Small RNAs play a regulatory role in many central metabolic processes of bacteria, as well as in developmental processes such as biofilm formation. Small RNAs of Burkholderia cenocepacia, an opportunistic pathogenic beta-proteobacterium, are to date not well characterised. To address that, we performed genome-wide transcriptome structure analysis of biofilm grown B. cenocepacia J2315. 41 unannotated short transcripts were identified in intergenic regions of the B. cenocepacia genome. 15 of these short transcripts, highly abundant in biofilms, widely conserved in Burkholderia sp. and without known function, were selected for in-depth analysis. Expression profiling showed that most of these sRNAs are more abundant in biofilms than in planktonic cultures. Many are also highly abundant in cells grown in minimal media, suggesting they are involved in adaptation to nutrient limitation and growth arrest. Their computationally predicted targets include a high proportion of genes involved in carbon metabolism. Expression and target genes of one sRNA suggest a potential role in regulating iron homoeostasis. The strategy used for this study to detect sRNAs expressed in B. cenocepacia biofilms has successfully identified sRNAs with a regulatory function.
Burkholderia cenocepacia is a member of the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc), a group of closely related beta-proteobacteria1 widely occurring in the environment, particularly in the rhizosphere2. Many Bcc species are also opportunistic pathogens, able to infect cystic fibrosis patients and immunocompromised individuals2,3. Infections with Bcc bacteria are very difficult to treat due to their high innate antimicrobial resistance. Their ability to form biofilms adds to their recalcitrance to antimicrobial treatment4.
Biofilm formation is a highly regulated developmental process, and the post-transcriptional level of regulation plays a large role in this process. In particular, small non-coding regulatory RNAs (sRNAs) have been identified as important factors in the regulatory network of biofilm formation5,6.
sRNAs are typically 50–500 nucleotides in size and can regulate gene expression by interacting with other RNAs or with proteins7,8. Most known sRNAs interact with mRNAs, by incomplete base-pairing to short target sequences, and for this the Hfq protein is required as chaperone9,10. These sRNAs regulate protein expression by altering the rate of translation or of mRNA degradation, and they are usually trans-acting: they interact with multiple targets at distinct genome locations11. B. cenocepacia possesses two Hfq homologues12, suggesting that sRNAs and their mRNA-binding mechanism of regulating protein expression play a role in this bacterium.
B. cenocepacia J2315, like all Bcc bacteria, has a relatively large genome of >8 Mb with a high GC-content (66.9%), with >7200 coding sequences and a large number of mobile genetic elements and genomic islands12. The genome has a multi-replicon structure: the largest replicon (3.87 Mb) harbours most of the major housekeeping genes, whereas the two smaller replicons (3.22 Mb and 0.88 Mb) and the plasmid (0.09) harbour fewer core and more accessory functions such as antibiotic and antifungal production12. The B. cenocepacia J2315 reference genome annotation includes six rRNA operons, 74 tRNAs and 21 other small non-coding RNAs. Among these are tmRNA, RNase P and the signal recognition particle; as well as 14 riboswitches and four catalytic introns12. A number of un-annotated sRNAs have been identified in B. cenocepacia J2315 by RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) and Northern blotting13, by microarray analysis14,15,16, binding to Hfq-protein17, and by computational prediction18.
In a previous study, we investigated the transcriptome structure of B. cenocepacia J2315 biofilms by transcription start site (TSS) mapping using differential RNA-Sequencing (dRNA-Seq)19. For dRNA-Seq, a RNA subsample is treated with a 5′-phosphate dependent exonuclease (Terminator exonuclease, TEX). Native RNAs carry a 5′ triphosphate and are protected from degradation by TEX, RNAs which have been cleaved ( = processed) carry a 5′ monophosphate and are depleted by TEX-treatment. TSS can then be identified in dRNA-Seq data as genome loci with abrupt increase in read coverage, enriched in the +TEX library20 (Fig. 1) compared to untreated RNA. dRNA-Seq could confirm expression of most annotated small RNAs19, showing that short transcripts of B. cenocepacia J2315 are detected with this technique. The dRNA-Seq approach can also detect RNA processing sites. For example, the start of 6 S RNA of B. cenocepacia J2315 was depleted in the +TEX library19, showing that it is processed, as demonstrated for E. coli 6S RNA21.
In the present study, we present a comprehensive analysis of short transcripts located in intergenic regions of the B. cenocepacia J2315 genome, expressed in biofilms, as independently transcribed sRNAs or as part of untranslated regions of mRNA (UTRs).
Identification of independently transcribed sRNAs and of short 5′UTRs
Most known sRNAs are encoded in intergenic regions (IGR), and can also be found in 3′UTRs and 5′UTRs22,23. Therefore all intergenic TSS in B. cenocepacia J2315 were inspected for short transcripts, regardless of position relative to annotated coding sequences (CDS).
To distinguish independently transcribed sRNAs from 5′UTRs of genes and from longer antisense transcripts, the dRNA-Seq dataset was compared to conventional RNA-Seq data (“global” RNA-Seq, gRNA-Seq)19, derived from the same growth condition. Sequences appearing to be short or missing in gRNA-Seq data and without continuous coverage into a 3′-adjacent CDS with the same orientation were reported as sRNAs (Figs 1, S1).
In this manner, 148 TSS for sRNAs were discovered in IGRs of the B. cenocepacia genome (Table S1). 41 of these transcripts were associated with a rho-independent terminator, their lengths ranged from 57 to 514 nt and their average GC-content was 58.8% (excluding the AT-rich stretch of nucleotides following the terminator, Table S2). 86% of these sRNAs have a z-score for minimum folding energy (MFE) <−1 (Fig. 2).
15 RNAs, transcribed in the same orientation as their downstream adjacent genes, and previously classified as sRNAs (based on their differential expression compared to the downstream CDS) in B. cenocepacia 13, B. pseudomallei 24 or B. thailandensis 25 were classified as 5′UTRs in the present study (Table S3).
We investigated the 5′UTRs ncS18 and ncS33, previously described as sRNAs13,19, with 3′ and 5′RACE, to evaluate the proportion of short transcripts compared to full length transcripts derived from their TSS (Fig. 3). Both are highly expressed and appear to be processed. 3′RACE from the 5′UTR towards the CDS resulted exclusively in short sequences which did not extend into the CDS. For ncS33, RACE results indicated two processed species with defined length, for ncS18 the 3′end was less defined (Doc. S1). We used the species associated with the most 3′RACE sequences for structural analysis. ncS18 and ncS33 are both highly structured (Fig. 3), and ncS33 has a negative z-score of −2.5 (Table S3). 5′RACE from within the CDS towards the TSS resulted in short sequences ending near the processing site and in longer sequences extending to the TSS in approximately equal numbers. Both ncS18 and ncS33 are therefore 5′UTRs with a dual nature: 5′end of long mRNA and sRNA. ncS18 was co-regulated with its downstream gene (BCAL2714) across four growth conditions (Fig. S2), while ncS33 was differentially regulated from its downstream gene (BCAM1726, Fig. S2).
Inspection of all 5′UTRs >72 nt (the previously determined average length of 5′UTRs)19 identified 82 5′UTRs which produced short transcripts (Table S3), either due to processing, or to attenuation. Attenuation in this context was defined as marked decrease in coverage in gRNA-Seq data, associated with a terminator structure. For the sake of distinguishing them from sRNAs, they are referred to in this study as “short 5′UTRs”. Their length ranged from to 54 to 607 nt, 58% have a z-score for MFE <−1 (Fig. 2). The GC-content of all short 5′UTRs combined was 62.1%. No correlation was found between GC-content and z-score, for neither group of short transcripts.
Novel candidate regulatory sRNAs highly expressed in biofilms
To identify regulatory sRNAs which could play a role in biofilm formation, independently transcribed sRNAs with a predicted rho-independent terminator and without an open reading frame were further filtered for strong expression (arbitrary cut-off: ≥250 read starts at TSS), low z-score (<−1) and conservation in 13 sequenced Bcc strains. 14 sRNAs fulfilled these criteria and were chosen for more in-depth analysis, these were designated “candidate sRNAs” (Table 1, Fig. 4, Fig. S1). One short transcript, located in a 3′UTR and co-transcribed with its preceding CDS, was also included in this shortlist: sRNAs can be produced from 3′-ends of mRNAs26 and the latter short transcript was characterised by a processing site followed by a strong increase in coverage (Fig. S1). Comparison of candidate sRNAs with the Rfam database resulted in few hits (Table 1) for sRNAs with confirmed expression, none of which conveyed any information about a putative function.
Twelve candidate sRNAs were located on the more conserved replicon 1, all of which were conserved within representatives of the Bcc, the B. pseudomallei group and the B. xenovorans group. Three candidate sRNAs were located on replicon 2, these were less conserved and occurred only within the Bcc and the B. pseudomallei group (Table S2). Most candidate sRNAs were more conserved than directly adjacent intergenic sequences (Fig. 1, Fig. S1).
ncS03, ncS05, ncS27 and ncS62 are homologous sequences (Fig. 5), three of which are very short, consisting almost entirely of two hairpin stem loops. The fourth homologue, ncS27, can be processed into an equally short form. We designated these sRNAs as “double-hairpin RNAs”. Three of these homologues also possess a common upstream motif (Fig. S3), while none of the remaining 11 candidate sRNAs share upstream sequence similarity. Genomes of other Burkholderia sp. all contain three to five homologous double-hairpin RNAs. Seven candidates, including the double hairpin sRNAs, contain one or more CU-rich stretches in unpaired regions of their secondary structure (Figs 4 and 5).
The 5′-end of transcripts is very precisely mapped by dRNA-Seq.19, whereas the 3′-end of RNAs can be identified by an abrupt decrease in coverage at a distinct location only if the transcript is very short and strongly transcribed. Such 3′-ends can only be distinguished from over-represented 5′-ends if the abrupt decrease in coverage occurs at distances from TSS other than the trimmed read length (95 nt). This was the case for 13 of the 15 selected sRNAs. To verify these 3′-ends, and to establish the 3′-ends of candidates not clearly defined in dRNA-Seq data, RACE was performed for eight candidates (Table 1, Doc. S1). Sequenced 3′RACE fragments confirmed dRNA-Seq data and ended downstream of the rho-independent terminator, including the U-rich stretch. ncS06 was shorter than initially predicted, ending at a U-rich stretch which was not preceded by a hairpin structure. The sequence of all candidate sRNAs ended in at least 4, and up to 9 transcribed Us.
Northern Blotting of ten sRNAs largely confirmed size predictions from dRNA-Seq and 3′RACE. An exception was ncS06 which appeared much shorter than predicted by 3′RACE (Fig. 4), indicating processing. The probe used for Northern blotting anneals upstream, and the 3′RACE primer downstream of the processing site (Doc. S2). The probe for ncS25 consistently produced two bands, only the shorter band changed intensity across conditions (Fig. 6) and could be assigned to ncS25 by analysis of a deletion mutant (Fig. 4). Some sRNAs consistently produced more than one band, which can be attributed to processing (Doc. S2) or alternative TSS (ncS54, Fig. S1).
