Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 and related members of Lactobacillus. spp reveal adaptations to dairy and gut environments

Abstract

It is important for probiotics that are currently utilized in the dairy industry to have clear genetic backgrounds. In this study, the genetic characteristics of Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 were studied by undertaking a comparative genomics study, and key genes for adaptation to different environments were investigated and validated in vitro. Evidence for horizontal gene transfer resulting in strong self-defense mechanisms was detected in the ZW3 genome. We identified a series of genes relevant for dairy environments and the intestinal tract, particularly for extracellular polysaccharide (EPS) production. Reverse transcription-qPCR (RT-qPCR) revealed significant increases in the relative expression of pgm, ugp, and uge during the mid-logarithmic phase, whereas the expression of pgi was higher at the beginning of the stationary phase. The enzymes encoded by these four genes concertedly regulated carbon flux, which in turn modulated the production of EPS precursors. Moreover, ZW3 tolerated pH 3.5 and 3% bile salt and retained cell surface hydrophobicity and auto-aggregation. In conclusion, we explored the potential of ZW3 for utilization in both the dairy industry and in probiotic applications. Additionally, we elucidated the regulation of the relevant genes involved in EPS production.

Introduction

Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are gram-positive bacteria that naturally occur in the environment and are closely associated with humans, animals and plants. Due to recent advances in LAB research, LAB genotype information in combination with phenotypic characteristics have been applied in the food and medical industries to explore potential biological functions for development and various applications. Genome-wide sequencing has been performed for more than 200 strains of LAB, and many of these strains, such as Lb. acidophilus NCFM1, Lb. plantarum WCFS12, and Lb. rhamnosus GG3, are commonly used in industrial applications and have confirmed probiotic functions. Numerous comparative genomics investigations of Lactobacillus spp. have been conducted. Some of these only targeted a single species in revealing the core and variable genome such as Lb. rhamnosus 4, Lb. sakei 5, and Lb. paracasei 6. Other comparative genomic studies involving various species of Lactobacillus spp. have been conducted to expand their biotechnology potential7,8. LAB genomes are relatively small and have low GC content. Furthermore, common metabolic pathways among strains have been identified; thus, different strains share relatively close evolutionary relationships9. However, due to differences in living conditions, LAB strains have evolved, thereby increasing their genetic diversity10. The correlation between gene loss and niche adaptation was examined by growing nine Lb. casei strains isolated from various sites11. The identification of key genes in the LAB genome that were related to adaptation to the intestinal tract or a milk environment may facilitate the determination of whether a strain has the potential for probiotic or dairy applications in industry.

Lb. kefiranofaciens contributes to kefiran formation and plays a role in a wide range of probiotic functions, such as immunomodulation12, anti-allergic potential13, and modulation of the gut microbiota14. However, studies on this species at the genomic level are limited; for example, one investigation involved screening the biotechnology potential of 213 strains, but less information was provided for this species7.

ZW3 is the first Lb. kefiranofaciens strain that has been completely sequenced. ZW3 was originally isolated from the traditional functional fermentation product kefir and produces high levels of extracellular polysaccharide (EPS)15,16. To obtain current and accurate genetic information about ZW3, its genome was re-annotated, and its genetic characteristics were analyzed in greater detail in this study. Moreover, to explore its relationship with other LAB strains at the genome level, the ZW3 genome was compared with those of five other Lactobacillus strains. Moreover, its potential use as a probiotic or dairy starter strain was examined. Finally, relevant genes for its survival in dairy and intestinal environments were analyzed and verified.

Results and Discussion

General features of the Lb. kefiranofaciens ZW3 genome

The ZW3 genome was re-annotated using the RAST and Basys platforms and verified using the Gene PRIMP system. After manual curation, we obtained credible genome-wide sequence annotation information (Fig. 1). The genomic length of the Lb. kefiranofaciens ZW3 genome was 2,113,023 bp, and the GC content was 37.7%, with 2,181 DNA coding sequences (CDS). In a 2011 study, we only identified 1,908 CDSs in the ZW3 genome15. However, since then, new whole-genome sequences have been uploaded to the database, and thus more information was available for exploration in this study; hence, we carried out the re-annotation. Next, we classified the function of CDSs in the ZW3 genome (Fig. S1). In terms of bacterial cell materials and energy supply, the number of genes involved in protein metabolism and carbohydrate metabolism was the highest (186 and 165, respectively). Moreover, numerous genes (71) were related to cell wall and cell membrane synthesis, of which 16 genes were involved in EPS synthesis and 12 in sialic acid metabolism. Sialic acid is a type of natural sugar-acid compound that commonly occurs in the human intestinal tract16, milk17, and certain viscous environments. Jamila et al.18 first discovered the sialic acid metabolic gene cluster in Lb. sake. The gene cluster is assumed to aid in Lb. adaptation to viscous environments. Therefore, we inferred that genes associated with sialic acid metabolism in ZW3 are important for its survival in kefir, which is a notably viscous environment. The comparison of old and new information about the genes involved in sialic acid and extracellular polysaccharide synthesis is shown in Table S1. We found that the previous annotation data was unclear, such as annotations of the genes WANG_1286, WANG_1287, WANG_1290, WANG_1291, and WANG_1295-WANG_1299. After re-annotation, the accuracy of the annotation data was significantly improved, which may be helpful to future targeted studies. Some genes were not detected in the previous annotation data; for example, two phosphotransferase systems related to sialic acid synthesis were not annotated. Interestingly, the gene encoding α-amylase was detected during re-annotation; it showed 99% sequence similarity to their orthologs in two other Lb. helveticus strains, allowing us to infer that ZW3 may have the ability to utilize starch. Previously, this gene was annotated with the marker “Neopullulanase”, which easily led to its omission from functional screening.

Figure 1
figure1

Circular map of the Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 genome. Genomic features, moving from the periphery to the center of the map: 1. forward CDSs (red); 2. reverse CDSs (blue); 3. rRNA genes (orange); 4. tRNA genes (green); 6. GC% plot; and 7. GC skew.

Whole-genome phylogeny, comparative genomics, average amino acid identity (AAI) analysis, and whole CDS Venn diagrams

A phylogenetic tree containing ZW3 and 74 other Lactobacillus strains, including a Streptococcus infantarius strain, was constructed based on core gene sequences using EDGAR (Fig. S2). In terms of genetic distance, ZW3 was most closely related to the strain Lb. kefiranofaciens DSM5016, followed by Lb. helveticus, Lb. acidophilus, and Lb. amylovorus. From species of Lb. helveticus, we selected three representative strains (R0052, H9, and H10) whose sequence showed good integrity. In addition, we also selected a commercial probiotic strain of Lb. acidophilus La14 (Table 1) for comparative analysis. As expected, the genomes of the H9 and La14 strains were relatively small, and the other four strains were approximately 2–2.25 Mb in size. According to the genomic data Lactobacillus genus, estimated genome sizes ranged from 1.23 Mb (Lb. sanfranciscensis) to 4.91 Mb (Lb. parakefiri)19, and the number of CDSs ranged from approximately 1,700 to 2,80020. Genome size and the number of CDSs in these six strains were all moderate. Moreover, the number of CDSs in ZW3 and DSM5016 were higher than the other strains, indicating more functions.

Table 1 Genome information on various Lactobacillus strains.

In homologous species, amino acid sequences are more strongly conserved than nucleotide sequences21. Here, the AAI was calculated for each strain, and the results are shown as a matrix (Fig. S3). The AAIs for ZW3 and DSM 5016 were the highest (99.72%), which was indicative of their close evolutionary relationship. The AAI of ZW3 and three strains of Lb. helveticus was approximately 87%, indicating large amino acid differences in the core genes among different species. We also conducted ANI analysis (Fig. S4), which validated the AAI findings. We identified the pangenome (a 3,904-gene family) and the core genome (907 genes) of the six strains. Orthologous genes of the core genome were primarily related to DNA and RNA metabolism, carbohydrate metabolism, and cell division processes. These genes are generally essential for the growth and reproduction of organisms and constitute the basic life framework of the six strains, which are relatively conserved in Lactobacillus spp.

Because the genetic distance for La 14 was relatively large, we analyzed the gene distribution of five strains, namely, ZW3, DSM 5016, R0052, H9, and H10, by constructing Venn diagrams (Fig. 2). The highest number of unique genes was observed in R0052 (355), followed by ZW3 (300), indicating that these two strains are more diverse at the genetic level. The unique genes in ZW3 comprised 28 hypothetical protein genes, two transposase genes, mobile element protein genes, polysaccharide synthesis proteins, bile salt hydrolases, restriction endonucleases, and specific anchoring proteins. These genes contribute to specific physiological functions in ZW3. Full chromosome alignments of ZW3 and DSM 5016 were also performed (Fig. 3). Analysis revealed a mosaic pattern of homology that was organized in local collinear blocks (LCBs) in both ZW3 and DSM 5016 (Fig. 3a). Evidently, a significant portion of the genetic information in these strains has been conserved, as the majority of the LCBs were shared by both. Moreover, chromosomal rearrangements apparently occurred rather frequently, as the number of LCBs demonstrating changes in their relative genomic position was high but their lengths were short. Additionally, we detected several inversions in the DSM 5016 genome when ZW3 was used as reference. However, numerous differences between ZW3 and DSM 5016 were also detected (Fig. 3b), which were mainly related to mobile protein sequences. According to the combined annotation results, there were 102 mobile element proteins and 7 transposases in ZW3, but only 34 mobile element proteins and 5 transposases were identified in DSM 5016. A higher number of gene fragments were apparently lost during ZW3 genome evolution. Additionally, higher GC content is a sign of rapid ongoing evolution in this particular species9. The GC content of the ZW3 genome was slightly higher than that of the DSM 5016 genome, which indirectly verified the results previously described.

Figure 2
figure2

Venn diagram of CDS numbers for Lactobacillus spp.

Figure 3
figure3

Alignment of the Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 genome with the Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens DSM 5016 genome (a. whole-sequence alignment; b. partial alignment results).

Genomic islands (GIs), multiple restriction-modification (RM) systems, and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) regions

GIs are sites of horizontal gene transfer (HGT) that reveal important features of plasticity of a bacterial genome and are primarily linked to gene gain processes22. The results obtained with islandViewer are shown in Figure S5. Fourteen GIs were identified in ZW3, and among the six strains, the highest number of GIs was observed in R0052 (29). GI length in ZW3 ranged between 4,344 bp and 31,685 bp, and the total length of all GIs was 151,318 bp, representing 7.16% of the whole genome. However, this value was less than that of DSM 5016 (8.3%), H10 (8.45%), and R0052 (15.79%). Furthermore, GI 7 in ZW3 showed 99% identity to the GIs in DSM 5016 as well as 97% consistency with GI 5 of H9. Moreover, the sequences of H9 and H10 showed 98% similarity to GI 8 in ZW3. GI 12 in ZW3 was 89% identical to GI 1 in the La 14 genome. These findings indicate a high degree of sequence conservation among GIs in Lactobacillus spp.

The RM system is a self-defense mechanism that is prevalent in bacteria that prevents and controls phage infections. Variations in the number and type of RM systems between commensal and dairy LABs have been reported23. Genes of the type III RM system may constitute a signature for milk adaptation9. A type III restriction endonuclease system in ZW3 (also in DSM5016), as well as type I (3), type II (3), and type IV (1) RM systems were identified. The number of RM systems was higher than that observed in R0052, H9, H10, and La 14, whereas DSM 5016 showed an additional type I RM system than that detected in ZW3. Phage infections are highly probable during traditional kefir milk fermentation due to the use of unsterilized raw milk and the open environment during the inoculation process. This situation may promote the selection of phage-resistant strains, which would explain why the RM system in ZW3 was more diversified. Another mechanism of phage resistance, CRISPR, was also detected in the six strains. According to a previous study24, the CRISPR-Cas and RM systems are compatible, cleave invading DNA, and provide bacteria with increased phage resistance. The CRISPR-Cas system is capable of cleaving phage DNA that was previously methylated by the RM system. ZW3 harbored two unique CRISPR loci, each with 4 and 3 spacers, which is fewer than in the other strains. Hence, the RM system may play more important roles than CRISPR-Cas in strain ZW3.

Growth-related genes in milk or dairy products

Some LABs secrete bacteriocin or antimicrobial peptides such as nisin, which has been widely used as a food preservative, to resist adverse environmental impacts. Helveticin J bacteriocin in ZW3 showed 100% sequence similarity with DSM 5016. However, helveticin J was also found in three other strains of Lb. helveticus. Helveticin J reportedly belongs to the class III bacteriocins, which have a narrow antibacterial spectrum and low thermal stability25. To investigate whether the Helveticin J in ZW3 is inhibitory or sterilizing to common pathogens, we employed a number of common pathogens as indicator bacteria, including E. coli, E. aerogenes, M. luteus, and B. subtilis. After adjusting the pH to neutral and removing hydrogen peroxide, the ZW3 fermentation supernatants did not demonstrate inhibitory functions against the indicator bacteria, corroborating the results of a previous study25. To adapt to growth in milk, LAB effectively uses lactose or galactose as carbon source and hydrolyzes casein and whey protein to promote growth and metabolism and to provide the necessary raw materials and energy substrates. All six strains contained enzymes that were related to lactose and galactose supersession with multiple copies to permit full nutrient use in a dairy environment (Table S4). Interestingly, we only found oligofructose and raffinose metabolic systems in La 14, DSM 5016, and ZW3. Fructooligosaccharides are probiotics that stimulate the growth and activity of Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. in the intestine26. Therefore, we inferred similarity between DSM 5016 and ZW3 as well as La 14, as these strains are capable of adapting to dairy and animal or human intestinal environments. In another study, we demonstrated colonization by ZW3 in the mouse gut (data unpublished). In terms of protein hydrolysis systems, all six strains had similar proteases and aminopeptidases, but the ZW3 and DSM strains lacked a deblocking aminopeptidase, which was present in the other strains. Cheese made with Lb. helveticus, in which deblocking aminopeptides were knocked out, tastes bitter and is harder than cheese made with wild-type bacteria27. Similarly, we found that mozzarella made using ZW3 was much harder than that made with commercial strains (data unpublished).

Genes involved in survival in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT)

The GITs of animals and humans contain bile, and the bile concentration in the human GIT is between 0.1% and 0.5%, depending on individual differences28,29. Most probiotics survive in the bile environment because these express bile salt hydrolase (BSH), which hydrolyzes amide bonds between amino acid groups and cholesterol30. We detected two bsh genes (peg.857 and peg.858) and two bile salt transporters (peg.859 and peg.860) in the ZW3 genome. Using BLASTP, we determined the similarity of peg.857 to the bsh gene in Lb. johnsonii to be 96%. Moreover, the similarity of peg.858 to another bsh gene in Lb. johnsonii was 86% and was 85% for Lb. gasseri ATCC 332333, which demonstrates excellent tolerance to 0.25% bile31. Both peg.859 and peg.860 belonged to the co-transporter superfamily but were quite different from the other species of the Lactobacillus genus. Under acid stress, H+ -ATPase32, the urease system33, and amino acid decarboxylation34 act as the main regulatory mechanisms that maintain the internal pH of cells within physiological limits. A pH homeostasis is maintained by discharging H+ from cells, which is dependent on H+ -ATPase35. To inspect the acid tolerance of ZW3, the H+ -ATPase (peg.510) gene was detected, which showed 90% homology to the gene in Lb. crispatus. Decarboxylation systems consist of a decarboxylase and a precursor/product transmembrane exchanger36. Decarboxylase enzymes function in cooperation with an amino acid/amine antiporter system, which moves amines out of the cell in exchange for extracellular amino acids. The massive extrusion of the basic amine product coupled by the uptake of the amino acid substrate may also contribute to an increase in the pH of the extracellular medium37,38. We also identified two other genes involved in amino acid decarboxylation in ZW3, namely, ornithine decarboxylase (peg.773) and amino acid permease (peg.774), which were also highly homologous (82% and 95%, respectively) to the gene in Lb. acidophilus, which is involved in acid tolerance39. Therefore, we inferred a similar function in terms of acid tolerance in ZW3. To further understand acid and salt tolerance in ZW3, we conducted in vitro experiments. ZW3 demonstrated a certain degree of tolerance at pH 3.5, but did not survive in 0.3% bile salt; however, this strain was resistant to a high bile salt concentration (3%). According to previous reports, Lb. gasseri has lower bile salt tolerance under acidic conditions than under neutral conditions31. Thus, we suspect that high bile salt concentrations neutralized the pH of the medium, thereby allowing ZW3 to exhibit bile salt tolerance.

Surface protein adhesion plays a key role in the successful colonization of probiotics in the GIT. ZW3 produces high amounts of EPS40, which influences bacterial adhesion and survival41,42. In our preliminary study, the yield and composition of EPS significantly differed under various medium conditions (data unpublished). Therefore, we investigated the growth curve and EPS-producing curve of ZW3 under two different culture conditions (in whey medium and modified MRS medium; Fig. 4). The logarithmic growth phase of ZW3 was relatively short in whey medium (from 8 h to 48 h; Fig. 4a), and the final OD600 = 0.7. However, a longer logarithmic period was observed in the modified MRS culture (from 8 h to 72 h), and the final OD600 = 1.0 (Fig. 4b). Whey medium contains 1.3 g/L of polysaccharides at 0 h (starch derived from milk powder). Because ZW3 itself has α- amylase, it can hydrolyze starch; therefore, from 0 h to 8 h, ZW3 mainly consumed starch. In terms of EPS yield, the amount of EPS significantly increased from 16 h to 32 h in whey medium and then decreased, indicating that EPS accumulation was at its peak (1.29 g/L–1.93 g/L) at 32 h when ZW3 was cultured in whey medium. In modified MRS medium, EPS produced by ZW3 accumulated as biomass increased until 40 h, reaching a peak value of 2.03 g/L and then decreasing. These growth and EPS-producing curves indicate that ZW3 exhibits low EPS production during the early logarithmic phase (ELP), whereas highest levels of accumulation occur during the mid-logarithmic phase (MLP) in both media. However, the amount of EPS was significantly reduced at the beginning of the stationary phase (BSP).

Figure 4
figure4

Growth and EPS production curves for Lb. kefiranofaciens ZW3 (a: Whey medium; b: modified MRS medium).

We previously confirmed that the medium exerts a significant effect on ZW3 growth status and EPS production, although ZW3 demonstrated the same trend for EPS production at different growth phases. Different components of the medium affect the activity of related enzymes in the EPS synthesis pathway such as that in Lb. bulgaricus NCFB277243. Thus, the differences in enzyme expression levels in EPS synthesis-related metabolic pathways in various media are confusing. Moreover, it is not clear whether the expression of specific enzymes is up- or downregulated. Therefore, we conducted an analysis of these relevant enzymes. We investigated metabolic pathways in ZW3 using the KEGG database (Fig. 5) by exploring the Leloir pathway44,45, which is related to EPS production in LAB. The number of monosaccharide nucleotides impacts the composition and yield of EPS46,47. The monosaccharide composition of EPS in ZW3 consists of mannose, galactose, and glucose. Five enzymes were associated with UDP-glucose, UDP-galactose, and GDP-mannose in the ZW3 genome, including glucose-6-phosphate isomerase (pgi), α-phosphoglucose mutase (pgm), UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (ugp), UDP-galactose 4-epimerase (uge), and mannose-6-phosphate isomerase (mpi). However, no enzymes that convert 6-phosphate mannose to GDP-mannose in the GDP-mannose synthesis pathway were detected in ZW3. A previous report similarly indicated the lack of a corresponding enzyme system in Lb. paracasei LC2W, suggesting that the mannose component of its EPS may be derived from the medium, mannose-6-phosphate, or epoxidose48. Thus, we only investigated the catalytic fructose-6-phosphate to mannose-6-phosphate step mediated by mpi.

Figure 5
figure5

The proposed biosynthesis pathway for EPS production according to KEGG analysis.

Next, we detected differences in the expression of the five enzymes mentioned above in two different media at three growth phases. A whey medium cultured group was used as control (Fig. 6). For the same growth phase, relative gene expression significantly differed (Fig. 6a). The highest relative expression during the three growth phases was observed for pgm, and the lowest expression was observed for mpi, indicating that pgm is more positively regulated than mpi in modified MRS. pgm expression levels during the logarithmic phase were 98.6% of the total expression. Compared to the relative pgm expression levels in ELP and BSP, pgm demonstrated significant positive regulation in MLP (Fig. 6d). Pgm has a significant impact on EPS synthesis, and increasing pgm activity significantly increases EPS production49,50. Pgm catalyzes the conversion of glucose-6-phosphate to glucose-1-phosphate, thereby directing carbon flux to the UDP-glucose synthetic pathway. Therefore, we hypothesized the role of pgm to be that of a “switch” during MLP in modified MRS medium, thereby contributing to EPS accumulation. Interestingly, pgi differs from pgm, ugp, and uge by showing its highest relative expression during BSP (up to 87% of the total relative expression), as shown in Fig. 6c. Analysis of the active site and conserved domains indicated that pgi consists of SIS1 and SIS2 and is relatively conserved. Glucose-6-phosphate was converted to fructose-6-phosphate by pgi and then entered glycolysis. Thus, carbon flux was dominated by pgi, which primarily flows to the glycolytic pathway, during BSP. This has been verified in Lactobacillus casei 51 in NADH oxidase overexpression strains, which exhibited reduced lactate and improved EPS production. Thus, our results suggest that the decline in EPS production during BSP was related to the flow of carbon to the glycolytic pathway.

Figure 6
figure6

The relative expression levels of each gene at different time points (a: the relative expression of one gene at different time points; b: the relative expression of different genes at one time point; c: the relative expression of pgi; d: the relative expression of pgm; e: the relative expression of ugp; f: the relative expression of uge; g: the relative expression of mpi). Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (S.D.) (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 compared to another time point.

Total relative gene expression was highest during MLP (Fig. 6b). Furthermore, the change in the relative expression of ugp was very similar to that observed for pgm, which significantly improved during MLP compared to the other two phases (Fig. 6e). PHYRE2 analysis indicated that the UGP of ZW3 was composed of 299 amino acids that belonged to a hydrophilic protein that contained an ADP-binding site, an ATP-binding site, and four glucose-1-phosphate sites. ugp affects EPS synthesis in both fungi52 and bacteria53. UGP catalyzes the synthesis of UDP-glucose by glucose-1-phosphate and UTP molecules, which is the next step in the catalytic reaction performed by pgm, directly providing precursors for EPS production. Uge catalyzes the conversion of UDP-glucose to UDP-galactose, which is the source of galactose for EPS, in this metabolic pathway. UGE of ZW3 was folded into two different domains containing four active sites, multiple NAD+ binding sites, substrate binding sites, and homodimer binding sites. After knocking out uge, mutant growth was affected54, and EPS production was reduced55, with no EPS-induced changes in morphology56. Here, we tested uge expression levels during MLP, which were significantly higher than in BSP (Fig. 6f), indicating the important role of uge in EPS production. Additionally, mpi in modified MRS medium demonstrated negative regulation, and no significant differences between MLP and BSP were observed (Fig. 6g). Thus, we eliminated the possibility that mannose in EPS was derived from mannose-6-phosphate.

We next investigated cell aggregation and hydrophobicity (Table 2). ZW3 demonstrated cell aggregation and hydrophobicity but at lower levels than those observed in Lb. kefiranofaciens XL10. In most bacteria, the S-layer is a mesoporous surface structure composed of monomolecular protein subunits such as fibrin, fibronectin, or other collagen that adhere to the extracellular matrix57,58. We found four S-layer proteins in the ZW3 genome, namely, peg.509, peg.1216, peg.1307, and peg.2072. S-layer proteins have been identified in various LABs such as Lb. acidophilus, Lb. helveticus, Lb. buchneri, and Lb. brevis, with usually one or more coding genes. The larger number of S-layer proteins observed in ZW3 suggests that this strain may have more opportunity for adhesion in the GIT. Mucin-binding proteins influence colonization, and strains containing this gene specifically bind to intestinal epithelial cells and are successfully retained in the GIT. Two mucin-binding protein genes (peg.190 and peg.836) were also found in the ZW3 genome. Thus, ZW3 may specifically anchor to loci on the surface of intestinal epithelial cells.

Table 2 Cell surface hydrophobicity and aggregation of the investigated strains.

In summary, we re-annotated the sequence of Lb. kefiranofaciens ZW3 to obtain more comprehensive genome-wide information. Comparative genomic analysis of this genome was performed using other available Lactobacillus spp. genomes, and AAI analysis, ANI analysis, and phylogenetic construction indicated that strain DSM5016 was most closely related to ZW3. Moreover, we detected the pangenome and core genome of the strains, as well as unique genes in ZW3. Whole sequence alignment and GI analysis indicated that ZW3 evolution is driven by gene loss and gene gain as well as selective pressure on the genome. Strong self-defense mechanisms associated with survival in the GIT and dairy environments were observed in the ZW3 genome and those of other investigated strains. In terms of EPS production, four genes (pgm, ugp, uge, and pgi) were determined to encode the enzymes that regulate carbon flux through the EPS synthetic pathway, which in turn affects EPS yield. In this study, the basic genetic information and genetic relationships of ZW3 with other LAB strains were investigated, laying a theoretical foundation for future studies examining the functional properties of other LAB strains. In vitro and in vivo experiments may confirm additional functional properties of the ZW3 strain for use in the food or pharmaceutical industries.

Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

The strains used in this study are listed in Table S2. Lb. kefiranofaciens ZW3 was grown anaerobically at 30 °C in modified MRS broth or whey medium for 24 h. Other strains were incubated in LB medium at 37 °C with shaking at 200 rpm for 16 h.

Re-annotation of the genome of Lb. kefiranofaciens ZW3

The genome was annotated using the RAST59 (http://rast.nmpdr.org/) and Basys60 (https://www.basys.ca/) pipelines. Predictions produced by the two pipelines were compiled into a single annotation file after manual curation in the Mauve61 software environment. Final corrections and quality assessment of the annotation were performed with the GenePRIMP pipeline62. GenePRIMP was also used to identify putative pseudogenes. A circular map of the Lb. kefiranofaciens ZW3 genome was generated using Artemis and DNAPlotter software63.

Comparative genomics of Lb. kefiranofaciens ZW3

The complete genome sequence of Lb. kefiranofaciens ZW3 was compared with those of Lb. kefiranofaciens DSM5016, Lb. helveticus H9, Lb. helveticus H10, Lb. helveticus R0052, and Lb. acidophilus La14 using a variety of tools. Genome sequences of the six strains were retrieved from GenBank (Table S3). To visualize conserved genomic regions or chromosomal rearrangements, whole-genome sequence alignments were performed via progressive MAUVE64. Estimation of the differential gene content of the genomes, as well as the whole-genome phylogeny of Lactobacillus, was conducted within the EDGAR software framework65. Venn diagrams, AAI and ANI were also designed using the EDGAR software framework.

Other bioinformatics tools

Sequence similarity searches were performed with the BLAST suite. Whenever necessary, protein sequences were analyzed in the CDD66. CRISPRs were analyzed using the tools available in the CRISPRcompare web-service67. Similarity analysis of CRISPR spacers was undertaken using BLASTN. GIs were identified and visualized using the IslandViewer application, which utilizes three different prediction tools (IslandPick, SIGI-HMM, and IslandPath-DIMOB) relying on either sequence composition or comparative genomics68. Genomic regions of RM systems were determined in the REBASE genomes database69. The metabolic map of Lb. kefiranofaciens ZW3 was analyzed using the KEGG database. Other physical properties and structural analysis were conducted using the following online analysis software: physical properties analysis (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/), TMHMM 2.0 server for the analysis of transmembrane structure (http://www.cbs.dtu.Dk/services/TMHMM/), and secondary structure and tertiary structure analysis using PHYRE270.

Antibacterial peptide test

ZW3 was activated via inoculation into 100 mL of modified MRS medium at 4% (v/v). Three parallel lines were set. After 3 h, 3 mL of fresh culture was collected every 3 h through 36 h, then centrifuged at 8,000 g for 10 min. The pH values of the supernatants were adjusted to neutral, and excess catalase was added to the reaction for 2 h per mL at 37 °C to remove hydrogen peroxide. E. coli 442, E. aerogenes 435, M. luteus 444, B. subtilis 438, S. enteritidis 440, and S. mutans 377 were cultured overnight in LB medium, and a layer of solid LB medium was poured into the plates. After cooling and solidifying, 150-µL culture aliquots of indicator bacteria were spread on the plates. After the liquid had completely absorbed, sterile Oxford cups were placed on the plates, and a second layer of solid LB medium was poured, cooled, and solidified. After removal of the Oxford cups, 80 µL of treated supernatant and untreated supernatant were injected and incubated overnight at 37 °C to observe the formation of inhibition zones. Hydrogen peroxide was used as positive control.

Acid and bile salt tolerances

Acid and bile salt tolerance were tested as previously described14, with modifications.

Cell surface hydrophobicity and cell aggregation

Cell surface hydrophobicity was determined using the method of Rosenberg et al.71. Cell aggregation was tested as follows: fresh bacterial cultures in MRS broth at 30 °C were harvested, and cell pellets were washed twice with PBS and resuspended to similar adjusted cell densities (2 × 108 CFU/mL). The suspensions were centrifuged (10,000 g, 5 min), and the pellets were resuspended in a volume of broth equal to the amount removed in the previous step. The mixtures were allowed to stand at 30 °C for 2 h. Subsequently, 1 mL of the upper suspension was assayed to measure the absorbance at wavelength of 600 nm, using broth as reference. Cellular auto-aggregation (%) was calculated as the percentage difference between the initial and final absorbance.

Growth and EPS production curves

Seed broth was inoculated into 400 mL of basal medium at 4% (v/v). Three parallel cultures were grown at 30 °C anaerobically. Fresh samples were taken from the cultures every 8 h, and OD600 values were determined. The average value and standard deviation were calculated in Excel. Then, the supernatants were centrifuged at 6,000 g for 10 min, and the total sugar contents in the supernatants were determined using the phenol-sulfuric acid method. Reducing sugar contents in the supernatants were determined by performing 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid (DNS) assays. EPS content in the fermentation broth was calculated as total sugar content minus reducing sugar content at each time point. Average values and standard deviations were calculated in Excel. With the fermentation time (0–88 h) as the abscissa and EPS yield and OD600 as the double vertical coordinates, growth and EPS production curves of ZW3 in modified MRS liquid medium or whey liquid medium were generated.

Primer design and RT-qPCR of EPS production-related genes in metabolic pathways

ZW3 was cultured in modified MRS liquid medium or whey liquid medium. Cells were collected at different time points (initial logarithmic phase, mid-logarithmic phase, and stationary phase) for RNA extraction. Total RNA was prepared from cultured cells. The quantity and integrity of the purified RNA were checked by measuring the UV absorbance at wavelengths of 260 nm and 280 nm using a BioDrop-Touch device (BioDrop, Ltd., England) and by performing electrophoretic analysis, respectively. RT-PCR was conducted to determine gene expression. The RT reaction mixture (20 μL) contained 7 μL of RNA (50 pg–5 μg), 4 μL of dNTP mix (2.5 mM each), 2 μL of primer mix, 4 μL of 5× RT buffer, 2 μL of dithiothreitol (DTT) (0.1 M), and 1 μL of HiFiScript (200 U/μL) and was incubated at 42 °C for 50 min. RT products were used for PCR amplification or kept at −20 °C for RT-qPCR.

RT-PCR primers based on the five EPS production-related gene sequences of ZW3 and the 16 S rRNA sequence were designed with OligoPerfect™ Designer (http://tools.invitrogen.com/content.cfm?pageid=9716); the primers used in this study are listed in supplementary Table S3. For each primer pair, the PCR efficiency was evaluated by performing serial dilutions using a cDNA sample. The formation of primer dimers and the amplification specificity were assessed by performing melting curve analyses. The expression of various genes was analyzed using RT-qPCR with a 96-well thermocycler (C1000 TouchTM Thermal Cycler, CFX96TM Real-Time System, Bio-Rad, CA, USA) with Bio-Rad CFX Manager 3.0 system software and the following conditions: 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 39 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, a different annealing temperature for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. PCR cycling was followed by melting curve analysis from 65 °C–95 °C (temperature transition rate of 0.5 °C/s) with stepwise fluorescence acquisition. The standard curve method was used in the calculations. Subsequently, the target amount was divided by the amount of 16 S rRNA to obtain a normalized target value. One of the normalized target values in the whey medium conditions was set as one. Then, each of the target values was expressed as the n-fold difference relative to the experimental control.

References

  1. 1.

    Altermann, E. et al. Complete genome sequence of the probiotic lactic acid bacterium Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 3906–3912 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Kleerebezem, M. et al. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 1990–1995 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Sybesma, W., Molenaar, D., van Ijcken, W., Venema, K. & Kort, R. Genome instability in Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Appl Environ Microbiol 79, 2233–2239 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Douillard, F. P., Ribbera, A. & Kant, R. et al. Comparative Genomic and Functional Analysis of 100 Lactobacillus rhamnosus Strains and Their Comparison with Strain GG. Plos Genetics 9, e1003683 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Nyquist, O. L., Mcleod, A. & Brede, D. A. et al. Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus sakei with emphasis on strains from meat. Mol Genet Genomics 285, 297–311 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Smokvina, T., Wels, M. & Polka, J. et al. Lactobacillus paracasei comparative genomics: towards species pan-genome definition and exploitation of diversity. Plos One 8, e68731 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sun, Z., Harris, H. M. B. & Mccann, A. et al. Expanding the biotechnology potential of lactobacilli through comparative genomics of 213 strains and associated genera. Nat Commun 6, 8322 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Kant, R., Blom, J. & Palva, A. et al. Comparative genomics of Lacobacillus. Microb Biotechnol 4, 323–332 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    O’Sullivan, O. et al. Comparative genomics of lactic acid bacteria reveals a niche-specific gene set. BMC Microbiol 9 (2009).

  10. 10.

    Stefanovic, E., Fitzgerald, G. & Mcauliffe, O. Advances in the genomics and metabolomics of dairy lactobacilli: A review. Food Microbiol 61, 33 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Broadbent, J. R., Neeno-Eckwall, E. C. & Stahl, B. et al. Analysis of the Lactobacillus casei supragenome and its influence in species evolution and lifestyle adaptation. BMC Genomics 13, 533 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hong, W. S., Chen, Y. P. & Chen, M.-J. The Antiallergic Effect of Kefir Lactobacilli. J.Food Sci. 75, H244–H253 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hong, W. S., Chen, Y. P., Dai, T. Y., Huang, I. N. & Chen, M. J. Effect of Heat-Inactivated Kefir-Isolated Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens M1 on Preventing an Allergic Airway Response in Mice. J. Agric. Food Chem. 59, 9022–9031 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Xing, Z., Tang, W., Geng, W., Zheng, Y. & Wang, Y. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the probiotic attributes of Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens XL10 isolated from Tibetan kefir grain. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 101, 2467–2477 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Wang, Y., Wang, J., Ahmed, Z., Bai, X. & Wang, J. Complete Genome Sequence of Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3. J Bacteriol 193, 4280–4281 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wang, Y., Ahmed, Z., Feng, W., Li, C. & Song, S. Physicochemical properties of exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 isolated from Tibet kefir. Int J Biol Macromol 43, 283–288 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Podolsky, D. K. Oligosaccharide structures of human colonic mucin. J Biol Chem 260, 8262–8271 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Wang, B. & Brand-Miller, J. The role and potential of sialic acid in human nutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 1351–1369 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Anba-Mondoloni, J., Chaillou, S., Zagorec, M. & Champomier-Verges, M.-C. Catabolism of N-Acetylneuraminic Acid, a Fitness Function of the Food-Borne Lactic Acid Bacterium Lactobacillus sakei, Involves Two Newly Characterized Proteins. Appl Environ Microbiol 79, 2012–2018 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Makarova, K. et al. Comparative genomics of the lactic acid bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103, 15611–15616 (2006).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Konstantinidis, K. T. & Tiedje, J. M. Towards a genome-based taxonomy for prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 187, 6258–6264 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Papadimitriou, K. et al. Comparative genomics of the dairy isolate Streptococcus macedonicus ACA-DC 198 against related members of the Streptococcus bovis/Streptococcus equinus complex. BMC Genomics 15, 272 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Briggiler, M. M., Moineau, S. & Quiberoni, A. Bacteriophages and dairy fermentations. Bacteriophage 2, 149–158 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Dupuis, M. È., Villion, M. & Magadán, A. H. et al. CRISPR-Cas and restriction-modification systems are compatible and increase phage resistance. Nature Communications 4, 2087 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Joerger, M. C. & Klaenhammer, T. R. Cloning, expression, and nucleotide sequence of the Lactobacillus helveticus 481 gene encoding the bacteriocin helveticin. J. J Bacteriol 172, 6339–6347 (1990).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Goh, Y. J. et al. Identification of a putative operon involved in fructooligosaccharide utilization by Lactobacillus paracasei. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 7518–7530 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Prost, F. & Chamba, J. F. Effect of Aminopeptidase Activity of Thermophilic Lactobacilli on Emmental Cheese Characteristics. J Dairy Sci 77, 24–33 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Dunne, C. et al. In vitro selection criteria for probiotic bacteria of human origin: correlation with in vivo findings. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 73, 386S–392S (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mathara, J. M. et al. Functional characteristics of Lactobacillus spp. from traditional Maasai fermented milk products in Kenya. Int J Food Microbiol 126, 57–64 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Begley, M., Hill, C. & Gahan, C. G. M. Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Appl Environ Microbiol 72, 1729–1738 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Azcarate-Peril, M. A. et al. Analysis of the genome sequence of Lactobacillus gasseri ATCC 33323 reveals the molecular basis of an autochthonous intestinal organism. Appl Environ Microbiol 74, 4610–4625 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Booth, I. R. Regulation of cytoplasmic pH in bacteria. Microbiological Reviews 49, 359 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Scott, D. R., Marcus, E. A. & Weeks, D. L. et al. Mechanisms of acid resistance due to the urease system of Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology 123, 187 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Cid, S. B., Miguélez-Arrizado, M. J. & Becker, B. et al. Amino acid decarboxylation by Lactobacillus curvatus CTC273 affected by the pH and glucose availability. Food Microbiol 25, 269–77 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wang, X., Ren, H. & Liu, D. et al. H+‐ATPase‐Defective Variants of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus Contribute to Inhibition of Postacidification of Yogurt during Chilled Storage. J Food Sci 78, M297–M302 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Poolman, B. Precursor/product antiport in bacteria. Mol. Microbiol 4, 1629–1636 (1990).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Molenaar, D., Bosscher, J. S. & Brink, B. T. et al. Generation of a proton motive force by histidine decarboxylation and electrogenic histidine/histamine antiport in Lactobacillus buchneri. J. Bacteriol 175, 2864–2870 (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Bearson, S., Bearson., B. & Foster, J. Acid stress responses in enterobacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett 147, 173–180 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Azcarate-Peril, M. A., Altermann, E., Hoover-Fitzula, R. L., Cano, R. J. & Klaenhammer, T. R. Identification and inactivation of genetic loci involved with Lactobacillus acidophilus acid tolerance. Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 5315–5322 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Ahmed, Z., Wang, Y., Anjum, N., Ahmad, A. & Khan, S. T. Characterization of exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 isolated from Tibet kefir-Part II. Food Hydrocolloids 30, 343–350 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lebeer, S. et al. Identification of a Gene Cluster for the Biosynthesis of a Long, Galactose-Rich Exopolysaccharide in Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Functional Analysis of the Priming Glycosyltransferase. Appl Environ Microbiol 75, 3554–3563 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Walter, J., Schwab, C., Loach, D. M., Ganzle, M. G. & Tannock, G. W. Glucosyltransferase A (GtfA) and inulosucrase (Inu) of Lactobacillus reuteri TMW1.106 contribute to cell aggregation, in vitro biofilm formation, and colonization of the mouse gastrointestinal tract. Microbiology-Sgm 154, 72–80 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Grobben, G. J., Smith, M. R., Sikkema, J. & de Bont, J. A. M. Influence of fructose and glucose on the production of exopolysaccharides and the activities of enzymes involved in the sugar metabolism and the synthesis of sugar nucleotides in Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus NCFB 2772. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 46, 279–284 (1996).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Welman, A. D. & Maddox, I. S. Exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria: perspectives and challenges. Trends Biotechnol 21, 269–274 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Schmid, J., Sieber, V. & Rehm, B. C. Bacterial exopolysaccharides: biosynthesis pathways and engineering strategies. Front Microbiol 6, 496 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Escalante, A., Villegas, J., Wacher, C., Garcia-Garibay, M. & Farres, A. C. Ps Activity of the enzymes involved in the synthesis of exopolysaccharide precursors in an overproducing mutant ropy strain of Streptococcus thermophilus. FEMS Microbiol Lett 209, 289–293 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Barreto, M., Jedlicki, E. & Holmes, D. S. Identification of a gene cluster for the formation of extracellular polysaccharide precursors in the chemolithoautotroph Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 2902–2909 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Xu, N., Liu, J., Ai, L. & Liu, L. Reconstruction and analysis of the genome-scale metabolic model of Lactobacillus casei LC2W. Gene 554, 140–147 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Degeest, B. & De Vuyst, L. Correlation of Activities of the Enzymes α-Phosphoglucomutase, UDP-Galactose 4-Epimerase, and UDP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase with Exopolysaccharide Biosynthesis by Streptococcus thermophilus LY03. Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 3519–3527 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Svensson, M., Waak, E., Svensson, U. & Radstrom, P. Metabolically improved exopolysaccharide production by Streptococcus thermophilus and its influence on the rheological properties of fermented milk. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 6398–6400 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Li, N. et al. Improvement of exopolysaccharide production in Lactobacillus casei LC2W by overexpression of NADH oxidase gene. Microbiol Res 171, 73–77 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Li, M. et al. UDP-glucose pyrophosphorylase influences polysaccharide synthesis, cell wall components, and hyphal branching in Ganoderma lucidum via regulation of the balance between glucose-1-phosphate and UDP-glucose. Fungal Genet Biol 82, 251–263 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Vlamakis, H., Chai, Y., Beauregard, P., Losick, R. & Kolter, R. Sticking together: building a biofilm the Bacillus subtilis way. Nat Rev Microbiol 11, 157–168 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Boels, I. C., van Kranenburg, R., Hugenholtz, J., Kleerebezem, M. & de Vos, W. M. Sugar catabolism and its impact on the biosynthesis and engineering of exopolysaccharide production in lactic acid bacteria. Int Dairy J 11, 723–732 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Mozzi, F., de Giori, G. S. & de Valdez, G. F. UDP-galactose 4-epimerase: a key enzyme in exopolysaccharide formation by Lactobacillus casei CRL 87 in controlled pH batch cultures. J Appl Microbiol 94, 175–183 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Boels, I. C., Ramos, A., Kleerebezem, M. & De Vos, W. M. Functional analysis of the Lactococcus lactis galU and galE genes and their impact on sugar nucleotide and exopolysaccharide biosynthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 67, 3033–3040 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Sleytr, U. B. Regular arrays of macromolecules on bacterial cell walls: structure, chemistry, assembly, and function. Int Rev Cytol 53, 1–62 (1978).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Baumeister, W., Wildhaber, I. & Phipps, B. M. Principles of organization in eubacterial and archaebacterial surface proteins. Can J Microbiol 35, 215–227 (1989).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Overbeek, R. et al. The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of microbial genomes using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res 42, D206–D214 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Van Domselaar, G. H. et al. BASys: a web server for automated bacterial genome annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 33, W455–W459 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Darling, A. C. E., Mau, B., Blattner, F. R. & Perna, N. T. Mauve: Multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 14, 1394–1403 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Pati, A. et al. GenePRIMP: a gene prediction improvement pipeline for prokaryotic genomes. Nat Methods 7, 455–U462 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Carver, T., Thomson, N., Bleasby, A., Berriman, M. & Parkhill, J. DNAPlotter: circular and linear interactive genome visualization. Bioinformatics 25, 119–120 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Darling, A. E., Mau, B. & Perna, N. T. C. e. progressiveMauve: Multiple Genome Alignment with Gene Gain, Loss and Rearrangement. PLoS One 5, e11147 (2010).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Blom, J. et al. EDGAR: A software framework for the comparative analysis of prokaryotic genomes. BMC Bioinformatics 10, 154 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Marchler-Bauer, A. et al. CDD: conserved domains and protein three-dimensional structure. Nucleic Acids Res 41, D348–352 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Grissa, I., Vergnaud, G. & Pourcel, C. CRISPRcompar: a website to compare clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. Nucleic Acids Res 36, W145–W148 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Dhillon, B. K. et al. IslandViewer 3: more flexible, interactive genomic island discovery, visualization and analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 43, W104–W108 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Roberts, R. J., Vincze, T., Posfai, J. & Macelis, D. REBASE-a database for DNA restriction and modification: enzymes, genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 43, D298–D299 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Kelley, L. A., Mezulis, S., Yates, C. M., Wass, M. N. & Sternberg, M. J. E. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc 10, 845–858 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Rosenberg, M., Gutnick, D. & Rosenberg, E. Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: A simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 9, 29–33 (1980).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos 31401677 and 31401678) supported this study.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.Q.X. and Y.P.W. designed and conceived the experiments; Z.Q.X., W.T.G. and C.L. performed and analyzed the experiments; Z.Q.X., and Y.S. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanping Wang.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xing, Z., Geng, W., Li, C. et al. Comparative genomics of Lactobacillus kefiranofaciens ZW3 and related members of Lactobacillus. spp reveal adaptations to dairy and gut environments. Sci Rep 7, 12827 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12916-0

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing