Zebrafish In-Vivo Screening for Compounds Amplifying Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells: - Preclinical Validation in Human CD34+ Stem and Progenitor Cells

Arulmozhivarman, Guruchandar; Kräter, Martin; Wobus, Manja; Friedrichs, Jens; Bejestani, Elham Pishali; Müller, Katrin; Lambert, Katrin; Alexopoulou, Dimitra; Dahl, Andreas; Stöter, Martin; Bickle, Marc; Shayegi, Nona; Hampe, Jochen; Stölzel, Friedrich; Brand, Michael; von Bonin, Malte; Bornhäuser, Martin

doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12360-0

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 21 September 2017

Zebrafish In-Vivo Screening for Compounds Amplifying Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells: - Preclinical Validation in Human CD34+ Stem and Progenitor Cells

Guruchandar Arulmozhivarman¹^na1,
Martin Kräter ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0001-7122-7331¹^na1,
Manja Wobus¹,
Jens Friedrichs²,
Elham Pishali Bejestani^3,4,
Katrin Müller¹,
Katrin Lambert¹,
Dimitra Alexopoulou⁵,
Andreas Dahl ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2668-8371⁵,
Martin Stöter⁶,
Marc Bickle ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-8918-1869⁶,
Nona Shayegi⁷,
Jochen Hampe ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-2421-6127¹,
Friedrich Stölzel¹,
Michael Brand⁸,
Malte von Bonin ORCID: orcid.org/0000-0002-3828-0031^1,3,4^na1 &
…
Martin Bornhäuser^1,8^na1

Scientific Reports volume 7, Article number: 12084 (2017) Cite this article

3426 Accesses
9 Citations
3 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The identification of small molecules that either increase the number and/or enhance the activity of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (hHSPCs) during ex vivo expansion remains challenging. We used an unbiased in vivo chemical screen in a transgenic (c-myb:EGFP) zebrafish embryo model and identified histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs), particularly valproic acid (VPA), as significant enhancers of the number of phenotypic HSPCs, both in vivo and during ex vivo expansion. The long-term functionality of these expanded hHSPCs was verified in a xenotransplantation model with NSG mice. Interestingly, VPA increased CD34⁺ cell adhesion to primary mesenchymal stromal cells and reduced their in vitro chemokine-mediated migration capacity. In line with this, VPA-treated human CD34⁺ cells showed reduced homing and early engraftment in a xenograft transplant model, but retained their long-term engraftment potential in vivo, and maintained their differentiation ability both in vitro and in vivo. In summary, our data demonstrate that certain HDACIs lead to a net expansion of hHSPCs with retained long-term engraftment potential and could be further explored as candidate compounds to amplify ex-vivo engineered peripheral blood stem cells.

Microfluidic high-throughput 3D cell culture

Article 04 April 2024

Jihoon Ko, Dohyun Park, … Noo Li Jeon

RNAi-based drug design: considerations and future directions

Article 03 April 2024

Qi Tang & Anastasia Khvorova

An immunophenotype-coupled transcriptomic atlas of human hematopoietic progenitors

Article Open access 21 March 2024

Xuan Zhang, Baobao Song, … H. Leighton Grimes

Introduction

Mature blood cell lineages originate from a pool of self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and are an attractive source for stem-cell-based therapies like hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) that offer a potential cure for various malignant (leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma) and non-malignant (aplastic anemia) hematologic disorders. Currently, bone marrow (BM), umbilical cord blood (UCB), and peripheral blood from G-CSF (granulocyte-colony stimulating factor) treated donors are the major sources of stem cells for transplantation, and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) is the most common and widely used procedure in the clinical setting¹. However, issues regarding the yield of transplantable HSCs still prevail, especially in the context of UCB transplantation², despite the recent increase in the number of suitable donors and the success of haploidentical HSCT³. As low HSC numbers at transplantation have been associated with greater incidence of graft failure, delayed hematopoietic recovery, slow immune reconstitution, and early mortality, even in PBSCT recipients⁴, protocols that facilitate the ex vivo expansion of HSCs represent an important step to overcome these limitations. Further, efficient ex vivo expansion of genetically modified HSCs, obtained using novel gene editing techniques, can potentially be applied in patients with inborn genetic diseases (e.g. hemoglobinopathies)⁵.

Numerous attempts have been made to identify conditions and/or chemicals that allow the ex vivo expansion of functional hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC), including cytokine cocktails, feeder layer of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), and proteins or chemicals (e.g. notch ligand, aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonists, PGE₂, all-trans retinoic acid, and other epigenetic modulators)^{6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13}. However, amplification of HSPCs is not necessarily associated with preservation of HSPC function as some studies have reported loss of self-renewal capabilities, measured by the long-term repopulating capacity of these cells¹⁴. While certain procedures for ex vivo expansion have been shown to retain HSC function and clinical trials have attested to the feasibility of this approach¹⁵, successful hematopoietic recovery after HSC transplantation not only relies on self-renewal and differentiation capacity but also on homing to the bone marrow and subsequent lodging in hematopoietic stem cell niches¹⁶. Such migration and lodging of HSCs in specific niches are tightly regulated processes that are controlled by the expression and function of various molecules, including integrins (VLA-4, VLA-5, and LFA-1), selectins (P- and E-selectin), and certain chemokines (SDF-1)¹⁷.

In this study transgenic c-myb:EGFP zebrafish were used to screen and identify small molecules that modulated HSPC activity¹⁸. Histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs), namely, valproic acid (VPA), resminostat, and entinostat, significantly increased HSPC numbers, and their functional relevance was validated by analyzing runx1⁺ expression in the zebrafish embryos. HDACIs also produced similar effects in human HSPCs as human CD34⁺ cells could be extensively expanded in vitro using various HDACIs, especially, VPA. In vivo, even though VPA-expanded CD34⁺ HSPCs displayed impaired homing to the bone marrow of immunodeficient mice that resulted in reduced short-term engraftment as monitored by peripheral blood donor chimerism, they however, retained their long-term engraftment potential and maintained their differentiation ability both in vitro and in vivo. These results imply that HDACIs, particularly VPA, can be used for the in vitro expansion of G-CSF mobilized hHSPCs, but their use in clinical transplantation protocols should consider impaired homing and lower short-term-engraftment.

Results

HDACIs increase c-myb⁺ HSPC number and runx1 expression in zebrafish embryos

A recently developed semi-automated imaging assay¹⁸ was used on transgenic zebrafish embryos expressing c-myb:EGFP in HSPCs to screen 550 compounds and identify small molecules that modulate HSPC activity. In zebrafish hematopoiesis, long-term HSCs occur in the aorta-gonad-mesonephros (AGM) at approximately 30 hours post fertilization (hpf) and migrate to the caudal hematopoietic tissue (CHT) region, colonize the thymus, and finally translocate to the kidney marrow, which is the equivalent of mammalian bone marrow¹⁹ (Fig. 1a). c-myb is expressed in the cells of the AGM and CHT regions in zebrafish during hematopoiesis^20,21. In the assay, embryos were exposed to compounds at concentrations of 20 or 40 µM and between 12 and 36 hpf. Compared to DMSO-treated controls, three HDACIs, namely valproic acid (VPA), resminostat, and entinostat, significantly increased the number of c-myb⁺ cells in the AGM and CHT regions (DMSO 93 ± 4, VPA 137 ± 22, resminostat 194 ± 29, entinostat 150 ± 19, p < 0.001 for all; Fig. 1b and c). These observations were validated by whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) for runx1 on wild type embryos as runx1, a transcription factor, is an essential regulator of definitive hematopoiesis and is consistently expressed in HSCs at all sites of embryonic and adult hematopoiesis²². All three HDACIs triggered an increase in runx1⁺ cells in the AGM compared to minimal expression in control embryos (Fig. 1d,e), suggesting that HDAC inhibition by VPA, resminostat, or entinostat leads to the in vivo expansion of HSPCs in zebrafish.

HDAC inhibitors increase zebrafish hematopoietic cell engraftment efficiency

Of the identified hits, VPA was chosen for validation using an ex vivo transplantation procedure. Zebrafish adult whole kidney marrow (WKM) cells from Tg(ubi:GFP) animals²³ were treated with VPA (50 µM) or PBS (control) in vitro, transplanted into irradiated Casper²⁴ adult zebrafish (Fig. S1). This incubation time was chosen based on data from pilot experiments that showed a sharp reduction in cell viability after longer time-periods of ex vivo culture. After 28 days, the WKM cells from recipient Casper fish were analyzed by flow cytometry for engraftment of donor cells (Fig. 2a). VPA treatment significantly increased WKM cell engraftment compared to PBS treatment (donor chimerism 46.5 ± 26.8% vs. 0.7 ± 0.2; p = 0.0056; Fig. 2b), suggesting that ex vivo VPA treatment maintains the stem cell potential of WKM cells and increases the engraftment capability after transplantation in this model.

HDACIs increase CD34⁺ and CD34⁺CD90⁺ cell populations in human G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells

Next, the effects of HDACIs on human CD34⁺ G-CSF-mobilized peripheral blood stem cells (purity >95%) were analyzed by treating them in vitro with VPA, resminostat, or entinostat for five consecutive days in the presence of cytokines. The number and phenotype of the cultured cells were assessed at the end of the treatment period. The proportion of CD34⁺ cells was 79.4 ± 2.4%, 70.2 ± 2.8%, and 72.2 ± 2.2% for VPA, resminostat, and entinostat, respectively, compared to 35.6 ± 3.2% and 29.4 ± 3.3% for PBS- or DMSO-treated controls (p < 0.001 for all; Fig. 3a). Importantly, the fraction of CD34⁺CD90⁺ cells, a population known to be enriched in repopulating cells²⁵, was higher in VPA, resminostat, or entinostat treated samples (59.3 ± 3.4%, 71.5 ± 3.8%, and 67.9 ± 4.3%, respectively) compared to PBS- or DMSO-treated cells (2.2 ± 0.7% and 2.0 ± 0.2%, respectively (p < 0.001 for all; Fig. 3a). All three HDACIs also amplified the starting cell numbers compared to controls and resulted in significantly higher absolute cell numbers of both CD34⁺ and CD34⁺CD90⁺ cell populations after 5 days of in vitro treatment (Fig. 3b and c). Thus, HDACIs identified from the zebrafish screen expanded phenotypic human HSPCs in vitro. As VPA exerted similar effects as the other two compounds but had lower toxicity over a broader range of concentrations, all subsequent experiments on human HSPCs were performed with VPA alone.

VPA increases attachment of hHSPCs on MSCs during ex vivo expansion

As MSCs are one of the supporting factors of HSPC maintenance²⁶ and proliferation¹¹, we investigated if VPA influences the interaction between hHSPCs and MSCs in vitro. Similar to suspension cultures, VPA induced hHSPC expansion in co-cultures with MSCs. In addition, a higher density of hHSPCs were attached to the MSC layer in the VPA-treated group than the control group (Fig. 4a), and 3-fold greater number of hHSPCs were attached to MSCs in the VPA-treated group compared to controls (Fig. 4b). These findings prompted us to investigate the adhesion strength between VPA-treated CD34⁺ cells and MSCs using atomic force microscopy-based single-cell force spectroscopy (AFM-SCFS) under defined conditions of contact force and time. The adhesion between hHSPCs and the substrate-bound MSC was quantified during retraction (Fig. 4c). In accordance with the bulk assays, higher detachment forces, i.e. stronger cell-cell interactions, between HSPCs and MSCs were measured in VPA-treated cells compared to PBS-treated controls (Fig. 4d). These observations suggest that VPA-treated CD34⁺ cells are more adhesive and that this adhesiveness can result in greater interaction with MSCs. Thus, VPA-induced expansion of phenotypic HSPCs in vitro is also associated with enhanced attachment to MSCs.

VPA treatment preserves self-renewal capacity and differentiation potential

To determine whether VPA-expanded cells retained their differentiation capacity, we performed colony forming unit (CFU) assays and compared their clonogenicity to freshly isolated human CD34⁺ cells from GCS-F mobilized blood. VPA-treated cells formed significantly fewer total number of colonies compared to the PBS treated cells (Fig. S3a). This difference was mainly due to an increase in BFU-E (burst forming unit-erythroid) colonies in the PBS-treated CD34⁺ cells as there were no statistically significant differences in the total number of CFU-G, CFU-M, CFU-GM, and CFU-GEMM populations between the VPA- and PBS-treated CD34⁺ cells. These observations imply that VPA treatment does not affect clonogenicity and differentiation capacity of the hHSPCs (Fig. S3b). We also analyzed the cobblestone area forming cell (CFAC) potential of ex vivo expanded CD34⁺ cells to characterize their in vitro stem cell functions and found no significant differences between VPA-treated and control cells (Fig. S3c).

VPA suppresses CXCR4 expression and HSPC migration toward SDF-1 in vitro

Successful HSC transplantation depends on effective HSPC homing and engraftment in the bone morrow after transplantation, and stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1, CXCL12) and its receptor CXCR4 (CD184) play essential roles²⁷. To investigate migration and homing potential of ex vivo VPA-expanded hHSPCs, we measured CXCR4 expression using flow cytometry (Fig. 5a) and found a drastic reduction in CXCR4 expression upon VPA treatment compared to control cells (Fig. 5b). This reduction was confirmed by real-time PCR (Fig. 5c) and verified by RNA-seq data (Fig. 5h). RNA-seq data also revealed that VPA treatment induced SDF-1 expression in CD34⁺ cells (Fig. 5h). The functional relevance of these findings was tested by quantifying the migration capacity of VPA-expanded CD34⁺ cells toward SDF-1 using a transwell migration assay where we detected significantly lower numbers of migratory CD34⁺ cells compared to PBS-treated control hHSPCs (Fig. 5d).

Next, we used flow cytometry In order to identify other molecular pathways that could mediate the increased adhesiveness of VPA-treated cells and found that the adhesion molecule CD146 (MCAM) was expressed on 40% of VPA-treated CD34⁺ cells while control cells did not express this molecule (Fig. 5e and f). Quantitative PCR analysis (Fig. 5g) and RNA-seq (Fig. 5h) also showed significantly elevated MCAM transcript levels in VPA-treated cells compared to PBS-treated controls. However, RNA-seq data also showed that VPA induced the expression of several cell adhesion molecules along with MCAM (Fig. 5h). Thus, VPA not only decreases CXCR4 expression on CD34⁺ cells that is associated with reduced migratory potential toward SDF-1, but also triggers the upregulation of specific adhesion molecules including MCAM, which probably mediate the VPA-induced increase in the adhesion capacity.

VPA treatment reduces bone marrow homing efficiency of CD34⁺ cells

As VPA-expanded CD34⁺ cells exhibited reduced migration towards SDF-1 in vitro, we tested their bone marrow homing capacity in NSG mice. Equal numbers of re-isolated CD34⁺ cells (1 × 10⁶ cells/mouse), treated with either VPA or PBS, were intravenously injected into sub-lethally irradiated NSG mice (Fig. 6a), and the bone marrow of recipient mice analyzed for the presence of human CD45⁺ cells 24 hours after injection. Mice injected with VPA-treated human CD34⁺ cells had significantly lower number of human leucocytes in the bone marrow compared to those that received control cells (1.6 ± 0.2 × 10²/femur vs. 4.4 ± 0.7 × 10², p = 0.0001; Fig. 6b), implying reduced in vivo bone marrow homing capacity of these cells.

VPA-expanded hHSPCs retain their long-term repopulating potential in immunocompromised mice

Next, we investigated the repopulating potential of in vitro VPA-expanded human CD34⁺ cells by transplanting equal numbers of VPA-expanded or PBS-treated re-isolated CD34⁺ cells into sub-lethally irradiated immunocompromised mice. Peripheral blood chimerism and the phenotype of circulating human leucocytes were monitored periodically and human leucocyte repopulation of the bone marrow was assessed at 20 weeks after transplantation (Fig. 7a). While there were no differences in peripheral blood chimerism at the 4-week time point or the 12-week and later time points, at 8-weeks mice receiving PBS-treated CD34⁺ cells tended to have higher overall chimerism compared to those given VPA-treated CD34⁺ cells (14 ± 3.5% vs. 5 ± 3.1%, p = 0.0913, unpaired t-test) (Fig. 7b). Thus, despite impaired short-term engraftment, as measured by peripheral blood chimerism, the phenotype of the circulating human leucocytes was indistinguishable between the two groups, suggesting that in vitro VPA treatment did not affect the differentiation potential of these cells for the main hematopoietic lineages, namely, CD3⁺ T cells, CD19⁺ B cells, and CD33⁺ myeloid cells (Fig. 7c). Similar to the results of peripheral blood chimerism, long-term bone marrow engraftment in recipient mice showed no significant differences in overall BM chimerism (PBS: 11.3 ± 4.2%, VPA: 8 ± 7.4%; Fig. 7d). Further, the numbers of human leucocyte-derived T lymphocytes (CD3⁺), B lymphocytes (CD19⁺), and myeloid cells (CD33⁺) were indistinguishable between the two groups (Fig. 7e). These results confirm in vitro data (Fig. S3) that VPA treatment does not negatively affect the long-term engraftment capacity and differentiation potential of human CD34⁺ cells. Importantly, as VPA treatment increases the overall number of CD34⁺ cells by 2–3 fold compared to controls (Fig. 3b), ex vivo VPA treatment results in a net expansion of mouse-repopulating HSCs.

VPA-induced changes in the gene-expression profile of CD34⁺ HSPCs

To test how VPA affects gene expression in CD34⁺ cells, we performed mRNA sequencing. Freshly isolated CD34⁺ cells were treated with either VPA or PBS for 5 days and RNA-seq performed on total RNA isolated from both sets of CD34⁺ cells. The clustering of individual biological replicates revealed high homology between samples (Fig. 8a). A comparison of gene expression profiles between the two sets revealed that VPA treatment upregulated 1215 genes and downregulated 162 genes (Fig. 8b). GO (gene ontology) pathway analysis revealed an increase in the expression of genes predominantly involved in cell adhesion due to VPA treatment. This observation is in agreement with data from attachment assays, including AFM-SCFS, which showed greater adhesiveness of VPA-expanded cells toward MSCs. In addition, VPA-treated CD34⁺ cells also significantly downregulated genes that participate in chemotaxis. This result is in line with the observed impairment of chemotactic behavior in vitro, especially the SDF-1/CXCR4 axis. VPA-expanded cells also increased the expression of genes involved in Notch and wnt signaling (Fig. S6). Pluripotency genes such as OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG were not upregulated (Fig. S5), and the changes in the expression of CXCR4, MCAM, OCT4, SOX2, and NANOG were further verified by quantitative real-time PCR.

Discussion

We have identified HDAC inhibitors, particularly VPA, resminostat, and entinostat, as potent in vitro multipliers of hHSPCs. Initially, a transgenic zebrafish model was used to screen for molecules capable of expanding the HSPC pool in vivo, and although several HDACIs were included in the screen, only VPA, resminostat, and entinostat increased the number of c-myb⁺ HSPCs, suggesting that HSPC expansion is specific to these three drugs rather than a general group effect of HDACIs. Importantly, the results from the zebrafish screen were reproduced in human HSPCs as in vitro treatment of CD34⁺ cells isolated from G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood with these HDACIs led to a significantly greater expansion of both phenotypic and functional HSPCs. Even though in vitro VPA-induced expansion of G-CSF mobilized CD34⁺ cells was associated with functional changes that affected homing and short-term engraftment, their in vivo long-term engraftment (and thereby self-renewal) and differentiation capacity remained unaltered.

The use of G-CSF mobilized HSPCs has many advantages over allogeneic bone marrow transplantation such as earlier hematopoietic recovery in the recipient, higher anti-leukemic activity, and a less invasive procedure for the donor. Engraftment is also much faster compared to cord blood stem cells and the greater numbers of HSPCs obtained by G-CSF ad apheresis predestine mobilized HSPCs as starting material for future genetic-engineering approaches. Therefore, identification and validation of small molecules that significantly expand mobilized HSPC numbers ex vivo represent a clinically attractive approach, and our results imply that ex vivo treatment of mobilized HSPCs with VPA can increase the absolute number of CD34⁺ cells with preserved in vivo repopulating potential.

While our results have further contributed to the body of evidence that the zebrafish model represents a valuable tool to study vertebrate hematopoiesis^12,28, more importantly, its use as an in vivo screening tool is valuable as large drug libraries can be efficiently screened and any systemic effects made readily apparent.

The fate of any cell, including HSPCs, is substantially influenced by epigenetics^29,30. Among several functionally relevant epigenetic modifications, DNA methylation and histone acetylation play important roles in health and disease as they regulate gene expression, and drugs that target or modify methylation and acetylation patterns are associated with a range of conditions, including cancer progression^31,32. Importantly, HDACIs and hypomethylating agents (HMAs) have been shown to alter the epigenetic status of HSPCs^33,34, and epigenetic modifiers such as 5-Aza 2′-deoxycytidine (an HMA) and trichostatin-A (an HDACI) are capable of expanding CD34⁺CD90⁺ BM cells with preserved long-term repopulating potential³⁵. A recent report also showed that VPA can epigenetically reprogram cord blood (CB)-derived CD34⁺ cells in vitro that leads to extensive expansion of functional CB HSCs; these cells have improved repopulating capacity in NSG mice compared to control treated cells. Furthermore, they detected that higher number of VPA treated cells residing within G0/G1 and G2/M phase than the cells that are exposed to control¹⁰. However, they also found that in vitro VPA treatment led to greater CXCR4 expression that was associated with enhanced migration toward a SDF-1 gradient in vitro and increased homing to the bone marrow of NSG mice in vivo. Contrarily, our cell cycle analyses revealed no difference in the proportion of CD34 + cells in G0/G1 vs S/M-phase after VPA treatment compared to control (Fig. S2) and we show that CXCR4 downregulation upon VPA treatment, identified by flow cytometry and confirmed by direct RNA-Seq, and complementary simultaneous upregulation of SDF-1, indicating the presence of an autocrine feedback-loop³⁶. These disparities in CXCR4 expression between the two studies can be explained in part by differences in HSPC source and experimental conditions such as cytokine concentration/combination and culture medium. Further, G-CSF mobilized CD34⁺ cells exhibit robust CXCR4 expression levels probably because their metalloproteinase-induced degradation declines during differentiation³⁷. Dynamic changes in CXCR4 expression should also be considered as a previous study reported that CXCR4 expression is heterogeneous in the human HSPC compartment and that its stem cell repopulating potential does not necessarily correlate with CXCR4 expression³⁸.

The success of HSCT by intravenous infusion of the graft also relies on the homing of HSCs to recipient bone marrow. This process is regulated by multiple molecular events such as cell-cell interaction, migration and adhesion. We observed reduced homing of the VPA-primed CD34⁺ cells that was associated with either unaffected or lower overall peripheral blood chimerism in recipient mice at 8 weeks after transplantation. Conversely, at this time point; Chaurasia et al. (2004) found a significant increase in bone marrow overall chimerism in NSG mice transplanted with VPA-treated CB CD34⁺ cells; however, these results cannot be directly compared, as peripheral blood chimerism does not necessarily reflect levels of bone marrow chimerism.

Apart from reduced migration, we observed an increase in the adhesiveness of VPA-treated CD34⁺ cells toward MSCs in co-culture experiments and quantified this force using AFM–SCFS. Cell adhesion is typically mediated by multiprotein complexes that connect individual cells to the extracellular matrix (ECM) and to other cells. Several specialized adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1, NCAM, VCAM-1, and N-cadherin are expressed on subsets of HSCs and are known to be crucial for HSC function and niche interaction^39,40,41,42. The gene expression data reported here show that several molecules known to be involved in cell adhesion, including NCAM, are upregulated in VPA-treated CD34⁺ cells. Unexpectedly, the expression of melanoma cell adhesion molecule (MCAM, CD146) was upregulated in VPA-treated CD34⁺ cells and its surface expression was verified by flow cytometry. This result is surprising as while it is known that MCAM is commonly expressed within the vascular wall, including in the vascular endothelial cells, the vascular smooth muscle cells, and the MSCs⁴³, its expression has not been described in HSCs. Further, MCAM expression on MSCs is known to influence the fate of HSCs⁴⁴. MCAM expression has also been demonstrated on subsets of activated T- and B-lymphocytes, mainly in the context of inflammatory conditions⁴⁵. We hypothesize that this induction of MCAM expression is involved in the increased adhesiveness of HSPCs on MSCs and is supported by AFM measurements.

In contrast to the observed reduction in bone marrow homing and short-term engraftment, long-term engraftment and differentiation capacity of VPA-treated CD34⁺ cells was not different from controls. Also, the relative and absolute numbers of human phenotypic HSPCs in the bone marrow of NSG mice at 20 weeks after transplantation were indistinguishable between VPA and controls, suggesting that the in vitro VPA-expanded CD34⁺ cells retained their stem cell properties. These results show that VPA significantly influences the functional activity of HSPCs but the effect on stem cell frequency still needs to be determined. A previous report showed that VPA-induced expansion of CB CD34⁺ cells in vitro was associated with a transient increase in the expression of genes associated with chromatin remodeling and pluripotency in induced pluripotent stem cells (iPS) and embryonic stem cells (ES), such as SOX2, OCT4, and NANOG ¹⁰. Interestingly, we found that VPA did not induce the expression of these pluripotency genes in G-CSF mobilized adult CD34⁺ cells (Fig. S5) but rather upregulated Jag2, Notch3, Hes1, and DLL1 (Fig. S6a). Such recurrent variations in results between these two studies point to the differential effects of VPA on the ontogenetically more immature CB CD34⁺ HSCs compared to the mature G-CSF mobilized adult CD34⁺ cells. Importantly, these genes (Jag2, Notch3, Hes1, and DLL1) and their related pathways are all known to be involved in the preservation of stem cell properties during the ex vivo expansion of HSCs⁴⁶. Furthermore, DLL1 induces erythroid differentiation and inhibits myeloid skewing^47,48.

The role of wnt signaling in the regulation of hematopoiesis has been extensively studied⁴⁹, and both the canonical and non-canonical pathways of wnt signaling are crucial for HSC maintenance and activation⁵⁰. Gene expression data presented here (Fig. S6b) show upregulation of several genes that are involved in both canonical and non-canonical wnt signaling, such as Frizilled (Fzd) 8 and Flemingo (Fmi), members of the non-canonical wnt signaling pathway that are crucial for long-term quiescent HSC maintenance⁵¹.

To conclude, we show that certain HDACIs enhance the in vitro expansion of CD34⁺ HSPCs derived from G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood and that, functionally, these cells are capable of effective long-term engraftment and multi-lineage differentiation, even though VPA treatment led to reduced homing and short-term engraftment that are probably related to lower migratory capacity and enhanced adhesiveness. Importantly, as our observations are in contrast to previous work with cord blood derived CD34⁺ cells, we conclude that VPA-mediated effects on HSPCs are distinct and depend on the graft source used. Lastly, impaired short-term engraftment that might lead to prolonged cytopenia after transplantation of in vitro VPA expanded G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells has to be considered when translating HDACI-based expansion protocols into the clinical setting.

Materials and Methods

Detailed materials and methods are described in the supporting information materials and methods. All experiments were performed in accordance with the local and national regulations and guidelines and were approved by the local institutional review board (Ethical committee of Technischen Universität Dresden, Fiedlerstraße 33, 01307 Dresden). The xenotransplant experiments were performed according to the national guidelines after approval by the local animal protection committee.

Small molecule screen and validation

All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with live animal handling and research regulations under protocols approved by the animal ethics committees of the Technische Universität Dresden and the Landesdirektion Sachsen (approval number no: AZ 24D-9168.11-1/2008-4). Fish were maintained at 28 °C⁵², and synchronized embryos from homozygous zebrafish c-myb:EGFP¹² transgenic line were collected in E3. The semi-automated in vivo chemical screen was performed as described previously¹⁸. Several small focused libraries were screened, including an epigenetic modulator library (Selleckchem) containing several HDACIs. Identified hits from the chemical screen were validated by whole-mount in situ hybridization for runx1 expression as described elsewhere⁵³. Compounds were also tested at a concentration of 40 µM and imaged as reported previously⁵⁴.

Adult zebrafish kidney marrow transplantation

Adult kidney marrow cells from multiple Tg(ubi:GFP) fish were harvested, WKM cells dissociated, pooled, and filtered⁵⁵. Unfractionated WKM cells were incubated in vitro at 28 °C in ZKS (zebrafish kidney stromal) medium⁵⁶ and treated with either VPA (50 µM) or PBS control for 48 hours. One day before transplantation, three-month-old Casper recipient fish were sub-lethally irradiated at 15 cGy. The ex vivo chemical treatment of WKM cells and their transplantation were performed as previously reported⁵⁷ (Fig. S1). Fresh WKM cells from Tg(ubi:GFP) animals were used as a positive control to measure engraftment efficiency. Donor chimerism was assessed on a BD LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and its analysis limited to myelomonocytes, as described previously⁵⁸.

Ex vivo culture and co-culture assay

G-CSF (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) mobilized peripheral blood for CD34⁺ HSPC isolation and bone marrow for MSC isolation was obtained from healthy donors after informed consent (ethical approval no. EK221102004, EK47022007) and human cells were isolated according to the Ethical committee of Technischen Universität Dresden (https://www.tu-dresden.de/tu-dresden/organisation/gremien-und-beauftragte/kommissionen/ethikkommission). Purified CD34⁺ cells (1 × 10⁴ cells/well) were cultured in CellGro serum free medium (CellGenix) supplemented with 10 ng/ml stem cell factor (SCF), 10 ng/ml Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand (FLT3 ligand), 10 ng/ml interleukin 3 (IL-3), and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO_2. After 24 h, the cells were exposed to PBS, VPA (1 mM), DMSO, resminostat (1.5 µM), or entinostat (1.5 µM) for 5 days. After treatment, expanded cells were stained for CD34 and CD90 expression. For further experiments, CD34⁺ cells were re-isolated from ex vivo-expanded cells and their purity analyzed as stated above. For co-culture experiments, freshly isolated CD34⁺ cells were suspended in CellGro serum free medium supplemented with cytokines and plated onto a confluent MSC layer. Co-culture of CD34⁺ cells with human MSCs was performed as previously described¹¹.

Atomic force microscopy-based single-cell force spectroscopy (AFM-SCFS)

A NanoWizard II AFM equipped with a CellHesion module (JPK Instruments), mounted on an inverted light microscope (Axiovert 200, Carl Zeiss), was used to perform AFM-SCFS. All measurements were performed in PBS containing Ca²⁺/Mg²⁺ at 37 °C using a temperature-controlled sample chamber (PetriDish Heater, JPK Instruments). Tipless cantilevers with a nominal spring constant of 0.08 N/m (PNP-TR-TL-Au, Nanoworld) were coated with 1 mg/ml wheat germ agglutinin (Vector Laboratories) as described previously⁵⁹. Cantilevers were calibrated before every experiment using built-in functions of the AFM software (JPK Instruments) based on the equipartition theorem⁶⁰. For SCFS experiments, MSCs were grown to confluence in 30-mm Petri dishes (TPP-Sigma-Aldrich). The Petri dish was placed in the PetriDish Heater and subsequently, 1 × 10³ CD34⁺ HSPCs, either PBS- or VPA-treated for 5 days, were seeded into the Petri dish. A single HSPC was attached to the AFM cantilever as described⁵⁹. Force-distance (F-D) curves were acquired by approaching the cantilever-bound HSPC at a constant speed of 5μm/sec onto a single MSC in the Petri dish until a contact force of 2 nN was reached. Before retraction of the cantilever-bound cell at constant speed (5 μm/sec), cells were maintained in contact for 60 sec in constant force mode. Approximately 10 F-D curves per cell and 10 cells/condition were measured, yielding 100 data points per condition. Data processing software provided by the AFM manufacturer was used to extract maximum detachment force (F_detach) from retract F-D curves.

Homing Assay

All animal experiments were performed according institutional guidelines and the German animal protection law (Landesdirektion Sachsen, 24-9168.11-1/2013-54). Re-isolated CD34⁺ cells (1 × 10⁶ cells/mouse), both VPA-treated and controls, were transplanted by retro-orbital injection into NSG mice. The recipient mice were irradiated (100 cGy) 24 h prior to transplantation. Bone marrow of recipient mice (one femur/mouse) was analyzed 24 h after transplantation by flow cytometry for the presence of human CD45⁺. Eight NSG mice received PBS expanded cells (control) while 14 mice received VPA-expanded cells. Eleven mice did not receive any cells and their bone marrow was similarly analyzed to determine thresholds for the analysis of human cells.

Long-term engraftment assay

CD34⁺ cells were re-isolated after 5 days ex vivo treatment with VPA or PBS (control) and 3.5 × 10⁵ cells/mouse were transplanted by intravenous injection in the retro-orbital venous plexus of the recipient mice. NSG mice were sub-lethally irradiated with 100 cGy 24 h prior to transplantation. To assess engraftment, peripheral blood from recipient mice was obtained every 4 weeks by retro-orbital bleeding and collected in heparinized hematocrit capillaries (Brand GMBH). Peripheral blood was analyzed by flow cytometry using anti-mouse CD45, anti-human CD45, CD3, CD19 and CD33 antibodies. Mice were sacrificed at 20 weeks after transplantation and the bone marrow of each mouse (2 femurs and 1 tibia) was analyzed for the presence of human cells using anti-mouse CD45, anti-human CD45, CD3, CD19, and CD33 antibodies.

Statistics

Data were analyzed using student’s t-test by GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). All data are from at least three independent experiments, unless otherwise specified. Results are expressed as the mean ± SD or the mean ± SEM of varying numbers in individual experiments. Statistical significance was defined as *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Data availability

The authors declare that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the paper and its supplementary information files or can be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request. The gene expression data reported in this paper have been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo (Reference super-series GSE90552).

References

Niederwieser, D. et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation activity worldwide in 2012 and a SWOT analysis of the Worldwide Network for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Group including the global survey. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2016.18 (2016).
Laughlin, M. J. et al. Hematopoietic engraftment and survival in adult recipients of umbilical-cord blood from unrelated donors. N Engl J Med 344, 1815–1822 (2001).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kasamon, Y. L. et al. Outcomes of nonmyeloablative HLA-haploidentical blood or marrow transplantation with high-dose post-transplantation cyclophosphamide in older adults. in. Journal of Clinical Oncology 33, 3152–3161 (2015).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Pulsipher, M. A. et al. Donor, recipient, and transplant characteristics as risk factors after unrelated donor PBSC transplantation: Beneficial effects of higher CD34+ cell dose. Blood 114, 2606–2616 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dever, D. P. et al. CRISPR/Cas9 β-globin gene targeting in human haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 539, 384–389 (2016).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Anthony, B. A. & Link, D. C. Regulation of hematopoietic stem cells by bone marrow stromal cells. Trends in Immunology 35, 32–37 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bartels, M., Geest, C. R., Bierings, M., Buitenhuis, M. & Coffer, P. J. Histone deacetylase inhibition modulates cell fate decisions during myeloid differentiation. Haematologica 95, 1052–1060 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bigas, A. & Espinosa, L. Hematopoietic stem cells: To be or Notch to be. Blood 119, 3226–3235 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Boitano, A. E. A. et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonists promote the expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells. Science (80-.). 329, 1345–1348 (2010).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar
Chaurasia, P., Gajzer, D. C., Schaniel, C., D’Souza, S. & Hoffman, R. Epigenetic reprogramming induces the expansion of cord blood stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 2378–95 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jing, D. et al. Hematopoietic stem cells in co-culture with mesenchymal stromal cells -modeling the niche compartments in vitro. Haematologica 95, 542–550 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
North, T. E. et al. Prostaglandin E2 regulates vertebrate haematopoietic stem cell homeostasis. Nature 447, 1007–1011 (2007).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang, C. C. & Lodish, H. F. Cytokines regulating hematopoietic stem cell function. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 15, 307–311 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ueda, T. et al. Expansion of human NOD/SCID-repopulating cells by stem cell factor, Flk2/Flt3 ligand, thrombopoietin, IL-6, and soluble IL-6 receptor. J. Clin. Invest. 105, 1013–1021 (2000).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Delaney, C. et al. Notch-mediated expansion of human cord blood progenitor cells capable of rapid myeloid reconstitution. Nat. Med. 16, 232–236 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Heazlewood, S. Y., Oteiza, A., Cao, H. & Nilsson, S. K. Analyzing hematopoietic stem cell homing, lodgment, and engraftment to better understand the bone marrow niche. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1310, 119–128 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kopp, H.-G., Avecilla, S. T., Hooper, A. T. & Rafii, S. The bone marrow vascular niche: home of HSC differentiation and mobilization. Physiology (Bethesda). 20, 349–356 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Arulmozhivarman, G. et al. In Vivo Chemical Screen in Zebrafish Embryos Identifies Regulators of Hematopoiesis Using a Semiautomated Imaging Assay. J. Biomol. Screen. 21, 956–964 (2016).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Goessling, W. & North, T. E. Hematopoietic Stem Cell Development: Using the Zebrafish to Identify the Signaling Networks and Physical Forces Regulating Hematopoiesis. Methods Cell Biol. 105, 117–136 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mukouyama, Y. S. et al. Hematopoietic cells in cultures of the murine embryonic aorta-gonad-mesonephros region are induced by c-Myb. Curr. Biol. 9, 833–836 (1999).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., Jin, H., Li, L., Qin, F. X. F. & Wen, Z. cMyb regulates hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell mobilization during zebrafish hematopoiesis. Blood 118, 4093–4101 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Burns, C. E. et al. Isolation and characterization of runxa and runxb, zebrafish members of the runt family of transcriptional regulators. Exp. Hematol. 30, 1381–1389 (2002).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mosimann, C. et al. Ubiquitous transgene expression and Cre-based recombination driven by the ubiquitin promoter in zebrafish. Development 138, 169–177 (2011).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
White, R. M. et al. Transparent Adult Zebrafish as a Tool for In Vivo Transplantation Analysis. Cell Stem Cell 2, 183–189 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Craig, W., Kay, R., Cutler, R. L. & Lansdorp, P. M. Expression of Thy-1 on human hematopoietic progenitor cells. J. Exp. Med. 177, 1331–1342 (1993).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Morrison, S. J. & Scadden, D. T. The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 505, 327–34 (2014).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Peled, A. et al. Dependence of human stem cell engraftment and repopulation of NOD/SCID mice on CXCR4. Science 283, 845–8 (1999).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hsia, N. & Zon, L. I. Transcriptional regulation of hematopoietic stem cell development in zebrafish. Experimental Hematology 33, 1007–1014 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lunyak, V. V. & Rosenfeld, M. G. Epigenetic regulation of stem cell fate. Human Molecular Genetics 17 (2008).
Bartholdy, B. et al. HSC commitment-associated epigenetic signature is prognostic in acute myeloid leukemia. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 1158–1167 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jones, P. A. & Baylin, S. B. The Epigenomics of Cancer. Cell 128, 683–692 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fraga, M. F. et al. Loss of acetylation at Lys16 and trimethylation at Lys20 of histone H4 is a common hallmark of human cancer. Nat. Genet. 37, 391–400 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Mahmud, N. et al. Differential effects of epigenetic modifiers on the expansion and maintenance of human cord blood stem/progenitor cells. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 20, 480–489 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Challen, G. A. et al. Dnmt3a is essential for hematopoietic stem cell differentiation. Nat. Genet. 44, 23–31 (2011).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Milhem, M. et al. Modification of hematopoietic stem cell fate by 5aza 2′deoxycytidine and trichostatin A. Blood 103, 4102–4110 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, J.-C. et al. Down-regulation of CXCR4 expression by SDF-KDEL in CD34(+) hematopoietic stem cells: An anti-human immunodeficiency virus strategy. J. Virol. Methods 161, 30–7 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rutella, S. et al. Homogeneous expression of CXC chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) on G-CSF–mobilized peripheral blood CD341 cells. Blood 95, 4015–4016 (2000).
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Rosu-Myles, M. et al. The human hematopoietic stem cell compartment is heterogeneous for CXCR4 expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97, 14626–31 (2000).
Article ADS CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Teixidó, J., Hemler, M. E., Greenberger, J. S. & Anklesaria, P. Role of beta 1 and beta 2 integrins in the adhesion of human CD34hi stem cells to bone marrow stroma. J. Clin. Invest. 90, 358–367 (1992).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kato, J. et al. Contribution of neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) to hemopoietic system in monkeys. Ann. Hematol. 87, 797–807 (2008).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ulyanova, T. et al. VCAM-1 expression in adult hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells is controlled by tissue-inductive signals and reflects their developmental origin. Blood 106, 86–94 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Arai, F., Hosokawa, K., Toyama, H., Matsumoto, Y. & Suda, T. Role of N-cadherin in the regulation of hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow niche. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1266, 72–77 (2012).
Article ADS CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Espagnolle, N. et al. CD146 expression on mesenchymal stem cells is associated with their vascular smooth muscle commitment. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 18, 104–114 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stopp, S. et al. Expression of the melanoma cell adhesion molecule in human mesenchymal stromal cells regulates proliferation, differentiation, and maintenance of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Haematologica 98, 505–513 (2013).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Elshal, M., Khan, S., Takahashi, Y., Solomon, M. & McCoy, J. J. CD146 (Mel-CAM), an adhesion marker of endothelial cells, is a novel marker of lymphocyte. Blood 106, 2923–2924 (2005).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Benveniste, P. et al. Notchsignals are required for in vitro but not in vivo maintenance of human hematopoietic stem cells and delay the appearance of multipotent progenitors. Blood 123, 1167–1177 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Yamamura, K. et al. Notch ligand Delta-1 differentially modulates the effects of gp130 activation on interleukin-6 receptor??-positive and -negative human hematopoietic progenitors. Cancer Sci. 98, 1597–1603 (2007).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Neves, H. et al. Effects of Delta1 and Jagged1 on early human hematopoiesis: correlation with expression of notch signaling-related genes in CD34+ cells. Stem Cells 24, 1328–37 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lento, W., Congdon, K., Voermans, C., Kritzik, M. & Reya, T. Wnt signaling in normal and malignant hematopoiesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 5 (2013).
Clevers, H. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in development and disease. Cell 127, 469–80 (2006).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sugimura, R. et al. Noncanonical Wnt signaling maintains hematopoietic stem cells in the niche. Cell 150, 351–365 (2012).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Brand, M., Granato, M. & Nüsslein-Volhard, C. Keeping and raising zebrafish. Zebrafish 261, 7–38 (2002).
Google Scholar
Thisse, B. & Thisse, C. In situ hybridization on whole-mount zebrafish embryos and young larvae. Methods Mol. Biol. 1211, 53–67 (2014).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Trompouki, E. & Zon, L. I. Small molecule screen in zebrafish and HSC expansion. Methods Mol. Biol. 636, 301–316 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Traver, D. et al. Effects of lethal irradiation in zebrafish and rescue by hematopoietic cell transplantation. Blood 104, 1298–1305 (2004).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Stachura, D. L. et al. Zebrafish kidney stromal cell lines support multilineage hematopoiesis. Blood 114, 279–289 (2009).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Li, P. et al. Epoxyeicosatrienoic acids enhance embryonic haematopoiesis and adult marrow engraftment. Nature 523, 468–471 (2015).
Article ADS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Traver, D. et al. Transplantation and in vivo imaging of multilineage engraftment in zebrafish bloodless mutants. Nat. Immunol. 4, 1238–1246 (2003).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Friedrichs, J., Helenius, J. & Muller, D. J. Quantifying cellular adhesion to extracellular matrix components by single-cell force spectroscopy. Nat. Protoc. 5, 1353–1361 (2010).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hutter, J. L. & Bechhoefer, J. Calibration of atomic-force microscope tips. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64, 1868–1873 (1993).
Article ADS CAS Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank David Traver for the Tg(c-myb:eGFP) transgenic line used in this study; Leonard I. Zon, Harvard Stem Cell Program, Boston Children’s Hospital, for supporting Nona Shayegi during her tenure as a visiting scientist in his laboratory; Naharajan lakshmanaperumal for assistance with Figures 8 and S4; Mathias Lesche for assistance with gene expression data analyses, and Dr. Vasuprada Iyengar for editing. The authors disclose receipt of the following financial support for conduct of this research, its authorship, and publication. This work was supported by the European Union (EU ERC Advanced grant ‘Zf BrainReg’ to Michael B, German Research Association (DFG) Cluster of Excellence 168, Centre for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (www.crt-dresden.de) and the Collaborative Research Grant (SFB 655, Project B2 to MB and CW).

Author information

Guruchandar Arulmozhivarman, Martin Kräter, Malte von Bonin and Martin Bornhäuser contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

Department of Hematology/Oncology, Medical Clinic and Policlinic I, University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
Guruchandar Arulmozhivarman, Martin Kräter, Manja Wobus, Katrin Müller, Katrin Lambert, Jochen Hampe, Friedrich Stölzel, Malte von Bonin & Martin Bornhäuser
Institute of Biofunctional Polymer Materials, Leibniz Institute for Polymer Research, Max Bergmann Center of Biomaterials, Dresden, Germany
Jens Friedrichs
German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
Elham Pishali Bejestani & Malte von Bonin
German Consortium for Translational Cancer Research (DKTK), partner site, Dresden, Germany
Elham Pishali Bejestani & Malte von Bonin
Deep Sequencing Group SFB655, Biotechnology Center, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Dimitra Alexopoulou & Andreas Dahl
Max-Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Dresden, Germany
Martin Stöter & Marc Bickle
Department of Hematology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg, Essen, Germany
Nona Shayegi
DFG-Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden (CRTD) – Cluster of Excellence, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany
Michael Brand & Martin Bornhäuser

Authors

Guruchandar Arulmozhivarman
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Martin Kräter
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Manja Wobus
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jens Friedrichs
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Elham Pishali Bejestani
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Katrin Müller
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Katrin Lambert
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Dimitra Alexopoulou
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Andreas Dahl
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Martin Stöter
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Marc Bickle
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Nona Shayegi
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jochen Hampe
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Friedrich Stölzel
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Michael Brand
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Malte von Bonin
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Martin Bornhäuser
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

G.A., M.K., M.v.B. and M.Bo. designed the project outline d and carried out most experiments, interpreted results and co-wrote the manuscript. M.W. provided reagents and supported study design and interpretation. J.F. conducted and performed atomic force microscopy-based single-cell force spectroscopy experiments and analyzed data. K.M. performed and analyzed colony-forming cell and cobblestone area-forming cell assays. K.L. performed adult zebrafish kidney marrow transplantation. D.A. and A.D. were responsible for mRNA-sequencing and bioinformatics analysis. M.S. and M.Bi. supported and performed the chemical screen in transgenic zebrafish embryos. E.P.B. provided intellectual contributions, interpreted results and assisted with animal experiments. J.H., N.S. and F.S. and M.Br. were involved in study design and interpreted results.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Michael Brand or Martin Bornhäuser.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arulmozhivarman, G., Kräter, M., Wobus, M. et al. Zebrafish In-Vivo Screening for Compounds Amplifying Hematopoietic Stem and Progenitor Cells: - Preclinical Validation in Human CD34+ Stem and Progenitor Cells. Sci Rep 7, 12084 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12360-0

Download citation

Received: 18 April 2017
Accepted: 08 September 2017
Published: 21 September 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12360-0

This article is cited by

Epigenetic and Epitranscriptomic Factors Make a Mark on Hematopoietic Stem Cell Development
- Dionna M. Kasper
- Stefania Nicoli
Current Stem Cell Reports (2018)

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.