Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Laminar flow drag reduction on soft porous media

Abstract

While researches have focused on drag reduction of various coated surfaces such as superhydrophobic structures and polymer brushes, the insights tso understand the fundamental physics of the laminar skin friction coefficient and the related drag reduction due to the formation of finite velocity at porous surfaces is still relatively unknown. Herein, we quantitatively investigated the flow over a porous medium by developing a framework to model flow of a Newtonian fluid in a channel where the lower surface was replaced by various porous media. We showed that the flow drag reduction induced by the presence of the porous media depends on the values of the permeability parameter α = L/(MK)1/2 and the height ratio δ = H/L, where L is the half thickness of the free flow region, H is the thickness and K is the permeability of the fiber layer, and M is the ratio of the fluid effective dynamic viscosity μe in porous media to its dynamic viscosity μ. We also examined the velocity and shear stress profiles for flow over the permeable layer for the limiting cases of α → 0 and α → ∞. The model predictions were compared with the experimental data for specific porous media and good agreement was found.

Introduction

The possibility of using soft, porous, highly compressible materials as lubricating layers is a new concept that has grown out of several fundamental biological questions related to the role of the fiber matrix layers that surround cells in an in vivo fluid environment1. In fact, experimental studies of blood flow in microvessels revealed differences from analytical predictions based on in vitro observations2. It was found that the main reason for these differences is the presence of a relatively thick (~1 μm) layer of macromolecules bound to the endothelial cells lining microvessel walls3. This layer, which is located on the luminal surface of vascular cells, is called the endothelial glycocalyx layer (EGL) (Fig. 1a). While the existence of the surface glycocalyx has been known for several decades4, only in the past few years has it been appreciated as an important factor in vascular physiology and pathology5. Computer-enhanced images showed that the glycocalyx is a 3D fibrous mesh network. Using a freeze-fracture method, it was also shown that the fibers formed a hexagonal array with an inter-cluster spacing of typically 100 nm in frog lung capillaries6.

In addition to preventing adhesive molecular interaction between proteins in the red cell membrane and their ligands in the plasmalemma membrane of the endothelial cell, the EGL provides a red blood cell “exclusion zone” or “gap” between the flowing red blood cells and the endothelial membrane as shown in Fig. 1b. It was also shown that the EGL reduces the volume fraction of the red blood cells and affects interactions of blood cells with vessel walls7.

Feng and Weinbaum8 further found the so-called “pop out” phenomenon in which at velocities <20 μm/s the red cells entered the EGL and, when motion was arrested, the red cells crushed the glycocalyx and filled nearly the entire lumen of the capillary. At velocities >20 μm/s, the red cells appeared to glide above the EGL, and there was a narrow intervening fluid gap. To describe the latter motion, a lubrication theory for soft porous highly compressible materials with periodic fiber arrays was developed8. Later a lubrication theory for randomly oriented soft porous media was also established9. Using the proposed lubrication theory, it was shown that the corresponding generated lift forces could be four orders of magnitude greater than those predicted by classical lubrication theory9,10,11.

The concept of the almost frictionless movement of red blood cells through tiny capillaries and the impact of the EGL on the red blood cell motion inspired us to examine a totally different scenario: analysis of the laminar skin friction coefficient and drag reduction in micorchannels where the bottom solid surface is replaced with a layer of porous material with permeability K and porosity ε. While the topic of drag reduction has been the focus of recent research on surfaces coated with a broad array of structures such as superhydrophobic structures and polymer brushes, the insights to understand the fundamental physics of the laminar skin friction coefficient and the related drag reduction due to the formation of a slip velocity at the surface of a porous media boundary in the pressure-driven flow is still not fully understood. Herein, we focus on answering the questions including: 1) What is the relation between the characteristics of the porous media (i.e., permeability, and porosity) and the geometry of the channel with the resulting drag on the porous walls? 2) Can replacing an impermeable wall with a permeable surface be used as a new passive technique for reducing friction in a pressure-driven duct flow? 3) How the characteristics of porous media and channel geometry can be correlated to the drag force on the wall?

Coupled flows through and over porous layers have been covered in several papers. A great number of publications12,13,14,15,16 provide reviews of related research developments in the literature. Researchers have investigated flow over sediment beds17, coral reefs and submerged vegetation canopies18, crop canopies and forests19, endothelial glycocalyx of blood vessels20, flow over carbon nanotubes (CNTs)21, and polymer brushes22,23, and the finite-Reynolds flow in a channel bounded by one or two porous media modeled by cubic sphere arrays24. The drag reduction due to the motion of a viscous fluid, in laminar and turbulent flows, over CNTs, over patterned surfaces, and over various other structured surfaces has been examined experimentally and theoretically25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46. However, to the best of our knowledge, no one has ever attempted to characterize the laminar drag reduction in a channel in the presence of porous walls. In this study, we present analytical description of the laminar skin friction coefficient and the corresponding drag reduction of the flow at the fluid-porous interface inside a channel with the lower surface replaced with various porous layers with Darcy permeability K, and porosity ε. The conditions for which the porous materials can be used as a new passive technique for reducing drag in laminar flow regimes were also described.

Mathematical formulation

In this section, we consider a fully developed, incompressible flow driven by a constant pressure gradient $$d\tilde{{\rm{p}}}/d\tilde{{\rm{x}}}$$ within a two-dimensional (2D) channel where H is the thickness of a porous layer with permeability K and porosity ε and 2 L is the height of the free flow. The two regions of a core flow and a flow through the porous layer are sketched in Fig. 2. The effective medium approach (Brinkman equation) is used for flow through the porous medium and the flow in the core region is described by the Navier-Stokes equation for unidirectional axial flow in a rectangular channel. For this fully-developed flow, the inertial terms vanish. Thus, the simplified equations in the laminar regime can be expressed as

$${\mu }_{e}\frac{{d}^{2}\tilde{u}}{d{\tilde{y}}^{2}}-\frac{\mu }{K}\tilde{u}-\frac{d\tilde{p}}{d\tilde{x}}=0,\tilde{y}\in [-H,0]\,$$
(1)
$$\mu \frac{{d}^{2}\tilde{u}}{d{\tilde{y}}^{2}}-\frac{d\tilde{p}}{d\tilde{x}}=0,\tilde{y}\in [0,2L]\,$$
(2)

where $$\tilde{u}$$represents the horizontal component of the velocity throughout the channel, μ is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid, and μ e is the effective viscosity of fluid in the porous layer. The effective viscosity in porous media is widely discussed in previous studies47. The conclusion of these earlier studies is that for high porosity material, μ e  → μ. The boundary conditions on the two walls of the channel, namely at $$\tilde{y}=-H$$ and $$\tilde{y}=2L$$ need to be specified. We then require that the no-slip boundary condition to be satisfied, that is $$\tilde{u}(-H)=0$$ and $$\tilde{u}(2L)=0$$. In addition, the boundary conditions at the fluid-porous layer interface must be prescribed. Herein, following the researchers21,48 we require that the velocity and fluid shear stress to be continuous at the fluid-porous interface (i.e., at $$\tilde{y}=0$$). The continuity of velocity and shear stress at the fluid-porous interface implies that $$\tilde{\,u}({0}^{-})=\tilde{u}({0}^{+})=\tilde{U},{\mu }_{e}{(\frac{d\tilde{u}}{d\tilde{y}})}_{\tilde{y}={0}^{-}}=\mu {(\frac{d\tilde{u}}{d\tilde{y}})}_{\tilde{y}={0}^{+}}$$ where, $$\tilde{U}$$is the velocity at the fluid-porous interface.

In addition, the half of the height of the free fluid, L, the velocity $$q=-(\frac{{L}^{2}}{\mu })\frac{d\tilde{p}}{d\tilde{x}}$$ and the fluid viscosity, μ are chosen as the repeating variables to analyze a wide range of parameter changes in the system as well as to resolve the infinite solutions. Thus, the solutions for the dimensionless velocity profile,$$\,u=\tilde{u}/q$$, over and through the soft porous media can be given by

$$u(y)=\frac{1}{M{\alpha }^{2}}+{C}_{1}{e}^{\alpha y}+{C}_{2}{e}^{-\alpha y},y\in [-\delta ,0]$$
(3)
$$u(y)=-\frac{{y}^{2}}{2}+(1-\frac{U}{2})y+U,y\in [0,2]\,$$
(4)
$${C}_{1,2}=\pm \frac{1}{M{\alpha }^{2}}\frac{(M{\alpha }^{2}U-1){e}^{\pm \alpha \delta }+1}{{e}^{\alpha \delta }-{e}^{-\alpha \delta }}\,U=\frac{1-\,{\rm sech} \,\alpha \delta +\alpha \,\tanh \,\alpha \delta }{\beta M{\alpha }^{2}}\,$$
(5)
$$\beta =(1+\frac{\tanh \,\alpha \delta }{2M\alpha })$$
(6)

where

$$y=\frac{\tilde{y}}{L},M=\frac{{\mu }_{e}}{\mu },{\alpha }^{2}=\frac{{L}^{2}}{MK},\delta =\frac{H}{L},U=\tilde{U}/q$$
(7)

Moreover, the fluid shear stress in the free flow and inside the soft porous material can be described as,$$\,\tilde{\tau }=\mu \frac{d\tilde{u}}{d\tilde{y}}$$ when $$\tilde{y}\in [0,2L]$$ and $$\tilde{\tau }={\mu }_{e}\frac{d\tilde{u}}{d\tilde{y}}$$ for $$\tilde{y}\in [-H,0]$$ and in the dimensionless form they can be expressed as $$\tau =L\tilde{\tau }/\mu q$$. Note that the solid shear stress inside the porous media is not evaluated in the present study. Thus, the fluid shear stress in the pressure-driven channel flow with the solid wall replaced with soft porous media can be obtained as

$$\tau (y)=M(\frac{du}{dy})=M\alpha ({C}_{1}{e}^{\alpha y}-{C}_{2}{e}^{-\alpha y}),y\in [-\delta ,0]$$
(8)
$$\tau (y)=(\frac{du}{dy})=(-y+1-\frac{U}{2}),y\in [0,2]\,$$
(9)

Evaluating the fluid shear stress at the fluid-porous medium interface,$$\,{\tilde{\tau }}_{w}=\mu {\frac{d\tilde{u}}{d\tilde{y}}|}_{\tilde{y}={0}^{+}}$$, the skin friction coefficient is given as $${C}_{f}=2{\tilde{\tau }}_{w}/\rho {\tilde{u}}_{ave}^{2}$$. Herein, Re is the Reynolds number in the core free flow region defined as $$\,Re=2L{\tilde{u}}_{ave}/\nu$$, where v is the kinematic viscosity of the fluid and $${\tilde{u}}_{ave}=q{u}_{ave}\,\,\,$$ is the average velocity of the flow through the non-porous section where the dimensionless average velocity is given by $${u}_{ave}=\frac{{\int }_{0}^{2}u(y)dy}{2}$$. Thus, the skin friction coefficient due to the presence of the soft porous wall can be defined as C f  = A/Re, where $$A=\frac{8(1-U/2)}{{\int }_{0}^{2}u(y)dy}$$ is a constant. This equation provides a closed-form expression for the skin friction coefficient, C f when the properties of the soft porous media such as permeability, the channel geometry and the flow conditions are identified.

It should be noted that these results simply indicate that for δ = H/L = 0 we obtain the same results as in a channel with impermeable walls, where the dimensionless velocity profile is given by $$u(y)=-{y}^{2}/2+y,$$ $$y\in [0,2]$$. Thus, the well-known skin friction formula $${C}_{{f}_{s}}=\frac{12}{Re}$$ for laminar flows in two-dimensional channel with smooth solid walls is obtained49. One can then calculate the laminar drag reduction for a channel with one impervious wall replaced with soft porous media as

$$DR \% =100(1-\frac{{C}_{f}}{{C}_{{f}_{s}}}) \% =100(1-\frac{A}{12}) \% .$$
(10)

Special cases analysis

The asymptotic behavior of the flow is examined in this section. When α → ∞, the velocity and shear stress profiles, and the constant of friction coefficient reduce to

$$\mathop{{lim}}\limits_{\alpha \to \infty }u(y)=\{\begin{array}{ll}\frac{y(2-y)}{2} & y\in [0,2]\\ 0 & y\in [-\delta ,0]\end{array}\,$$
(11)
$$\mathop{\,{lim}}\limits_{\alpha \to \infty }\tau (y)=\{\begin{array}{ll}1-y & y\in [0,2]\\ \,0 & y\in [-\delta ,0]\end{array}\,$$
(12)
$$\mathop{{lim}}\limits_{\alpha \to \infty }A=12\,y\in [-\delta ,2]$$
(13)

These results show that when α → ∞, the velocity profile and skin friction coefficient asymptotically approach to the expressions for the pressure-driven flow in a channel with impermeable walls and dimensionless height of 2, and there will be no drag reduction.

In the limit when α → 0, which corresponds to an infinite value of K, the expressions for velocity and shear stress profiles, and the constant of friction coefficient simplify to

$$\mathop{{lim}}\limits_{\alpha \to 0}u(y)=\frac{(\delta +y)(2-y)}{2}\,y\in [-\delta ,2]$$
(14)
$$\mathop{{lim}}\limits_{\alpha \to 0}\tau (y)=1-y-\delta /2\,y\in [-\delta ,2]$$
(15)
$$\mathop{{lim}}\limits_{\alpha \to 0}A=\frac{12(2-\delta )}{3\delta +2}\,y\in [-\delta ,2]$$
(16)

Eqs. (1416) reveal that for the case when α → 0, there are significant drag reduction depending on the value of δ. For δ = 2 the wall shear stress at the fluid-porous interface at y = 0 becomes zero and the maximum drag reduction of 100% will be achieved.

Results and Discussion

The fluid velocity and shear stress profiles across the channel including inside the porous layer as predicted by equations (39), for two fiber layer thicknesses, are shown in Fig. 3(a–d). In the large α = L/(MK)1/2 limit (α ≥ 10), the core velocity profile is parabolic except near the interface, where the velocity drops to very small values. In addition, for large values of α, when the permeability of the porous material becomes low, the velocity profile inside the porous layer shows the characteristic of plug flow, except near the free fluid-porous medium interface (Fig. 3a,c). Also, for large α values the fluid shear stress in the porous layer decays to zero. This is because as the permeability decreases, the bulk of shear stress is sustained by the fibers in the porous layer, which results in very small velocity and fluid shear stress (Fig. 3b,d). For comparison, the asymptotic solutions of equations (11), (12), (14), and (15) in the limits of α → ∞ and α → 0 are shown, respectively, by dotted lines and dashed lines in Fig. 3. These results clearly show that as α → ∞ the velocity and shear stress profiles asymptotically approach to the outcomes of the pressure-driven flow in a channel with solid smooth walls and a height of 2 L. Similarly, when α → 0, the velocity and shear stress profiles become those for a clear channel with the height of 2 L + H.

Figure 4 shows the variation of the drag reduction, DR%, versus δ when α → 0. This figure reveals that as δ increases, the drag reduction in the channel increases and at δ = 2, the maximum drag reduction of 100% is achieved. Thus, the implication of this figure is that the maximum drag reduction occurs in a system when the height of the free flow region is the same as the thickness of the porous layer (i.e., δ = 2). Also, in this case we have the highest permeable porous media as a boundary (i.e., K ≈ ∞). Accordingly, all subsequent calculations are presented for δ ranging from 0 to 2.

Figure 5(a–d) show the variation of laminar skin friction coefficient versus the Reynolds number for different values of α at δ = 0.1, 0.5, 1, and 2. For comparison, the prediction of the friction coefficient for the channel with solid impermeable walls, $${C}_{{f}_{s}}=\frac{12}{Re}\,\,$$, is reproduced in these figures by dotted lines, which also coincide with the asymptotic solution of Cf in the limit when α → ∞. Similarly, the asymptotic solution of Cf in the limit when α → 0 is shown by dashed lines. As can be seen in Fig. 5(a–d), for all values of δ and the Reynolds number ranging from 0 to 100, the skin friction coefficient for various porous layers are found to lie well below that of the channel with solid walls (α → ∞). Figure 5(a–d) shows that for all values of the height ratio δ, and permeability parameter α, a finite slip velocity is generated at the fluid-porous interface, which helps the fluid motion through the channel and reduces the drag. It is also seen that the skin friction coefficient decreases as Re increases and/or α decreases. The sensitivity of the variation of Cf with α also varies depending on the thickness of the porous layer. It should be noted that as the height ratio, δ increases to a value of 2, in the limit when α → 0, Cf becomes zero and this result could not be shown in a log-plot in Fig. 5d.

For a more clear comparison, variations of drag reduction DR% versus α for different δ values are shown in Fig. 6a. This figure shows that as α increases the drag reduction decays to zero for all values of δ. Also, as δ increases the drag reduction increases. For small values of α corresponding to high permeability, even for small thicknesses of porous wall, there are meaningful drag reductions in the system. However, for large values of α (low values of permeability), the porous-wall surface would not provide much drag reduction in the channel even for large values of δ. As the height ratio increases to 2 where the height of the free-flow and the thickness of the fiber layer are the same, the maximum drag reduction in the system occurs.

The drag reduction, DR%, as a function of δ for various permeability parameters α are plotted in Fig. 6b. This figure shows that the amount of drag reduction in the channel with a porous wall depends strongly on the values of δ and α. When permeability parameter α decreases and/or the height ratio δ increases, an increase in the drag reduction is predicted. As α decreases further, the drag reduction approaches to the asymptotic solution for α → 0. Figure 6b also shows that the presence of permeable boundary always leads to drag reduction compared to the channel with solid walls. When the permeability and the thickness of the fiber layer decrease, the drag reduction also decreases. In this case, for large values of α, there is a very small drag reduction in the channel. For α → ∞, the skin friction coefficient asymptotically approaches to the result of the pressure-driven flow in a channel with solid walls with no drag reduction. One interesting finding from Fig. 6(a,b) is that for each value of α, there is a range of δ values for which the maximum drag reductions in the channel occur.

Theoretical validation and experimental methods

In order to validate our analytical predictions presented in previous sections, a series of experiments was conducted and the pressure drops across the channel for a range of conditions were measured. The schematic of the experimental set-up for pressure drop measurements is shown in Fig. 7. The experimental set-up was composed of a rectangular channel made of optically clear acrylic for flow visualization. The channel had a fixed height of 25 mm and a width of 42 mm. The working fluid consisted of 80% glycerin in 20% water, which was well stirred to maintain homogeneity as well as transparency. The resulting fluid had a viscosity and density of μ = 0.07 Pa.s and ρ = 1.21 g/cm3, respectively. A peristaltic pump (Simply Pump Inc.) was used to pump the fluid through the system. The pump had a maximum head of 20 ft. A flowmeter (Hedland Inc.; Range: 0.1~1.0 GPM) was also utilized for measuring the flow rate through the system. A dampener (BLACOH Fluid Control, Inc.) damped the effect of pulsatility of the pump during the experiments. A pressure gauge (Omega Inc.) with testing range 0~4.0 inH2O was used to measure the pressure drop in the channel. Interchangeable surfaces were placed on the bottom of the channel to adjust the height of the free fluid and to keep it constant during the test. In these experiments, the lower solid wall was shifted to accommodate for the permeable layer boundary conditions, while maintaining the same free flow channel height. The porous media used was manufactured by Mountain Mist that were made of random array of fibers with 5% silk and 95% polyester.

In order to obtain additional experimental data for various values of $${\rm{\delta }}=\frac{{\rm{H}}}{{\rm{L}}}$$ and α, two different porous materials with the thickness of H = 4.2 mm and H = 5.5 mm, were used. Therefore, by controlling the height of free fluid section, different values of permeability parameter α and height ratio δ were obtained. We also measured the required entrance length for reaching fully developed velocity profiles in the channel to ensure that the flow enters the measurement zone under fully developed condition. Also, we maintained an average 5:1 cross-sectional aspect ratio for the channel to decrease the wall effects along the channel width. To keep the experimental condition the same as that of our analytical predictions, we have used two porous media with relatively low permeability K and high α. This was because as can be observed in Fig. 3(a–d) for large values of α (α > 10), the velocity profile has the characteristic of plug flow inside the porous media. Also, for large α values the fluid shear stress decreases to zero in the porous layer. Thus, we expect to perform the same results as in our theoretical analysis.

Before conducting the channel flow tests, we measured the Darcy permeability K, of the sample porous materials by performing the Darcy experiments. According to Darcy’s law

$$K=\frac{{\tilde{{\rm{Q}}}{\rm{L}}}_{{\rm{d}}}{\rm{\mu }}}{{\rm{A}}{\rm{\Delta }}\tilde{{\rm{P}}}},$$
(17)

where $$\tilde{{\rm{Q}}}$$ is the volume flow rate, Ld is the sample length over which the pressure drop occurs, and A is the cross-sectional area of the porous layer. The experimental measurements of Darcy permeability for the two porous media used in the experiments led to the values of 7.2 × 10−8 m2 and 6.2 × 10−8 m2. The corresponding porosities were measured to be 0.97 and 0.98.

Six sets of pressure drop experiments with different values of $$\delta =\frac{H}{L}$$ and $$\alpha =\frac{L}{\sqrt{MK}}$$ were conducted. Each set of experiments included two different tests: 1) a channel with solid walls, and 2) a channel with a porous wall. For these tests, the cross-sectional area of free flow section and the volume flow rates through the channel were identical. We also evaluated the Reynolds number for these tests based on the flow in the nonporous region. In these experiments, we measured drag reduction as46

$$DR{ \% }_{exp}\approx (1-\frac{{\rm{\Delta }}\tilde{{\rm{P}}}}{{{\rm{\Delta }}\tilde{{\rm{P}}}}_{s}}) \% \,$$
(18)

where $${{\rm{\Delta }}\tilde{{\rm{P}}}}_{s}$$ corresponds to the measured pressure drop in channel with solid walls and $${\rm{\Delta }}\tilde{{\rm{P}}}$$ is the measured pressure drop in the channel with one porous-wall. The predicted value of drag reduction, DR% theo , was evaluated by using the experimental permeability parameter α and height ratio δ in equations (310). The values of the height ratio δ, permeability parameter α, experimental drag reduction DR% exp , and predicted drag reduction DR% theo are listed in Table 1. This table shows that the predicted drag reductions are in good agreement with those obtained from the experiments.

Figure 8 also shows the comparison of the theoretical DR%theo with the experimental DR%exp. The theoretical model predictions cover a range of values for δ and α. The experimental data were for specific values of parameter that are listed in Table 1 and are also shown in the figure by symbols. It is seen that the experimental data agree well with the theoretical predictions; however, there is some discrepancies particularly for smaller values of α. The deviations are attributed to the limitations in our study: 1) In the theoretical model it was assumed that the porous medium is distributed uniformly and the porous-fluid interface was smooth and at a fixed level. In the experiments, however, the distribution of fibers might have introduced variations in the level of fluid-porous media interface and also inhomogeneity of porosity or permeability near the interface, in addition to some surface roughness, 2) The experimental setup had a cross-sectional aspect ratio around (5:1), but in the analytical model the channel was considered to be two-dimensional and the 3D effects were neglected, 3) Correlations were made with Reynolds number that was based on the flow in the non-porous section. While this maybe a reasonable assumption for low permeability porous layer, it will introduce errors when permeability is high, and 4) The accuracy of the experimental measurement devices such as the pressure gauge and flow meter would also impact the experimental data.

Conclusions

Laminar flows over permeable surfaces occur in various engineering applications1,6,8,9,10,11. Drag reduction in the presence of a porous boundary could significantly advance microfluidic-based devices in a wide range of industrial applications, in particular in biomedical fields. In this study, we developed an analytical framework for predicting laminar fluid flows and the corresponding drag reductions in ducts when the bottom solid surface of the channel is replaced with permeable layers. Particular attention was given to the case when the porosity of the porous layer is close to 1. Based on the presented results the following conclusions are drawn:

1. (1)

The presented results showed that the flow drag reduction was induced when the lower solid surface of a channel was replaced by a porous medium. The amount of drag reduction was shown to depend on the permeability parameter α = L/(MK)1/2 and the height ratio δ = H/L.

2. (2)

The limiting behavior of the flow over the porous boundary for both α → 0 and α → ∞ were evaluated. It was found that as α → ∞ the velocity and shear stress profiles asymptotically approaches to the limit of the pressure-driven flow in a channel with solid walls with height of 2 L. In the case when α → 0, the velocity and shear stress profiles becomes the same as those of a wider channel with a height of 2 L + H.

3. (3)

The model correlates the resulting reduction in drag to the characteristics of the permeable boundary surface. That is, with the knowledge of the channel geometry, the fluid bulk velocity, and the porosity and permeability of the porous wall, one can evaluate the drag reduction in the system.

4. (4)

The presented model reveals the relation between the physical properties of the permeable layer and the features of the fluid flows including drag reduction that can be used for designing relevant engineering systems. For example, knowing the values of the permeability parameter and the height ratio provides guidance for designing laboratory-scaled-model that are dynamically similar to their industrial scale prototypes.

In addition, for verifying the accuracy of the developed analytical model, several experiments were conducted for large values of α with specific height ratios and permeability parameters. Comparison of the results showed good agreements between the experimental data and analytical predictions for drag reduction.

Studying the effect of height variations of the fluid-porous media interface, and heterogeneity of porous media as well as the deformation of fibers and their interactions with the fluid flow are left for future studies.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

1. 1.

Weinbaum, S. Models to solve mysteries in biomechanics at the cellular levels; a new view of fiber matrix layer. Ann. Biomed. Engng. 26, 1–17 (1998).

2. 2.

Pries, A. R. et al. Resistance to blood flow in microvessels in vivo. Circ. Res. 75, 904–915 (1994).

3. 3.

Pries, A. R., Secomb, T. W. & Gaehtgens, P. The endothelial surface layer. Pflugers Arch. 440, 653–666 (2000).

4. 4.

Luft, J. H. Fine structure of capillary and endocapillary layer as revealed by ruthenium red. Proc. Fed. Am. Soc. Expl Biol. 25, 1773–1783 (1965).

5. 5.

Vink, H. & Duling, B. R. Identification of distinct luminal domains for macromolecules, erythrocytes and leukocytes within mammalian capillaries. Circ. Res. 71, 581–589 (1996).

6. 6.

Weinbaum, S. et al. Mechanotransduction and flow across the endothelial glycocalyx. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 100, 7988–7996 (2003).

7. 7.

Secomb, T. W., Hsu, T. W. R. & Pries, A. R. Motion of red blood cells in a capillary with an endothelial surface layer: effect of flow velocity. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 281, 629–636 (2001).

8. 8.

Feng, J. & Weinbaum, S. Lubrication theory in highly compressible porous media: the mechanics of skiing, from red cells to humans. J. Fluid Mech. 422, 288–317 (2000).

9. 9.

Mirbod, P., Andreopoulos, Y. & Weinbaum, S. On the generation of lift forces in random soft porous media. J. Fluid Mech. 619, 147–166 (2009).

10. 10.

Mirbod, P., Andreopoulos, Y. & Weinbaum, S. Application of soft porous materials to a high-Speed Train track. J. Porous Media 12, 1037–1052 (2009).

11. 11.

Al-chidiac, M., Mirbod, P., Andreopoulos, Y. & Weinbaum, S. Dynamic compaction of soft compressible porous materials: experiments on air-solid phase interaction. J. Por. Media. 12, 1019–1035 (2009).

12. 12.

Bear, J. Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media. (Elsevier, 1972).

13. 13.

Scheidegger, A. E. The Physics of Flow through Porous Media. (University of Toronto Press., 1974).

14. 14.

Greenkorn, R. A. Flow Phenomena in Porous Media. (Marcel Dekker, 1983).

15. 15.

Nield, D. A. & Bejan, A. Convection in Porous Media. (Springer, 1992).

16. 16.

Huang, H. & Ayoub, J. Applicability of the Forcheimer equation for non-Darcy flow in porous media. SPE J. 13, 112–122 (2008).

17. 17.

Goharzadeh, A., Khalili, A. & Jorgensen, B. B. Transition layer thickness at a fluid-porous interface. Phys. Fluids 17, 057102.1–057102.10 (2005).

18. 18.

Ghisalberti, M. & Nepf, H. Shallow flows over a permeable medium: the hydrodynamics of submerged aquatic canopies. Transp. Porous Med. 78, 385–402 (2009).

19. 19.

Kruijt, B. et al. Turbulence statistics above and within two Amazon rain forest canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. 94, 297–331 (2000).

20. 20.

Guo, P., Weinstein, A. M. & Weinbaum, S. A hydrodynamic mechanosensory hypothesis for brush border microvilli. American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology 279, F698–F712 (2000).

21. 21.

Battiato, I., Bandaru, P. R. & Tartakovsky, D. M. Elastic response of carbon nanotube forests to aerodynamic stresses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 144504.1–144504.4 (2010).

22. 22.

Tachie, M. F., James, D. F. & Currie, I. G. Slow flow through a brush. Physics of Fluids 16, 445–451 (2004).

23. 23.

Deng, M. et al. Simulation and modelling of slip flow over surfaces grafted with polymer brushes and glycocalyx fibers. J. Fluid Mech. 711, 192–211 (2012).

24. 24.

Liu, Q. & Prosperetti, A. Pressure-driven flow in a channel with porous walls. J. Fluid Mech. 679, 77–100 (2011).

25. 25.

Muralidhar, P., Ferrer, N., Daniello, R. J. & Rothstein, J. P. Influence of slip on the flow past superhydrophobic circular cylinders. J. Fluid Mech. 680, 459–476 (2011).

26. 26.

Daniello, R. J., Waterhouse, N. E. & Rothstein, J. P. Drag reduction in turbulent flows over superhydrophobic surfaces. Physics of Fluids 21, 085103 (2009).

27. 27.

Srinivasan, S. et al. Drag reduction for viscous laminar flow on spray-coated non-wetting surfaces. Soft Matter 9, 5691–5702 (2013).

28. 28.

Ming, Z., Jian, L., Chunxia, W., Xiaokang, Z. & Lan, C. Fluid drag reduction on superhydrophobic surfaces coated with carbon nanotube forests (CNTs). Soft Matter 7, 4391–4396 (2011).

29. 29.

Ou, J., Perot, B. & Rothstien, J. P. Laminar drag reduction in microchannels using ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Physics of Fluids 16, 4635–4643 (2004).

30. 30.

Perot, B. & Rothstien, J. P. An analysis of superhydrophobic turbulent drag reduction mechanisms using direct numerical analysis. Physics of Fluids 22, 065102/1–13 (2010).

31. 31.

Joseph, P. et al. Slippage of water past superhydrophobic carbon nanotube forests in microchannels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 156104.1–156104.4 (2006).

32. 32.

Battiato, I. Effective Medium Theory for Drag Reducing Micro-patterned Surfaces in Turbulent Flows. Eur. Phys. J. E 37, 2–5 (2014).

33. 33.

Lanotte, L., Guido, S., Misbah, C., Peyla, P. & Bureau, L. Flow reduction in microchannels coated with a polymer brush. Langmuir 28, 13758–13764 (2012).

34. 34.

Davis, A. M. J. & James, D. F. Slow flow through a model fibrous porous medium. International journal of multiphase flow 22, 969–989 (1996).

35. 35.

Bocquet, L. & Barrat, J. L. Flow boundary conditions from nano- to micro-scales. Soft Matter 3, 685–693 (2007).

36. 36.

Choi, C. H. & Kim, C. J. Large slip of aqueous liquid flow over a nanoengineered superhydrophobic surface. Physical review letters 96, 066001/2–4 (2006).

37. 37.

Watanabe, K., Yanuar, H. & Udagawa, H. Drag reduction of Newtonian fluid in a circular pipe with highly water-repellant wall. J. Fluid Mech. 381, 225–238 (1999).

38. 38.

McHale, G., Shirtcliffe, N. J., Evans, C. R. & Newton, M. I. Terminal velocity and drag reduction measurements on superhydrophobic spheres. Applied Physics Letters 94, 064104/1–6 (2009).

39. 39.

Song, D., Daniello, R. J. & Rothstein, J. P. Drag reduction using superhydrophobic sanded Teflon surfaces. Experiments in fluids 55, 1–8 (2014).

40. 40.

Tretheway, D. C. & Meinhart, C. D. Apparent fluid slip at hydrophobic microchannel walls. Phys. Fluids 14, L9–L12 (2002).

41. 41.

Tretheway, D. C. & Meinhart, C. D. A generating mechanism for apparent fluid slip in hydrophobic microchannels. Phys. Fluids 16, 1509–1515 (2004).

42. 42.

Truesdell, R., Mammoli, A., Vorobieff, P., van Swol, F. & Brinker, C. J. Drag reduction on a patterened superhydrophobic surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 044504/1–4 (2006).

43. 43.

Sbragaglia, M. & Prosperetti, A. Effective velocity boundary condition at a mixed slip surface. J. Fluid Mech. 578, 435–451 (2007).

44. 44.

Feuillebois, F., Bazant, M. Z. & Vinogradova, O. I. Effective slip over superhydrophobic surfaces in thin channels. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 026001/1–5 (2009).

45. 45.

Martell, M. B., Rothstein, J. P. & Perot, J. B. An analysis of superhydrophobic turbulent drag reduction mechanisms using direct numerical simulation. Physics of Fluids 22, 065102/1–13 (2010).

46. 46.

Choi, C. H., Ulmanella, U., Kim, J., Ho, C. M. & Kim, C. J. Effective slip and friction reduction in nanograted superhydrophobic microchannels. Physics of Fluids 18, 087105 (2006).

47. 47.

Koplik, J., Levine, H. & Zee, A. Viscosity renormalization in the Brinkman equation. Phys. Fluids 26, 2864 (1983).

48. 48.

Martys, N. S. & Hagedorn, J. G. Multiscale modeling of fluid transport in heterogeneous materials using discrete Boltzmann methods. Materials and structures 35, 650–658 (2002).

49. 49.

Blevins, R.D. Applied fluid dynamics handbook. (New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1984).

50. 50.

Van den Berg, B. M., Vink, H. & Spaan, J. A. The endothelial glycocalyx protects against myocardial edema. Circ. Res. 92, 592–594 (2003).

51. 51.

Minamiyama, M. In Vivo Microcirculatory Studies: In Vivo Video Images of Microcirculation Part 2. http://www.ne.jp/asahi/minamiya/medicine/ (2000).

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF)- CBET Fluid Dynamics Program under Award No. 1706766. The authors would like to thank Michael Tambasco at Clarkson University for helping in the pressure drop measurements.

Author information

Authors

Contributions

P.M. wrote the main manuscript text, conceived, and supervised the study. Z.W. performed the analytical methods and conducted the experiments. G.A. involved in the project and also contributed to the clarification and editing of the manuscript. All the authors have analyzed the data and have given approval to the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parisa Mirbod.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Mirbod, P., Wu, Z. & Ahmadi, G. Laminar flow drag reduction on soft porous media. Sci Rep 7, 17263 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17141-3

• Accepted:

• Published: