Article | Open | Published:

Meta-analysis of the interaction between serotonin transporter promoter variant, stress, and posttraumatic stress disorder

Scientific Reportsvolume 7, Article number: 16532 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Exposure to stress predicts the occurrence of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in individuals harboring the serotonin transporter promoter variant 5-HTTLPR. We carried out a meta-analysis of studies investigating the interaction between 5-HTTLPR, stress, and PTSD to clarify the interrelatedness of these factors. We reviewed all relevant studies published in English before May 2016. The Lipták–Stouffer z-score method for meta-analysis was applied to combined data. The z score was separately calculated for the stressful life events, childhood adversity, bi- and triallelic loci, and cross-sectional and longitudinal studies subgroups. A total of 14 studies with 15,883 subjects met our inclusion criteria. We found strong evidence that the presence of 5-HTTLPR influenced the relationship between stress and PTSD (P = 0.00003), with the strongest effects observed in the cross-sectional and longitudinal groups (P = 0.01 and 2.0 × 10−6, respectively). Stressful life events and childhood adversity separately interacted with 5-HTTLPR in PTSD (P = 2.0 × 10−8 and 0.003, respectively). When the studies were stratified by locus classification, the evidence was stronger for the triallelic (P = 4.0 × 10−8) than for the biallelic (P = 0.054) locus subgroup. There was strong evidence that 5-HTTLPR influences the relationship between stress and PTSD.

Introduction

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a complex and multifactorial anxiety disorder1, and the lifetime prevalence estimates 6% worldwide2. Since its classification in the third revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III), PTSD has increasingly been recognized as a major public health issue3,4,5. In DSM-V, PTSD is characterized by the appearance of three symptom clusters following an acutely traumatic event: re-experiencing (flashbacks and nightmares), avoidance of trauma-related stimuli, and hyperarousal4. PTSD differs from other common mental disorders in that exposure to traumatic stressors is a prerequisite for diagnosis.

Stressful circumstances include stressful life events (natural disasters and war) as well as childhood adversity including abuse (e.g., sexual and physical), neglect (failure of caretakers to provide for basic needs such as food), and parental death or divorce can contribute to the etiology of PTSD. Stressful life events are described as circumstances that have a negative impact on individuals that occur close to the onset or relapse of the illness6. In the weeks following a stressful life event, most individuals exhibit acute reactions such as negative thoughts or dreams concerning the event, hyper-alertness, irritability, and problems with sleep, memory, and/or concentration7,8,9,10,11. It has been shown that clustering of severely stressful life events precedes the occurrence of PTSD or the worsening of symptoms12. Childhood adversity is defined as stressful experiences that occur early in life13. Numerous studies have demonstrated that childhood adversity is associated with a range of metal disorders including major depression14, antisocial disorder, substance abuse15, and PTSD16. Early life stress can cause permanent changes in brain structure and function17, which can in turn influence the response to trauma experienced in adulthood.

PTSD is thought to be influenced not only by environmental but also genetic factors18,19; the latter account for at least one third of the variance in PTSD risk20,21. Several gene loci associated with PTSD have been identified18,19,22, including a polymorphism in the serotonin (5-hydroxytrptamine, 5-HT) transporter (5-HTT) gene (SLC6A4) promoter region18,23. SLC6A4 has been reported to modulate sensitivity to stress and susceptibility to psychopathology24. SLC6A4 promoter is modified by elements within the proximal 5 regulatory region known as the 5-HTT gene-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR)25, which contains a polymorphism with a rare short (S) and more common long (L) allele; the former is associated with reduced transcriptional efficiency of the promoter26, which has been linked to suicidal behavior27, depression28, and PTSD29. 5-HTTLPR variants have a third functional allele: Lg contains an A > G polymorphism at position 6 of the first two 22-bp imperfect repeats that define the 16-repeat L allele (the single nucleotide polymorphism rs25531)30. Thus, 5-HTTLPR is a triallelic locus from which Lg and S alleles (both reclassified as S’) are expressed at similar levels13 and La (reclassified as L’) has higher expression31,32.

SLC6A4 modulates various types of emotional response33. Many studies have investigated a potential interaction between SLC6A4 and the environment in PTSD29,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46, including significant interactions involving both the low-29,35,37,38,40,44 and high-34 expression genotypes. Some studies reported a significant interaction involving the S allele43,45, but this was not confirmed by other investigators36,39,41,42,46. These inconsistencies may be due to differences in study design and statistical power.