Expression profiles of candidate regulatory sRNAs
Expression of 14 sRNAs from this study was analysed by qPCR. Twelve sRNAs were significantly higher expressed in biofilms than in log phase planktonic cultures (Table 2). Expression was also higher in stationary phase than in exponential phase for seven of these sRNAs. To assess whether quorum sensing (QS) was involved in this upregulation, we investigated sRNA expression in B. cenocepacia J2315 deletion mutant strains with either the one or two homoserine lactone synthases inactivated (ΔcepI andΔcepIΔcciI, respectively)27. However, expression of sRNAs compared to wild type was not altered in these mutant strains (data not shown).
Cultures in exponential phase were exposed to low iron (dipyridyl), membrane stress (SDS), oxidative stress (H2O2), osmotic stress (NaCl) or low pH for 20 min before harvesting for qPCR, to determine if sRNAs expression could be triggered by stress, as has been shown for other sRNAs28. Largely, this short time exposure did not result in significant induction of sRNA expression, although some sRNAs were slightly up-regulated by osmotic or pH stress (Table 2). ncS63 showed a significant and high-fold up-regulation in response to low iron. Its 5′-adjacent gene BCAL2297 is up-regulated to the same fold change, Cq values indicate an overall much lower expression of BCAL2297 in comparison with ncS63, corresponding to their coverage data (Fig. S1, Table S4).
In contrast to the prevailing lack of induction by stress, growth in nutrient depleted medium resulted in increased levels of 12 sRNAs (Table 2), five of these sRNAs were also more abundant in glucose medium. These findings could largely be confirmed by Northern blotting (Fig. 6). Hfq1 was also up-regulated in nutrient depleted medium, and Hfq2 in stationary phase and biofilms (Table 2). Previously, it was already shown that Hfq1 and Hfq2 do not change expression in several stress conditions, e.g. oxidative stress, low pH and low iron29.
Computational target prediction for candidate sRNAs
Putative targets for candidate sRNAs were predicted with CopraRNA, an algorithm which takes accessibility of interaction sites and conservation of putative targets into account. Only regions surrounding the start codon of annotated genes, from 200 nt upstream to 100 nt downstream of the start codon were considered for target prediction, because most confirmed sRNA-mRNA interactions are located in those regions. To evaluate the predictions obtained with the CopraRNA algorithm, they were compared with predictions by RNApredator. RNApredator also takes accessibility of interaction sites into account, but scans the whole CDS plus 200 nt directly up- and downstream of the CDS. In the majority of cases, RNApredator predicted interactions in the same location as CopraRNA (Table S5). The proportion of matching locations was particularly high for the double-hairpin RNAs (>80%).
Target genes predicted by CopraRNA are mainly involved in carbon compound transport and metabolism, transcriptional regulators and cell envelope components such as outer membrane proteins and porins; different functional categories over-represented among targets vary between different sRNAs (Fig. S4, Table S5, Doc. S2). Only one sigma factor, extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor BCAL1947, and no genes involved in QS were present on the target lists. Many mRNAs were present on multiple target lists. A transcriptional regulator (BCAL1948) directly adjacent to above mentioned ECF sigma factor was present on nine sRNA target lists. In particular, ncS11 has extensive sequence complementarity to the coding region of this gene (Doc. S3).
Most predicted targets of double-hairpin RNA fall into categories metabolism and transport of amino acids, carbohydrates and aromatic compounds, e.g. gluconate permease (BCAL3365), galactonate transporter (BCAL0184, BCAM2500), glycerol kinase (BCAL0925), glycerol-phosphate transporter (BCAL3041), 6-phosphogluconolactonase (BCAL3043) and salicylate hydroxylase (BCAM1274). Predicted targets of ncS16 include a higher percentage of outer membrane and cell envelope components, as well as genes for transport of inorganic compounds. The predicted targets of ncS63 include a higher percentage of genes encoding proteins involved in energy production, e.g. succinate dehydrogenase (sdhA, BCAM0969), NADH dehydrogenase subunit B (nuoB, BCAL2343) and cytochrome O ubiquinol oxidase (BCAL2141). Predicted targets of ncS63 are also involved in detoxification of reactive oxygen compounds, e.g. catalase (katB, BCAL3299) and alkyl hydroperoxide reductase subunit F (ahpF, BCAM1216).
Functional categories significantly over-represented were organic acid transport (ncS03, ncS05), glycolysis (ncS62), outer membrane and cell envelope components (ncS16, ncS37), peptidases (ncS06), signal peptides (ncS02, ncS03, ncS37), iron binding (ncS63) and respiration (ncS16, ncS63). For sRNAs with CU-rich sequences in un-paired regions, a high proportion of predicted interactions was located within or overlapping the region 20 nt upstream and downstream of the start of annotated gene starts, with the CU-rich sequence covering the the ribosome binding site (RBS). This is in particular evident for the double-hairpin RNAs, for which 55–80% of predicted interactions fall in this region.
Effect of overexpression and silencing of double-hairpin RNA ncS27
To overexpress the double-hairpin RNA ncS27, the entire sequence of ncS27 was cloned into an expression vector, under the control of an inducible promoter. To silence ncS27, the 5′ end of its sequence, containing the CU-rich region predicted to interact with RBS regions of target genes, was cloned into the same vector in reverse orientation. Overexpression and silencing of ncS27 was investigated in planktonic cells and in biofilms. In planktonic cultures, overexpression of ncS27 attenuated growth (Fig. 5D), whereas silencing of ncS27 had the opposite effect (Fig. 5E). Similarly, respiration rates were attenuated in the overexpression mutant, and enhanced in the silencing mutant (Fig. S5). In biofilms, overexpression or silencing of ncS27 had no significant effect on cell counts and on respiration rate (data not shown).
In the present study, 123 short transcripts expressed in B. cenocepacia J2315 biofilms have been identified and classified into two groups, independently transcribed sRNAs and short 5′UTRs.
Known regulatory sRNAs of other bacterial species tend to be more conserved than the rest of the intergenic region they are encoded in30, and they tend to have a low z-score31. sRNAs often function by binding to the RBS, chaperoned by Hfq, occluding it and thus reducing translation rate; a long stretch of transcribed Us is necessary for sRNA-interaction with Hfq32. Candidate sRNAs of B. cenocepacia show relatively high local conservation and structural significance, and their terminators are followed by a stretch of four to nine Us. The reverse complement of RBS in un-paired regions of some sRNAs makes it possible they act via RBS occlusion; binding to Hfq has been shown for ncS0417. Together, these observations substantiate that sRNAs identified in the present study are plausible candidates for functional sRNAs.
Interestingly, the average GC-content of all identified sRNAs is with 58.8% lower than genome average and also lower than the average for IGRs (63% GC)18 for B. cenocepacia J2315. Structural RNAs (16s rRNA 55.2% GC, 5S rRNA 50.4% GC) and essential small non-coding RNAs (tmRNA 57.3% GC, 6S RNA 56.5% GC) also have a GC-content lower than IGR average. Base composition of RNAs can differ from the rest of the genome in Archaea, and GC-content bias has been used as criterion for sRNA prediction in these cases33. The GC-content bias observed for sRNAs identified in B. cenocepacia could therefore be a further indication that these sRNAs are functional.
Many short 5′UTRs presented in this study likely have a cis-regulatory function. Genes adjacent (3′ end) to the short 5′UTRs identified in B. cenocepacia include homologues of genes known to harbour cis-regulatory structures in other bacterial species, e.g. ribonuclease E34 (BCAL2888), a proline-betaine transporter35 (BCAL1252), ribosomal proteins36 (BCAL0115, BCAL2091, BCAL2765, BCAL2714, BCAL3348), carA 37 (BCAL1260) and tRNA-synthetases36 (BCAL3373, BCAL3436). Attenuation, observed for many short 5′UTRs, is indicative of a cis-regulatory function. Overall, 5′UTRs of B. cenocepacia are an abundant source of short RNAs, and cis-regulatory 5′UTRs seem to be as numerous as in many other bacterial species38. Whether the short 5′UTRs identified in the present study have a further regulatory function in trans, as shown for the irvA gene of Streptococcus mutans 39, is at present unknown.
To obtain a first indication about the possible roles of candidate regulatory sRNAs, computational target prediction was performed. However, the lists of computationally predicted targets are expected to contain a large proportion of false positives, and all targets still need to be experimentally verified. Moreover, it is possible that candidate sRNAs act by a different mechanism which does not involve sequence complementarity to a target; such interactions cannot be detected by computational target prediction.
The high-fold up-regulation of ncS63 specifically in iron-depleted medium, its genome context and predicted target profile suggest that ncS63 could participate in the cellular response to iron depletion and in maintaining iron homeostasis. ncS63 is-co-transcribed with BCAL2297, encoding hemin-uptake protein HemP. HemP features an upstream Fur motif40, which places ncS63 under the regulatory control of the Fur repressor. Many predicted target genes of ncS63 encode for proteins containing iron in the form of heme or iron-sulfur clusters. ncS63 thereby shares characteristics with RyhB, a small RNA under Fur-repression in E. coli 41. RyhB regulates sdhA and other genes involved in respiration, and superoxide dismutase (sodB), while ncS63 targets include sdhA and katB. In addition, genes for iron-containing proteins are enriched in the target lists of RyhB42. ncS63 could therefore be a functional analogue of RyhB, although genome context and secondary structure are different.
The double-hairpin RNAs bear structural similarities to NmsRs, two homologous sRNAs occurring as tandems in the genome of Neisseria meningitidis, a pathogenic beta-proteobacterium43. Both NmsRs contain two CU-rich stretches which are located in unpaired regions of their secondary structure, and which show complementarity to the RBS regions of genes of the tricarbolic acid (TCA) cycle; these genes were also up-regulated in a NmsR double-deletion mutant43. Double-hairpin RNAs occur not in tandem, their up to five homologues are distributed throughout Burkholderia genomes. Similarly, the QS-regulatory sRNAs (Qrrs) of Vibiro sp. occur in up to five distinctly located homologues. Qrrs regulate QS in a base-pairing-dependent manner44, and Qrr1 is located directly adjacent to luxO. ncS62 is located in close proximity to cepI, the major homoserine lactone synthase in Burkholderia sp. Lists of computationally predicted targets for double-hairpin RNAs suggest that they could play a role in regulating transport and metabolism of carbon compounds, in particular of carbohydrates, but sequence complementarity to genes in the TCA cycle or to QS genes was not found.
Most candidate sRNAs were more abundant in conditions with growth arrest and low amino acid availability; factors which also occur in biofilms. Accumulation of sRNAs under nutrient stress, notably amino acid starvation and stringent response, has been described for known sRNAs like Spot 4245 and increased levels of sRNAs in stationary phase cultures are frequently observed46. Increased abundance of sRNA transcripts can be the result of transcription induction as well as relative increase due to protection from degradation, mediated by secondary structure and/or or binding to Hfq. Promoter sequences as well as RNA degradation pathways of B. cenocepacia remain largely uncharacterised. What regulates the observed accumulation of sRNAs in this bacterium is thus yet unknown. Interestingly, the double-hairpin RNAs, predicted to regulate carbohydrate uptake and metabolism, are more abundant in a glucose medium than under starvation, although growth rate was higher in glucose medium than under starvation at point of harvest. It suggests that these sRNAs could have a role in maintaining glucose homeostasis under conditions of amino acid starvation and in reducing phosphosugar stress47. On the other hand, in a medium rich in amino acids overexpression of the double-hairpin RNA ncS27 attenuates growth, which seems to confirm a role in repressing amino acid uptake and metabolism. Expressing the reverse complement of the CU-rich region had the inverse effect of overexpression, which seems to confirm that specifically this region is exerting the regulatory effect of ncS27. A specific role for double-hairpin RNA ncS27 in biofilm formation was not apparent from our results.
Several sRNAs have sequence complementarity with a gene encoding a regulatory protein (BCAL1948), in particular ncS11, with sequence complementarity stretching over 40 nt. ncS11 is strongly up-regulated in stationary phase and biofilms, BCAL1948 is downregulated under these conditions29. The adjacent ECF sigma factor (BCAL1947) is itself a computationally predicted target of sRNAs. This ECF sigma factor is up-regulated in stationary phase, growth under oxygen limiting conditions and in the presence of hydrogen peroxide, conditions which all cause growth arrest29. Whether ncS11 regulates expression of BCAL1948, and whether BCAL1948 regulates expression of the ECF sigma factor is at present unknown. Further studies are under way to confirm sRNA targets and to investigate involvement of sRNAs in regulatory circuits of B. cenocepacia.
Bacterial strains and culturing conditions
Burkholderia cenocepacia J2325 (LMG 16555) was routinely maintained on LB agar (Oxoid). Experiments were performed in LB broth, pH 7, or a phosphate buffered mineral medium29, pH 7, supplemented with yeast extract and peptone or with glucose as required (see below).
Biofilms were grown in LB broth in 96 well microtiter plates and harvested as described before48. Planktonic cells were grown in glass flasks in a shaking incubator at 150 rpm, snap cooled in ice water and harvested by centrifugation at a fixed density of 5 × 108 (log phase cultures) unless otherwise noted. For stress conditions the following compounds were added to log phase cultures in LB medium 20 min prior to harvesting: 0.4 mM 2,2′-dipyridyl (Sigma-Aldrich) for reduced iron availability, 1 M HCl to lower the pH to 5.0, 0.05% H2O2 for oxidative stress, an additional 2% NaCl for osmotic stress, and 0.01% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) for membrane stress. Mineral medium supplemented with 0.06% yeast extract and 0.12% peptone (Bacto peptone, Becton Dickinson) was used to induce growth arrest (to mimic starvation), while mineral medium supplemented with 0.03% yeast extract and 0.03% peptone and 10 mM glucose was used as “glucose medium”.
Late log phase cultures were harvested at a density of 1 × 109 colony forming units (CFU) per ml and stationary phase cultures at a density of 2 × 109 CFU/ml. For condition “starvation”, cells were harvested at 4 × 108 CFU/ml, approx. 1 hour after their optical density had stopped increasing.
Unmarked deletion mutants for the major QS systems of B. cenocepacia (ΔcepI, ΔcepIΔΔcciI) were obtained from Silvia Buroni, Pavia, Italy27, an unmarked deletion mutant of ncS25 was constructed by allelic replacement49 (Table S6).
ncS27 was selected for overexpression and silencing, because it is processed according to dRNA-Seq data (Fig. S1). The processing would remove additional bases from the 5′end introduced by the cloning procedure. An existing vector containing a system for rhamnose-inducible protein expression, pSCrhaB250, was modified for RNA expression; RBS and start codons were removed via inverse PCR. For overexpression, ncS27 was amplified from 3 nt upstream of the start codon until 12 nt downstream of its terminator. For silencing, the reverse complement of the 5′ end of ncS27 was cloned in reverse orientation into the multiple cloning site. Primers used for vector construction and cloning are listed in Table S6. The level of expression from the rhamnose inducible promoter was estimated by qPCR on cultures harvested in exponential growth phase at O.D.595 0.5.
Growth curves for overexpression and silencing mutants were monitored with a Cell Growth Quantifier (Aquila Biosystems), which measures the intensity of backscattered light every 30 s. Cells were grown in LB broth supplemented with 600 µg/ml trimethoprim and 0.2% rhamnose in a shaking incubator at 100 rpm. Respiration rates were measured in microtiter plates using a resazurin-based method (CellTiter-Blue, Promega)51. For planktonic growth, cell densities were normalised to 5 × 108 CFU per well and fluorescence (λex: 560 nm and λem:590 nm) was measured every 10 min in a plate reader (Envision, PerkinElmer). Cell counts in biofilms were determined by conventional plating.
RNA was extracted using the RiboPure bacteria kit (Invitrogen), using the standard protocol, except that the proportion of ethanol added to crude extract prior to clean-up was increased to 1.25x to retain more small RNAs. Before DNase treatment, RNA was denatured by heating to 65 °C for 5 min and DNase incubation time was increased to 60 min. Total RNA quality and relative quantity of small RNAs in the extract was analysed with the Experion system (Bio-Rad) using StandSens chips.
RNA-Sequencing and transcription start site annotation
Differential RNA-Sequencing (dRNA-Seq), global RNA-Sequencing (gRNA-Seq) and transcription start site (TSS) annotation was described previously19, using the most recent genome annotation12 with accession numbers AM747720, AM747721, AM747722, and AM747723. Array Express accession numbers for dRNA-Seq and gRNA-Seq data are E-MTAB-3381 and E-MTAB-2079.
3′ and 5′ RACE
5′RACE was performed as previously described19, using the 5′RACE System from Invitrogen. cDNA was generated from total RNA using a gene specific primer (GSP1) and then poly(C)-tailed using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. cDNA was then amplified using a nested gene specific primer (GSP2) and the abridged anchor primer from the 5′RACE system.
For 3′RACE, total RNA was first poly(A)-tailed (Poly(A) Polymerase Tailing Kit, Epicentre). cDNA was generated using the 3´RACE System from Invitrogen, with an oligo d(T) adapter primer. cDNA was then amplified using a gene specific primer (GSP3) and the abridged universal amplification primer which anneals to the adapter part of the oligo d(T) primer from the kit. Where possible, PCR products were re-amplified with nested primers (GSP4). Primer sequences are listed in Table S6.
PCR products were cloned using the pGEM vector system (Promega). Between four and seven plasmid inserts were sequenced per analysis. Alignments of all RACE results are presented in Doc. S1.
Coverage of dRNA- and gRNA-Seq data was visualised with the Integrated Genome Browser52. Sequence conservation of intergenic regions were visualised using pre-computed whole-genome alignments of 8 genome-sequenced Burkholderia sp. of the Vista synteny viewer53 via the Integrated Microbial Genomes database54. Strains are listed in Fig. S1.
The mfold web server was used for RNA secondary structure prediction55. The Rfam database56 was used to search for homologues with known function. Rho-independent terminators were predicted with TransTermHP57, using the–all-context command line option to predict terminators independently from annotations. Sequence motifs in upstream sequences were searched for using MEME58. sRNA homolology searches were conducted using BLASTn59, with adjusted input parameters (word size: 7, Match/Mismatch Scores 1/−1, Gap existence cost -0, gap extension cost: 2) and with 65% query coverage and 60% sequence similarity cut-offs. Genome-sequenced strains included in BLASTn searches are listed in Table S2. Putative sRNA targets were predicted with CopraRNA42, and with RNApredator60. Input strains for CopraRNA are listed in Table S5. CopraRNA output is a list of 100 targets with the smallest p-values, present in at least 50% of input strains. The RNApredator output is a list of one interaction for each annotated gene, 7116 interactions for each sRNA. Functional enrichment analysis, based on the DAVID tool61, is incorporated in CopraRNA.
z-scores for MFE were calculated using 1000 randomly mononucleotide-shuffled sequences (CLC Genomics Workbench v. 8.5.1). The z-score is the number of standard deviations (σ) the MFE of the actual sequence (x) deviates from the mean MFE (μ) of shuffled sequences, (x − μ)/σ.
Pre-cast 10% polyacrylamide TBE-urea gels (Bio-Rad) were loaded with 5 µg total RNA per lane. RNA samples were mixed with TBE-urea sample buffer (Bio-Rad) and denatured at 90 °C for 5 min. On each gel, two RNA ladders were run alongside: 0.1–2 kb RNA ladder (Invitrogen) and a small RNA marker (Abnova, fragment sizes 20 to 100 bases). Gels were run for 1 to 1.5 hours at 80 V. Before blotting, lanes containing RNA ladders were cut off the gel, stained with GelRed (Biotium), and the band position documented for later RNA size estimation.
RNA was blotted onto positively charged nylon membranes (Roche) in a Mini Trans-Blot Electrophoretic Transfer cell (Bio-Rad) for 1 hour at 300 mA, then cross-linked with UV-light. 5′DIG-labelled probes were obtained from Sigma. Membranes were hybridised at 42 °C overnight at 8 rpm, with 100 ng/ml DIG-labelled probes (Table S6) in ULTRA-Hyb-Oligo hybridisation buffer (Ambion). Membrane washing and immunological detection of probes was performed using the DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set and the DIG Luminescent Detection Kit (Roche). Luminescence was recorded with BioMax Light X-ray films (Carestream). Membranes were stripped using 0.5% SDS at 60 °C for one hour and re-used for hybridisation. Northern blots were conducted in triplicate, using RNA isolated from three independent biological replicates.
Quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR)
cDNA was generated from 500 ng RNA using the qScript cDNA Synthesis kit (Quanta Biosciences). qPCR was performed in a Bio-Rad CFX96 Real-Time System C1000 Thermal Cycler using GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega). Every sample was run in two technical replicates, and no-template- and no-RT controls were included for every primer pair. Cq values were normalised against two control genes with minimal expression changes across all tested conditions for data normalisation: BCAM0918, (encoding RNA polymerase D) and BCAL2367 (encoding a transcriptional regulator). Primer sequences are listed in Table S6.
Fold changes were calculated compared to a standard (mix of all cDNAs in experiment) and log-transformed. Normality of distribution was tested with a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and changes in expression were analysed by One-Way ANOVA with a Tukey Post-hoc test using SPSS statistics v. 24 (IBM). Cq values are listed in Table S4.
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article, as supplementary information files. Raw dRNA-Seq and gRNA-Seq data are available under Array Express accession numbers E-MTAB-3381 and E-MTAB-2079.
Depoorter, E. et al. Burkholderia: an update on taxonomy and biotechnological potential as antibiotic producers. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100, 5215–5229 (2016).
Mahenthiralingam, E., Urban, T. A. & Goldberg, J. B. The multifarious, multireplicon Burkholderia cepacia complex. Nat Rev Microbiol 3, 144–156 (2005).
LiPuma, J. J. Update on the Burkholderia cepacia complex. Curr Opin Pulm Med 11, 528–533 (2005).
Coenye, T. Social interactions in the Burkholderia cepacia complex: biofilms and quorum sensing. Future Microbiol 5, 1087–1099 (2010).
Chambers, J. R. & Sauer, K. Small RNAs and their role in biofilm formation. Trends Microbiol 21, 39–49 (2013).
Van Puyvelde, S., Steenackers, H. P. & Vanderleyden, J. Small RNAs regulating biofilm formation and outer membrane homeostasis. RNA Biol 10, 185–191 (2013).
Desnoyers, G., Bouchard, M. P. & Massé, E. New insights into small RNA-dependent translational regulation in prokaryotes. Trends Genet 29, 92–98 (2013).
Michaux, C., Verneuil, N., Hartke, A. & Giard, J. C. Physiological roles of small RNA molecules. Microbiology 160, 1007–1019 (2014).
Storz, G., Vogel, J. & Wassarman, K. M. Regulation by Small RNAs in bacteria: expanding frontiers. Molecular Cell 43, 880–891 (2011).
Vogel, J. & Luisi, B. F. Hfq and its constellation of RNA. Nat Rev Microbiol 9, 578–589 (2011).
Beisel, C. L. & Storz, G. Base pairing small RNAs and their roles in global regulatory networks. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34 (2010).
Holden, M. T. G. et al. The genome of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315, an epidemic pathogen of cystic fibrosis patients. J Bacteriol 91, 261–277 (2009).
Yoder-Himes, D. R. et al. Mapping the Burkholderia cenocepacia niche response via high-throughput sequencing. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 3976–3981 (2009).
Coenye, T. et al. Molecular mechanisms of chlorhexidine tolerance in Burkholderia cenocepacia biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55, 1912–1919 (2011).
Drevinek, P. et al. Gene expression changes linked to antimicrobial resistance, oxidative stress, iron depletion and retained motility are observed when Burkholderia cenocepacia grows in cystic fibrosis sputum. BMC Infect Dis 8, 121 (2008).
Peeters, E., Sass, A., Mahenthiralingam, E., Nelis, H. & Coenye, T. Transcriptional response of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 sessile cells to treatments with high doses of hydrogen peroxide and sodium hypochlorite. BMC Genomics 11, 90 (2010).
Ramos, C. G., Grilo, A. M., da Costa, P. J. P. & Leitão, J. H. Experimental identification of small non-coding regulatory RNAs in the opportunistic human pathogen Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315. Genomics 101, 139–148 (2013).
Coenye, T. et al. Identification of putative noncoding RNA genes in the Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 genome. FEMS Microbiol Lett 276, 83–92 (2007).
Sass, A. M. et al. Genome-wide transcription start site profiling in biofilm-grown Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315. BMC Genomics 16, 775 (2015).
Sharma, C. M. & Vogel, J. Differential RNA-seq: the approach behind and the biological insight gained. Current Opin Microbiol 19, 97–105 (2014).
Kim, K. S. & Lee, Y. Regulation of 6S RNA biogenesis by switching utilization of both sigma factors and endoribonucleases. Nucleic Acids Res 32, 6057–6068 (2004).
Kawano, M., Reynolds, A. A., Miranda-Rios, J. & Storz, G. Detection of 5′- and 3′-UTR-derived small RNAs and cis-encoded antisense RNAs in Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res 33, 1040–1050 (2005).
Miyakoshi, M., Chao, Y. & Vogel, J. Regulatory small RNAs from the 3′ regions of bacterial mRNAs. Curr Opin Microbiol 24, 132–139 (2015).
Khoo, J. S., Chai, S. F., Mohamed, R., Nathan, S. & Firdaus-Raih, M. Computational discovery and RT-PCR validation of novel Burkholderia conserved and Burkholderia pseudomallei unique sRNAs. BMC Genomics 13(Suppl 7), S13 (2012).
Stubben, C. J. et al. Differential expression of small RNAs from Burkholderia thailandensis in response to varying environmental and stress conditions. BMC Genomics 15, 385 (2014).
Chao, Y. et al. In vivo cleavage map illuminates the central role of RNase E in coding and non-coding RNA pathways. Mol Cell 65, 39–51 (2017).
Udine, C. et al. Phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315 mutants affected in homoserine lactone and diffusible signal factor-based quorum sensing systems suggests interplay between both types of systems. PLoS One 8, e55112 (2013).
Gottesman, S. et al. Small RNA regulators and the bacterial response to stress. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 71, 1–11 (2006).
Sass, A. M. et al. The unexpected discovery of a novel low-oxygen-activated locus for the anoxic persistence of Burkholderia cenocepacia. ISME J 7, 1568–1581 (2013).
Tsai, C. H., Liao, R., Chou, B., Palumbo, M. & Contreras, L. M. Genome-wide analyses in bacteria show small-RNA enrichment for long and conserved intergenic regions. J Bacteriol 197, 40–50 (2015).
Clote, P., Ferre, F., Kranakis, E. & Krizanc, D. Structural RNA has lower folding energy than random RNA of the same dinucleotide frequency. RNA 11, 578–591 (2005).
Sauer, E. & Weichenrieder, O. Structural basis for RNA 3′-end recognition by Hfq. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 13065–13070 (2011).
Klein, R. J., Misulovin, Z. & Eddy, S. R. Noncoding RNA genes identified in AT-rich hyperthermophiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99, 7542–7547 (2002).
Diwa, A., Bricker, A. L., Jain, C. & Belasco, J. G. An evolutionarily conserved RNA stem–loop functions as a sensor that directs feedback regulation of RNase E gene expression. Genes Dev 14, 1249–1260 (2000).
Lim, B. & Lee, K. Stability of the osmoregulated promoter-derived proP mRNA is posttranscriptionally regulated by RNase III in. Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 197, 1297–1305 (2015).
Livny, J. & Waldor, M. K. Mining regulatory 5′UTRs from cDNA deep sequencing datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 38, 1504–1514 (2010).
Butcher, B. G., Chakravarthy, S., D’Amico, K., Stoos, K. B. & Filiatrault, M. J. Disruption of the carA gene in Pseudomonas syringae results in reduced fitness and alters motility. BMC Microbiol 16, 194 (2016).
Mellin, J. R. & Cossart, P. Unexpected versatility in bacterial riboswitches. Trends Genet 31, 150–156 (2015).
Liu, N. et al. The Streptococcus mutans irvA gene encodes a trans-acting riboregulatory mRNA. Mol Cell 57, 179–190 (2015).
Yuhara, S. et al. Pleiotropic roles of iron-responsive transcriptional regulator Fur in Burkholderia multivorans. Microbiology 154, 1763–1774 (2008).
Massé, E. & Gottesman, S. A small RNA regulates the expression of genes involved in iron metabolism in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci US 99, 4620–4625 (2002).
Wright, P. R. et al. Comparative genomics boosts target prediction for bacterial small RNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, E3487–3496 (2013).
Pannekoek, Y. et al. Neisseria meningitidis uses sibling small regulatory RNAs to switch from cataplerotic to anaplerotic metabolism. mBio 8, e02293–02216 (2017).
Lenz, D. H. et al. The small RNA chaperone Hfq and multiple small RNAs control quorum sensing in Vibrio harveyi and Vibrio cholerae. Cell 118, 69–82 (2004).
Bækkedal, C. & Haugen, P. The Spot 42 RNA: A regulatory small RNA with roles in the central metabolism. RNA Biol 12, 1071–1077 (2015).
Vogel, J. et al. RNomics in Escherichia coli detects new sRNA species and indicates parallel transcriptional output in bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 6435–6443 (2003).
Papenfort, K. & Vogel, J. Small RNA functions in carbon metabolism and virulence of enteric pathogens. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4 (2014).
Van Acker, H. et al. The BCESM genomic region contains a regulator involved in quorum sensing and persistence in Burkholderia cenocepacia J2315. Future Microbiol 9, 845–860 (2014).
Hamad, M. A., Skeldon, A. M. & Valvano, M. A. Construction of aminoglycoside-sensitive Burkholderia cenocepacia strains for use in studies of intracellular bacteria with the gentamicin protection assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 76, 3170–3176 (2010).
Cardona, S. T. & Valvano, M. A. An expression vector containing a rhamnose-inducible promoter provides tightly regulated gene expression in Burkholderia cenocepacia. Plasmid 54, 219–228 (2005).
Peeters, E., Nelis, H. J. & Coenye, T. Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates. J Microbiol Methods 72, 157–165 (2008).
Freese, N. H. et al. Integrated genome browser: visual analytics platform for genomics. Bioinformatics 32, 2089–2095 (2017).
Frazer, K. A., Pachter, L., Poliakov, A., Rubin, E. M. & Dubchak, I. VISTA: computational tools for comparative genomics. Nucleic Acids Res 32, W273–279 (2004).
Markowitz, V. M. et al. Ten years of maintaining and expanding a microbial genome and metagenome analysis system. Trends Microbiol 23, 730–741 (2015).
Zuker, M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 3406–3415 (2003).
Nawrocki, E. P. et al. Rfam 12.0: updates to the RNA families database. Nucleic Acids Res 43 (2017).
Kingsford, C. L., Ayanbule, K. & Salzberg, S. L. Rapid, accurate, computational discovery of Rho-independent transcription terminators illuminates their relationship to DNA uptake. Genome Biol 8, R22 (2007).
Bailey, T. L. et al. The MEME Suite. Nucleic Acids Res 43 (2017).
Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25, 3389–3402 (1997).
Eggenhofer, F., Tafer, H., Stadler, P. F. & Hofacker, I. L. RNApredator: fast accessibility-based prediction of sRNA targets. Nucleic Acids Res 3, W149–W154 (2011).
Huang, D. W., Sherman, B. T. & Lempicki, R. A. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc 4, 44–57 (2008).
Kimelman, A. et al. A vast collection of microbial genes that are toxic to bacteria. Genome Res 22, 802–809 (2012).
This work was supported by the Belgian Science Policy Office (Belspo) through the Interuniversity Attraction Pole Program.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Cite this article
Sass, A., Kiekens, S. & Coenye, T. Identification of small RNAs abundant in Burkholderia cenocepacia biofilms reveal putative regulators with a potential role in carbon and iron metabolism. Sci Rep 7, 15665 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15818-3
This article is cited by
Identification of Burkholderia cenocepacia non-coding RNAs expressed during Caenorhabditis elegans infection
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (2023)
In silico prediction and expression profile analysis of small non-coding RNAs in Herbaspirillum seropedicae SmR1
BMC Genomics (2020)