Article | Open | Published:

Polymyxin B containing polyion complex (PIC) nanoparticles: Improving the antimicrobial activity by tailoring the degree of polymerisation of the inert component

Scientific Reportsvolume 7, Article number: 9396 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Here, we describe the preparation and characterisation of polyion complex (PIC) nanoparticles containing last resort antimicrobial polymyxin B (Pol-B). PIC nanoparticles were prepared with poly(styrene sulphonate) (PSS) as an inert component, across a range of degrees of polymerisation to evaluate the effect that multivalency of this electrolyte has on the stability and antimicrobial activity of these nanoparticles. Our results demonstrate that while nanoparticles prepared with longer polyelectrolytes are more stable under simulated physiological conditions, those prepared with shorter polyelectrolytes have a higher antimicrobial activity. Tailoring the degree of polymerisation and the ratio of the components we have been able to identify a formulation that shows a sustained inhibitory effect on the growth of P. aeruginosa and can reduce the number of viable colonies of this pathogen over 10,000 times more effectively than our previously reported formulation.

Introduction

Polyion complex (PIC) particles, also known as polyelectrolyte complexes (PECs) or interpolyelectrolyte complexes (IPECs), are soft colloids formed by the spontaneous aggregation of oppositely charged polyelectrolytes in aqueous media1,2,3. Due to their straightforward preparation and versatility, PIC particles are particularly suited for the delivery of charged (bio)molecules (e.g. nucleic acids and proteins), which are prevalent in nature3,4,5. This way, delivery vehicles can be formulated without the need to introduce chemical modifications to these (bio)molecules and as a result, the biological activity of these therapeutics should be maintained upon release. PIC particle formation and stability are dominated by entropic effects6 making them ideal for the delivery of “large” and densely charged macromolecules such as nucleic acids3, 7, 8. More challenging is the use of PIC particles for the delivery of proteins9, 10, peptides11 or small molecules3, which often lack the required charge density to form stable PIC particles. However, many of the characteristics of PIC particles makes them ideally suited for the delivery of antimicrobial peptides, which are small cationic peptides that have been harnessed as last-resort antimicrobials or as alternatives to current antibiotics12,13,14. The cationic residues in antimicrobial peptides can be shielded within PIC particles15,16,17,18, thus minimising the toxicity towards the host associated with the cationic and amphiphilic nature of antimicrobial peptides12,13,14, 19, 20. With the increasing concern of antimicrobial resistance, new ways of employing antimicrobials are highly desired, either through repurposing “old” antibiotics, or finding better ways of using current antimicrobials21, 22. In this regard, encapsulation of antimicrobials in polymeric nanomaterials can offer several advantages, including decreasing toxicity, improving bioavailability, increasing circulation time, or improving penetration in infected tissues23,24,25. In applications such as wound healing, a sustained release of the antimicrobial may be desirable, to maintain a therapeutic level of the antimicrobial throughout the treatment.

In our laboratories, we have recently developed PIC nanoparticles loaded with the clinically approved antibiotic polymyxin B (Pol-B)26,27,28,29,30 by complexation with FDA approved poly(styrene sulphonate) (PSS)15. Both Pol-B and PSS are strong polyelectrolytes (pK a H 9–1031 and pK a −2.532 respectively) and fully charged at neutral pH, making them ideal components for the formulation of PIC nanoparticles. These Pol-B containing nanoparticles displayed a moderate antimicrobial effect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an opportunistic Gram-negative bacterium, for which Pol-B is currently used as a last resort antimicrobial. Based on the correlation between the stability of PIC particles and the net charge of their consisting polyelectrolytes, the formulation of Pol-B with shorter polyelectrolytes can potentially result in more permeable PIC nanoparticles with stronger antimicrobial properties.

In this communication, we describe how the antimicrobial activity of these Pol-B containing PIC nanoparticles has been significantly improved by tailoring the molecular weight of the inert component, PSS. First, we investigate the effect that reducing the degree of polymerisation of PSS (i.e. molecular weight) has on the stability of the formed nanoparticles under simulated physiological conditions and in growth medium. Then, we evaluate the antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa of the resulting Pol-B containing PIC nanoparticles. Our results indicate that nanoparticles prepared with shorter PSS are less stable under simulated physiological conditions but result in significantly higher antimicrobial activities, and leads to the identification of a formulation that shows a sustained inhibitory effect on the growth of P. aeruginosa and that reduces the number of viable colonies of this pathogen more effectively than our previously reported formulation.

Experimental

Materials

Polymyxin B sulphate (Pol-B) was purchased from Alfa Aesar®. Sodium poly(styrene sulphonate) (PSS) of 32, 17 and 10 kDa average Mw (GPC standards), 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES), phosphotungstic acid hydrate, agar and Luria Bertani (LB) broth (Miller) were bought from Sigma-Aldrich Ltd. Nylon 0.45 µm syringe filters were purchased from Camlab Ltd. Carbon-coated nickel TEM grids (200 mesh) were purchased from Agar Scientific Ltd. Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS), 9.5 mM in phosphate and without Ca2+ and Mg2+, was bought from Lonza.

Instrumentation

Dynamic light scattering (DLS) and ζ-potential measurements were carried out in a Zetasizer Nano ZSP (Malvern Instruments Ltd.) stabilised at 37 °C. DLS was read at 173° (backscattering) for 60 seconds in triplicate and ζ-potentials were recorded 30 times at 140 V. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) images of PIC nanoparticles were acquired on a JEM-1200EX (JEOL USA Inc.). PIC nanoparticle size was measured from TEM micrographs using ImageJ software (1.48 v) and measuring each nanoparticle twice: both in their longest and shortest diameters. A Loctite® LED flood array (Henkel Ltd.) operating at 405 nm was used to sterilise the samples studied in the bacterial growth experiment. A FLUOstar Omega (BMG Labtech GmbH.) microplate reader was used to incubate and measure the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) in the bacterial growth experiments. Pictures of agar plates were taken on a ChemiDocTM MP imaging system (Bio-Rad laboratories Inc.).

Preparation of PIC nanoparticles

PIC nanoparticles from Pol-B and PSS were prepared following the protocol previously described by our group15, 33. The different formulations of PIC nanoparticles are defined by their [n+/n−] ratio, which represents the proportion of ammonium groups in Pol-B over acidic groups in PSS. As a representative example, for the preparation of PIC nanoparticles at 0.5 [n+/n−] ratio, solutions of Pol-B (0.25 mM) and PSS (2.5 mM in monomer units) were prepared separately in 5 mM HEPES buffer at pH 7.4. Then, both stock solutions were filtered through 0.45 µm nylon syringe filters and mixed in equal amounts drop-wise under stirring. PIC nanoparticles at other [n+/n−] ratios were obtained by changing the concentration of the Pol-B stock solution and mixing with 2.5 mM PSS following the same protocol. After 24 h, the polyion mixtures were characterised by DLS and ζ-potential without prior dilution nor filtration (Table S1†).

TEM imaging of PIC nanoparticles

For TEM analysis, 5 µL of a suspension of PIC nanoparticles were deposited on the surface of the TEM grid and it was left to dry at room temperature covered from dust. Once dried, 5 µL of a 1 mg·mL−1 solution of phosphotungstic acid in water were deposited on the grid to stain the nanoparticles for a minute, after which the excess staining solution was removed. Finally, the grid was dried as before.

Stability of PIC nanoparticles in simulated physiological conditions

To a sample of PIC nanoparticles (1 mL), prepared as described above, 182 μL of a 1 M solution of NaCl in water was added and the mixture was incubated at 37 °C to obtain physiological osmotic pressure and temperature. Every hour, the sample was analysed by DLS as described above.

Pol-B diffusion during dialysis

2.5 mL (or 1.2 mL for Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter units) of a 175 μM solutions of Pol-B in 5 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.4 were transferred into pre-conditioned dialysis devices (Float-a-Lyzer® G2 or Amicon), and were dialysed against 15 mL (or 8 mL for Amicon) of DPBS at 37 °C under stirring. 500 μL of dialysate were taken at different time points and replaced with fresh DPBS. The dialysate samples were analysed by HPLC using an adaptation of the method previously reported by Orwa et al.34, using a 50:23:22:5 mixture of 50 mM Na2SO4 in H2O: H2O: AcCN: 5% (v/v) dilution of 85% (m/m) H3PO4 in H2O running at 1 mL/min. 3 replicates were studied under the same conditions. At every time point, the area under the peak of Pol-B found in each dialysate sample was normalised to the area found in a non-dialysed solution of Pol-B prepared at the same concentration and diluted with 15 mL of DPBS (100% release).

Antimicrobial evaluation of PIC nanoparticles: Growth curves

100 μL aliquots of P. aeruginosa PAO1V35 cultures in LB broth (OD600 = 0.2) were loaded in the designated positions of a 96-well microplate. These bacterial cultures were mixed with 100 μL of PIC nanoparticles or free Pol-B in 5 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.4 to compare the antimicrobial activity of free and complexed (within PIC nanoparticles) Pol-B at the same concentration. Alternatively, these bacterial cultures were mixed with 100 μL of 5 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.4 as positive growth control or 1.25 mM (in monomer units) PSS in 5 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.4. to evaluate the effect of the polymers alone. Finally, 200 μL of a 1:1 mixture of the LB broth and 5 mM HEPES buffer pH 7.4 were also loaded in the microplate to confirm the sterility of the medium. All samples were prepared in triplicate, with mean values and standard deviations reported. The microplate was incubated at 37 °C and orbital shaking, and the OD600 was monitored every 30 min for 24 h. The samples of PIC nanoparticles, free Pol-B, PSS and 5 mM HEPES buffer 7.4 were sterilised prior to this experiment by exposure to blue light (405 nm) for 2 h at a distance of 15 cm from the light source.

Antimicrobial evaluation of PIC nanoparticles: CFU counting

After 24 h, 10 µL of the samples from the ‘growth curve’ experiment (see above) were spotted in triplicate on LB agar plates in serial dilution, from undiluted to 102, 104 and 106-fold dilutions. These agar plates were then incubated at 37 °C. After 18 h of incubation, the agar plates were photographed and bacterial concentrations in CFU·mL−1 were calculated from the highest dilution that showed individual colonies.

Results and Discussion

We have recently reported the preparation of PIC nanoparticles via self-assembly of the cationic antibiotic polymyxin B (Pol-B) and the polyanion poly(styrene sulphonate) (PSS)15. These nanoparticles displayed a formulation-dependent antimicrobial effect against P. aeruginosa, and can be an alternative delivery vehicle to the conventional use of antibiotics. Although the complexation of Pol-B is challenging due to its low net charge or multivalency (Fig. 1)36, this antibiotic was successfully assembled into PIC nanoparticles using a very high molecular weight PSS (70 kDa). The low multivalency of pentacationic Pol-B was compensated with PSS chains bearing ca. 340 charges on average, forming a highly multivalent network of electrostatic cross-links that stabilised these PIC nanoparticles. However, these nanoparticles showed moderate antimicrobial activity and our results suggested that the antimicrobial activity of the nanoparticles was related to the stability of the nanoparticles in the assay growth medium.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the formation of PIC nanoparticles by self-assembly of cationic polymyxin B with poly(styrene sulphonate) (PSS) and effect of the change in multivalency.

Since the stability of PIC particles in solution strongly depends on the multivalency of their constitutive polyelectrolytes3, we propose here that the complexation of Pol-B with shorter PSS would lead to less stable polyelectrolyte complexes with potentially faster Pol-B release profiles and higher antimicrobial activities. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the assembly of PIC nanoparticles from Pol-B and PSS with average molecular weights below 70 kDa. We selected commercial PSS sources of 30 and 15 kDa to test polymers with approximately half and a fourth of the Mw previously reported. Moreover, the shortest commercially available PSS (10 kDa) was also tested (Table 1).

Table 1 Polyanions investigated in this work.

Pol-B was therefore mixed with each PSS in ten different proportions (i.e. charge ratios), denoted as [n+/n−], indicating the number of ammonium groups in Pol-B divided by the number of sulphonates in PSS present in each nanoparticle formulation. The evaluation of a range of charge ratios is critical because this parameter not only dictates the dose of antibiotic loaded inside these nanoparticles, but it can also affect their stability in solution3. Nanoparticles were used as prepared without further purification, in a similar fashion to those previously reported using 70 kDa PSS15. In the absence of additional steps to stabilise the particles (e.g. cross-linking), PIC particles are always present as a mixture with the individual components. Any attempt to remove loosely bound drug will result in the destabilisation of the system, particularly for PIC particles like the ones reported here that employ polyelectrolytes with low multivalency. We anticipate that, upon application, any Pol-B that is free or loosely bound to the particles would have an immediate effect on P. aeruginosa, while the nanoparticles would act as a reservoir of the drug, maintaining therapeutic levels of the antimicrobial. The range of [n+/n−] ratios explored here was selected from our previous observations with a 70 kDa PSS and Pol-B, which formed unstable complexes that flocculated at values of [n+/n−] ≥ 1 due to the complete neutralisation of the PSS chains by Pol-B15. Thus, we decided to explore [n+/n−] ratios between 1.0 and 0.1 and the resulting nanoparticle formulations were characterised by DLS and ζ-potential (Fig. 2, Table S1†). Colloidal particles were obtained for most of these formulations even when as few as 0.1 equivalents of Pol-B were employed. As observed for other polyelectrolytes37, 38, we were not able to form PIC nanoparticles with any of the PSS tested at [n+/n−] ratios around equimolar range (i.e. 1.0, 0.9, and even 0.8 for the highest Mw PSS tested here, PSSH), which led to unstable aggregates that flocculated due to charge neutralisation (Fig. 2).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Hydrodynamic diameter (D H , ) and ζ-potential () of PIC nanoparticles prepared at different [n+/n−] ratios from Pol-B and PSSH (A), PSSM (B), and PSSL (C). Blank spaces indicate unstable formulations that flocculated. Each value represents the mean diameter or charge of the only size or charge population fitted by the software ± its standard deviation.

All nanoparticles prepared from PSS showed almost identical hydrodynamic diameters (D H ) and ζ-potentials regardless of the DP of the polymer, with average values of 192 nm (±4%)39 in D H and −49.6 mV (±6%)39 in charge (Fig. 2). These values were in agreement with those previously reported for 70 kDa PSS15. Representative formulations were analysed using TEM to assess whether such loose complexes would still retain morphological features of a nanoparticle. Spherical aggregates were found by TEM for nanoparticles prepared with the longest PSS investigated at a 0.4 [n+/n−] ratio (Fig. 3). The size of these PIC nanoparticles when analysed by TEM (267 ± 72 nm, n = 90) was bigger than their D H in solution (119 nm ± 28%), suggesting that they could be collapsing upon drying during sample preparation for TEM analysis40. TEM imaging of nanoparticles prepared at the same ratio for the shortest PSS evaluated did not reveal any clear morphology (Fig. S1†), suggesting that these nanoparticles were not stable during the TEM sample preparation.

Figure 3
Figure 3

TEM micrographs of PIC nanoparticles prepared from Pol-B and PSSH at a 0.4 [n+/n−] ratio (AC) and the size distribution of these nanoparticles found by TEM (D). Scale bars from left to right: 0.5 (A), 0.5 (B) and 0.2 μm (C).

We then focused on assessing the stability of the prepared PIC nanoparticles in physiological conditions. Since small electrolytes in solution can shield the ionic networks that cross-link PIC nanoparticles, it is expected that the salts present in biological fluids can compromise the integrity of these nanoparticles. In order to test their stability, all the formulations described above were incubated in 154 mM NaCl at 37 °C and pH 7.4 to simulate physiological conditions, and DLS was monitored over time. For clarity purposes, only the DLS data for PIC nanoparticles prepared at 0.7 and 0.4 [n+/n−] ratios will be discussed next, representing high and low Pol-B loading respectively. The DLS data for all the other nanoparticle formulations evaluated can be found in Fig. S2S4†, and overall showed very similar profiles to either 0.7 or 0.4 [n+/n−] ratios, depending on the value to which they were closer. Also, formulations at [n+/n−] ratios of 0.1 showed extremely poor stability to salt as expected from their low Pol-B loading and hence weak electrostatic cross-linking of the complex. All PIC nanoparticles swelled in the presence of 154 mM NaCl, due to an increase in electrostatic repulsion as small electrolytes shield the electrostatic attraction between the oppositely charged components of these nanomaterials. This process can be assisted by the association of nanoparticles as they become colloidally unstable, resulting in an overall increase in size41, 42. For the reported nanoparticles in this manuscript, this behaviour was strongly influenced by the DP of the polymer. Formulations containing the longest polyelectrolyte, PSSH, showed almost no changes in their autocorrelation functions (ACFs) and size distributions by DLS, with only a 2-fold increase in size after 4 hours (Fig. 4). However, PSSM and PSSL experienced more pronounced swelling, increasing 7 and 20 times their initial hydrodynamic diameters after 4 hours, respectively. Whereas PSSH did not show any difference between [n+/n−] ratios, probably due to the strong complexation of Pol-B by this polymer, PSSM and PSSL formed more stable complexes at a 0.4 [n+/n−] ratio than at 0.7. This lack of stability was evident from the loss of the characteristic sigmoidal profile in the ACF curves of these nanoparticles (e.g. Fig. 4B vs E), which can be attributed to these nanoparticles breaking down into amorphous debris, as suggested by the smaller-size population found in their intensity plots after 4 hours (Fig. 4B,C).

Figure 4
Figure 4

DLS autocorrelation function (ACF) curves and representative size-intensity plots (inset) of PIC nanoparticles prepared from PSSH (A,D), PSSM (B,E) and PSSL (C,F) at [n+/n−] ratios of 0.7 (AC) and 0.4 (DE) in the absence (control) and presence of 154 mM NaCl (1–4 hours).

Having characterised the stability under simulated physiological conditions of the different formulations prepared, we then evaluated the swelling and stability of these particles in the growth medium used for the antimicrobial assays. This behaviour can be inferred by measuring the changes to the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of particle suspensions in growth medium, as demonstrated in our previous work15. Experiments were focused on particles prepared at 0.7 and 0.4 [n+/n−] ratios, because the stability under physiological conditions demonstrated that these formulations were representative examples of the whole series. All nanoparticle formulations increased the OD600 when incubated in biological medium, and this effect was dependent on the Pol-B content and the degree of polymerisation of PSS (Fig. 5). Overall, formulations prepared at a 0.7 [n+/n−] ratio increased the turbidity of the medium much more dramatically than their analogues at 0.4, while decreasing the size of the polyelectrolyte resulted in formulations that increased the optical density of the medium faster and to a greater extent (e.g. OD600 up to 0.7 in the presence of nanoparticles prepared with PSSL at a 0.7 [n+/n−] ratio). For instance, nanoparticles prepared with PSSH at a 0.7 [n+/n−] ratio showed a steady increase in OD600, suggesting that these nanoparticles were swelling or aggregating, but remained stable under assay conditions. On the other hand, particles prepared with the smaller polyelectrolytes, PSSM and PSSL, showed a bigger increase in OD600, with nanoparticles prepared with PSSL giving an initial OD600 that was more than 3.5x bigger than that of the growth medium (Fig. 5). However, suspensions prepared with these smaller polyelectrolytes quickly lost their turbidity, suggesting that the nanoparticles were eventually breaking apart under these conditions and releasing the antimicrobial. The rate of degradation was also dependent on the DP of the PSS, with nanoparticles prepared at a 0.7 [n+/n−] ratio with PSSL recovering optical densities similar to that of the medium after 9 h, while up to 12 h were required for nanoparticles prepared under the same conditions with PSSM (Fig. 5, left). This data was in agreement with the stability observed under simulated physiological conditions (Fig. 4), with formulations prepared with PSSH giving more stable nanoparticles that swelled less.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Changes in OD600 for 1:1 LB:HEPES growth medium in the absence (A, ) and presence of PIC nanoparticles prepared at a 0.7 (A) and 0.4 (B) [n+/n−] ratio. Error bars represent the standard deviation, n = 3.

We then investigated the effect of PIC nanoparticles and their individual components on P. aeruginosa cultures by monitoring as well their OD600 over time. This is a routine technique used in microbiology that correlates any increase in the turbidity of a sample to bacterial growth43. The growth of P. aeruginosa was not inhibited by the presence of the polymers (Fig. S6†, PSSL and PSSH shown as representative examples), but incubation with Pol-B at the concentrations found in PIC nanoparticles at 0.7 and 0.4 [n+/n−] ratios (87.5 and 50 µM, respectively) completely inhibited the growth of this bacterium for the duration of this experiment (Fig. S6†). To facilitate the visual comparison of these antimicrobial results, the OD600 values of P. aeruginosa cultures in the presence of PIC nanoparticles were normalised against the optical density observed one hour after the start of the experiment, when the initial increase in OD600 attributed to PIC nanoparticle swelling had stabilised (Fig. 6A,B), and plotted as a function of the polymer and formulation used at representative time points (Fig. 6C).

Figure 6
Figure 6

Change in optical density at 600 nm (OD600) for P. aeruginosa cultures in the absence () and presence of PSS containing PIC nanoparticles prepared at 0.7 (A) or 0.4 (B) [n+/n−] ratios. Error bars represent the standard deviation, n = 3. (C) Representative relative changes in OD600 from P. aeruginosa cultures in the absence (+Control) and presence of PSS containing PIC nanoparticles prepared at 0.7 or 0.4 [n+/n−] ratios, indicated in brackets. **p < 0.01, ‘N/S’ = not significant (two-way ANOVA, Tukey test, CI = 95%). Error bars represent the standard deviation, n = 3.

Decreasing the DP of PSS had a dramatic effect on the antimicrobial activity of the nanoparticles. Our previously reported particles could inhibit the growth of P. aeruginosa up to 14.5 h15, and similar effects were observed with the nanoparticles prepared with PSSH and PSSM at a 0.7 [n+/n−] ratio (Fig. 6A). However, PIC nanoparticles prepared with the shortest polymer, PSSL, at the same [n+/n−] ratio showed a remarkable antimicrobial effect, with the turbidity at all times below that observed at the beginning of the experiment and no evidence of P. aeruginosa growth for the duration of the experiment (Fig. 6A,C). We believe this is a consequence of the lower stability of this formulation, that is able to maintain therapeutic levels of Pol-B throughout the duration of the experiment. Attempts to characterise the rate of release of Pol-B from these nanoparticles were compromised by the slow diffusion of this antimicrobial across the dialysis devices evaluated (Fig. S5), something we had observed for our previously reported nanoparticles15. Reducing the amount of antimicrobial had a detrimental effect on the antimicrobial activity of the nanoparticles, with formulations prepared with PSSL at a 0.4 [n+/n−] ratio showing signs of microbial growth after 20 hours of incubation (Fig. 6B and C). Nanoparticles prepared with PSSM and PSSH at this [n+/n−] ratio displayed an even weaker antimicrobial effect and after 14 hours the growth of the pathogen was evident again. Overall, nanoparticles containing PSSM and PSSH showed very similar antimicrobial activities regardless of their [n+/n−] ratio, and in general displayed no significant differences in the turbidity of bacterial cultures over time. These results are in agreement with the distinct physiological stability observed for these nanomaterials (Fig. 4), with PSSL at a 0.7 [n+/n−] ratio forming the least stable nanoparticles with the strongest antimicrobial activities across the range of DPs and [n+/n−] ratios tested.

Samples from these growth assays were collected after 24 hours of incubation and spotted on agar plates to quantify the number of viable bacteria remaining at this stage43. Several dilutions were spotted on agar plates to identify suitable conditions for colony counting. P. aeruginosa was able to grow under these conditions and we observed that PSSL (as a representative polymer) had no effect on this growth (Fig. 7A). Both concentrations of Pol-B used to prepare the nanoparticles completely eradicated P. aeruginosa from the culture (control). Interestingly, all formulations displayed some degree of bactericidal effect, as evidenced by the decrease of approximately two orders of magnitude in the number of viable bacterial colonies found for the least potent formulations. These results were similar to those observed before for the 70 kDa PSS15, that showed also a decrease of two orders of magnitude in microbial viability, and in agreement with turbidity experiments (Fig. 6). Nanoparticles prepared at a 0.7 [n+/n−] ratio with the shortest polyelectrolyte, PSSL, were again those that showed the biggest antimicrobial effect. Remarkably, the number of viable colonies for this formulation was reduced more than six orders of magnitude (Fig. 7B), suggesting that these nanoparticles were over 10,000 times more efficient in killing P. aeruginosa than any of the other ones we have reported.

Figure 7
Figure 7

(A) Representative agar plates used to evaluate antimicrobial activity of PIC nanoparticles prepared from PSS and Pol-B. Lane 1: No dilution, lane 2: 102-fold dilution, lane 3: 104-fold dilution, and lane 4: 106-fold dilution. (B) CFU/mL of P. aeruginosa in the absence (control) and presence of PIC nanoparticles prepared from different PSS sources at different [n+/n−] ratios, calculated from the colonies found in the agar plates (one-way ANOVA, Tukey test, CI = 95%). ‘N/S’ = not significant. Error bars represent the standard deviation, n = 3.

Conclusions

Here, we report the preparation and characterisation of Pol-B containing PIC nanoparticles using three different PSS selected across a wide range of degrees of polymerisation. We have assessed the physiological stability of these nanoparticles and their antimicrobial activity against P. aeruginosa, an opportunistic pathogen currently treated with Pol-B. Our results indicate that the antimicrobial activity of these nanoparticles can be significantly increased by tuning the degree of polymerisation of the polyelectrolyte component, in this case PSS. Nanoparticles prepared with the PSS with the smallest DP showed the highest antimicrobial activity. The antimicrobial activity of the nanoparticles prepared with PSS of this smallest degree of polymerisation was dependent of the [n+/n−] ratio, an effect not found in formulations prepared from longer polymers. Overall, tailoring the degree of polymerisation of PSS and the [n+/n−] ratio, we have been able to identify a PIC nanoparticle formulation that shows a sustained inhibitory effect in the growth of P. aeruginosa and can reduce the number of viable colonies of this pathogen significantly more effectively than our previous reported formulation. We believe our results highlight the importance of selecting a correct polyelectrolyte and formulation to tune the stability and antimicrobial activity, and should be of value in the future development of these materials as a platform for the delivery of last-resort antimicrobials. Our efforts to further develop these nanomaterials, and tailor composition, formulation and stability for in vivo and ex vivo applications will be reported in due course.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Pergushov, D. V., Müller, A. H. E. & Schacher, F. H. Micellar interpolyelectrolyte complexes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41, 6888–6901 (2012).

  2. 2.

    Yoon, H., Dell, E. J., Freyer, J. L., Campos, L. M. & Jang, W.-D. Polymeric supramolecular assemblies based on multivalent ionic interactions for biomedical applications. Polymer 55, 453–464 (2014).

  3. 3.

    Insua, I., Wilkinson, A. & Fernandez-Trillo, F. Polyion complex (PIC) particles: Preparation and biomedical applications. Eur. Polym. J. 81, 198–215 (2016).

  4. 4.

    Müller, M. In Polyelectrolyte Complexes in the Dispersed and Solid State II (ed. Müller, M.) 256, 197–260 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012).

  5. 5.

    Izumrudov, V. A. Soluble polyelectrolyte complexes of biopolymers. Polymer Science Series A 54, 513–520 (2012).

  6. 6.

    Fu, J. & Schlenoff, J. B. Driving Forces for Oppositely Charged Polyion Association in Aqueous Solutions: Enthalpic, Entropic, but Not Electrostatic. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 980–990 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Hashimoto, T. & Yamaoka, T. in Non-viral Gene Therapy 35–50 doi:10.1007/4-431-27879-6_4 (Springer-Verlag, 2005).

  8. 8.

    Wagner, E. In Nonviral Vectors for Gene Therapy Lipid- and Polymer-based Gene Transfer (eds Huang, L., Liu, D. & Wagner, E.) 88, 231–261 (Academic Press, 2014).

  9. 9.

    Kayitmazer, A. B., Seeman, D., Minsky, B. B., Dubin, P. L. & Xu, Y. Protein–polyelectrolyte interactions. Soft Matter 9, 2553–2583 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Xu, Y., Liu, M., Faisal, M., Si, Y. & Guo, Y. Selective protein complexation and coacervation by polyelectrolytes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 239, 158–167 (2017).

  11. 11.

    Du, A. W. & Stenzel, M. H. Drug Carriers for the Delivery of Therapeutic Peptides. Biomacromolecules 15, 1097–1114 (2014).

  12. 12.

    Hancock, R. E. W. & Sahl, H.-G. Antimicrobial and host-defense peptides as new anti-infective therapeutic strategies. Nat. Biotechnol. 24, 1551–1557 (2006).

  13. 13.

    Hurdle, J. G., O’Neill, A. J., Chopra, I. & Lee, R. E. Targeting bacterial membrane function: an underexploited mechanism for treating persistent infections. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 9, 62–75 (2011).

  14. 14.

    Yeung, A. T. Y., Gellatly, S. L. & Hancock, R. E. W. Multifunctional cationic host defence peptides and their clinical applications. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 68, 2161–2176 (2011).

  15. 15.

    Insua, I., Majok, S., Peacock, A. F. A., Krachler, A. M. & Fernandez-Trillo, F. Preparation and antimicrobial evaluation of polyion complex (PIC) nanoparticles loaded with polymyxin B. Eur. Polym. J. 87, 478–486 (2017).

  16. 16.

    Mohamed-Ahmed, A. H. A., Les, K. A., Seifert, K., Croft, S. L. & Brocchini, S. J. Noncovalent Complexation of Amphotericin-B with Poly(α-glutamic acid). Mol. Pharmaceutics 10, 940–950 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Les, K. A. et al. Poly(methacrylic acid) complexation of amphotericin B to treat neglected diseases. Polym. Chem. 5, 1037–1048 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Niece, K. L., Vaughan, A. D. & Devore, D. I. Graft copolymer polyelectrolyte complexes for delivery of cationic antimicrobial peptides. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 101, 2548–2558 (2013).

  19. 19.

    Urbán, P. et al. Nanotools for the delivery of antimicrobial peptides. Current Drug Targets 13, 1158–1172 (2012).

  20. 20.

    Carmona-Ribeiro, A. M. & de Melo Carrasco, L. Novel Formulations for Antimicrobial Peptides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15, 18040–18083 (2014).

  21. 21.

    O’Neill, J. The Wellcome TrustHM Government. Tackling Drug-resistant Infections Globally: Final Report And Recommendations. 1–84 (2016).

  22. 22.

    World Health Organization. Global action plan on antimicrobial resistance. World Health Organization Available at: http://www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/publications/global-action-plan/en/ (Accessed: 27 June 2017).

  23. 23.

    Parani, M., Lokhande, G., Singh, A. & Gaharwar, A. K. Engineered Nanomaterials for Infection Control and Healing Acute and Chronic Wounds. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 10049–10069 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Muñoz-Bonilla, A. & Fernández-García, M. The roadmap of antimicrobial polymeric materials in macromolecular nanotechnology. Eur. Polym. J. 65, 46–62 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Xiong, M.-H., Bao, Y., Yang, X.-Z., Zhu, Y.-H. & Wang, J. Delivery of antibiotics with polymeric particles. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 78, 63–76 (2014).

  26. 26.

    Falagas, M. E. & Kasiakou, S. K. Toxicity of polymyxins: a systematic review of the evidence from old and recent studies. Crit Care 10, R27 (2006).

  27. 27.

    Zavascki, A. P., Goldani, L. Z., Li, J. & Nation, R. L. Polymyxin B for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens: a critical review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60, 1206–1215 (2007).

  28. 28.

    Landman, D., Georgescu, C., Martin, D. A. & Quale, J. Polymyxins revisited. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 21, 449–465 (2008).

  29. 29.

    Azzopardi, E. A., Ferguson, E. L. & Thomas, D. W. Colistin past and future: a bibliographic analysis. J. Crit. Care 28, 219.e13–9 (2013).

  30. 30.

    Nation, R. L. et al. Framework for optimisation of the clinical use of colistin and polymyxin B: the Prato polymyxin consensus. Lancet Infect. Dis. 15, 225–234 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Calculated with Marvinsketch protonation plug-in, using macro mode at 298 K. Calculated pKaH values for each of the amines: 9.07, 9.54, 9.84, 10.02 and 10.24.

  32. 32.

    Evans, D. Evans pKa Table. Web Resource 1–6 (2005). Available at: http://evans.rc.fas.harvard.edu/pdf/evans_pKa_table.pdf (Accessed: 8 July 2015).

  33. 33.

    Insua, I. et al. Enzyme-responsive polyion complex (PIC) nanoparticles for the targeted delivery of antimicrobial polymers. Polym. Chem. 7, 2684–2690 (2016).

  34. 34.

    Orwa, J. A., Van Gerven, A., Roets, E. & Hoogmartens, J. Liquid chromatography of polymyxin B sulphate. J Chromatogr A 870, 237–243 (2000).

  35. 35.

    Cowell, B. A., Twining, S. S., Hobden, J. A., Kwong, M. S. F. & Fleiszig, S. M. J. Mutation of lasA and lasB reduces Pseudomonas aeruginosa invasion of epithelial cells. Microbiology (Reading, U. K.) 149, 2291–2299 (2003).

  36. 36.

    Zhang, Y. et al. The influence of ionic strength and mixing ratio on the colloidal stability of PDAC/PSS polyelectrolyte complexes. Soft Matter 11, 7392–7401 (2015).

  37. 37.

    Drogoz, A., David, L., Rochas, C., Domard, A. & Delair, T. Polyelectrolyte Complexes from Polysaccharides: Formation and Stoichiometry Monitoring. Langmuir 23, 10950–10958 (2007).

  38. 38.

    Feng, X., Pelton, R., Leduc, M. & Champ, S. Colloidal Complexes from Poly(vinyl amine) and Carboxymethyl Cellulose Mixtures. Langmuir 23, 2970–2976 (2007).

  39. 39.

    The dispersion from the mean DH and ζ-potential values indicated in brackets represent the coefficient of variation (%).

  40. 40.

    Friedrich, H., Frederik, P. M., de With, G. & Sommerdijk, N. A. J. M. Imaging of Self-Assembled Structures: Interpretation of TEM and Cryo-TEM Images. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 49 7850–7858 (2010).

  41. 41.

    Dautzenberg, H. Polyelectrolyte Complex Formation in Highly Aggregating Systems. 1. Effect of Salt: Polyelectrolyte Complex Formation in the Presence of NaCl. Macromolecules 30, 7810–7815 (1997).

  42. 42.

    Dautzenberg, H. & Rother, G. Response of Polyelectrolyte Complexes to Subsequent Addition of Sodium Chloride: Time-Dependent Static Light Scattering Studies. Macromol. Chem. Phys. 205, 114–121 (2004).

  43. 43.

    Prescotts Principles of Microbiology. (McGraw-Hill Higher Education).

Download references

Acknowledgements

F.F.T. thanks the University of Birmingham for the John Evans Fellowship. A.M.K. thanks the University of Birmingham for a Birmingham Fellowship. F.F.T. and A.M.K. thank the Wellcome Trust (177ISSFPP) for funding and FFT thanks the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) (EP/N508755/1) for funding. I.I. thanks the University of Birmingham and the John Evans Fellowship for a PhD studentship. The authors acknowledge support from the Centre for Chemical and Materials Analysis in the School of Chemistry at the University of Birmingham. The authors thank Dr Marie-Christine Jones and Dr Hannene Ali-Boucetta (School of Pharmacy, UoB) for the access to the DLS, and Nicolas Perez for useful discussions and help with the microbiology assays. The authors also thank Prof. Suzanne M. J. Fleiszig for the kind donation of P. aeruginosa strain PAO1V (Cowell, Microbiology 2003).

Author information

Author notes

    • Anne Marie Krachler

    Present address: Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, University of Texas McGovern Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

Affiliations

  1. School of Chemistry, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK

    • Ignacio Insua
    • , Laimdota Zizmare
    • , Anna F. A. Peacock
    •  & Francisco Fernandez-Trillo
  2. School of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK

    • Anne Marie Krachler
  3. Institute of Microbiology and Infection, University of Birmingham, B15 2TT, Birmingham, UK

    • Ignacio Insua
    • , Laimdota Zizmare
    • , Anne Marie Krachler
    •  & Francisco Fernandez-Trillo

Authors

  1. Search for Ignacio Insua in:

  2. Search for Laimdota Zizmare in:

  3. Search for Anna F. A. Peacock in:

  4. Search for Anne Marie Krachler in:

  5. Search for Francisco Fernandez-Trillo in:

Contributions

All authors contributed to the experimental set-up and discussed the results. I.I. and F.F.T. designed the nanoparticle synthesis and characterisation, and I.I., F.F.T. and A.M.K. designed the microbiological assays. L.Z. carried out Pol-B diffusion experiments across dialysis membranes and I.I. carried out all other experimental work. F.F.T. and A.M.K. secured funding. I.I. and F.F.T. analysed the data and wrote the paper, with all other authors contributing to the final version of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Fernandez-Trillo.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09667-3

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.