Selective uptake of epidermal growth factor-conjugated gold nanoparticle (EGF-GNP) facilitates non-thermal plasma (NTP)-mediated cell death


Non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma (NTP) has been shown to induce cell death in various mammalian cancer cells. Accumulated evidence also shows that NTP could be clinically used in cancer therapy. However, the current NTP-based applications lack target specificity. Here, a novel method in NTP-mediated cancer therapeutics was described with enhanced target specificity by treating EGF (epidermal growth factor)-conjugated GNP (gold nanoparticle). The treatment with EGF-conjugated GNP complex, followed by NTP irradiation showed selective apoptosis of cells having receptor-mediated endocytosis. NTP triggered γ–H2AX elevation which is a typical response elicited by DNA damage. These results suggest that EGF-conjugated GNP functions as an important adjuvant which gives target specificity in applications of conventional plasma therapy.


Apoptosis is programmed and orchestrated cell death, and its primary role is to keep cell number homeostasis in multicellular organisms1,2,3,4. Apoptosis is not only important in normal embryonic development such as limb morphogenesis5, but also important in targeting of naturally occurring malignant cells6. Therefore many researchers tried to elicit apoptotic cell death in cancer cells with various strategies such as tubulin blockers or DNA damage-eliciting chemicals7. Additional specificity was conferred by using target-specific small molecule inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and nucleotides8, 9.

Added to these conventional cancer therapies, Fridman G et al. described “plasma medicine” that uses non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma (NTP) to effectively remove cancer cells as well as to sterilize non-living objects10. NTP induced significant changes in mammalian cells including surface detachment of CHO-K1 and loss of cell-cell interaction11. NTP also induced DNA damage, followed by apoptotic cell death12, 13. Generation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species are often attributed to the apoptotic responses of the NTP treatment14, but the detailed mechanism is still largely unknown. One of the important characteristics of the NTP is caner-cell specific cytotoxicity15. A recent report focused on cytotoxicity of NTP on p53-mutated cells, implying that cancer-specific genetic alterations might be responsible for the preferential cytotoxicity16. However, the detailed mechanism for this still awaits extensive studies.

Nanotechnology-coupled cancer therapy has also important roles in this field17. Injection of gold nanoparticle (GNP) into mice with xenografted EMT-6 mammary carcinoma cells, followed by x-ray therapies showed a significant delay in tumor growth18. Particularly, synergistic combination of GNP and NTP showed potential in improving cancer therapy19, 20. For target specificity, Kim et al. also showed that GNP-conjugated antibody against FAK (Focal adhesion kinase) protein effectively targets tumor and increases cell death after NTP irradiation21.

Since the EGFR (EGF Receptor) is a strong prognostic indicator in human epithelial cancers22, we prepared epidermal growth factor (EGF)-conjugated GNP and treated this to cancer cells which express a high level of EGFR. Here, we report that selective uptake of EGF-GNP complex, followed by NTP treatment efficiently triggered apoptosis. We observed receptor-mediated endocytosis of the complex. Treatment with NTP also induced a significant increase in apoptosis in the EGF-conjugated GNP complex-treated cells. Taken together, we suggest that the EGF-conjugated GNP complex coupled with NTP treatment efficiently targets EGFR-expressing cancer cells.


Development of nonthermal air plasma (NTP)-generating device for cell treatment

To address the specific and differential effect of NTP on GNP-treated cells, we devised a NTP-irradiating system as we previously described12. Figure 1A shows a schematic diagram of the originally devised plasma irradiation system. Atmospheric pressure surface-type plasma source was developed to cover and treat whole target area. A polytetrafluorethylene (PTFE) dielectric (εr = 2.2, 750 μm thickness) with Cu electrode (35 μm thickness) on both sides was employed to manufacture the plasma source. The plasma source based on the device reported by Kim et al.12, had 3.3 cm by 3.3 cm striped mask pattern, and the pattern was engraved by a conventional etching method (Fig. 1B left panel). High voltage electrode on the back side of the plasma source was connected to a power source (15 kV maximum voltages, 22 kHz) through 33 k resistor. The striped electrode on the front side was grounded, and directed towards the sample. Micro-size filamentary discharge was generated and distributed uniformly around the grounded electrode (Fig. 1B right panel). The plasma source operated with voltages ranged from 2.5 kV to 3.2 kV magnitudes in ambient air, atmospheric pressure. The breakdown voltage of the plasma source was approximately 2 kV and the intensity of plasma was proportional to voltage. The temperature was measured at 10 mm distance from the plasma source, which was the same distance with the location of the cells. The maximum temperature was ~38 °C at 3.2 kV after 60 seconds exposure, while the temperature rarely raised at 2.5 kV (Fig. 1C). Even if we chose various driving voltages ranging from 2.5 kV to 3.2 kV, there was a little change in temperature which does not exceed physiological condition. The result shows that our device generates stable and safe plasma that could be applied clinically with no damage to cells. Approximately 1,000 ppm of ozone was produced by the air plasma as previously reported12. The filamentary discharge was generated consuming 4.27 W and energy density of about 20 J/cm2 was estimated for the 30 seconds of treatment as per our previous result.

Figure 1

Development of nonthermal air plasma (NTP)-generating device for cell treatment. (A) The schematic diagram of the experimental setup. (B) The grounded electrode of the plasma source and light emission from the air plasma source. (C) The temperature measured at the plasma source of each driving voltage for 60 seconds.

A549, human lung carcinoma cell, expresses high level of EGFR

Mitogenic signal elicited by extracellular EGF (Epidermal Growth Factor) is one of the most prominent stimuli for cell proliferation. The signaling cascade passes through various proto-oncogenes containing EGF-responding receptor tyrosine kinases23. Particularly, ectopic expression of the EGF receptor (EGFR) on the cell surface is one of the main causes of carcinogenesis and the most well-known diagnostic marker for various malignant tumors24. Thus we determined to target EGFR-expressing cells by treating EGF-conjugated GNP since uptake of GNP was also known to induce apoptosis18, 21. To investigate the expression level of the EGFR in cancer cells, we performed Western blotting analysis of candidate cancer cells (Fig. 2A). We selected EGFR-positive cancer cell lines including A549 human lung carcinoma cell, DU145 human metastatic prostate cancer cell, HeLa human cervical carcinoma cell, HT29 human colorectal adenocarcinoma cell, SH-SY5Y human bone marrow neuroblastoma cell, and SK-OV(3) human ovarian carcinoma cell lines25,26,27,28,29. Among them, we selected the A549 non-small cell lung cancer fibroblast for further analyses because the cell showed the highest expression of the EGFR among the panel of the cancer cell lines. We also preferred the A549 cell line since the cell showed enhanced cytotoxicity in response to Cetuximab (C225)-conjugated gold nanoparticles in previous work30.

Figure 2

A549, human lung carcinoma cell, expresses a high level of EGFR. (A) A549, DU145, HeLa, HT29, SH-SY5Y, and SK-OV (3) cells were cultured and whole-cell extracts were analyzed by Western blotting for EGFR assessment. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as a loading control. (B) A549 cells were cultured in 35 mm2 dishes until 80~90% of confluency. NTP was generated at different voltages and cells were exposed for different time periods as indicated in the figure. Each value represents the mean ± S.D. of triplicate samples. (C) Trypan blue staining was performed to assess dead cell population after plasma treatment. Exposure time and condition are indicated in the figure.

We next treated the NTP to the A549 cell to assess responses of the cell and effect of the NTP. The higher voltage induced an increase in cytotoxicity in both MTT analysis and Trypan blue staining analysis in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2B and C). Taken together, the A549 cell expressing a high level of the EGFR was a proper model for our system to show apoptotic responses to the NTP.

Preparation of the Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF)-conjugated gold nanoparticle (GNP)

We proposed earlier that the NTP treatment with epidermal growth factor (EGF)-conjugated gold nanoparticle (GNP) could be a new approach in targeted cancer therapy. Thus we conjugated the EGF to the GNP with three different linkers; MPA (3-mercaptopropionic acid), MUA (11-mercaptoundecanoic acid), and MHDA (16-mercaptohexadecanoic acid) (Fig. 3A). Since propagation of EGF signaling activates extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs)31, 32, we examined level of the phosphorylated ERK in conjugates-treated cells to validate activity of the conjugates. Treatment with the EGF alone showed a significant increase of the phospho-ERK (Fig. 3B). The conjugated EGF with MUA and MHDA also showed significant elevation of the phospho-ERK, but MPA conjugation had no effect in the treated cells. The A549 cell was also stimulated by treatment with 1% BSA and 5 nm GNP even though the mechanism is not known. However, it was previously reported that nanoparticles trigger activation of MAPK signaling including ERK, p38, and JNK for proliferation or inflammation33. We also expect that treatment with 1% BSA induced activation of the ERK signaling since it is already known that serum albumin interacts with a lot of biomolecules34. We further examined the expression of NF-κB since the signaling is closely associated with proinflammatory responses35. As shown in Fig. 3B, expression of the NF-κB was significantly increased by the treatment with the EGF-GNP complexes conjugated with MUA and MHDA. Since both ERK and NF-κB signaling were activated by the treatment with EGF-MUA-GNP and EGF-MHDA-GNP, we chose MUA and MHDA linkers for our further studies.

Figure 3

Preparation of the Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) conjugated gold nanoparticle (GNP). (A) The experimental scheme shows conjugation between EGF and GNP. Three different linkers were used for conjugation; MPA (3-mercaptopropionic acid), MUA (11-mercaptoundecanoic acid), and MHDA (16-mercaptohexadecanoic acid) (B) Serum-starved (24 hours) A549 cells were treated with 1% BSA, EGF (100 μg/ml), 5 nm GNP, 5 nm GNP-MPA-EGF, 5 nm GNP-MUA-EGF, and 5 nm GNP-MHDA-EGF respectively. Whole-cell extracts were analyzed by Western blotting for assessment of the level of phospho-ERK protein. 14-3-3ξ was used as a loading control. Quantification of Western blots was performed with Image J. All density values were normalized with the loading control. (C) Whole-cell extracts were analyzed by dot blots. EGF antibody detected 5 nm GNP-MUA-EGF and 5 nm GNP-MHDA-EGF. The experiment was performed independently at least three times. (D) Serum-starved (24 hours) A549 cells were treated with 1% BSA, EGF (100 μg/ml), 5 nm GNP, 5 nm GNP-MUA-EGF, and 5 nm GNP-MHDA-EGF for 6 hours at 37 °C, respectively. MTT assay was performed to assess cell viability after incubation without plasma irradiation. (E) Serum-starved (24 hours) A549 cells were treated with EGF (100 μg/ml), 5 nm GNP, 5 nm GNP-MUA-EGF, and 5 nm GNP-MHDA-EGF, respectively. Cells were incubated at 37 °C or 29.5 °C for 6 hours. EGFR was stained with green fluorescent antibody, and DNA was stained with Hoechst 33342. The scale bar on each image represents 10 μm.

Dot botting analysis also showed that the conjugates were specifically recognized by the anti-EGF antibody (Fig. 3C). It is notable that we could not detect a significant amount of EGF staining when we treated cells with EGF alone. This might be due to internalized EGF was already degraded or was not persistent enough to trigger downstream signaling. This could be one of the reasons why the treatment with EGF could not induce NF-κB signaling although the level of the phospho-ERK was significantly increased (Fig. 3B). We expect that the GNP-conjugated EGF was retained more in the treated cells compared to unmodified EGF in transduction of downstream signaling.

We also assessed cell viability after the treatment with EGF-GNP conjugates without plasma irradiation (Fig. 3D). Treatment with EGF and GNP alone induced a subtle increase in cell viability, which might be triggered by the ERK signaling as we shown in Fig. 3B. The EGF-GNP conjugates also showed a subtle increase in cell viability, implying that upregulated NF-κB was not a key factor to elicit an apoptotic response without subsequent NTP irradiation.

It is well-established that the EGF triggers dimerization of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), followed by recruitment and activation of intracellular signal transducers such as proteins containing SH2 (src homology domain 2) or PTB (phosphotyrosine binding) domain36, 37. Ligand binding also triggers recruitment of the EGFR to clathrin-coated pits, and then the EGFR-ligand complex is internalized32. To examine that the EGF-conjugated GNPs move into the cell with the EGFR, we treated cells with the EGF-conjugated GNP and stained the EGFR protein (Fig. 3E). The result showed that the EGFR was internalized when we treated the cells with EGF or GNP-conjugated EGF at 37 °C. We also examined this at different temperature of 29.5 °C because receptor-mediated endocytosis is significantly affected by culture temperature38. Intracellular localization of the EGFR induced by the treatment with EGF or GNP-conjugated EGF was significantly diminished when we maintained the treated cells under 29.5 °C. The EGFR protein remained on the plasma membrane when the cells were treated with the GNP-conjugated EGF at low temperature. The result implies that the internalization of the conjugates might depend on the endocytotic pathway.

Treatment with EGF-conjugated GNPs enhanced apoptotic response by NTP irradiation

Since cell-adjacent GNPs induced enhanced apoptosis as we previously reported21, we hypothesized that the endocytosed GNP would also effectively kill the treated cells. Thus we next assessed viability of the NTP-irradiated cells under treatment with the EGF-conjugates. MTT analysis was performed to examine apoptotic response of the cells after plasma irradiation (Fig. 4A). NTP treatment induced apoptosis in 20% of treated cell population. Treatment with EGF and GNP alone showed no significant changes. However, treatment with the EGF-conjugated GNP, followed by the NTP irradiation significantly increased dead cell population. This result shows that the internalized GNP responded to the NTP and effectively killed the cells.

Figure 4

Treatment with EGF-conjugated GNPs enhanced apoptotic response by NTP irradiation. MTT assay shows cytotoxicity of NTP irradiation after GNP-EGF treatment. Serum-starved (24 hours) A549 cells were treated with EGF (100 μg/ml), 5 nm GNP, 5 nm GNP-MUA-EGF, and 5 nm GNP-MHDA-EGF for 6 hours at 37 °C, respectively. After NTP irradiation at 2.5 kV for 50 seconds, cells were incubated for 6 hours at 37 °C. (A) MTT assay was performed right after final incubation. Student t-test revealed significance. *p < 0.05 (B) Protein level of γ-H2AX was assessed by Western blotting after the GNP-EGF treatment, followed by NTP irradiation. 14-3-3ξ was used as a loading control. (C) TUNEL assay was performed to assess the cytotoxicity of NTP irradiation after GNP-EGF treatment.

We next examined if DNA damage was one of the causes for this response (Fig. 4B). We first analyzed expression of BAX (Bcl2-associated X protein) and p53 since they are well-known markers for apoptosis39. The protein level of BAX and p53 was significantly increased in the NTP-treated cell populations, suggesting that the treatment with the NTP induced mitochondria damage as we previously reported12. However, protein level of γ-H2AX was only significantly increased in cell populations treated with the GNP-EGF conjugates. The result suggests that DNA damage-dependent early apoptotic responses were elicited in the cells treated with GNP-EGF conjugate coupled with NTP. We further performed TUNEL assay to show that the treatment with the EGF-conjugated GNP facilitated NTP-induced cell death (Fig. 4C). Taken together, these data suggest that the EGF-conjugated GNP coupled with the NTP irradiation effectively induced apoptosis in the treated cells.


We hypothesized that receptor-mediated endocytosis of EGF-GNP conjugates could target EGFR-expressing cells and cause selective apoptosis by subsequent NTP irradiation. In this report, we have shown that our EGF-GNP conjugate elicited phosphorylation of ERK, suggesting that the complex is functional as a signaling mediator to stimulate EGFR. Internalization of the EGFR further suggested that gold nanoparticle internalized in the mammalian cell would effectively respond to NTP irradiation to increase apoptosis. We further showed that NTP irradiation coupled with EGF-GNP treatment triggered DNA damage response to induce cell death. Thus, we think that this novel strategy would be applied to treat cancer cells expressing higher level of the EGFR.

Nanotechnology was developed as one of the therapeutic approaches against cancer17. Application of GNP in the cancer therapy is increasing due to its unique perpetuity40, 41. Therefore, we tried to conjugate this to EGF for application in the plasma medicine. At first, we used three different linkers including MPA, MUA, and MHDA to make self-assembled monolayer (SAM) between EGF and GNP. We finally adopted MUA and MHDA linkers which are composed of eleven and sixteen carbons, respectively. We dropped MPA since it showed no receptor-mediated endocytosis of EGF-GNP conjugates, followed by no change in ERK signaling (Fig. 3B). The result suggests that short alkanethiols in SAM made with MPA do not have adequate space for a proper function.

We previously suggested that treatment with antibody-conjugated gold nanoparticle significantly enhances NTP-mediated cell death42. However, low cell permeability and inaccurate targeting due to steric hindrance from the large antibody molecule dampen the enthusiasm of this strategy. Thus, we propose our new strategy in this report by using the GNP-conjugated EGF ligand to target EGFR-expressing cancer cells for NTP irradiation. We think that gold nanoparticles penetrate into A549 cells without any modification through receptor-mediated endocytosis as there are a few reports for this43, 44. However, we thought that this process could be enhanced by tagging the gold nanoparticles with EGF ligand. We indirectly showed this by performing MTT analysis in Fig. 4A. Treatment with the GNP followed by NTP showed little apoptosis, but the EGF-conjugated GNP showed a significantly enhanced apoptosis. Since the treatment with the EGF alone did not induce similar degree of apoptosis, we suppose that the conjugated GNP was retained more in the treated cell than unmodified GNP control. However, quantitative determination of internalized GNP and the response to NTP still await further studies.

Mechanism of GNP endocytosis includes clathrin/caveloar-mediated endocytosis, phagocytosis, macropinocytosis, and pinocytosis45. It is speculated in this report that the internalization of the GNP was facilitated by EGF conjugation, implying that receptor-mediated endocytosis played an important role. It is already reported that the internalized GNP confers radio-sensitivity on treated cells to increase effect of the ionizing radiation46. Thus we also think that the endocytosed GNP in cancer cells could elicit a massive apoptotic response by the NTP irradiation and finally induce cancer regression. We also suggest that this target-specificity of the EGF-GNP conjugates could aim cancer cells expressing high level of the EGFR such as breast cancer47.

In this report, we detected a significant elevation of NF-κB expression through the treatment with the EGF-GNP complexes without the NTP irradiation. Since it is previously reported that nanoparticles elicit various cellular responses including inflammation33, it can be expected that the EGF-GNP conjugate made the treated cells permissive to apoptosis by expressing the NF-κB. Indeed, there was no apoptosis with the treatment with the EGF-GNP conjugates without NTP irradiation at Fig. 3D. However, 50 seconds of NTP irradiation at 2.5 kV showed marked decrease in cell viability after the treatment with the EGF-GNP as shown in Fig. 4A. Thus, it seems like that the treatment with the EGF-GNP conjugate alone is not appropriate to elicit apoptosis of treated cells.

The present study shows that the EGF-conjugated GNP was internalized into a cell through EGFR-mediated endocytosis. Subsequent irradiation of NTP could effectively elicit a specific apoptotic response in GNP-treated cells. Taken together we suggest that this novel strategy we introduced here may overcome current limitations of plasma medicine in cancer treatment.


Cell culture

A549, DU145, HT29, and SK-OV(3) cell lines were grown in RPMI-1640 medium (Hyclone, Pittsburgh, PA). SH-SY5Y and HeLa cell lines were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Hyclone, Pittsburgh, PA). Both media contained 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Hyclone, Pittsburgh, PA) and 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, ST. Louis, MO). Cells were incubated under humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37 °C. For serum starvation, A549 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium without serum, complemented with 1% penicillin/streptomycin for 24 hours at 37 °C. Cells were counted after stained with 0.4% trypan blue solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

EGF conjugation with 5 nm-gold nanoparticle (GNP)

The EGF-conjugated GNP was prepared as we previously described21. Briefly, 0.1 mg/ml aqueous solution of 3-mercaptopropionic acid (MPA), 11-mercaptoundecanoic acid (MUA), and 16-mercaptohexadecanoic acid (MHDA) were prepared and incubated with 5 nm colloidal gold (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) suspension. After overnight incubation at room temperature, mixtures were reacted with 1 mM N-ethyl-N′-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC) solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) for 30 minutes at room temperature. EDC-terminated gold nanoparticle was incubated with 1 mg/ml of EGF peptide. After centrifugation, 100 μl of 1% BSA (Bovine Serum Albumin) was added and stored at 4 °C.

Western, dot blotting, and antibodies

Harvested cells were lysed in buffer containing 4% SDS and 2 M urea in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Western blotting and dot blotting were performed as we previously described48. Antibodies were purchased as indicated: anti-EGFR (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), anti-GAPDH (ICN Biomedicals, Irvine, CA), anti-phospho-ERK (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), anti-14-3-3ξ (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX), anti-EGF (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), anti-BAX (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), anti-p53 (Santa Cruz Technology, Dallas, TX), anti-γH2AX (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA). HRP-conjugated species-specific secondary antibodies (KPL, Gaithersburg, MD) were visualized under LAS-4000 chemiluminescence detection system (FUJIFILM, Tokyo, Japan). Acquired images were analyzed using Image Gauge (FUJIFILM, Tokyo, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.


A549 cells were seeded on cover glasses in RPMI-1640 medium (Hyclone, Pittsburgh, PA) at 37 °C or 29.5 °C in a humidified incubator under 5% CO2. Treated cells were washed with PBS, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 20 min. 2% NP-40 in PBS was used to permeabilize cells for 5 min at room temperature. Cells were next incubated with blocking solution containing 10% FBS in PBS for 30 minutes at room temperature. Anti- EGFR (Abcam, Cambridge, MA) antibody in blocking solution was applied and, the protein was visualized with Alexa 488-conjugated secondary antibody. Nuclear counter staining was performed with 2 μg/ml of Hoechst 33342 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Images were captured by Axioplan2 fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).

Assessment of cell viability and apoptosis

Cell viability was assessed by using a chromogenic assay involving biological reduction of the tetrazolium salt 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide (MTT), which is converted into blue formazan crystals by living cells. A549 cells were seeded in 96-well plates and cultured as indicated. 12.5 μl of 10 mg/ml MTT solution (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was added and incubated for 2 hours at 37 °C. 100 μl of solubilizing solution (25% of SDS, 62.5% of dimethyl formamide) was added and incubated for 3 hours at 37 °C. Optical density was measured at 570 nm.

TUNEL (Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling) assay

A549 cells were seeded on cover glasses in RPMI-1640 medium. Cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 minutes at room temperature. 0.5% NP-40 in PBS was used to permeabilize the cells. To detect damaged DNA, DeadENDTM Fluorometric TUNEL System (Promega, Madison, WI) was used according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Briefly, equilibration buffer was applied to cover glass, followed by addition of nucleotide mix and rTdT enzyme. After 1 hour of incubation at 37 °C, cells were washed and counterstained.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Karbowski, M., Norris, K. L., Cleland, M. M., Jeong, S. Y. & Youle, R. J. Role of Bax and Bak in mitochondrial morphogenesis. Nature 443, 658–662 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Hao, Z. et al. Specific ablation of the apoptotic functions of cytochrome C reveals a differential requirement for cytochrome C and Apaf-1 in apoptosis. Cell 121, 579–591 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kuida, K. et al. Reduced apoptosis and cytochrome c-mediated caspase activation in mice lacking caspase 9. Cell 94, 325–337 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Yoshida, H. et al. Apaf1 is required for mitochondrial pathways of apoptosis and brain development. Cell 94, 739–750 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Barham, G. & Clarke, N. M. Genetic regulation of embryological limb development with relation to congenital limb deformity in humans. J Child Orthop 2, 1–9, doi:10.1007/s11832-008-0076-2 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Brown, J. M. & Attardi, L. D. The role of apoptosis in cancer development and treatment response. Nat Rev Cancer 5, 231–237, doi:10.1038/nrc1560 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Mukhtar, E., Adhami, V. M. & Mukhtar, H. Targeting microtubules by natural agents for cancer therapy. Mol Cancer Ther 13, 275–284, doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0791 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Guo, W., Chen, W., Yu, W., Huang, W. & Deng, W. Small interfering RNA-based molecular therapy of cancers. Chin J Cancer 32, 488–493, doi:10.5732/cjc.012.10280 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Scott, A. M., Allison, J. P. & Wolchok, J. D. Monoclonal antibodies in cancer therapy. Cancer Immun 12, 14 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Gregory Fridman, G. F., Gutsol, A., Shekhter, A. B. & Vasilets, V. N. Alexander Fridman. Applied Plasma Medicine. Plasma Processes and Polymers 5, 503–533 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Kieft, I. E. et al. Electric discharge plasmas influence attachment of cultured CHO K1 cells. Bioelectromagnetics 25, 362–368, doi:10.1002/bem.20005 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Kim, G. J., Kim, W., Kim, K. T. & Lee, J. K. DNA damage and mitochondria dysfunction in cell apoptosis induced by nonthermal air plasma. Appl Phys Lett 96, 0215021–0215023 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Rachel Sensenig, S. K. et al. Non-thermal Plasma Induces Apoptosis in Melanoma Cells via Production of Intracellular Reactive Oxygen Species. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, s10439-10010-10197-x (2010).

  14. 14.

    Ahn, H. J. et al. Targeting cancer cells with reactive oxygen and nitrogen species generated by atmospheric-pressure air plasma. PLoS One 9, e86173, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086173 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Iseki, S. et al. Selective killing of ovarian cancer cells through induction of apoptosis by nonequilibrium atmospheric pressure plasma. Applied Physics Letters 100, 113702, doi:10.1063/1.3694928 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ma, Y. et al. Non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma preferentially induces apoptosis in p53-mutated cancer cells by activating ROS stress-response pathways. PLoS One 9, e91947, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091947 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Service, R. F. Nanotechnology takes aim at cancer. Science 310, 1132–1134 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hainfeld, J. F., Slatkin, D. N. & Smilowitz, H. M. The use of gold nanoparticles to enhance radiotherapy in mice. Phys Med Biol 49, N309–N315 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Xiaoqian, C. et al. Synergistic effect of gold nanoparticles and cold plasma on glioblastoma cancer therapy. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 47, 335402 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Kaushik, N. K. et al. Data on combination effect of PEG-coated gold nanoparticles and non-thermal plasma inhibit growth of solid tumors. Data Brief 9, 318–323, doi:10.1016/j.dib.2016.08.059 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Kim, G. C. et al. Air plasma coupled with antibody-conjugated nanoparticles: a new weapon against cancer. Journal of Physics D-Applied Physics 42, 032005 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Nicholson, R. I., Gee, J. M. & Harper, M. E. EGFR and cancer prognosis. Eur J Cancer 37(Suppl 4), S9–15, doi:S0959804901002313 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Normanno, N. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. Gene 366, 2–16, doi:10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.018 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Milanezi, F., Carvalho, S. & Schmitt, F. C. EGFR/HER2 in breast cancer: a biological approach for molecular diagnosis and therapy. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 8, 417–434, doi:10.1586/14737159.8.4.417 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Zhang, F. et al. Quantification of epidermal growth factor receptor expression level and binding kinetics on cell surfaces by surface plasmon resonance imaging. Anal Chem 87, 9960–9965, doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02572 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Sherwood, E. R. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor activation in androgen-independent but not androgen-stimulated growth of human prostatic carcinoma cells. Br J Cancer 77, 855–861 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Xu, H. et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related protein inhibits multiple members of the EGFR family in colon and breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 4, 435–442, doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-04-0280 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Rossler, J. et al. EGFR inhibition using gefitinib is not active in neuroblastoma cell lines. Anticancer Res 29, 1327–1333 (2009).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Guo, J., Schally, A. V., Zarandi, M., Varga, J. & Leung, P. C. Antiproliferative effect of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) antagonist on ovarian cancer cells through the EGFR-Akt pathway. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 8, 54, doi:10.1186/1477-7827-8-54 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Qian, Y. et al. Enhanced cytotoxic activity of cetuximab in EGFR-positive lung cancer by conjugating with gold nanoparticles. Sci Rep 4, 7490, doi:10.1038/srep07490 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Xu, K. P., Dartt, D. A. & Yu, F. S. EGF-induced ERK phosphorylation independent of PKC isozymes in human corneal epithelial cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43, 3673–3679 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Vieira, A. V., Lamaze, C. & Schmid, S. L. Control of EGF receptor signaling by clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Science 274, 2086–2089 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Marano, F., Hussain, S., Rodrigues-Lima, F., Baeza-Squiban, A. & Boland, S. Nanoparticles: molecular targets and cell signalling. Arch Toxicol 85, 733–741, doi:10.1007/s00204-010-0546-4 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Francis, G. L. Albumin and mammalian cell culture: implications for biotechnology applications. Cytotechnology 62, 1–16, doi:10.1007/s10616-010-9263-3 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Lawrence, T. The nuclear factor NF-kappaB pathway in inflammation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 1, a001651, doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a001651 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    van der Geer, P., Hunter, T. & Lindberg, R. A. Receptor protein-tyrosine kinases and their signal transduction pathways. Annu Rev Cell Biol 10, 251–337, doi:10.1146/annurev.cb.10.110194.001343 (1994).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Schlessinger, J. & Ullrich, A. Growth factor signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Neuron 9, 383–391, doi:0896-6273(92)90177-F (1992).

  38. 38.

    Weigel, P. H. & Oka, J. A. Temperature dependence of endocytosis mediated by the asialoglycoprotein receptor in isolated rat hepatocytes. Evidence for two potentially rate-limiting steps. J Biol Chem 256, 2615–2617 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Chipuk, J. E. et al. Direct activation of Bax by p53 mediates mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and apoptosis. Science 303, 1010–1014, doi:10.1126/science.1092734 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Link, S. & El-Sayed, M. A. Spectral properties and relaxation dynamics of surface plasmon electronic oscillations in gold and silver nanodots and nanorods. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 103, 8410–8426 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Link, S. & El-Sayed, M. A. Size and temperature dependence of the plasmon absorption of colloidal gold nanoparticles. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 103, 4212–4217 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Kim, G., Park, S. R., Kim, G. C. & Lee, J. K. Targeted Cancer Treatment Using Anti-EGFR and -TFR Antibody-Conjugated Gold Nanoparticles Stimulated by Nonthermal Air. Plasma. 1, 45–54, doi:10.1615/PlasmaMed.v1.i1.40 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Dykman, L. A. & Khlebtsov, N. G. Uptake of engineered gold nanoparticles into mammalian cells. Chem Rev 114, 1258–1288, doi:10.1021/cr300441a (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Chithrani, B. D., Ghazani, A. A. & Chan, W. C. Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett 6, 662–668, doi:10.1021/nl052396o (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Oh, N. & Park, J. H. Endocytosis and exocytosis of nanoparticles in mammalian cells. Int J Nanomedicine 9(Suppl 1), 51–63, doi:10.2147/IJN.S26592 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    McQuaid, H. N. et al. Imaging and radiation effects of gold nanoparticles in tumour cells. Sci Rep 6, 19442, doi:10.1038/srep19442 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Anders, C. & Carey, L. A. Understanding and treating triple-negative breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 22, 1233–1239; discussion 1239–1240, 1243 (2008).

  48. 48.

    Kim, S. et al. Vaccinia-related kinase 2 mediates accumulation of polyglutamine aggregates via negative regulation of the chaperonin TRiC. Mol Cell Biol 34, 643–652, doi:10.1128/MCB.00756-13 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was carried out with the supports of the “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01121602)” from Rural Development Administration, the Brain Research program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT (Grants Nos 2017023478, 2015M3A9E2066986) and BK21 Plus funded by the Ministry of Education [10Z20130012243], Korea.

Author information




W.K. and K.Y.N. carried out the experimental work and analyzed the results. The methodology was conceived by W.K., K.Y.N., and H.W.L., J.K.L. and K.T.K. conceptualized and supervised this study. W.K., K.H.L., and K.T.K. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kyong-Tai Kim.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, W., Na, KY., Lee, KH. et al. Selective uptake of epidermal growth factor-conjugated gold nanoparticle (EGF-GNP) facilitates non-thermal plasma (NTP)-mediated cell death. Sci Rep 7, 10971 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing