Gem-diol and Ketone Crystal-to-crystal Transition Phenomena

Abstract

The generally thought unstable diol compound tetrazyl gem-diol (1, H2DTMdiol·2H2O), was firstly obtained in crystalline form by culturing the filtrate for ten days after acidification and filtration of aqueous solution of potassium salt of ketone (2, [K(HDTMone)·2H2O]n). The stability of this novel gem-diol compound is found owning to the hydrogen bonds with lattice water molecules and electrophilic tetrazolyl groups. Meanwhile, the undissolved ketone (3, H2DTMone) was separated during the filtration in the process of gem-diol compound production. Surprisingly, the crystal-to-crystal perfect transition phenomena from gem-diol (1) to ketone (3) were firstly observed after heating up to 120 °C as evidenced by X-ray single crystal diffraction and powder X-ray diffraction. These results found here might open new revenues for methylene oxidation and alkanediol chemistry.

Introduction

A very rare phenomenon was observed by chance at the attempt to develop new HEDMs (high-energy-density materials). Introducing effective oxygen atoms is a very important and simple way to design new HEDMs with better detonation properties since nitration reaction is the most common method in this field. It is obvious that oxidation of -CH2- can introduce effective oxygen atoms. So the oxidation of di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methane (4, H2DTMane) was conducted using potassium permanganate as oxidizing agent. And the crystalline tetrazyl gem-diol (-C(OH)2-) compound, di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methanediol dihydrate (1, H2DTMdiol·2H2O) (see Fig. 1), was obtained for the first time.

Figure 1
figure1

The structures of compound 1 to 4.

The electron withdrawing groups in the previously reported crystalline gem-diol compounds include trichloromethyl, pyridyl, ester group etc except tetrazyl1,2,3,4,5,6,7. This discovery is very important to gem-diol chemistry since none of crystalline tetrazyl gem-diol compound has been reported until now.

As known, compounds based on azoles are ubiquitous and have attracted much attention owing to their variety of applications in medicine, biology and material science8,9,10. Among them, tetrazole and its derivatives have drawn researchers’ attention in developing HEDMs due to their high nitrogen content resulting the enrichment of high energy bonds such as N-N (160 kJ·mol−1) and N = N (418 kJ·mol−1)11,12. The pioneer research teams such as KlapÖtke’s, Shreeve’s, and many other groups have contributed considerable studies13,14,15,16,17,18,19. The key question in new HEDMs development is the balancing of high-energy and insensitivity. One effective method is increasing oxygen balance properly by introducing oxygen-containing functional groups such as -NO2, -NH-NO2 and -OH. It is important to verify whether the introduction of carbonyl group (-C( = O)-) works well or not.

Therefore, we start from di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methane (4, H2DTMane) to synthesize target compound. The synthesis of H2DTMone was optimized. Then, excess inorganic oxidant potassium permanganate was used to achieve the transformation of methylene (-CH2-) to carbonyl (-C( = O)-) bridging group. The possible mechanism for the autocatalysis oxidation using potassium permanganate was given in Fig. 2 according to relevant literature20. The oxidation process of the methylene group may go through two states including addition of water to -C(OH)H- group and dehydration with MnO3 to -C( = O)-. The insoluble substance was proven to be manganese dioxide hydrate, while the oxidation product potassium di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methanone dihydrate (2, [K(HDTMone)·2H2O]n) was dissolved in the aqueous solution. Therefore, it is convenient to collect compound 2 by evaporation after filtration.

Figure 2
figure2

The supposed mechanism for the autocatalysisoxidation by potassium permanganate.

White powder di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methanone (3, H2DTMone) can be obtained after acidification and filtration of solution of compound 2, since compound 3 hardly dissolves in water at room temperature. The crystalline tetrazyl gem-diol (-C(OH)2-) compound, di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl) methanediol dihydrate (1, H2DTMdiol·2H2O), was grown from the above filtrate in ten days. It is a regular transparent crystal.

Surprisingly, crystal-to-crystal transition occurred from crystal of compound 1 to crystal of compound 3 was firstly observed after heating up to 120 °C as evidenced by X-ray single crystal diffraction and powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD, Figures S11 and S12). Although the transformed crystal is cracked, the much smaller but suitable crystal size of compound 3 could be picked out for X-ray single crystal diffraction measurement. Figure 3 shows the crystal appearances before and after transition, in which (II) was derived from (I). And crystal suitable for X-ray single crystal diffraction measurement could be picked out from (II). (III) and (IV) are electron-microscope photos before and after the transition, for which the smaller size crystals of compound 1 were grown. It can be seen in both electron-microscope photo and optical microscope photo that the crystal of compound 1 is irregularly hexagon block, while the crystal appearance after transition (compound 3) is just irregular block in much smaller size. To our knowledge, this phenomenon is so unusual that rarely reported in literatures.

Figure 3
figure3

(I) and (III) crystal appearance before transition (compound 1); (II) and (IV) crystal appearance after transition (compound 3).

As unstable intermediate compounds, gem-diol compounds are ubiquitous in hydrolysis reactions of aldehydes and ketones. Unfortunately, the structures in which two hydroxyl groups are linked by a carbon atom are generally photolabile and thermolabile. So it is quite challenging for researchers to study their specific characteristics. The stable gem-diol compounds are rarely reported, while that of tetrazyl gem-diol compounds are to our knowledge never reported before. Among these, ninhydrin and chloral hydrate were well-known and fully studied gem-diol compounds. Ninhydrin is generally used as chromogenic agent of amino acids21,22. And chloral hydrate is broad investigated in medical field23,24. However, the phenomenon of crystal-to-crystal transition in this kind of compounds is never reported until this work in the field of germinal diol chemistry. The crystalline compound 1 is dehydrated to compound 3, which still remains perfect crystalline state. Fortunately, we cultured crystals and carried out X-ray single crystal diffraction analysis which unambiguously confirmed the structures and these phenomena substantially.

The structures of compound 1, 2, 3 and 4 were obtained by X-ray single crystal diffraction as shown in Fig. 4 and Table S1. Further information of the crystal-structure determinations have been deposited in the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre as supplementary publication No. 1516736, 1516734, 1439053, 1516733.

Figure 4
figure4

Thermal ellipsoid diagrams of the crystal structures of compound 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Compound 1 crystallizes as a dihydrate in the monoclinic space group C2/c with four molecules in one unit cell. The structure 1 is composed of two tetrazole rings connected with C1-C2-C1′, of which both the two bond lengths are the same as 1.519 Å and the bond angle is 110.4(2)°. The unique bond length of C2-O1 is 1.39 Å. The bond angle of O1-C2-O1′ is 114.2°. The O2-tetrazole1-O1-C2 and O2′-tetrazole2-O1′-C2 fragment are almost planar, respectively. The dihedral angle formed between the planes of the two fragments is 75.14(3)°. The packing structure of compound 1 is shown in Fig. S5and S2. The molecules are connected by H-bonds to 3-D networks, which contributes to its higher dehydration temperature than that of 5-(5-Nitrotetrazol-2-ylmethyl) tetrazole monohydrate reported by Klapötke et al. (99 °C)25. And the latter only have H-bonds along b-axis.

Figure 5
figure5

(a) The packing structure of compound 1; (b) The intermolecular hydrogen-bond networks, dashed lines indicate strong hydrogen bonding; (c) Detail with enlarged scale Hydrogen-bonding interaction of compound 1.

Compound 2 crystallizes in the monoclinic space group P21/m with four molecules in the unit cell. Compound 2 demonstrates coordination structure through the connection of K+ ions with carbonyl groups and water molecules. Each K+ ion is eight coordinated by four water molecules and the N8, N8′, O1, O1′ from two different di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methanone. A two-dimensional network of 2 (Figure S4) is formed by dimeric potassium tetrazolate dihydrate units. Due to its 2-D frameworks stabilizing the structure, compound 2 possesses a decomposition peak temperature of 205.1 °C higher than that of compound 3.

Crystal 3 was obtained by the dehydration of crystal 1, which was confirmed by single X-ray diffraction. Compound 3 crystallizes in triclinic space group P-1. As expected, after the methylene group of 4 was oxidized to carbonyl group, the density has also been significantly improved to 1.734 g·cm−3. The bond length of C2-O1 is 1.21 Å. The carbonyl bridged two tetrazole rings are not in the same plane with a torsion angle of C4-C5-C6 of 118.5(5)°. There are few H-bonds in compound 3, which result in lower decomposition temperature (193.4 °C, Fig. 6). As comparison, the similar compounds di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl) methanone oxime and 5,5′-(hydrazonomethylene)bis(1H-tetrazole) reported by Shreeve et al.26 decompose at 288.7 °C and 247.6 °C respectively, whose structures are stabilized by much more H-bonds among single molecules.

Figure 6
figure6

(a) DSC and TG curves of crystal 1; (b) Detail with enlarged scale of DSC measurement; (c) Molecular structure of compound 3.

Compound 4 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group Pbc2 (1) with the density of 1.675 g·cm−3, which was consistent with the reported information27. The novel compound 1 and 2 can be crystallized from its oxidation reaction mother liquid respectively, both as colorless crystals.

The thermal stabilities of above-mentioned four compounds were determined by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and thermogravimetry (TG) measurements (with a heating rate of 10 °C·min−1). Crystal 4 exhibits a melting point of 143 °C and a decomposition peak temperature of 214 °C. Crystal 2 can be dehydrated after heating upto 90 °C and decomposes rapidly at 191.6 °C with explosion.

The rare gem-diol crystal 1 shows bad thermal stability. As shown in Fig. 6, the first endothermic process happened in the range of 90~107 °C in DSC curve, and with a mass loss of about 16.4% (cal:16.35%) in TG curve corresponding to elimination of two lattice water molecules, immediately followed by 1,2-elimination water reaction from gem-diol group in the 110.1~114.9 °C range (Fig. 6(b)). These two processes are happened almost at the same time based on the sustained mass loss shown on the TG curve.

Astonishingly, the crystal 1 dehydrated and underwent crystal-to-crystal solid transition once heating up to 130 °C as a stable new state. Then, perfect di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methanone (3) translucency crystal was formed. The crystal-to-crystal nature of this transition from 1 to 3 was confirmed firstly by X-ray single crystal diffraction.

Structurally, the existence of the strong electron-withdrawing tetrazole groups contributes a lot to the electrophilic activity of bridged methylene. Besides, we can observe from the DSC and TG curves that the gem-diol compound 1 becomes very unstable once losing crystalline water molecules. For a further understanding of crystal water’s influence on thermal stability of compound 1, we have to study the nature of molecular packing structure (Fig. 5). The H-bonds between di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methanediol with crystal water molecules have very important contribution to the stability of crystal 1.

Additionally, we can see a mushrooming number of hydrogen bonds throughout every unit which forms dense and infinite three-dimensional networks (Fig. 5b). Furthermore, each hydroxyl has a close relation with ubiquitous water molecules through H-bonds (Fig. 5c). The stability is further strengthened by multiple hydrogen bonds involving crystallization water molecules and by stacking interactions between adjacent ties (Figure S1). The results provide a better explanation for the phenomena that water molecules entail large barriers in dehydration decomposition of the gem-diol compound.

Herein we reported a facile green syntheses and characterizations of bis-tetrazole family including compounds 1, 2, 3, 4 as well as a mutual transformation between each other.

Compound 4 was completely converted to energetic salt compound 2 with excess potassium permanganate as oxidant, which represents a green and highly efficient synthetic route of methylene oxidation. Compound 1 and 3 were produced via the acidification of compound 2. The equilibrium distribution between 1 and 3 is connected with the pH of solution. The dehydration becomes barrierless in diluted hydrochloric acid. Noteworthily, compound 3 is a promising energetic compound as raw material of HEDMs. Besides, the stability of gem-diol compound 1 in atmosphere environment attributes to its dual role as either a donor or acceptor with crystal water resulting in the 3D hydrogen bonds nets.

An unprecedented crystal-to-crystal solid phase transition involving 1 and 3 was firstly confirmed. The mechanisms need to be further investigated. And the tetrazyl as electron withdrawing groups crystalline gem-diol (-C(OH)2-) compound, di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methanediol dihydrate (1, H2DTMdiol·2H2O), was obtained for the first time.

This research provides very significant experimental data for the methylene oxidation chemistry and alkanediol chemistry.

Experimental

Typical experiment procedures of the syntheses of compound 1, 2, 3 and 4

Di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methane (4, H2DTMane)

The synthesis of di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl) methane adapted from reference28 and obtained the crystal from isopropanol. IR (cm−1, KBr): 3008(s), 2863(s), 2736(s), 1747(m), 1560(s), 1375(s), 1324(s), 1197(m), 1072(s), 871(s). Elemental analysis (%) for C3H4N8 (152.12): C, 23.69; H, 2.65; N, 73.66; found: C, 23.57; H, 2.59; N, 73.58.

Potassium di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methanone dihydrate (2, [K(HDTMone)·2H2O]n)

A mixture of H2DTMane (50 mmol, 7.6 g) and potassium permanganate (110 mmol, 17.38 g) in water (500 mL) was stirred for 8 h at 80 °C. The mixture was cooled to the room temperature naturally, and colorless solution was collected by filtration. After concentrated the solution in vacuum condition, a water-soluble white powder ([K(HDTMone)·2H2O]n) was obtained, which could be recrystallized from water. IR (cm−1, KBr): 3636(s), 3493(s), 2393(s), 1955(s), 1676(s), 1491(s), 1388(s), 1344(s), 1164(m), 1115(s), 976(w), 923(s), 603(s), 494(w), 430(s). Elemental analysis (%) for C3H5N8O3K (240.25): C, 14.98; H, 2.08; N, 46.62; found: C, 15.13; H, 2.59; N, 46.99.

Di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methanone (3, H2DTMone)

Compound 2 (10 g) was dissolved in 100 mL of water. Under constant stirring, a solution of concentrated HCl in water was added dropwise. An insoluble white powder of which started instantly to precipitate, which was filtered and washed with ethanol to give compound 3. Lastly, the product was dried shortly under high vacuum as white power. (5.491 g, 79%). IR (cm−1, KBr): 3563(s), 3483(s), 2393(s), 1950(s), 1673(s), 1626(w), 1459(s), 1381(m), 1215(m), 1110(m), 1017(w), 907(s), 637(m),431(m). Elemental analysis (%) for C3H2N8O (166.13): C, 21.67; H, 1.20; N, 67.42; found: C, 21.73; H, 1.59; N, 67.69.

Di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methanediol dihydrate(1, H2DTMdiol·2H2O)

Compound 4 was stoichiometrically oxidized by potassium permanganate, and the filtrated reaction solution was acidified by HCl solution to pH = 2. After filtration, acidifying the solution, crystals of the product 1, used for X-ray structure analysis was obtained by culturing the filtrate for 10 days. IR (cm−1, KBr): 3408(s), 3123(s), 2949(s), 2858(s), 2696(s), 2590(s), 2443(s), 1797(m), 1678(m), 1557(s), 1476(s), 1438(m), 1357(s), 1241(s), 1140(s), 1094(s), 1034(m), 1011(m), 907(s), 819(s), 705(w), 564(m). Elemental analysis (%) for C3H8N8O4 (220.17): C, 16.35; H, 3.63; N, 50.87; found: C, 17.13; H, 3.59; N, 50.99.

References

  1. 1.

    Wasserman, H. H. et al. The Chemistry of Vicinal Tricarbonyls. A Stable Vinyl Tricarbonyl Hydrate as a Di- and Trielectrophile. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 111, 371–372 (1989).

  2. 2.

    Bock, H., Dienelt, R., Schodel, H. & Van, T. T. H. Crystal structures of twisted di(2-pyridyl)ketone and planar azo-di(2-pyridine) and their discussion based on PM3 enthalpy hypersurfaces for the isoelectronic molecules. STRUCTURAL CHEMISTRY 9, 279–288 (1998).

  3. 3.

    Aakeroy, C. B., Nieuwenhuyzen, Robinson, M. & Di-hydroxymalonic, P. acid as a building block of hydrogenbonded 3-dimensional architectures. J.Chem.Cryst. 28, 111 (1998).

  4. 4.

    Sommerer, S. O., Westcott, B. L., Friebe, T. L. & Abboud, K. A. DI(2-PYRIDINIO)- METHANEDIOL DINITRATE. ActaCrystallogr. Sect. C: Cryst. Struct. Commun. 50, 2013 (1994).

  5. 5.

    Comba, P. et al. The mechanism of the (bispidine) copper(II)-catalyzed aziridination of styrene: A combined experimental and theoretical study. Chem.-Eur. J. 14, 5313–5328 (2008).

  6. 6.

    Knapp, W. R. & Duca, R. L. La, Di-4-pyridylmethanediol. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E: Struct. Rep. Online 64, o1347 (2008).

  7. 7.

    Loop, I., Skarpos, H., Kalinovich, N., Kazakova, O., Lork, E. & Roschenthaler, G.-V. Facile synthetic pathway to β-hydroxy-β-trifluoromethyl imines and their derivatives. J. Fluorine Chem. 131, 389–395 (2010).

  8. 8.

    Kokil, G. R., Rewatkar, P. V., Gosain, S., Aggarwal, S., Verma, A., Kalra, A. & Thareja, S. Synthesis and In Vitro Evaluation of Novel 1, 2, 4-Triazole Derivatives as Antifungal Agents. Letters in Drug Design & Discovery 7, 46–49 (2011).

  9. 9.

    Snelders, E., Melchers, W. J. & Verweij, P. E. Azole resistance in Aspergillusfumigatus: a new challenge in the management of invasive aspergillosis? Future Microbiology 6, 335 (2011).

  10. 10.

    Zhang, J. P., Zhang, Y. B., Lin, J. B. & Chen, X. M. Metal Azolate Frameworks: From Crystal Engineering to Functional Materials. Chemical Reviews 112, 1001–1033 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Chavez, D. E. & Hiskey, M. A. 1,2,4,5-tetrazine based energetic materials. J. Energ. Mater. 17, 357–377 (1999).

  12. 12.

    Talawar, M. B. et al. Environmentally compatible next generation green energetic materials (GEMs). J. Hazard. Mater. 161, 589–607 (2009).

  13. 13.

    Guo, Y., Gao, H., Twamley, B. & Shreeve, J. M. Energetic nitrogen rich salts of N,N-bis[1(2)H-tetrazol-5-yl]amine. Advanced Materials 19, 2884–2888 (2007).

  14. 14.

    Fischer, D., Klapotke, T. M. & Stierstorfer, J. 1, 5-Di(nitramino)tetrazole: High Sensitivity and Superior Explosive Performance. AngewandteChemie 54, 10299–10302 (2015).

  15. 15.

    Dippold, A. A. & Klapotke, T. M. A study of dinitro-bis-1,2,4-triazole-1,1′-diol and derivatives: design of high-performance insensitive energetic materials by the introduction of N-oxides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 9931–9938 (2013).

  16. 16.

    Freis, M., Klapötke & Thomas, M. Stierstorfer, Jörg, Norbert Szimhardt, Di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)methane as Neutral Ligand in Energetic Transition Metal Complexes. Inorg. Chem. 56, 7936–7947 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Gao, H. & Shreeve, J. M. Azole-Based Energetic Salts. Chemical Reviews 111, 7377–7436 (2011).

  18. 18.

    Zhang, S., Yang, Q., Liu, X., Qu, X., Wei, Q., Xie, G., Chen, S. & Gao, S. High-energy metal–organic frameworks (HE-MOFs): Synthesis, structure and energetic performance. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 307, 292–312 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Feng, Y.-an, Qiu, H., Yang, S.-sha, Du, J. & Zhang, T.-lai Carbonyl-bridged energetic materials: biomimetic synthesis, organic catalytic synthesis, and energetic performances. Dalton Transactions 45, 17117–17122 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Gardner, K. A. & Mayer, J. M. Understanding C-H bond oxidations: H. and H- transfer in the oxidation of toluene by permanganate. Science 269, 1849–1851 (1995).

  21. 21.

    Ruhemann, S. S.: CCXII.—triketohydrindene hydrate. J. Chem. Soc. 97, 2025–2031 (1910).

  22. 22.

    Din, K. U. Micelle Fatma W., Catalysed Reaction of Ninhydrin and DL-Tryptophan. Journal of Surface Science & Technology 18, 129–138 (2002).

  23. 23.

    Grome, J. J. Mcculloch, The effects of chloral hydrate anesthesia on the metabolic response in the substantianigra to apomorphine. J. Brain Research 214, 223–228 (1981).

  24. 24.

    Britton, J. W. & Kosa, S. C. The clinical value of chloral hydrate in the routine electroencephalogram. Epilepsy Research 88, 215–20 (2010).

  25. 25.

    Klapötke, T. M. & Sabate, C. Miro, Rasp, Matthias, Synthesis and properties of 5-nitrotetrazole derivatives as new energetic materials. J. Mater. Chem. 19, 2240–2252 (2009).

  26. 26.

    Chand, D., Parrish, Damon, A., Shreeve & Jean’ne, M. Di(1H-tetrazol-5-yl) methanone oxime and 5,5′-(hydrazonomethylene)bis(1H-tetrazole) and their salts: a family of highly useful new tetrazoles and energetic materials. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 15383–15389 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Diop, C. A. K., Mahon, M. F. & Molloy, K. C. et al. Supramolecular lattices built from di- and tri-tetrazoles: the structures of 1,3,5-tritetrazol-5-ylbenzene bis-dioxane monohydrate and ditetrazol-5-ylmethane. Cryst. Eng. Comm. 4, 462–466 (2002).

  28. 28.

    Feng, Y., Bi, Y. & Zhao, W. et al. Anionic metal–organic frameworks lead the way to eco-friendly high-energy-density materials. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 4, 7596–7600 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the key project (Grant No. ZDKT17–01) of State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology (Beijing Institute of Technology).

Author information

Zhang Bo and Chen Sitong wrote the main manuscript text. Zhang Bo, Chen Sitong and Guo Weiming completed the synthesis of compound 1–4. Zhang Weijing calculated the detonation parameters. Wang Lin contributed to the determination of the single crystals. Yang Li and Zhang Jianguo prepared Figs 4–6. Yang Li has put forward a lot of constructive comment to this work. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Correspondence to Yang Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supporting information

Dataset 2A

Dataset 2B

Dataset 3A

Dataset 3B

Dataset 1A

Dataset 1B

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.