Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Molecular phylogenetic analysis of new Entoloma rhodopolium-related species in Japan and its identification method using PCR-RFLP


Poisonous Entoloma rhodopolium and other similar species including edible E. sarcopum are morphologically diverse. People mistake poisonous species for edible species. Classification and the detection method of these species need to be defined. The morphological and phylogenetic studies have been reported in northern Europe. In Japan, the genetic study remains unsolved. Thus, phylogenetic analysis of E. rhodopolium was conducted using ITS and RPB2 sequences, and the result was compared with that of European species. Japanese E. rhodopolium was classified into three clades, none of which belonged to the true European E. rhodopolium and other known species. Three species were defined as new species. Entoloma rhodopolium clade-I (named E. lacus) was genetically close to but morphologically separated from E. majaloides. Clade-II (E. subrhodopolium) was classified to the same group as E. sinuatum and E. subsinuatum, but distinct from these species. Clade-III was segregated from known Entoloma species including E. lupinum, and named E. pseudorhodopolium. Based on the classification, a simple identification method PCR-RFLP was developed to discriminate between poisonous species and edible E. sarcopum, which is very similar in morphology. The study can help to clarify the taxonomy of complex E. rhodopolium-related species, and to prevent food poisoning.


The family Entolomataceae Kolt. & Pouzar, which belongs to the order Agaricales, has three main genera: Rhodocybe Maire, Clitopilus (Fr. ex Rabenh) P. Kumm. and Entoloma (Fr.) P. Kumm. s.l. Although most of the mushrooms in the family Entolomataceae are saprotrophic on soil and litter, some of them are ectomycorrhizal, such as Entoloma rhodopolium (Fr.) P. Kumm. and Entoloma sinuatum (Bull.) P. Kumm. The genus Entoloma s.l. is composed of more than 1,500 species and distributed worldwide1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10, and the genus is thought to include several subgenera that are recognized as separate genera by other authors5,11,12. Additionally, Rhodocybe and Clitopilus have been split into or segregated into several genera in contemporaneous classification8,12. Molecular phylogenetic study using three genetic makers RPB2, LSU and mtSSU together with spore morphology revealed that Entoloma s.l. is retained as one genus8. The study also pointed out that the smaller genera within Entoloma s.l. are either polyphyletic or make other genera paraphyletic. This indicates the importance of the molecular phylogenetic studies of Entoloma s.l., whose mushrooms vary in size, shape, and color, but either have pink gills or gills that become dusted with pink and pinkish or pinkish-brown spores in common. Among them, E. rhodopolium and other similar species, which is included in Entoloma subgenus Rhodopolia (Fr.) Noordel. ex Kokkonen13, are morphologically diverse and abundant in Japan. However, the phylogenetic study has not yet been reported, although only E. rhodopolium Tottori Er-1 (Accession number in NCBI, AB301602) is registered as E. rhodopolium. Whether it is identical to E. rhodopolium in Europe and North America remain unclear. In fact, the ITS sequence of E. rhodopolium Tottori Er-1 is distinct from that of true E. rhodopolium that Kokkonen reported as a neotype13. Therefore, a molecular phylogenetic study is needed to classify Japanese E. rhodopolium and compare European and North American species.

Many Entoloma species are reported poisonous such as E. sinuatum 14 in Europe and E. rhodopolium 15,16 in Japan, although some of them are edible such as Entoloma abortivum (Berk. & Curt.) Donk and Entoloma sarcopum Nagas. & Hongo (synonym Rhodophyllus crassipes (Imaz et Toki) Imaz et Hongo) (Nagasawa and Hongo 1999). Entoloma sinuatum is a notorious poisonous mushroom responsible for poisoning in Europe17,18,19. Morgado et al. have reported the species limits of Entoloma subg. Entoloma, showing that E. sinuatum distributes in Europe10. People wrongly identify E. sinuatum as edible sweetbread (Clitopilus prunulus) and St George’s (Calocybe gambosa) mushrooms in Europe20. In Japan, edible E. sarcopum resembles poisonous E. rhodopolium. Therefore, poisoning occurs many times every year. Ninety-five people suffered from mushroom poisoning last year according to the government statistics. To reduce human poisoning by these mushrooms, a new identification method is strongly needed. Identification of poisonous mushrooms was previously reported for four mushrooms, Omphalotus japonicus (Kawam.) Kirchm. & O. K. Mill., E. rhodopolium Tottori Er-1, Tricholoma ustale (Fr.) P. Kumm, and Clitocybe acromelalga by the real-time PCR method21. However, E. rhodopolium in the previous report may be different from true European E. rhodopolium. In addition, the study did not provide any information on genetic variations and nucleotide polymorphisms within each species.

Here we demonstrate the phylogenetic study of Japanese E. rhodopolium by comparing with European Entoloma species and the simple identification method using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) Our findings provide a new significant data on the taxonomy of complex E. rhodopolium-related species, and can help to reduce the cases of mushroom poisoning.


Morphological observation

Characteristics of the mushrooms we considered E. rhodopolium in Japan are as follows: Pilei were 5 to 10 cm in diameter. Almost convex or flat to depressed. Pileus colors varied from grayish brown or yellowish gray to brown or reddish brown when matured, and were hygrophanous. Gills were mostly white and pinkish or brown when old. Stipes were 4 to 12 cm long and 5 to 15 mm wide, and mostly fragile but sometimes solid (Figs 1 and S1). Spores were heterodiametrical, and their average length × width and Q values were shown in the taxonomy section and Fig. S2. Basidia were 2 or 3-spored. Cystidia was not observed in many samples (Fig. 2). Entoloma rhodopolium belongs to Entoloma subgenus Rhodopolia (Fr.) Noordel.ex Kokkonen. The morphological characteristics of our E. rhodopolium, such as pileus, gill, stipe and spores, were similar to those described for E. rhodopolium in the previous report13. Typical E. sarcopum was collected whose characteristics were larger pileus (13 cm–18 cm) and longer and thicker stipe (15 cm>) than our E. rhodopolium, because a smaller size of E. sarcopum mushrooms are quite similar to our E. rhodopolium. The mushrooms we considered E. sinuatum was thicker and more solid than our E. rhodopolium. Representative photographs of our Japanese E. rhodopolium mushrooms are shown in Fig. 1.

Figure 1

Pictures of Japanese E. rhodopolium clades. The clades-I, II, and –III were named E. lacus, E. subrhodopolium, and E. pseudorhodopolium, respectively. Holotypes are shown in this figure. Entoloma sarcopum is also shown for comparison.

Figure 2

Images of spores, basidia, cystidia and pileipellis of E.lacus, E. subrhodopolium, E. pseudorhodopolium, and E. sarcopum. Images shows that spores 5–6 angles, basidia 2-, or 3-spored, cystidia the presence in E. lacus, the absence in E. subrhodopolium and E. pseudorhodopolium.

Phylogenetic analyses of ITS and RPB2 regions from Japanese Entoloma rhodopolium

Samples and datasets used in this study are summarized in Tables S1 and S2. For molecular phylogenetic analyses, ITS and RPB2 regions were separately analyzed because RPB2 sequences were only obtained from some of our samples (named KUB) using CLC Genomics Workbench software. The layout of the phylogram obtained from the analysis of ITS region is shown in Fig. 3. Two large groups A and B were constructed, both of which include two subgroups A1, A2 and B1, B2, respectively. The phylogenetic analysis of ITS region revealed that our E. rhodopolium was separated into three clades (clade-I, -II, and –III). Interestingly, all three clades were segregated from European E. rhodopolium and North American E. aff. rhodopolium (Fig. 4a). Entoloma nidorosum was genetically close to European E. rhodopolium as reported by Kokkonen13. E. rhodopolium clade-II was clearly separated from A1 group including European E. rhodopolium and E. nidorosum, and was classified into A2 group containing E. sinuatum and E. subsinuatum (Fig. 4a). Entoloma rhodopolium clades-I and III were classified into B1 group on the phylogram (Fig. 3). The clade-I was genetically close to E. majaloides, whereas the clade-III was completely separated from other known species, although it is relatively close to E. lupinum (Fig. 4b). Edible E. sarcopum (B2 group) was distinct from the three E. rhodopolium clades. Next, RPB2 locus was analyzed. The result of RPB2 phylogenetic analysis was very similar to that of ITS analysis (Fig. 5). Entoloma rhodopolium mushrooms we collected were classified into the three clades, all of which were segregated from other known Entoloma species. The resolution power of ITS for molecular phylogenetic study was higher than that of RPB2 within E. rhodopolium and its related species. MEGA software was also used for the phylogenetic analysis of ITS region to compare our result with Kokkonen’s result, because MEGA can produce the same high quality data as PhyML or RAxML, and the recent analysis by Kokkonen was performed by the software. Three Japanese E. rhodopolium clades were distinctly separated each other. The analysis also supported the separation of E. rhodopolium clade-I from E. majaloides, the clade-II from E. sinuatum, E. subsinuatum and E. eminens, and the clade-III from E. lupinum (Fig. 4c). MEGA analysis also revealed that p-distance between E. lacus (clade-I) and E. majaloides, E. subrhodopolium (clade-II) and E. sinuatum, and E. pseudorhodopolium (clade-III) and E. lupinum were 3.1 ± 0.1, 7.9 ± 0.3, 4.9 ± 0.1 (%), respectively (Figs 3 and S3). Taken together, we here describe the three clades as new species. We name Entoloma lacus, E. subrhodopolium, and E. pseudorhodopolium for the E. rhodopolium clades-I, -II, and -III, respectively. We kept a word ‘rhodopolium’ for clades-II and -III, because these species have been considered E. rhodopolium in Japan for a long time.

Figure 3

Layout of the phylogram obtained from maximum-likelihood analysis of ITS region using CLC genomic workbench software. P-distance between the specific species were shown in the figure. Detailed p-distances were described in the supplemental information (Fig. S3).

Figure 4

Phylogenetic trees from maximum likelihood analysis of ITS sequences. Bootstrap values are shown at each node as percentage (90 means 90% of replicates). (a) and (b) trees obtained from the analysis using CLC genomic workbench software. (c) A tree from MEGA7 analysis where all sites were used for gap/missing sites.

Figure 5

Phylogenetic tree from maximum likelihood analysis of RPB2 sequence. Bootstrap values (%) are shown at each node.

PCR-RFLP analysis

Based on the results of the molecular phylogenetic studies, PCR-RFLP method was developed to discriminate poisonous Japanese E. rhodopolium clades and edible E. sarcopum. We selected MslI, DdeI, and HincII/HaeIII for RFLP after in silico simulation. Cleavage sites of the restriction enzymes in the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 region is shown in Fig. S4. PCR reaction using primer pairs ITS1F/ITS4 produced a 1,075-bp band (Fig. 6a). When MslI was used, the enzyme digested the PCR product from edible E. sarcopum, but not from E. lacus (E. rhodopolium clade-I), E. subrhodopolium (E. rhodopolium clade-II), and E. pseudorhodopolium (E. rhodopolium clade-III) (Fig. 6b). DdeI digestion of E. sarcopum sample produced a distinct pattern showing 250-, 296-, and 366-bp bands along with weak bands at less than 100 bp. In contrast, Entoloma lacus (clade-I) gave a band at 690 bp and weak bands from 65 to 146 bp, which was distinct from the clades-II and III (Fig. 6c). However, E. subrhodopolium (clade-II) and E. pseudorhodopolium (clade-III) showed similar band patterns in DdeI digestion. Next, we performed HincII/HaeIII double digestion. Entoloma pseudorhodopolium (clade-III) with a band at 502 bp was distinguished from E. lacus (clade-I, 645 bp), E. subrhodopolium (clade-II, 645 bp) and edible E. sarcopum (802 bp), as shown in Fig. 6d. Together, edible E. sarcopum and each three E. rhodopolium clades (E. lacus, E. subrhodopolium, E. pseudorhodopolium) were identified by the PCR-RFLP method.

Figure 6

Results of PCR-RFLP using the ITS region. (a) PCR amplification of mushroom samples using universal primers. (b) MslI (5′-CAYNN|NNRTG-3′) digested only edible E. sarcopum (5′-CATTG|GTATG-3′) mushrooms, but not Japanese E. rhodopolium clades (5′-CTYTG|RTATG-3′). The second nucleotide from 5′-terminus was ‘A’ in edible E. sarcopum and ‘T’ in poisonous E. rhodopolium clades. MslI digestion of PCR products in A. Edible E. sarcopum shows two clear bands and a smeared 80-bp band. (c) DdeI digestion of PCR products in A. Entoloma sarcopum shows three bands around 250 to 366 bp. Entoloma rhodopolium clade-I shows a distinct larger band at 690 bp, which is different from the other clades. (d) HincII/HaeIII digestion, Entoloma rhodopolium clade-III shows a band at 502 bp, instead of 645 bp (E. rhodopolium clades-I and -II) and 802 bp (E. sarcopum).

Short-length PCR-RFLP analysis

We examined a short-length PCR-RFLP analysis for cooked foods, in which the target sequence was located in the ITS2 region containing MslI site. Three E. sarcopum samples and two Japanese E. rhodopolium samples were used in this experiment. The samples were treated with heat for 30 min and then treated with artificial gastric fluid for 30 min. The PCR products (214 bp length) of ITS2 region were subjected to MslI digestion. Result of gel electrophoresis revealed that an intact band at 214 bp disappeared in E. sarcopum (KUB-201, -202, and -203), whereas the band was kept in our E. subrhodopolium (KUB-1) and E. lacus (KUB-104) as shown in Fig. 5S. This result shows that edible E. sarcopum and poisonous E. rhodopolium species can be detected and distinguished even in cooked food residues. Using quasi-mixed samples, we next tested whether a small portion of poisonous E. subrhodopolium could be detected in a large portion of edible mixed mushrooms. The PCR product was obtained from all samples (Fig. 6S, left panel). After MslI digestion, samples that contained E. subrhodopolium (samples 2, 4, 5, and 7) retained the intact band, whereas the others (samples 1, 3, and 6) were digested by the enzyme (Fig. 6S, right panel). This indicates that even cooked and ingested food samples contaminated with a small amount of E. subrhodopolium can be detected.

To clarify the relationship between toxicity and Japanese E. rhodopolium clades (E. lacus, E. subrhodopolium, E. subrhodopolium), we analyzed mushroom samples collected from four cases of poisoning in the year 2015, all of which were morphologically identified as E. rhodopolium. Samples-1, 2, and 4 were E. pseudorhodopolium (clade-III), and sample-3 was E. subrhodopolium (clade-II). All samples were subjected to the PCR-RFLP analysis. The result shows that those clades are poisonous species (Fig. 7). We could not conclude that E. lacus is toxic because we haven’t collected it from poisoning cases. Further case studies need to be done.

Figure 7

Analysis of recovered Japanese E. rhodopolium samples from the case of poisoning. Four samples recovered were examined to distinguish edible from three poisonous species by the short-PCR-RFLP. Classification of four samples were performed by PCR-RFLP and described in the table. Sample-4 considered mixed mushrooms.


(Japan clade-I)

Entoloma lacus Kondo, sp. nov. Figs 1, 2, 1S

MycoBank MB 818059

Typification: Holotype, Japan, Tokyo, Hachioji-city, Naganuma Park. 35° 38′ 19″ N, 139° 21′ 54″ E, Oct. 1 2011, K. Kondo, KUB-110 (holotype NIHS).


Entoloma lacus grows in a moist mixed forest or wooded area near Quercus serrata, Quercus acutissima, and Pinus densiflora in October.

Etymology: lacus (Latin) refers to hollow stipe.

Pileus 6.5 cm in diameter (generally 4–8 cm), almost flat, light brown with striations in the marginal region, center of pileus slightly umbonate, smooth, slightly viscid when wet, margin undulate, hygrophanous. Lamellae pinkish brown, moderately crowded with free gills, adnate, edge even. Stipe 7.5 cm long (generally 5–10 cm), 0.6–0.8 cm wide (generally 0.6–1.1 cm), slightly light brown, fragile, hollow, fibrillose. Context in pileus concolorous, slightly pinkish brown, in stipe white to light brown. Spores 5–6-angled, 7.1-7.3-8.1/6.2-6.8-7.1 μm, Q = 1.0-1.1–1.2 (n = 20). Basidia 2- or 3-spored, 28–32 × 14–16 μm. (n = 7). Cheilocystidia occasional, 33–41 × 8–12 μm. (n = 5). cylindrical, straight to flexuous. Pileipellis hyphae hyaline, long and narrow, clavate. Stipitipellis terminal cells long clavate in bundles. Clamps present, Smell indistinct, slightly nitrous, unpleasant when well matured. Taste not bitter.

Comments: E. lacus may be a rare species and grow in a restricted area. Although it resembles E. subrhodopolium and E. pseudorhodopolium described below, E. lacus is distinctively smaller and has cystidia. Entoloma lacus is genetically close to, but distinctive from a stout species E. majaloides. Entoloma lacus does not have a darker umbo.

(Japan clade-II)

Entoloma subrhodopolium Kondo & Nagasawa sp. nov. Figs 1, 2, 1S, 2S

MycoBank MB 818058.

Typification: Holotype, Japan, Yamagata, Chitoseyama, within 1 km of 38° 13′ 52″ N, 140° 21′ 45″ E, Oct. 2008, K. KONDO, KUB-1, (holotype NIHS).

ITS_LN088033, RPB2_LN148032

Entoloma subrhodopolium grows in a moist mixed forest near Quercus serrata, Quercus acutissima, and Pinus densiflora in late September to October.

Etymology: a word ‘rhodopolium’ was kept because it has been considered Entoloma rhodopolium in Japan for a long time.

Pileus 9.5 cm in diameter (generally 4–10 cm), almost flat, slightly depressed in the center or broadly convex to applanate, brown, smooth, slightly viscid when wet, hygrophanous margin, no striations. Lamellae pinkish brown or brown, moderately crowded with short free gills. Sinuate (depressed around the stipe), edge even. Stipe 7.5 cm long (generally 6–10 cm), 1.0 cm wide (generally 0.8–1.4 cm), yellowish brown with white apex, fragile or sometimes stout, fibrillose. Context in pileus concolorous, white to slightly yellowish brown, in stipe white to light yellow. Spores 5-6-angled, 6.3-8.2-8.9/6.3-7.2-8.1 μm, Q = 1.0-1.1-1.2 (n = 20). Basidia 2- or 3-spored, 25–30 × 13–15 μm. (n = 5). Cystidia not observed. Pileipellis hyphae hyaline, relatively short and broad, or fusoid-ventricose, terminal cells somewhat broad cylindrical. Stipitipellis terminal cells long to short clavate in bundles. Clamps present, Smell indistinctive or nitrous and slightly unpleasaqnt odor when well matured. Taste not bitter.

Comments: E. subrhodopolium is genetically close to E. sinuatum, however, the latter is a stout and has a large ivory white pileus. Entoloma subrhodopolium is morphologically close to E. pseudorhodopolium but the latter has usually umbo at the center of pileus.

(Japan clade-III)

Entoloma pseudorhodopolium Kondo & Nagasawa sp. nov. Figs 1, 2, 1S, 2S

MycoBank MB818057.

Typification: Holotype, Japan, Niigata, Tainai-city, Tainaidaira, within 2 km of 38° 1′ 22″ N, 139° 30′ 4″ E, Oct. 2011, K. KONDO, KUB-102 (holotype NIHS).

ITS_LN088042, RPB2_LN148040

Entoloma pseudorhodopolium grows in a moist mixed forest near Quercus serrata, Quercus acutissima, and Pinus densiflora in late September to October.

Etymology: a word ‘rhodopolium’ was kept because it has been considered Entoloma rhodopolium in Japan for a long time.

Pileus 5.8 cm in diameter (generally 4–12 cm), almost flat, slightly subconical in the center, umbonate, depressed, light brown, smooth, slightly viscid when wet, hygrophanous margin. Lamellae white but slightly brownish, moderately crowded with free gills. Sinuate (depressed around the stipe), edge uneven. Stipe 8.0 cm long (generally 5–10 cm), 0.8–1.2 cm wide (generally 0.6–1.2 cm), white to light brown with white apex, fragile or stout, fibrillose. Context in pileus concolorous, white to slightly brown, in stipe white to light yellow or brown. Spores 5-6-angled, 6.3-7.3-8.9/5.4-6.4-8.0 μm, Q = 1.0-1.2-1.4 (n = 18). Basidia 2- or 3-spored, 25–32 × 13–15 μm. (n = 5). Cystidia not observed. Pileipellis hyphae hyaline, relatively long and broad, terminal cells somewhat cylindrical, fusoid. Stipitipellis terminal cells long to short clavate in bundles. Clamps present, Smell indistinctive or nitrous and somewhat unpleasant odor when wet. Taste not bitter.

Comments: E. pseudorhodopolium is genetically close to E. lupinum, but the latter is stout with a grey-brown pileus, not with a cork or reddish-brown pileus like E. pseudorhodopolium. In addition, E. lupinum has cheliocyctidia. Entoloma pseudorhodopolium is morphologically similar to E. subrhodopolium. If the two species grow together, it would be rather difficult to distinguish each other, although E. subrhodopolium’s pileus is usually umbonate at the center.

Habitat of the four Entoloma species described above and below: they grow in broad-leaves trees of a mixed forest or wooden area, including Quercus crispula and Quercus serrate during September to October.

Entoloma sarcopum Nagas. & Hongo. Reports of the Tottori Mycological Institute 37: 2 (1999)22.

MycoBank MB459971.

Synonyms: Rhodophyllus crassipes (Imazeki & Toki) Imazeki & Hongo, Journal of Japanese Botany 32: 146 (1957). Mycobank MB305221. Entoloma crassipes Imazeki & Toki, Bulletin of the Government Forest Experimental Station Meguro 67: 39 (1954). Mycobank MB282657.

KUB-205 (NIHS, a reference species in this article), Fig. 1.

ITS_LN088067, RPB2_LN148048

Entoloma sarcopum grows in a moist mixed forest near Quercus serrata, Quercus acutissima, and Pinus densiflora in late September to October.

Specimens (KUB-133-136) were used to identify the sequence of KUB-205. The specimens were considered E. sarcopum by comparing with holotype (TFM-F2947).

The species is usually large and strong but rarely small.

Pileus 8–10 cm in diameter, slightly subconical in the center, brown or darker brown, hygrophanous, fibrillose when dry, pruinose, slightly umbonate at the center, larger and thicker than Entoloma rhodopolium. Lamellae white to yellowish brown, moderately crowded, edge even to uneven. Stipe 10–15 cm long, 1.2–2.2 cm wide, white to light yellowish brown, solid, fibrillose. Context in pileus concolorous, white to slightly yellowish brown, in stipe white to light brown. Spores 5-6-angled, 8.0-8.2-8.9/6.3-7.0-8.0 μm, Q = 1.1-1.2-1.2 (n = 18). Basidia 2- or 3-spored, 25–27 × 10–13 μm. (n = 3). Cystidia not observed or rarely. Pileipellis hyphae hyaline, relatively long, clavate, terminal cells cylindrical. Stipitipellis terminal cells long clavate in bundles. Clamps present, Smell indistinctive or nitrous and somewhat unpleasant odor when wet. Taste strongly bitter even when cocked.

Comments: E. sarcopum grows in broad-leaves trees of a mixed forest or wooden area, including Fagaceae Quercus crispula and Quercus serrate during September to October together with E. subrhodopolium and E. pseudorhodopolium. Entoloma sarcopum has usually a larger pileus (13 cm–18 cm) and long thick stipe (15 cm>), however, when E. sarcopum grows smaller, it would be difficult to distinguish E. sarcopum from the latter two species.


In northern Europe, E. rhodopolium has been well studied and are now included in the subgenus Rhodopolia by Kokkonen. He reported boreal Entoloma species in Finland and introduced a neotype of E. rhodopolium. The aim of this study is to classify our Japanese E. rhodopolium clades and compare them with true European E. rhodopolium, and then to develop an easy-to-use identification method to prevent food poisoning caused by E. rhodopolium species. The molecular phylogenetic studies show that Japanese E. rhodopolium clades-I, -II, and III are distinct from European E. rhodopolium, North American E. aff. rhodopolium, E. nidorosum and other known Entoloma species. The result indicates our E. rhodopolium clades are new species. We named them E. lacus, E. subrhodopolium and E. pseudorhodopolium, respectively. this may help study the taxonomy of complex Entoloma species worldwide, indicating that there is morphological diversity within one species. To date, we have not collected true European E. rhodopolium in Japan. There have been no reports on mushroom poisoning by true E. rhodopolium. The fact raises a new question about which species are toxic among Japanese E. rhodopolium clades. Since last year, we analyzed mushroom samples recovered from the case of food poisoning, and found that at least E. subrhodopolium (Japanese E. rhodopolium clade-II) and E. pseudorhodopolium (clade-III) considered poisonous. Poisoning by E. lacus (clade-I) has not been reported. We collected E. lacus at one local area in the suburbs of Tokyo. E. lacus might be a minor species. As a result, we cannot tell whether or not this is edible or poisonous at this moment. KUB-2, 206, and 207 formed another clade, which might be new species. However, we did not define these species because we do not have whole fruit bodies to describe holotype after our extensive experiments.

Next, we show that the PCR-RFLP method can distinguish three Japanese E. rhodopolium clades (i.e. E. lacus, E. subrhodopolium, and E. pseudorhodopolium) from E. sarcopum when fresh samples were used. When this method is used before ingesting, it can reduce the risk of ingesting poisonous species. In cooked and ingested food residues, however, we could not distinguish between edible E. sarcopum and poisonous E. lacus, E. subrhodopolium, and E. pseudorhodopolium because of DNA degradation. To prevent mushroom poisoning, discrimination between edible and toxic mushrooms in food residues is more important and essential. Therefore, the short-length PCR-RFLP method was developed. Even samples boiled with heat and ingested with artificial gastric fluid were detected. In KUB-201, it retained a weak intact band, therefore, digestion may have not completed, or KUB-201 may have our E. rhodopolium. At any rate, poisonous mushrooms were not identified as edible mushrooms mistakenly. In addition, this method can detect a small amount (eg. 20 mg) of our E. rhodopolium mushrooms in a mixed edible mushroom sample (eg. 380 mg) that contained species such as L. edodes, A. bisporus, G. frondosa, P. eryngii, and P. nameko, which indicates the usefulness of short-length PCR-RFLP. We finally checked the sequences of European species using NCBI data sets and whether MslI can digest European E. rhodopolium, E. aff. rhodopolium, E. nidorosum, E. majaloides, E. inusitatum, and E. sericatum. We found that they would give different band patterns each other. The four enzymes, MslI, DdeI, and HincII/HaeIII, are also useful for PCR-RFLP in European species.

In conclusion, we found three new Entoloma rhodopolium-related species by the molecular phylogenetic studies. Base on the studies, the identification method was developed using PCR-RFLP, which worked well. Our results may help to classify complex Entoloma species in the world, and to reduce food poisoning by Entoloma mushrooms.


Fungal sampling, DNA isolation, PCR, sequencing and dataset assembly

To examine genetic variations, we collected E. rhodopolium, E. sinuatum and E. sarcopum mushrooms from various regions in Japan, from Hokkaido (northern) to Shimane (southwestern) to cover genetic variations among locations (Table 1S). Entoloma rhodopolium were morphologically identified based on the comparison with the neotype reported by Kokkonen13 and our observations. Additionally, two samples that were considered E. sinuatum and nine of E. sarcopum, were collected. Genomic DNA was extracted using DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen) or by the CTAB method following grinding in liquid nitrogen.

PCR and alignment

Two markers, internal-transcribed spacers (ITS) and RNA polymerase subunit II (RPB2), were used. The sequencing primers for ITS were ITS-1F and ITS-423,24. The primers for RPB2 were RPB2-6F and RPB2-7R for the first PCR, and RPB2-i6F and RPB2-i7R for the second nested PCR8. PCR amplification was performed in a 50 μL reaction volume: 1 μL primers (final 0.5–1 μM), 10 μL 10 × PCR buffer, 4 μL dNTP (200–400 μM), 5 μL DNA template (50 μg), 1 μL KOD-FX or KOD-FX neo (1.0U, Toyobo, Japan), and sterile MilliQ water. The PCR reaction conditions used for ITS were: 3 min initial incubation at 95 °C, followed by 45 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min. The first PCR conditions for RPB2 were: 3 min initial incubation at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 61 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 1 min. The second nested PCR conditions for RPB2 were 3 min initial incubation at 95 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 95 °C for 30 s, 51 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s. Sequences obtained were aligned using the MUSCLE25,26 multiple sequence alignment programs in CLC Genomics Workbench ver.8.5 (CLC Bio, Aarhus, Denmark) as described in the Molecular phylogeny section below. For alignment of these Entoloma species, datasets from our study and sequences from the NCBI database were used, and the sequences were adjusted to the same sequence length. ITS and RPB2 yielded alignment lengths of 926 and 621 bp, respectively. We collected 48 samples of E. rhodopolium, E. sinuatum, and E. sarcopum. From those samples, 37 ITS and 15 RPB2 sequences were obtained.

Molecular phylogeny

Phylogenetic analyses were performed by the maximum likelihood method using a general-time-reversible model with a gamma distribution rate of variable sites in the CLC Genomics Workbench (ver.8.5). Bootstrap values (%) were calculated with 1,000 replicates, and a phylogenic tree was constructed. For the out-groups, two taxa were used; sequences of Clitocybe dealbata and Lyophyllum leucophaeatum were downloaded from NCBI. Phylogenetic trees were rooted by outgroups. For the in-group, a total of 37 Entoloma spp. were sequenced for ITS. Sequences of other Entoloma species were obtained from NCBI. All reference datasets are summarized in Tables 1S and 2S. When two sequences were obtained from a single mushroom (e.g., KUB-127), the sequences were designated as -seq 1 and -seq 2 (e.g., KUB-127-seq 1 and KUB-127-seq 2) in phylogenetic trees. KUB-127-seq 1 and -seq 2 were the same sequence except for a nine-nucleotide insertion or deletion (indel). Other KUB samples, such as KUB-3-seq 1 and–seq 2 also had the same sequence except for a one-nucleotide indel. Two sequences from a single sample were categorized within the same clade. MEGA7 software was also used to compare our data with the previous report. Phylogenetic analysis was performed by the maximum likelihood method using a general-time-reversible model with a gamma distribution rate of invariable sites. Gap/missing sites were used. Bootstrap values (%) were calculated with 500 replicates.

Selection of restriction endonucleases and PCR-RFLP procedure

To select restriction endonucleases, in silico simulation was performed on the In-silico simulation of molecular biology experiments web site (, and proposed restriction endonuclease sites were evaluated using the Genetyx software (ver12, Genetyx Co., Japan). We selected four enzymes (MslI, DdeI, HincII/HaeIII) for PCR-RFLP to discriminate edible from poisonous mushrooms, which is the most important criterion for enzyme selection to identify poisoning mushrooms. Because of the genetic variations, MslI, which recognizes CAYNN|NNRTG (CATTG|GTATG in E. sarcopum), was selected.

PCR-RFLP analysis of ITS region

A quick DNA extraction method was used for the PCR-RFLP analysis. Briefly, mushrooms were washed with MilliQ water, and took an approximately 100-mg portion was placed in a 1.5-mL Eppendorf tube. The mushrooms were homogenated using a BioMasher II in 400 μL PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent, and incubated at 100 C for 10 min. Then, samples were centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 2 min. The supernatant was used as PCR template for PCR-RFLP. PCR amplification for the ITS region was performed using BIOTAQ HS DNA polymerase (Bioline, London, UK) and primers, ITS1 and ITS4. PCR reaction conditions were the same as those in Fungal sampling, DNA isolation, PCR, sequencing and dataset assembly section. For restriction endonuclease reaction, purified PCR product was digested using MslI, DdeI, or a combination of HaeIII and HincII (10U per 1 μg PCR product; FastDigest, ThermoFisher Scientific, MA, USA) for 5 min to 30 min at 37 °C, and the digested product was run on a 3% agarose gel in TAE buffer.

Short-length PCR-RFLP analysis

We applied short-length PCR-RFLP analysis to samples from cooked and/or ingested residues. A target sequence of 214 bp that included the MslI site was amplified, and digested with the endonuclease to discriminate edible mushrooms from poisonous mushrooms. Primers for the short-length PCR-RFLP analysis were Short-F (5′-GCTCTTCTTAAATGCATTAGC-3′) and Short-R (5′-TCGCTTCGTCAACCTG-3′). Mushroom samples (>100 mg) were boiled for 30 min, washed, and then subjected to the artificial gastric fluid [the first fluid for disintegration test (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan)] for 1 h at 37 °C. After washing the sample with MilliQ water two times, 500 μL PrepMan Ultra Sample Preparation Reagent was added to the residue before boiling for 10 min. The supernatant was used for PCR template after centrifugation. PCR product was directly digested with MslI, and the resulting product was visualized on an agarose gel described above. To further distinguish a variety of edible mushrooms from poisonous Entoloma rhodopolium, we made quasi-mixed mushroom sample of Lentinula edodes (Berk.) Pegler (377 mg), Agaricus bisporus (J.E. Lange) Imbach (1,043 mg), Flammulina velutipes (Curt.) Sing. (507 mg), Hypsizygus marmoreus (Peck) H.E. Bigelow (591 mg), Grifola frondosa (Dicks.) Gray (377 mg), Pleurotus eryngii (DC.) Quél. (661 mg), and Pholiota nameko (T. Ito) S. Ito & S. Imai (Pholiota microspora) (985 mg). All of these edible mushrooms were cultured on mushroom beds purchased from supermarket.


  1. 1.

    Noordeloos, M. E. & Morozova, O. V. New and noteworthy Entoloma species from the Primorsky Territory, Russian Far East. Mycotaxon 112, 231–255 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Noordeloos, M. E. Entoloma subgenus Leptonia in Northwestern Europa—I. Introduction and a revision of its section Leptonia. Persoonia 11, 451–471 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Noordeloos, M. E. & Hausknecht, A. The genus Entoloma (Basidiomycetes, Agaricales) of the Mascarenes and Seychelles. Fungal Divers. 27, 111–144 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Noordeloos, M. & Gates, G. M. Preliminary studies in the genus Entoloma in Tasmania - II. Cryptogam. Mycol. 30, 107–140 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Largent, D. L. Entolomatoid fungi of the Pacific Northwest and Alaska. Mad River Press at (1994).

  6. 6.

    Gates, G. M. & Noordeloos, M. Preliminary Studies in the Genus Entoloma in Tasmania – I. Persoonia : 19, 157–226 (2007).

  7. 7.

    Agerer, R. Entoloma sinuatum (Bull. Fr.) Kummer + Salix spec. Descr. Ectomycorrhizae 2, 13–18 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Co-David, D., Langeveld, D. & Noordeloos, M. E. Molecular phylogeny and spore evolution of Entolomataceae. Persoonia Mol. Phylogeny Evol. Fungi 23, 147–176 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Noordeloos, M. E. Entoloma subgenera Entoloma and Allocybe in the Netherlands and adjacent regions with a reconnaissance of its remaining taxa in Europe. Persoonia 11, 153–256 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Morgado, L. N., Noordeloos, M. E., Lamoureux, Y. & Geml, J. Multi-gene phylogenetic analyses reveal species limits, phylogeographic patterns, and evolutionary histories of key morphological traits in Entoloma (Agaricales, Basidiomycota). Persoonia 31, 159–78 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Baroni, T. J. & Matheny, P. B. A Re-Evaluation of Gasteroid and Cyphelloid Species of Entolomataceae from Eastern North America. Harvard Papers in Botany 16, (Harvard University Herbaria, 2011).

  12. 12.

    Kluting, K. L., Baroni, T. J. & Bergemann, S. E. Toward a stable classification of genera within the Entolomataceae: a phylogenetic re-evaluation of the Rhodocybe-Clitopilus clade. Mycologia 106, 1127–42 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kokkonen, K. A survey of boreal Entoloma with emphasis on the subgenus Rhodopolia. Mycol. Prog. 14, 116 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ammirati, J. F., Traquair, J. A. & Horgen, P. A. Poisonous Mushrooms of the Northern United States and Canada. (U of Minnesota Press, 1985) at

  15. 15.

    Kuroda, H. Studies on the Toxic Components of Rhodophyllus rhodopolius-Partial purification and propaties of Hemolysis. Yakugaku Zasshi 108, 221–225 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Kumiko, A., Teruaki, S., Haruhiro, U. N. E. & Yamazaki, M. Studies on the Toxic Component of Rhodophyllus rhodopolius-The biological activities and screening of the toxic principles. Yakugaku Zasshi 107, 971–977 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chapuis, J.-R. Jahresbericht des Verbands toxikologen fur das jahr 1983. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Pilzkd. 62, 196–197 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bocchi, A., Bracchi, P. G., Delbono, G. & Cadonici, O. ‘Segnalazioni di intossicazioni da funghi nel Parmense’ [Report on mushroom poisoning in the Parma area]. Ann. della Fac. di Med. Vet. Univ. di Parma 15, 251–256 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Nilson, S. & Persson, O. Fungi of Northern Europe 2 Gill - Fungi. at (1977).

  20. 20.

    Lamaison, J.-L. & Polese, J.-M. The Great Encyclopedia of Mushrooms by Jean Marie Polese, Jean-Louis Lamaison, Jean-Marie Polese | 9780841602694 | Get Textbooks | New Textbooks | Used Textbooks | College Textbooks - at (2005).

  21. 21.

    Maeta, K. et al. Rapid species identification of cooked poisonous mushrooms by using real-time PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 3306–9 (2008).

  22. 22.

    Nagasawa, E. & Hongo, T. Entoloma sarcopum nom. nov. for E. crassipes and Rhodophyllus crassipes. Reports Tottori Mycol. Inst. 37, 1–6 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Gardes, M. & Bruns, T. D. ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes - application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol. Ecol. 2, 113–118 (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    White, T. J., Bruns, T. D., Lee, S. B. & Taylor, J. W. PCR Protocols. (Elsevier, 1990)

  25. 25.

    Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5, 113 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, 1792–7 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by Health Labor Sciences Research Grants (H24-shokuhin-ippan-007 and H27-shokuhin-ippan-007). We thank Dr. Tsuyoshi Hosoya (National Museum of Nature and Science) for helpful suggestion on taxonomy. We also thank Makoto Hashiya (Toyama Central Botanical Garden), Masayuki Sato (Hokkaido Institute of Public Health), Noriyuki Matsumoto (Niigata Prefectural Forest Research Institute), Yoshimasa Kasahara (Yamagata Prefectural Institute of Public Health), and Mountainous Region Research Center in Shimane Prefecture for mushroom collection.

Author information




K.K. and E.N. designed research; K.S., S.O., K.N., K.S., A.N., T.I. and N.F. carried out experiments; K.K., S.O. and K.N. analyzed the data; K.K., R.T., E.N. and T.N.-M. discussed the results; and K.K., K.N. and S.O. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazunari Kondo.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kondo, K., Nakamura, K., Ishigaki, T. et al. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of new Entoloma rhodopolium-related species in Japan and its identification method using PCR-RFLP. Sci Rep 7, 14942 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading

  • Delimiting species in Basidiomycota: a review

    • Bin Cao
    • , Danny Haelewaters
    • , Nathan Schoutteten
    • , Dominik Begerow
    • , Teun Boekhout
    • , Admir J. Giachini
    • , Sergio P. Gorjón
    • , Nina Gunde-Cimerman
    • , Kevin D. Hyde
    • , Martin Kemler
    • , Guo-Jie Li
    • , Dong-Mei Liu
    • , Xin-Zhan Liu
    • , Jorinde Nuytinck
    • , Viktor Papp
    • , Anton Savchenko
    • , Kyryll Savchenko
    • , Leho Tedersoo
    • , Bart Theelen
    • , Marco Thines
    • , Michal Tomšovský
    • , Merje Toome-Heller
    • , Judith P. Urón
    • , Annemieke Verbeken
    • , Alfredo Vizzini
    • , Andrey M. Yurkov
    • , Juan Carlos Zamora
    •  & Rui-Lin Zhao

    Fungal Diversity (2021)

  • Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota

    • Mao-Qiang He
    • , Rui-Lin Zhao
    • , Kevin D. Hyde
    • , Dominik Begerow
    • , Martin Kemler
    • , Andrey Yurkov
    • , Eric H. C. McKenzie
    • , Olivier Raspé
    • , Makoto Kakishima
    • , Santiago Sánchez-Ramírez
    • , Else C. Vellinga
    • , Roy Halling
    • , Viktor Papp
    • , Ivan V. Zmitrovich
    • , Bart Buyck
    • , Damien Ertz
    • , Nalin N. Wijayawardene
    • , Bao-Kai Cui
    • , Nathan Schoutteten
    • , Xin-Zhan Liu
    • , Tai-Hui Li
    • , Yi-Jian Yao
    • , Xin-Yu Zhu
    • , An-Qi Liu
    • , Guo-Jie Li
    • , Ming-Zhe Zhang
    • , Zhi-Lin Ling
    • , Bin Cao
    • , Vladimír Antonín
    • , Teun Boekhout
    • , Bianca Denise Barbosa da Silva
    • , Eske De Crop
    • , Cony Decock
    • , Bálint Dima
    • , Arun Kumar Dutta
    • , Jack W. Fell
    • , József Geml
    • , Masoomeh Ghobad-Nejhad
    • , Admir J. Giachini
    • , Tatiana B. Gibertoni
    • , Sergio P. Gorjón
    • , Danny Haelewaters
    • , Shuang-Hui He
    • , Brendan P. Hodkinson
    • , Egon Horak
    • , Tamotsu Hoshino
    • , Alfredo Justo
    • , Young Woon Lim
    • , Nelson Menolli
    • , Armin Mešić
    • , Jean-Marc Moncalvo
    • , Gregory M. Mueller
    • , László G. Nagy
    • , R. Henrik Nilsson
    • , Machiel Noordeloos
    • , Jorinde Nuytinck
    • , Takamichi Orihara
    • , Cheewangkoon Ratchadawan
    • , Mario Rajchenberg
    • , Alexandre G. S. Silva-Filho
    • , Marcelo Aloisio Sulzbacher
    • , Zdenko Tkalčec
    • , Ricardo Valenzuela
    • , Annemieke Verbeken
    • , Alfredo Vizzini
    • , Felipe Wartchow
    • , Tie-Zheng Wei
    • , Michael Weiß
    • , Chang-Lin Zhao
    •  & Paul M. Kirk

    Fungal Diversity (2019)


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing