Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Distinguishing crystallization stages and their influence on quantum efficiency during perovskite solar cell formation in real-time



Relating crystallization of the absorber layer in a perovskite solar cell (PSC) to the device performance is a key challenge for the process development and in-depth understanding of these types of high efficient solar cells. A novel approach that enables real-time photo-physical and electrical characterization using a graphite-based PSC is introduced in this work. In our graphite-based PSC, the device architecture of porous monolithic contact layers creates the possibility to perform photovoltaic measurements while the perovskite crystallizes within this scaffold. The kinetics of crystallization in a solution based 2-step formation process has been analyzed by real-time measurement of the external photon to electron quantum efficiency as well as the photoluminescence emission spectra of the solar cell. With this method it was in particular possible to identify a previously overlooked crystallization stage during the formation of the perovskite absorber layer. This stage has significant influence on the development of the photocurrent, which is attributed to the formation of electrical pathways between the electron and hole contact, enabling efficient charge carrier extraction. We observe that in contrast to previously suggested models, the perovskite layer formation is indeed not complete with the end of crystal growth.


In the past few years, great improvements of performance and stability of hybrid organic-inorganic perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have been achieved by solution processing1,2,3,4,5. Tailoring the contact materials and absorber material composition4,5 as well as optimizing the perovskite formation procedures6,7 enabled conversion efficiencies above 20%8.

In order to control the formation of perovskite layers in high-efficiency solar cells, understanding the crystallization kinetics and its influence on the photovoltaic performance is fundamental. So far crystallization kinetics of perovskites have only been studied extensively on free-standing films9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. To fabricate complete cells, after perovskite film formation, a consecutive deposition of the counter electrode is needed for charge extraction. Therefore, with previous approaches it was not possible to directly relate the perovskite cell performance to the crystallization kinetics and a method to monitor the photo-physical and electric properties from the very beginning was still pending.

In this work, we present an approach to directly link the photovoltaic evolvement and the crystallization in real-time throughout the formation of the perovskite solar cell. We performed real-time characterization, showing the external quantum efficiency (EQE) at fixed wavelengths as well as the spectrally resolved photoluminescence (PL) emission throughout the entire process of the perovskite crystal formation (cf. Fig. 1a). Direct charge extraction during crystallization is enabled by using a monolithic contact scaffold with a graphite counter electrode17,18,19,20. We form the perovskite by a standard 2-step reaction process21. Thereby, the inorganic metal-halide salt (most commonly lead iodide, PbI2) is first applied and interacts in a second step with a metal-organic halide salt (most commonly methyl ammonium iodide, MAI), dissolved in a non-polar solvent.

Figure 1

Experimental setup for real-time crystallization monitoring. (a) Illustration of the experimental setup for real-time PL and EQE monitoring during perovskite formation upon immersion in MAI solution. (b) SEM image along the cross-section a perovskite filled graphite cell and close-up images of EDX-maps for the elements Pb (indicating perovskite infiltration inside the porous scaffold), Ti (indicating the porous TiO2 electron selective layer), Zr (indicating the porous ZrO space layer) and C (indicating the porous graphite back electrode).

After an exhaustive STN literature search, we come to the conclusion that this is the first time that the photovoltaic effect of a solid state solar cell device is observed during crystal formation. In the following, we demonstrate the potential of this technique to link the photovoltaic properties to the critical kinetics of perovskite conversion and crystallization from solution.


Photoluminescence measurements

For the formation of the perovskite, the PbI2-filled porous cell structure is immersed in MAI solution. The formation of perovskite can be observed by the naked eye as the yellow PbI2-film turns dark within 9 minutes (cf. Supplementary Fig. S1). Deeper insight in this reaction can be gained from the photoluminescence (PL) signal of the perovskite. Figure 2 shows the PL intensity (Fig. 2a) and the spectral position of the PL peak (Fig. 2b) during this reaction. These parameters were obtained from a Gaussian peak fit to the spectrally resolved PL data. From the change of dynamics in the PL signal we can directly distinguish three different stages during perovskite crystallization, as indicated by different coloring in Fig. 2: A stage i) in which a strong PL intensity rise peaks after approximately 3 min of MAI dipping. And a second stage ii) in which the signal decreases until minute 8. After this point the signal sharply turns into steady state. The occurrence of the same stages is also observed in the behavior of the spectral peak position which exhibits a red-shift throughout the first 8 minutes before reaching a stable level at 771 nm. The spatial distribution of the PL emission of the complete cell as measured with a confocal PL microscope (cf. Supplementary Fig. S5) reveals a homogeneous PL throughout the active area of the analyzed cell.

Figure 2

Real-time measurements of photo-physical and electrical properties during perovskite crystallization. (a) Photoluminescence intensity and (b) spectral peak position as well as (c) EQE measurements performed at 700 nm throughout the four reaction stages (i to iv) during MAI-immersion.

Photovoltaic effect

The external photon to electron quantum efficiency (EQE) at 700 nm was traced as displayed in Fig. 2c. The EQE rises throughout stages i), ii) and iii) and after 15 minutes remains at an almost stable value, marking the onset of stage iv). Revealingly, in the first three stages the EQE increases in distinct rates: there is a strong but short rise in stage i), followed by a slower rise in stage ii). The most significant increase in EQE takes place in stage iii). We note that the onsets of the stages do not match completely between the PL and the EQE at 700 nm as they were recorded on different cells. Illumination with 700 nm wavelength was chosen from the flat region of the EQE spectral curve, which significantly contributes to the overall short-circuit current. Also this wavelength is suitable in order to avoid current contributions from possible electrochemical mechanisms given by the light absorption of TiO2 and PbI2 in the presence of an electrolyte-like solution (MAI in 2-propanol), as discussed in the Supplementary Information.


From the above findings that the PL intensity is peaking already in the earlier stage of the perovskite growth while the mayor part of the photocurrent develops significantly later, we suggest the following model for the 2-step perovskite reaction process from solution (cf. Figure 3 for a schematic illustration):

Figure 3

Schematic evolution of 2-step perovskite formation during MAI-immersion. Displayed are the first three stages of internal perovskite formation for the entire solar cell stack (top) and a magnified view on a single pore (bottom): After a nucleation of single perovskite crystals on the PbI2 surface (i) the entire PbI2 grain is converted gradually from the shell to the center until the conversion to perovskite is complete (ii). Finally, the perovskite reorients inside the pore for an optimal embeddedness (iii).

In stage i), the initial reaction with the MAI solution results in perovskite nucleation on the outer shell of the PbI2 grains10,14,15,22,23 as has already been suggested by Liao et al., for planar devices24. The increase of perovskite amount in this initial stage is reflected back in a rise of the PL intensity (cf. Fig. 2a).

Looking at the spectral position of the PL peak enables to relate the observed increase in PL intensity also to the growth of the crystals. The spectral position of the PL peak provides information about the band gap of the perovskite absorber. Previous investigations of the correlation of crystal size and spectral position of the perovskite PL peak revealed that small crystals exhibit a wider band gap than larger crystals25,26,27,28,29. Based on this observation, the interpretation of the time-dependent red shift of the spectral peak position as shown in Fig. 2b until the end of stage ii) can therefore be attributed to the growth of individual perovskite crystals, which is in good agreement with previous observations for the 2-step process14,16. Competing effects from spectral reabsorption is assumed to not play a major role in this trend since this would result in a reduced PL peak width, which is not observed (cf. Supplementary Fig. S4).

In stage i), the onset of the photocurrent, as reflected from the EQE at 700 nm, initially remains at an overall low level. The presence of a photocurrent requires that generated charge carriers are extracted from the contact layers. At this stage this means that not all crystals are electrically isolated but there are already to some extent perovskite crystals forming electrical pathways between the TiO2 and the graphite contact layers. As discussed in the Supplementary Information, we note that also an additional charge transport operated by the MAI-solution might contribute at a low fraction to the EQE.

In the evolution of the PL peak position and EQE in stages i) and ii) we observe a clear distinction of kinetics. We attribute this behavior to a fast surface reaction between the MAI-solution and the pristine PbI2 crystals, followed by a diffusion limited transport of MAI through the resulting perovskite shell, in accordance to the findings of Miyadera et al.22. The most distinct behavior in stage ii) is the strong decrease of the PL intensity which we interpret as a result of the merging of individual crystals which favors non-radiative energy transfer. At the end of stage ii), the photoactive layer is completely filled with perovskite which is also evident from the optically dark appearance of the device (cf. Supplementary Fig. S1). Comparable peaking of the photoluminescence and correlations to data from XRD have already been observed in literature13 for crystallization of bare perovskite films fabricated by a 1-step process30,31 where the perovskite crystals are formed from a single solution comprising the perovskite precursor materials. It was presumed that, as no change in the PL-signal is observed, also the perovskite formation should be completed. In our work however, employing the real-time monitoring of the EQE it seems that this presumption is incomplete. Our results indicate the existence of an additional third stage during which the main increase in the EQE is observed as shown in Fig. 2. Therefore, it is evident, that although the conversion from PbI2 to perovskite is mostly completed and further growth of perovskite has ended, there is still a “maturation” process going on which enables efficient charge transport and extraction.

A possible explanation for this behavior could be the reorientation of the perovskite on the surface of the porous charge extraction scaffolds, facilitated by the presence of mobile ions in the solution. Such an effect of perovskite reorientation has been reported in a different context by Hsieh et al. in SEM investigations of 2-step formation of perovskite on porous TiO2 layers16. In any case, stage iii) leads to the establishment of improved electrical pathways between the front and back contact as indicated by the strong increase of EQE at 700 nm. Finally, in stage iv) both the photoluminescence and the EQE signals are stationary which shows that the solution based 2-step formation process is completed.

In conclusion, understanding the relations between crystal formation and photovoltaic performance of perovskite solar cells is a major challenge for an in-depth understanding and the development of optimal fabrication procedures of these novel devices. In the literature reported so far, measurement of the photovoltaic properties of perovskite solar cells and of solid state solar cells in general has only been possible at the end of the fabrication process. Here, we introduced a novel time-resolved real-time probing of photophysical and electrical solar cell parameters during perovskite crystal formation in complete graphite-based monolithic perovskite solar cells. The capabilities of the method was demonstrated exploring the crystallization mechanisms of a 2-step solution based perovskite reaction process. Photoluminescence (PL) measurements enabled real-time monitoring of the perovskite crystal formation. A sharp initial PL intensity increase and the red-shift of the PL peak position reflected an increase in the crystal size during perovskite conversion within the scaffold pores. In a consecutive stage, the PL intensity decreases and a further red-shift of the peak position indicated a further growth of the perovskite grains to a point where boundary effects further quench the PL intensity. A stable grain size was observed by the end of this second stage. Surprisingly, although the crystals did not alter further in size, the photocurrent of the cell, as reflected by real-time measurements of the EQE, still remained marginal. The most significant increase in photocurrent was observed after this point, which we ascribed to improved electrical connection to the contact layers by a final allignment of the perovskite surface to the porous scaffold. The identification of this third stage subsequent to the finalization of crystal growth highlights the potential of this novel real-time method. The possibility to access the photovoltaic properties of the evolving perovskite layer can therefore be used to refine crystallization models and to gain better control on fabrication processes.


Perovskite solar cell formation

The graphite based cells used in this work comprised of a stack of dense and mesoporous titanium dioxide (TiO2) as electron selective contact, a space layer of mesoporous zirconium dioxide (ZrO2), and a counter electrode of graphite flakes. All porous layers were filled with PbI2. To form the perovskite layer, the substrate is dipped in a container containing the MAI-solution with the graphite-side facing the solution. Photographs of the cell during perovskite evolution can be found in the Supplementary Information. From the top side, the device can be illuminated through the glass substrate enabling tracking of the measured parameters. Thereby, EQE data and the PL spectra were recorded in-situ over a MAI-immersion period of 30 minutes with the analysis providing detailed time-resolved data about device performance and crystallization properties. To ensure reproducibility, the experiments were repeated for each measurement configuration with an overall count exceeding 50 individual cells. The variety of results from different cells as presented in the Supplementary Fig. S6 shows that there are slight deviations in the time constants, giving nevertheless a consistent behavior in the progress of the stages (i to iv) For the sake of clarity, one exemplary curve for each method is presented; additional data can be found in the Supplementary Information.

Photoluminescence measurement

The photoluminescence (PL) properties were tracked using a fiber coupled PL spectroscopy setup32. Locally excited with a frequency doubled Nd:YAG laser (532 nm), applying a photon flux of 2.68 × 1017 photons/(s cm2) (near to real cell operating conditions), the emitted light is spectrally resolved using a diffraction grating and detected by a silicon charge coupled device (Si-CCD). Since the excitation spot of 2.8 × 10−2 cm2 (calculated from FWHM) is smaller than the device area, the measurement yields an average value of the illuminated area. All PL measurements were performed without contacting the cell and using a continuous mode with an integration time of 0.1 s and a repetition rate of 10 Hz. The measurements were performed at ambient temperature with no significant temperature increase related to the sample illumination. In the post-annealing stage, the lateral distribution of the PL emission was analyzed by mapping the cell’s active area using confocal microscopy33.

Spectral Response/EQE

The time-resolved EQE (or spectral response) measurements were conducted with a laser-based setup developed in-house at Fraunhofer ISE33. The cells were short-circuited using a transimpedance amplifier and illuminated by monochromatic radiation at both 350 and 700 nm simultaneously34. In addition, steady-state bias light from LEDs emitting at 465 nm and 660 nm was applied and set to 1.1 × 1016 photons/(cm² s), equivalent to approximately 0.1 suns bias irradiance for the completed devices. The monochromatic radiation was frequency-modulated by mechanical chopper wheels at 70 and 90 Hz (for 700 nm and 350 nm, respectively). Lock-in amplifiers were used to distinguish alternating current generated from the monochromatic radiation and direct current resulting from the bias light. Linearity of the devices is assumed so that their differential current response to the chopped monochromatic radiation is approximated as EQE34.

The setup has been calibrated by a silicon reference solar cell and fluctuations of the monochromatic light were corrected by using a silicon monitor diode. The illuminated area was significantly larger than the device so that the active cell area was defined by a shadowing mask of approximately 0.4 cm² which was placed on top of the glass.

The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Zhou, H. et al. Interface engineering of highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Science 345, 542–546 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Jeon, N. J. et al. Compositional engineering of perovskite materials for high-performance solar cells. Nature 517, 476–480 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Yi, C., Li, X., Luo, J., Zakeeruddin, S. M. & Gratzel, M. Perovskite photovoltaics with outstanding performance produced by chemical conversion of bilayer mesostructured lead halide/TiO2 films. Advanced Materials 28, 2964–2970 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Saliba, M. et al. Cesium-containing triple cation perovskite solar cells: improved stability, reproducibility and high efficiency. Energy & Environmental Science 9, 1989–1997 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Saliba, M. et al. Incorporation of rubidium cations into perovskite solar cells improves photovoltaic performance. Science 354, 206–209 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Correa-Baena, J.-P. et al. The rapid evolution of highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Energy & Environmental Science 10, 710–727 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fakharuddin, A., Rossi, F., de, Watson, T. M., Schmidt-Mende, L. & Jose, R. Research Update. Behind the high efficiency of hybrid perovskite solar cells. APL Materials 4, 91505 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Green, M. A. et al. Solar cell efficiency tables (version 49). Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 25, 3–13 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Song, Z., Watthage, S. C., Phillips, A. B. & Heben, M. J. Pathways toward high-performance perovskite solar cells. Review of recent advances in organo-metal halide perovskites for photovoltaic applications. Journal of Photonics for Energy 6, 22001 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Moore, D. T. et al. Crystallization kinetics of organic-inorganic trihalide perovskites and the role of the lead anion in crystal growth. Journal of the American Chemical Society 137, 2350–2358 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dualeh, A. et al. Effect of annealing temperature on film morphology of organic-inorganic hybrid perovskite solid-state solar cells. Advanced Functional Materials 24, 3250–3258 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wang, B., Young Wong, K., Xiao, X. & Chen, T. Elucidating the reaction pathways in the synthesis of organolead trihalide perovskite for high-performance solar cells. Scientific Reports 5, 10557 (2015).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Anaya, M., Galisteo-Lopez, J. F., Calvo, M. E., Lopez, C. & Miguez, H. Photophysical analysis of the formation of organic-inorganic trihalide perovskite films: identification and characterization of crystal nucleation and growth. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 120, 3071–3076 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Schlipf, J. et al. A closer look into two-step perovskite conversion with x-ray scattering. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 6, 1265–1269 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Liu, W. et al. Nucleation mechanism of CH3NH3PbI3 with two-step method for rational design of high performance perovskite solar cells. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 697, 374–379 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Hsieh, T.-Y., Huang, C.-K., Su, T.-S., Hong, C.-Y. & Wei, T.-C. Crystal growth and dissolution of methylammonium lead iodide perovskite in sequential deposition: correlation between morphology evolution and photovoltaic performance. ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces 9, 8623–8633 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Ku, Z., Rong, Y., Xu, M., Liu, T. & Han, H. Full printable processed mesoscopic CH3NH3PbI3/TiO2 heterojunction solar cells with carbon counter electrode. Scientific Reports 3, 3132 (2013).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mei, A. et al. A hole-conductor-free, fully printable mesoscopic perovskite solar cell with high stability. Science 345, 295–298 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Priyadarshi, A. et al. A large area (70 cm2) monolithic perovskite solar module with a high efficiency and stability. Energy & Environmental Science 9, 3687–3692 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tsai, C.-M. et al. Control of preferred orientation with slow crystallization for carbon-based mesoscopic perovskite solar cells attaining efficiency 15%. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 5, 739–747 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Burschka, J. et al. Sequential deposition as a route to high-performance perovskite-sensitized solar cells. Nature 499, 316–319 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Miyadera, T. et al. Crystallization dynamics of organolead halide perovskite by real-time x-ray diffraction. Nano letters 15, 5630–5634 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wakamiya, A. et al. Reproducible fabrication of efficient perovskite-based solar cells. X-ray crystallographic studies on the formation of CH3NH3PbI3 layers. Chemistry Letters 43, 711–713 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Liao, H.-C. et al. Hierarchical i–p and i–n porous heterojunction in planar perovskite solar cells. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 3, 10526–10535 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Mastroianni, S. et al. Analysing the effect of crystal size and structure in highly efficient CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cells by spatially resolved photo- and electroluminescence imaging. Nanoscale 7, 19653–19662 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Nie, W. et al. High-efficiency solution-processed perovskite solar cells with millimeter-scale grains. Science 347, 522–525 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Grancini, G. et al. CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite single crystals: surface photophysics and their interaction with the environment. Chemical Science 6, 7305–7310 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Grancini, G. et al. Role of microstructure in the electron–hole interaction of hybrid lead halide perovskites. Nature Photonics 9, 695–701 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    D’Innocenzo, V., Srimath Kandada, A. R., Bastiani, M., de, Gandini, M. & Petrozza, A. Tuning the light emission properties by band gap engineering in hybrid lead halide perovskite. Journal of the American Chemical Society 136, 17730–17733 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Kim, H.-S. et al. Lead iodide perovskite sensitized all-solid-state submicron thin film mesoscopic solar cell with efficiency exceeding 9%. Scientific Reports 2, 591 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Lee, M. M., Teuscher, J., Miyasaka, T., Murakami, T. N. & Snaith, H. J. Efficient hybrid solar cells based on meso-superstructured organometal halide perovskites. Science 338, 643–647 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gundel, P., Heinz, F. D., Schubert, M. C., Giesecke, J. A. & Warta, W. Quantitative carrier lifetime measurement with micron resolution. J. Appl. Phys. 108, 33705 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Mundus, M. Ultrashort Laser Pulses for Electrical Characterization of Solar Cells. PhD Thesis (Fraunhofer Verlag, 2016).

  34. 34.

    Mundus, M. et al. Spectrally resolved nonlinearity and temperature dependence of perovskite solar cells. Sol. Energ. Mater. Sol. C. 172, 66–73 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work has been partially funded within the project meso-PIN (grant agreement no. 03SF0484A) by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). Lukas Wagner gratefully acknowledges the scholarship support of the German Federal Environmental Foundation (DBU). Laura Mundt, Markus Mundus and Martin Schubert acknowledge support from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi) within the research cluster “Persist“ (Grant agreement no. 0324037 A). Gayathri Mathiazhagan is obliged for the scholarship support of Landesgraduiertenförderungsgesetzes (LGFG). The authors thank Bhavana Venkataramanachar for conducting the EQE measurements.

Author information




L.W., S.M., and A.H. contributed to the conception and design of the experiment. L.E.M. carried out PL measurements and interpretation. M.M. carried out EQE measurements and interpretation. G.M. was responsible for device manufacturing. L.W., L.E.M., G.M., M.M., M.C.S., S.M., U.W., S.W.G., and A.H. contributed to analysis of the data, design of the crystallization model and writing the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lukas Wagner or Laura E. Mundt.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wagner, L., Mundt, L.E., Mathiazhagan, G. et al. Distinguishing crystallization stages and their influence on quantum efficiency during perovskite solar cell formation in real-time. Sci Rep 7, 14899 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing