Article | Open | Published:

Prognostic Value of Lordosis Decrease in Radiographic Adjacent Segment Pathology After Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion


While cervical lordosis alteration is not uncommon after anterior cervical arthrodesis, its influence on radiological adjacent segment pathology (RASP) is still unclear. Biomechanical changes induced by arthrodesis may contribute to ASP onset. To investigate the correlation between cervical lordosis decrease and RASP onset after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) and to determine its biomechanical effect on adjacent segments after surgery, 80 CSM patients treated with ACCF were retrospectively studied, and a baseline finite element model of the cervical spine as well as post-operation models with normal and decreased lordosis were established and validated. We found that post-operative lordosis decrease was prognostic in predicting RASP onset, with the hazard ratio of 0.45. In the FE models, ROM at the adjacent segment increased after surgery, and the increase was greater in the model with decreased lordosis. Thus, post-operative cervical lordosis change significantly correlated with RASP occurrence, and it may be of prognostic value. The biomechanical changes induced by lordosis change at the adjacent segments after corpectomy may be one of the mechanisms for this phenomenon. Restoring a well lordotic cervical spine after corpectomy may reduce RASP occurrence and be beneficial to long-term surgical outcomes.


Early surgery may effectively change the unfavorable prognosis of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM)1,2,3,4. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) is a commonly performed surgery in treating CSM, especially multilevel CSM, which may allow a better decompression of the neural element and less graft-bone surfaces for fusion comparing to 2-level discectomy5,6. Donor comorbidity by harvesting autologous bone graft, such as local pain or fracture, can also be avoided as well7.

As the prevalence of CSM increases and the age of patients treated by surgery decreases, special attention is being paid to the long-term surgical outcome. Adjacent segment pathology (ASP) is an important issue as it occurs in one out of every 3–4 patients within 10 years after anterior arthrodesis, and is also one of the most common reasons for revision surgery8. However, ASP in CSM patients treated by corpectomy is less studied, and its pathogenetic mechanism remains uncertain. In addition to the effects of aging, heredity and many other factors, the role of biomechanical factors in disc degeneration is widely recognized. Abnormal loading such as vibration, torsion and compression may affect synthetic activity and extracellular matrix molecular expression in the disc9. Biomechanical loading shifts, such as an increase of segmental range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure, and stiffness to adjacent segments after arthrodesis were also consistently observed in many experimental and clinical studies10,11,12,13, and may play an important role in ASP onset.

Cervical lordosis is a unique morphological characteristic of the cervical spine and may help to optimize the biomechanical loading in this region. As one of the factors to consider in surgical planning4, surgeons may choose an anterior over a posterior approach in cases of alignment deformity to achieve a better decompression outcome. Post-surgical malalignment might be associated with ASP occurrence14,15,16,17,18, though irrelevance was also noted19,20. As the range of normal cervical lordosis is large and the ratio of kyphosis is low, the influence of lordosis change may be underestimated if not directly compared to the patient’s pre-surgical condition. This underestimation may contribute to the controversy in previous studies. In addition, as proposed by Benzel et al.21, once the cervical lordosis decreases, moments imposed on the whole cervical spine, the instaneous axis of rotation (IAR) and lever arm length (starting from the IAR), may be altered, and the biomechanical shifting at adjacent segments may be subsequently affected.

To elucidate the role of cervical lordosis change after ACCF in ASP onset, we examined the relationship between cervical lordosis change and RASP onset in a group of CSM patients treated by ACCF. We hypothesized that post-surgical cervical lordosis decrease might affect the biomechanical loading shift at the adjacent segment, which in turn might contribute to ASP onset. Therefore, we developed a finite element model to simulate post-surgical cervical spine with normal and decreased lordosis to test our hypothesis. The surgical maneuver and lordosis (C2-7 Cobb angle) change simulated in the post-surgery finite element models were determined according to the patients we studied.


Clinical Outcomes

In the 80 patients included, RASP was present in 37 patients. The demographics and clinical information for both the RASP and non-RASP groups are listed in Table 1. No statistical difference was found between the two groups, excepting a longer follow-up time in the RASP group (36.8 ± 20.7 vs 23.7 ± 12.9 months). Pre-operative, post-operative, and follow-up JOA scores are also listed in Table 1. Post-operative and follow-up JOA scores were significantly improved in both groups. The follow-up JOA score was significantly lower than the post-operative JOA score in the RASP group, but higher in the non-RASP group.

Table 1 Demographic and Clinical Information of Patients in RASP and Non-RASP groups.

Table 2 shows the global alignment of both groups before and after operation. Figure 1 shows the average C2-7 Cobb angle in both groups before and after surgery. The post-operative C2-7 and fused segment Cobb angle change were both significantly correlated with RASP onset. After adjustment of confounding factors of age, gender, operation location, fused segment, pre-operative alignment, and operating surgeons, a Cox regression analysis was further performed to evaluate the prognostic value of post-surgical lordotic angle change and the results showed that only the post- surgery C2-7 Cobb angle change was significantly associated with RASP onset, with the hazard ratio of 0.454 (Table 3).

Table 2 Cervical alignment change before and after operation.
Figure 1

Pre-operative, post-operative, and final follow up cervical Cobb angle change. *p < 0.05 comparing to pre-operation using paired t test. **P < 0.05 comparing to pre-operation and post-operation using paired t test.

Table 3 Cox regression analysis for the predictive value of post-operation lordosis angle change in RASP occurrence.

Post-surgical FE model validation

ROM of the operated segments (C4-6) in both post-surgical models were validated and matched well with Hartmann (2015) in all motions. It also matched well with results obtained from Zhang (2006) in flexion, extension, and axial rotation, but C4-6 ROM in post-H was 7.6% larger in extension, In addition, it was 48% and 70% larger in post-N and post-H during lateral bending (Fig. 2).

Figure 2

Validation of post-operation models with normal and decreased lordosis after C5 subtotal corpectomy and fusion.

Adjacent segment response in post-surgical models with different lordotic angles

Under moment-control loading, the percentage of adjacent segment ROM was increased consistently in post-surgery models; in particular, the superior adjacent segment (SAS) was more obvious than the inferior adjacent segment (IAS), as shown in Fig. 3. The ROM percentage increase was consistently greater in post-H model in extension, lateral bending and axial rotation, especially at the SAS. However, the ROM percentage change was not obvious in flexion in both post-surgery models.

Figure 3

The segmental ROM percentage at superior (left row), inferior (middle row) and both (right row) adjacent segment in the intact model, post-operation models with normal lordosis (post-N) and decreased lordosis (post-H) in flexion (AC), extension (DF), lateral bending (GI) and axial rotation (JL) under moment-control loading.

Under displacement-control loading, adjacent segmental ROM increase was greater in post-H model during flexion, especially the IAS (Fig. 4). The increase percentage at the SAS, the IAS, and both was −4%, 138.36% and 28.3% in post-N, and 6.1%, 165.08% and 42.07% in post-H. The intradiscal pressure was obviously larger in the adjacent segments of post-H, and the maximum pressure at the SAS of post-N and post-H was 10.45 MPa and 11.32 MPa, while the IAS was 14.05 MPa and 18.25 MPa, respectively(Fig. 5 A–D). During extension, the SAS ROM increase was greater, and the IAS ROM increase was smaller in post-H (Fig. 4). The increase percentage at the SAS, the IAS, and both AS was 35.78%, 63.78%, 46.02% in post-N, and 77.22%, 28.23%, 59.30% in post-H. Similarly, the intradiscal pressure was greater at the SAS but smaller at the IAS in post-H, with the maximum pressure at the SAS of post-N and post-H at 3.63 MPa and 6.68 MPa. The maximum pressure at the IAS was 8.21 MPa and 5.16 MPa, respectively  (Fig. 5 E–H).

Figure 4

The superior and inferior segment ROM in intact and post-operation models with different lordosis in flexion and extension under displacement-control loading. (SAS: superior adjacent segment; IAS: inferior adjacent segment; F: flexion; E: extension.)

Figure 5

Comparison of intradiscal pressure distribution of superior (A, B and E, F)and inferior (C, D, and G, H) adjacent segment in flexion (A–D) and extension  (E–H) under displacement-control loading. (A,C,E,G: post-N model; B,D,F,H post-H model).


According to the clinical manifestation ASP can be classified into RASP and CASP. Primarily diagnosed with imaging examination, RASP is relatively objective and may be graded. However, though CASP tend to be more often in patients with RASP7,12,14, the correlation between RASP and CASP remains elusive. Similar with previous studies, the prevalence of RASP was 46.25% in the patients we studied, and the follow-up JOA scores were significantly lower in RASP group, though the immediate post-surgery RR was not significantly different between the 2 groups. The correlation between RASP and CASP was not confirmed in this study, which may be influenced by the relatively short follow-up time and scarcity of CASP.

Previous clinical studies indicated that post-operative cervical lordosis may be relevant to the therapeutic outcome of cervical arthrodesis14,22,23, but its influence to ASP occurrence was still uncertain. Kastuura et al.14 and Faldini et al.17 found that ASP in lordotic patients was significantly lower than non-lordotic patients after arthrodesis. In both studies, the C2-7 Cobb angle significantly correlated with ASP occurrence. However, in the studies of Kulkarni et al.16 and Park et al.18, the post-surgical C2-7 Cobb angle was not significantly correlated with ASP, though both studies found that ASP was significantly higher in non-lordotic patients after surgery. Others have also shown that there was no correlation between them19,20. Most of these studies, however, only examined the patients’ post-surgical lordosis conditions and largely ignored their pre-operative status. In this study, we found that post-operative C2-7 Cobb angles significantly decreased in the RASP group, but significantly increased in the non-RASP group, both in the immediate post-operative period and the final follow-up. As suggested by Cox regression analysis in this study, C2-7 Cobb angle change was significantly associated with RASP onset, even with a mild degree. Thus, maintaining a well lordotic cervical alignment after ACCF may be beneficial in reducing post-surgical RASP onset.

The mechanism for such influence is unclear. The role of biomechanical factors in disc degeneration has been recognized, as consistent and repetitive loading mimicking rigorous daily activities may induce disc damages9. Similarly, segmental ROM and intradiscal pressure were increased at adjacent segments after ACF, demonstrated by both in vitro 10,11 and in vivo studies12,13. Thus, post-surgical biomechanical loading shift was considered an important factor in ASP pathogenesis. According to Benzel et al.21, it was speculated that once the lordosis changes, the instaneous axis of rotation (IAR) location, lever arm length and subsequent moment imposed on the cervical spinal structures may be altered. The loading was increased at the anterior column of the cervical spine, while the posterior annulus and Sharpey’s fibers might be extended to detach from the endplate, with an increase of uncovertebral and facet joints loading. However, it is difficult to precisely obtain the biomechanical parameter change in either animal or cadaver study by accurately change the cervical alignment. In this study, we innovatively calculated the qualitative change in adjacent segment after ACCF, using finite element models in which only the lordotic angle differed. The results showed that intradiscal stress and ROM at adjacent segment demonstrated greater change in less lordotic post-surgical model, which supported Benzel’s hypothesis and may provide a clue for the mechanism of ASP occurrence after ACCF. The lordosis decrease, even if a mild degree, may cause biomechanical loading alteration at adjacent segment which may subsequently contribute to RASP onset.

Numerical modeling has been used in studies of cervical spine surgery24 and cervical lordosis abnormality25 as an invaluable tool and complement to the experimental study of biomechanics. Extensive validation is necessary for FE modeling studies to add confidence in the accuracy of results. For this reason, in addition to intact model validation, we also validated the post-surgical models with previous cadaveric studies. Except for a higher ROM in lateral bending than found in the results of Zhang et al.26, both validations for the intact model and post-surgical models were in agreement with previous studies. As the intra- and inter-deviations in in vitro studies were large, and the result reported by Zhang et al. was lower than other in vitro studies27,28, we believe that the models developed in this study were biofidelic, and may provide new clues for future studies.

It is still controversial as to whether moment-control or displacement-control is closer to physiological conditions, and so we adopted both loading schemes in this study. Both post-operative models showed an increase of segmental ROM and intradiscal pressure at adjacent segments, but the increase was more obvious in the post-H model under both moment and displacement-control loading conditions. These results were in agreement with previous in vitro studies of Hwang et al.29 and Wang et al.30. They both found that cervical lordosis change might have induced the biomechanical loading or motion difference. In the study of Hwang et al.29, the segmental lordosis was changed by spacers with different sizes, and the ROM of the adjacent segment was significantly increased in the slight lordosis increase group (small spacer); but it was not significantly different in the group with larger spacers. However, the difference was not significant once the pre-surgical lordosis was adjusted. It may be because the fused segment Cobb angle was not significantly relevant, as shown in this study, but this still awaits validation in future studies as sampling bias could not be excluded.

There are some limitations to this study. Firstly, the relatively small sample size and the nature of retrospective study may add bias to the clinical information collected and thus limit the generalizablity of this study. Further study was still warranted. Secondly, although kyphotic change was generally considered abnormal and possibly necessitating intervention, the incidence in this cohort and previous studies was low. Therefore, we only studied the influence in case of cervical lordosis decrease (straightening) in FE analysis while other alignment deformities were not included. In addition, other measurements of cervical alignment such as sagittal vertical axis (SVA) and chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA), which may be important to surgical outcome31, were not examined in this study as they were difficult to obtain retrospectively and might reflect long-term adaptation of the whole spine. Furthermore, the FE models of this study only predicted the biomechanical responses of osseous and articulation structures, while active muscle response and neuro-muscular coupling of humans could not be accurately presented in current FE modeling and cadaver experiments. Similarly, as the surgery we simulated was C5 subtotal corpectomy and fusion, the results should not be extrapolated to reflect the biomechanical change at the adjacent segment in other surgical approaches, as it may vary with surgery location and fused segment number.

In summary, our study demonstrated that post-operative cervical lordosis decrease significantly correlates with RASP occurrence in CSM patients treated by ACCF and may be of prognostic value. The difference in ROM and IDP increase at adjacent segments after ACCF observed in post-surgery models with normal and decreased alignment may be one of the underlying mechanisms for the phenomenon. Therefore, restoring a well lordotic cervical spine after ACF may improve long-term surgical outcome and reduce the incidence of RASP.

Materials and Method


144 CSM patients treated by ACCF and received imaging examinations in our department between January 2008 and December 2013 were retrospectively studied. Inclusion criteria were: a diagnosis of CSM which was treated by ACCF, a minimum follow-up of 1 year, and the availability of complete clinical and imaging information. To reduce other confounding factors, patients were excluded if there were prior cervical surgeries or if a discectomy or if a posterior approach in cervical surgery; and were concurrent non-degenerative conditions, such as cervical spine fracture, active inflammation or infection, connective tissue disease, neoplasm, and congenital abnormalities. Finally, 80 CSM patients treated by ACCF were included. All of the patients had titanium mesh cage with autologous bone graft and anterior cervical plating fixation.

Of those patients, 62 patients were excluded due to loss of follow-up or incomplete imaging data, and 2 patients died within 2 years after surgery due to unrelated conditions. Therefore, a total of 80 patients (37 male, 43 female) were included for analysis in this retrospective study, and all of them received the surgery in the Department of Orthopeadics and Spine Surgery, the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University. The surgery was performed by the same group of surgeons. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Third Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, and all methods were in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. Written and/or oral informed consent was obtained from each of the patients.

The average patient age at surgery was 50.5 ± 8.9 years (range: 29–75 years old), and the average follow-up period was 29.8 ± 18.1 months (range: 12–88 months). 67 patients had a 1-level and 13 patients had a 2-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.

Imaging evaluation

All patients had a radiological examination of the cervical spine pre-operatively, post-operatively (2–4 weeks after surgery), and at final follow-up (at least 1 year after surgery). Imaging included frontal and neutral lateral radiographs of the cervical spine. Pre-operative and follow-up MRI and/or CT images of the cervical spine were also obtained. RASP was diagnosed when new or progressed degeneration was found at an adjacent segment, including disc space narrowing, osteophyte enlargement, endplate sclerosis, uncoarthrosis and facet joint degeneration by radiography and/or disc protrusion on CT/MRI. The C2-7 Cobb angle and fused segment Cobb angle were measured on pre-operative, post-operative, and follow-up lateral radiographs of the cervical spine. The global sagittal alignment of the cervical spine was further classified as lordotic, straightened, kyphotic, or sigmoid, according to the Toyama classification32. All the images were evaluated by two experienced radiologist (Ye B. and Liu Y.) who were blind to patients’ clinical outcome, twice within a month, and the average were used for analysis. RASP diagnosis for each patient was agreed by both radiologists.

Clinical evaluation

Demographic data, clinical diagnosis and surgery information were obtained from electronic medical records, including the patient’s age at operation, gender, surgery information, and follow-up period. Surgical outcome was evaluated using recovery rate (RR), which was calculated from Japanese Orthopedica Association (JOA) scores before and after surgery (within 1 month after surgery and at final follow-up) using the formula proposed by Hirabayashi et al.33. Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification were measured for patients with ossification of the cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. [RR(%) = (postoperative JOA score-preoperative JOA score)/(17-preoperative JOA score) × 100].

Finite element model development and loading condition

An anatomical detailed finite element model of human C0-7 cervical spine was developed previously34. As most in vitro and numerical studies on ASP used the subaxial cervical spine and there was no upper cervical fusion in the patients studied above, we only used a C2-7 model (intact model) in the surgery simulation. The post-operative models with normal lordosis (post-N) and decreased lordosis (post-H) were developed on the basis of the intact model (Fig. 6). The surgical intervention simulated in this study was a C5 subtotal corpectomy with the reconstruction of a graft implant and anterior cervical plating, which was also the most common surgery performed in the clinical sample. To be as close to a clinical scenario as possible, the postsurgical models were developed by removing the central part of the C5 vertebral body, the nucleus and surrounding annulus fibrosis of the C4-5 and C5-6 disc, as well as the ALL and PLL of the C4-5 and C5-6. The lateral peripheral annulus of discs, bilateral facet joints, uncovertebral joints and posterior spinal element remained intact. The osseous graft was placed anteriorly to the center of the resected C5, in-between the undersurface of C4 and the upper surface of C6, with rigid fusion of the endplates. A titanium plate (40 × 13 × 2 mm) was placed in front of the C4-6 vertebral body with a rigid screw in C4 and C6. According to neutral lateral cervical radiography of the typical patients in the RASP group, a post-surgical model with decreased lordosis was developed by slightly changing the vertebral positions in the post-N model  (Fig. 6). The C2-7 Cobb angle for post-N and post-H models were 22° and 13° respectively, which was close to the average value for pre-operative and post-operative Cobb angle in RASP group. The material properties of the models and instrumentation are listed in Table 4.

Figure 6

The finite element models of C2-7 cervical spine after C5 subtotal corpectomy reconstruction with bone graft and anterior plate fixation. The post-operation models showed normal lordosis (Post-N model) (A) and decreased lordosis (Post-H model) (B).

Table 4 Material Properties of Cervical Spine Finite Element Modeling.

To validate the post-surgery models, the fused segmental ROM (C4-6) after C5 corpectomy of both post-surgery models were compared with cadaveric experiment results of Hartmann et al.35 and Zhang et al.26.

After validation of intact and post-surgery models, we tested both moment-control and displacement-control loading to evaluate the adjacent segment responses. For simulation of all motions, C7 was constrained in six degrees of freedom in the Cartesian coordinate system. A compressive preload of 70 N was given36. Bending moments of 0.125 Nm, 0.5 Nm, 1 Nm, 1.5 Nm and 2 Nm were placed on C2 to calculate the adjacent segment (C3-4 and C6-7) ROM and global (C2-7) ROM in flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. In moment loading, the segmental ROM percentage in the global ROM was compared among post-surgery models with normal and decreased lordosis and the intact model. In displacement loading, a flexion of 30° and extension of 15°11 was set to compare the segmental ROM change before and after ACF, as well as the distribution and maximum value of intradiscal pressure at adjacent discs. The LS-DYNA version 971 solver (LSTC, Livermore, CA) was utilized for post-processing.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS18.0. To compare the clinical and imaging characteristics between two groups, we compared continuous variables using a paired t test and Mann-Whitney U test when appropriate. Categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test, and Pearson’s correlation was used for single factor correlation evaluation. To evaluate the prognostic value of post-surgical lordosis change in predicting RASP occurrence, the Cox regression model was further used after adjustment of age, gender, operation location, fused segment number, pre-operative alignment and operating surgeon. Values of P < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Eleraky, M. A., Llanos, C. & Sonntag, V. K. Cervical corpectomy: report of 185 cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg. 90, 35–41 (1999).

  2. 2.

    Klineberg, E., McLain, R. F. & Bell, G. R. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: anterior approach: multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy. Seminars in Spine Surgery. 19, 27–34 (2007).

  3. 3.

    Emery, S. E., Bohlman, H. H., Bolesta, M. J. & Jones, P. K. Anterior cervical decompression and arthrodesis for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Two to seventeen-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 80, 941–951 (1998).

  4. 4.

    Goffin, J. et al. Long-term follow-up after interbody fusion of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 17, 79–85 (2004).

  5. 5.

    Wada, E. et al. Subtotal corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a long-term follow-up study over 10 years. Spine 26, 1443–1447 (2001).

  6. 6.

    Wang, J. C., McDonough, P. W., Endow, K. K. & Delamarter, R. B. A comparison of fusion rates between single-level cervical corpectomy and two-level discectomy and fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech. 14, 222–225 (2001).

  7. 7.

    Kurz, L. T., Garfin, S. R. & Both, R. E. Harvesting autogenous iliac bone grafts. A review of complications and techniques. Spine. 14, 1324–1331 (1989).

  8. 8.

    Hilibrand, A. S. & Robbins, M. Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease: the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J. 4, S190–S194 (2004).

  9. 9.

    Stokes, I. A. & Iatridis, J. C. Mechanical conditions that accelerate intervertebral disc degeneration: overload versus immobilization. Spine. 29, 2724–32 (2004).

  10. 10.

    Eck, J. C. et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine. 27, 2431–2434 (2002).

  11. 11.

    Prasarn, M. L., Baria, D., Milne, E., Latta, L. & Sukovich, W. Adjacent-level biomechanics after single versus multilevel cervical spine fusion: Laboratory investigation. J Neurosurg Spine. 16, 172–177 (2012).

  12. 12.

    Baba, H. et al. Late radiographic findings after anterior cervical fusion for spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Spine. 18, 2167–2173 (1993).

  13. 13.

    Wigfield, C. et al. Influence of an artificial cervical joint compared with fusion on adjacent-level motion in the treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg Spine. 96, 17–21 (2002).

  14. 14.

    Katsuura, A., Hukuda, S., Saruhashi, Y. & Mori, K. Kyphotic malalignment after anterior cervical fusion is one of the factors promoting the degenerative process in adjacent intervertebral levels. Euro Spine J. 10, 320–324 (2001).

  15. 15.

    Wu, W. J., Jiang, L.Y., Liang, Y. & Dai, L.Y. Cage subsidence does not, but cervical lordosis improvement does affect the long-term results of anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone cage for degenerative cervical disc disease: a retrospective study. Euro Spine J. 17, 1374–82 (2012).

  16. 16.

    Vavruch, L., Hedlund, R., Javid, D., Leszniewski, W. & Shalabi, A. A prospective randomized comparison between the Cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine. Spine. 27, 1694–1701 (2002).

  17. 17.

    Faldini, C., Pagkrati, S., Leonetti, D., Miscione, M. T. & Giannini, S. Sagittal segmental alignment as predictor of adjacent-level degeneration after a cloward procedure. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 469, 674–81 (2011).

  18. 18.

    Park, M. S. et al. Sagittal alignment as a predictor of clinical adjacent segment pathology requiring surgery after anterior cervical arthrodesis. Spine J. 14, 1228–1234 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Ishihara, H., Kanamori, M., Kawaguchi, Y., Nakamura, H. & Kimura, T. Adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical interbody fusion. Spine J. 4, 624–628 (2004).

  20. 20.

    Kulkarni, V., Rajshekhar, V. & Raghuram, L. Accelerated spondylotic changes adjacent to the fused segment following central cervical corpectomy: magnetic resonance imaging study evidence. J Neurosurg Spine. 100, 2–6 (2004).

  21. 21.

    Benzel, E.C. Biomechanics of spine stabilization, chapters 1-2, American Association of Neurological Surgeons, 2001.

  22. 22.

    Naderi, S., Özgen, S., Pamir, M. N., Özek, M. M. & Erzen, C. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: surgical results and factors affecting prognosis. Neurosurg. 43, 49–50 (1998).

  23. 23.

    Batzdorf, U. & Flannigan, B. D. Surgical decompressive procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy a study using magnetic resonance imaging. Spine. 16, 123–127 (1991).

  24. 24.

    Maiman, D. J., Kumaresan, S., Yoganandan, N. & Pintar, F. A. Biomechanical effect of anterior cervical spine fusion on adjacent segments. Biomed Mater Eng. 9, 27–38 (1998).

  25. 25.

    Harrison, D. E. et al. Comparison of axial and flexural stresses in lordosis and three buckled configurations of the cervical spine. Clin Biomech. 16, 276–284 (2001).

  26. 26.

    Zhang, J. et al. Biomechanical study of anterior cervical corpectomy and step-cut grafting with bioabsorbable screws fixation in cadaveric cervical spine model. Spine. 31, 2195–2201 (2006).

  27. 27.

    Dogan, S., Baek, S., Sonntag, V. K. & Crawford, N. R. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy. Neurosurg. 63, 303–308 (2008).

  28. 28.

    Karam, Y. R. et al. Biomechanical comparison of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation after one-level anterior cervical corpectomy in the human cadaveric spine. Spine. 36, E455–E460 (2011).

  29. 29.

    Hwang, S. H., Kayanja, M., Milks, R. A. & Benzel, E. C. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis. Spine J. 7, 216–721 (2007).

  30. 30.

    Wang, M., Gourab, K., McGrady, L. M. & Rao, R. D. Alteration of load sharing of anterior cervical implants with change in cervical sagittal alignment. Med Eng Phys. 30, 768–773 (2008).

  31. 31.

    Scheer, J. K. et al. Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 19, 141–159 (2013).

  32. 32.

    Chiba, K. et al. Impact of longitudinal distance of the cervical spine on the results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine. 25, 2893–2898 (2000).

  33. 33.

    Hirabayashi, K., Miyakawa, J., Satomi, K., Maruyama, T. & Wakano, K. Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. 6, 354–364 (1981).

  34. 34.

    Liu, Y. et al. Cervical ligament injury in Sanda: a preliminary biomechanical analysis of finite element head-neck model simulation. J Med Biomech.

  35. 35.

    Hartmann, S. et al. Biomechanical testing of circumferential instrumentation after cervical multilevel corpectomy. Euro Spine J. 24, 2788–2798 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Natarajan, R., Chen, B., An, H. & Andersson, G. Anterior cervical fusion: a finite element model study on motion segment stability including the effect of osteoporosis. Spine. 25, 955–961 (2000).

  37. 37.

    Currey, J. D. Tensile yield in compact bone is determined by strain, post-yield behaviour by mineral content. J Biomech. 37, 549–556 (2004).

  38. 38.

    Kopperdahl, D. L. & Keaveny, T. M. Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. J Biomech. 31, 601–608 (1998).

  39. 39.

    Denozière, G. & Ku, D. N. Biomechanical comparison between fusion of two vertebrae and implantation of an artificial intervertebral disc. J Biomech. 39, 766–775 (2006).

  40. 40.

    Wagner, D. R. & Lotz, J. C. Theoretical model and experimental results for the nonlinear elastic behavior of human annulus fibrosus. Journal of orthopaedic research. 22, 901–909 (2004).

  41. 41.

    Holzapfel, G. A., Schulze-Bauer, C., Feigl, G. & Regitnig, P. Single lamellar mechanics of the human lumbar anulus fibrosus. Biomech Model Mechanobio. 3, 125–140 (2005).

  42. 42.

    Yang, K. H. & Kish, V. L. Compressibility measurement of human intervertebral nucleus pulposus. J Biomech. 21, 865 (1988).

  43. 43.

    Iatridis, J. C., Setton, L. A., Weidenbaum, M. & Mow, V. C. The viscoelastic behavior of the non-degenerate human lumbar nucleus pulposus in shear. J Biomech. 30, 1005–1013 (1997).

  44. 44.

    DiSilvestro, M. R. & Suh, J. K. F. A cross-validation of the biphasic poroviscoelastic model of articular cartilage in unconfined compression, indentation, and confined compression. J Biomech. 34, 519–525 (2001).

  45. 45.

    Yamada, H. & Evans, F. G. Strength of biological materials, chapter 3. (Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1970).

  46. 46.

    Chazal, J. et al. Biomechanical properties of spinal ligaments and a histological study of the supraspinal ligament in traction. J Biomech. 18, 167–76 (1985).

  47. 47.

    Yoganandan, N., Kumaresan, S. & Pintar, F. A. Biomechanics of the cervical spine. Part 2. Cervical spine soft tissue responses and biomechanical modeling. Clinical biomechanics. 16, 1–27 (2001).

  48. 48.

    Ratner, B. D., Hoffman, A. S., Schoen, F. J. & Lemons J. E. Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine. (Academic press, 1996).

Download references


This work was supported by the New Xiangya Talent Project of the Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (JY201712).

Author information

Y. Liu, N. Li, B. Ye and W. Wang participated in the design of this study, Y. Liu, B. Ye and Y. Hu performed clinical data collection and analysis, Y. Liu, N. Li and W. Wei, performed finite models development, experiment design, and data analysis, Y. Liu and J. Deng performed statistical analysis, Y. Liu, N. Li and W. Wang, drafted the manuscript; Wang W. revised the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Correspondence to Wei Wang.

Rights and permissions

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.