Two recent meta-analysis assessed the set of studies exploring the association between 5-HTTLPR and PTSD and concluded that evidence did not support the presence of the association47,48. However, none of two meta-analyses has assessed the interaction between 5-HTTLRP and stress type in PTSD. In order to clarify the role of SLC6A4 in the etiology of PTSD, we sought to carried out a meta-analysis of published studies on the relationship between 5-HTTLPR, stress, and PTSD. Specifically, three subgroup analysis stratified by type of stressor, study design, and locus classification was first used to detect the interaction effect and sensitivity analysis was conducted to detect publication bias in overall and subgroup analysis. The various studies employed different study designs, making it difficult to merge the results into a single traditional meta-analysis. The Lipták–Stouffer z-score, which is useful in situations where equivalent raw data are not available across relevant studies49, has been used to combine P values from many studies of gene and environment interaction50,51,52. Here we used the Lipták–Stouffer z-score to combine information at the level of significance tests to assess whether variations in 5-HTTLPR influences the relationship between stress and PTSD.

Materials and Methods

Studies

In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines53, we identified candidate studies by examining previous meta-analyses and review articles retrieved from PubMed, Wolters Kluwer, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Elsevier Science Direct from study inception up to May 2016 using the following search terms without restrictions: “posttraumatic stress disorder” or “PTSD”, “serotonin transporter gene” or “5-HTTLPR”, “stress”, “trauma”, and “ gene-environment interaction”47,48. In addition, we carried out related searches online using Baidu Scholar. We also examined references in prior meta-analyses and review articles to identify eligible publications.

Two investigators independently reviewed the remaining articles to establish eligibility based on predefined inclusion criteria. We included only human studies published in English before May 2016 that investigated the effect of 5-HTTLPR on the relationship between PTSD and stress, or the relationship between 5-HTTLPR polymorphisms and stressful events and/or childhood adversity. The genotype distributions in the studies were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. One study was excluded because it used the same data as another study included in the analysis54. A total of 14 independent investigations with 15,883 study subjects met the inclusion criteria.

To ascertain whether results were affected by study design characteristics, we analyzed subgroups based on three variables, some of which have been defined in recent review articles51,52. We stratified studies by type of stressor (stressful life events and childhood adversity), study design (cross-sectional and longitudinal), and by locus classification (bi- and triallelic loci).


Quality assessment

The methodological quality of eligible studies was evaluated according to a quality checklist derived from Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology checklists55,56, which have been used in some gene-environment interaction meta-analyses50,51,52. In accordance with current guidelines and prior studies50,51,52, included studies were not weighted by quality scores or excluded based on low scores. We nonetheless describe data quality in Supplementary Materials of Table S1 for readers to evaluate.


P value extraction

Two authors independently extracted P values from each included study without divergence. If a study did not report an exact statistical outcome (e.g., the article stated only P > 0.05), the authors were contacted to obtain more precise values. If that was unsuccessful, a P value of 1 (indicating a lack of outcome) was assigned. In some instances, several P values were reported due to differences in PTSD scales or sample subsets among studies. Therefore, weighted mean P values were used in our analyses. If reported analyses corresponded to different groups, the mean of P values for each group were incorporated into the overall analysis.


Statistical analysis

After combining eligible studies, we applied the Lipták–Stouffer z-score to obtain an aggregate value based on the significance level of tests weighed by sample size. We first converted extracted P values to one-tailed metrics where P values Z<0.50 indicated greater sensitivity to S/Lg allele stress and those >0.50 corresponded to greater sensitivity to L/La stress in PTSD. We then converted these P values to z scores, with positive and negative z scores corresponding to P values less and greater than 0.05, respectively. The z scores were incorporated into the following formula:

$${Z}_{w}=\frac{{\sum }_{i=1}^{k}{W}_{i}{Z}_{i}}{\sqrt{{\sum }_{i=1}^{k}{W}_{i}^{2}}}$$

where the weighting factor Wi corresponds to the study sample size; Zi is the study z score; and k is the total number of studies. Zw conformed to a normal distribution and the corresponding probability was obtained from a standard normal distribution table. This statistical procedure was applied to all studies and to the stratified analyses.

To determine whether any single study had a disproportionate influence on our results, we carried out sensitivity analyses by computing Zw after removing each study in turn. To gauge publication bias, we calculated the fail-safe N for the overall analysis and for each stratified analysis, since unreported studies could potentially influence the conclusions of our meta-analysis. Consistent with previous reports50,51, we counted the number of studies with an assigned P value of 0.50 and the average sample size of studies incorporated into the weighted Lipták–Stouffer analysis that yielded a non-significant result. The ratio of fail-safe N to the number of published studies provided an estimate of publication bias in our results.


Date availability statement

The authors declare that the data in this research is available.

Results

Literature search results

The study selection procedure is shown in Fig. 1. We identified 1644 potentially relevant records through literature searches; 403 were duplicated articles and were excluded. After screening titles and abstracts, 1113 additional articles were excluded, leaving 128 full-text articles for eligibility assessment. We ultimately included 14 studies in our meta-analysis that fulfilled all inclusion criteria. The characteristics of these studies are shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Materials of Table S2.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Flow chart of study screening process.

Table 1 Studies on the interaction between 5-HTTLPR polymorphism, life stress, and PTSD included in the meta-analysis.

Overall meta-analysis

The 14 studies (with a total of 15,883 study subjects) were pooled to assess the interaction between 5-HTTLPR polymorphism, stress, and PTSD. We found strong evidence that 5-HTTLPR influences the relationship between stress and PTSD, with the S allele associated with an increased risk of developing PTSD under stress (P = 3.0 × 10−5) (Fig. 2). The results remained robust when each study was removed in turn from the overall analysis—that is, the overall P values remained significant (3.0 × 10−5 < P < 0.0001) (Table 1).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Forest plot of 14 human observational studies for the interaction of 5-HTTLPR genotype and life stress on PTSD. The squares mark indicate the one-tailed P value for each study, where lower values denote greater stress sensitivity of S allele carriers and higher values correspond to greater stress sensitivity of L allele carriers. The size of the box reflects relative sample size. The red triangle indicates the overall result of meta-analysis. Black squares mark studies that indexed stressful life events; Dark blue indicates childhood adversity; and light blue indicates studies that included both stressful life events and childhood adversities; The squares with red border indicate S/Lg alleles; The squares with blue border indicate S alleles; and the squares with purple border indicate La alleles. The squares with w-resize indicate longitudinal studies and the squares with e-resize indicate cross-sectional studies.

With respect to publication bias, a non-significant result (P = 0.05) in the overall analysis would require more than 226 unpublished or undiscovered studies with an average sample size of n = 1135 and non-significant results (P = 0.50), corresponding to a fail-safe ratio of 16 studies excluded from the meta-analysis for every included study.

Previous studies provided evidence for distinct interaction effects of child adversity and stressful life events with 5-HTTLPR 50 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor 51 in depression; with respect to studies included in the present meta-analysis, results pertaining to the impact of these stressors and the 5-HTTLPR gene in PTSD were examined.

Childhood adversity

Four studies were pooled for a total of 11,409 study subjects; the combined results revealed a significant interaction between 5-HTTLPR and childhood adversity (P = 0.003) (Fig. 2). The sensitivity analysis showed that the results remained significant after each study was removed in turn (1 × 10−4 < P < 0.03) (Table 2). Obtaining a significant result (P = 0.05) would require more than 21 unpublished or undiscovered studies with an average sample size of n = 2852 and non-significant results (P = 0.50). This yields a fail-safe ratio of five excluded studies for every study included in the present meta-analysis.

Table 2 Studies included in the life stress group meta-analysis.

Stressful life events

Twelve studies were pooled for a total of 8771 study subjects; the results revealed a significant interaction between stressful life events and 5-HTTLPR polymorphism (P = 2.0 × 10−8) (Fig. 2). The sensitivity analysis showed that the P value remained significant after removing each study in turn and calculating the outcome (3.0 × 10−9 < P < 4.0 × 10−7) (Table 3). More than 166 unpublished or undiscovered studies with a null effect (P = 0.50) and average sample size of n = 731 would be required for this to be a non-significant outcome in the stratified analysis (P = 0.05), corresponding to a fail-safe ratio of 14 excluded studies for every study included in this meta-analysis.

Table 3 Studies included in the childhood adversity group meta-analysis.

The time at which a stressor is measured can affect the gene and environment interaction effect57, while recalling adversity over long periods of time may increase the risk of forgetting or discounting events24. This type of bias can largely be avoided in longitudinal studies. We carried out a subgroup analysis based on study design to determine whether outcomes differed between cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.

Cross-sectional studies

We identified nine studies with a cross-sectional study design (9864 subjects) for which results were available in separate cross-sectional studies. The meta-analysis revealed a significant interaction between 5-HTTLPR and stress (P = 0.01) (Fig. 2), and the sensitivity analysis revealed that this effect persisted after each study was removed in turn (3.0 × 10−5 < P < 0.04) (Table 4). More than 49 unpublished or undiscovered studies with a sample size of n = 1096 and a non-significant result (P = 0.50) would be required for the outcomes in the stratified analysis to be non-significant (P = 0.05). This yields a fail-safe ratio of five studies excluded for every study included in the meta-analysis.

Table 4 Studies included in the cross-sectional group meta-analysis.

Longitudinal studies

Five studies were pooled with a total of 6019 study subjects, revealing a significant interaction between 5-HTTLPR and life stress (P = 2.0 × 10−6) (Fig. 2). The sensitivity analysis suggested that the results were still significant after removing each study in turn (8.0 × 10−7 < P < 9.0 × 10−5) (Table 5). For these results to be non-significant (P = 0.05), more than 56 unpublished analyses or undiscovered studies with an average sample size of n = 1203 and non-significant results (P = 0.50) would be required, yielding a fail-safe ratio of 11 excluded studies for every study included in the meta-analysis.

Table 5 Studies included in the longitudinal group meta-analysis.

Biallelic locus

We conducted a subgroup analysis stratified by locus to explore the interaction between 5-HTTLPR polymorphism, life stress, and PTSD. Seven studies were pooled with a total of 8023 study subjects; the results revealed a trend towards a significant interaction between a biallelic 5-HTTLPR locus, life stress, and PTSD (P = 0.054) (Fig. 2). The sensitivity analysis indicated that the results remained non-significant after removing each study in turn (0.054 < P < 0.086), with the exception of one study35 (Table 6).

Table 6 Studies included in the S/Lg allele group meta-analysis.

Triallelic locus

Six studies were pooled with a total of 4815 subjects to assess the interaction between a triallelic 5-HTTLPR locus, life stress, and PTSD; a significant interaction was observed (P = 4.0 × 108) (Fig. 2). The results remained significant in the sensitivity analysis when each study was removed in turn from the analysis (2.0 × 10−7 < P < 2.0 × 10−6) (Table 7). To render the outcomes non-significant (P = 0.05), more than 67 unpublished or undiscovered studies with a sample size of n = 802 and non-significant results (P = 0.50) would be required. This yielded a fail-safe ratio of 11 excluded studies for every study included in the meta-analysis.

Table 7 Studies included in the S allele group meta-analysis.

Discussion

This is the first meta-analysis investigating the interaction between 5-HTTLPR polymorphism, stress, and PTSD. We found that 5-HTTLPR polymorphism influenced the relationship between stress and PTSD, with the less frequent S allele associated with increased stress sensitivity. When the meta-analysis was stratified by type of stressor, we found that stressful life events and childhood adversity independently interacted with 5-HTTLPR in PTSD; when the analysis was stratified by study design, we found interactions between 5-HTTLPR and stress in both cross-sectional and longitudinal groups; and when the analysis was stratified by allele classification, the results were more robust for the triallelic models group while the interaction effect for biallelic models failed to reach the predetermined level of significance.

The overall results are consistent with a recent qualitative review58, and are in accordance with studies that have reported increased stress reactivity among 5-HTTLRP S allele carriers59,60. Animal studies have also demonstrated that functional variations in the 5-HTT gene affect behavioral response to stress. Specifically, 5-HTT knockout mice showed increased hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation in response to both physical and psychological stressors61,62, as well as defects in cortical development and altered expression of 5-HT receptor subtypes63,64,65. Moreover, evidence from studies in mice and non-human primates have shown that 5-HTT gene variants are associated with changes in central nervous system biochemistry and behaviors linked to stress sensitivity66,67.

Of the 14 studies that investigated the influence of stressful life events and childhood adversity on PTSD, 12 examined the interaction effects between stressful life events and 5-HTTLPR; eight of these reported a significant interaction for PTSD29,34,35,37,38,40,44,45, whereas four did not find any evidence of interaction36,41,42,46. Four of the 14 studies investigated the interaction between childhood adversity and 5-HTTLPR, with three reporting a significant interaction for PTSD35,42,43 and one finding no supporting evidence39. The meta-analysis revealed significant interaction effects for stressful life events and childhood adversity separately interacting with 5-HTTLPR in PTSD. Our results are consistent with studies that have reported an association between 5-HTTLPR and neural responses to traumatic reminders and cognitive control of emotions in PTSD patients and the persistent effects of stressful life events and childhood adversity on hippocampal volume68,69,70,71.

Nine of the 14 studies used a cross-sectional design29,35,36,39,41,42,43,45,46, with four reaching a conventional significance level29,35,43,45; meanwhile, significance was attained by all five studies that used a longitudinal design34,37,38,40,44. The meta-analysis of both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies showed that 5-HTTLPR interacted with stress and PTSD. At least one study has failed to detect a gene–environment interaction between 5-HTTLPR polymorphism and life events in the months immediately preceding PTSD onset72. However, most studies have measured life events in the 5 years prior to PTSD. Retrospective recall of adversity is associated with increased risk of forgetting or discounting events24; thus, when only a lifetime diagnosis of PTSD is available, information about the relative timing of stressors and PTSD is lost. This bias can be avoided to a greater extent in longitudinal than in cross-sectional studies.

We evaluated the association between loci using bi- and triallelic models to determine whether the latter better reflects the interaction between the 5-HTTLPR polymorphism, stress, and PTSD. We found evidence supporting the interaction in the triallelic but not in the biallelic group. Our approach was based on the reclassification of alleles according to lower and higher levels of expression, which is more precise for exploring the interaction between 5-HTTLPR polymorphism, stress, and PTSD30,32.

There were some limitations to the present meta-analysis. Firstly, several of the included studies may have limited power due to their small sample size41,42,44,46. Secondly, since we combined studies at the level of P values, the quality of primary studies may have affected our results. Some primary studies conducted separate tests on different sample subgroups or multiple PTSD measures; we guarded against false-positive results resulting from this potential bias by using an average of reported P values. Finally, we could not estimate the magnitude of genetic effect and how it compares to the interaction effect size73.

In conclusion, we found that 5-HTTLPR influences the relationship between stress and PTSD. Further studies which focus on Gene × Environment interaction are needed to better understand the role of this polymorphism in PTSD risk. Our analysis identified study characteristics that could potentially affect study results such as type of stressor, study design, and allele classification. Childhood adversity and stressful life events could be two good candidate environmental risk factors in G × E research. The triallelic models approach (S/La/Lg) altered the results of meta-analysis comparing with the biallelic models approach(S/L). Special attention should be paid to the triallelic polymorphism in the relationship between 5-HTTLPR, stress and PTSD. These findings provide a basis for designing more rigorous studies on gene–environment interactions in PTSD in the future.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Xie, P. et al. Interactive effect of stressful life events and the serotonin transporter 5-HTTLPR genotype on posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis in 2 independent populations. Arch Gen Psychiatry 66(11), 1201–1209, https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.153 (2009).

  2. 2.

    Yehuda, R. et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder. Nature Reviews Disease Primers, 15057, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.57 (2015).

  3. 3.

    Pichot, P. DSM-III: the3d edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders from the American Psychiatric Association. Revue neurologique 142, 489–499 (1986).

  4. 4.

    Yehuda, R. et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder. Nature reviews. Disease primers 1, 15057, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.57 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Kessler, R. C. Posttraumatic stress disorder: the burden to the individual and to society. The Journal of clinical psychiatry 61 Suppl 5, 4–12; discussion13–14 (2000).

  6. 6.

    Ezquiaga, E., Gutierrez, J. L. A. & López, A. G. Psychosocial factors and episode number in depression. Journal of Affective Disorders 12, 135–138 (1987).

  7. 7.

    Bryant, R. A., Friedman, M. J., Spiegel, D., Ursano, R. & Strain, J. A review of acute stress disorder in DSM-5. Depression and anxiety 28, 802–817, https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20737 (2011).

  8. 8.

    Frommberger, U. H. et al. Prediction of posttraumatic stress disorder by immediate reactions to trauma: a prospective study in road traffic accident victims. European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience 248, 316–321 (1998).

  9. 9.

    Isserlin, L., Zerach, G. & Solomon, Z. Acute stress responses: A review and synthesis of ASD, ASR, and CSR. The American journal of orthopsychiatry 78, 423–429, https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014304 (2008).

  10. 10.

    Rothbaum, B. O., Foa, E. B., Riggs, D. S., Murdock, T. & Walsh, W. A prospective examination of post-traumatic stress disorder in rape victims. Journal of Traumatic Stress 5, 455–475 (1992).

  11. 11.

    Sloan, P. Post-traumatic stress in survivors of an airplane crash-landing: A clinical and exploratory research intervention. Journal of Traumatic Stress 1, 211–229 (1988).

  12. 12.

    Friedman, M. J., Resick, P. A. & Keane, T. M. PTSD: Twenty-five years of progress and challenges (2007).

  13. 13.

    Hu, X. et al. An expanded evaluation of the relationship of four alleles to the level of response to alcohol and the alcoholism risk. Alcoholism Clinical & Experimental Research 29, 8 (2005).

  14. 14.

    Widom, C. S., DuMont, K., Fau, J. & Czaja, S. J. A prospective investigation of major depressive disorder and comorbidity in abused and neglected children grown up. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64(1), 49–56 (2007).

  15. 15.

    Kendler, K. S. et al. Childhood sexual abuse and adult psychiatric and substance use disorders in women: an epidemiological and cotwin control analysis. Arch Gen Psychiatry 57(10), 953–959 (2000).

  16. 16.

    Copeland, W. E., Keeler, G., Angold, A. & Costello, E. J. Traumatic events and posttraumatic stress in childhood. Archives of General Psychiatry 64, 577–584 (2007).

  17. 17.

    Teicher, M. H. et al. The neurobiological consequences of early stress and childhood maltreatment. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 27, 33–44 (2003).

  18. 18.

    Broekman, B. F. P., Olff, M. & Boer, F. The genetic background to PTSD. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 31, 348–362 (2007).

  19. 19.

    Koenen, K. C. Genetics of posttraumatic stress disorder: Review and recommendations for future studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress 20, 737–750 (2007).

  20. 20.

    Stein, M. B., Jang, K. L., Taylor, S., Vernon, P. A. & Livesley, W. J. Genetic and environmental influences on trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: a twin study. Am J Psychiatry 159, 1675–1681 (2002).

  21. 21.

    True, W. R. et al. A twin study of genetic and environmental contributions to liability for posttraumatic stress symptoms. Archives of General Psychiatry 50, 257 (1993).

  22. 22.

    de Quervain, D. J. et al. A deletion variant of the alpha2b-adrenoceptor is related to emotional memory in Europeans and Africans. Nature Neuroscience 10, 1137–1139 (2007).

  23. 23.

    Lee, H. J. et al. Influence of the serotonin transporter promoter gene polymorphism on susceptibility to posttraumatic stress disorder. Depression and Anxiety 21, 135–139 (2005).

  24. 24.

    Caspi, A., Hariri, A. R., Holmes, A., Uher, R. & Moffitt, T. E. Genetic sensitivity to the environment: the case of the serotonin transporter gene and its implications for studying complex diseases and traits. American Journal of Psychiatry 167, 509–527 (2010).

  25. 25.

    Caspi, A. et al. Influence of Life Stress on Depression: Moderation by a Polymorphism in the 5-HTT Gene. Science 301, 386–389 (2003).

  26. 26.

    Lesch, K. P. et al. Association of Anxiety-Related Traits with a Polymorphism in the Serotonin Transporter Gene Regulatory Region. Science 274, 1527–1531 (1996).

  27. 27.

    Li, D. & He, L. Meta-analysis supports association between serotonin transporter (5-HTT) and suicidal behavior. (Willard Grant Press, 2007).

  28. 28.

    Lotrich, F. E. & Pollock, B. G. Meta-analysis of serotonin transporter polymorphisms and affective disorders. Psychiatric Genetics 14, 121 (2004).

  29. 29.

    Kilpatrick, D. G. et al. The serotonin transporter genotype and social support and moderation of posttraumatic stress disorder and depression in hurricane-exposed adults. American Journal of Psychiatry 164, 1693 (2007).

  30. 30.

    Nakamura, M., Ueno, S., Sano, A. & Tanabe, H. The human serotonin transporter gene linked polymorphism (5-HTTLPR) shows ten novel allelic variants. Molecular Psychiatry 5, 32 (2000).

  31. 31.

    Zalsman, G. et al. Association of a Triallelic Serotonin Transporter Gene Promoter Region (5-HTTLPR) Polymorphism With Stressful Life Events and Severity of Depression. American Journal of Psychiatry 163, 1588–1593 (2006).

  32. 32.

    Parsey, R. V. et al. Effect of a triallelic functional polymorphism of the serotonin-transporter-linked promoter region on expression of serotonin transporter in the human brain. American Journal of Psychiatry 163, 48–51 (2006).

  33. 33.

    Caspi, A. & Moffitt, T. E. Gene-environment interactions in psychiatry: joining forces with neuroscience. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 7, 583–590 (2006).

  34. 34.

    Grabe, H. J. Serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) promoter polymorphisms and the susceptibility to posttraumatic stress disorder in the general population. American Journal of Psychiatry 166, 926 (2009).

  35. 35.

    Xie, P. et al. Interactive effect of stressful life events and the serotonin transporter 5-HTTLPR genotype on posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis in 2 independent populations. Archives of general psychiatry 66, 1201 (2009).

  36. 36.

    Kolassa, I. T. et al. Association study of trauma load and SLC6A4 promoter polymorphism in posttraumatic stress disorder: evidence from survivors of the Rwandan genocide. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 71, 543–547 (2010).

  37. 37.

    Holman, E. A., Lucas-Thompson, R. G. & Lu, T. Social constraints, genetic vulnerability, and mental health following collective stress † ‡. Journal of Traumatic Stress 24, 497–505 (2011).

  38. 38.

    Mercer, K. B. et al. Acute and posttraumatic stress symptoms in a prospective gene x environment study of a university campus shooting. Archives of General Psychiatry 69, 89–97 (2011).

  39. 39.

    Xie, P., Kranzler, H. R., Farrer, L. & Gelernter, J. Serotonin transporter 5-HTTLPR genotype moderates the effects of childhood adversity on posttraumatic stress disorder risk: A replication study. (G. Narr, 2012).

  40. 40.

    Wald, I. et al. Attention to threats and combat-related posttraumatic stress symptoms: prospective associations and moderation by the serotonin transporter gene. 70, 1–9 (2013).

  41. 41.

    Pietrzak, R. H., Galea, S., Southwick, S. M. & Gelernter, J. Examining the relation between the serotonin transporter 5-HTTPLR genotype x trauma exposure interaction on a contemporary phenotypic model of posttraumatic stress symptomatology: a pilot study. Journal of Affective Disorders 148, 123–128 (2013).

  42. 42.

    Lai, B. S., La Greca, A. M., Auslander, B. A. & Short, M. B. Children’s risk and resilience following a natural disaster: genetic vulnerability, posttraumatic stress, and depression. Journal of Affective Disorders 151, 860–867 (2013).

  43. 43.

    Walsh, K., Uddin, M., Soliven, R., Wildman, D. E. & Bradleydavino, B. Associations between the SS Variant of 5-HTTLPR and PTSD Among Adults with Histories of Childhood Emotional Abuse: Results from Two African American Independent Samples. Journal of Affective Disorders 161, 91–96 (2014).

  44. 44.

    Telch, M. J. et al. 5-HTTLPR genotype potentiates the effects of war zone stressors on the emergence of PTSD, depressive and anxiety symptoms in soldiers deployed to iraq. World Psychiatry Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association 14, in press (2015).

  45. 45.

    Tian, Y. et al. Association of Genetic Factors and Gene-Environment Interactions With Risk of Developing Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in a Case-Control Study. Biological Research for Nursing 17, 525–528 (2015).

  46. 46.

    Drevo, S. et al. The Role of Social Environment and Gene Interactions on Development of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (2016).

  47. 47.

    Gressier, F. et al. The 5-HTTLPR Polymorphism and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Traumatic Stress 26, 645–653 (2013).

  48. 48.

    Navarromateu, F., Escámez, T., Koenen, K. C., Alonso, J. & Sánchezmeca, J. Meta-analyses of the 5-HTTLPR polymorphisms and post-traumatic stress disorder. Plos One 8, e66227–e66227 (2013).

  49. 49.

    Hedges, L. V. & Olkin, I. Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. American Journal of Sociology 1984, 25–42 (1986).

  50. 50.

    Karg, K., Burmeister, M., Shedden, K. & Sen, S. The Serotonin Transporter Promoter Variant (5-HTTLPR), Stress, and Depression Meta-Analysis Revisited: Evidence of Genetic Moderation. Archives of General Psychiatry 68, 444 (2011).

  51. 51.

    Hosang, G. M. Interaction between stress and the BDNF Val66Met polymorphism in depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Medicine 12, 7 (2014).

  52. 52.

    Byrd, A. L. & Manuck, S. B. MAOA, childhood maltreatment, and antisocial behavior: meta-analysis of a gene-environment interaction. Biological Psychiatry 75, 9–17 (2014).

  53. 53.

    Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G. & Group, P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 6, e1000097, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 (2009).

  54. 54.

    Koenen, K. C. et al. Modification of the association between serotonin transporter genotype and risk of posttraumatic stress disorder in adults by county-level social environment. American Journal of Epidemiology 169, 704 (2009).

  55. 55.

    Little, J. & Birkett, N. STrengthening the REporting of genetic association studies (STREGA)- An extension of the STROBE statement. Genetic Epidemiology 62, 597–608 (2009).

  56. 56.

    Elm, E. V. et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Der Internist 335, 806 (2007).

  57. 57.

    Brown, G. W. & Harris, T. O. Depression and the serotonin transporter 5-HTTLPR polymorphism: A review and a hypothesis concerning gene-environment interaction. Journal of Affective Disorders 111, 1–12 (2008).

  58. 58.

    Koenen, K. C., Amstadter Ab Fau - Nugent, N. R. & Nugent, N. R. Gene-environment interaction in posttraumatic stress disorder: an update. J Trauma Stress 22(5), 416–426, https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20435 (2009).

  59. 59.

    Heinz, A. et al. Serotonin transporter genotype (5-HTTLPR): effects of neutral and undefined conditions on amygdala activation. Biological Psychiatry 61, 1011–1014 (2007).

  60. 60.

    Munafò, M. R., Brown, S. M. & Hariri, A. R. Serotonin transporter (5-HTTLPR) genotype and amygdala activation: a meta-analysis. Biological Psychiatry 63, 852–857 (2008).

  61. 61.

    Li, Q. Cellular and molecular alterations in mice with deficient and reduced serotonin transporters. Molecular Neurobiology 34, 51–66 (2006).

  62. 62.

    Li, Q. et al. Reduction of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1A)-mediated temperature and neuroendocrine responses and 5-HT(1A) binding sites in 5-HT transporter knockout mice. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics 291, 999–1007 (1999).

  63. 63.

    Mössner, R. et al. Quantitation of 5HT3 receptors in forebrain of serotonin transporter deficient mice. Journal of Neural Transmission 111, 27 (2004).

  64. 64.

    Fabre, V. et al. Altered expression and functions of serotonin 5-HT 1A and 5-HT 1B receptors in knock-out mice lacking the 5-HT transporter. European Journal of Neuroscience 12, 2299–2310 (2000).

  65. 65.

    Persico, A. M. et al. Barrel pattern formation requires serotonin uptake by thalamocortical afferents, and not vesicular monoamine release. Journal of Neuroscience the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 21, 6862–6873 (2001).

  66. 66.

    Barr, C. S. et al. Sexual Dichotomy of an Interaction between Early Adversity and the Serotonin Transporter Gene Promoter Variant in Rhesus Macaques. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101, 12358–12363 (2004).

  67. 67.

    Carneiro, A. M. D. et al. Functional Coding Variation in Recombinant Inbred Mouse Lines Reveals Multiple Serotonin Transporter-Associated Phenotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 2047 (2009).

  68. 68.

    Hauser, M. A. et al. Serotonin transporter gene polymorphisms and brain function during emotional distraction from cognitive processing in posttraumatic stress disorder. BMC Psychiatry 11, 76 (2011).

  69. 69.

    Rabl, U. et al. Additive Gene–Environment Effects on Hippocampal Structure in Healthy Humans. Journal of Neuroscience the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 34, 9917–9926 (2014).

  70. 70.

    Teicher, M. H., Anderson, C. M. & Polcari, A. Childhood maltreatment is associated with reduced volume in the hippocampal subfields CA3, dentate gyrus, and subiculum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 563–572 (2012).

  71. 71.

    Gray, J. D., Rubin, T. G., Hunter, R. G. & Mcewen, B. S. Hippocampal gene expression changes underlying stress sensitization and recovery. Molecular Psychiatry 19, 1171–1178 (2013).

  72. 72.

    Brown, G. & Harris, T. Depression and the serotonin transporter 5-HTTLPR polymorphism: a review and a hypothesis concerning gene-environment interaction. Journal of Affective Disorders 111, 1–12 (2008).

  73. 73.

    Clarke, H. Association of the 5-HTTLPR genotype and unipolar depression: a meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine 40, 1767–1778 (2010).

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Mingzhe Zhao and Jiarun Yang contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Psychology Department of the Public Health Institute of Harbin Medical University, No. 157, Baojian Road, Nangang District, Harbin, 150081, China

    • Mingzhe Zhao
    • , Jiarun Yang
    • , Wenbo Wang
    • , Jingsong Ma
    • , Jian Zhang
    • , Xueyan Zhao
    • , Xiaohui Qiu
    • , Xiuxian Yang
    • , Zhengxue Qiao
    • , Xuejia Song
    • , Lin Wang
    • , Shixiang Jiang
    • , Erying Zhao
    •  & Yanjie Yang

Authors

  1. Search for Mingzhe Zhao in:

  2. Search for Jiarun Yang in:

  3. Search for Wenbo Wang in:

  4. Search for Jingsong Ma in:

  5. Search for Jian Zhang in:

  6. Search for Xueyan Zhao in:

  7. Search for Xiaohui Qiu in:

  8. Search for Xiuxian Yang in:

  9. Search for Zhengxue Qiao in:

  10. Search for Xuejia Song in:

  11. Search for Lin Wang in:

  12. Search for Shixiang Jiang in:

  13. Search for Erying Zhao in:

  14. Search for Yanjie Yang in:

Contributions

Yanjie Yang and Mingzhe Zhao designed and concerted the study, Jian Zhang, Xueyan Zhao, Zhengxue Qiao, Xuejia Song, Lin Wang managed the literature searches, Shixiang Jiang and Erying Zhao extracted the data from the literatures, Wenbo Wang, Jingsong Ma, Xiaohui Qiu and Xiuxian Yang analyzed and interpreted the data, Mingzhe Zhao and Jiarun Yang drafted the article. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanjie Yang.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15168-0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.