Article | Open

Yucasin DF, a potent and persistent inhibitor of auxin biosynthesis in plants

  • Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 13992 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14332-w
  • Download Citation
Published online:


The plant hormone auxin plays a crucial role in plant growth and development. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), a natural auxin, is mainly biosynthesized by two sequential enzyme reactions catalyzed by TAA1 and YUCCA (YUC). TAA1 is involved in the conversion of tryptophan to IPA, and YUC catalyzes the conversion of IPA to IAA. We previously demonstrated that yucasin inhibits AtYUC1 enzyme activity and suppress high-auxin phenotype of YUC overexpression plants, although yucasin displayed weak effects on the auxin-related phenotype of wild-type plants. To develop more potent YUC inhibitors, various derivatives of yucasin were synthesized, and their structure–activity relationships were investigated. Yucasin difluorinated analog (YDF) (5-[2,6-difluorophenyl]-2,4-dihydro-[1,2,4]-triazole-3-thione) was identified to be a more potent YUC inhibitor than the original yucasin. YDF caused an auxin-deficient phenotype in Arabidopsis wild-type plants that was restored with auxin application. YDF was found to be highly stable regarding metabolic conversion in vivo, accounting for the potent activity of the inhibition of IAA biosynthesis in planta. Photoaffinity labeling experiments demonstrated that yucasin-type inhibitors bind to the active site of AtYUC1. YDF is a promising auxin biosynthesis inhibitor and is a useful chemical tool for plant biology and agrochemical studies.


The plant hormone auxin is a master regulator for plant growth and development. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), the predominant naturally occurring auxin, regulates diverse physiological processes in almost every aspect of plant growth and development, including embryo development, vascular differentiation, apical dominance and tropic responses to light and gravity1,2,3,4. The hormonal action of auxin can be spatiotemporally regulated by cellular auxin distribution that is modulated by the biosynthesis, directional transport and inactivation of auxin3,5,6. Auxin biosynthesis plays a crucial role in the initial step of the establishment of cellular auxin distribution in plants2,5.

IAA is mainly biosynthesized from tryptophan by two sequential enzymatic reactions consisting of TRYPTOPHAN AMINOTRANSFERASE of ARABIDOPSIS 1 (TAA1) and YUCCA (YUC) of the indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPA) pathway (Fig. 1). TAA1 converts Trp to IPA, and YUC catalyzes the oxidative decarboxylation of IPA to produce IAA in the IPA pathway7,8. TAA1 and YUC orthologs are widely found in diverse land plants, such as the liverworts, mosses, ferns and vascular plants, and the IPA pathway is believed to be main IAA biosynthetic route in land plants2,9,10. YUC enzymes encode flavin monooxygenase and a part of a large gene family consisting of 11 members in Arabidopsis11,12. Genetic studies have demonstrated that YUC functions as the rate-limiting enzyme of the IPA pathway, indicating the YUCs play a crucial role in developmental processes regulated by cellular IAA levels5,13. Molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of cellular IAA levels still remain unclear due to the multiple regulatory steps involving the biosynthesis, directional transport and inactivation of auxin. In addition, the redundant functions of the large family of YUC genes prevent the access of reverse genetic approaches to understand the physiological role of local IAA biosynthesis. IAA-deficient mutants such as the taa1 tar2 double mutant show severe impaired phenotypes8; therefore, it would be difficult to spatiotemporally analyze the role of IAA biosynthesis at a specific developmental stage.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Auxin biosynthetic pathways and the structures of metabolic intermediates. indole-3-butyric acid (IBA), tryptamine (TAM), indole-3-acetaldoxime (IAOx), indole-3-acetonitrile (IAN), and indole-3-acetoamide (IAM).

Chemical biology approaches using small molecules have been effective at complementing genetic and biochemical approaches14,15. The function of target proteins can be spatiotemporally modulated by small molecules in any tissue or cell. Furthermore, small molecules can overcome the redundant activity of cognate genes and therefore can be an effective tool for studying diverse plant species inaccessible via genetic approaches. Recently, several auxin biosynthesis inhibitors targeting the IPA pathway have been discovered16,17,18. L-α-aminooxyphenylpropionic acid (AOPP) and its potent derivative pyruvamine (PVM) were reported to be TAA inhibitors18. TAA is pyridoxal phosphate (PLP)-dependent enzyme whose aminooxy moiety can bind PLP to inhibit oxime formation of PLP with substrate. PVM inhibits IAA biosynthesis and results in a severe auxin-deficient phenotype in several plants. L-Kynurenine (L-Kyn) has been reported to be a competitive inhibitor of TAA1 by chemical library screening18,19. L-Kyn is a metabolite of L-tryptophan via tryptophan dioxygenase19. Kakei et al. demonstrated that the phenyl boronic acid derivatives 4-biphenylboronic acid (BBo) and 4-phenoxyphenylboronic acid (PPBo) displayed very potent inhibition of the YUC enzyme and then repressed IAA biosynthesis, conferring an auxin-deficient phenotype to Arabidopsis plants20. In a previous study, we demonstrated that yucasin (5-[4-chlorophenyl]-2,4-dihydro-[1,2,4]-triazole-3-thione) was identified as a YUC inhibitor from synthetic chemical library. Yucasin effectively reduces the endogenous IAA level of maize and suppresses high-auxin phenotypes in Arabidopsis YUC overexpression plants. Yucasin also enhances the auxin-deficient phenotypes of sav3–2/taa1 mutant plants. However, Arabidopsis wild-type plants treated with yucasin do not show typical auxin-deficient phenotypes21.

In this study, we synthesized various analogs of yucasin and investigated their structure–activity relationships (SARs). Among the various analogs, we identified a yucasin difluorinated analog (YDF: 1) (5-[2,6-difluorophenyl]-2,4-dihydro-[1,2,4]-triazole-3-thione) as a potent, reversible YUC inhibitor using YUC-overexpressing transgenic plants harboring an auxin-responsive DR5::GUS reporter system. YDF caused an auxin-deficient phenotype in Arabidopsis plants and in lower land plants such as mosses and liverworts. The auxin-deficient phenotype caused by YDF was restored with auxin application. Based on the SAR results, we designed photoaffinity analogs of yucasin. Photoaffinity labeling experiments of AtYUC6 confirmed that yucasin-type inhibitors bind to the active site of YUC6 in competition with the substrate. Finally, we simultaneously blocked the IPA and CYP79B auxin biosynthesis pathways using a combination of the inhibitors and mutants for auxin biosynthesis and signaling, and the results suggested auxin null phenotype of Arabidopsis plants.


Evaluation of inhibitory activity for yucasin analogs using AtYUC6 overexpression plants

Yucasin was identified as an inhibitor of the YUC enzyme in the IPA pathway. Yucasin suppressed high-auxin phenotypes of Arabidopsis YUC overexpression plants, but showed weak inhibitory activity on root growth of wild-type seedling (Supplemental Fig. S5)21. To develop a more potent auxin biosynthesis inhibitor, we synthesized various analogs of yucasin. In our previous study, the 1,2,4-triazole-3(4 H)-thione moiety of yucasin was found to be essential for the inhibition of the YUC enzyme21. On the other hand, the modification of the phenyl group may increase the ability of yucasin derivatives to bind to YUC enzymes. Therefore, we focused on the modification of the aromatic moiety of yucasin and synthesized analogs, as shown in Fig. 2 and Supplemental Fig. S1.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Structures of yucasin analogs and their inhibitory activity on DR5::GUS expression induced by YUC6 overexpression. (A) 4-d-old DR5::GUS pMDC7::YUC6 seedlings were incubated in the presence of 5 µM ER and 10 µM inhibitors for 20 h. ER-induced YUC6 overexpression resulted in the accumulation of endogenous IAA and then promoted DR5::GUS expression. The induced GUS enzyme activity was fluorometrically determined and indicated as the relative values (%). Values are the means ± S.D. of three independent experiments. (B) Structures of yucasin analogs. The structures of all compounds are indicated in Supplemental Fig. S1.

In the initial evaluations for yucasin analogs, we measured the auxin-responsive DR5::GUS reporter expression that is up-regulated by endogenous IAA in pMDC7::YUC6 lines22. The auxin-responsive expression of the DR5::GUS reporter was rapidly and specifically regulated by IAA levels (Fig. 2A)23. pMDC7::YUC6, an estradiol (ER)-inducible transgene, overproduced YUC6 enzymes in response to ER and consequently displayed extreme high-auxin phenotypes, as shown in Fig. 3A. ER at 5 μM induced YUC6 expression to accumulate endogenous IAA, resulting in the activation of DR5::GUS expression (Fig. 4C). In this assay system, DR5::GUS in pMDC7::YUC6 lines was incubated for 20 h with the analogs and ER. The induced GUS reporter expression was fluorescently quantified, and the inhibitory activities of the analogs were ranked, as shown in Fig. 2A. Consistent with previous results, the modification of the 1,2,4-triazole-3(4 H)-thione moiety (3638) negated the YUC6 inhibitory activity. However, a clear correlation was not shown between the structural feature and inhibitory activity (Fig. 2 and Supplemental Fig. S1.). In this assay, 13 analogs showed more potent inhibitory activity than did yucasin.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Effects of yucasin DF on wild-type and auxin overexpression plants. (A) Effects of YDF on high-auxin phenotypes resulting from YUC1, YUC2 and YUC6 overexpression. 35S::YUC1 plants were grown for 5 days in 1/2 MS medium in the presence of 20 µM YDF. pMDC7::YUC2 and pMDC7::YUC6 plants were cultured for 5 days in 1/2 MS medium in the presence of 5 µM estradiol (ER) and 20 µM YDF. The images were taken of representative phenotypes. Scale bar = 10 mm. (B) Effects of YDF on wild-type seedlings. The seedlings were grown vertically for 6 days on 1/2 MS agar plates with or without exogenous 10 nM IAA. Scale bar = 10 mm. (C) Inhibition of primary root growth by YDF in the presence or absence of 10 nM IAA. Root length was measured after 6 days of cultivation on vertical 1/2 MS agar plates. Values are the means ± S.D. (n = 30–35).

Figure 4
Figure 4

Effects of yucasin DF on the auxin-responsive gene expression and IAA biosynthesis. (A and B) Effects of YDF on the auxin-responsive gene expression regulated by the SCFTIR1 signaling pathway. (A) The auxin-responsive reporter lines DR5::GUS (upper) and BA3::GUS (bottom) expressed the GUS reporter gene in response to auxin. 5-d-old seedlings were treated with 5 µM IAA and YDF for 6 h. The values in parentheses indicate concentration (µM). (B) 6-d-old DII-VENUS seedlings were incubated with in the presence of YDF or auxinole in 1/2 MS liquid medium for 20 min. IAA (1 μM) was then added to medium, which was then incubated for an additional 40 min. The fluorescent images of root tips were immediately obtained using fluorescence microscopy. Scale bar = 100 µm. (C and D) Effects of YDF on IAA biosynthesis by IPA pathway. (C) 4-d-old DR5::GUS pMDC7::YUC6 and DR5::GUS pMDC7::YUC2 seedlings were incubated in the presence of 5 µM ER and YDF for 20 h. ER-induced YUC overexpression resulted in the accumulation of endogenous IAA and then promoted DR5::GUS expression. (D) 5-d-old DII-VENUS seedlings were incubated in the presence of inhibitors for 6 h. The auxin-dependent degradation of the DII-VENUS fusion protein was monitored by fluorescence microscopy.

We then evaluated the effects of analogs on the phenotype of pMDC7::YUC6 (Fig. 3A and Supplemental Fig. S2). Four-day-old seedlings grown in the presence of ER exhibited extreme high-auxin phenotypes, including growth retardation of primary roots and shoots (Supplemental Fig. S2). Twelve analogs more potent than yucasin in the activation of DR5::GUS (Fig. 2), except for 5, suppressed high-auxin phenotype of pMDC7::YUC6 (Supplemental Fig. S2). Previous studies have demonstrated that yucasin suppressed high-auxin phenotypes in YUC overexpression plants, but wild-type plants treated with yucasin showed faint root growth inhibition (Supplemental Fig. S5)21. Therefore, the effects of analogs (114) on wild-type seedlings were examined. Analogs (313 and YDF) affected the root growth of wild-type seedlings at 50 μM (Fig. 3B and Supplemental Figs S3 and S4). Auxin-deficient phenotypes could be rescued by exogenous auxin application if the defects were derived from the inhibition of IAA synthesis, not by off-target effects of compounds. Exogenous IAA (10–20 nM) was co-applied with analogs to evaluate the specificity of analogs on IAA biosynthesis. Fluorinated, chlorinated and furan analogs (4, 7, 9, 16, YDF) showed reversible, potent inhibition of root growth in wild-type plants at 20 μM (Fig. 3B and Supplemental Fig. S3). L-Kyn was reported to be a competitive TAA inhibitor19. In our assay conditions, 50–100 μM L-Kyn showed an auxin-deficient like phenotype, but this impaired growth was partially recovered by exogenous IAA, implying off-target effects of L-Kyn at 50–100 μM (Supplemental Fig. S4). L-Kyn is the degradation product of L-Trp; therefore, L-Kyn might affect the metabolic pathway of Trp. Similar to L-Kyn, 6 analogs (3, 6, 10, 11, 13 and 14) displayed off-target effects, and the defects could not be rescued by IAA application (Supplemental Fig. S4).

From these selections of the candidates of potent YUC inhibitors, we found that yucasin 2,6-difluorinated (YDF) showed the most potent inhibitory activity in planta without off-target effects on root growth (Fig. 3B,C and Supplemental Fig. S5). In addition, YDF suppressed high-auxin phenotype, which displayed longer hypocotyls and epinastic cotyledons in 35S::YUC1 seedlings (Fig. 3A). The activity of the yucasin 2-monofluorinated analog (YMF: 16) and furan analog (9) was similar but was slightly lower than that of YDF in planta. Therefore, we selected YDF as a promising candidate for the potent and specific inhibition of YUC and further investigated the mode of action of YDF.

Yucasin DF inhibits auxin biosynthesis but not signal transduction processes

To confirm the specificity of YDF on auxin biosynthesis, we assessed the effects of YDF on auxin signaling by using two auxin-responsive reporter lines, DR5::GUS and BA3::GUS (Fig. 4A). The DR5::GUS and BA3::GUS transgene was rapidly induced by exogenous IAA via the auxin-dependent SKP1–CULLIN–F-box (SCF) complex-proteasome pathway. YDF at 100 μM showed no inhibition of DR5::GUS and BA3::GUS induction by exogenously applied IAA (Fig. 4A), but YDF completely repressed DR5::GUS expression by the overexpression of YUC2 and YUC6 enzymes (Fig. 4C). DII-VENUS plants constitutively express the DII-VENUS fusion protein (domain II of Aux/IAA repressor protein fused to the VENUS fluorescent reporter) under the control of the 35S promoter (Fig. 4B and D)24. Auxin rapidly promotes the degradation of Aux/IAA repressors via SCFTIR1 auxin signaling pathway. Therefore, the DII-VENUS reporter has been widely used as an indirect marker to monitor cellular auxin levels. Exogenous 1 μM IAA triggered the rapid degradation of DII-VENUS during 40 min of incubation (Fig. 4B). Auxinole inhibited IAA-induced DII-VENUS degradation. In contrast, YDF did not inhibit the degradation of DII-VENUS induced by exogenous IAA (Fig. 4B). After 6 h of incubation with the chemicals, the TIR1 auxin receptor antagonist, auxinole caused the accumulation of DII-VENUS protein by inhibiting auxin signaling (Fig. 4D)25. L-Kyn and YDF also repressed the degradation of the DII-VENUS protein by blocking endogenous IAA synthesis (Fig. 4D). These results indicate that YDF is specific to the IAA biosynthesis pathway, but does not affect auxin-induced DII-VENUS degradation and auxin-responsive gene expression mediated by the SCFTIR1 auxin signaling pathway.

Yucasin DF causes an auxin-deficient phenotype by inhibiting the IPA pathway

To examine the effects of YDF on the growth of wild-type Arabidopsis plants, seedlings were grown vertically in the presence of YDF for 6 days. YDF showed inhibitory effects on primary root growth (Figs 3B,C, 5A and B), and 50 μM YDF phenocopied the auxin-deficient phenotypes of the auxin biosynthesis quintuple mutant yuc 3 5 7 8 9 (yucQ) (Fig. 5A and B)8,26. This auxin-deficient phenotype of wild type caused by YDF was rescued by IAA application (Fig. 3 and Supplemental Fig. S6). The loss-of-functional taa1 mutant, sav3–1 was more sensitive to YDF than WT, suggesting that YDF targets the IPA pathway in a similar manner as yucasin (Fig. 5A). Arabidopsis has 11 functional YUC genes. The yuc 3 5 7 8 9 quintuple loss-of-function mutant yucQ showed a very severe auxin-deficient phenotype in roots, as these YUC genes specifically function in the roots (Fig. 5A)26. The root phenotype of the yucQ mutant was further repressed by 10 μM YDF treatment (Fig. 5A). However, the root growth of the yucQ mutant was more resistant to 20–50 μM YDF in comparison with wild-type, implying the IPA pathway in yucQ mutant root was completely inhibited by 10 μM YDF.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Effects of yucasin DF on the phenotypes of Arabidopsis auxin biosynthesis and signaling mutants. (A) Effects of YDF on root phenotypes of Arabidopsis auxin biosynthesis mutants. Arabidopsis seedlings were vertically grown for 6 days on 1/2 MS medium containing YDF. Primary root length of wild-type, cyp79b2 79b3, sav3-1/taa1 and yuc3 5 7 8 9 seedlings were measured. The relative root length was shown as the values (%) and a mock-treated root was adjusted to 100%. The actual length (mm) of mock-treated roots were indicated. Box-and-whisker plots show a median (centerline), upper/lower quartiles (box limits) and maximum/minimum (whiskers) n > 15. Statistical significance assessed by Welch’s two sample t-test. Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and mutant at *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01. (B) 6-d-old Arabidopsis wild-type, cyp79b2 79b3, sav3-1/taa1 and yuc3 5 7 8 9 seedlings grown vertically with 50 µM YDF. Scale bar = 10 mm. (C) Effects of YDF on shoot phenotypes of Arabidopsis auxin biosynthesis and signaling mutants. Arabidopsis wild-type, cyp79b2 79b3 and tir1 afb2 seedlings were cultured for 11 days on 1/2 MS plate containing TAA inhibitors [L-kynurenine (L-Kyn) and AONP], YUC inhibitor [YDF] and TIR1 antagonist [auxinole] with or without 0.5 μM IAA. The values in parentheses indicate concentration (µM). The petiole length of the first leaves was shown as relative value (100%) and the actual length (mm) of mock-treated plants. n > 18 Statistical significance assessed by Welch’s two sample t-test. *P < 0.05 and **P < 0.01.

The primary root growth of wild-type seedlings by YDF was fully restored by exogenous 5–10 nM IAA application (Fig. 3B,C and Supplemental Fig. S6), but wavy and slight agravitropic root phenotypes were observed. These root phenotypes were almost recovered by 20 nM IAA and 5 μM indole-3-acetamide (IAM), precursor of IAA (Supplemental Fig. S6). These results imply that optimal auxin concentration was different between root elongation and gravitropism.

We next investigated the effects of biosynthesis inhibitors including YDF on auxin biosynthesis mutants. IAA is mainly biosynthesized by two enzymes (TAA1 and YUC) in a linear IPA pathway. In addition, Arabidopsis has an auxiliary IAA biosynthetic pathway designated as the indole-3-acetaldoxime (IAOx) pathway, which is catalyzed by cytochrome P450 monooxygenase CYP79B5. The chemical inhibition of biological processes, such as signaling and metabolic pathways, are sometimes accompanied by off-target effects, causing misleading experimental results. Off-target effects should especially be carefully considered when the pathway is completely blocked with high concentrations of inhibitors.

To achieve complete inhibition of the IPA pathway without off-target effects, we used a cocktail treatment for the inhibition of the IPA pathway. A cocktail treatment consisting of TAA1 inhibitors L-Kyn, AONP, and the YUC inhibitor YDF would be expected to completely block the IPA pathway (Fig. 5C and Supplemental Fig. S7). Wild-type plants treated with this inhibitor cocktail showed pleotropic defects; however, exogenous auxin application restored these defects (Fig. 5C and Supplemental Fig. S7), suggesting that these defects are not due to off-target effects of inhibitors. The loss-of-functional cyp79b2 79b3 double mutant displayed more severe defects in the presence of YDF, L-Kyn and the biosynthesis inhibitor cocktail (Fig. 5A,C and Supplemental Fig. S7), suggesting that the IAOx pathway might partially complement auxin shortage by the inhibition of the IPA pathway. The tir1 afb2 double mutant lacks two major auxin receptors of the six TIR1/AFB auxin receptors in Arabidopsis. The tir1 afb2 mutant was more sensitive to biosynthesis inhibitors and auxin receptor antagonist, auxinole than wild-type (Fig. 5C). To examine the complete inhibition of auxin action in plants, auxin biosynthesis mutants were co-treated with L-Kyn, YDF, AONP and auxinole (Fig. 5C and Supplemental Fig. S7). Co-application with auxin biosynthesis inhibitors and auxinole caused extreme growth defects in wild type (Fig. 5C and Supplemental Fig. S7). This extreme growth defects of wild-type and mutants were restored by IAA application, suggesting the defects are derived from auxin null phenotype, but not from the toxic effects of inhibitors.

Yucasin DF is stable derivative of yucasin

To unveil the mechanism of the potent activity of YDF in plants, we measured the inhibitory activity of YDF on the recombinant AtYUC1 enzyme (Fig. 6A). Surprisingly, YDF showed lower activity than yucasin. In addition, the yucasin 2-monofluorinated analog (YMF:16) showed more potent inhibition than YDF (Fig. 6A). In our previous study, 20 μM yucasin showed considerable reduction of endogenous IAA levels in 35S::YUC1 after 5 h of incubation; however, yucasin at 20 μM displayed a slight inhibition of endogenous IAA in wild-type plants21. In contrast to the weak effects of yucasin on endogenous IAA levels in wild-type plants, YDF at 20 μM showed potent inhibition in wild-type plants to similar extent to L-Kyn (5 μM) (Fig. 6B). Both 20 μM YDF and 5 μM L-Kyn showed auxin-deficient phenotypes (Fig. 5 and Supplemental Fig. S7), and co-treatment with L-Kyn and YDF showed the most potent inhibition of endogenous IAA levels (Fig. 6B).

Figure 6
Figure 6

Effects of yucasin analogs on YUC1 recombinant enzyme activity and endogenous IAA levels. (A) Recombinant AtYUC1-His enzyme activity. The enzymatic reaction was performed using 0.25 µg of AtYUC1-His enzyme and 20 µM IPA at 35 °C for 30 min. The inhibitor was added at 1 or 10 µM. Values are the means ± S.D. of three independent experiments. (B) 5-d-old wild-type seedlings were incubated with inhibitor in liquid 1/2 MS medium for 10 h. The seedlings (n = 5–8) were pooled for each sample, and three samples were analyzed for each data point. Endogenous IAA levels were measured using LC-MS/MS. Values are the means ± S.D.

Yucasin inhibited the recombinant YUC1 enzyme activity more potent than YDF, but showed very weak activity against the root growth of wild-type seedlings (Supplemental Fig. S5). Yucasin was demonstrated to suppress high-auxin phenotypes caused by the overexpression of YUC1, YUC2, and YUC6 at same concentration range (20−50 μM) as that of YDF21. Thus, it is unlikely that yucasin would be a selective inhibitor of the YUC1 enzyme and not be active on other YUCs. The calculated log P values of yucasin and YDF were also similar (yucasin: 2.75 and YDF: 2.50), implying that the membrane permeability of these compounds are not different. Generally, the imine moiety is readily hydrolyzed to yield aryl hydrazide. An alternative explanation is that yucasin is a metabolically and chemically unstable compound. On the other hand, YDF is more stable in vivo and in vitro for maintaining a constant concentration during incubation.

To confirm the chemical stability of the inhibitors, YDF, YMF, and yucasin were incubated in liquid culture medium, after which the residual amount was measured by HPLC at regular intervals during incubation. YDF was found to be most stable in the medium (Fig. 7A). Seventy-five percent of YDF and 50% of YMF still remained after 6 days of incubation. In contrast, less than 35% of yucasin remained after 6 days (Fig. 7A). These data suggest that the introduction of a fluorine group improves the chemical stability of yucasin-type inhibitors. To examine the metabolic stability of YDF and yucasin, the inhibitors were measured using HPLC after incubation for 18 h in Arabidopsis root cell lysate (Fig. 7B). Consistent with the chemical stability, YDF showed higher metabolic stability in the root cell homogenate. More than 90% of yucasin was metabolically converted; in contrast, 60% of YDF remained unchanged (Fig. 7B and Supplemental Fig. S8). This evidence indicates that YDF is a highly stable yucasin derivative and therefore shows potent inhibitory activity on auxin biosynthesis in planta.

Figure 7
Figure 7

Chemical and metabolic stability of yucasin and fluorinated yucasin. (A) Chemical stability of the inhibitors in culture medium. The inhibitors (100 µM) were incubated in 1/2 MS liquid medium for 6 days at 24 °C under continuous light. The sample was analyzed using HPLC at regular intervals. The residual amount of inhibitor is shown as the relative value (%) compared with the initial amount. (B) Metabolic stability of the inhibitors in root cell lysate. The inhibitors (250 µM) in Arabidopsis root homogenate were incubated for 18 h at 24 °C in the dark. Residual inhibitors were measured using HPLC after the incubation. Values are the means ± S.D.

Yucasin DF inhibits the auxin biosynthesis of lower land plants such as the moss Physcomitrella patens and the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha

The IPA pathway is thought to be the predominant IAA biosynthetic pathway in land plants. The model moss plant Physcomitrella patens contains both TAA and YUC homologs responsible for the IPA pathway in the genome10,27. Auxin regulates the development of protonemata, which is the filamentous tissue of moss9,28. Exogenous IAA promotes the transition from chloronema to caulonema cells and then to the gametophyte. YDF inhibited protonema development (the transition to caulonema cells) and consequently repressed the formation of the gametophyte (Fig. 8A). The exogenous auxins IAA and NAA restored the auxin-deficient protonema phenotype and rescued the formation of the gametophyte (Fig. 8A). The liverwort M. polymorpha has a single TAA gene and two YUC genes. Eklund et al. reported that taa knockout lines showed very severe growth defects in the thallus. Consistent with the phenotype of the taa knockout line10, YDF strongly repressed the growth of the thallus in M. polymorpha (Fig. 8B). This evidence suggests that YDF can modulate IAA biosynthesis in diverse land plants.

Figure 8
Figure 8

Effects of yucasin DF on the growth of the moss Physcomitrella patens and liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. (A) The protonemata of P. patens were placed on BCDAT plates containing 40 µM YDF with or without auxins (1 µM IAA and 2 µM NAA). The plates were cultured at 24 °C for 18 days under continuous light. Scale bar = 5 mm. (B) The gemmae of the liverwort Marchantia polymorpha were cultured on 1M51C plates with YDF for 11 days. Scale bar = 5 mm.

Yucasin directly binds to the active site of the YUC enzyme in competition with the IPA substrate

Yucasin was demonstrated to be a competitive inhibitor of the YUC1 enzyme in in vitro assays. To confirm the competitive binding of yucasin at the substrate binding site of YUC6, we performed photoaffinity labeling approach with the bifunctional photoaffinity yucasin probe (Fig. 9A). The structure-activity study for yucasin revealed that m-substituted analogs (7, 12, and 15) retain YUC inhibitory activity (Fig. 2 and Supplemental Fig. S1 and S2). The bifunctional photoaffinity probe has aryl azido and alkyl azido groups at the m-position of the phenyl ring of yucasin (Fig. 9A). The alkyl azido group can be photostable but specifically reacts with fluorescent groups tagged with triarylphosphine via Staudinger–Bertozzi ligation reaction29. The aryl azido group can be highly photoreactive and then conjugate with neighboring amino acid in the binding site of the target protein (Fig. 9A)30,31. The probe was synthesized and then evaluated using YUC6 and YUC1 overexpression lines. pMDC7::YUC6 and 35S::YUC1 seedlings were grown under darkness with inhibitors. YUC6 and YUC1 overexpression caused the inhibition of hypocotyl elongation, a typical auxin response in etiolated seedlings (Fig. 9B and Supplemental Fig. S9). Both YDF and the probe inhibited high-auxin phenotype in etiolated seedlings and restored hypocotyl elongation (Fig. 9B), indicating that the probe could bind to the YUC6 enzyme. Recombinant YUC6 protein was incubated with the probe with or without the substrate (IPA and phenylpyruvic acid [PPA]) and photoactivated by UV irradiation. The YUC6 protein was precipitated with acidic acetone, after which the excess unreacted probe was removed. The fluorescent BODIPY group tagged with triarylphosphine was incubated with YUC6 protein to ligate with the alkyl azido group of the probe32. The YUC6 protein was analyzed by SDS-PAGE, and the probe-linked YUC6 protein was detected using a fluorescence laser imaging system. A fluorescent signal from the photoaffinity-labeled probe of YUC6 was detected (Fig. 9C, 1st lane from left), but a signal from the probe linked with YUC6 was not detected without photoirradiation (Fig. 9C, 2nd lane). The fluorescent signal disappeared when the probe was photoactivated in the presence of the substrates (Fig. 9C, 3rd and 4th lanes from left). This evidence indicates that yucasin-type inhibitors directly bind to the active site of the YUC enzyme in competition with the substrate.

Figure 9
Figure 9

Photoaffinity labeling experiments of YUC6 by the bifunctional photoreactive yucasin probe. (A) Diagram of photoaffinity labeling experiment by the bifunctional photoreactive yucasin probe. The photoreactive aryl azido group (red) conjugates with YUC6 recombinant protein. After photoaffinity labeling, the alkyl azido group can ligate to the fluorescent phosphine tag in accordance with the Staudinger–Bertozzi reaction. YUC6 was fluorescently tagged by the conjugation with the probe. If the probe competes with the substrate phenylpyruvic acid (PPA) or indole-3-pyruvic acid (IPA) at active site, fluorescently tagged YUC6 cannot be detected. (B) Effects of the probe on high-auxin phenotype of pMDC7::YUC6 etiolated seedlings. The etiolated seedlings were grown in 1/2 MS medium in the presence of inhibitors and 10 µM ER in the dark for 3 days. (C) Fluorescent gel image of SDS-PAGE under 488-nm excitation and 520-nm emission wavelengths. YUC6 was irradiated by UV in the presence of 20 µM probe (1st lane from left), YUC6 was not irradiated in the presence of 20 µM probe (2nd lane), YUC6 was irradiated by UV in the presence of 20 µM probe and 200 µM PPA (3rd lane), and YUC6 was irradiated by UV in the presence of 20 µM probe and 200 µM IPA (4th lane).


Based on the screening of various yucasin analogs, we identified yucasin DF as a specific and potent inhibitor of YUC. Yucasin-type inhibitors could be hydrolyzed in planta and are converted to thiosemicarbazide and corresponding carboxylic acid. Indeed, some aromatic carboxylic acids from analogs showed the inhibition of plant growth, suggesting that the stability of analogs may partly contribute to off-target effects on root growth. Methimazole (Fig. 2) has a similar structure of 1,2,4-triazole-3(4 H)-thione moiety in yucasin, and methimazole is reported to be an inhibitor of flavin-containing monooxygenases involving the YUC family33,34. We modified the 1,2,4-triazole-3(4 H)-thione moiety of yucasin analogs (36, 37 and 38); however, all modifications resulted in the complete loss of inhibitory activity, indicating that the 1,2,4-triazole-3(4 H)-thione moiety is essential for binding to YUC. The structure–activity relationship (SAR) study of the phenyl moiety in yucasin analogs did not provide any rational regularity regarding the binding affinity of the analogs to the YUC enzyme. In our assay using the DR5::GUS reporter in pMDC7::YUC6, the analogs were evaluated as effective inhibitors in planta. Several factors such as the membrane permeability, metabolic stability and binding affinity of the analogs affected the inhibitory activity in the in planta assays. Our SAR results implied that the substitution of the phenyl ring of the analogs affects both the metabolic stability in planta and the binding affinity to YUC.

The naturally occurring auxin IAA is thought to be mainly biosynthesized by the IPA pathway. In addition, IAA is supplied from the intermediates IBA, IAM, TAM and IAN2,5. Phenylacetic acid (PAA) is recognized as an endogenous auxin, but the physiological function and biosynthetic pathway of PAA has not been unveiled35. In the Brassicaceae, IAA is also supplied from an alternative minor IAOx pathway involving CYP79B36. In Arabidopsis plants, 3 TAA genes and 11 YUC genes function in the IPA pathway, and 2 CYP79B genes are involved in the IAOx pathway. Other enzymes responsible for the minor pathway of IAA supplies have not been revealed. These complicated metabolic pathways and redundant gene families for IAA biosynthesis would prevent the access of genetic approaches to studying the IAA biosynthetic pathway of various plant species. We blocked the genetically assigned IAA synthetic pathways (the IPA and IAOx pathways) by the combination of TAA and YUC inhibitors and the cyp79b2 79b3 double mutant. The inhibition of both IPA and IAOx pathways resulted in a more impaired phenotype than that from the inhibition of the IPA pathway alone, but the plants still slightly grew in the absence of both pathways. The auxin antagonist auxinole blocked the auxin response derived from the minor IAA supply and PAA. Co-treatment with YDF, L-Kyn and auxinole completely blocked plant growth after the cotyledons opened. This evidence implies that the minor IAA supply and another natural auxin such as PAA play a role in auxin-regulated plant development.

YDF was identified as a potent inhibitor in planta, but the in vitro enzymatic inhibitory activity of YDF was much lower than that of yucasin. We revealed that YDF is a metabolically stable analog of yucasin and therefore showed potent activity in planta. Photoaffinity labeling experiments confirmed that the yucasin-type inhibitor binds to the active site of the YUC enzyme. The substrate recognition residue of the binding site may be conserved among land plants, implying yucasin-type inhibitors may be effective on diverse kinds of land plants. YDF was demonstrated to be effective on mosses and liverworts in addition to Arabidopsis plants (Fig. 8). These results demonstrated that YDF is a promising chemical tool for auxin biology in diverse land plants.

Materials and Methods

Synthesis of the yucasin analogs and photoaffinity yucasin probe

Yucasin analogs were synthesized in accordance with method A or method B as described below. For method A, aryl carboxylic acid (2 mmol) and thiosemicarbazide (5 mmol) were dissolved in DMF (5 mL), after which 1-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (WSCD HCl, 2.4 mmol) was added. The solution was stirred at room temperature for 4 h. The reaction mixture was then poured into water (50 mL) and then acidified to pH 3–4 with 2 M HCl. The solution was kept at 4 °C for 1 h. The precipitate was then collected by filtration and washed with distilled water. The product was dried in vacuo to afford aryl hydrazinecarbothioamide. For method B, aryl acid chloride (2 mmol) was added dropwise to thiosemicarbazide (4 mmol) in THF (10 mL). The reaction mixture was then stirred at room temperature for 6 h. The resulting suspension was poured into water (50 mL) and then extracted with EtOAc twice. The combined EtOAc layer was thoroughly washed with water and then concentrated in vacuo. The resulting powder was suspended in water and collected by filtration. The powder was then dried in vacuo to afford aryl hydrazinecarbothioamide.

The aryl hydrazinecarbothioamide obtained using method A or B (0.4–1.5 mmol) was suspended in aqueous sodium hydroxide (3 equivalents of NaOH in 10 mL of water) and stirred at 90 °C for 1.5 h. The resulting mixture was added to water (50 mL) and then acidified with 2 M HCl. The precipitate was collected by filtration and washed with distilled water. The product was dried in vacuo to afford the corresponding yucasin analogs.

The synthetic procedure of the photoaffinity yucasin probe is presented in the supplemental methods. The yield, physicochemical and spectroscopic properties of all analogs and probes are also provided in the supplemental methods.

Plant materials and growth conditions

Arabidopsis thaliana (Col-0) was used as the wild type. Seeds were surface-sterilized and grown on solid medium (half-strength MS medium containing 1.2% sucrose and 4 g/L agar for agar medium or 14 g/L agar for vertical agar plates, pH 5.7). Primary root length was measured using ImageJ software. The wild-type strain of P. patens was cultured on BCDAT agar medium under continuous white light at 24 °C. M. polymorpha was cultured on half-strength Gamborg’s B5 media containing 8 g/L agar under continuous white light at 24 °C.

Histochemical and quantitative GUS measurements

For fluorescent quantitative measurements of GUS reporter activity, 5-d-old DR5::GUS pMDC7::YUC6 lines (n = 12−15) were homogenized in an extraction buffer as previously described37. After centrifugation, GUS activity was fluorophotometrically determined with 1 mM 4-methyl umbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide as a fluorogenic substrate at 37 °C. For GUS histochemical analysis, plants were transferred to a GUS staining buffer (100 mM sodium phosphate [pH 7.0], 10 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 0.5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, and 0.1% Triton X-100) containing 1 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronide (X-Gluc). The plants were incubated at 37 °C until sufficient staining developed.

Recombinant YUC1 enzyme assays

Recombinant YUC1 in the pET-53-DEST vector (Novagen, Japan) was expressed in the E. coli BL21 Star (DE3) strain (Invitrogen), and then YUC1 was purified using TALON metal affinity resin (Clontech). The enzyme assay was performed in a 50-µL reaction mixture containing 0.25 µg of YUC1, 20 µM IPA, 40 µM FAD, and 1 mM NADPH in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.5) with or without inhibitors. IPA and inhibitors were added to the mixture immediately before the reaction. An assay without NADPH was used as a blank control to estimate the nonenzymatic conversion of IPA to IAA. Enzyme reactions were stopped by the addition of 50 µL of acetonitrile with 13C6-IAA (150 pmol) (Cambridge Isotope Laboratories) and analyzed using LC-MS/MS on TripleTOF 5600 (AB SCIEX) and Nexera UHPLC (Shimadzu) systems equipped with an HSS T3 column (1.8 µm, 2.1 × 50 mm) (Waters). Elution was carried out using 0.05% (v/v) acetic acid/water (solvent A) and 0.05% (v/v) acetic acid/acetonitrile (solvent B) with a gradient from 0% to 35% of solvent B (0 min to 6 min) at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. The temperature of the column was 40 °C. MS/MS analysis was performed in negative ion mode with the following parameters: declustering potential, −50; collision energy, −15; GS1, 40; GS2, 40; temperature, 500; and parent ion (m/z), 174.1 for IAA and 180.1 for 13C6-IAA. Fragment ions (m/z) of 130.06 and 136.08 were used for the quantification of IAA and 13C6-IAA, respectively.

Measurements of endogenous IAA

LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis of IAA was performed using an Agilent 6420 Triple Quad system (Agilent) as previously described35.

Stability of yucasin analogs in medium and root cell lysate

For chemical stability, yucasin, yucasin MF and yucasin DF (100 μM) were incubated in 1/2 MS liquid medium for 6 days at 24 °C under continuous light. The sample was analyzed using HPLC at regular intervals. The analytical conditions and HPLC chromatogram of yucasin and YDF are indicated in Supplemental Fig. S8. For metabolic stability, Arabidopsis roots (50 mg) were homogenized in 1.5 mL of 100 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). After centrifugation, yucasin and YDF (250 µM) were incubated for 18 h at 24 °C in Arabidopsis root lysate in the dark. Residual inhibitors were measured using HPLC as indicated in Supplemental Fig. S8.

Photoaffinity labeling experiments

Photoaffinity probes (20 μM) and substrate (200 μM) were added to the purified recombinant AtYUC6 enzyme solution (15 μg of YUC6 protein in 100 µL of 10 mM phosphate buffer), which was then kept in the dark for 30 min on ice. A 6-W UV hand lamp (UVG-54, UVP Co., Ltd) was placed over the sample at a 2-cm distance from the tube. The sample on ice was irradiated with 254-nm UV for 10 min. Two microliters of 2-mercaptoethanol (100 mM) was immediately added after irradiation. Cold acidic acetone (1% of 6 M HCl in acetone) was added to the YUC6 solution, after which the solution was kept for 4 h at −30 °C. The sample was then centrifuged (13,000 × g for 15 min), and the precipitated YUC6 protein was washed again with cold acetone to remove unreacted photoaffinity probe. The YUC6 protein was dissolved in 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.2, 50 μL) and then heated at 90 °C for 1–2 min. Fluorescent-tagged triaryl phosphine (50 μM final concentration) was added to react with alkyl azido groups at 40 °C for 5 h. After reacting, the YUC6 protein was again precipitated with cold acidic acetone (1% of 6 M HCl in acetone) and then washed with cold acetone to remove unreacted fluorescent tag molecules. The resultant tagged YUC6 protein was analyzed using SDS-PAGE and visualized using an FM-BIO II fluorescence imaging system (488 nm excitation and 520 nm emission wavelengths, Hitachi, Japan).

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Lavy, M. & Estelle, M. Mechanisms of auxin signaling. Development 143, 3226–3229 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Zhao, Y. Auxin biosynthesis. Arabidopsis Book 12, e0173 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Adamowski, M. & Friml, J. PIN-dependent auxin transport: action, regulation, and evolution. Plant Cell 27, 20–32 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Woodward, A. W. & Bartel, B. Auxin: regulation, action, and interaction. Ann Bot 95, 707–735 (2005).

  5. 5.

    Kasahara, H. Current aspects of auxin biosynthesis in plants. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 80, 34–42 (2015).

  6. 6.

    Ludwig-Muller, J. Auxin conjugates: their role for plant development and in the evolution of land plants. J Exp Bot 62, 1757–1773 (2011).

  7. 7.

    Tao, Y. et al. Rapid synthesis of auxin via a new tryptophan-dependent pathway is required for shade avoidance in plants. Cell 133, 164–176 (2008).

  8. 8.

    Stepanova, A. N. et al. TAA1-mediated auxin biosynthesis is essential for hormone crosstalk and plant development. Cell 133, 177–191 (2008).

  9. 9.

    Decker, E. L., Frank, W., Sarnighausen, E. & Reski, R. Moss systems biology en route: phytohormones in Physcomitrella development. Plant Biol (Stuttg) 8, 397–405 (2006).

  10. 10.

    Eklund, D. M. et al. Auxin Produced by the Indole-3-Pyruvic Acid Pathway Regulates Development and Gemmae Dormancy in the Liverwort Marchantia polymorpha. Plant Cell 27, 1650–1669 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Won, C. et al. Conversion of tryptophan to indole-3-acetic acid by Tryptophan Aminotransferases Of Arabidopsis and YUCCAs in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 18518–18523 (2011).

  12. 12.

    Mashiguchi, K. et al. The main auxin biosynthesis pathway in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 18512–18517 (2011).

  13. 13.

    Stepanova, A. N. et al. The Arabidopsis YUCCA1 flavin monooxygenase functions in the indole-3-pyruvic acid branch of auxin biosynthesis. Plant Cell 23, 3961–3973 (2011).

  14. 14.

    Ma, Q. & Robert, S. Auxin biology revealed by small molecules. Physiol Plant 151, 25–42 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Hicks, G. R. & Raikhel, N. V. Small molecules present large opportunities in plant biology. Annu Rev Plant Biol 63, 261–282 (2012).

  16. 16.

    Kakei, Y. et al. Biochemical and chemical biology study of rice OsTAR1 revealed that tryptophan aminotransferase is involved in auxin biosynthesis; identification of a potent OsTAR1 inhibitor, pyruvamine2031. Plant Cell Physiol (2017).

  17. 17.

    Soeno, K. et al. Auxin biosynthesis inhibitors, identified by a genomics-based approach, provide insights into auxin biosynthesis. Plant Cell Physiol 51, 524–536 (2010).

  18. 18.

    Narukawa-Nara, M. et al. Aminooxy-naphthylpropionic acid and its derivatives are inhibitors of auxin biosynthesis targeting l-tryptophan aminotransferase: structure-activity relationships. Plant J 87, 245–257 (2016).

  19. 19.

    He, W. et al. A small-molecule screen identifies L-kynurenine as a competitive inhibitor of TAA1/TAR activity in ethylene-directed auxin biosynthesis and root growth in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23, 3944–3960 (2011).

  20. 20.

    Kakei, Y. et al. Small-molecule auxin inhibitors that target YUCCA are powerful tools for studying auxin function. Plant J 84, 827–837 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Nishimura, T. et al. Yucasin is a potent inhibitor of YUCCA, a key enzyme in auxin biosynthesis. Plant J 77, 352–366 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Curtis, M. D. & Grossniklaus, U. A gateway cloning vector set for high-throughput functional analysis of genes in planta. Plant Physiol 133, 462–469 (2003).

  23. 23.

    Ulmasov, T., Murfett, J., Hagen, G. & Guilfoyle, T. J. Aux/IAA proteins repress expression of reporter genes containing natural and highly active synthetic auxin response elements. Plant Cell 9, 1963–1971 (1997).

  24. 24.

    Brunoud, G. et al. A novel sensor to map auxin response and distribution at high spatio-temporal resolution. Nature 482, 103–106 (2012).

  25. 25.

    Hayashi, K. et al. Rational design of an auxin antagonist of the SCF(TIR1) auxin receptor complex. ACS Chem Biol 7, 590–598 (2012).

  26. 26.

    Chen, Q. et al. Auxin overproduction in shoots cannot rescue auxin deficiencies in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell Physiol 55, 1072–1079 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Rensing, S. A. et al. The Physcomitrella genome reveals evolutionary insights into the conquest of land by plants. Science 319, 64–69 (2008).

  28. 28.

    Jang, G. & Dolan, L. Auxin promotes the transition from chloronema to caulonema in moss protonema by positively regulating PpRSL1and PpRSL2 in Physcomitrella patens. New Phytol 192, 319–327 (2011).

  29. 29.

    Saxon, E. & Bertozzi, C. R. Cell surface engineering by a modified Staudinger reaction. Science 287, 2007–2010 (2000).

  30. 30.

    Hosoya, T. et al. Novel bifunctional probe for radioisotope-free photoaffinity labeling: compact structure comprised of photospecific ligand ligation and detectable tag anchoring units. Org Biomol Chem 2, 637–641 (2004).

  31. 31.

    Sun, P., Wang, G. X., Furuta, K. & Suzuki, M. Synthesis of a bis-azido analogue of acromelic acid for radioisotope-free photoaffinity labeling and biochemical studies. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 16, 2433–2436 (2006).

  32. 32.

    Wang, D. et al. Carboxyl BODIPY dyes from bicarboxylic anhydrides: one-pot preparation, spectral properties, photostability, and biolabeling. J Org Chem 74, 7675–7683 (2009).

  33. 33.

    Nace, C. G., Genter, M. B., Sayre, L. M. & Crofton, K. M. Effect of methimazole, an FMO substrate and competitive inhibitor, on the neurotoxicity of 3,3′-iminodipropionitrile in male rats. Fundam Appl Toxicol 37, 131–140 (1997).

  34. 34.

    Eswaramoorthy, S., Bonanno, J. B., Burley, S. K. & Swaminathan, S. Mechanism of action of a flavin-containing monooxygenase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 9832–9837 (2006).

  35. 35.

    Sugawara, S. et al. Distinct Characteristics of Indole-3-Acetic Acid and Phenylacetic Acid, Two Common Auxins in Plants. Plant Cell Physiol 56, 1641–1654 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Sugawara, S. et al. Biochemical analyses of indole-3-acetaldoxime-dependent auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 5430–5435 (2009).

  37. 37.

    Yamazoe, A., Hayashi, K., Kepinski, S., Leyser, O. & Nozaki, H. Characterization of terfestatin A, a new specific inhibitor for auxin signaling. Plant Physiol 139, 779–789 (2005).

Download references


This work was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research C awarded to K.H. (15K01828) and the Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) awarded to K.M. (15H05623).

Author information


  1. Department of Biochemistry, Okayama University of Science, Kitaku, Okayama city, Okayama, 700-0005, Japan

    • Shinichi Tsugafune
    • , Kosuke Fukui
    •  & Ken-ichiro Hayashi
  2. Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai city, Miyagi, 980-8577, Japan

    • Kiyoshi Mashiguchi
  3. RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science, Yokohama city, Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan

    • Yumiko Takebayashi
    •  & Hiroyuki Kasahara
  4. Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya University, Nagoya city, Aichi, 464-8601, Japan

    • Takeshi Nishimura
  5. Graduate School of Science and Technology, Niigata University, Nishiku, Niigata, 950-2181, Japan

    • Tatsuya Sakai
  6. Kihara Institute for Biological Research, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, 244-0813, Japan

    • Yukihisa Shimada
  7. Institute of Global Innovation Research, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Fuchu city, Tokyo, 183-8509, Japan

    • Hiroyuki Kasahara
  8. Department of Biological Sciences, Tokyo Metropolitan University, Hachioji city, Tokyo, 192-0397, Japan

    • Tomokazu Koshiba


  1. Search for Shinichi Tsugafune in:

  2. Search for Kiyoshi Mashiguchi in:

  3. Search for Kosuke Fukui in:

  4. Search for Yumiko Takebayashi in:

  5. Search for Takeshi Nishimura in:

  6. Search for Tatsuya Sakai in:

  7. Search for Yukihisa Shimada in:

  8. Search for Hiroyuki Kasahara in:

  9. Search for Tomokazu Koshiba in:

  10. Search for Ken-ichiro Hayashi in:


S.T., T.N., T.K. and K.H. designed the experiments. S.T., K.M., K.F., H.K., Y.T., and K.H. performed the experiments. T.S., S.T. and K.H. generated the transgenic plants. S.T., K.F., and K.H. synthesized and characterized the compounds. Y.S. analyzed the data. S.T., K.M., H.K. and K.H. wrote and corrected the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ken-ichiro Hayashi.

Electronic supplementary material


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit