The rise of antimicrobial resistant microorganisms constitutes an increasingly serious threat to global public health. As a consequence, the efficacy of conventional antimicrobials is rapidly declining, threatening the ability of healthcare professionals to cure common infections. Over the last two decades host defense peptides have been identified as an attractive source of new antimicrobials. In the present study, we characterized the antibacterial and mechanistic properties of D-Cateslytin (D-Ctl), a new epipeptide derived from L-Cateslytin, where all L-amino acids were replaced by D-amino acids. We demonstrated that D-Ctl emerges as a potent, safe and robust peptide antimicrobial with undetectable susceptibility to resistance. Using Escherichia coli as a model, we reveal that D-Ctl targets the bacterial cell wall leading to the permeabilization of the membrane and the death of the bacteria. Overall, D-Ctl offers many assets that make it an attractive candidate for the biopharmaceutical development of new antimicrobials either as a single therapy or as a combination therapy as D-Ctl also has the remarkable property to potentiate several antimicrobials of reference such as cefotaxime, amoxicillin and methicillin.


The discovery of antimicrobials to treat infectious diseases is one of the greatest achievements of modern medicine. However, excessive and inappropriate use of antimicrobials fosters the emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms. Indeed, infections caused by antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms also known as “superbugs” often no longer respond to conventional treatments, thereby extending the duration of the disease related to infection and even lead to patient death1,2. Antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms, including multidrug-resistant types, are often responsible for healthcare-associated infections and constitute a serious threat to public health worldwide, specifically among vulnerable populations such as critically ill patients3. Infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria are a particular concern for public health because these microorganisms are so versatile that they can exchange genetic material and rapidly deploy an arsenal of resistance mechanisms, particularly under selective pressure4. Especially, this phenomenon resulted in a drastic increase in the prevalence of Escherichia coli multidrug-resistant (E. coli MDR) strains and the onset of healthcare-associated urinary tract or bloodstream infections5,6,7,8.

Novel classes of antimicrobials were rare in the past thirty years and of sharp administration. Specifically, the discovery of fluoroquinolones in the 1970s brought to an end the portfolio of antimicrobials against Gram-negative bacteria9. Nevertheless, antimicrobial therapy remains the prophylactic and curative practice most commonly used to fight against infections in the city and the hospital. However, due to the emergence of selected antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms and the lack of new antimicrobials on the market, we are now facing the possibility of a future without effective antimicrobials for treating bacterial infections. As a consequence, there is a persisting and urgent medical need to develop new antibacterial compounds.

Over the last two decades, host defence peptides (HDPs) have emerged as new attractive candidates in the development of novel anti-bacterial treatments, specifically for antimicrobial-resistant infections10. The benefits of using HDPs are that they act by disrupting the bacterial membranes, a mechanism that is fast and non-specific. Therefore bacteria are not prone to develop high-level resistance towards these compounds in the same extent as towards conventional antimicrobials11. Moreover they display a broad-spectrum of pathogens, including multidrug resistant Gram-positive and negative bacteria12. HDPs are usually rather short (12–50 amino acids), cationic and amphiphilic with a broad diversity in their secondary structure and well preserved during evolution. HDPs are naturally present in tissues frequently exposed to pathogens, such as the skin, lungs, and gastrointestinal tract. Besides their broad spectrum of antimicrobial properties, they also exhibit significant immunomodulatory effects13.

Among all isolated and characterized HDPs, Cateslytin (Ctl) constitutes an excellent candidate for the development of a new class of antimicrobials. Indeed, Ctl is short and linear (15 amino acids) and therefore very easy to synthesize for a minimal cost. Moreover, it is stable at high temperature and low pH. Ctl results from the proteolysis of chromogranin A, an acidic protein stored in the secretory vesicles of numerous neuroendocrine and immune cells and is released upon stress in most of the body fluids14,15,16,17. In addition to its antibacterial properties, Ctl is also a potent antifungal agent18,19.

In the present study, we report the biological characterization of D-Ctl, a new epipeptide derived from L-Ctl, where all L-amino acids were replaced by D-amino acids (patent application: EP16 306539.4). Using various approaches including microbiology (broth microdilution assays), cell biology (viability and cytokine release assays) and microscopy (atomic force microscopy, epiflorescence microscopy, ATR-FTIR spectroscopy), we characterized the biological and mechanical properties of D-Ctl compared to its conformer L-Ctl. Overall, D-Ctl emerges as a potent, safe and stable antimicrobial that damages bacterial cell walls and still not suffer of any microbial resistance.


D-Ctl is an efficient antimicrobial agent against various bacterial strains

One of the downfalls of the use of therapeutic peptides relies on their lack of proteolytic stability towards proteases. One way of controlling the stability of a therapeutic peptide is to synthesize its epimer, which has the same sequence as the parent peptide with all levogyre (L) amino acids replaced by dextrogyre (D) amino acids. Such peptides are more resistant to proteolysis, hence increasing their half-lives and bioavailability. Therefore, we synthesized D-Ctl and compared its respective antibacterial efficiency with L-Ctl. To this aim, we used a panel of Gram-negative strains: Escherichia coli wild type, Escherichia coli multidrug resistant (E. coli MDR), Prevotella intermedia, Fusobacterium nucleatum and Gram-positive strains: Staphylococcus aureus Methicillin Sensitive (MSSA), Staphylococcus aureus Methicillin Resistant (MRSA), Parvimonas micra. This panel includes facultative and strict anaerobes (Table 1 ). The antibacterial activity of D-Ctl versus L-Ctl was assessed by the measurement of their MIC (Minimal Inhibitory Concentration) defined as the lowest concentration of peptide able to inhibit 100% of the inoculum. Depending on the bacterial species, the MIC of D-Ctl ranged between 8 and 24 μg/mL (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S1 ). D-Ctl was specifically efficient against P. intermedia with a MIC of 10 μg/mL and E. coli with a MIC of 8.0 μg/mL for E. coli wild type and 8.4 μg/mL for E. coli MDR. Overall, the MIC of D-Ctl was 2 to 18 times lower than the one of L-Ctl (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S1 ).

Table 1 Antibacterial activity of D-Ctl compared to L-Ctl.

We then compared the MIC of D-Ctl with the MIC of antimicrobials of reference. Interestingly, the antimicrobial activity of D-Ctl on E. coli was comparable to that of ampicillin and kanamycin and could therefore constitute an alternative treatment for E. coli infections (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S2 ). Regarding the others species tested, the antimicrobials of reference were still more efficient than D-Ctl (Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S2 ).

D-Ctl is a potentiator for numerous antimicrobials of reference

We then investigated whether D-Ctl could potentiate the antibacterial effect of several antimicrobials of reference, specifically methicillin and vancomycin extensively prescribed to treat S. aureus infections, amoxicillin recommended in numerous infections including periodontal infections and cefotaxime often used as second intention treatment against E. coli resistant strains. According to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing20, the effect of a combination between two antibacterial compounds can be evaluated by their FICI (Fractional Inhibitory Concentration Index). The FICI consists of the sum of the FICs of both antibacterial agents: FIC index = FICantimicrobial + FICD-Ctl. For each compound, the FIC was determined as the ratio between the MIC of the compound in combination (MICcombination) and the MIC of the compound acting alone (MICalone). On the basis of their FIC index, each combination was categorized as synergistic (≤0.5), additive (>0.5 to 1), indifferent (>1 to <4) or antagonistic (≥4).

For each strain, the MICs of D-Ctl and the antimicrobial of reference were evaluated (MICalone) (Table 2 and Supplementary Figures S1 and S2 ). Then, different combinations of D-Ctl and the antimicrobial of reference were tested in order to determine the MICcombination. The FICI was then calculated as described above. We observed a synergistic effect between D-Ctl and amoxicillin for P. micra and P. intermedia and an additive effect for D-Ctl and cefotaxime, methicillin and amoxicillin on E. coli MDR, MSSA and F. nucleatum, respectively (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S3 ). Regarding MRSA, no potentiator effect was highlighted between D-Ctl and methicillin (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S3 ). Altogether, D-Ctl also emerges as an effective potentiator for several antimicrobials currently prescribed in clinic to fight severe bacterial infections.

Table 2 Antibacterial activity of D-Ctl in combination with conventional antimicrobials.

Unlike ampicillin and cefotaxime, D-Ctl does not trigger resistance in E. coli

To assess whether E. coli would develop resistance under a selective pressure, we cultured E. coli wild type in the presence of sub-MIC concentrations of D-Ctl (½ MIC), ampicillin or cefotaxime for 24 days. Interestingly, E. coli failed to generate mutants of resistance as its MIC remained stable for the whole duration of the culture (Fig. 1 ). In contrast, the MICs of ampicillin and cefotaxime, two antimicrobials of reference used to treat E. coli infections, rapidly increase over the course of the culture to reach 3x MIC at day 24 (Fig. 1 ).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Resistance acquisition assay of E. coli in the presence of D-Ctl compared to ampicillin and cefotaxime. The E. coli wild-type strain was cultured in the presence of ½ MIC of the antibacterial agent for 24 days. The fold change in MIC was evaluated at the indicated days.

D-Ctl is not cytotoxic and does not elicit cytokine release

In order to investigate whether D-Ctl would be a good lead compound for the development of a new antimicrobial, we assessed several safety issues such as its haemolytic activity, cytotoxicity and immunogenicity through cytokine release.

One of the major side effects of conventional antimicrobials, but also several HDPs, is to alter the intestinal homeostasis by damaging the intestinal epithelial barrier21. To verify whether D-Ctl affects the integrity of the intestine epithelium, we assessed the cytotoxicity of D-Ctl towards Caco-2 cells, a human intestinal epithelial cell line. As shown in Fig. 2A, no cytotoxicity was measured after 72 hours of incubation with neither D-Ctl nor L-Ctl at concentrations up to 100 μg/mL.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Cytotoxicity assays of D-Ctl and L-Ctl. The cytotoxicity of D-Ctl and L-Ctl on Caco-2, a human intestinal epithelial cell line (A) and PMBCs (C and D) was assessed at the indicated concentrations for 72 hours. Red blood cells haemolysis was evaluated after a one-hour treatment with the indicated concentrations of D-Ctl or L-Ctl (B). Each figure corresponds to a mean of at least two independent experiments.

In order to be administered as a systemic therapy, antimicrobials should not interfere with blood cells homeostasis. Subsequently, we assessed whether D-Ctl was toxic towards human erythrocytes but also human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). For haemolytic assays, D-Ctl or L-Ctl was incubated with human erythrocytes at concentrations ranging from 0 to 100 μg/mL. No cell lysis was observed at all, demonstrating that neither D-Ctl nor L-Ctl is haemolytic, even at concentrations higher than its MICs (Fig. 2B ). Similarly, no cytotoxicity was detected in PBMCs following an exposure of 72 hours with D-Ctl or L-Ctl at concentrations up to 100 μg/mL (Fig. 2C and D ).

In addition, an antimicrobial drug candidate should not trigger immunogenicity. To verify whether D-Ctl influences the immune system, we performed a cytokine release assay. To this aim, human PBMCs were treated with D-Ctl for 24 hours and cytokines were quantified after 24 hours in the cell supernatant using the Bio-Plex® technology (Bio-Rad). As indicated in Fig. 3A and B, no significant cytokine release was observed following D-Ctl or L-Ctl treatment. As a control, PBMCs were treated with LPS in the same conditions, resulting in the release of a broad spectrum of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNFα, G-CSF and IFNγ but also the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 (Fig. 3C ). This result indicates that neither D-Ctl nor L-Ctl is associated with major cytokine release.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Cytokine release assay following treatment of PBMCs with D-Ctl or L-Ctl. Cells from healthy volunteers were treated with D-Ctl (A), L-Ctl (B) or LPS (C) for 24 hours and the indicated cytokines levels were evaluated in the cell supernatant using the Bio-Plex® technology.

D-Ctl is more resistant to degradation by secreted bacterial proteases than L-Ctl

Linear L-peptides with α-helical structures are usually susceptible to proteolysis. As an example, V8 and aureolysin, two proteases secreted by S. aureus are responsible for the cleavage of the host defence peptide LL-37 and therefore contribute to bacterial survival22. The specific spatial configurations of the cleavage sites for these enzymes are not present in D-peptides although these peptides might be cleaved by non-specific hydrolysis during enzymatic digestion. Subsequently, we assessed the sensitivity of D-Ctl to secreted bacterial proteases by HPLC. To this aim, different bacterial supernatants were incubated with D-Ctl (or L-Ctl as a control) for 24 hours at 37 °C. As depicted in Fig. 4, D-Ctl was not degraded in none of the bacterial supernatants tested (Fig. 4B,D,F,H,J,K and L ). In contrast, L-Ctl was degraded in the presence of secreted proteases from E. coli wild type (Fig. 4A ) and MDR (Fig. 4C ) but not F. nucleatum (Fig. 4E ), P. intermedia (Fig. 4G ) and P. micra (Fig. 4I ). Of interest, in a previous study, we demonstrated that L-Ctl was also stable in the supernatant of MSSA and MRSA18. Consequently, the change in conformation between L-Ctl and D-Ctl does not affect their sensitivity towards secreted bacterial proteases, except for E. coli wild type and MDR.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Stability of D-Ctl and L-Ctl towards proteases secreted by different bacterial strains. Supernatants from E. coli wild type (A and B), E. coli MDR (C and D), F. nucleatum (E and F), P. intermedia (G and H), P. micra (I and J), S. aureus methicillin sensitive (MSSA) (K), S. aureus methicillin resistant (MRSA) (L) were incubated with D-Ctl or L-Ctl, as indicated, for 24 hours. Peptide stability was then assessed by HPLC. Chromatograms 1 correspond to supernatant only, chromatograms 2 correspond to supernatant and peptide and chromatograms 3 corresponds to peptide only.

D-Ctl dramatically damaged the cell wall of E. coli MDR

To have a first insight on the mechanism of action of both peptides, suspensions of E. coli MDR (DO600 = 0.1, ~6 × 106 bacteria/mL) were subjected or not (as a control experiment) to the action of L-Ctl and D-Ctl during 20 hours at several initial concentrations (0.05x MIC, 1x MIC, 5x MIC, and 10x MIC). Figure 5(a and g) shows the infrared spectra of the bacteria cultivated in LB and LB/4 media without peptide. The spectral fingerprints are characteristic of live bacteria23. In LB/4, the additional biosynthesis of glycogen can be observed (red arrows, Fig. 5g) probably due to a lack of some nutrients with respect to carbon24. The corresponding epifluorescence images (next to the infrared spectra) after BacLightTM staining show a green fluorescence suggesting intact cell membranes. The average elasticity assessed by AFM force measurements was 310 ± 71 kPa (Fig. 6 ) that was in line with previous data obtained on the same strain25.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Spectral fingerprints of E. coli MDR. Left panel: IR-ATR spectra of planktonic E. coli MDR incubated with or without L and D conformers of Ctl during 20 hours. The spectra are normalized to one with respect to the Amide II band. Offsets of spectra are used for clarity. Right panel: Corresponding representative epifluorescence images of E. coli MDR after incubation with or without L and D conformers of Ctl during 20 hours. Bar: 20 µm.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Elasticity of E. coli MDR treated with D-Ctl or L-Ctl for 20 hours. *And **refer to data obtained after only 3 hours and 0.8 hours of treatment, respectively. Bars for L-Ctl correspond to the average elasticity of bacteria subjected to antimicrobial peptide treatments performed at concentrations of 8, 150 and 750 µg/mL, respectively. For D-Ctl, the bars correspond to the average elasticity of bacteria subjected to the peptide at concentrations of 8, 40 and 150 µg/mL, respectively.

At 8 µg/mL for both enantiomers, the infrared spectral features were very similar to those recorded for the untreated bacteria (Fig. 5a,b and c ), suggesting that the metabolic activity of the bacteria was not or poorly modified. However, some differences in the corresponding epifluorescence images were observed. Whereas bacteria treated by L-Ctl showed only a green fluorescence, those treated with D-Ctl at the same concentration showed some green bacteria but also a lot of orange/red bacteria. This result suggested that the membranes of the bacteria were not damaged by L-Ctl but were damaged by D-Ctl for a lot of bacteria. The mechanical properties of the bacteria reported in Fig. 6 showed that L-Ctl did not significantly impact the cell wall elasticity (320 ± 46 kPa). Consequently, the integrity of the bacterial membrane was preserved in spite of the presence of L-Ctl, in accordance with the epifluorescence results. Conversely, the treatment with D-Ctl at the same concentration dramatically reduced by a factor of 3.7 the average elasticity of the bacterial cell wall (83 ± 48 kPa). This loss of elasticity suggested that D-Ctl strongly damaged the bacterial membrane as it was already reported in the literature for other antimicrobial peptides26,27,28. These results emphasized that the action of the two enantiomers were very different at the same concentration. Whereas D-Ctl showed a very strong activity against E. coli MDR, this was not the case for L-Ctl. Indeed, for the latter the concentration was only 0.05x MIC instead of MIC for D-Ctl.

When the bacteria were treated at the MIC of L-Ctl (150 μg/mL), the infrared spectrum of the bacteria left after the treatment was very similar to the one of the non-treated bacteria (Fig. 5a and d ). This result suggested that as for D-Ctl at the MIC, the treatment with L-Ctl at the MIC did not or slightly modify the bacterial metabolism. The epifluorescence images after BacLightTM staining show a mixture of green and orange/red bacteria. It suggested that the bacterial membranes were damaged for some bacteria as it was previously observed for D-Ctl at its MIC. The calculated average elasticity was reduced by a factor of 3 with respect to the untreated bacteria (105 ± 69 kPa, see Fig. 6). The action of both enantiomers was almost the same on the membrane elasticity at their MICs.

For higher concentrations of L-Ctl and D-Ctl (at 750 µg/mL and above 40 µg/mL, respectively) no infrared spectra could be recorded (Fig. 5e,f and h ). This result was in accordance with epifluorescence images. Only very few bacteria were observed on the filters. The bacteria were almost completely lysed. In the case of L-Ctl, AFM measurements show no significant difference between the treatments performed at the MIC and at 5x MIC in terms of elasticity (112 ± 56 kPa for the latter concentration). For D-Ctl at 40 and 80 µg/mL, the bacterial elasticity could be measured only as soon as at 3 hours and 0.8 hours, respectively, because no bacteria were left after 20 hours of treatment. The average elasticity was already reduced by a factor 7 to 8 (44 ± 37 kPa and 28 ± 21 kPa, respectively, Fig. 6). Conversely to the action of L-Ctl above the MIC, the damages that occurred on the bacteria were reached earlier with D-Ctl, and they were dramatic for the cell integrity.


The rise of antimicrobial resistant microorganisms constitutes an increasingly serious threat to global public health. As a consequence, the efficacy of conventional antimicrobials is rapidly declining, threatening the ability of healthcare professionals to cure common infections1,2. Hence, the development of new antibacterial compounds with less potential to trigger resistance constitutes a public health challenge.

In the last two decades, host defence peptides have been proposed as a potential source of novel antimicrobials12. Although more efficient antimicrobials are currently on the market29, host defence peptides display numerous advantages over conventional antimicrobials, such as an incomparably broad spectrum of action, a fast mode of action and most importantly, a very low potential to induce resistance. In this study, we report the antibacterial properties of D-Ctl on a large panel of bacteria including Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens but also obligate and facultative anaerobes. D-Ctl is a derivative of L-Cateslytin (L-Ctl), already known for its antimicrobial properties, specifically against S. aureus. D-Ctl consists of the same sequence as L-Ctl with all levogyre (L) amino acids replaced by dextrogyre (D) amino acids. By introducing these modifications, we intended to increase the stability of the peptide towards bacterial proteases, as liability is the Achilles’ heel of peptide therapeutics. Indeed, in contrast to L-Ctl, D-Ctl cannot be degraded by cellular proteases. In accordance, our results demonstrated that D-Ctl is stable in all bacterial supernatant tested (MSSA and MRSA, E. coli wild type and MDR, P. micra, P. intermedia and F. nucleatum). Remarkably, L-Ctl was already a robust compound, resistant to the degradation by secreted proteases from S. aureus MSSA and MRSA18, P. micra, P. intermedia and F. nucleatum but degraded in the supernatant of E. coli wild type and MDR.

As expected, D-Ctl was much more efficient than L-Ctl with a difference in the MIC ranging from 1.7 (MSSA) to 17.9 folds (E. coli MDR). Active against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, D-Ctl could be considered as a broad-spectrum antimicrobial. However, a larger panel of pathogens remain to be screened to validate such an assumption. Nevertheless, D-Ctl was specifically efficient on E. coli wild type and MDR with a MIC of 8.0 µg/mL and 8.4 µg/mL, respectively. Overall, the MICs of D-Ctl were comparable with the ones of LL-37 and its truncated mimetics KE-18 and KR-12 (8.4 to 19.3 µg/mL for S. aureus and 2.1 to 9.8 µg/mL for E. coli)30 but also of human β-defensins 2 and 3, which ranged between 1.4 µg/mL and >250 µg/mL depending on the bacterial strain31. When compared to the antimicrobial of reference for each pathogen, antimicrobials were still more efficient than D-Ctl except for E. coli wild type where the efficiency of D-Ctl (MIC = 8.0 µg/mL) was comparable with ampicillin (MIC = 7.0 µg/mL) and much higher than kanamycin (MIC = 21.6 µg/mL). However and of high interest, the potential for E. coli to develop resistance to D-Ctl under selective pressure was not detectable for D-Ctl, unlike ampicillin and cefotaxime (three fold MIC increase for both antimicrobial over 24 days).

Combination antibacterial therapy is frequently used to prevent or delay the emergence of resistance32. Interestingly, D-Ctl is not only a strong antimicrobial candidate against E. coli, but it can also be used in conjunction with conventional antimicrobials to enhance their antibacterial activity against other pathogens. As a matter of fact, here we report the synergistic effect of D-Ctl and amoxicillin against P. micra and P. intermedia. Furthermore, D-Ctl in combination with cefotaxime, methicillin or amoxicillin displayed an additive antibacterial effect against E. coli MDR, S. aureus and F. nucleatum, respectively. As a result of these associations, the concentration of conventional antimicrobials could be remarkably decreased from a factor two to four with potential implications on bacterial resistance.

Remarkably, the antibacterial activity of D-Ctl was not associated with cellular toxicity and does not interfere with the production of cytokines from LPS-stimulated PBMCs. These toxicology outcomes constitute a valuable point towards the use of D-Ctl as a new antimicrobial against E. coli infections. Indeed, the powerful antibacterial activity of most antimicrobials currently on the market is balanced by detrimental side effects. Specifically, fluoroquinolones, the antimicrobials of reference against E. coli infections are associated with immunomodulation, severe nephrotoxicity and tendinopathies33,34. Besides, D-Ctl was insensitive to proteases secreted by targeted pathogens. This property of D-Ctl was expected, as there is no L-amino acid within its structure.

Mechanism by which D-Ctl exerts its antibacterial activity was deciphered by physico-chemical methods. From the infrared data, it is suggested that the bacterial metabolism was not or poorly impacted. However the bacterial membrane was permeabilized as it was shown by the epifluorescence images after BacLightTM staining. From the drastic decrease of the cell wall elasticity, it can be also suggested that the bacterial cell wall is highly damaged, and action of D-Ctl leads to loss of cytosol until the bacterial lysis and the death of the bacteria. Here we showed that the rate of the antimicrobial action and the minimum amount of peptide molecules necessary to reach the cell lysis are strongly dependent on the conformation of the peptide. Surprisingly, our results demonstrated that the D-conformer had the most efficient action for the lowest MIC (by a factor of around 20), contrary to previous studies that did not show such a significant difference in antimicrobial activity of L- and D-conformers35,36.

In the last decade, there have been a few HDPs entering clinical trials, specifically cathelicidins and defensins natural peptides or derivatives such as LL-37, MBI-226 (studies NCT00211523, NCT00211497 and NCT00027248 for the prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infections and acne) and PMX-30063 (study NCT01211470 for acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infection). However, the clinical and commercial development of these peptide-based drugs has some limitations such as high cost of production, susceptibility to proteases and cytotoxicity. For example, the human cathelicidin LL-37 enhances apoptosis of epithelial cells, smooth muscle cells and T cells at levels above 10 µM37. Besides being cytotoxic, LL-37 is also sensitive to protease cleavage, leading to the abolishment of its antimicrobial properties38. Defensins have also been extensively considered as an alternative to classical antimicrobials. However, the main limitation to their use as therapeutics is the lack of efficient production methods due to their complex secondary and tertiary structures39,40. In this context, D-Ctl presents many assets compared to other peptide-based drugs. Indeed, D-Ctl is short (15 amino acids) and linear, which makes it really easy to produce. Moreover, the use of a D-peptide emerges as a fruitful strategy to avoid degradation by secreted bacterial proteases. To put it in a nutshell, D-Ctl emerges as a potent, safe and robust antimicrobial with undetectable susceptibility to resistance, which makes it an attractive candidate for biopharmaceutical development. However, for an eventual entry into humans, a full assessment of safety pharmacology and drug toxicology will have to be conducted.


Peptide synthesis

The chemically synthesized peptides corresponding to L-Cateslytin (L-Ctl) and D-Cateslytin (D-Ctl) (RSMRLSFRARGYGFR, purity >95%) were purchased from Proteogenix.

Microorganisms and mammalian cell cultivation

Escherischia coli (ATCC® 25922™), Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC® 25923™), Fusobacterium nucleatum (ATCC® 49256™), Prevotella intermedia (ATCC® 49046™) and Parvimonas micra (ATCC® 33270™) were purchased from ATCC. E. coli K-12 mutant multidrug resistant (MDR) was kindly provided by the Institut Pasteur of Paris. This strain was constructed from E. coli MG1655 (E. coli genetic stock center CGSC#6300). It is resistant to specific antimicrobials such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and kanamycin25. The S. aureus Methicillin Resistant (MRSA) S1 strain was kindly provided by Dr Gilles Prévost (University of Strasbourg)18. Microorganisms were cultured according to the manufacturer’s or the owner’s instructions in their respective media: Luria Bertani broth (Sigma) was used for E. coli strains, Mueller Hinton broth (Difco) for S. aureus strains and Anaerobe Basal broth (Oxoid) for F. nucleatum, P. intermedia and P. micra.

The Caco-2 cell line (ATCC® HTB-37™) was kindly provided by Dr Benoît Frisch (UMR 7199 CNRS University of Strasbourg) and cultured at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 20% bovine calf serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells (PBMC) from healthy volunteers were obtained from the blood transfusion centre of Strasbourg (Etablissement Français du Sang, Strasbourg) and isolated by density gradient centrifugation using Lymphoprep™ (Stemcell Technologies). PMBC were then maintained in AIM V® medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator.

Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) determination

The MIC was determined by broth microdilution. An overnight culture of each bacterial strain was diluted (approximately to OD600 = 0,001) and microorganisms were plated in 96-well plates in the presence of different concentrations of antimicrobials, D-Ctl or L-Ctl alone or in combination. Three technical replicates were performed for each condition. After 24 hours of incubation, the microorganism growth was assessed by optical density OD600 using a Multiskan™ EX microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The MIC, defined as the lowest concentration of a drug alone or in combination able to inhibit 100% of the inoculum, was determined from a modified Gompertz model as described in Lambert et al.41. Each experiment was performed with at least three biological replicates.

Haemolytic assays

The lysis of red blood cells was monitored by the release of haemoglobin to the extracellular environment. Whole blood from one healthy volunteer was obtained from the blood transfusion centre of Strasbourg (Etablissement Français du Sang, Strasbourg). Cells were then washed twice with PBS (800 g, 10 min), resuspended in 1 mL of PBS and incubated with D-Ctl or L-Ctl at different concentrations (0–100 μg/mL) for 1 hour at 37 °C. As a positive control, total lysis of red blood cells was obtained by incubating the cells with 0.1% SDS. For each condition, three technical replicates were performed. After the incubation, cells were centrifuged at 800 g for 10 min and the level of haemoglobin released in the supernatant was determined by optical density OD420 using a Multiskan™ EX microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

Cell viability assays

The MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] assay was used to assess the cytotoxicity of D-Ctl and L-Ctl. Cells in their exponential phase of growth were seeded into a 96-well plate at 1 × 106 cells/mL prior being treated with a tenfold serial dilution of D-Ctl or L-Ctl. Three technical replicates were performed for each condition. After 72 hours incubation, MTT (Sigma-Aldrich) was added to each well at a final concentration of 0.25 mg/mL. Cells were then incubated for an additional 2 hours at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator and lysed with isopropanol/HCl (96:4, v/v). Cell cytotoxicity was then assessed by optical density OD570 using a Multiskan™ EX microplate spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Each experiment was performed with at least three biological replicates.

Cytokine release assays

The following cytokines: G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-13, IL-17, MCP-1, MIP-1β, TNF-α were measured using the Bio-Plex® Multiplex Immunoassay system (Bio-Rad). In brief, human PBMCs were prepared as previously described and treated for 24 hours with D-Ctl (60 μg/mL), L-Ctl (60 μg/mL) or LPS (5 μg/mL). Three technical replicates were performed for each condition. Supernatants were then filtered and assessed for cytokine dosage according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Resistance acquisition assays

An E. coli (ATCC® 25922™) culture was sequentially diluted every day in the presence of the different antibacterial compounds: D-Ctl, ampicillin or cefotaxime at ½ MIC during 24 days. The changes in the MICs values were determined as previously described by broth microdilution at the indicated times. The experiment was performed with three technical replicates.

Peptide stability assays towards secreted bacterial proteases

Bacterial supernatant was prepared as follows: a single colony of each strain was resuspended in 5 mL of culture medium as indicated above and incubated at 37 °C overnight. The culture was then centrifuged at 10000 g for 1 min and the supernatant was filtered using a 0.22 mM MillexH-GV (Millipore, Carrigtwohill, Ireland). An aliquot of each supernatant was incubated at 37 °C for 48 hours. Absence of growth was interpreted as lack of viable microorganism. 400 μL of supernatant was then incubated with or without each peptide of interest at 37 °C for 24 hours. As a control, each peptide was incubated in water at 37 °C for 24 hours. Samples were then separated using a Dionex HPLC system (Ultimate 3000; Sunnyvale, CA USA) on a Nucleosil reverse-phase 300–5C18-column (46250 mm; particle size: 5 mm; porosity, 300 Å) (Macherey Nagel, Hoerdt, France). Absorbance was monitored at 214 nm and the solvent system consisted of 0.1% (v/v) TFA in water (solvent A) and 0.09% (v/v) TFA in 70% (v/v) acetonitrile-water (solvent B). Elution was performed at a flow rate of 700 mL/min with a gradient of solvent B as indicated on the chromatograms.

Planktonic E. coli suspensions for physicochemical analysis

The bacterial model used for the physicochemical analysis (AFM, infrared spectroscopy and epifluorescence microscopy) is E. coli MDR. Bacteria were cultured in Luria Broth (Miller, Fluka) at 25 g/L (LB) or at 6.25 g/L (LB/4) in deionized water (Purelab Option, ELGA). All the cultures were incubated in a water bath shaker (Inova 3100, New Brunswick Scientific) at 37 ± 1 °C and under continuous agitation at 160 rpm. After an overnight subculture (16 hours, with ampicillin and kanamycin), bacteria were cultured in 200 mL of LB medium (without antimicrobials) with an initial optical density at 600 nm (OD600, measured with a cell density meter Biochrom AG, Fisherbrand) of 0.050 ± 0.005.

For epifluorescence and infrared spectroscopy analyses, the antimicrobial assays against planktonic E. coli MDR were performed in duplicate in sterile 96-well plates (Nunc) in a final volume of 200 mL. When the optical density of the bacterial culture reached an OD600 value between 0.5 and 0.6 (bacteria were at the end of the exponential phase), the suspension was diluted in LB or LB/4 to give an OD600 = 0.10 ± 0.01. The necessary volume of the stock solution of the peptide at 1 g/L was spotted in the bacterial suspension. Sterility and growth controls were sterile LB and LB/4, and a bacterial suspension without peptide, respectively. The plate was incubated for 20 hours at 22 °C.

Epifluorescence optical microscopy

Planktonic bacteria were analysed by fluorescence microscopy using the BacLightTM stain kit (L7012, Molecular Probes, Eugene, USA) in order to determine the permeability of the cells in the absence and presence of the peptide. This kit contains two nucleic acids dyes: SYTO 9 (excitation/emission maxima: 480/500 nm) that penetrates all the cells, and propidium iodide that penetrates only cells with damaged membranes (excitation/emission maxima: 490/635 nm). Therefore, bacteria with intact membranes fluoresce green, while bacteria with damaged membranes fluoresce red. After 20 hours of incubation, 200 µL of the 24 hours-old bacterial suspension were mixed with 300 µL of BacLightTM solution (15 µL of the reconstructed BacLightTM solution as described by the manufacturer in 300 µL of sterile water), and stained for 20 min in the dark at 22 ± 1 °C. The suspension was then filtrated with 0.2 µm black filters (Millipore, GTBP04700) and rinsed three times with sterile water to eliminate excess BacLightTM. The sample was mounted in BacLightTM mounting oil as described by the manufacturer. Both fluorescences were viewed simultaneously with the 100x oil immersion objective of an Olympus BX51 microscope equipped with an Olympus XC50 camera.

ATR-FTIR spectroscopy

ATR-FTIR spectra were recorded between 4000 and 800 cm−1 on a Bruker Vertex 70 v spectrometer equipped with a KBr beam splitter and a DTGS detector, and driven by the OPUS 7.5 software. The resolution of the single beam spectra was 4 cm−1. A nine-reflection diamond ATR accessory (DurasamplIR™, SensIR Technologies, incidence angle: 45°) was used for acquiring spectra. The number of bidirectional double-sided interferogram scans was 200, which corresponds to a 2 min accumulation. All interferograms were Fourier processed using the Mertz phase correction mode and a Blackman-Harris three-term apodization function. No ATR correction was performed. Measurements were performed at 21 ± 1 °C in an air-conditioned room. 50 µL of the bacterial suspensions in their culture media was put on the ATR crystal. Half of the suspension was centrifuged at 8000 rpm during 5 min and the supernatant was used to remove the spectral background. Water vapour subtraction was performed when necessary.

AFM mechanical properties measurements

AFM experiments were carried out using a MFP3D-BIO instrument (Asylum Research Technology, Oxford Instruments Company, Mannheim, Germany). Silicon nitride cantilevers of conical shape were purchased from Asylum Research Technology (Olympus TR400 PSA, Mannheim, Germany). The spring constants of the cantilevers measured using the thermal noise method were found to be 0.02–0.03 nN/nm. Experiments were performed in triplicate in PBS at room temperature. The nanoindentation method was used to determine the Young’s modulus from the force vs. indentation curves. Mechanical properties were obtained by recording a grid map of 50-by-50 force curves on several bacterial clusters containing at least 10 bacteria electrostatically immobilized onto PEI coated glass substrate. The maximal loading force was 4 nN, the piezodrive was fixed to 2 µm and the approach rate was 2 µm/s. The histograms corresponding to the statistic distribution of the Young modulus were estimated from the analysis of the approach curves according to the Sneddon model42,43 where δ is the indentation depth, ν the Poisson coefficient, R is the curvature radius of AFM-tip apex and f BECC the bottom effect correction described by Gavara et Chadwick42. All the FVI were analysed by mean of an automatic Matlab algorithm described elsewhere44. Bacteria were then exposed to various L-Ctl concentrations (8, 150 and 750 µg/mL) and also to various D-Ctl concentrations (8, 40 and 80 µg/mL) in PBS buffer at 22 °C for 20 hours. Mechanical properties were measured by AFM in force mapping mode at indentation rate of 2 µm/s and the average values correspond to at least 500 force curves taken from at least 10 bacteria. For bars labelled with * and ** the corresponding values were obtained after only 3 and 0.8 hours of peptide exposure, respectively. Of notice, beyond these exposure periods all bacteria were too damaged and not enough for relevant measurements.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Ventola, C. L. The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 2: management strategies and new agents. P & T: a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management. 40(5), 344–52 (2015).

  2. 2.

    Ventola, C. L. The antibiotic resistance crisis: part 1: causes and threats. P & T: a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management. 40(4), 277–83 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Cornejo-Juarez, P. et al. The impact of hospital-acquired infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria in an oncology intensive care unit. International journal of infectious diseases: IJID: official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases. 31, 31–4 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Peleg, A. Y. & Hooper, D. C. Hospital-acquired infections due to gram-negative bacteria. N Engl J Med. 362(19), 1804–13 (2010).

  5. 5.

    Johnson, J. R. et al. Abrupt emergence of a single dominant multidrug-resistant strain of Escherichia coli. J Infect Dis. 207(6), 919–28 (2013).

  6. 6.

    Nicolas-Chanoine, M. H. et al. Intercontinental emergence of Escherichia coli clone O25:H4-ST131 producing CTX-M-15. J Antimicrob Chemother. 61(2), 273–81 (2008).

  7. 7.

    Petty, N. K. et al. Global dissemination of a multidrug resistant Escherichia coli clone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(15), 5694–9 (2014).

  8. 8.

    Totsika, M. et al. Insights into a multidrug resistant Escherichia coli pathogen of the globally disseminated ST131 lineage: genome analysis and virulence mechanisms. PLoS One. 6(10), e26578 (2011).

  9. 9.

    Emmerson, A. M. & Jones, A. M. The quinolones: decades of development and use. J Antimicrob Chemother. 51(Suppl 1), 13–20 (2003).

  10. 10.

    Afacan, N. J., Yeung, A. T., Pena, O. M. & Hancock, R. E. Therapeutic potential of host defense peptides in antibiotic-resistant infections. Curr Pharm Des. 18(6), 807–19 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Peschel, A. & Sahl, H. G. The co-evolution of host cationic antimicrobial peptides and microbial resistance. Nature reviews Microbiology. 4(7), 529–36 (2006).

  12. 12.

    Zasloff, M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms. Nature. 415(6870), 389–95 (2002).

  13. 13.

    Hilchie, A. L., Wuerth, K. & Hancock, R. E. Immune modulation by multifaceted cationic host defense (antimicrobial) peptides. Nature chemical biology. 9(12), 761–8 (2013).

  14. 14.

    Aslam, R. et al. Chromogranin A-derived peptides are involved in innate immunity. Curr Med Chem. 19(24), 4115–23 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Metz-Boutigue, M. H., Goumon, Y., Strub, J. M., Lugardon, K. & Aunis, D. Antimicrobial chromogranins and proenkephalin-A-derived peptides: Antibacterial and antifungal activities of chromogranins and proenkephalin-A-derived peptides. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 992, 168–78 (2003).

  16. 16.

    Shooshtarizadeh, P. et al. The antimicrobial peptides derived from chromogranin/secretogranin family, new actors of innate immunity. Regul Pept. 165(1), 102–10 (2010).

  17. 17.

    Taupenot, L., Harper, K. L. & O’Connor, D. T. The chromogranin-secretogranin family. N Engl J Med. 348(12), 1134–49 (2003).

  18. 18.

    Aslam, R. et al. Cateslytin, a Chromogranin A Derived Peptide Is Active against Staphylococcus aureus and Resistant to Degradation by Its Proteases. PLoS One. 8(7), e68993 (2013).

  19. 19.

    Briolat, J. et al. New antimicrobial activity for the catecholamine release-inhibitory peptide from chromogranin A. Cell Mol Life Sci. 62(3), 377–85 (2005).

  20. 20.

    (EUCAST) European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Terminology relating to methods for the determination of susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial agents. EUCAST Definitive document E Def 12. Clin Microbiol infect. 6, 503–8 (2000).

  21. 21.

    Sekirov, I. et al. Antibiotic-induced perturbations of the intestinal microbiota alter host susceptibility to enteric infection. Infect Immun. 76(10), 4726–36 (2008).

  22. 22.

    Sieprawska-Lupa, M. et al. Degradation of human antimicrobial peptide LL-37 by Staphylococcus aureus-derived proteinases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 48(12), 4673–9 (2004).

  23. 23.

    Quiles, F., Humbert, F. & Delille, A. Analysis of changes in attenuated total reflection FTIR fingerprints of Pseudomonas fluorescens from planktonic state to nascent biofilm state. Spectrochimica acta Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy. 75(2), 610–6 (2010).

  24. 24.

    Wilson, W. A. et al. Regulation of glycogen metabolism in yeast and bacteria. FEMS microbiology reviews. 34(6), 952–85 (2010).

  25. 25.

    Francius, G. et al. Bacterial surface appendages strongly impact nanomechanical and electrokinetic properties of Escherichia coli cells subjected to osmotic stress. PLoS One. 6(5), e20066 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Quiles, F., Saadi, S., Francius, G., Bacharouche, J. & Humbert, F. In situ and real time investigation of the evolution of a Pseudomonas fluorescens nascent biofilm in the presence of an antimicrobial peptide. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1858(1), 75–84 (2016).

  27. 27.

    Soon, R. L. et al. Effect of colistin exposure and growth phase on the surface properties of live Acinetobacter baumannii cells examined by atomic force microscopy. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 38(6), 493–501 (2011).

  28. 28.

    da Silva, A. Jr. & Teschke, O. Effects of the antimicrobial peptide PGLa on live Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1643((1–3), 95–103 (2003).

  29. 29.

    Kumar, S. et al. Bacterial Multidrug Efflux Pumps of the Major Facilitator Superfamily as Targets for Modulation. Infectious disorders drug targets. 16(1), 28–43 (2016).

  30. 30.

    Luo, Y. et al. The Naturally Occurring Host Defense Peptide, LL-37, and Its Truncated Mimetics KE-18 and KR-12 Have Selected Biocidal and Antibiofilm Activities Against Candida albicans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli In vitro. Front Microbiol. 8, 544 (2017).

  31. 31.

    Joly, S., Maze, C., McCray, P. B. Jr. & Guthmiller, J. M. Human beta-defensins 2 and 3 demonstrate strain-selective activity against oral microorganisms. J Clin Microbiol. 42(3), 1024–9 (2004).

  32. 32.

    Kumar, A. et al. Early combination antibiotic therapy yields improved survival compared with monotherapy in septic shock: a propensity-matched analysis. Crit Care Med. 38(9), 1773–85 (2010).

  33. 33.

    Dalhoff, A. & Schmitz, F. J. In vitro antibacterial activity and pharmacodynamics of new quinolones. European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases: official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology. 22(4), 203–21 (2003).

  34. 34.

    Badal, S., Her, Y. F. & Maher, L. J. 3rd Nonantibiotic Effects of Fluoroquinolones in Mammalian Cells. J Biol Chem. 290(36), 22287–97 (2015).

  35. 35.

    Chen, Y. et al. Comparison of biophysical and biologic properties of alpha-helical enantiomeric antimicrobial peptides. Chemical biology & drug design. 67(2), 162–73 (2006).

  36. 36.

    Wang, C. K. et al. Mirror Images of Antimicrobial Peptides Provide Reflections on Their Functions and Amyloidogenic Properties. J Am Chem Soc. 138(17), 5706–13 (2016).

  37. 37.

    Oudhoff, M. J. et al. The role of salivary histatin and the human cathelicidin LL-37 in wound healing and innate immunity. Biological chemistry. 391(5), 541–8 (2010).

  38. 38.

    Koneru, L et al. Mirolysin, a LysargiNase from Tannerella forsythia, proteolytically inactivates the human cathelicidin, LL-37. Biological chemistry (2016).

  39. 39.

    Marr, A. K., Gooderham, W. J. & Hancock, R. E. Antibacterial peptides for therapeutic use: obstacles and realistic outlook. Current opinion in pharmacology. 6(5), 468–72 (2006).

  40. 40.

    Corrales-Garcia, L. L., Possani, L. D. & Corzo, G. Expression systems of human beta-defensins: vectors, purification and biological activities. Amino acids. 40(1), 5–13 (2011).

  41. 41.

    Lambert, R. J. & Pearson, J. Susceptibility testing: accurate and reproducible minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and non-inhibitory concentration (NIC) values. J Appl Microbiol. 88(5), 784–90 (2000).

  42. 42.

    Gavara, N. & Chadwick, R. S. Determination of the elastic moduli of thin samples and adherent cells using conical atomic force microscope tips. Nature nanotechnology. 7(11), 733–6 (2012).

  43. 43.

    Sneddon, I. The relation between load and penetration in the axisymmetric boussinesq problem for a punch of arbitrary profile. Int J Eng Sci. 3, 47–57 (1965).

  44. 44.

    Polyakov, P. et al. Automated force volume image processing for biological samples. PLoS One. 6(4), e18887 (2011).

Download references


This work was supported by the Marie Curie Research Grants Scheme, CIG (Career Integration Grant) attributed to C.M.

Author information


  1. Université de Strasbourg, Faculté de Chirurgie Dentaire, 3 rue Sainte Elisabeth, 67000, Strasbourg, France

    • Abdurraouf Zaet
    • , Pauline Dartevelle
    • , Fadoua Daouad
    • , Claire Ehlinger
    • , Christian Boehler
    • , Camille Bergthold
    • , Francis Schneider
    • , Youssef Haïkel
    •  & Céline Marban
  2. Inserm UMR 1121, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, 11 rue Humann, 67085, Strasbourg, France

    • Abdurraouf Zaet
    • , Pauline Dartevelle
    • , Fadoua Daouad
    • , Claire Ehlinger
    • , Christian Boehler
    • , Camille Bergthold
    • , Philippe Lavalle
    • , Francis Schneider
    • , Youssef Haïkel
    • , Marie-Hélène Metz-Boutigue
    •  & Céline Marban
  3. Université de Lorraine, Laboratoire de Chimie Physique et Microbiologie pour l’Environnement, LCPME, UMR 7564, 54600 Villers-lès, Nancy, F-54600, France

    • Fabienne Quilès
    •  & Grégory Francius
  4. CNRS, Laboratoire de Chimie Physique et Microbiologie pour l’Environnement, LCPME, UMR 7564, 54600 Villers-lès, Nancy, F-54600, France

    • Fabienne Quilès
    •  & Grégory Francius
  5. Laboratoire de Conception et Applications des Molécules Bioactives, Faculté de Pharmacie, UMR 7199 CNRS/Université de Strasbourg, 74 Route du Rhin, 67401, Illkirch, France

    • Benoît Frisch
  6. Université de Strasbourg, CHRU Strasbourg, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, VBP EA/7290, 67000, Strasbourg, France

    • Gilles Prévost
  7. Service de Réanimation Médicale, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

    • Francis Schneider


  1. Search for Abdurraouf Zaet in:

  2. Search for Pauline Dartevelle in:

  3. Search for Fadoua Daouad in:

  4. Search for Claire Ehlinger in:

  5. Search for Fabienne Quilès in:

  6. Search for Grégory Francius in:

  7. Search for Christian Boehler in:

  8. Search for Camille Bergthold in:

  9. Search for Benoît Frisch in:

  10. Search for Gilles Prévost in:

  11. Search for Philippe Lavalle in:

  12. Search for Francis Schneider in:

  13. Search for Youssef Haïkel in:

  14. Search for Marie-Hélène Metz-Boutigue in:

  15. Search for Céline Marban in:


Study conception and design: C.M. and M.H.M.B., acquisition of data: A.Z., P.D., F.D., C.E., F.Q., G.F., C.Bo., C.Be., analysis and interpretation of data: C.M., M.H.M.B., A.Z., F.Q., G.F., B.F., G.P., P.L., F.S., Y.H., drafting of manuscript: C.M., M.H.M.B. F.Q., G.F. All authors review the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Céline Marban.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history






Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.