Telmisartan Activates PPARδ to Improve Symptoms of Unpredictable Chronic Mild Stress-Induced Depression in Mice


Major depression is a common mental disorder that has been established to be associated with a decrease in serotonin and/or serotonin transporters in the brain. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor δ (PPARδ) has been introduced as a potential target for depression treatment. Telmisartan was recently shown to activate PPARδ expression; therefore, the effectiveness of telmisartan in treating depression was investigated. In unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS) model, treatment with telmisartan for five weeks notably decrease in the time spent in the central and the reduced frequency of grooming and rearing in open filed test (OFT) and the decreased sucrose consumption in sucrose preference test (SPT) compared with the paradigms. Telmisartan also reversed the decrease in PPARδ and 5-HTT levels in the hippocampus of depression-like mice. Administration of PPARδ antagonist GSK0660 and direct infusion of sh-PPARδ into the brain blocked the effects of telmisartan on the improvement of depression-like behavior in these mice. Moreover, telmisartan enhanced the expression of PPARδ and 5HTT in H19-7 cells. In conclusion, the obtained results suggest that telmisartan improves symptoms of stress-induced depression in animals under chronic stress through activation of PPARδ. Therefore, telmisartan may be developed as a potential anti-depressant in the future.


The chronic and stressful life events are associated with the onset of major depression, which is the most prevalent psychiatric disorder with high morbidity and mortality rates1. Efforts to reduce the prevalence of depression continue due to its public health significance. Therefore, the model of unpredictable chronic mild stress (UCMS) was developed to investigate depressive phenomena and drug treatment in animals. Clinical and experimental data have shown that the disturbances in the serotoninergic system and stress play a key role in depressive disorders2. Serotonin (5-HT) released from serotonergic terminals is selectively taken up from the synaptic cleft into these terminals via the serotonin transporter (5-HTT)3. In depression, the extensive degeneration of serotonergic neurons corresponds to the loss of 5-HTT4. Additionally, 5-HTT knockout mice show several behavioral changes, including increased anxiety-like behavior, increased sensitivity to stress, and inhibited exploratory locomotion5.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors δ (PPARδ), as one of the receptors in the PPAR nuclear receptor family, is a ligand-activated transcription factor. PPARδ regulates energy metabolism and mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle6. PPARδ shows a widespread brain distribution, it is least two-fold more highly expressed in brain than in muscle7. Recently, PPARδ was shown to play an important role in repress stress-induced depressive behaviors8 in addition to the regulation of serotonin transporter expression in hipopcampus9. Moreover, PPARδ activation also produces neuroprotection and reverses neurodegeneration in Alzheimer’s disease10,11, Parkinson’s disease12 and Huntington’s disease13. Generally, the hippocampus has been widely selected to investigate 5-HTT and PPARδ expression levels, as this brain region has been strongly implicated in the cause and consequences of both depression and chronic stress14.

Telmisartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB), is widely used to treat hypertension with the expectation of a decrease in the onset of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. As the most lipophilic agent with the longest half-life among ARBs15, telmisartan is known to cross the brain-blood barrier (BBB) for blockade of central AT1 receptors16. Telmisartan was identified to play a role in neurological system. Since BBB permeability is increased due to stress17, the effect of peripherally administered telmisartan on cerebral function seems sufficient to attenuate the stress-induced cognitive decline. Telmisartan exhibited anti-apoptosis, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant benefits in the intracerebral hemorrhage rat model18. In Parkinson’s disease, telmisartan was reported to protect mouse dopaminergic neurons and inhibit the microglial response19. Telmisartan has been recently discovered to activate PPARδ for the promotion of glucose uptake to improve insulin sensitivity and hyperglycemia-induced cardiac fibrosis20,21.

In the present study, we investigated the effect of telmisartan on stress-induced depression in animals. In the UCMS mice model, the behavior performances including open filed test (OFT) and the sucrose preference test (SPT) were evaluated. The effect of telmisartan and losartan, a selective AT receptor antagonist, also compared. Moreover, the expression levels of PPARδ and 5-HTT in the hippocampus between vehicle-treated group and telmisartan-treatment group were determined in UCMS mice. To further understanding the relationship between telmisartan and PPARδ, the expression of PPARδ were knockdown or knockout using PPARδ specific antagonist GSK0660 or ShRNA. Additionally, the effects of telmisartan on expressions of PPARδ and 5-HTT were further studied in the H19-7 cell line.


Telmisartan ameliorated anxiety- and depression-like behavior in UCMS mice

The open field test was performed to evaluate locomotion and anxiety-like behaviors; stress affected the time spent in the center and the periphery. Reduced time spent in the OFT center is used to measure the anxiety-like behavior. Mice that received daily oral administration of telmisartan showed a significant increase in the total distance travelled F(4,35) = 62.311, P < 0.05; Fig. 1A] and time spent in the central and was more likely to explore the environment than the vehicle-treated group [F(4,35) = 84.202, P < 0.05; Fig. 1B]. The number of grooming [F(4,35) = 24.598, P < 0.05] and rearing behavior [F(4,35) = 69.947, P < 0.05] were also markedly suppressed in the UCMS group [Fig. 1C,D]. Additionally, mice with UCMS showed less preference in sucrose intake, but the sucrose consumption was reversed in both telmisartan- and fluoxetine-treated groups [F(4,35) = 16.071, P < 0.05, Fig. 1E]. Moreover, in stress condition, the telmisartan produced significantly different results than that of the losartan, a selective AT receptor antagonist (p < 0.05). Overall, telmisartan showed a slightly smaller anti-depressant ability than fluoxetine, which is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) used to treat depression in clinics.

Figure 1

Telmisartan ameliorated the depression-like behavior through the PPARδ pathway in mice receiving UCMS. The animals were allowed to explore the open field arena for 5 min. (A) The total distance travelled; (B) the time spent in the central; (C) frequency of grooming; (D) frequency of rearing; (E) the percentage of sucrose solution consumed (%) in the sucrose preference test (SPT); (F) PPARδ expression levels in the hippocampus; (G) 5-HTT expression levels in the hippocampus. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to the corresponding control; #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 compared to the UCMS group. Full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Fig. S1.

Furthermore, the PPARδ and 5-HTT expression levels in the hippocampus were significantly reduced in mice receiving UCMS. Chronic administration of telmisartan reversed the UCMS-induced changes in hippocampal PPARδ [F(4,25) = 8.180, P < 0.05, Fig. 1E] and 5-HTT expressions [F(4,25) = 6.662, P < 0.05, Fig. 1F] seen with Western blots. Losartan treatment did not affected PPARδ and 5-HTT expressions in UCMS mice. These results indicated that telmisartan effectively attenuates the adverse effect of stress on depression-like behavior, and this action seems different with other AT1 blockade, associated with increased PPARδ activation in the hippocampus.

PPARδ antagonist inhibited the anti-depression-like effect of telmisartan in UCMS mice

For further investigation of the interaction between telmisartan and PPARδ in depression, PPARδ antagonist GSK0660 was administered into UCMS mice. Compared to the improvement in behavior observed in the telmisartan group, the total distance travelled [F(5,42) = 49.285, P < 0.05], the time spent in the central [F(5,42) = 46.881, P < 0.05], novelty-seeking behavior including rearings [F(5,42) = 18.898, P < 0.05] and grooming [F(4,35) = 26.573, P < 0.05] and percentile of sucrose preference [F(5,42) = 54.628, P < 0.05] in the UCMS group co-treated with telmisartan and GSK0660 was markedly decreased. However, the results also showed that the administration of GSK0660 only in the UCMS groups did not further deteriorate the depression-like behavior (Fig. 2A,B,C,D,E).

Figure 2

The PPARδ antagonist inhibited the anti-depression-like action of telmisartan in mice receiving UCMS. The PPARδ antagonist, GSK0660 (5 nmol.L−1, i.c.v), was administered 30 min before telmisartan treatment. In the open field test, the animals were allowed to explore the open field arena for 5 min. (A) the total distance travelled; (B) the time spent in the central; (C) frequency of grooming; (D) frequency of rearing; (E) the percentage of sucrose solution consumed (%) in the sucrose preference test (SPT); (F) PPARδ expression levels in the hippocampus of the various treatment groups; (G) 5-HTT expression levels in the hippocampus of the various treatment groups. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to the corresponding control; #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 compared to the UCMS group. Full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Fig. S2.

Compared to the control group, the expression of hippocampal PPARδ was significantly reduced in mice receiving UCMS, and this was reversed by telmisartan. Once PPARδ was blocked by GSK0660, the effect was extinguished [F(5,42) = 6.349, P < 0.05]. Likewise, a similar change in hippocampal 5-HTT expression [F(5,42) = 5.864, P < 0.05] was observed [Fig. 2F,G]. Aditionally, the treatment of GSK0660 decreased 5-HTT expression but did not affect behavior performances in control group. Taken together, the anti-depressive effect of telmisartan is likely to be PPARδ-dependent. Additionally, administration of GSK0660 alone in mice receiving UCMS did not cause any changes in behavioral performance or expression levels compared to that observed in the vehicle-treated group.

The anti-depressive effect of telmisartan disappeared in mice with hippocampal PPARδ knockdown

Then, we knocked down the expression of PPARδ using shRNA constructs in control and UCMS groups respectively. On the 7th day after the transfection of shRNA into the brain, decreased PPARδ expression in the hippocampus was identified. One week later, mice were treated following the procedure noted above. Changes in behavioral performance were then compared with that in animals injected with a scramble control. Mice with PPARδ knockout in hippocampus displayed a significantly decreased the total didtance of travelled and the time spent in the central. When PPARδ is silenced in control mice, telmisartan could not reverse the inactivated behavior (Fig. 3A,B,C,D,E]. Two-way ANOVA indicated telmisartan effects were dependent of the stress condition [effect of group, F(4,70) = 81.419, P < 0.05; effect of stress, F(1,70) = 338.827, P < 0.05; effect of group-by-stress interaction, F(4,70) = 53.853, P < 0.05]. Moreover, telmisartan increased the grooming and rearing in the OFT and the sucrose consumption in the SPT in the scramble group but not in that of the PPARδ knockdown animals only in UCMS mice [grooming: effect of group, F(4,70) = 15.791, P < 0.05; effect of stress, F(1,70) = 23.421, P < 0.05; effect of group-by-stress interaction, F(4,70) = 10.695, P < 0.05; rearing: effect of group, F(4,70) = 22.557, P < 0.05; effect of stress, F(1,70) = 65.24, P < 0.05; effect of group-by-stress interaction, F(4,70) = 10.155, P < 0.05; and glucose consumption: effect of group, F(4,70) = 15.345, P < 0.05; effect of stress, F(1,70) = 60.92, P < 0.05; effect of group-by-stress interaction, F(4,70) = 8.528, P < 0.05].

Figure 3

Changes of telmisartan-induced effects in the mice received hippocampal PPARδ knockdown. Normal mice and UCMS mice were transfected with scrambled shRNA or PPARδ shRNA, respectively. In the open field test, the animals were allowed to explore the open field arena for 5 min. (A) The total distance travelled; (B) the time spent in the central; (C) frequency of grooming; (D) frequency of rearing; (E) the percentage of sucrose solution consumed (%); (F) PPARδ expression levels in the hippocampus; (G) 5-HTT expression levels in the hippocampus. White columns indicated normal control goups, and black columns indecated UCMS goups. Data are presented as the mean ± SEM (n = 8 per group). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to the corresponding control; #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 compared to the UCMS group. Full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Fig. S3.

Furthermore, the reduction in the PPARδ levels in the hippocampus of scramble mice was reversed by telmisartan only in UCMS group [effect of group, F(4,50) = 13.325, P < 0.05; effect of stress, F(1,50) = 79.649, P < 0.05; effect of group-by-stress interaction, F(4,50) = 3.232, P < 0.05; Figs 3E, 4E]. Similar to the changes in PPARδ, the lower 5-HTT levels in the scramble group were also reversed after telmisartan treatment [effect of group, F(4,50) = 15.277, P < 0.05; effect of stress, F(1,50) = 35.710, P < 0.05; effect of group-by-stress interaction, F(4,50) = 3.589, P < 0.05; Figs 3F, 4G]. However, telmisartan failed to restore the PPARδ and 5-HTT expression levels in the PPARδ knockdown mice with or without UCMS. It indicated that PPARδ deficiency correlated with the development of depression. The effects of telmisartan in the improvement of depression induced by UCMS seem to be associated with the selective enhancement of PPARδ and 5-HTT expression levels.

Effect of telmisartan on blood pressure in UCMS mice

The mean systolic blood pressures in the vehicle-treated normal control group, telmisartan-treated normal group, UCMS + vehicle control group, and UCMS + telmisartan group were calculated at before, and the end of telmisartan treatment. As shown in Table 1, no statistical difference (P > 0.05) can be obtained in telmisartan-treated group at before and after stage, as that in vehicle-treated control (Table 1). Therefore, the behavioral effect of telmisartan seems to not be related to its antihypertensive action.

Table 1 Changes in systolic blood pressure of mice receiving telmisartan treatment.

Telmisartan increased PPARδ and 5-HTT expressions in the H19-7 cell line

To understand the direct effect of telmisartan on PPARδ and 5-HTT expression levels, H19-7 cells were treated with telmisartan (3 × 10−7 mol.L−1, 10−6 mol.L−1 and 3 × 10−6 mol.L−1) or vehicle (control) for 24 h. The results showed that telmisartan increased PPARδ expression in a concentration-dependent fashion (Fig. 4A). Increased expression of 5-HTT was also observed in cells treated with telmisartan in the same manner (Fig. 4B). However, 5-HTT levels were not increased in PPARδ-silenced cells, even when they were treated with telmisartan (Fig. 4C,D). These results show that PPARδ is able to regulate 5-HTT expressions. Therefore, telmisartan failed to affect 5-HTT expressions when PPARδ was absent in hippocampal cells.

Figure 4

Effect of telmisartan on PPARδ and 5-HTT expression levels in cultured H19-7 cells. Cultured hippocampal H19-7 cells were incubated with different doses of telmisartan at 5 × 10−7 M, 10−6 M, and 5 × 10−6 M for 24 h. (A) PPARδ expression level and (B) 5-HTT expression level. Cells were transfected with scramble shRNA (Sc) or PPARδ shRNA (Si) for 24 h and then treated with 5 × 10−6 M telmisartan for 24 h. (C) PPARδ expression level and (D) 5-HTT-expression level. Each column represents the mean ± SEM (n = 6). *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 compared to the corresponding control. Full-length blots are presented in Supplementary Fig. S4.


In the present study, we found that telmisartan is useful for alleviating the symptoms of depression. BALB/c mice are known to exhibit depressive-related behaviors when subjected to selected stress paradigms, offer much promise for the study of the stress response, and are good models for depression and the antidepressant treatment response in humans22. UCMS has been widely used in mice to mimic a depression-like disorder and is recognized as a reliable model of depression in humans23. Mice were exposed to UCMS and exhibited significant depressive behaviors, as shown by the decreased locomotor activity and suppressed grooming and rearing behavior in the OFT and reduced sucrose intake in the SPT. Additionally, food and water deprivation were applied in SPT, as described previously24,25. Chronic treatment with telmisartan significantly ameliorated the depressive-like behaviors in the chronic stress mice. Telmisartan effectively reversed the changes in the locomotor activity and frequency of grooming and rearing in the OFT and increased sucrose intake in the SPT. We have previously conducted some preliminary experiments and found no effect of telmisartan itself in normal mice. However, the anti-depressive action of telmisartan was still less than that of fluoxetine. In addition, telmisartan at the treated dosage did not affect blood pressure in mice that received UCMS. This is consistent with a previous report that reported that telmisartan at a non-hypotensive dose had beneficial effects on cognitive impairment26. A non-hypotensive dose of telmisartan preferentially promoted the expression of 5-HTT by activating PPARδ. It possibly because the wide distribution of PPARδ receptors in the brain, particularly the hippocampus.

Moreover, inhibition of brain AT1 receptor activity was approved to reduce stress responses and anxiety27. ARBs might have neuroprotective effect in addition to slow the progression of Alzheimer’s disease28. The antidepressant-like effect of ARBs has also been previously reported in depressed patients29. Additionally, our data showed that telmisartan was more effective on ameliorating depression-like behaviors in UCMS mice as compared with losartan. It means that telmisartan might act different with the other ARBs in depression treatment. Telmisartan can block cerebral AT1 receptors, which have a higher expression in the brain30. In contrast to classical ARBs, telmisartan is able to cross BBB31. Peripheral administration of losartan was less effective on cognitive function compared with telmisartan in diabetic mice32. However, directly injection of losartan into the amygdala showed anxiolytic-like effect in acute stressed rats33. Therefore, our results indicated that the absence of efficacy of losartan to counteract the UCMS effect is also probably due to the lack of BBB permeability.

Furthermore, ligands of PPARδ are known to interfere with 5-HTT signaling34. After a UCMS challenge, PPARδ and 5-HTT expression levels were both markedly reduced in the hippocampus as shown in the present study, which is in agreement with previous reports34,35. The levels of PPARδ and 5-HTT were effectively up regulated by telmisartan in the model group, indicating that the antidepressant-like action of telmisartan seems to be related to increased expression of PPARδ or 5-HTT. Notably, the amelioration of the behavioral performance in the OFT and SPT, as well as hippocampal PPARδ and 5-HTT expression levels, induced by telmisartan was inhibited by a PPARδ antagonist, GSK0660. Furthermore, down regulation of PPARδ alone reproduced the phenotypes of the UCMS as indicated in our previous study9. In PPARδ knockdown mice with UCMS, the depression-like behavior was significantly higher than those mice infected with the scrambled shRNA. The anti-depressive effect of telmisartan also disappeared once hippocampal PPARδs were silenced. Therefore, PPARδ is involved in the behavioral performance of mice, and telmisartan can promote PPARδ expression to improve depression-like behaviors.

PPARδ shows a relatively high neuronal expression compared with that of the other PPAR subtypes, both PPARα and PPARγ36. It has been mentioned that activation of PPARδ induces oligodendrocyte differentiation and enhances neuronal differentiation in the peripheral nervous system37,38. Additionally, a decrease in 5-HTT activity in the presynaptic membrane has been identified in depression patients38. Furthermore, depressive behaviors have also been observed in 5-HTT-knockout mice39. 5-HTT is one of the major modulators of 5-HT neurotransmission as it determines the magnitude and duration of 5-HT signaling. In the present study, changes in 5-HTT expressions were associated with PPARδ expression in both stress-induced depression mice and PPARδ-silenced mice. Therefore, PPARδ seems to interact with 5-HTT in the hippocampus. In cultured H19-7 hippocampus cells, we also demonstrated that PPARδ activation by telmisartan could increase 5-HTT expressions.

Chronic stress is associated with oxidative stress and promotes the production of reactive oxygen species, resulting in impaired function in the central nervous system40. Telmisartan as a unique ARB with a partial PPARδ agonistic property; has been shown to be neuroprotective and improve cognitive decline by reducing the levels of interleukin and TNF-α41,42,43. A recent study indicated that treatment with telmisartan reduced the levels of proinflammatory mediators and ameliorated the depression-like behaviors in diabetes-induced depression rats44. In addition, PPARδ activation in hypertensive rats is considered to contribute to the protection against cognitive decline, although it also up-regulates the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the hippocampus45. These findings probably explain why oral administration of the PPARδ antagonist GSK0660 or administration of PPARδ shRNA into the brain completely blocked the actions of telmisartan both in vivo and in vitro.


Overall, we provided promising and novel evidence that up-regulating hippocampal PPARδ by telmisartan results in an anti-depressive effect through the elevation of 5-HTT expressions. Our study suggests that hippocampal PPARδ is an important therapeutic target for depression. Telmisartan could be used for the development of treatments for depressive disorders in clinics.

Materials and Methods


A total of 142 male BALB/c mice weighing 22–30 g were obtained from the National Animal Center (Taipei, Taiwan) and maintained in the animal center of Chi Mei Medical Center (Tainan, Taiwan). The animals were housed 3–4 mice per cage on a 12/12-hr light/dark cycle with ad libitum access to food and water except during behavioral tests. Mice were introduced to the experiment room at least 1 h before the behavioral tests. This project was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chi Mei Medical Center (No. 105111531). All of the animal procedures were performed according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH Publication No. 85-23, revised 1996).

Treatment schedule

This study was conducted according to the experimental protocols described in Fig. 5.

Figure 5

Timeline of experimental procedures.

To investigate the effect of telmisartan on depression-like behavior in UCMS mice, mice were randomly divided into five groups (n = 8): control group, UCMS model group, UCMS + telmisartan (1−1) group26, UCMS + losartan (1−1) group, UCMS + fluoxetine (20−1) group46.

To investigate the role of telmisartan in PPARδ antagonist treated UCMS mice, mice were randomly divided into six groups (n = 8): control group, control group + GSK0660 (10−1), UCMS model group, UCMS + telmisartan (1−1) group, UCMS + GSK0660 (10−1) + telmisartan (1−1) group, and UCMS + GSK0660 (10−1).

To investigate the role of the role of telmisartan in PPARδ konckdown mice mice were randomly divided into 10 groups (n = 8): control, control + scramble, control + scramble + telmisartan, control + PPARδ shRNA, control + PPARδ shRNA + telmisartan, UCMS, UCMS + scramble, UCMS + scramble + telmisartan, UCMS + PPARδ shRNA, UCMS + PPARδ shRNA + telmisartan.

After an adaptation period (week 0 to week 1), mice were exposed to UCMS for 5 weeks (week 1 to week 6). Telmisartan, losartan and fluoxetine was administered 30 min by intragastric gavage before behavioral test and/or chronically 30 min before UCMS procedure to stressed as well as to unstressed control mice; while GSK0660 was administered by intraperitoneal injection, 30 min before drug treatment. All the animals were treated with respective drugs from week 1 to week 6. Behavioral testing was done in independent groups of mice in the week 7; all mice were subjected to one test daily, always in the same sequence. Blood pressure was measured every week during the experiment. Finally, all mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and each hippocampus was removed, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and kept at −80 °C for protein assays.

The establishment of the depression-like mouse model

The UCMS model was used to explore depressive-like behaviors in mice as described previously47,48. Experimental mice (n = 8 per group) were exposed to unpredictable mild stressors randomly every day in one week. The stressors applied included the following: water deprivation (24 h), food deprivation (24 h), reversed light/dark cycle (24 h), overnight illumination (12 h), soiled cage (12 h), and cage tilt (18 h, 45°). Each stressor was randomly assigned two or three times over a 5-week period. Stressors continued to be applied during the testing phase, except on testing days to avoid effects of acute stress. The non-stressed control mice were housed in groups (3–4 per cage), and the stressed mice were singly housed49. At least 12 h of rest was provided between a stressor and a test50. All of the procedures were organized in a random in order to ensure the unpredictable characteristic of the experiment.

Behavioral testing


Mice were placed in an open field area made of a 70 × 70 × 40 cm wooden box and equipped with an infrared floor to measure locomotor activity. The arena was subdivided into a central and a peripheral zone. Mice were placed in the open field boxes for 5 min under normal light conditions, and the locomotor activity of mice was automatically scored with a camera connected to a computerized system (Viewpoint, Lyon, France). Individual animals were gently placed in the same corner of the apparatus in all trials. Time stay in central, rearing (number of times the mice stood on their hind legs), grooming (total seconds of the mice spent licking or scratching itself) and excretion were observed51.


SPT is widely used to measure the anhedonic response, which was defined as a reduction in sucrose preference relative to baseline levels52,53. The mice were exposed to bottles, the one containing 1% sucrose and the other containing tap water for 24 h. After the deprivation of food and water overnight24, mice were used to receive the bottle of 1% (w/v) sucrose or the bottle of tap water for 1 hour. Then, the sucrose preference was evaluated according to the formula: sucrose preference = [sucrose intake/(sucrose intake + water intake)] × 100, as described previously53.

Blood pressure measurement

To investigate the possible effect of telmisartan on blood pressure in depression-like mice, the systolic blood pressures were measured in mice received telmisartan treatment and others using the tail-cuff method by a sphygmomanometer without animal heating (Muromachi Kikai Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The blood pressure of mice under anesthesia was measured at 15-min intervals. Each value was calculated as the average of 3 measurements.

Intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection

Mice were held in a towel with the dummy cannula to inject the testing agent as described previously54. Mice were anesthetized with a mixture of isoflurane in oxygen (2%) and placed in a Kopf stereotaxic instrument equipped with blunt ear bars. A dummy cannula was placed into the guide55. Mice were allowed to recover for 7 days.

The infusion cannula (22 gauge), attached to PE-10 tubing, was inserted into the guide cannula and extended 0.5 mm beyond the guide. A 10.0-μl Hamilton syringe was used to manually deliver saline or drugs over a two-minute period56. The infusion cannula was kept in place for an additional 1 min following infusion.

Moreover, the solution containing shRNA specific to PPARδ (Gene ID 25682) with an expression vector (pCMV6-Entry) was administered via ICV injection into mice using 25 μl of the prepared solution (0.12 μg.μl−1), while mice receiving a similar injection of an empty vector at the same volume were used as a control.

Cell Cultures

Rat-derived hippocampus H19-7 cell line cells (CRL-2526; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; HyClone, South Logan, UT, USA) with 4 mM l-glutamine that was adjusted with sodium bicarbonate (1.5 g/L), glucose (4.5 g/L), G418 (200 μg/mL), and puromycin (1 μg/mL) and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum57. Cells (1 × 106) were plated on 60-mm culture dishes, and at 80% confluence, they were differentiated by culturing for 6–7 days in DMEM containing 2% fetal bovine serum. Medium was changed every other day.

Western Blotting Analysis

Western blotting analysis was performed as previous58. Total protein lysates from mouse hippocampus or cells were extracted in lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris [pH 7.5] and 5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), containing a protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA). The protein concentration was determined with the BCA assay kit (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). The following primary antibodies were used at 4 °C overnight: anti-PPARδ (1:1000) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); anti-5-HTT (1:1000) (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany); anti-β actin (1:5000) (Merck Millipore) was used as an internal control. The next day, the blots were incubated with a 1/5000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies at 25 °C for 1 h. Protein bands were visualized using the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (PerkinElmer, Boston, MA, USA). The optical densities of the bands were determined using software (Gel-Pro Analyzer version 4.0 software; Media Cybernetics Inc., Silver Spring, MD, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as the mean-standard error of the mean. Statistical analyses one-way ANOVA was used to investigate the differences between groups with pharmacological treatments. Among multiple groups were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with “stress” and “drugs” are the factors to evaluate data in the knockdown experiments. If an interaction and/or main effect were observed, pairwise comparisons following ANOVA were made using Bonferroni post-hoc test. Data sets of two sample groups were analyzed using independent Student’s t-tests. All analyses were carried out by SPSS, version 21. Statistical differences were accepted at p < 0.05.


  1. 1.

    Hidaka, B. H. Depression as a disease of modernity: explanations for increasing prevalence. J Affect Disord 140, 205–214, (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Clark, L., Chamberlain, S. R. & Sahakian, B. J. Neurocognitive mechanisms in depression: implications for treatment. Annu Rev Neurosci 32, 57–74, (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Hansson, S. R., Mezey, E. & Hoffman, B. J. Serotonin transporter messenger RNA in the developing rat brain: early expression in serotonergic neurons and transient expression in non-serotonergic neurons. Neuroscience 83, 1185–1201 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Morozova, A. Y., Zubkov, E. A., Koshkin, F. A., Storozheva, Z. I. & Chekhonin, V. P. Expression of genes encoding serotonin receptors and SERT in various brain structures of stressed rats after chronic exposure to ultrasound. Bull Exp Biol Med 156, 317–319, (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Holmes, A., Yang, R. J., Lesch, K. P., Crawley, J. N. & Murphy, D. L. Mice lacking the serotonin transporter exhibit 5-HT(1A) receptor-mediated abnormalities in tests for anxiety-like behavior. Neuropsychopharmacology 28, 2077–2088, (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Luquet, S. et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor delta controls muscle development and oxidative capability. FASEB J 17, 2299–2301, (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Girroir, E. E. et al. Quantitative expression patterns of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-beta/delta (PPARbeta/delta) protein in mice. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 371, 456–461, (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ji, M. J. et al. Hippocampal PPARdelta Overexpression or Activation Represses Stress-Induced Depressive Behaviors and Enhances Neurogenesis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 19, (2016).

  9. 9.

    Liu, K. F. et al. Changes in PPARdelta expression in a rat model of stress-induced depression. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 44, 664–670, (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tong, M., Dominguez, C., Didsbury, J. & de la Monte, S. M. Targeting Alzheimer’s Disease Neuro-Metabolic Dysfunction with a Small Molecule Nuclear Receptor Agonist (T3D-959) Reverses Disease Pathologies. J Alzheimers Dis Parkinsonism 6, (2016).

  11. 11.

    Malm, T., Mariani, M., Donovan, L. J., Neilson, L. & Landreth, G. E. Activation of the nuclear receptor PPARdelta is neuroprotective in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease through inhibition of inflammation. J Neuroinflammation 12, 7, (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Martin, H. L. et al. A peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta agonist provides neuroprotection in the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine model of Parkinson’s disease. Neuroscience 240, 191–203, (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dickey, A. S. et al. PPAR-delta is repressed in Huntington’s disease, is required for normal neuronal function and can be targeted therapeutically. Nat Med 22, 37–45, (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Colla, M. et al. Hippocampal volume reduction and HPA-system activity in major depression. J Psychiatr Res 41, 553–560, (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Kakuta, H., Sudoh, K., Sasamata, M. & Yamagishi, S. Telmisartan has the strongest binding affinity to angiotensin II type 1 receptor: comparison with other angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res 25, 41–46 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wang, J. M., Tan, J. & Leenen, F. H. Central nervous system blockade by peripheral administration of AT1 receptor blockers. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 41, 593–599 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Skultetyova, I., Tokarev, D. & Jezova, D. Stress-induced increase in blood-brain barrier permeability in control and monosodium glutamate-treated rats. Brain Res Bull 45, 175–178 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kasahara, Y. et al. Telmisartan suppresses cerebral injury in a murine model of transient focal ischemia. Brain Res 1340, 70–80, (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Garrido-Gil, P., Joglar, B., Rodriguez-Perez, A. I., Guerra, M. J. & Labandeira-Garcia, J. L. Involvement of PPAR-gamma in the neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory effects of angiotensin type 1 receptor inhibition: effects of the receptor antagonist telmisartan and receptor deletion in a mouse MPTP model of Parkinson’s disease. J Neuroinflammation 9, 38, (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Li, L. et al. Telmisartan improves insulin resistance of skeletal muscle through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-delta activation. Diabetes 62, 762–774, (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Chang, W. T., Cheng, J. T. & Chen, Z. C. Telmisartan improves cardiac fibrosis in diabetes through peroxisome proliferator activated receptor delta (PPARdelta): from bedside to bench. Cardiovasc Diabetol 15, 113, (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Marona-Lewicka, D. & Vetulani, J. Neurochemical correlates of differences in responses to psychotropic drugs. I. Apomorphine and morphine effects on locomotor activity of C57/BL and Balb/C mice. Pol J Pharmacol Pharm 41, 431–438 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Willner, P., Towell, A., Sampson, D., Sophokleous, S. & Muscat, R. Reduction of sucrose preference by chronic unpredictable mild stress, and its restoration by a tricyclic antidepressant. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 93, 358–364 (1987).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Muscat, R. & Willner, P. Suppression of sucrose drinking by chronic mild unpredictable stress: a methodological analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 16, 507–517 (1992).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Stephan, F. K. & Zucker, I. Circadian rhythms in drinking behavior and locomotor activity of rats are eliminated by hypothalamic lesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69, 1583–1586 (1972).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Washida, K. et al. Nonhypotensive dose of telmisartan attenuates cognitive impairment partially due to peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activation in mice with chronic cerebral hypoperfusion. Stroke 41, 1798–1806, (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Saavedra, J. M., Sanchez-Lemus, E. & Benicky, J. Blockade of brain angiotensin II AT1 receptors ameliorates stress, anxiety, brain inflammation and ischemia: Therapeutic implications. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36, 1–18, (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Savaskan, E. et al. Cortical alterations of angiotensin converting enzyme, angiotensin II and AT1 receptor in Alzheimer’s dementia. Neurobiol Aging 22, 541–546 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Nasr, S. J., Crayton, J. W., Agarwal, B., Wendt, B. & Kora, R. Lower frequency of antidepressant use in patients on renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system modifying medications. Cell Mol Neurobiol 31, 615–618, (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lu, D. & Raizada, M. K. Delivery of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antisense inhibits angiotensin action in neurons from hypertensive rat brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92, 2914–2918 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Noda, A. et al. Brain penetration of telmisartan, a unique centrally acting angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, studied by PET in conscious rhesus macaques. Nucl Med Biol 39, 1232–1235, (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Min, L. J. et al. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activation with angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockade is pivotal for the prevention of blood-brain barrier impairment and cognitive decline in type 2 diabetic mice. Hypertension 59, 1079–1088, (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Llano Lopez, L. H. et al. Anxiolytic-like effect of losartan injected into amygdala of the acutely stressed rats. Pharmacol Rep 64, 54–63 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ji, M. J. et al. Hippocampal PPARdelta Overexpression or Activation Represses Stress-Induced Depressive Behaviors and Enhances Neurogenesis. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 19, (2015).

  35. 35.

    Tang, M., Lei, J., Sun, X., Liu, G. & Zhao, S. Stress-induced anhedonia correlates with lower hippocampal serotonin transporter protein expression. Brain Res 1513, 127–134, (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lemberger, T., Desvergne, B. & Wahli, W. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: a nuclear receptor signaling pathway in lipid physiology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 12, 335–363, (1996).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    D’Angelo, B. et al. Signal transduction pathways involved in PPARbeta/delta-induced neuronal differentiation. J Cell Physiol 226, 2170–2180, (2011).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Saluja, I., Granneman, J. G. & Skoff, R. P. PPAR delta agonists stimulate oligodendrocyte differentiation in tissue culture. Glia 33, 191–204 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Jiang, X. et al. Stress impairs 5-HT2A receptor-mediated serotonergic facilitation of GABA release in juvenile rat basolateral amygdala. Neuropsychopharmacology 34, 410–423, (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Miller, A. H., Maletic, V. & Raison, C. L. Inflammation and its discontents: the role of cytokines in the pathophysiology of major depression. Biol Psychiatry 65, 732–741, (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Tsukuda, K. et al. Cognitive deficit in amyloid-beta-injected mice was improved by pretreatment with a low dose of telmisartan partly because of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma activation. Hypertension 54, 782–787, (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kurihara, T. et al. Neuroprotective effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blocker, telmisartan, via modulating AT1R and AT2R signaling in retinal inflammation. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 47, 5545–5552, (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Kobayashi, T. et al. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker telmisartan reduces cerebral infarct volume and peri-infarct cytosolic phospholipase A(2) level in experimental stroke. J Neurotrauma 26, 2355–2364, (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Aswar, U., Chepurwar, S., Shintre, S. & Aswar, M. Telmisartan attenuates diabetes induced depression in rats. Pharmacol Rep 69, 358–364, (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Kishi, T., Hirooka, Y. & Sunagawa, K. Telmisartan protects against cognitive decline via up-regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor/tropomyosin-related kinase B in hippocampus of hypertensive rats. J Cardiol 60, 489–494, (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Nollet, M. et al. Neurogenesis-independent antidepressant-like effects on behavior and stress axis response of a dual orexin receptor antagonist in a rodent model of depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 37, 2210–2221, (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Elizalde, N. et al. Sustained stress-induced changes in mice as a model for chronic depression. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 210, 393–406, (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Briones, A. et al. Stress-induced anhedonia is associated with an increase in Alzheimer’s disease-related markers. Br J Pharmacol 165, 897–907, (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Tianzhu, Z., Shihai, Y. & Juan, D. Antidepressant-like effects of cordycepin in a mice model of chronic unpredictable mild stress. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2014, 438506, (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Rowland, N. E. Food or fluid restriction in common laboratory animals: balancing welfare considerations with scientific inquiry. Comp Med 57, 149–160 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Prut, L. & Belzung, C. The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review. Eur J Pharmacol 463, 3–33 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Janowsky, D. S., Pucilowski, O. & Buyinza, M. Preference for higher sucrose concentrations in cocaine abusing-dependent patients. J Psychiatr Res 37, 35–41 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Bessa, J. M. et al. The mood-improving actions of antidepressants do not depend on neurogenesis but are associated with neuronal remodeling. Mol Psychiatry 14, 764–773, (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kim, M. S. et al. Chronic central administration of ghrelin reverses the effects of leptin. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28, 1264–1271, (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    DeVos, S. L. & Miller, T. M. Direct intraventricular delivery of drugs to the rodent central nervous system. J Vis Exp, e50326, (2013).

  56. 56.

    Maleki, S. A. et al. Potentiation of morphine-induced conditioned place preference with concurrent use of amantadine and fluvoxamine by the intraperitoneal and intracerebroventricular injection in rat. Behav Brain Res 190, 189–192, (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Huang, C. W. et al. Pregabalin attenuates excitotoxicity in diabetes. PLoS One 8, e65154, (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Mahmood, T. & Yang, P. C. Western blot: technique, theory, and trouble shooting. N Am J Med Sci 4, 429–434, (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information




Y.L., K.C.C. and K.F.L. designed the study and performed experiments. Y.L., K.C.C. and K.F.L. managed the literature searches and analyses. Y.L., K.C.C., W.H.P. undertook the statistical analysis. All authors contributed to and have approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Juei-Tang Cheng or Ho-Shan Niu.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Cheng, K., Liu, K. et al. Telmisartan Activates PPARδ to Improve Symptoms of Unpredictable Chronic Mild Stress-Induced Depression in Mice. Sci Rep 7, 14021 (2017).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing