Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Highly hard yet toughened bcc-W coating by doping unexpectedly low B content


Either hardness or toughness has been the core interest in scientific exploration and technological pursuit for a long time. However, it is still a big challenge to enhance the hardness and toughness at the same time, since the improvement of one side is always at the expense of the other one. Here, we have succeeded in dealing with this pair of conflict based on tungsten (W) coating by doping boron (B) via magnetron co-sputtering. The results reveal that the introduction of low concentrations of B (6.3 at. %), in the doping regime, leads to the formation of W(B) supersaturated solid solution with refined grains. Meanwhile, the doping-induced higher compressive stress, higher H/E* and denser microstructure result in a surprising combination of improved hardness (2 × larger than pure W) and superior toughness (higher crack formation threshold compared to pure W). We believe this is an innovative sight to design new generation of transition-metal-based multifunctional coatings. Besides, our results are applicable for industrial application because it can be realized by simple manufacturing approaches, e.g. magnetron sputtering technology.


Hardness and toughness seem as a pair of conflicts1: the improvement of one side is at the expense of the other one. Nevertheless, it is of great importance for engineering application if a material exhibits both high hardness and toughness. Consequently, the work associated with simultaneously increasing these two properties is filled with challenge but significance. To date, this task has been well accomplished by embedding carbon nanotubes (CNTs) into brittle ceramics like silicon carbide2,3,4,5,6 and alumina7,8,9. In this way, as-synthesized composite materials exhibited both improved hardness and toughness, wherein the intrinsic attributes of CNTs dominates the strengthening and toughening effect. Besides, rare data for simultaneous investigation in terms of hardness and toughness has been available on alloying elements, instead, most efforts have been focused on improving the single aspect, either hardness or toughness. Just as the reports about the metal tungsten (W), which is not as hard as ceramics but exhibits brittle behavior10, 11. To improve its toughness, enormous attentions have been put on alloying W with transition metals like rhenium (Re)12, 13, iridium14, vanadium15 and tantalum16, etc. In which, Re attracts much attention since the tough W can be obtained on account of “Re ductilizing effect”17, this theory is based on optimized dislocation-core structure, along with lower Peierls stress. Nevertheless, its application is subject to a certain limitation when taking account of cost. In addition to the toughness enhancement, another important subject for W is to improve its hardness. Aiming at this point, some researchers employed the same method of alloying with other transition metals like Lu18 and V19. However, the strengthening efficiency is limited because the substitutional atoms can only cause slight lattice distortion and weak solid solution strengthening.

Recently, limited reports concerning metal films doped by few small atoms attract much attention. For instance, just incorporation of a small concentrations of B (5 at. %) by magnetron radio frequency sputtering into Cr film to form solid solute Cr(B) film, 2.6× increase in hardness can be obtained20. Similarly, Shang et al.21 have employed the same method to deposit Al film alloyed by 1.89 at. % B, and found that the film exhibited nearly 2-fold microhardness relative to pure Al. Besides, more phenomena relevant to the strengthening effect of suchlike alloying small atoms into metallic films could be traced to refs 22 and 23. Nearly all researchers attribute the attained hardening to fine grains and solid solution strengthening, which is supported by the fact that the interstitial atoms can cause more severe lattice distortion of matrix material in comparison with substitutional atoms. What is worth mentioning, in 2016, L. Hultman group23 have presented a beautiful work, they first reported the N-doped bcc-Cr films exhibiting the unique combination of high hardness and excellent toughness at low N concentrations, ~5 at. %. Particularly, the film was synthesized in virtue of specific high-power pulsed magnetron sputtering (HIPIMS)24. Through this deposited technology, synchronized Cr-ions rather than gas-ions irradiation can be monitored and predominantly selected to arrive at the growth surface, thus dense and atomically-smooth film with less lattice defect can be prepared. Inspired by the works above, for the transition metal W, two questions remain: (1) whether the hardness could be enhanced by addition of unexpectedly low level B content just through simple magnetron co-sputtering method? (2) As W is much brittle than Cr, could the small quantity of B atoms also improve the toughness?

Taking account of above questions, we deposited low-concentration B doped bcc-W (α-W(B)) coating via magnetron co-sputtering technology. Besides, pure W and W2B were prepared as references for comparison. Our studies revealed that the W film reinforced by 6.3 at. % B showed promising results: in comparison with pure W, 2-fold increase in hardness and drastically enhanced toughness can be achieved. Moreover, it is worth mentioning that such foreign-element doping is an effective approach not only for enhancing mechanical properties, but also for improving electrical25, 26, optical27, 28 and magnetic features29, 30 of materials, which are equally important for high technical products. Hence, our findings possess a certain scientific and applied values, and could help develop a new group of transition-metal-based multifunctional coatings.

Results and Discussion

Composition, chemical bonding and structure

According to pre-etching XPS results, we obtained 0, 6.3 and 24.4 at. % B content by regulating B target power to 0, 70 and 400 W, while W target power was kept constant at 70 W (Table 1). To further explore the chemical bonding structure between W and B, two typical core-level spectra in W4f and B1s energy regions are shown in Fig. 1a. In the W4f spectrum, the apparent double peaks for W4f7/2 and W4f5/2 can be observed, by means of Gaussian functions, they were deconvoluted into four peaks. Wherein two peaks located at 33.3 eV and 31.1 eV are considered as metallic W-W bonds31, while two other peaks centered at 33.5 and 31.5 eV can be assigned to W-B bonds, since a shift to high-energy side occurs when charges transfer from W to B. We note that only W-W bonds but no W-B bonds exist in the 6.3 at. % B-containing coating, and it can be further confirmed by the high noise level of the corresponding B1s spectrum, implying that all the B atoms occupy the interstitial sites of W lattice. When B content is 24.4 at. %, B1s spectrum exhibits a symmetrical binding energy peak at 187.7 eV, indicating that the single chemical state exists between W and B atoms, which is attributed to W-B bonds, while no B-B bonds exist in the film. Moreover, the 24.4 at. % B atoms in the coating can only to form sub-stoichiometric W2B phase, so it can be concluded that no interstitial B atoms exists in the coating with 24.4 at. % B.

Table 1 Experimental parameters, composition, grain sizes (D) and H/E* for all coatings.
Figure 1

(a) XPS W4f and B1s spectra for the coating with B content of 6.3, and 24.4 at. %. (b) XRD patterns for all coatings as a function of B content. (ce) HRTEM and corresponding SAED images (insets) formed at the coating with B content of 0 at. % (c), 6.3 at. % (d), 24.4 at. % (e).

Figure 1b exhibits the XRD pattern as a function of B content. For pure W, two sharp peaks at 2θ = 35.62° and 40.16° are related to (200) and (210) plane of body-centered cubic α-W (JCPDF:65-6453), respectively. With B content increasing to 6.3 at. %, α-W (200) peak disappears and only α-W (210) remains. Combined with its XPS result, we conclude that the single peak should be assigned to B doped α-W (α-W(B)), and the solute B atoms expand α-W lattice to make it shift towards lower Bragg-angle relative to the standard diffraction peak of α-W (210). It’s worth noting that this coating comprises supersaturated solid solution of W, as the solute B content (6.3 at. %) is far larger than the equilibrium solid solubility limit of W solid solution (<1 at. % B32). The formation of such supersaturated solid solution is due to the non-equilibrium characteristic of magnetron sputtering21. As B content increases to 24.4 at. %, the XRD pattern gives two new broad peaks at 2θ = 37.52° and 40.61°, which can be identified as (002) and (211) reflections of tetragonal γ-W2B (JCPDF: 25-0990), respectively, showing a good consistency with the XPS result. Notably, as-deposited W2B coating possesses extremely poor crystallinity. Here, grain sizes calculated roughly by Debye-Scherrer’s formula33 are depicted in Table 1. It is found that the average grain size decreases with increasing B content, from 15.3 nm for pure W to 8.6 nm for α-W(B), and decrease to 3.2 nm as the W2B coating was obtained.

To acquire more information about microstructure, we employed TEM analysis, as displayed in Fig. 1(c–e). In Fig. 1c, the pure W shows a large-area α-W (211) with interplanar spacing (d) of 0.130 nm from the HRTEM image, and the SAED pattern also confirm that the sample consists of α-W phase. When B content is 6.3 at. %, the inset still shows a typical α-W SAED pattern, without any sign of B or borides phase, meanwhile, the grain size identified by HRTEM image is around 10 nm, consistent with XRD result that the grain size is 8.6 nm. In contrast, the d 211 increases to 0.137 nm for the film with 6.3 at. % B, in agreement with the peak shift toward low angle in XRD, proving that a certain lattice expansion occurs due to the interstitial sites of W lattice are partially occupied by B atoms. As B content increases to 24.4 at. %, the diffraction ring (Fig. 1e) correspond to the pure W2B phase, but large-area amorphous phase appears in the HRTEM observation, which supports the XRD analysis. Notably, the d value of W2B (112) is 0.194 nm, slightly lower than the theoretical value at 0.204 nm (JCPDF: 25-0990). This is ascribed to the presence of large amount of B vacancies in W2B phase due to B deficiency.

Growth and morphology

To detect the effect of B doping on the coating growth, the cross-sectional SEM was performed on all samples, as can be seen from Fig. 2(a–c). For the pure W coating (Fig. 2a), the fine structure with ~20-nm diameter columns is revealed, which is typical for metallic films. But such structure is almost invisible in the coating with 6.3 at. % B (Fig. 2b), so that the cross-section observation shows nearly featureless except for some shallow dimples. With B content increasing to 24.4 at. % (Fig. 2c), the coating exhibits no-columnar but flat cross-section. Obviously, the addition of boron atoms into the W coating influences the microstructure evolution and results in the microstructure altering from columnar to featureless, accompanied with a denser microstructure. To understand if such columnar-featureless microstructure evolution correlates with the morphology of growing layers, atomic force microscopy (AFM) is carried out on each coating. The surface three-dimensional images of coatings with various B content are presented in Fig. 2(d–e), and the root-mean-square roughness (Rq) is also marked. It is found that the pure W possesses rather deep groove, which originates from the columnar structure, thereby the largest Rq of 3.15 nm can be obtained. When adding B atoms to pure W, the protuberances get less sharp, and Rq reduces slightly to 2.89 and 2.01 for α-W(B) and W2B, respectively. The deduced grain size (Table 1) may be responsible for such variation. Note that all coatings exhibit Rq values lower than 5 nm, thus relatively high-quality coatings were prepared.

Figure 2

(ac) Cross-sectional SEM images for the coatings with B content of 0 at. % (a), 6.3 at. % (b), 24.4 at. % (c). (d–f) AFM 3D micrographs in dimensions of 2 × 2 μm2, the root-mean-square roughness (Rq) is marked.

Effect of B doping on the hardness

To get reliable hardness, the calibration for fused silica standard sample was performed. As shown in Fig. 3a, the standard sample exhibits a steadily standard value at about 10 GPa as indentation depth increases, while the hardness for all specimens increases first then decreases gradually because as-deposited coatings tend to be affected by surface roughness and substrate. Hence, it is acceptable to take the hardness value at around 1/10 of impression depth to avoid the effects of surface and substrate. Figure 3b plots the hardness and elastic modulus for coatings with different B content. As B content increases, the hardness increases drastically and decreases afterwards. For pure W, the hardness is 14.1 ± 0.93 GPa, and the maximum value of 28.1 ± 0.79 GPa can be obtained in α-W(B) coating, it is far larger than pure W2B at 20.1 ± 1.29 GPa. The elastic modulus with B content follows the hardness to show a similar tendency.

Figure 3

Hardness-displacement curves for the fused silica standard sample and as-deposited coatings (a), hardness and Young modulous for the coatings as a function of B content (b), the internal stress data is added to inset (b).

As we known, internal stress (IS) is an important factor affecting the hardness of coating, it was calculated and displayed in the insert of Fig. 4b. The result shows that the IS is compressive stress in nature, and the IS of pure W, α-W(B) and W2B coatings is 0.04 ± 0.01, 1.23 ± 0.06 and 0.04 ± 0.04 GPa, respectively, following the same trend as the hardness. Based on d’Heurle’s model34, we know the bombardment effects of incident atoms or ions induce the generation of compressive stress during the film growing process. For pure W, the minimum stress at 0.40 ± 0.01 GPa can be obtained, as the ordered lattice can be arranged by only W atoms or ions, in this case, almost no defects or atoms displacement appear. As B content increases to 6.3 at. %, the α-W(B) coating exhibits the highest compressive stress at 1.23 ± 0.06 GPa, because all B atoms implant into the subsurface of film to occupy the interstitial positions of W, resulting in significant lattice expansion. For the W2B coating, a dropped stress value to 0.04 ± 0.04 GPa can be ascribed to the poor crystallinity caused by phase transformation from α-W(B) to W2B. Here, the compressive stress may provide partial contribution to the variation in hardness35. In comparison with pure W, the α-W(B) coating exhibits 2-fold increase in hardness. Based on above analysis of grain size, microstructure, and coating growth, it is rational to conclude that such high hardness is caused by the synergistic effect of finer grains of ~8.6 nm (fine-grain strengthening), supersaturated solid solution (solid solution hardening36), non-columnar growth and higher residual compressive stress. As B content further increases to 24.4 at. %, a dropped hardness to 20.1 ± 1.29 GPa can be obtained. And the intrinsically low hardness (lower than 20 GPa) estimated by Xiao et al.37 together with its defective lattice structure govern the lower hardness, although similar non-columnar features can be observed.

Figure 4

SEM images of the indentations developed on the coatings with B content of 0 at. % (a), 6.3 at. % (b), 24.4 at. % (c).

Effect of B doping on the toughness

In order to investigate the role of B on the toughness, nanoindentation and SEM have been performed on the coatings with different B content. The SEM images of the indentations for all samples are demonstrated in Fig. 4. It is found that pure W reference sample (Fig. 4a) exhibits severe radial crack, according with its intrinsically poor toughness, just as the yellow arrows illustrated. Surprisingly, a perfect impression without any radial crack is present in the coating with 6.3 at. % B (Fig. 4b), meaning that incorporation of solute B atoms enhances the metallic W toughness. However, the W2B coating with 24.4 at. % B (Fig. 4c) shows pronounced circumferential cracks and few radial cracks, that is different fracture mode occurs38.

As far as we know, the cracks can only nucleate when the stress at the tip of pre-existing flaw beyond crack formation stress of the material, the qualitative comparation can refer to following equation39:

$$\frac{{\sigma }_{{\rm{tip}}}}{{\sigma }_{applied}}=1+2\sqrt{\frac{a}{\rho }}$$

wherein 2a and ρ is the length of crack and tip radius, respectively, the ratio of σtipapplied denotes stress concentration factor, serving as an indication of crack formation threshold, and it can be drastically decreased through decreasing grain size or flaw size to nanometer dimensions, since the crack size is proportional to grain size. Hence, crack initiation requires higher applied stress (σapplied) if the grain size reduces40, that is the crack initiation becomes difficult. This concept may work in this work, wherein the mean grain size of α-W(B) coating is 8.6 nm, only half as many as that of W (~15.3 nm). Comparatively speaking, larger grains make pure W coating prefers to form cracks when applied the same load (~200 mN), besides, the representative columnar structure (Fig. 2a) facilitates the crack propagation. Thereby, higher crack formation threshold driven by finer grains exists in the α-W(B) coating. And the refined grains may produce more complicated grain boundary and induce the crack bending or branching, in parallel, more energy will be consumed to allow cracks to propagate. For the W2B coating, abundant circumferential cracks and few radial cracks appear, despite ultrafine grains (~3.1 nm) and denser microstructure are obtained, which is because that the formation of cracks is a complex process relating to not only the grain size and microstructure, but also other factors like mechanical properties (H, E*) and internal stress41, and the cracks result from a combined action of all factors.

It has been well established that the H/E* ratio is an important factor for evaluating the crack resistance of coatings, and higher H/E* (>0.1) could prevent radial cracks42,43,44,45. To investigate the different fracture mode between pure W and W2B coating, we further calculated the H/E* (E* = E/(1−υ2), υ = 0.25), as summarized in Table 1. It is found that the ratio increases from 0.066 ± 0.01, 0.102 ± 0.01 to 0.124 ± 0.02 with B content increasing from 0, 6.3 to 24.4 at. %, thus both α-W(B) and W2B coating, relative to pure W, tend to prevent the formation of radial cracks, since the two samples obtain similar H/E* value and larger than 0.1. Together with their denser microstructure (Fig. 2b,c), the radial cracks are suppressed. More importantly, the higher compressive stress (1.23 ± 0.06 GPa) in α-W(B) coating also contributes to suppress the formation of radial cracks41. Hence, the α-W(B) coating keep perfect indention without any cracks, but abundant circumferential cracks arise in the W2B coating. As shown in the XRD and HRTEM of Fig. (1b,e), the poor crystallinity combines with the emergence of amorphous in the W2B coating may be the reason for the existence of the circumferential cracks, just as reported that the amorphous film tends to create circular cracks41.


Here, we successfully prepared bcc-W coating doped by 6.3 at. % B (α-W(B)) via magnetron co-sputtering W and B targets. Besides, the other coatings including W, and W2B were synthesized further for comparison. The combined experiments of XPS, XRD and TEM confirmed the existence of α-W(B) single phase, and revealed its supersaturated solid solution feature. The addition of B atoms refines the W grains, decreasing the average grain size from 15.3 nm for pure W to 8.6 nm for α-W(B), and leads to higher compressive stress. Accordingly, the coating microstructure changes from columnar to featureless, along with relatively smooth surface. Based on the nanoindentation and SEM measurement, our studies reveal promising results: the incorporation of B in W film could remarkably improve its hardness from 14.1 ± 0.93 to 28.1 ± 0.79 GPa (2-fold increment than pure W), the synergetic contribution of fine-grain strengthening, solid solution hardening, denser microstructure and higher compressive stress governs the strengthening mechanism. The W2B coating possesses intrinsically low hardness (~20 GPa). Simultaneously, in comparison with pure W and W2B, the α-W(B) coating exhibits dramatically enhanced toughness (perfect impression without any crack), which can be mainly attributed to the higher crack formation threshold induced by finer grains, and the higher H/E* (>0.1) improving crack resistance. To sum up, such integrate of higher hardness and superior toughness could be realized by amazingly small (6.3 at. %) addition of B to W.


Deposition of α-W(B) with a thickness of around 700 nm was conducted on (100) oriented Si wafers by magnetron co-sputtering W (99.95%) and B (99.95%) targets in Ar. Prior to deposition, the substrates were successively ultrasonic cleaned in acetone, alcohol, and deionized water for 20 min respectively, and then mounted at 8 cm from targets. The background pressure was pumped down to 1.0 × 10−4 Pa, then the working pressure was controlled at 0.8 Pa with Ar flow rate of 32 sccm. During deposition, to tailor different B content in coatings, the radio frequency power inserted B target ranged in 0–400 W, while the direct current power linked to W target was kept constant at 70 W. The substrate bias, temperature and rotated speed was fixed at −60 V, 200 °C and 10 rpm, respectively.

The thickness and radius curvature of coatings were measured by a surface profiler (AMBIOS XP-2). Particularly, the reliable data about curvatures of all samples were got by averaging the minimum value of each eight measurements along two orthogonal surface directions, and outlier data points were rejected, subsequently, the total residual stress was calculated using the Stoney equation46. The composition and chemical structure in all coatings were investigated by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Perkin-Elmer PHI-5702), where sputtering cleaned by Ar+ for 500 s was carried out prior to XPS test. X-ray diffractometer (XRD, D8-tools) in θ–2θ configuration together with transmission electron microscopy (TEM, field emission JEOL 2010F) operated at 200 kV were employed to study their phase structures. The samples on the Cu grids for TEM analysis were spread with pieces of film peeled off from the surface slightly. To explore the growth condition of films when alloyed by B atoms, cross-section scanning electron microscope (SEM, SU8010) under 1-kV accelerate voltage and 8-cm working distance was carried out. Subsequently, the surface morphology was characterized by atomic force microscope using ScanAsyst mode in air (AFM, Dimension Icon, Veeco Instruments/Bruker, Germany). To determine the hardness for all samples, we introduced nanometer-scale indents (nanoindentation) into the material using MTS Nanoindenter XP in continuous stiffness mode42 with the maximum load of 200 mN, each test was performed on nine testing position to avoid data deviation, and the penetration depth of every indentation was set at 1000 nm. Meanwhile, the accurate hardness was guaranteed by standardizing the fused silica standard sample. And the impression overviews were acquired by SEM.


  1. 1.

    Ritchie, R. O. The conflicts between strength and toughness. Nat. Mater. 10, 817–822 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Wang, Y., Voronin, G. A., Zerda, T. W. & Winiarski, A. SiC–CNT nanocomposites: high pressure reaction synthesis and characterization. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 18, 275–282 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gubicza, J. et al. Microstructure of diamond–SiC nanocomposites determined by X-ray line profile analysis. Diam. Relat. Mater. 15, 1452–1456 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wang, Y. & Zerda, T. W. The mechanism of the solid-state reaction between carbon nanotubes and nanocrystalline silicon under high pressure and at high temperature. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 18, 2995–3003 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Wang, Y. & Zerda, T. W. Microstructure evaluations of carbon nanotube/diamond/silicon carbide nanostructured composites by size–strain line-broadening analysis methods. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 19, 356205 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ma, R. Z., Wu, J., Wei, B. Q., Liang, J. & Wu, D. H. Processing and properties of carbon nanotubes-nano-SiC ceramic. J. Mater. Sci. 33, 5243–5246 (1998).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Siegel, R. et al. Mechanical behavior of polymer and ceramic matrix nanocomposites. Scripta Mater. 44, 2061–2064 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Zhan, G. D., Kuntz, J. D., Wan, J. & Mukherjee, A. K. Single-wall carbon nanotubes as attractive toughening agents in alumina-based nanocomposites. Nat. Mater. 2, 38–42 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mo, C. B., Cha, S. I., Kim, K. T., Lee, K. H. & Hong, S. H. Fabrication of carbon nanotube reinforced alumina matrix nanocomposite by sol–gel process. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 395, 124–128 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dümmer, T., Lasalvia, J. C., Ravichandran, G. & Meyers, M. A. Effect of strain rate on plastic flow and failure in polycrystalline tungsten. Acta Mater. 46, 6267–6290 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Riedle, J., Gumbsch, P. & Fischmeister, H. F. Cleavage Anisotropy in Tungsten Single Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 3594–3597 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Wurster, S., Gludovatz, B. & Pippan, R. High temperature fracture experiments on tungsten–rhenium alloys. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 28, 692–697 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mutoh, Y., Ichikawa, K., Nagata, K. & Takeuchi, M. Effect of rhenium addition on fracture toughness of tungsten at elevated temperatures. J. Mater. Sci. 30, 770–775 (1995).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Luo, A., Jacobson, D. L. & Shin, K. S. Solution softening mechanism of iridium and rhenium in tungsten at room temperature. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 10, 107–114 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Hohe, J. & Gumbsch, P. On the potential of tungsten–vanadium composites for high temperature application with wide-range thermal operation window. J. Nucl. Mater. 400, 218–231 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Wurster, S., Gludovatz, B., Hoffmann, A. & Pippan, R. Fracture behaviour of tungsten–vanadium and tungsten–tantalum alloys and composites. J. Nucl. Mater. 413, 166–176 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Romaner, L., Ambrosch-Draxl, C. & Pippan, R. Effect of rhenium on the dislocation core structure in tungsten. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 195503 (2010).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Luo, L. et al. Microstructure and performance of rare earth element-strengthened plasma-facing tungsten material. Sci. Rep. 6, 32701 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Arshad, K. et al. Effects of vanadium concentration on the densification, microstructures and mechanical properties of tungsten vanadium alloys. J. Nucl. Mater. 455, 96–100 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mori, M., Shibayanagi, T., Maeda, M. & Naka, M. Characteristics of nanostructured Cr-B films produced by RF magnetron sputtering. Scripta Mater. 44, 2035–20382 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shang, H., Ma, B., Shi, K., Li, R. & Li, G. The strengthening effect of boron interstitial supersaturated solid solution on aluminum films. Mater. Lett. 192, 104–106 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Rebholz, C., Ziegele, H., Leyland, A. & Matthews, A. Structure, mechanical and tribological properties of nitrogen-containing chromium coatings prepared by reactive magnetron sputtering. Surf. Coat. Technol. 115, 222–229 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Greczynski, G. et al. Nitrogen-doped bcc-Cr films: Combining ceramic hardness with metallic toughness and conductivity. Scripta Mater. 122, 40–44 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Macák, K., Kouznetsov, V., Schneider, J., Helmersson, U. & Petrov, I. Ionized sputter deposition using an extremely high plasma density pulsed magnetron discharge. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 18, 1533–1537 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wu, J., Coffer, J. L., Wang, Y. & Schulze, R. Oxidized germanium as a broad-band sensitizer for er-doped SnO2 nanofibers. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 12–16 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wang, Y. et al. Anomalous Surface Doping Effect in Semiconductor Nanowires. J. Phys. Chem. C 121, 11824–11830 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Senter, R. A. et al. Structural influence of erbium centers on silicon nanocrystal phase transitions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 175502 (2004).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wu, J., Punchaipetch, P., Wallace, R. M. & Coffer, J. L. Fabrication and Optical Properties of Erbium-Doped Germanium Nanowires. Adv. Mater. 16, 1444–1448 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Schwartz, D. A., Norberg, N. S., Nguyen, Q. P., Parker, J. M. & Gamelin, D. R. Magnetic quantum dots: synthesis, spectroscopy, and magnetism of Co2+-and Ni2+-doped ZnO nanocrystals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 13205–13218 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Walsh, A., Da Silva, J. L. F. & Wei, S.-H. Theoretical description of carrier mediated magnetism in cobalt doped ZnO. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 256401 (2008).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wagner, C. D. & Muilenberg, G. E. Handbook of X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. (Perkin-Elmer, 1979).

  32. 32.

    Yin, J., Huang, Z., Liu, X., Zhang, Z. & Jiang, D. Microstructure, mechanical and thermal properties of in situ toughened boron carbide-based ceramic composites co-doped with tungsten carbide and pyrolytic carbon. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 33, 1647–1654 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Patterson, A. L. The Scherrer Formula for X-Ray Particle Size Determination. Phys. Rev. 56, 978–982 (1939).

    ADS  CAS  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    d’Heurle, F. M. & Harper, J. M. E. Note on the origin of intrinsic stresses in films deposited via evaporation and sputtering. Thin Solid Films 171, 81–92 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Zhang, S., Wang, H. L., Ong, S.-E., Sun, D. & Bui, X. L. Hard yet Tough Nanocomposite Coatings-Present Status and Future Trends. Plasma Proc. Polym. 4, 219–228 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gao, F. Hardness of cubic solid solutions. Sci. Rep. 7, 40276 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Xiao, B. et al. The elasticity, bond hardness and thermodynamic properties of X2B (X = Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Mo, W) investigated by DFT theory. Physica B 405, 1274–1278 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Cook, R. F. & Pharr, G. M. Direct observation and analysis of indentation cracking in glasses and ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 787–817 (1990).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Anderson, T. L. Fracture Mechanics. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1995).

  40. 40.

    Zhang, S., Sun, D., Fu, Y. & Du, H. Toughening of hard nanostructural thin films: a critical review. Surf. Coat. Technol. 198, 2–8 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Jirout, M. & Musil, J. Effect of addition of Cu into ZrOx film on its properties. Surf. Coat. Technol. 200, 6792–6800 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Wang, Q. et al. Study on the crack resistance of CrBN composite coatings via nano-indentation and scratch tests. J. Alloy. Compd. 708, 1103–1109 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Musil, J. Hard nanocomposite coatings: Thermal stability, oxidation resistance and toughness. Surf. Coat. Technol. 207, 50–65 (2012).

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Blažek, J., Musil, J., Stupka, P., Čerstvý, R. & Houška, J. Properties of nanocrystalline Al–Cu–O films reactively sputtered by DC pulse dual magnetron. Appl. Surf. Sci. 258, 1762–1767 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Musil, J. et al. The effect of addition of Al in ZrO2 thin film on its resistance to cracking. Surf. Coat. Technol. 207, 355–360 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Pureza, J. M., Lacerda, M. M., De Oliveira, A. L., Fragalli, J. F. & Zanon, R. A. S. Enhancing accuracy to Stoney equation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 6426–6428 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The support from National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFA0200400), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos 51602122,51672101,51572104), the China postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2016M600229), Science and Technology Development program of Jilin province (Grant no. 20170520120JH), the 46th Research Institute of China Electronics Technology Group Corporation is highly appreciated.

Author information




K.Z. and W.T.Z. conceived and designed the experiment, L.N.Y. performed this experiment. X.C.L., Z.P.H., C.Q.H., C.G. and X.Q.C. helped with the measurements (XPS, XRD, TEM, nanoindention and SEM). M.W. aided with the TEM data analysis. K.Z. and L.N.Y. wrote the article. All authors have communicated on the results and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kan Zhang or Weitao Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, L., Zhang, K., Wen, M. et al. Highly hard yet toughened bcc-W coating by doping unexpectedly low B content. Sci Rep 7, 9353 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing