Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Divergent Evolution of Carbonaceous Aerosols during Dispersal of East Asian Haze

Abstract

Wintertime East Asia is plagued by severe haze episodes, characterized by large contributions of carbonaceous aerosols. However, the sources and atmospheric transformations of these major components are poorly constrained, hindering development of efficient mitigation strategies and detailed modelling of effects. Here we present dual carbon isotope (δ13C and Δ14C) signatures for black carbon (BC), organic carbon (OC) and water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) aerosols collected in urban (Beijing and BC for Shanghai) and regional receptors (e.g., Korea Climate Observatory at Gosan) during January 2014. Fossil sources (>50%) dominate BC at all sites with most stemming from coal combustion, except for Shanghai, where liquid fossil source is largest. During source-to-receptor transport, the δ13C fingerprint becomes enriched for WSOC but depleted for water-insoluble OC (WIOC). This reveals that the atmospheric processing of these two major pools are fundamentally different. The photochemical aging (e.g., photodissociation, photooxidation) during formation and transport can release CO2/CO or short-chain VOCs with lighter carbon, whereas the remaining WSOC becomes increasingly enriched in δ13C. On the other hand, several processes, e.g., secondary formation, rearrangement reaction in the particle phase, and photooxidation can influence WIOC. Taken together, this study highlights high fossil contributions for all carbonaceous aerosol sub-compartments in East Asia, and suggests different transformation pathways for different classes of carbonaceous aerosols.

Introduction

Thick smog shrouded Beijing and the northeast corridor of China in January of both 20131,2,3,4 and 2014, spreading out over a vast area of East Asia (Fig. 1). These events propelled regional air pollution to the top of the agenda also for the public and policymakers. In some East Asian cities, the daily average PM2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter ≤2.5 µm) levels for 2013 were more than ten times the World Health Organization (WHO) daily maximum level (25 µg m−3)1, 5. The Chinese Government has issued far-reaching policies to combat air pollution such as the ‘Action Plan for Air Pollution Prevention and Control (2013‒2017)’ and ‘Coordinated Development of Ecological Environment Protection Plan in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area’ (2015); with the latter plan including a mandatory 40% reduction in annual average concentrations of PM2.5 by 2020 in Beijing compared to 20136, 7. However, achieving such ambitious goals remains a challenge in part due to large uncertainties concerning the contributions from different emission sources and complex atmospheric processes.

Carbonaceous aerosols (CA) – including black carbon (BC, or elemental carbon, EC) and organic carbon (OC) – are large components (35‒50%) of PM2.5 1 in East Asia8. BC is the highly condensed carbonaceous residue derived exclusively from incomplete combustion of biomass and fossil fuel (e.g., coal and liquid petroleum)9. Conversely, OC is composed of water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) and water-insoluble organic carbon (WIOC) and can either be emitted as primary particles from combustion and other primary sources or formed as secondary organic aerosol (SOA) via oxidation of natural and anthropogenic precursors.

Technology-based emission inventories (EI) estimate that anthropogenic BC and OC emissions from East Asia contribute more than 20% of current global emissions8, 10, 11. However, there exist large disagreements regarding the sources of ambient aerosols between source-diagnostic atmospheric observations and model-predicted source contributions (from technology-based emission inventory databases), implying potentially factors of 2–4 uncertainties in BC and OC EIs10,11,12. More specifically, this is reflected in the relative contributions from fossil fuel combustion (versus biomass burning) being systematically under-predicted by EI models relative to atmospheric-observational 14C-based diagnostic source apportionment of BC, for both South Asia and East Asia3, 10, 13,14,15,16.

Combustion-derived BC is the most important light-absorbing component of aerosols, exerting a positive, but highly uncertain radiative forcing (~0.2–1.0 W/m2)9, 10, 17, 18. The large uncertainty in assessing BC climate effects stems from uncertainties in emission estimates, effective light absorption and atmospheric lifetime18. In contrast, OC contributes mainly to cooling through both direct and indirect effects. The uncertainties regarding OC are perhaps even larger than for BC, given the chemical complexity of its dual primary and secondary formation pathways, and propensity for atmospheric transformations19. Studies have also shown that light-absorbing OC19,20,21 may contribute to positive aerosol forcing22, 23. A large fraction of OC is soluble in water, and thus classified as WSOC2, 24,25,26.

In recent years, studies based on dual-carbon isotopes (radiocarbon 14C/12C and stable carbon 13C/12C) have proven the ability to quantitatively constrain the relative contribution from different sources of carbonaceous aerosols2, 3, 13,14,15,16, 25, 27. The fossil sources are completely depleted in 14C while the biomass sources have a modern and constrained 14C/12C signature, allowing calculating the fraction of fossil versus biomass with high resolution. Moreover, the isotopic signatures of 14C/12C (∆14C) and 13C/12C (δ13C) can be combined in a 2D isotope signature with additional source-diagnostic and atmospheric processing information. For EC, the δ13C data for East Asia allows separation of fossil source into liquid fossil (e.g., traffic) and coal combustion, whereas the δ13C source signatures of OC pools are perturbed by atmospheric processing. So far, most 14C-based studies have focused on the total carbon (TC) or one specific CA isolate1,2,3, 13,14,15,16, 27,28,29. A simultaneous fingerprinting of the dual-carbon isotope composition of EC, OC, TC, WSOC, and WIOC in the same aerosol samples has the potential to advance our understanding of the sources of East Asian carbonaceous aerosols.

To this end, we here present δ13C/∆14C-diagnosed sources of EC, OC, WSOC, and WIOC in East Asia. Samples of the fine particles (PM2.5) were collected in January 2014 both at megacity source sites and rural receptor sites, including Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH, Beijing and Tianjin) area, Yangtze River Delta (YRD, Shanghai and Zhejiang), and Korea Climate Observatory at Gosan (KCOG, SE Yellow Sea, South Korea) (Supplementary Fig. S1). Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations were then employed to perform statistical source apportionment modelling of the two-dimensional isotopic signature of EC. The isotopic fingerprints of such near-synoptic aerosol samples provide integrated source constraints and additionally contribute constraints on atmospheric processing during long-range over-ocean transport of the East Asian haze. Knowledge about the sources and processing of carbonaceous aerosol components from this study facilitate an improved estimate of aerosol-induced climate and health impacts, and a scientific underpinning for developing a regionally-tailored mitigation strategy for different areas and source profiles in East Asia.

Results and Discussion

January 2014 regional aerosol regime

High anthropogenic aerosol concentrations in January 2014 enveloped a vast area of East Asia (AOD > 0.3; Fig. 1), strongly affecting regional air quality and radiative budget. The analysis of NOAA HYSPLIT back trajectories (BT)30 indicate prevailing air mass transport from continental northeast Asia to the regional-scale receptor site KCOG during this time (Figs S212). Higher than average PM2.5 loadings (27.8 ± 21.6 µg m3) were observed at KCOG, and multiple air pollution episodes, where hourly concentration frequently reached 70 µg m3 with a peak of 173 µg m3 on 20 January, were recorded at the KCOG station (3‒4, 6‒8, 10‒12, 16‒20, 25‒26, and 28‒29 January) (Fig. 2). These pollution events were characterized by co-occurring high concentrations for multiple aerosol and gas species, for instance: aerosol light absorption (b abs at 528 nm) and scattering (b scat at 550 nm) frequently reached 20 and 250 Mm−1; several times higher than during background periods (Fig. 2). In addition, two obvious Asian dust storms, characterized by their elevated PM10/PM2.5 ratios, were observed during 1‒2 and 30‒31 January.

Carbon aerosol concentrations at the urban and regional sites

Simultaneous measurements of EC, OC, WSOC, and WIOC (=OC − WSOC) concentrations at urban and rural receptor sites allow to investigate the synoptic atmospheric evolution of these carbon aerosol fractions. During January 2014, the PM2.5, EC, and OC concentrations were significantly higher at the sites in north China (Beijing, EC = 7.5 ± 3.9 μg m−3, OC = 28.4 ± 13.0 μg m−3; BTH, PM2.5 (117–353 μg m−3), EC = 7.5 ± 3.4 μg m−3, OC = 48.8 ± 21.3 μg m−3) compared to east China (Shanghai, EC = 1.7 ± 0.7 μg m−3, OC = 6.7 ± 3.3 μg m−3; YRD, PM2.5 (40–189 μg m−3), EC = 3.2 ± 1.5 μg m−3, OC = 18.2 ± 10.8 μg m−3), which in turn were higher than at the KCOG receptor site (EC = 0.7 ± 0.7 μg m−3, OC = 3.3 ± 2.9 μg m−3) (Fig. 3 and Table S1). Taken together, this shows that the air pollution was most pronounced in the northern region, but also that it indeed is a phenomenon extending over a large region, since the levels of carbon aerosol fractions at the inland regional sites (BTH and YRD) were on the same scale as their urban/megacity counterparts (Beijing and Shanghai) (Figs 3 and S13, and Table S1).

The January 2014 regional-scale haze in China is unfortunately not an isolated event; similar characteristics were also found for, e.g., January 2013. Concentrations were similar or slightly higher in January 2014 (Fig. S13 and Table S1) compared with the concentration measurements in January 2013 for BTH (EC: 3.5 ± 2.1 μg m−3, OC: 32.9 ± 16.8 μg m−3)3, YRD (EC: 2.3 ± 0.9 μg m−3, OC: 17.7 ± 5.3 μg m−3)3, and Beijing (EC: 5.58 ± 1.4 μg m−3, OC: 32.3 ± 22.6 μg m−3)31. For this more comprehensive January 2014 investigation, it was found that there is a significant inter- and intra-site variability of the OC/EC-ratio (~2‒11), suggesting partly decoupled emissions sources and influence by atmospheric processing (Fig. 3b). Some high OC/EC-ratio (e.g., 16 January at BTH) is probably due to large secondary organic aerosol formation.

The observed mean WSOC concentrations in PM2.5 for Beijing (9.8 ± 5.6 μg m−3), BTH (14.7 ± 5.8 μg m−3), Shanghai (3.1 ± 1.6 μg m−3), YRD (6.2 ± 3.4 μg m−3), and KCOG (2.2 ± 2.0 μg m−3) spanned ranges of 4.3–23.8, 8.5–25.9, 1.2–5.9, 3.0–11.6, and 0.3–6.8 μg m−3, respectively (Fig. 3c, Table S1). Similar WSOC concentrations in Beijing was reported for January 2013 (10.8 ± 3.1 μg m−3)31. The contributions of WSOC to OC were ~40% for the mainland China sites, but increased significantly during long-range transport to KCOG (66%), suggesting a significant difference in OC regimes (Fig. 3d). The WSOC concentrations at the different sites during the 2014 winter campaign were in good agreement with previous findings in East Asia2, 26, 31,32,33, while elevated WSOC levels and WSOC/OC ratios were here observed at KCOG.

∆14C -based source apportionment

Samples were selected for carbon isotope analysis from these high-pollution episodes from both source regions and the receptor stations (see Fig. S13 and Table S2). The synoptic weather patterns (Figs S1419) and BTs indicate that the KCOG samples intercepted the main prevailing outflows from BTH and northern China. Here we find that the natural abundance radiocarbon (∆14C) signatures showed large fractional contributions from fossil fuels (fraction fossil, f fossil > 50%) for all carbon fractions (EC; OC; WSOC; WIOC) in the January 2014 East Asian haze for all sites, suggesting that the aerosol regime in general is dominated by fossil combustion sources regardless of the division between primary emission or secondary formation (Fig. 4, Table S2). The EC, from primary incomplete combustion emissions, is characterized by high fossil contributions over both mainland China (Beijing 79 ± 2%; BTH 77 ± 3%; Shanghai 79 ± 1%) and in the SE Yellow Sea receptor region represented by KCOG (~66 ± 9%) (Fig. 4a). These values of f fossil of EC are comparable to those reported for the few previous studies for this region, but more fossil than what is found for South Asia where a 50/50 balance is more common3, 13,14,15, 28, 34.

The OC, on the other hand, is formed from both incomplete combustion and other emission sources. Both primary and secondary OC are often considered to stem mainly from biomass burning/biogenic sources. However, the fossil contribution to WSOC in Beijing and KCOG in the present study are significantly higher compared to what had been found for WSOC in previous reports for South Asia (8–22%)25, (14–29%)35, Europe (4–24%)36, and North America (19–33%)37, (0–25%)38. Here, we add to recent literature to show that OC is even more dominantly fossil in wintertime Beijing39 and KCOG2. Intriguingly, the two main components of OC, WSOC and WIOC, display clear source differences: WIOC is more fossil at both Beijing (75 ± 3%) and KCOG (59 ± 3%) compared to WSOC (Beijing 56 ± 3%; KCOG 50 ± 8%) (Fig. 4b). Additionally, we note that all three major carbonaceous aerosol pools (EC, WSOC, WIOC) are more fossil in Beijing than at KCOG. The slightly lower f fossil of carbon-aerosol fractions at KCOG is likely a consequence of a slight mixture of multiple sources during the long-range air transport. However, f fossil of each carbon component for synoptic aerosol samples from Beijing and KCOG differ by only 10–25%.

Dual carbon-isotope based source apportionment of EC

EC is highly recalcitrant to oxidation in the atmosphere. The δ13C signature of EC is therefore not affected by atmospheric processing to any large extent3, 27. The δ13C signature of EC (as opposed to OC) is therefore an important marker for EC emissions sources. For the present campaign, the ∆14C signatures of EC for Beijing, BTH, and Shanghai sites are close to the same horizontal line, and as low as −800‰ (Fig. S20), indicating their similarly high f fossil (Fig. 4a). In contrast, the δ13C signals for Shanghai-EC (~−25.8 ± 0.1‰) is more depleted relative to that of Beijing-EC (~−24.4 ± 0.2‰) and BTH-EC (~−24.3 ± 0.5‰) (Figs 4a and S21). The ∆14C for EC at KCOG (~−625‰) has a higher biomass contribution, yet the δ13C (~−23.9 ± 0.4‰) is also depleted compared to Shanghai and remains in the range of EC for N. China (Beijing and BTH) source region.

The three main emissions sources for EC in East Asia are: biomass burning, liquid fossil combustion (e.g., traffic) and coal combustion. These three broad categories can be differentiated also by means of their δ13C signatures. By combining the δ13C and ∆14C signatures, a means for resolving the relative contributions for these source categories for EC by isotopic mass balance is obtained. A Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo approach (MCMC) is used to account for the variability of the isotopic signatures from the different sources (see Table S3 for isotopic source signatures/endmembers)3. The results of the MCMC calculations are the posterior probability density functions (PDF) for the relative contribution of the three EC sources (Figs 5b and S22). To improve the precision of the estimated source fractions we combine several data points from each sampling site in the MCMC simulations3. Using the fraction coal as an example, the precision increases for combined data relative to for isolated data points (comparison illustrated in Fig. S23). For KOCG the variability in EC- 14C is larger than the expected endmember variability, suggesting variable source contributions and thereby challenging the MCMC averaging procedure implemented here. However, to allow comparisons of the overall source regimes affecting the different sites, this method is also implemented for KCOG, although the direct interpretation of estimated uncertainties is more complicated compared to the other stations. The results for the biomass burning contribution is similar to that acquired from ∆14C directly (Tables S2 and S4). The additional information provided by the MCMC of combined δ13C and ∆14C data is the further refinement and deconvolution of the fossil fraction into the two sub categories coal (f coal) and liquid fossil fuel (f liq fossil). The MCMC results reveal that the contributions of coal combustion were dominant for Beijing-EC (53 ± 14%), BTH-EC (56 ± 13%), and KCOG-EC (54 ± 11%) relative to that for Shanghai-EC (22 ± 14%) (Fig. 5a, Table S4). The larger proportion coal combustion for Beijing-EC and BTH-EC can be connected to the extensive coal use for residential heating in northern China during the heating season40, in addition to source contributions from coal-fired sectors such as the industry and power plant. Recent Weather Research and Forecasting model with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) simulations also indicate that residential solid fuel (coal and biomass) burning contributes far more to primary PM2.5 emissions in Beijing and the surrounding region than the transportation and power sectors combined, and more than all industry in winter41. The relatively lower contributions from liquid fossil fuel (e.g., transport) and biomass burning compared to coal combustion still emitted notable EC, since the total EC burden in Beijing and BTH region were extraordinary large. Contrary to Beijing-EC, Shanghai-EC was comparably less affected by coal burning, while it was more affected by liquid fossil sources. Implementation of a more restricted vehicle emission control strategy for Shanghai and surrounding area may thus be an effective way to reduce not only EC aerosols but also OC aerosols for this region.

The structure of fuel/source contributions to EC shown in Fig. 5a depicts a clear geographical source fingerprint: northeast China (Beijing and BTH) and KCOG share a similar mixture with coal combustion dominating EC, while East China (i.e., YRD) EC has a greater imprint from liquid fossil fuel combustion. These observationally-based constraints on EC sources may contribute to eventually improved radiative forcing assessments, as not only improved emission fluxes, but also combustion source types matter, as it has been found that fossil-fuel-dominated EC plumes are approximately 100% more efficient warming agents compared to biomass-burning-dominated plumes42. The similar source signatures of KCOG-EC, Beijing-EC, and BTH-EC adds to the synoptic and BT analysis, suggesting that the larger-footprint East Asia EC aerosol, as reflected by the KCOG, were prevailingly affected by air transport over northeast China (BTH) during the sampling period.

Divergent atmospheric processing of WSOC and WIOC

The δ13C signature of carbonaceous aerosols is affected by both sources and atmospheric processing. In contrast to EC, OC is less recalcitrant to atmospheric processing and the δ13C for OC may thus be modulated by kinetic isotope effects (KIE) of atmospheric reactions during aerosol formation and atmospheric aging2, 25, 35, 43,44,45. While there is a deficit of studies on the δ13C shifts due to atmospheric reactions, the available data suggest that gas-phase products formed from oxidations of VOCs are depleted in δ13C signals compared to their precursors46, which is consistent with the expected direction for a KIE. One study on δ13C isotopic effects during SOA formation suggested that some SOA products were isotopically depleted, while the effect of other SOA products was sometimes so small that the δ13C of the particulate products remained inseparable to that of the precursor47. Laboratory studies of KIE have also found that particulate SOA formed from OH-initiated photooxidation of toluene (as representative of petroleum emissions) is depleted in δ13C44 while δ13C isotopic effect of biogenic β-pinene SOA was so small and indistinguishable from its precursor48. Taken together, these observations may suggest that the δ13C isotope effect during SOA formation indeed may induce total SOA products to be isotopically depleted. Since there are great diversity of emission precursors, SOA products, and SOA formation pathways49,50,51, the limited number of observations and large uncertainties of the isotopic effects on δ13C during SOA formation call on more measurements to constrain the δ13C effects during SOA formation, partitioning, and aging.

In contrast to the direction for δ13C shift due to SOA formation, observations have shown that photochemical aging of organic aerosols induces a fractionation in the aerosol δ13C, leading to more positive δ13C values in the remaining aerosols, consistent with KIE-induced preferential removal of lighter carbon isotopes (12C)45. These observations on δ13C shifts for secondary aerosol formation and for atmospheric photochemical aging, taken together, have led to the working hypothesis that the direction of δ13C evolution from source regions to receptor regions may be employed to indicate the relative dominance of fresh SOA formation vs aerosol photochemical aging during long-range transport2, 35.

The present study offers the opportunity to explore the δ13C-diagnosed CA dynamics between source and receptor regions in East Asia with the sampling in the same winter haze period, and also for different CA components. We first note that WSOC is more enriched in δ13C relative to OC, WIOC, TC, and EC, for both source-region Beijing and receptor-region KCOG (Figs 4 and S21). To compare the effects of atmospheric processing during long-range transport on both the WSOC and the WIOC pools, the ∆13C (=δ13Cobserved − δ13Csource-predicted) signatures were computed. The ∆13C is a means for decoupling the effects of atmospheric processing from the expected source signatures, details about the computation are given in the Methods. By combining ∆14C and ∆13C, we can isolate sources and atmospheric processes in the two dimensions (Fig. 6).

The ∆13C results show that both WSOC and WIOC are strongly influenced by atmospheric processing, but in opposite directions (Fig. 6). For WSOC, there is an enrichment in δ13C relative to predicted source values for all observations in both Beijing region and especially at the distant receptor KCOG, where there is several per mil of induced net fractionation. The difference in δ13C signatures for each carbon fraction between source and receptor provide a direct comparison of the effects of atmospheric processing for the different carbon components. The δ13C of recalcitrant EC show very little difference between source (Beijing and BTH) and receptor (KCOG), suggesting no (or very limited) atmospheric processing of this recalcitrant CA fraction (Fig. 4a). In contrast, all the δ13C signals of KCOG-WSOC (−22.8 ± 0.2‰) are well outside the initial source range and are more enriched compared to Beijing-OC (−25.1 ± 0.6‰), and Beijing-WSOC (−23.5 ± 0.7‰), indicating that WSOC is more likely affected by atmospheric oxidation/ageing during atmospheric transport compared to not only EC but also relative to other OC components (Figs 4b and S2021). The observed enrichment in δ13C of WSOC is consistent with simultaneously increased WSOC/OC ratios during the source-receptor transport, suggesting a sizeable effect of photochemical aging on OC pools (Fig. 3d). During atmospheric oxidation, some hydrocarbons are likely transformed into multifunctional OC with higher oxidation state and polarity, increasing their solubility in water43, 52. This photochemical aging transforms more hydrophobic OC aerosols to become more hydrophilic OC. The formed WSOC (e.g., carboxylic acids) can break down to release CO2/CO or short-chain VOCs during transport, whose isotopic composition would be δ13C-depleted because of the KIE effect, whereas the remaining aerosol WSOC becomes increasingly enriched in δ13C45, 53. In addition, the high relative humidity in the air during the oversea transport may facilitate the WSOC partitioning in the particle phase.

In contrast to WSOC, fossil-dominated WIOC in Beijing clusters around the δ13C of the source endmember range, yet with all observations on the depleted side (Fig. 6). After long-range oversea transport to KCOG, the ∆13CWIOC signals are all negative (depleted). An explanation for the lower extent of isotope fractionation for WIOC compared to WSOC is that many fossil components in WIOC are relatively more recalcitrant than WSOC54. The lower f fossil of WSOC may reflect that OC of biomass burning origins are more water soluble55 and that oxidative aging of carbonaceous aerosols hence is preferential for more 14C-modern (i.e., biomass) components2, 25, 35. It is striking that the shift in ∆13C of WIOC and WSOC are in diametrically opposed directions, implying fundamentally different atmospheric processing and/or emission ratios of these two major components of carbonaceous aerosols in the East Asian haze.

In addition to a depletion of ∆13C, suggesting formation of WIOC through secondary processes, aging may also occur through rearrangement reactions (e.g., oligomerization/polymerization) and other transformations of some of the WIOC pool into the WSOC pool38, generating less hygroscopic large molecules within the particle phase56, 57. Since there is no net transfer of total carbon, these reactions do not affect δ13C signature of the total carbon (TC). However, these processes may redistribute WSOC and WIOC pools and shift the δ13C signature of a subpopulation, and can contribute to depleted signature in δ13C of WIOC. Clearly, the WSOC and WIOC compartments are resulting from diametrically different sources, formation, and aging.

Implications

A vast area of East Asia experience severe and persistent aerosol pollution during winter. Our quantitative isotope-based constraints reveal that fossil sources are dominant for not only EC, but also for WIOC and WSOC aerosols in East Asia winter, yet with EC showing the highest relative fossil contribution. Emissions from fossil fuel combustion are a key target to combat the carbonaceous aerosol pollution. The δ13C/∆14C-based MCMC calculations of EC aerosols show that the contribution of coal combustion in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region are larger than liquid fossil and biomass burning combined, highlighting that reducing coal combustion and improving its burning efficiency should be top priority for efforts to fight EC and also (co-emitted) OC in this area. Reducing EC emissions by reduction and replacement of high-emitting end-use coal-fired combustion processes with cleaner energy across various sectors or by using cleaner residential stoves for space heating and cooking instead of ones with uncontrolled and inefficient combustion of coal will limit emissions, benefiting both climate and air quality. In parallel, controlling emissions from liquid-fossil-fueled vehicles should be another priority in Beijing and especially Shanghai megacities. Eliminating emissions from biomass burning (e.g., heating, open fires of crop residue) could be an efficient strategy in all regions.

In general, the isotopic fingerprints of synoptic samples in East Asia provide temporal and geographic source constraints and allow assessing the atmospheric processing that is occurring during over-ocean long-range transport. In forthcoming modelling efforts, the OC aerosols should be treated differently for WSOC and WIOC sub-compartments, to reflect their divergent evolution and different atmospheric processing. This top-down observation-based quantification of the sources of the different carbon aerosol components provides improved input for the aerosol parameterization in atmospheric chemistry transport models and to test/improve existing ‘bottom-up’ technology-based emission inventories of BC, OC, WIOC, and WSOC for East Asia, as well as a credible scientific underpinning for efficient mitigation actions toward efficiently reducing anthropogenic aerosol emissions.

Methods

The East Asia sampling campaign

The intensive wintertime aerosol pollution campaign was conducted at Beijing, Wuqing (BTH), Shanghai, Haining (YRD), and Korea Climate Observatory at Gosan (KCOG) during January 2014. Detailed description of sampling sites, sampling duration for each site, and instrumentation are provided in Supplementary Fig. S1, Tables S1 and S5, and Text S1. Daily aerosol samples were collected on pre-combusted quartz-fiber filters (Millipore) using high volume PM2.5 samplers2, 3, 31. At least three filter blanks were collected for each site throughout the duration of the campaign. The filter samples collected at the five sites were analyzed for concentrations of OC, EC, TC, and WSOC. The measurements of PM2.5 and PM10 (KCOG and Bongseong on Jeju Island) mass concentrations, aerosol absorption (b abs) and scattering (b scat) coefficients with PM1 inlet and meteorological data were collected at regional receptor site KCOG with high frequency (averaged to ≤1 h, Fig. 2). b abs and b scat were continuously measured by Continuous Light Absorption Photometer (CLAP) and Nephelometer58, 59.

Concentration measurements of carbonaceous aerosols

The carbonaceous aerosol concentrations (EC and OC) were measured by a thermal-optical transmission (TOT) analyzer (Sunset Laboratory Inc., Tigard, OR, USA) using the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) 5040 method60. The aerosol samples were acidified prior to analysis, by fumigation in open glass Petri dishes kept in a desiccator over 12 M hydrochloric acid for 24 h and subsequently dried at 60 °C for 1h, to remove the carbonates2, 25, 35. TC represents OC and EC, assuming inorganic carbon is equal to carbonates. The comparison of OC/EC concentration measurements between the acid fumigation of filter punches and non-acid treatments showed only small to no differences of less than 5% (e.g., Table S6 show the comparison for Shanghai samples). Thus, this treatment was unlikely to affect the overall carbon fraction concentration and further isotope measurements of EC and TC.

The analytical protocol for WSOC concentration measurement was described previously2, 25, 35. Briefly, WSOC was extracted by ultrasonication, centrifugation, and filtration of the supernatant using 0.02-μm cutoff aluminum syringe filters (Anotop 10 Plus; Whatman, Kent, UK) and quantified by a high-temperature catalytic oxidation instrument (Shimadzu-TOC-VCPH, Japan). TC and WSOC concentration values were blank corrected by subtracting an average of the field blanks. The mean relative standard deviation of triplicate analysis was <5% for EC, TC, and WSOC. No EC was detected in blanks. The instruments were frequently calibrated by standards and other reference materials.

Carbon isotope analysis

Synoptic samples with high carbon loadings, corresponding to high-pollution events, were selected for isolation of the different carbon components and their isotope measurements. For EC and TC isolation, a filter area corresponding to at least 60 μg of EC and TC for each sample was firstly treated to remove carbonates (same protocol as discussed in concentration measurement). Filter subsamples were then subjected to the NIOSH-5040 protocol for oxidation to CO2, and the produced CO2 was cryotrapped during the EC combustion phase (after online removal of water and halogen-containing gases through magnesium perchlorate and silver wool traps, respectively2, 3, 25, 27, 35). A putative effect of OC charring on the estimated EC isotope composition with this approach has been considered and evaluated in earlier investigations14, 16. The concentration measurement for EC were here also found to be quite similar between the acid and non-acid treatments, suggesting that such acid fumigation effects are very limited (Table S6), which is consistent with the earlier sensitivity test results for charring14, 16. The analytical method for isolation of WSOC to determine its carbon isotope composition has also been described previously2, 25, 35. Briefly, a filter area required for the subsequent 13C and 14C measurements was extracted in 10 ml of Milli-Q water. The extracts were freeze-dried and then successively redissolved in 150 μl of 1 M hydrochloric acid, in order to decarbonate the WSOC samples. The WSOC samples were then transferred into precombusted silver capsules and dried in the oven at 60 °C. Finally, the dried WSOC samples and EC and TC samples in flame-sealed glass ampules were analyzed for their natural 14C abundance and 13C/12C ratio using accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) at the US-NSF NOSAMS Facility (Woods Hole, MA, USA), as described previously2, 3, 13, 25, 27, 35. The isotopic compositions (13C and 14C) of OC (=TC − EC) and WIOC (=OC − WSOC) were derived from WSOC, TOC, and EC data using an isotope mass balance equation similar to previous studies2, 25. These data are presented in the Supporting Information (Table S2).

Fractional contribution of radiocarbon-extinct fossil fuel sources (f fossil) versus contemporary biomass/biogenic sources (f bio) can be determined using the isotopic mass balance equation:

$${{\rm{\Delta }}}^{14}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{sample}}}={{\rm{\Delta }}}^{14}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{fossil}}}{f}_{{\rm{fossil}}}+{{\rm{\Delta }}}^{14}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{bio}}}(1-{f}_{{\rm{fossil}}})$$
(1)

where, Δ14Csample represents the measured radiocarbon content of a sample and Δ14Cfossil is ‒ 1000‰, since fossil carbon is completely depleted in radiocarbon. End members for contemporary radiocarbon Δ14Cbio falls between +50 and +225‰. In East Asia, biomass value of Δ14Cbio = + 112 ± 60‰ is suggested and adopted3, 14, converting to a variability of <5% in the resulting calculated fraction of biomass using Markov-Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) techniques.

Source apportionment

The dual-carbon isotope signatures of EC were used in combination with a MCMC approach to further constrain the relative contributions from three source classes: biomass (f bio), coal (f coal) and liquid fossil fuel (f liq fossil)3.

$$(\begin{array}{c}{{\rm{\Delta }}}^{14}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{sample}}}\\ {{\rm{\delta }}}^{13}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{sample}}}\\ 1\end{array})=(\begin{array}{ccc}{{\rm{\Delta }}}^{14}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{bio}}} & {{\rm{\Delta }}}^{14}{{\rm{C}}}_{\mathrm{liq}\mathrm{fossil}} & {{\rm{\Delta }}}^{14}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{coal}}}\\ {{\rm{\delta }}}^{13}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{bio}}} & {{\rm{\delta }}}^{13}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{liq}}{\rm{fossil}}} & {{\rm{\delta }}}^{13}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{coal}}}\\ 1 & 1 & 1\end{array})\cdot \,(\begin{array}{c}{f}_{{\rm{bio}}}\\ {f}_{{\rm{liq}}{\rm{fossil}}}\\ {f}_{{\rm{coal}}}\end{array})\,$$
(2)

where f denotes the fractional contribution from a given source, sample denotes the value of the analyzed field sample and the other isotope-values are source signatures (‘bio’, ‘liq fossil’, and ‘coal’ corresponding to biomass/biogenic, liquid fossil fuel, and coal respectively). The last row ensures the mass-balance principle.

The calculation of ∆13C-signature

The Δ13C-signature of WSOC or WIOC is defined as:

$${{\rm{\Delta }}}^{13}{\rm{C}}={{\rm{\delta }}}^{13}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{observed}}}-{{\rm{\delta }}}^{13}{{\rm{C}}}_{\mathrm{source}-\mathrm{predicted}}$$
(3)

where δ13Cobserved is the observed signature for WSOC or WIOC, and δ13Csource-predicted is the predicted source mixture, defined as:

$${{\rm{\delta }}}^{13}{{\rm{C}}}_{\mathrm{source}-\mathrm{predicted}}={{\rm{\delta }}}^{13}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{bio}}}\cdot {f}_{{\rm{bio}}}+{{\rm{\delta }}}^{13}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{liq}}{\rm{fossil}}}\cdot {f}_{\mathrm{liq}\mathrm{fossil}}+{{\rm{\delta }}}^{13}{{\rm{C}}}_{{\rm{coal}}}\cdot {f}_{{\rm{coal}}}$$
(4)

where the parameters are defined analogously as in Eq (2). The f bio is calculated from the Δ14C-signature, and thus f fossil (=f liq fossil + f coal). However, the division between the two fossil sources is not known for WSOC and WIOC. The central feature of computing the ∆13C-signature is to estimate if the δ13Cobserved is significantly different from δ13Csource-predicted, thus implying influence of atmospheric processing. To estimate the δ13Csource-predicted, we use the leased biased representation of the two fossil sources, and represent the fractional contributions by a uniform probability density function (pdf; U[0,1]). The pdf for the δ13Csource-predicted is then calculated by integrating over the endmember and fractional fossil contributions using Monte Carlo numerical analysis. The mean δ13Csource-predicted and the numerical spread (e.g., the standard deviation) can be derived from this pdf, allowing to compute the mean and the source spread of the ∆13C. If the ∆13C is larger than the expected numerical spread, we infer that the δ13Cobserved for WSOC or WIOC is significantly influenced by atmospheric processing.

Data availability

The observatory data that support the finding of this study will be publicly available in the Bolin Center Database website (http://bolin.su.se/data/).

References

1. 1.

Huang, R.-J. et al. High secondary organic aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China. Nature 514, 218–222, doi:10.1038/nature13774 (2014).

2. 2.

Kirillova, E. N., Andersson, A., Han, J., Lee, M. & Gustafsson, Ö. Sources and light absorption of water-soluble organic carbon aerosols in the outflow from northern China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 14, 1413–1422, doi:10.5194/acp-14-1413-2014 (2014).

3. 3.

Andersson, A. et al. Regionally-varying combustion sources of the January 2013 severe haze events over eastern China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 2038–4496, doi:10.1021/es50385e (2015).

4. 4.

Ji, D. et al. The heaviest particulate air-pollution episodes occurred in northern China in January, 2013: Insights gained from observation. Atmos. Environ. 92, 546–556, doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.048 (2014).

5. 5.

WHO Air Quality Guidelines; http://whqlibdoc.who.int/hq/2006/WHO_SDE_PHE_OEH_06.02_eng.pdf (2005).

6. 6.

Chinese State Council. Air Pollution Prevention and Control Action Plan (http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2013-09/12/content_2486773.htm (in Chinese), 2013).

7. 7.

Xinhua News Agency, PM2.5: Decrease by approximately 40% in 2020 compared to 2013 (http://news.xinhuanet.com/politics/2015-12/30/c_1117630976.htm (in Chinese), 2015).

8. 8.

Lu, Z., Zhang, Q. & Streets, D. G. Sulfur dioxide and primary carbonaceous aerosol emission trends in China and India, 1996–2010. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11(18), 9839–9864 (2011).

9. 9.

Ramanathan, V. & Carmichael, G. Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nat. Geosci. 1, 221–227 (2008).

10. 10.

Bond, T. C. et al. Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: a scientific assessment. J. Geophy. Res. Atmos. 118, 5380–4496 (2013).

11. 11.

Bond, T. C. et al. A technology-based global inventory of black and organic carbon emissions from combustion. J. Geophy. Res. Atmos. 109, D14203 (2004).

12. 12.

Zhao, Y., Nielsen, C. P., Lei, Y., McElroy, M. B. & Hao, J. Quantifying the uncertainties of a bottom-up emission inventory of anthropogenic atmospheric pollutants in China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 2295–2308 (2011).

13. 13.

Gustafsson, Ö. et al. Brown carbon over South Asia: biomass or fossil fuel combustion? Science 323, 495–498 (2009).

14. 14.

Chen, B. et al. Source forensics of black carbon aerosols from China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 9102–9108 (2013).

15. 15.

Budhavant, K. et al. Radiocarbon-based source apportionment of elemental carbon aerosols at two South Asian receptor observatories over a full annual cycle. Environ. Res. Lett. 10, 064004 (2015).

16. 16.

Li, C. et al. Sources of black carbon to the Himalayan–Tibetan Plateau glaciers. Nat. Commun. 7, 12574, doi:10.1038/ncomms12574 (2016).

17. 17.

Stocker, T. F. et al. Climate Change 2013: The physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (Cambridge University Press, 2013).

18. 18.

Gustafsson, Ö. & Ramanathan, V. Convergence on climate warming by black carbon aerosols. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 4243–4245 (2016).

19. 19.

Laskin, A. et al. Chemistry of Atmospheric Brown Carbon. Chem. Rev. 15, 4345–4382 (2015).

20. 20.

Andreae, M. O. & Geleneser, A. Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of the light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 3131–3148 (2006).

21. 21.

Alexander, D. T. L. et al. Brown carbon spheres in East Asia outflow and their optical properties. Science 321, 833–836 (2008).

22. 22.

Feng, Y., Ramanathan, V. & Kotamarthi, V. R. Brown carbon: A significant atmospheric absorber of solar radiation? Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 8607–8621 (2013).

23. 23.

Chung, C. E. et al. Observational constrained estimates of carbonaceous aerosol radiative forcing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11624–11629 (2012).

24. 24.

Hecobian, A. et al. Water-soluble organic carbon material and the light-absorption characteristic of aqueous extracts measured over the Southeastern United States. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 5965–5977 (2010).

25. 25.

Bosch, C. et al. Source-diagnostic dual-isotope composition and optical properties of water-soluble organic carbon and elemental carbon in the South Asian outflow intercepted over the Indian Ocean. J. Geophy. Res. Atmos. 119, 11743–11759 (2014).

26. 26.

Cheng, Y. et al. Mass absorption efficiency of elemental carbon and water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing, China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 11497–11510 (2011).

27. 27.

Winiger, P., Andersson, A., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A. & Gustafsson, Ö. The sources of atmospheric black carbon at a European gateway to the Arctic. Nat. Comm. 7, 12776 (2016).

28. 28.

Zhang, Y. L. et al. Source apportionment of elemental carbon in Beijing, China: insights from radiocarbon and organic markers measurements. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 8408–8415 (2015).

29. 29.

Liu, D. et al. The use of levoglucosan and radiocarbon for source apportionment of PM2.5 carbonaceous aerosols at a background site in East China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 10454–10461 (2013).

30. 30.

Draxler, R. R. & Rolph, G. D. HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website (http://www.arl.noaa.gov/ready/hysplit4.html). NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, Silver Spring, MD.

31. 31.

Yan, C. Q. & Zheng, M. et al. Chemical characteristics and light-absorbing property of water-soluble organic carbon in Beijing: Biomass burning contributions. Atmos. Environ. 121, 4–12 (2015).

32. 32.

Feng, J. et al. A comparative study of the organic matter in PM2.5 from three Chinese megacities in three different climatic zones. Atmos. Environ. 40, 3983–3994 (2006).

33. 33.

Huang, H. et al. Characteristics of carbonaceous aerosol in PM2.5: Pearl Delta River Region, China. Atmos. Res. 104–105, 227–236, doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.10.016 (2012).

34. 34.

Zhang, Y. L. et al. Fossil vs. non-fossil sources of fine carbonaceous aerosols in four Chinese cities during the extreme winter haze episode of 2013. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 15(3), 1299–1312 (2015).

35. 35.

Kirillova, E. N. et al. Water-soluble organic carbon aerosols during a full New Delhi winter: Isotope-based source apportionment and optical properties. J. Geophy. Res. Atmos. 119, 3476–3485 (2014).

36. 36.

Szidat, S. et al. Source apportionment of aerosols by C-14 measurements in different carbonaceous particle fraction. Radiocarbon 46, 475–484 (2004).

37. 37.

Weber, R. J. et al. A study of secondary organic aerosol formation in the anthropogenic-influences southeastern United States. J. Geophy. Res. Atmos. 112, D13302 (2007).

38. 38.

Wozniak, A. S. et al. Characteristics of water-soluble organic carbon associated with aerosol particles in the eastern United States. Atmos. Environ. 46, 181–188 (2012).

39. 39.

Yan, C. Q. & Zheng, M. et al. Important fossil source contribution to brown carbon in Beijing during winter. Sci. Rep. 7, 43182, doi:10.1038/srep43182 (2017).

40. 40.

Zheng, M. et al. Seasonal trends in PM2.5 source contributions in Beijing, China. Atmos. Environ. 39, 3967–3976 (2005).

41. 41.

Liu, J. et al. Air pollutant emissions from Chinese households: A major and underappreciated ambient pollution source. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7756–7761 (2016).

42. 42.

Ramana, M. V. et al. Warming influenced by the ratio of black carbon to sulphate and the black-carbon source. Nat. Geosci. 3, 542–545 (2010).

43. 43.

Aggarwal, S. G. & Kawamura, K. Carbonaceous and inorganic composition in long-range atmospheric transported aerosols over northern Japan: Implication for aging of water soluble organic fraction. Atmos. Environ. 43, 2532–2540 (2009).

44. 44.

Irei, S. et al. Stable carbon isotope ratio of secondary particulate organic matter formed by photooxidation of toluene in indoor smog chamber. Atmos. Environ. 45, 856–862 (2011).

45. 45.

Aggarwal, S. G. & Kawamura, K. Molecular distributions and stable carbon isotopic compositions of dicarboxylic acids and related compounds in aerosols from Sapporo, Japan: Implications for photochemical aging during long-range atmospheric transport. J. Geophy. Res. Atmos. 113, D14301 (2008).

46. 46.

Anderson, R. S. et al. Carbon kinetic isotope effects in the gas-phase reactions of aromatic hydrocarbons with the OH radical at 296 ± 4 K. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L15108, doi:10.1029/2004GL020089 (2004).

47. 47.

Irei, S. et al. Laboratory studies of carbon kinetic isotope effects on the production mechanism of particulate phenolic compounds formed by toluene photooxidation: A tool to constrain reaction pathways. J. Phys. Chem. A. 119, 5–13 (2015).

48. 48.

Fisseha, R. et al. Stable carbon isotope composition of secondary organic aerosol from beta-pinene oxidation. J. Geophy. Res. Atmos. 114, D02304 (2009).

49. 49.

Fang, W. Z. et al. Thermal desorption/Tunable vacuum-ultraviolet time-of-flight photoionization aerosol mass spectrometry for investigating secondary organic aerosols in chamber experiments. Anal. Chem. 83, 9024–9032, doi:10.1021/ac201838e (2011).

50. 50.

Fang, W. Z. et al. Measurements of secondary organic aerosol formed from OH-initiated photo-oxidation of isoprene using on-line photoionization aerosol mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46(7), 3898–3904, doi:10.1021/es204669d (2012).

51. 51.

Fang, W. Z. et al. Online analysis of secondary organic aerosols from OH-initiated photooxidation and ozonolysis of α-pinene, β-pinene, Δ3-carene and d-limonene by thermal desorption–photoionisation aerosol mass spectrometry. Environ. Chem. 14(2), 75–90, doi:10.1071/EN16128 (2017).

52. 52.

Kroll, J. H. et al. Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of atmospheric organic aerosol. Nature Chemistry 3, 133–139 (2011).

53. 53.

Wang, G. et al. Dicarboxylic acids, metals and isotopic compositions of C and N in atmospheric aerosols from inland China: Implications for dust and coal burning emission and secondary aerosol formation. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 6087–6096 (2010).

54. 54.

Elmquist, M. et al. Distinct oxidative stabilities of char versus soot black carbon: Implications for quantification and environmental recalcitrance. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 20, GB2009 (2006).

55. 55.

Andreae, M. O. & Rosenfeld, D. Aerosol-cloud-precipitation interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols. Earth Sci. Rev. 89(1–2), 13–41 (2008).

56. 56.

Rudich, Y., Donahue, N. M. & Mentel, T. F. Aging of organic aerosol: Bridging the gap between laboratory and field studies. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 58, 321–352 (2007).

57. 57.

Kalberer, M. et al. Identification of polymers as major components of atmospheric organic aerosols. Science 303, 1659–1662 (2004).

58. 58.

Kim, S. W. et al. Aerosol optical, chemical, and physical properties at Gosan, Korea during Asian dust and pollution episodes in 2001. Atmos. Environ. 39, 39–50 (2005).

59. 59.

Kim, Y. et al. Aerosol properties and associated regional meteorology during winter pollution event at Gosan climate observatory, Korea. Atmos. Environ. 85, 9–17 (2014).

60. 60.

Birch, M. E. & Cary, R. A. Elemental carbon-based method for monitoring occupational exposures to particulate diesel exhaust. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 25, 221–241 (1996).

Acknowledgements

This work was supported from Swedish funding agencies FORMAS and STEM (the Swedish Energy Agency). W.F. additionally acknowledges EU financial support as Marie Curie individual fellow (contract number H2020-MSCA-IF-GA-2014–659529). S.K. was supported by the Korean Ministry of Environment as “Climate Change Correspondence”. We gratefully acknowledge Chaeyoon Cho, from Seoul National University, Taekyu Joo from Korea University, and Dr. Caiqin Yan from Peking University for assistance in sampling. The authors also appreciate the Korean NIER for providing PM2.5 data measured at Bongseong.

Author information

Authors

Contributions

A.A., M.Z., M.L., W.F., S.K. K.D., H.H., and Ö.G. conceived of the research and designed the sampling project; W.F., A.A. and Ö.G. designed the observation-based source apportionment. W.F. analyzed the samples and A.A. was in charge of MCMC simulation procedure. W.F. wrote the paper with contribution from all co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Örjan Gustafsson.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Fang, W., Andersson, A., Zheng, M. et al. Divergent Evolution of Carbonaceous Aerosols during Dispersal of East Asian Haze. Sci Rep 7, 10422 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-10766-4

• Accepted:

• Published:

• Air quality in megacity Delhi affected by countryside biomass burning

• Srinivas Bikkina
• , Elena N. Kirillova
• , Henry Holmstrand
• , Suresh Tiwari
• , A. K. Srivastava
• , D. S. Bisht
•  & Örjan Gustafsson

Nature Sustainability (2019)

• Source apportionment of carbonaceous aerosols during haze days in Shanghai based on dual carbon isotopes

• Nannan Wei
• , Zhiyou Xu
• , Guanghua Wang
• , Wei Liu
• , Deqing Zhouga
• , Detao Xiao
•  & Jian Yao

Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry (2019)

• Radiative forcing by light-absorbing aerosols of pyrogenetic iron oxides

• Akinori Ito
• , Guangxing Lin
•  & Joyce E. Penner

Scientific Reports (2018)