Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Fast Fourier single-pixel imaging via binary illumination

Abstract

Fourier single-pixel imaging (FSI) employs Fourier basis patterns for encoding spatial information and is capable of reconstructing high-quality two-dimensional and three-dimensional images. Fourier-domain sparsity in natural scenes allows FSI to recover sharp images from undersampled data. The original FSI demonstration, however, requires grayscale Fourier basis patterns for illumination. This requirement imposes a limitation on the imaging speed as digital micro-mirror devices (DMDs) generate grayscale patterns at a low refreshing rate. In this paper, we report a new strategy to increase the speed of FSI by two orders of magnitude. In this strategy, we binarize the Fourier basis patterns based on upsampling and error diffusion dithering. We demonstrate a 20,000 Hz projection rate using a DMD and capture 256-by-256-pixel dynamic scenes at a speed of 10 frames per second. The reported technique substantially accelerates image acquisition speed of FSI. It may find broad imaging applications at wavebands that are not accessible using conventional two-dimensional image sensors.

Introduction

Single-pixel imaging1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31 is a computational imaging scheme that allows an image to be captured using a detector without spatial resolution. Different from conventional single-shot imaging scheme, single-pixel imaging reconstructs the image computationally with multiple measurements. Early single-pixel imaging techniques perform raster scanning in the spatial domain to acquire the spatial information of objects. Laser confocal scanning microscopy1, optical coherence tomography2, ultrasonic endoscope3, and scanning electron microscopy4 are examples of single-pixel imaging which perform raster scanning in the spatial domain. Contemporary single-pixel imaging implementation employs spatial light modulators (SLMs) to generate intensity patterns for illumination. It shares its roots with ghost imaging5,6,7,8,9,10, which was initially considered as a quantum effect5 and later was implemented using a classical source6. Computational ghost imaging7,8,9,10 used an SLM to generate structured illumination and a single-pixel detector to capture the back-scattered light intensity which carries the spatial information of the scene. There are two types of single-pixel imaging configuration. The first one is passive single-pixel imaging which uses an SLM to control detection light fields. The other one is active single-pixel imaging which uses an SLM to control illumination light fields. Interestingly, active single-pixel imaging techniques are subject to Helmholtz reciprocity32. Consequently, the field of view is determined by the illumination unit while the shading profile is set by the detection unit. The scheme of single-pixel imaging allows one to build an imaging system with high signal-to-noise ratio, wide spectral range, and low cost in terms of detection units. Therefore, single-pixel imaging has attracted considerable attentions and been applied in terahertz imaging11,12, three-dimensional (3-D) imaging13,14,15,16,17,18, multispectral or hyperspectral imaging19,20, microcopy21,22,23, optical encryption24, imaging through turbid media25, remote sensing26,27, etc.

Mathematically, active single-pixel imaging reconstructs the image of an object by obtaining the inner products of the pixelated reflectivity distribution of the object with the illumination patterns. As single-pixel detectors give a single value in each measurement, single-pixel systems typically need to take a number of measurements for obtaining sufficient spatial information for reconstructing a sharp image. Single-pixel imaging, therefore, is essentially a time-multiplexed technique and the temporal resolution imposes a limit for many imaging applications. The acquisition time t A depends on both the number of measurements M and the measurement rate R: t A  = M/R. To reduce the acquisition time, one can increase the measurement rate and reduce the number of measurements. The measurement rate R of a single-pixel imaging system is mainly determined by the illumination patterns generation rate. The latest digital micro-mirror devices (DMDs) are able to generate ~20,000 binary patterns per second. DMDs are much faster than conventional SLMs such as liquid crystal displays. Multiplexing techniques28 promise further acceleration but are at the expense of additional devices. Therefore, the straightforward solution is to maximize the pattern illumination rate given by the utilized DMD. The number of measurements needed mainly depends on the number of effective reconstructed pixels. The utilization of generic compressive sensing (CS) algorithms11,12,14,29 or the prior knowledge of object images allows reduction of the number of measurements. However, CS algorithms are generally computationally exhausted and cannot be implemented in real time.

For single-pixel imaging, both high image reconstruction quality and short image acquisition time are desirable. Recently, a single-pixel imaging technique, termed Fourier single-pixel imaging (FSI), was reported for producing high-quality two-dimensional (2-D)30 and 3-D images17. This technique uses grayscale Fourier basis patterns for illumination and acquires the Fourier spectrum of the object image. The speed of this technique is limited by the grayscale-pattern-generating rate of the employed DMD. Since DMDs generate each grayscale pattern by switching multiple binary patterns sequentially, the original FSI technique is inherently slow and it is challenging to apply it in high-speed imaging systems. On the contrary, Hadamard single-pixel imaging15,19,29,31 is well compatible with DMDs because of the binarized nature of the Hadamard basis patterns. Thus, it is relatively easy to achieve real-time single-pixel imaging using Hadamard patterns and impressive results have been reported in the past years. Recently, we compare the performances of Hadamard single-pixel imaging and Fourier single-pixel imaging with theoretical analysis and experiments32. The results show that Fourier single-pixel is more efficient than Hadamard single-pixel imaging in terms of the number of measurements. Therefore, it is also essential to adapt the original Fourier single-pixel imaging to a DMD-based imaging system so that high-quality and fast single-pixel imaging can be achieved.

In this paper, we convert the Fourier basis patterns from grayscale to binary by using the Floyd-Steinberg error diffusion dithering method33. The binarized Fourier basis patterns allow us to utilize high-speed binary modulation provided by the DMDs. Furthermore, we substitute the four-step phase-shift algorithm with the three-step phase-shifting algorithm34,35,36,37,38 to reduce the number of the total measurements. In particular, we demonstrate a 20,000 Hz projection rate for FSI and capture 256 × 256-pixel dynamic scenes at a speed of 10 frames per second. The reported technique enables high-quality and high-speed imaging via single-pixel detectors. It may find broad imaging applications at wavebands that are not accessible for conventional 2-D image sensors.

Method

The original FSI uses grayscale Fourier basis patterns for illumination. The intensity of each pattern is sinusoidal. Each Fourier basis pattern is characterized by its spatial frequency pair (f x , f y ) and its initial phase ϕ:

$${P}_{\varphi }(x,y)=a+b\cdot \,\cos (2\pi {f}_{x}x+2\pi {f}_{y}y+\varphi ),$$
(1)

where (x, y) is 2-D Cartesian coordinates, a is the average intensity of the pattern, and b is the modulation depth. A typical FSI system uses a DMD for generating greyscale illumination patterns. DMDs have millions of mirrors and each mirror has only two states (‘ON’ and ‘OFF’). When a mirror is ‘ON’, it reflects the light towards the object to be illuminated; when the mirror is ‘OFF’, it reflects the light towards the other direction. Each mirror can be individually controlled and switch between the two states. Therefore, DMDs can generate various different binary (black-and-white) patterns, but can’t generate grayscale patterns directly. As shown in Fig. 1(a), to generate a grayscale pattern, DMD-based systems are designed to decompose each grayscale pattern into a sequence of binary patterns (also known as bitplanes). For example, a grayscale pattern with 256 gray levels (8-bit image) will be decomposed into 8 binary patterns (1-bit images). The resultant binary patterns are then displayed on the DMD sequentially in a predefined amount of time. As the time for displaying each binary pattern is very short, the quick switching of binary patterns visually results in a grayscale pattern. Each pixel’s intensity in the grayscale pattern is the temporally weighted (by the predefined amount of time) mean of the intensities of the 8 binary patterns at the same pixel. Such a scheme is termed temporal dithering. It can be seen that Fourier basis patterns generation via temporal dithering is at the expense of time (or temporal resolution). Even state-of-the-art DMDs can only generate 8-bit grayscale patterns at a rate of ~250 Hz which is far lower than the rate (~20,000 Hz) of binary patterns. Therefore, the original FSI is difficult to be applied for high-speed imaging even by using a high-speed DMD.

Figure 1
figure 1

Fourier basis patterns generation by (a) temporal dithering and (b) spatial dithering.

In order to achieve high-speed Fourier basis patterns generation using a DMD, we propose to employ image upsampling and Floyd-Steinberg error diffusion dithering method to generate binary Fourier basis patterns. With the generated binary patterns, we can make full use of the maximum illumination rate allowed by a DMD. To reconstruct an image with N × N pixels in Fig. 1(b), we first generate a complete set of grayscale Fourier basis patterns. The image resolution of each basis pattern is N × N pixels. We then apply upsampling to the grayscale patterns using the ‘bicubic’ image interpolation algorithm. The size of the upsampled patterns is kN × kN pixels. As such, each pixel in the original pattern will be represented by k × k pixels in the upsampled pattern. In other words, the upsampled pattern consists of N × N super pixels and each super pixel consists of k × k regular pixels, similar to k × k pixels binning31. Finally, we perform the error diffusion based dithering to the upsampled pattern and generate the binarized Fourier basis patterns.

Binarization causes quantization errors to every single pixel. The errors can be positive or negative. Error diffusion dithering spreads (adds) the residual quantization error of a pixel onto its neighboring pixels. If the quantization errors of a number of pixels are negative, the quantization error of the next pixel become more likely to be positive. As such, the average quantization error in a local area is close to zero. In our approach, we use higher-resolution illumination patterns (kN × kN pixels) to reconstruct a lower-resolution image (N × N pixels), the image reconstruction process implies a k-fold downsampling. As such, the quantization errors of every single pixel in the reconstructed image are averaged by k × k pixels. A larger k leads to smaller quantization errors and larger pixel size for each super pixel. However, larger super pixel results in lower achievable spatial resolution. It can be seen that Fourier basis patterns generation via the proposed spatial dithering is at the expense of spatial resolution. As spatial dithering is a nonlinear process, we have difficulties in giving a close-form expression. Instead, we will present numerical simulations in the following section to demonstrate that the combination of error diffusion dithering and image upsampling can eliminate the undesired quantization errors and achieve high-quality reconstructions.

In order to further speed up data acquisition process, we employ three-step phase-shifting illumination to reduce the number of measurements M. Three-step phase-shifting algorithm is widely used in fringe analysis34,35,36, optical sectioning37, and structured illumination microscopy38. Here we employ the three-step phase-shifting algorithm in Fourier coefficients acquisition. Fourier basis patterns with different spatial frequency pairs are generated according to Eq. (1). Each spatial frequency pair (f x , f y ) corresponds to three different initial phases (ϕ = 0, 2π/3 and 4π/3 rad). As such, each complex-valued Fourier coefficient Ĩ can be obtained by illuminating three patterns and using the three corresponding responses (D 0, D 2π/3 and D 4π/3) for calculation:

$$\tilde{I}({f}_{x},{f}_{y})=[2{D}_{0}({f}_{x},{f}_{y})-{D}_{2\pi /3}({f}_{x},{f}_{y})-{D}_{4\pi /3}({f}_{x},{f}_{y})]+\sqrt{3}{\rm{j}}\cdot [{D}_{2\pi /3}({f}_{x},{f}_{y})-{D}_{4\pi /3}({f}_{x},{f}_{y})].$$
(2)

The number of Fourier coefficients in Fourier domain is the same as the number of image pixels in spatial domain. Each Fourier coefficient is complex-valued. As the Fourier spectrum of a natural (real-valued) image is conjugate symmetric, we can obtain a pair of conjugate symmetric Fourier coefficients [Ĩ(f x , f y ) and Ĩ(−f x , −f y )] with 3 measurements. Consequently, fully sampling an N × N-pixel object image consumes 1.5N 2 (=N × N × 3/2) measurements.

Results

Numerical simulations

In the first simulation, we explore different binarization methods that are used in Fourier basis patterns binarization. The binarization methods in comparison are (1) the fixed thresholding method, (2) Otsu’s thresholding, (3) random dithering, (4) Bayer’s ordered dithering, and (5) the Floyd-Steinberg error diffusion dithering. An image with 512 × 512 pixels is used as the original object image. In order to reconstruct a 256 × 256-pixel image, the Fourier basis patterns P(x, y) are generated according to Equation (1) where a = 0.5, b = 0.5, and spatial frequencies, f x , f y , range from 0, 1/256, 2/256, …, 255/256. The basis patterns are first upsampled with a ratio k = 2 using the ‘bicubic’ image interpolation algorithm and then binarized. The resultant responses of single-pixel detector, D ϕ , are simulated by

$${D}_{\varphi }=\sum _{x}\sum _{y}P(x,y)\cdot I(x,y),$$
(3)

where P(x, y) denotes a binarized Fourier basis pattern and I(x,y) is the object image. The Fourier spectrum of the image to be reconstructed is obtained according to Eq. (2). The final image is reconstructed by applying an inverse fast 2-D Fourier transform. To quantitatively evaluate the quality of reconstructions, we use peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and root mean square error (RMSE). Figure 2 shows the reconstructed Fourier spectra and images for different binarization methods. The result for the Steinberg-Floyd error diffusion dithering is clear without noticeable artifacts, much better than the results by the rest four methods in terms of reconstruction quality. The reconstructions by the other four binarization methods are drenched in noise and artifacts. The noise and artifacts are due to quantization errors caused by binarization. The results demonstrate that the spatial dithering is able to effectively eliminate quantization errors and produce high-quality reconstructions.

Figure 2
figure 2

Reconstructed Fourier spectra and images for different binarization methods using the upsampling ratio k = 2: (a) fixed thresholding, (b) Otsu’s thresholding, (c) random dithering, (d) Bayer’s ordered dithering, and (e) Floyd-Steinberg error diffusion dithering.

Without loss of generality, we also use 10 standard images from a public image database for testing39. We present the mean quality of the 10 reconstructed images for different binarization methods in Table 1.

Table 1 Quality of reconstructed images for different binarization methods.

In the second simulation, we test the influence of the upsampling ratio k on the quality of final reconstruction. The resolution of the basis patterns used in this simulation is (512/k) × (512/k) pixels so that the resolution of upsampled basis patterns is the same as that of the object image. The resolution of the reconstructed image is also (512/k) × (512/k) pixels, the same as that of the original basis pattern. The greyscale basis patterns are first upsampled using the ‘bicubic’ interpolation (with k = 1, 2, 4, and 8) and then binarized using Floyd-Steinberg error diffusion dithering. The simulation results are presented in Table 2 and Fig. 3.

Table 2 The quality of reconstructed images different upsampling ratios.
Figure 3
figure 3

Simulation results with different upsampling ratios: (a) k = 1, (b) k = 2, (c) k = 4, and (d) k = 8.

The results demonstrate that larger sampling ratio k enables better performance in quantization errors elimination and therefore better reconstruction quality. As evidenced by Table 2 and Fig. 3, the quality of reconstruction improves remarkably when the value of k increases from 1 to 2, but improves slightly when k is larger than 2. On the other hand, the spatial resolution decreases as k increases. It turns out that there is a tradeoff between errors and resolution, and k = 2 is the ‘sweet point’ for this tradeoff.

Experimental set-up

The experimental set-up is shown in Fig. 4. The set-up consists of an illumination system, a detection system, and an object. The illumination system consists of a Texas Instruments DLP Discovery 4100 development kit, a lens system, and a 3-watt white LED. The DLP development kit is equipped with a 0.7-inch DMD which has 1024 × 768 micro mirrors. Each mirror is 13.6 × 13.6 μm2 in size. The LED continuously emits uniform light fields towards the mirror. With the mirror, light fields are reflected onto the DMD, then modulated by the DMD, and finally reflected onto the object. We make up a complex scene where a piece of A4 paper with a printed enlarged 1951 USAF resolution test pattern is used as the background. Through the lens system, clear illumination patterns are formed on the object surface. Note that the lens system is simply removed from a commercial digital projector (TOSHIBA T-90). The illumination light fields are scattered by the object and the resulting scattered light fields are collected by the detection system. The detection system consists of a photomultipliers tube (Thorlabs PMM01) which is used as a single-pixel detector, a collecting lens, a piece of ground glass, a custom amplification circuit, a data acquisition board [National Instruments USB-6343 (BNC)], and a computer. The maximum rate for analog input of the data acquisition board (DAQ) is 500,000 samples per second.

Figure 4
figure 4

Experimental set-up.

Static imaging results

We employ three-step phase-shifting binary FSI to reconstruct a 256 × 256-pixel image of the object. The sampling ratio is 100%. As such, 256 × 256 complex-valued Fourier coefficients are to be sampled. We firstly generate a complete set of grayscale Fourier basis patterns. The number of patterns is 98,304 (=256 × 256 × 3/2). The division of 2 is for conjugate symmetry of the Fourier spectrum of real-value image. The image resolution of each pattern is 256 × 256 pixels. We then upsample the basis patterns by using ‘bicubic’ image interpolation algorithm with upsampling ratio k = 2 so that each upsampled pattern is represented by 512 × 512 pixels. Floyd-Steinberg error diffusion dithering is applied to all the patterns. For perfect reconstruction, the Fourier spectrum is fully sampled by projecting all patterns.

Figure 5 shows the sampled Fourier spectra and the corresponding reconstructed images for different illumination rates: 250 Hz, 2,000 Hz, and 20,000 Hz. The illumination rate refers to the number of patterns projected onto the object per second by the DMD. The corresponding spatial information acquisition time is 394 seconds, 50 seconds, and 5 seconds, respectively. Figure 5(b) shows the reconstructed image for 250 Hz. The reconstruction is of high quality, for it presents fine details of the object and has not noticeable noise or artifacts. This high-quality reconstruction is due to the DMD operating at a relatively slow mode and resultant long acquisition time. As the utilized DAQ operates at the rate of 500,000 samples per second and the DMD operates at 250 Hz, the DAQ collects 2,000 samples for each illumination pattern. The number of samples is so large that random noise can be well evened out. Figure 5(d) shows the result for the illumination rate of 2,000 Hz. Although the illumination rate is 8-fold of the maximum rate for 8-bit grayscale patterns illumination, the reconstructed image is still visually as good as that acquired at 250 Hz. This result demonstrates that the proposed technique is capable of high-quality static imaging with an illumination rate higher than 250 Hz, the maximum rate for 8-bit grayscale patterns illumination allowed by the DMD. Figure 5(f) shows the reconstructed image for illumination rate of 20,000 Hz, the maximum allowable illumination rate for binary patterns. Although noticeable noise is presented in the reconstructed image, the quality is acceptable. When the DMD operates at 20, 000 Hz, there are only 25 samples that the DAQ can detect for each illumination pattern. In other words, the data acquisition rate of the utilized DAQ relatively low. We believe that the quality of reconstruction for 20,000 Hz might be improved by using a more advanced DAQ.

Figure 5
figure 5

Static imaging for different illumination rates. The resolution of the reconstructed images is (a) Fourier spectrum sampled at illumination rate of 250 Hz and (b) corresponding reconstructed image; (c) and (d) at illumination rate of 2,000 Hz; (e) and (f) at illumination rate of 20,000 Hz. Note that we show the absolute value of the Fourier spectra on a logarithm scale to render them visible. No post processing has been applied to all reconstructed images. Scale bar = 2 cm.

Dynamic imaging results

We finally apply the proposed technique for imaging dynamic scenes. In this experiment, the DMD operates at the maximum modulation rate of 20,000 Hz. Our aim is to capture a dynamic scene with 10 frames per second. The resolution is 256 × 256 pixels. To reduce the number of measurements, we utilize the prior that most spatial information of natural images is concentrated at the low spatial frequencies range in the Fourier domain. We perform sub-Nyquist sampling in image acquisition, acquiring only 1,332 coefficients (666 coefficient pairs, each of which takes 3 measurements) in the low-frequency range of the Fourier domain along a spiral path for each image (the detailed sampling strategy is described in refs30,40). Thus, each image takes 1,998 measurements, which allows us to capture ~10 images per second. The sampling ratio is ~2% (=1332/2562). We generate 1,998 binary Fourier basis patterns whose original resolution is 256 × 256 effective pixels, using k = 2 for upsampling and Floyd-Steinberg’s method for dithering. We capture 167 images and reconstruct a ~17-second video (see Supplementary Video 1). The video is created from the sequence of reconstructed images and the playback frame rate is set to be 10. No post-processing has been applied to the reconstructed images and the video. Although the ringing effect and motion blur are noticeable, some details in the reconstruction, the popping veins at the back of the human hand (see Fig. 6(a–c)) for example, are still well presented. The quality can be improved by utilizing the inter-frame redundancy or employing deconvolution as post processing.

Figure 6
figure 6

Dynamic imaging results. (a) to (h) show 8 of 167 images reconstructed. No post-processing has been applied to the reconstructed images. See Supplementary Video 1 for the complete video.

Discussion

We report a fast imaging technique that jointly employs image upsampling and an error diffusion dithering method to generate binary Fourier basis patterns for illumination. This strategy has two advantages. First, the illumination rate is two orders of magnitude higher than that of the original greyscale implementation (80-fold, 20,000 Hz achieved in our experiments, 250 Hz allowed by the DMD in 8-bit mode). Second, the binary patterns are free from gamma distortion (nonlinearity of gray levels). This strategy also has the two disadvantages. First, dithering causes quantization errors. Even the utilization of error diffusion dithering cannot perfectly eliminate the errors. We experimentally demonstrate that noises due to quantization errors are barely noticeable in the final reconstruction with the combination of the Floyd-Steinberg error diffusion dithering and 2-fold upsampling. Second, high-speed binary Fourier basis patterns generation is at the expense of spatial resolution. Defocusing technique might make the binary Fourier basis patterns more sinusoidal. However, defocusing also lead to the loss of high-frequency information of the illumination patterns.

We employ the three-step phase-shifting algorithm which brings an advantage of 25% fewer measurements than the four-step phase-shifting algorithm used in our previously proposed technique17,30. In principle, the two-step phase-shifting (π-shift) algorithm is able to acquire the complete Fourier spectrum of an image with as many measurements as the reconstructed pixels. In practice, however, the two-step phase-shifting algorithm is a direct method of measurement and therefore more sensitive to noise than the three-step phase-shifting and four-step phase-shifting algorithms.

The achievable highest acquisition rate depends on the rate of the utilized DMD, the response of the utilized detector and the sampling rate of the utilized DAQ. Higher acquisition rate might ease motion blur in dynamic imaging. However, higher acquisition rate leads to fewer photons detected and lower SNR, which would result in degeneration of quality. Thus, there is a tradeoff between speed and quality.

Adaptively sampling the most important (of largest modulus) Fourier coefficients would make the image acquisition process more efficient. The use of advanced sampling strategies41,42 in Fourier coefficients acquisition might allow further reduction of measurements. The proposed technique can also potentially be combined with the 3-D FSI technique17 to achieve real-time 3-D single-pixel imaging.

In conclusion, we successfully accelerate the FSI using binary patterns for illumination and develop a fast DMD-based single-pixel imaging system. We demonstrate a 20,000 Hz projection rate using the DMDs and capture 256 × 256-pixel dynamic scenes at a speed of 10 frames per second. The reported technique enables high-quality and high-speed imaging via single-pixel detectors. It may find broad imaging applications at wavebands that are not accessible using conventional 2-D image sensors.

References

  1. Webb, R. H. Confocal optical microscopy. Rep. Prog. Phys. 59(3), 427–471 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang, D. et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science 254(5035), 1178–1181 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Dimagno, E. et al. Ultrasonic endoscope. Lancet 1(8169), 629–631 (1980).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Oatley, C. W., Nixon, W. C. & Pease, R. F. W. Scanning electron microscopy. Adv. Electron El. Phys. 21, 181–247 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Pittman, T. B., Shih, Y. H., Strekalov, D. V. & Sergienko, A. V. Optical imaging by means of two-photon quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 52, R3429 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bennink, R. S., Bentley, S. J. & Boyd, R. W. ‘Two-Photon’ coincidence imaging with a classical source. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 113601 (2002).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shapiro, J. H. Computational ghost imaging. Phys. Rev. A. 78, 061802 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferri, F., Magatti, D., Lugiato, L. A. & Gatti, A. Differential ghost imaging. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104(25), 253603 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sun, B., Welsh, S. S., Edgar, M. P., Shapiro, J. H. & Padgett, M. J. Normalized ghost imaging. Opt. Express. 20(15), 16892–16901 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Welsh, S. S. et al. Fast full-color computational imaging with single-pixel detectors. Opt. Express. 21(20), 23068–23074 (2013).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chan, W. L. et al. A single-pixel terahertz imaging system based on compressed sensing. Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 121105 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Watts, C. M. et al. Terahertz compressive imaging with metamaterial spatial light modulators. Nat. Photonics 8, 605–609 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sun, B. et al. 3-D Computational imaging with single-pixel detectors. Science 340, 844–847 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Howland, G. A., Lum, D. J., Ware, M. R. & Howell, J. C. Photon counting compressive depth mapping. Opt. Express 21, 23822–23837 (2013).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, Y. et al. 3D single-pixel video. J. Opt. 18, 035203 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gong, W. et al. Three-dimensional ghost imaging lidar via sparsity constraint. Sci. Rep. 6, 26133 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, Z. & Zhong, J. Three-dimensional single-pixel imaging with far fewer measurements than effective image pixels. Opt. Lett. 41(11), 2497–2500 (2016).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, M. J. et al. Single-pixel three-dimensional imaging with time-based depth resolution. Nat. Commun 7, 12010 (2016).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Edgar, M. P. et al. Simultaneous real-time visible and infrared video with single-pixel detectors. Sci. Rep. 5, 10669 (2015).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Bian, L. et al. Multispectral imaging using a single bucket detector. Sci. Rep. 6, 24752 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Guo, K., Jiang, S. & Zheng, G. Multilayer fluorescence imaging on a single-pixel detector. Biomed. Opt. Express 7(7), 2425–2431 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodríguez, A. D., Clemente, P., Tajahuerce, E. & Lancis, J. Dual-mode optical microscope based on single-pixel imaging. Optics and Lasers in Engineering 82, 87–94 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Field, J. J., Winters, D. G. & Bartels, R. A. Single-pixel fluorescent imaging with temporally labeled illumination patterns. Optica 3(9), 971–974 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Clemente, P., Durán, V., Tajahuerce, E. & Lancis, J. Optical encryption based on computational ghost imaging. Opt. Lett. 35, 2391–2393 (2010).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tajahuerce, E. et al. Image transmission through dynamic scattering media by single-pixel photodetection. Opt. Express 22, 16945–16955 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ma, J. Single-pixel remote sensing. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 6(2), 199–203 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ma, J. A single-pixel imaging system for remote sensing by two-step iterative curvelet thresholding. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 6(4), 676–680 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Welsh, S. S., Edgar, M. P., Bowman, R., Sun, B. & Padgett, M. J. Near video-rate linear Stokes imaging with single-pixel detectors. J. Opt. 17, 025705 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Duarte, M. F. et al. Single-pixel imaging via compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 25, 83 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, Z., Ma, X. & Zhong, J. Single-pixel imaging by means of Fourier spectrum acquisition. Nat. Commun. 6, 6225 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sun, M. J., Edgar, M. P., Phillips, D. B., Gibson, G. M. & Padgett, M. J. Improving the signal-to-noise ratio of single-pixel imaging using digital microscanning. Opt. Express 24(10), 10476–10485 (2016).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Zheng, G. & Zhong, J. Hadamard single-pixel imaging versus Fourier single-pixel imaging. Optics Express 25(16), 19619–19639 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Floyd, R. & Steinberg, L. An adaptive algorithm for spatial grey scale. Proc. Soc. Inf. Display 17, 75–77 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, Y. & Zhang, S. Three-dimensional shape measurement with binary dithered patterns. Appl. Opt. 27, 6631–6636 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang, P. S. & Zhang, S. Fast three-step phase-shifting algorithm. Appl. Opt. 45(21), 5086–5091 (2006).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Creath, K. Phase-measurement interferometry techniques. Progress in optics 26, 349–393 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Neil, M. A., Juškaitis, R. & Wilson, T. Method of obtaining optical sectioning by using structured light in a conventional microscope. Opt. Lett. 22(24), 1905–1907 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gustafsson, M. G. L. Surpassing the lateral resolution limit by a factor of two using structured illumination microscopy. Journal of microscopy 198(2), 82–87 (2000).

  39. http://www.imageprocessingplace.com/.

  40. Born, M. & Wolf, E. Principles of optics: electromagnetic theory of propagation, interference and diffraction of light. Pergamon Press, Cambridge (1959).

  41. Bian, L. et al. Content adaptive illumination for Fourier ptychography. Opt. Lett. 39(23), 6648–6651 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bian, L., Suo, J., Hu, X., Chen, F. & Dai, Q. Efficient single pixel imaging in Fourier space. J. Opt. 18(8), 085704 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (61475064). The authors thank Dr. Shiping Li for her help with the experimental equipment preparation, Bingyong Huang for his help with the custom circuit design, You Zhou for writing assistance, and Qinqiu Fang for linguistic assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Z.Z. designed the system, performed the experiments, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. X.W. performed the experiments and analysed the data. G.Z. analysed the data and assisted in writing the manuscript. J.Z. conceived, designed, supervised the study, interpreted the data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jingang Zhong.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Wang, X., Zheng, G. et al. Fast Fourier single-pixel imaging via binary illumination. Sci Rep 7, 12029 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12228-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12228-3

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing