Abstract
Tumor protein p53 acts as a trans-activator that negatively regulates cell division by controlling a set of genes required for cell cycle regulation, making it a tumor suppressor in different types of tumors. Because the transcriptional activity of p53 plays an important role in the occurrence and development of tumors, reactivation of p53 transcriptional activity has been sought as a novel cancer therapeutic strategy. There is great interest in developing high-throughput assays to identify inhibitors of molecules that bind the transcription-activation domain of p53, especially for wt p53-containing tumors. In the present study, taking MDM2 as an example, a novel amplified luminescent proximity homogeneous assay (AlphaLISA) was modified from a binding competition assay to detect the interactions between the transcription-activation domain of p53 and its ligands. This assay can be adapted as a high-throughput assay for screening new inhibitors. A panel of well-known p53-MDM2 binding inhibitors was used to validate this method, and demonstrated its utility, sensitivity and robustness. In summary, we have developed a novel protein-protein interaction detection immunoassay that can be used in a high-throughput format to screen new drug candidates for reactivation of p53. This assay has been successfully validated through a series of p53-MDM2 binding inhibitors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The p53 protein, the guardian of the genome, plays an essential role in the regulation of cell cycle, apoptosis and DNA repair by defending cells against various cellular stresses, such as hypoxia and DNA damage1,2,3. P53 with impaired function can no longer protect the integrity of cell the genome and these cells are able to pass mutations to the next generation. As such, it is not surprising that p53 is associated with human tumor occurrence and growth4. Globally, there are approximately 22 million patients suffering from different kinds of cancer that are affected by p535. Approximately half of these patients bear wild-type p53 in tumor cells, but its function is impaired by negative regulators through degradation or inhibition6. Among these negative regulation motifs, binding of the transactivation domain (TAD) of p53, thus blocking its transcriptional activity, is crucial7, 8.
The full TAD of p53 is found in residues 1-93 and is composed of three subdomains including TAD1 (residues 1–40), TAD2 (residues 41–61), and the proline-rich domain (residues 61–93)9,10,11. Certain proteins have been found to bind one or both of the TAD domains and thereby inhibit p53 transcriptional activity. For example, it is well known that MDM2 is representative of a p53-negative regulator in which the N-terminal domain directly binds the TAD1 of p53 via a putative helix formed by residues 18–2612. Thus, reactivation of p53 by displacing MDM2, or other negative regulators, from wt p53 in cancer cells remains a goal for drug discovery in oncology. To date, some compounds, including nutlins13, spirooxindoles14 and benzodiazepinediones15, have been reported to disrupt MDM2 binding to the TAD of p53, but few studies target other p53-negative regulators, such as MDMX. In terms of tumor treatment, inhibitors targeting MDM2 or other negative regulators could be highly effective16, 17. Accordingly, it is necessary to identify cellular proteins that interact with the TAD of p53 and develop corresponding inhibitors to reactivate p53, which is an attractive therapeutic strategy for cancer therapy.
The purpose of this study is to develop a homogenous immunoassay, termed an AlphaLISA, for specifically monitoring total free p53 TAD, which can be widely used to detect the TAD binding to a variety of regulators via competition assay. Furthermore, this detection method could be applied to screen new inhibitors that disrupt the binding and reactivate p53. Because there is no need for blocking and washing steps, this homogenous assay is time- and labor-saving, and amenable to miniaturization in 384-well plate format for high-throughput screening18, 19. In contrast to the traditional approaches requiring purified proteins, AlphaLISA is not affected by other proteins in the cell lysate, making it much more convenient than traditional assays20,21,22,23. Here, we used MDM2 as an example to develop an AlphaLISA assay to measure interactions with p53 and further validated its ability to screen potential inhibitors by successfully identifying known p53-MDM2 binding inhibitors, such as Nutlin-3a.
Results and Discussion
Characterization of p53 TAD domain binding to the MDM2 ligand
The aim of our work was to establish a universal AlphaLISA assay to detect the interactions between the p53 TAD and its ligands, such as MDM2 and MDM4. In the AlphaLISA assay, donor beads and acceptor beads were connected, with the help of anti-His and anti-p53 antibodies, to p53-His protein, limiting the distance between donor bead and acceptor bead to less than 200 nm. Upon illumination at 680 nm, singlet oxygen produced by the donor beads diffused into the conjunct acceptor beads, resulting in the emission of light at 615 nm (Fig. 1a upper panel). However, if proteins like MDM2, which compete with anti-p53 antibody to interact with p53 TAD domain, are present in the solution, as shown in Fig. 1a lower panel, there are no acceptor beads in close proximity to the donor beads, and therefore no signal. Thus, the competition between anti-p53 antibody and proteins like MDM2 is a key challenge when developing this AlphaLISA assay.
Prior to the development of AlphaLISA assay, we performed experiments to validate the binding of p53 to MDM2 in the cellular extracts. Full-length p53 protein tagged with His at the C-terminus was isolated from HEK293T cells transfected with pEnter-p53, while MDM2 tagged with GST at the N-terminus was expressed in a prokaryotic system. As shown by western blot assays (Fig. 1b), p53-His could be pulled down by MDM2-GST but not by GST. This result indicates that p53 physically interacts with MDM2 in cellular extracts, which is consistent with previous studies24,25,26.
To characterize further the ability of the anti-p53 DO-1 antibody to disrupt the interaction between p53 and MDM2, we utilized another GST pulldown experiment. The reason for choosing anti-p53 DO-1 antibody was that it could recognize a part of the TAD at the N-terminal epitope mapping between amino acid residues 11-25 of human p5327. Indeed, the addition of anti-p53 DO-1 antibody led to a significant decrease in the amount of p53-His pulled down by MDM2-GST, whereas isotype IgG had no effect (Fig. 1b). Altogether, GST pulldown experiments suggest that p53-His, MDM2-GST and anti-p53 DO-1 antibody are a suitable system for development of TAD binding assays to support screening of new drugs.
Set-up of AlphaLISA to detect p53-His in cellular extracts
In order to set up the competition AlphaLISA, a conventional sandwich immunoassay to detect p53-His must first be developed. In a pretest, we evaluated the optimal amount of HEK293 cellular extracts containing p53-His using a matrix cross-titration of biotinylated anti-His antibody and HEK293 cellular extracts containing p53-His. Acceptor beads (2.5 μg/well) were incubated with differing amounts of biotinylated anti-His antibodies and HEK293 cellular extracts for 15 minutes28, after which donor beads (175 μl/well) were added. After a 15 minutes incubation, the AlphaLISA signals were detected and plotted against the concentration of biotinylated anti-His antibodies and HEK293 cellular extracts. As expected, the hook-effect, which was common when the beads were saturated with p53-His, was observed when the concentration exceeded 6.25 μg/well for HEK293 cellular extracts containing p53-His (Fig. 2a). In order to maintain a high assay signal and sensitivity, we selected 6.25 μg/well as the optimal HEK293 cellular extract concentration for subsequent experiments.
Because the immunoreaction time significantly influenced the development of fluorescence intensity, we studied the incubation time of acceptor beads, biotinylated anti-His antibodies and HEK293 cellular extracts. Experiments were carried out by adding 6.25 μg/well HEK293 cellular extracts with p53-His to acceptor beads and biotinylated anti-His antibodies. To create negative controls, the same amount of HEK293 cellular extracts, without p53-His, from HEK293 cells transfected with pEnter was used. AlphaLISA signals were measured every 5 min over the period of 5–25 min from the start of incubation, and the signal-to-background ratio (S/B) was calculated as a ratio of the AlphaLISA signal with positive and negative controls. Figure 2b shows that the S/B increases rapidly at first and reaches a maximum at 20 min. Hence, we selected 20 min as the immunoreaction time for further studies.
The amount of biotinylated anti-His antibody, acceptor beads conjugated with anti-p53 antibody and streptavidin-coated donor beads all affected the performance of the AlphaLISA assay. Therefore, a large series of different component concentrations was tested to determine optimal values of these components using the 20-minute reaction time. A range of biotinylated anti-His antibodies diluted in assay buffer (1:50, 1:75, 1:100, 1:125, 1:150, 1:175, 1:200) was explored. As shown in Fig. 2c, the S/B increased as the biotinylated antibodies decreased, but began falling when the dilution ratio was greater than 1:100 because the concentration of biotinylated antibodies was too low to bring p53-His and donor beads together. The dilution ratio of 1:100 for biotinylated anti-His antibody was chosen for use in all subsequent experiments. Various concentrations of acceptor beads ranging from 0.625 to 5 μg/well were tested to determine the optimal concentration. The resulting titration curve, shown in Fig. 2d, showed the hook effect when the concentration exceeded 2.5 μg/well. Therefore, a titration of the donor beads with 2.5 μg/well acceptor beads was performed (Fig. 2e). The S/B reached a maximum at a concentration of 150 μl/well. Consequently, the concentrations chosen for the acceptor and donor beads were 2.5 μg/well and 150 μl/well, respectively.
Additional parameters, such as the assay buffer and cell lysis buffer, were also analyzed and described in the Methods section. Ultimately, dose-response experiments using cellular extracts containing p53-His were performed using the optimized conditions. As shown in Fig. 2f, the dose-response curve revealed that the AlphaLISA assay developed was sensitive enough to detect differing amounts of p53-His in cellular extracts. Because the AlphaLISA assay is homogeneous, p53-His could be rapidly detected far more conveniently compared with conventional immunoassays, such as ELISA and western blot29,30,31. Additionally, the use of anti-p53 DO1 antibody allowed us to monitor total free TAD of p53-His, specifically, in cellular extracts. To our knowledge, this is the only homogeneous detection assay suitable for the high-throughput screening of ligands of the p53 TAD.
Development of competitive binding AlphaLISA to detect the interaction between p53 TAD and its ligands
The goal of the present study was to use AlphaLISA for the screening of new ligands of the p53 TAD. We measured the displacement of TAD from the anti-p53 antibody/p53-His complex by inhibiting this interaction with ligands of the TAD, such as MDM2, which should ultimately result in a decrease of the AlphaLISA signal. In order to assess the robustness of the ligand screening assay, Z′ factor (index of assay quality) and signal-to-background (S/B) ratio were calculated using a control plate into which 32 maximum controls using HEK293 cellular extract containing p53-His and 32 minimum controls using HEK293 cellular extract without p53-His were dispensed (Fig. 3a). The Z′ factor and signal-to-background ratio were calculated to be 0.88 and 167.98, respectively, which demonstrated that this AlphaLISA assay was robust and suitable for HTS32.
A competitive binding assay was used to validate the interaction between the p53 TAD and MDM2. A serial dilution series of cellular extracts containing MDM2-GST in assay buffer was prepared. The AlphaLISA assay was conducted in which the mixture, including acceptor beads, HEK293 cellular extracts containing p53-His, biotinylated anti-His antibody and cellular extracts containing MDM2-GST, was incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. Donor beads were added and the mixture was incubated for another 15 min. As a negative control, cellular extracts containing MDM2-GST were substituted by cellular extracts containing GST. The AlphaLISA signals were plotted against cellular extracts as shown in Fig. 3b. The dose response curve showed that the AlphaLISA signals decreased as the cellular extracts containing MDM2-GST increased, while the AlphaLISA signals of the negative control remained unchanged. Cellular extracts containing MDM4-GST were utilized to validate the interaction between p53 TAD and MDM433,34,35, in the same manner as described for MDM2. As shown in Fig. 3c, the AlphaLISA signals decreased rapidly over the range from 1.56 to 6.25 μg, but slowed when the amount exceeded 6.25 μg. In short, these dose response curves indicated a significant competition of MDM2/MDM4 with anti-p53 antibody for binding the TAD of p53.
Compared with conventional assays utilized to detect protein-protein interaction, such as co-immunoprecipitation and GST pulldown, the AlphaLISA assay presented in this study was sensitive, fast (35 min), and simple to perform. Compared with Tandem affinity purification (TAP) and Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR), this assay was user-friendly, inexpensive, and had acceptable sensitivity. The main advantage of this assay, compared with other methods, is that this technology is particularly well suited for high-throughput applications in cellular extracts and does not require purification.
Pharmacological validation of inhibitor screening AlphaLISA using known inhibitors of the p53-MDM2 interaction
HTS assays developed for drug discovery should be validated for pharmacological relevance and for assay performance. In the AlphaLISA assay utilized to screen inhibitors of the p53-MDM2 interaction, six different inhibitors (Table 1) known to disrupt p53-MDM2 binding13, 36,37,38,39,40 were tested at different concentrations to verify that they could release p53 TAD from MDM2, leading to increase in AlphaLISA signals. This would also validate that the assay was sensitive enough to detect the changes in a robust manner. As with the competitive binding assay, Z′ factor and signal-to-background ratio were calculated using 32 minimum controls using cellular extracts containing MDM2-GST and 32 maximum controls using cellular extracts containing GST. To reduce the amount of MDM2-GST used, while maintaining appropriate signal and sensitivity, 33.3 μg/well cellular extracts was used for the AlphaLISA assay. As shown in Fig. 4a, the Z′ factor and signal-to-background ratio were 0.70 and 2.60, respectively, indicating that the assay was robust.
To validate the capacity of this assay to screen inhibitors, six inhibitors of the p53-MDM2 interaction were prepared at a final concentration of 20 mM in DMSO and stored at −80 °C. On the basis of preliminary experiments, serial dilutions of nutlin-3a, idasanutlin and YH239-EE at a ratio of 1:5 starting with a 20 μM concentration were prepared in assay buffer, and MI-773, NVP-CGM097 and RG-7112 were prepared at a ratio of 1:10. Serial dilutions of inhibitors were added into the mixture of acceptor beads, cellular extracts containing p53-His, biotinylated antibody and cellular extracts containing MDM2-GST to generate a dose response curve. Serial dilutions of DMSO were added to gain the basal level of p53-MDM2 without inhibitor. All of the dose response curves depicted in Fig. 4 displayed increasing AlphaLISA signals along with increasing dosage of different inhibitors, but no change was seen using the DMSO negative control. Notably, while the signals of MI-773, NVP-CGM097 and RG-7112 ultimately reached a plateau when the concentration exceeded 1 μΜ, the response signals of nutlin-3a, idasanutlin and YH239-EE continued to rise rapidly. These results strongly suggest that the six inhibitors known to bind MDM2 can release the p53 TAD and that this HTS inhibitor screening assay had acceptable sensitivity to detect the changes of AlphaLISA signal caused by the actions of the inhibitors.
Confirming specificity of inhibitor screening AlphaLISA
To evaluate the specificity of the inhibitor screening assay, the six inhibitors of MDM2 used previously were examined to evaluate inhibition of p53-MDM4 interaction. The Z′ factor and signal-to-background ratio were 0.76 and 3.54, respectively, calculated from 32 minimum controls and 32 maximum controls in which 12.5 μg/well cellular extracts containing GST/MDM4-GST were used to achieve appropriate signal and sensitivity. These data indicated the suitability of this AlphaLISA assay for the HTS evaluation of inhibitors of p53-MDM4 interaction (Fig. 5a). The results of the assay conducted to test the six MDM2 inhibitors, shown in Fig. 5b, show that the AlphaLISA signals remain unchanged as the dose of inhibitor rose, identically to the signals of the DMSO negative control, indicating that inhibitors of MDM2 have no ability to affect the signal and that this AlphaLISA assay is highly specific.
Conclusion
The tumor suppressor protein p53 is a transcription factor that can be negatively regulated by its ligands, such as MDM2, through binding to the transcription domain of p53 in tumors41. Blocking interactions with MDM2 is a prime strategy for new cancer drug development. Multiple methods have been utilized to support the discovery of inhibitors of MDM242, but the development of assays for protein-protein interactions involving TAD domains has historically been slow, as has the development of inhibitor screening assays for other negative regulators.
In the present study, we have developed a novel, high-throughput screening amenable AlphaLISA assay to discover molecules in cellular extracts that interact with the transactivation domain of p53. This assay is simple, rapid, and more applicable to high-throughput formats, compared with conventional methods to identify protein-protein interactions. Importantly, the assay time is significantly reduced as compared to a sandwich AlphaLISA assay format43. Furthermore, this AlphaLISA assay was implemented as a universal method to screen rapidly inhibitors of targets that specifically bind to the p53 TAD. Although this inhibitor screening assay, based on cellular extracts, exhibited acceptable QC parameters, further improvement is needed to increase assay sensitivity and to develop this platform further as a cell-based assay. Altogether, we believe that the AlphaLISA immunoassay demonstrated in this work may have wide applications for the further development of anticancer therapeutics.
Methods
Reagents and Plasmids
4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid (MES), Sodium cyanoborohydride (NaBH3CN), Tween-20, Carboxy-methoxy lamine (CMO), Proclin-300, Dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), Biotinyl-N-hydroxy-succinimide (NHS-Biotin), protease inhibitor cocktail and PMSF were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Streptavidin-coated donor beads and unconjugated europium-acceptor beads were purchased from Beyondbiotech (Shanghai, China). Anti-p53 DO-1 and anti-MDM2 N-20 antibodies were obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), and anti-His monoclonal antibody was acquired from Bioworld Technology (St. Louis, USA). The open reading frame (ORF) encoding p53 was generated by RT-PCR amplification from 293T cells and subcloned into a pEnter plasmid (ViGene Biosciences, Rockville, USA) carrying a C-terminal 6 × his tag. GST (glutathione transferase) recombinant pGEX-4T-MDM2 plasmid was a kind gift from Mien-Chie Hung (The University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA)44. The sequences of both recombinant plasmids generated were verified by sequencing prior to use. All other reagents used were of analytical reagent grade and a Milli-Q water purification system (Millipore, MA, USA) was employed to supply ultra-pure water used throughout the experiments.
Cell culture and transfection
Human embryonic kidney cells (293T) were cultured at 37 °C (5% CO2) in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% GlutaMAX. 24 h prior to transfection, 1 × 106 cells were seeded in a 10 cm2 dish and transfected when about 70% confluent. After incubation for 10 minutes at room temperature, the dilution containing 10 µg pEnter-p53 and 20 µL jetPRIME transfection agent in 500 µL jetPRIME buffer was added to the cells and the dish was returned to the incubator. Four hours later, the transfection medium was replaced with fresh culture medium. Cells were cultured for 48 h post-transfection, washed twice with cold PBS and lysed with 1 ml of cell lysis buffer (20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100) containing PMSF and a protease inhibitor cocktail. After centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was aliquoted and stored at −80 °C until use.
Preparation of GST-MDM2 protein
To express recombinant MDM2 tagged with GST, Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells carrying pGEX-4T-MDM2 were grown in LB medium at 37 °C for 4 h. When the OD600 was about 0.8, the cells were induced with 1 mM IPTG overnight at 18 °C. Bacteria were collected by centrifugation at 5000 × g (15 min, 4 °C) and washed three times under the same conditions. The pellets were resuspended in PBS and lysed by three freeze-thaw cycles followed by sonication with 100 µM PMSF. Finally, the cellular extract was obtained by centrifugation at 20,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C to remove cellular debris. After identification by Coomassie blue staining, the supernatant was divided into Eppendorf tubes and stored at −80 °C.
Pulldown assay
To determine the interaction between p53 and MDM2 in vitro, a GST pulldown assay was preformed following the protocol described previously45. Briefly, Glutathione Sepharose 4B beads bound with GST or GST-MDM2 fusion protein were incubated with HEK-293T cellular extracts containing p53 with 6 × his tag for 3 h at 4 °C. After being washed three times, the bound proteins were eluted by boiling for 10 min and p53 protein content was analyzed by western blot. In order to identify competition of the anti-p53 DO-1 antibodies with MDM2 in binding to p53, another GST pulldown experiment was conducted as described above. The only difference between two experiments is that 2 µg anti-p53 DO-1 antibodies were added to the HEK-293T cellular extracts containing p53-His protein.
Biotinylation of anti-His antibodies
A 10 mM solution of NHS-Biotin was prepared by dissolving 3.4 mg NHS-Biotin in 1 ml DMSO. 100 µg anti-His monoclonal antibodies diluted in 196.7 µl PBS (pH 7.4) were mixed with 3.3 µl of the NHS-Biotin solution at a 1:50 molar ratio (antibody: biotin) and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. In order to remove excess biotin, the biotinylated antibodies were washed three times with PBS using Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters. The final concentration was adjusted to 0.5 mg/ml with PBS containing 0.1% NaN3.
Conjugation of anti-p53 antibodies to AlphaLISA acceptor beads
In order to conjugate anti-p53 antibodies to acceptor beads, 10% Tween-20, a fresh 400 mM NaBH3CN solution and 1 mg/ml antibodies were prepared in 100 mM MES buffer (pH 6.0). After washing the acceptor beads twice, 1 mg beads, 1.25 µl 10% Tween-20, 10 µl NaBH3CN solution and anti-p53 antibodies were mixed together and the total reaction volume was adjusted to 200 µl with MES buffer. The reaction solution was briefly sonicated and incubated at 37 °C using a rotary shaker. After 48 h, 10 µl fresh 65 mg/mL solution of carboxymethoxylamine (CMO) in 800 mM NaOH was added to the reaction and incubated for 1 hour to block the unreacted sites. The mixture was centrifuged at 15,000 g for 10 min and the bead pellet was washed thrice with PBS buffer. Finally, the acceptor beads were resuspended in 200 µl PBS buffer with 0.05% Proclin-300.
AlphaLISA detection assay
All AlphaLISA experiments were performed in white 96-well plates with an optimized assay buffer containing 25 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, 0.5% BSA, 0.1% Tween-20, 2 mg/ml Dextran-500, and 0.01% Proclin-300. Two sequential incubations were required in the assay which was initiated with the mixture of 25 µl each of conjugated acceptor beads, biotinylated anti-His antibodies and samples per well. The samples used in different experiments were prepared as follows: (a) different amounts of HEK293 cellular extracts containing p53-His used in the p53 detection assay; (b) 6.25 μg HEK293 cellular extracts containing p53-His and different amounts of cellular extracts containing GST-MDM2 used in the binding competition assay; (c) 6.25 μg HEK293 cellular extracts containing p53-His, 33.3 μg cellular extracts containing GST-MDM2 and different concentrations of inhibitors used in the inhibitor screening assay. After the first incubation of the mixture at 37 °C for 20 min, streptavidin-coated donor beads were added into the reaction solution and incubated under subdued lighting conditions at 37 °C for another 15 min. The AlphaLISA signals were measured with the Light Initiated Chemiluminescent Assay (LiCA) system (Beyond Diagnostics) with excitation and emission wavelengths set at 680 nm and 615 nm, respectively. The data of three independent trials in each experiment were analyzed and the results were plotted using GraphPad Prism. In order to optimize the assay, the signal-to-background ratio (S/B) was used to normalize multiple experiments. The Z′-factor calculated using the equation Z′ = 1 − (3 × SD of positive control + 3 × SD of negative control)/|mean of positive control–mean of negative control| was used to estimate the assay quality.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Hainaut, P. & Hollstein, M. P53 and human cancer: the first ten thousand mutations. Adv. Cancer Res. 77, 81–137 (2000).
Fridman, J. S. & Lowe, S. W. Control of apoptosis by p53. Oncogene 22, 9030–9040 (2003).
Vousden, K. H. & Prives, C. Blinded by the light: the growing complexity of p53. Cell 137, 413–431 (2009).
Vousden, K. H. & Lu, X. Live or let die: the cell’s response to p53. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 594–604 (2002).
Khoury, K. & Dömling, A. P53 MDM2 inhibitors. Curr. Pharm. Des. 18, 4668–4678 (2012).
Vassilev, L. T. Small-molecule antagonists of p53-MDM2 binding: research tools and potential therapeutics. Cell Cycle 3, 419–421 (2004).
Estrada-Ortiz, N., Neochoritis, C. G. & Dömling, A. How to design a successful p53-MDM2/X interaction inhibitor: a thorough overview based on crystal structures. ChemMedChem 11, 757–772 (2016).
Lee, J. H. et al. Protein grafting of p53TAD onto a leucine zipper scaffold generates a potent HDM dual inhibitor. Nat. Commun. 5, 3814 (2014).
Chang, J., Kim, D. H., Lee, S. W., Choi, K. Y. & Sung, Y. C. Transactivation ability of p53 transcriptional activation domain is directly related to the binding affinity to TATA-binding protein. J. Biol. Chem. 270, 25014–25019 (1995).
Wong, T. S. et al. Physical and functional interactions between human mitochondrial single-stranded DNA-binding protein and tumour suppressor p53. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 568–581 (2009).
Walker, K. K. & Levine, A. J. Identification of a novel p53 functional domain that is necessary for efficient growth suppression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93, 15335–15340 (1996).
Chi, S. W. et al. Structural details on MDM2-p53 interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 280, 38795–38802 (2005).
Vassilev, L. T. et al. In vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2. Science 303, 844–848 (2004).
Zhao, Y. et al. Diastereomeric spirooxindoles as highly potent and efficacious MDM2 inhibitors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135, 7223–7234 (2013).
Grasberger, B. L. et al. Discovery and cocrystal structure of benzodiazepinedione HDM2 antagonists that activate p53 in cells. J. Med. Chem. 48, 909–912 (2005).
Gembarska, A. et al. MDM4 is a key therapeutic target in cutaneous melanoma. Nat. Med. 18, 1239–1247 (2012).
Khoury, K., Popowicz, G. M., Holak, T. A. & Dömling, A. The p53-MDM2/MDMX axis - A chemotype perspective. MedChemComm 2, 246–260 (2011).
Bielefeld-Sevigny, M. AlphaLISA immunoassay platform — the ‘no-wash’ high-throughput alternative to ELISA. Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 7, 90–92 (2009).
Szekeres, P. G., Leong, K., Day, T. A., Kingston, A. E. & Karran, E. H. Development of homogeneous 384-well high-throughput screening assays for Abeta1-40 and Abeta1-42 using AlphaScreen technology. J. Biomol. Screen. 13, 101–111 (2008).
Waller, H., Chatterji, U., Gallay, P., Parkinson, T. & Targett-Adams, P. The use of AlphaLISA technology to detect interaction between hepatitis C virus-encoded NS5A and cyclophilin A. J. Virol. Methods 165, 202–210 (2010).
Dehdashti, S. J. et al. A high-throughput screening assay for determining cellular levels of total tau protein. Curr. Alzheimer Res. 10, 679–687 (2013).
Qian, J., Lu, L., Wu, J. & Ma, H. Development of multiple cell-based assays for the detection of histone h3 lys27 trimethylation (h3k27me3). Assay Drug Dev. Technol. 11, 449–456 (2013).
Zhan, Y. et al. Development of novel cellular histone-binding and chromatin-displacement assays for bromodomain drug discovery. Epigenetics Chromatin 8, 37 (2015).
Chen, J., Marechal, V. & Levine, A. J. Mapping of the p53 and mdm-2 interaction domains. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13, 4107–4114 (1993).
Kussie, P. H. et al. Structure of the MDM2 oncoprotein bound to the p53 tumor suppressor transactivation domain. Science 274, 948–953 (1996).
Moll, U. M. & Petrenko, O. The MDM2-p53 interaction. Mol. Cancer Res. 1, 1001–1008 (2003).
Tachibana, M. et al. Independence of the prognostic value of tumor suppressor protein expression in ovarian adenocarcinomas: A multivariate analysis of expression of p53, retinoblastoma, and related proteins. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 13, 598–606 (2003).
He, A. et al. A novel immunoassay for the quantization of CYFRA 21–1 in human serum. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 27, 277–283 (2013).
Mechaly, A., Cohen, N., Weiss, S. & Zahavy, E. A novel homogeneous immunoassay for anthrax detection based on the AlphaLISA method: detection of B. anthracis spores and protective antigen (PA) in complex samples. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 405, 3965–3972 (2013).
Tang, J. et al. Development of an up-conversion homogenous immunoassay for the determination of diethylstilbestrol in water. Anal. Lett. 48, 796–808 (2015).
Medda, X. et al. Development of a scalable, high-throughput-compatible assay to detect tau aggregates using iPSC-derived cortical neurons maintained in a three-dimensional culture format. J. Biomol. Screen. 21, 804–815 (2016).
Zhang, J. H., Chung, T. D. & Oldenburg, K. R. A simple statistical parameter for use in evaluation and validation of high throughput screening assays. J. Biomol. Screen. 4, 67–73 (1999).
Zuckerman, V. et al. c-Abl phosphorylates Hdmx and regulates its interaction with p53. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 4031–4039 (2009).
Bernal, F. et al. A stapled p53 helix overcomes HDMX-mediated suppression of p53. Cancer Cell 18, 411–422 (2010).
Wade, M. et al. Functional analysis and consequences of Mdm2 E3 ligase inhibition in human tumor cells. Oncogene 31, 4789–4797 (2012).
Glenn, K. J. et al. Investigating the effect of autoinduction in cynomolgus monkeys of a novel anticancer MDM2 antagonist, idasanutlin, and relevance to humans. Xenobiotica 46, 667–676 (2016).
Huang, Y. et al. Discovery of highly potent p53-MDM2 antagonists and structural basis for anti-acute myeloid leukemia activities. ACS Chem. Biol. 9, 802–811 (2014).
Lu, J. et al. Novel MDM2 inhibitor SAR405838 (MI-773) induces p53-mediated apoptosis in neuroblastoma. Oncotarget 7, 82757–82769 (2016).
Jeay, S. et al. A distinct p53 target gene set predicts for response to the selective p53-HDM2 inhibitor NVP-CGM097. eLife 4, e06498 (2015).
Williams, R. Discontinued in 2013: oncology drugs. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 24, 95–110 (2015).
Surget, S., Khoury, M. P. & Bourdon, J. C. Uncovering the role of p53 splice variants in human malignancy: a clinical perspective. OncoTargets Ther. 7, 57–68 (2013).
Shangary, S. & Wang, S. Small-molecule inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 protein-protein interaction to reactivate p53 function: a novel approach for cancer therapy. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 49, 223–241 (2009).
Wagner, T. et al. Identification of a small-molecule ligand of the epigenetic reader protein Spindlin1 via a versatile screening platform. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, e88 (2016).
Zhou, B. P. et al. HER-2/neu induces p53 ubiquitination via Akt-mediated MDM2 phosphorylation. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 973–982 (2001).
Chen, D. et al. Orf virus 002 protein targets ovine protein S100A4 and inhibits NF-κB signaling. Front. Microbiol. 7, 1389 (2016).
Acknowledgements
The work was financially supported by grants from the National High Technology Research and Development Program 863 (No. 2014AA020904) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21575058).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.X., Y.G., T.L., D.C., Y.W. and M.L. participated in design of the study. Y.X. and H.D. performed the experiments. Y.X., W.H., and S.L. wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Xiong, Y., Wu, Y., Luo, S. et al. Development of a novel immunoassay to detect interactions with the transactivation domain of p53: application to screening of new drugs. Sci Rep 7, 9185 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09574-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09574-7
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.