using only 11 µW excitation power (1.7 W/cm2), individual nanocubes were observed to emit light with peak wavelengths ~760 nm which is conveniently within the near-infrared 1 (NIR1) biological window where tissue autofluorescence is minimal. Bright and photostable fluorescence was observed with intensities up to 487 K counts/s under constant illumination for at least 2 minutes with a brightness approximately four times higher than the autofluorescence from a fixed cumulus-oocyte complex. With near-IR emission, high fluorescence brightness, and outstanding photostability, Cu2O nanocubes are attractive candidates for long-term fluorescent bioimaging applications.

Introduction

Copper (I) oxide (Cu2O) is a p-type semiconductor material with a direct bandgap 2.17 eV in bulk form1,2,3,4,5. This semiconducting material has attracted much attention due to its exceptional properties which are possible in nano-sized particles. Various morphologies are possible such as nanocubes, nanospheres, nanorods and nanooctahedrons, as reported in the literature, synthesised via simple methods and low preparation costs1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12. These approaches make this material suitable for scalable manufacturing and provide a competitive edge as an oxide semiconducting material. Copper (I) oxide shows a high absorption coefficient at around 438 nm in bulk and ensembles, has more than 10% energy conversion efficiency and a quantum yield of 6.6 × 10−2% when excited at 360 nm and emission at 493 nm13 which makes this material a promising candidate for various photoelectronic applications, such as photovoltaic cells and photo-capacitors13,14. Other areas of interest which explore the use of Cu2O nanoparticles are in the fields of biological imaging15 and photocatalysis3,16. As an example, Qi et al. have used Cu2O nanoparticles for light scattering imaging of living cells and as a probe for conformation of proteins15, where they report changes in circular dichroism of specific proteins such as prion (PrPC) and bovine serum albumin (BSA) due to the introduction of Cu2O nanoparticles. It has been shown that the optical and electrical properties of Cu2O semiconductors are highly dependent on their morphology and the growth of the crystal facets of Cu2O nanoparticles12,17. Among the various morphologies of nano- copper (I) oxides, nanocubic morphologies have attracted great attention due to their well-defined cubic structure and shape homogeneity. Ensembles of Cu2O nanoparticles have also been shown to have an intraband photoemission due to oxygen vacancies which give rise to 750 nm emission with 532 nm excitation18. The emission at 750 nm makes this nanoparticle a good candidate for bioimaging applications as the emission lies within the NIR1 biological window19. However, up until now, the optical fluorescent properties of individual, isolated Cu2O nanoparticles have not been studied.

The emerging area of biophotonics requires the development of intrinsically bright and photostable luminescent nanoprobes. Our approach in this paper is to explore the optical properties of individual and isolated cubic Cu2O nanoparticles, which are monodisperse in size. Previous characterisation and analytical studies that have been reported in the literature for Cu2O nanoparticles have focused on ensemble colloid solutions or bulk materials that are widely dispersed in size and morphology, resulting in cumulative measurements20,21. Collecting bright and stable emission from fluorescent organic dyes or nanoparticles using low laser excitation is essential when these fluorophores are used for biological imaging. Biological samples are sophisticated and highly responsive to laser irradiation as high laser power coagulates proteins of tissues, thus it can destroy a sample22. Hence, it is desirable for a fluorescent nanoparticle to exhibit bright emission, above that of any surrounding background fluorescence, with minimal optical excitation. In this research, we have examined individual Cu2O nanocubes using silicon wafers which have been milled using a focused ion beam to create registration markers23. The marked substrates are visible in both a confocal microscope and scanning electron microscope (SEM) and enable the characterisation of isolated nanocubes without interaction from adjacent particles. We now present the first study of the optical fluorescent properties of individual Cu2O nanocubes, compare their performance against existing commercially available fluorescent materials, focusing on the intrinsic brightness and photostability of the material for bioimaging applications.

Experimental

Chemicals for Cu2O synthesis

Copper (II) sulphate (CuSO4), Sodium dodecyl sulphate (C12H25NaO4S), (+)-Sodium L- ascorbate (C6H7NaO6) and Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) were used in the synthesis of Cu2O nanocubes. All chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich and used as received. The water used was double distilled de-ionized Milli-Q water 18.2 MΩ.cm.

Chemicals used for cumulus-oocyte complex preparation

αMEM supplemented with bovine serum albumin (BSA; ICPbio, Glenfield, New Zealand), Recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone (50 mIU/ml; Organon, Oss, The Netherlands), equine chorionic gonadotropin (eCG; Folligon, Intervet, Boxmeer, The Netherlands).

Cu2O nanoparticle synthesis

A seed-mediated growth method1 was used to synthesise Cu2O nanocubes which were tailored to increase the yield of Cu2O nanocubes compared to the in the published synthesis process. A solution containing 1 mM of CuSO4 and 33 mM Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) was prepared and 30 ml of the prepared mixture was transferred to a round bottle flask (bottle A) followed by the addition of 750 µL of 0.2 M (+)-Sodium L-ascorbate. The solution was vigorously shaken for 5 seconds followed by the addition of 1 M NaOH and shaken another 5 seconds. Then, 20 mL of solution from bottle A was transferred to another round bottle flask (bottle B) with 180 ml of the starting solution and kept in constant shaking for 10 seconds. Then, 5 mL of 0.2 M (+)-Sodium L- ascorbate was added to bottle B and shaken for 5 seconds. Afterwards, 10 mL of 1 M NaOH was added to bottle B and then shaken for another 5 seconds. Sample B was kept standing for one hour. The synthesised Cu2O nanocubes were centrifuged at 5000 rpm and washed three times for ten minutes each and redispersed in 10 ml ethanol

Characterization

The morphological studies of synthesised Cu2O nanocubes were carried out with FEI Verios 460 L scanning electron microscope using 10 kV and 0.8 nA. The structural characteristics of the synthesised materials were studied using Bruker D8 Discover microdiffraction system which has general area detector diffraction system and the Cu-Kα radiation source. The oxidation state studies of the prepared samples were studied using Thermo K-Alpha instrument at a pressure better than ~10–8 Torr. The core binding energies of the elements were aligned at 285 eV for adventitious C1s core level energy. Si substrates were marked using focused ion beam milling with a FEI Scios FIB-SEM. Each marked area on the silicon has a size of 286 µm × 286 µm with an etched depth of 1 μm. A beam current 3 nA at 30 KV was used for 516 seconds with tilt 52° to mill each substrate. Fluorescence confocal images were taken using a 6 ps pulsed Fianium SuperChrome laser source, at a repetition rate of 40 MHz, with a centre wavelength of 520 nm and a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of 10 nm. The imaging was performed using a 532 nm dichroic mirror, 532 nm long pass filter, 532 nm short pass filter and a 100 × 0.9 NA objective lens.

Tracking individual particles

Individual Cu2O nanocubes were studied using a marked silicon substrate23 which was milled with focused ion beam (FIB). The marked Si substrate was drop cast with one drop of the sample. A low magnification SEM image of the deposited, marked substrate was taken to locate regions of isolated particles. Afterwards, the individual particles have been numbered (P1 to P19) and then optical data have been collected the marked individual and isolated Cu2O particles.

Cumulus-oocyte complex (COC) sample preparation

All animal work was approved by the University of Adelaide Animal Ethics Committee. Female mice were administered 5 IU equine chorionic gonadotropin (i.p.) (eCG; Folligon, Intervet, Boxmeer, The Netherlands). 46 hours post-eCG injection, ovaries were collected and COCs liberated from antral follicles. COCs were then placed in maturation medium and matured for 16 hours in a volume of 50 μl medium/COC at 37 °C under paraffin oil, in humidified air comprised of 20% O2, 6% CO2 and N2 balance. Following maturation, COCs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and mounted on glass slides using DAKO Fluorescence Mounting Medium (Dako, NSW, Australia). Cu2O nanocubes were transferred to water and were drop cast on the biological sample to study the intensity variation between fixed biological sample and Cu2O nanocubes.

Results and Discussion

Cu2O nanocubes were synthesised using a previously reported seed-mediated approach1,3. In this synthesis method, sodium ascorbate acts as a reducing agent, sodium dodecyl sulphate as a capping agent, and sodium hydroxide was used to form Cu(OH)42−, which was then reduced to produce Cu2O seeds. These seeds produce cubic Cu2O nanoparticles after Ostwald ripening and surface reconstruction1. SEM images confirmed the truncated cubic shape and smooth surfaces of the particles (Fig. 1a). The average lengths of cubic Cu2O are 293 ± 18 nm along one side (Fig. 1b). The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) pattern of the sample shows the formation of the face-centered cubic lattice Cu2O (JCPDF No. 78–2076) (Fig. 1c). To further confirm the formation of Cu2O, oxidation state analysis was carried out using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. The low-resolution XPS survey spectrum (Figure S1) showed the presence of C1s, O1s, Cu2p, and Na1s peak, where C1s is related to the surface adsorbed adventitious carbon while the Na is related to the trace chemicals remaining from the starting materials. It showed that the core level of the Cu 2p3/2 has 932.5 eV and Cu 2p3/2 has 952.4 eV binding energy indicating the oxidation state of Cu(I) (Fig. 1d). Satellite peaks in CuO structures have higher intensities than Cu2O structures. Also, the position of these satellite peaks is different in these two oxidation states. The satellite peaks appearing at 943.8 eV and 946.3 eV are related to Cu(I) while the presence of the peaks at 944.3 eV and 963.1 eV relate to the existence of trace CuO impurities17. The XRD and XPS results indicate that the synthesised cubic structures are predominantly Cu2O structures3. Other than the XRD and XPS analysis, the zeta potential of the particles was also measured yielding −17.4 ± 4.7 mV. The zeta potential information is valuable for future functionalizing of the nanocubes with additional materials for targeted biological imaging applications. This result also means that these Cu2O nanocubes can increase the surface adsorption ability between nanocubes and charged molecules for biolabelling applications24.

Figure 1
Figure 1

(a) SEM image of Cu2O nanocubes showing cubic morphology with an individual isolated nanocube shown in the inset. (b) Size distribution of each of the Cu2O nanocubes analysed with a peak side length of 293 ± 18 nm. (c) XRD pattern of Cu2O nanocubes where (111) crystal facet has the highest intensity. (d) XPS Cu2p scan showing Cu 2p 3/2 peak at 932.5 eV and Cu 2p ½ peak at 952.4 eV with satellite peaks at 943.8 eV and 946.3 eV representing the formation of Cu2O with small amounts of the CuO impurities based on the satellite peaks at 944.3 eV and 963.1 eV.

A template registration marker, shown in Fig 2a-1 was milled into a silicon substrate with a focused ion beam to enable the characterization of isolated Cu2O nanocubes. This was followed by drop casting the synthesised nanocubes and drying under air (Fig. 2a-2). A low magnification scanning electron microscope (SEM) image was taken to locate regions of individual and isolated Cu2O nanocubes (Figure 2a-2)23. The marked silicon platform was used to locate and measure the optical properties of individual particles under a confocal microscope. To confirm the size, morphology, and isolation of particles, high-magnification SEM images were taken after all optical data was acquired from 19 individual nanocubes in order to minimise any effect of possible electron beam damage on their optical properties. Figure 2a-1 represents the template of the registration pattern which has been milled as shown in Fig. 2b-1. A SEM image of the nanocubes on the registered Si wafer is shown in Fig. 2a-2 at low magnification. As an example in Fig 2a-3, we show a high magnification SEM image of two typical individual nanocubes (particles number P6 and P7). Confocal fluorescence images for low and high magnifications are shown in Fig. 2b-2 and b-3, respectively. These images are collected using the same field-of-view as the SEM images shown in Fig. 2a-2 and a-3, respectively, to enable subsequent photostability and spectral measurements.

Figure 2
Figure 2

(a-1) Template of the registration marker which was milled on a silicon substrate using a focused ion beam (FIB) (b-1). SEM image of Cu2O nanocubes dropped cast on a silicon substrate with registration markers to enable the location of the exact area of a certain isolated Cu2O nanocube. (a-2) Low magnification SEM image of Cu2O nanocubes. This type of image was taken of different areas of the substrate to select individual nanocubes P1 to p19. (a-3) High-resolution SEM image of the boxed region in (a-2) which was taken after acquiring the optical data to avoid the effect of the electron beam on the optical properties of the Cu2O nanocubes. Particles P6 and P7 are shown as an example of two isolated nanocubes. (b-2) Confocal fluorescence image of the same field-of-view as in (a-2). (b-3) High-resolution confocal fluorescence image of the boxed region in (b-2) of particles P6 and P7.

UV-visible absorbance spectrum of Cu2O nanocubes in water was collected, which showed maximum absorbance appeared at 481 nm (Fig. 3a), in addition, the UV-Vis absorbance spectra near-IR absorbance at 750 nm which is well aligned with previously reported literatures1,3. Fluorescence spectral data was collected from individual and isolated Cu2O particles on the marked silicon substrate using 520 nm (2.38 eV) supercontinuum pulsed laser with 11 µW average excitation power (1.7 W/cm2) at room temperature with an FWHM = 10 nm. This pump wavelength was chosen because visible light excitation is compatible with biological imaging19. Under these excitation conditions, the emission peak of individual Cu2O nanocubes was centred around 754.6 ± 2 nm (Fig. 3b,c) which can be assigned to doubly charged oxygen vacancies (Vo)18 in the Cu2O nanocube lattice. Having an emission at 754 nm makes this material a promissing candidate for biological imaging as tissue absorption and autofluorescence are minimal in this emission range19. The peak in the distribution of full width at half-maximum (FWHM) emission is around 85 nm (Fig. 3d).

Figure 3
Figure 3

(a) UV-visible absorbance spectrum of Cu2O nanocubes in water. (b) Fluorescence emission spectra of 19 individual Cu2O nanocubes excited at 520 nm with a supercontinuum picosecond pulsed laser. (c) Emission peak wavelength distribution. The emission peak centered at 754.6 ± 2 nm which can be correlated to oxygen vacancy (Vo). This wavelength is well suited for biological imaging applications. (d) The peak in the distribution of full width at half-maximum (FWHM) emission is around 85 nm. (e) Fluorescence intensity of the same nanocubes as in (a) over a 120 second time period of continuous excitation with 11 μW time-averaged power at the sample from the supercontinuum pulsed laser. Emission intensities of these individual particles ranged between 226 k to 780 k counts/s. (f) Fluorescence emission intensity of 6 selected individual Cu2O nanocubes under 2 μW, 5 μW, 11 μW, 15 μW and 20 μW excitation power. The selected nanocubes in (f) are a subset, chosen for no particular reason, of those studied in (b) and (e). This result indicates that individual Cu2O nanocubes have the ability to produce considerably bright emission while using low excitation powers.

In addition to the emission wavelength, brightness and photostability are crucial factors for bioimaging applications. Brightness and photostability data were collected from the same isolated individual Cu2O particles (using 520 nm excitation wavelength with 11 µW average power with FWHM = 10 nm for 120 seconds), as shown in Fig. 3e. Emission counts ranged between 226 k and 780 k counts/s, and remained stable for a period of at least 120 seconds, indicating photostable characteristics of the Cu2O nanocubes. It should be mentioned that the laser power used in this part of the research is considerably lower than that used for some biological imaging applications25. For example, Goetz, M., et al. reported confocal imaging during mini-laparoscopy where they used 715 μW average laser power with maximum power limited to 2000 μW26. Laser power ranged between 300 mW and 600 mW was used for histomorphologic imaging of brain tumours in vivo27.

In addition, the relationship between excitation power and emission counts was studied for 6 individual Cu2O particles using 5 excitation powers (Fig. 3f). This study shows that it is possible to observe counts ranging between 76 k counts/s and 130 k counts/s from a single Cu2O nanocube using only 2 µW of excitation power with a pulsed laser. The intensity of emitted light was observed to increase with increasing excitation power (Fig. 3f). It is an important factor in bioimaging to use low power excitation lasers as there are reports indicating that higher laser power can damage biological samples22. The results showed that when a pulsed laser is used for imaging, saturation has not occurred over a range up to 20 µW laser excitation power. The intensity of the emission from individual Cu2O with 20 µW laser excitation was ranged between 470 k counts/s and 602 k counts/s. However, at the higher excitation powers, the intensities of the emission show a non-linear increase and the rate of the increase in the emission counts decreases as shown in supporting information Figure S2 for two individual nanocubes. However, the Cu2O nanocubes showed no saturation up to 207 µW average excitation power or 3.16E5 W/cm2 excitation power density that means the emission of these nanocubes remains stable even with high laser excitation. The brightness of individual Cu2O nanocubes suggests that a lower concentration of this nanomaterial might be required for biological imaging compared to the other fluorophores. Cytotoxicity of Cu2O nanoparticles on fish blood has been studied which showed concentration lower than 8 µg/mL has minor toxic effect for living cells28. This is an important factor when considering that high concentrations of fluorophores can be toxic to a biological system29

Photostability of the Cu2O nanocubes is also remarkable compared to standard commercially available fluorescent probes. It has previously been reported that commercially available fluorescent probes such as Alexa Fluor 647, polyacrylonitrile beads and carbon dots have a short bleaching time which limits their application for long term bioimaging studies during the course of an experiment21. Photostability of Cu2O was compared with photostability of Alexa 647, polyacrylonitrile beads, Au nanoclusters, carbon dots, nanodiamonds and nanorubies for two minutes21. Alexa 647 showed lowest photostability (2%) followed by Au nanoclusters (24%) and polyacrylonitrile beads (39%) (Fig. 4a and Table S1). Photostability of Cu2O was the highest (100%) which is similar to nanodiamonds and nanorubies compared to the aforementioned fluorescent probes (Fig. 4a). This comparison further highlights the potential this material has for long term biological imaging applications. A bioimaging demonstration of the intrinsically fluorescent Cu2O nanocubes was made through their use as fluorophores coupled with a mouse cumulus-oocyte complex. The Cu2O nanocubes were imaged with the same experimental conditions used for optical characterization of individual and isolated nanocubes in Fig. 2. The fluorescence emission of the Cu2O nanocubes was compared to the autofluorescence within the mouse cumulus-oocyte complex (Fig. 4b,c). The confocal image of the mouse cumulus-oocyte complex with Cu2O nanocubes drop-casted on the surface is shown in Fig. 4b. The bright dots on the surface of the mouse cumulus-oocyte complex correspond to the fluorescence emission from Cu2O nanocubes. The histogram in Fig. 4c shows the relative brightness of autofluorescence from the mouse cumulus-oocyte complex compared to Cu2O nanocube fluorescence. The autofluorescence histogram collected from the distribution of pixel intensities within the boxed region in Fig. 4b and the Cu2O histogram (Fig. 4c) shows the brightness distribution of 20 manually selected Cu2O particles in Fig. 4b. Fluorescence from Cu2O was observed to be four times higher in intensity compared to the autofluorescence signal from the cumulus-oocyte complex which made them easily distinguishable (Figs. 4c). The attractive characteristics of copper (I) oxide nanocubes, such as their long photostability and high brightness, highlight their potential as an alternative to commercially available fluorescent probes for bioimaging applications.

Figure 4
Figure 4

(a) Comparison of the photostability of Cu2O nanocubes with commercial dyes and emerging fluorescent nanoparticles over a time period of 120 seconds (Table S1)1. The photostability of Cu2O nanocubes are 98% higher than the widely used commercial Alexa 647 dye and 48% higher than carbon dots. Cu2O nanocubes, nanorubies and nanodiamonds are showing 100% photostability over this time period. (b) Confocal fluorescence image of a mouse cumulus-oocyte complex with Cu2O nanocubes. Bright dots are Cu2O nanocubes. (c) Histogram showing the relative brightness of autofluorescence (blue bars) and Cu2O nanocube fluorescence (orange bars). The autofluorescence histogram shows the distribution of pixel intensities within the boxed region in (b). The Cu2O histogram shows the brightness distribution of 20 manually selected Cu2O particles in (b). The Cu2O nanocubes were observed to be approximately 4 times brighter than autofluorescence from the mouse cumulus-oocyte complex hence making them easily distinguishable.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have synthesised copper (I) oxide nanocubes via a seed-mediated method. Individual Cu2O nanocubes were studied using a marked substrate which was milled with a focused ion beam to locate and collect optical data from 19 individual particles. This study reveals that single Cu2O nanocubes can emit light at a rate of up to 487 K counts/s for at least 120 seconds with only 11 µW (1.7 W/cm2) laser excitation. Highly bright and photostable intrinsic fluorescence from copper (I) oxide nanocubes at low excitation powers suggest that the nanocubes are suitable for long time bioimaging experiments. Fluorescence from Cu2O nanocubes was also observed to be significantly brighter than the auto-fluorescence from a fixed mouse cumulus-oocyte complex and highly photostable compared to commercially available organic fluorescent materials. However, for in vivo applications, there is further research to be undertaken to determine the biocompatibility of copper (I) oxide nanocubes as a function of their concentration in a biological context.

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Kuo, C. H., Chen, C. H. & Huang, M. H. Seed-Mediated Synthesis of Monodispersed Cu2O Nanocubes with Five Different Size Ranges from 40 to 420 nm. Advanced Functional Materials 17, 3773–3780, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200700356 (2007).

  2. 2.

    Kuo, C.-H. & Huang, M. H. Morphologically controlled synthesis of Cu 2 O nanocrystals and their properties. Nano Today 5, 106–116 (2010).

  3. 3.

    Kandjani, A. E. et al. Controlling core/shell formation of Nanocubic p-Cu2O/n-ZnO toward enhanced photocatalytic performance. Langmuir 31, 10922–10930, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01019 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Zhang, J., Liu, J., Peng, Q., Wang, X. & Li, Y. Nearly Monodisperse Cu2O and CuO Nanospheres: Preparation and Applications for Sensitive Gas Sensors. Chemistry of Materials 18, 867–871, https://doi.org/10.1021/cm052256f (2006).

  5. 5.

    Zoolfakar, A. S., Rani, R. A., Morfa, A. J., O’Mullane, A. P. & Kalantar-zadeh, K. Nanostructured copper oxide semiconductors: a perspective on materials, synthesis methods and applications. J Mater Chem C 2, 5247–5270, https://doi.org/10.1039/c4tc00345d (2014).

  6. 6.

    Gou, L. & Murphy, C. J. Solution-phase synthesis of Cu2O nanocubes. Nano Letters 3, 231–234 (2003).

  7. 7.

    Park, J. C., Kim, J., Kwon, H. & Song, H. Gram‐scale synthesis of Cu2O nanocubes and subsequent oxidation to CuO hollow nanostructures for lithium‐ion battery anode materials. Advanced Materials 21, 803–807 (2009).

  8. 8.

    Liu, R., Oba, F., Bohannan, E. W., Ernst, F. & Switzer, J. A. Shape control in epitaxial electrodeposition: Cu2O nanocubes on InP (001). Chemistry of materials 15, 4882–4885 (2003).

  9. 9.

    Tsai, Y.-H., Chanda, K., Chu, Y.-T., Chiu, C.-Y. & Huang, M. H. Direct formation of small Cu2O nanocubes, octahedra, and octapods for efficient synthesis of triazoles. Nanoscale 6, 8704–8709 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Chen, L. Y., Yu, J. S., Fujita, T. & Chen, M. W. Nanoporous copper with tunable nanoporosity for SERS applications. Advanced Functional Materials 19, 1221–1226 (2009).

  11. 11.

    Xu, L. et al. Solution-phase synthesis of single-crystal hollow Cu2O spheres with nanoholes. Nanotechnology 17, 1501 (2006).

  12. 12.

    Ke, W. H., Hsia, C. F., Chen, Y. J. & Huang, M. H. Synthesis of Ultrasmall Cu2O Nanocubes and Octahedra with Tunable Sizes for Facet‐Dependent Optical Property Examination. Small 12, 3530–3534 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Yang, Z., Chiang, C.-K. & Chang, H.-T. Synthesis of fluorescent and photovoltaic Cu2O nanocubes. Nanotechnology 19, 025604 (2008).

  14. 14.

    Serin, N. & Serin, T. The photocapacitance property of Cu/Cu2O/Au sandwich structures. Semiconductor science and technology 17, 1162 (2002).

  15. 15.

    Qi, W. J., Huang, C. Z. & Chen, L. Q. Cuprous oxide nanospheres as probes for light scattering imaging analysis of live cells and for conformation identification of proteins. Talanta 80, 1400–1405, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2009.09.042 (2010).

  16. 16.

    Kondo, J. Cu 2 O as a photocatalyst for overall water splitting under visible light irradiation. Chemical Communications, 357-358 (1998).

  17. 17.

    Wu, S.-C., Tan, C.-S. & Huang, M. H. Strong Facet Effects on Interfacial Charge Transfer Revealed through the Examination of Photocatalytic Activities of Various Cu2 O-ZnO Heterostructures. Advanced Functional Materials 27, 1604635, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201604635 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Li, J. et al. Probing defects in nitrogen-doped Cu2O. Sci Rep 4, 7240, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep07240 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Kobayashi, H., Ogawa, M., Alford, R., Choyke, P. L. & Urano, Y. New strategies for fluorescent probe design in medical diagnostic imaging. Chemical reviews 110, 2620–2640 (2009).

  20. 20.

    Morfa, A. J. et al. Single-photon emission and quantum characterization of zinc oxide defects. Nano Lett 12, 949–954, https://doi.org/10.1021/nl204010e (2012).

  21. 21.

    Reineck, P. et al. Brightness and Photostability of Emerging Red and Near-IR Fluorescent Nanomaterials for Bioimaging. Advanced Optical Materials 4, 1549–1557, https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201600212 (2016).

  22. 22.

    Jacques, S. L. Role of tissue optics and pulse duration on tissue effects during high-power laser irradiation. Appl Opt 32, 2447–2454, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.32.002447 (1993).

  23. 23.

    Ampem-Lassen, E. et al. Nano-manipulation of diamond-based single photon sources. Opt Express 17, 11287–11293 (2009).

  24. 24.

    Meczynska-Wielgosz, S., Piotrowska, A., Majkowska-Pilip, A., Bilewicz, A. & Kruszewski, M. Effect of Surface Functionalization on the Cellular Uptake and Toxicity of Nanozeolite A. Nanoscale Res Lett 11, 123, https://doi.org/10.1186/s11671-016-1334-8 (2016).

  25. 25.

    Chung, H. et al. The nuts and bolts of low-level laser (light) therapy. Ann Biomed Eng 40, 516–533, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-011-0454-7 (2012).

  26. 26.

    Goetz, M. et al. Near-infrared confocal imaging during mini-laparoscopy: a novel rigid endomicroscope with increased imaging plane depth. J Hepatol 53, 84–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2010.01.039 (2010).

  27. 27.

    Foersch, S. et al. Confocal laser endomicroscopy for diagnosis and histomorphologic imaging of brain tumors in vivo. PLoS One 7, e41760, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041760 (2012).

  28. 28.

    Chen, L. Q., Kang, B. & Ling, J. Cytotoxicity of cuprous oxide nanoparticles to fish blood cells: hemolysis and internalization. Journal of nanoparticle research 15, 1507 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Alford, R. et al. Toxicity of Organic Fluorophores Used in Molecular Imaging: Literature Review. Molecular Imaging 8, 341–354, https://doi.org/10.2310/7290.2009.00031 (2009).

Download references

Acknowledgements

N.Z. acknowledges RMIT University support of a PhD Scholarship. This work has been supported by ARC grants (FT110100225, LE140100131, CE140100003). B.C.G. acknowledges the support of an ARC Future Fellowship (FT110100225). Experiments were performed in the ARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics (CNBP) laboratories and the RMIT Microscopy and Microanalysis Facility (RMMF) at RMIT University. CNBP and RMMF technical staffs are acknowledged for their help and assistance with setting up the experiments.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. ARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia

    • Nafisa Zohora
    • , Antony Orth
    •  & Brant C. Gibson
  2. Centre for Advanced Materials and Industrial Chemistry, School of Science, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia

    • Ahmad Esmaielzadeh Kandjani
  3. ARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics, Robinson Research Institute, Adelaide Medical School,The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

    • Hannah M. Brown
  4. ARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics, Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia

    • Mark R. Hutchinson

Authors

  1. Search for Nafisa Zohora in:

  2. Search for Ahmad Esmaielzadeh Kandjani in:

  3. Search for Antony Orth in:

  4. Search for Hannah M. Brown in:

  5. Search for Mark R. Hutchinson in:

  6. Search for Brant C. Gibson in:

Contributions

N.Z. carried out the experiments. N.Z., A.E.K., A.O., M.R.H. and B.C.G. analysed the data, contributed to data interpretation. H.M.B. provided the mouse cumulus-oocyte complexes. All authors contributed in the manuscript writing. B.C.G. supervised the research.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Nafisa Zohora or Brant C. Gibson.

Electronic supplementary material

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.