Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Gender Differences in Infant Mortality and Neonatal Morbidity in Mixed-Gender Twins


In the present study, we aimed to explore gender differences in infant mortality and neonatal morbidity in mixed-gender twin pairs. Data were obtained from the US National Center for Health Statistics Linked Birth-Infant Death Cohort. A total of 108,038 pairs of mixed-gender twins were included in this analysis. Among the mixed-gender twins, no significant difference in the odds of fetal mortality between male twins (1.05%) and female co-twins (1.04%). However, male twins were at increased odds of neonatal mortality (adjusted OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.37, 1.85) and overall infant mortality (adjusted OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.27, 1.61) relative to their female co-twins. Congenital abnormalities (adjusted OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.27, 1.50) were identified significantly more frequently in male than female twins. Moreover, increased odds of having low 5-minute Apgar score (<7) (adjusted OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.05, 1.26), assistant ventilation >30 minutes (adjusted OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.17, 1.47), and respiratory distress syndrome (adjusted OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.26, 1.66) were identified in male twins relative to their female counterparts. The results of our study indicated that in mixed-gender twin pairs, the odds of infant mortality and neonatal morbidity were higher in male twins than their female co-twins.


Over the past several decades, male subjects have been found to be at increased risk of mortality and morbidity relative to their female counterparts in not only the perinatal period but also throughout the entire lifespan1,2,3,4. Moreover, male gender has been found to be associated with increased risk of prematurity, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and intrauterine growth restriction3,4,5,6. However, some previous studies have reported the identification of lower rates of mortality in male than female infants due to disparities in the treatment of girls in some Asian countries7, 8. Most of these studies were conducted in singleton populations, the results of which may have been influenced by different intrauterine, household and social factors. In contrast, the genetic background, intrauterine and household environments of mixed-gender twin pairs are more similar than those of singleton pairs from different families. Comparing male twins and their female co-twins in mix-gender twin pairs can offer better opportunities to expose sex-related differences in infant mortality and neonatal morbidity.

Several studies have been conducted to explore the relationship between sex and prenatal outcomes in twin populations3,4,5. Most of these studies have compared male-male or female-female twin pairs3, 5. One study compared male twins and female co-twins, but only focused on the neonatal mortality and morbidity4. Research on the inter-sex differences in infant mortality and neonatal morbidity in mixed-gender twins remains limited. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the effect of sex on infant mortality and neonatal morbidity in a population of mixed-gender twins.


This study was based on data from the US National Center for Heath Statistic’s (NCHS) 1995–2004 matched multiple birth dataset9. The NCHS-matched multiple birth data contain information on maternal and pregnancy characteristics and perinatal and infant mortality for all multiple births that occurred from 1995–2004 in the United States. The twin data were abstracted from live birth and infant death certificates. The two babies composing twin pair were linked based on a 3-stage matching algorithm developed by the NCHS. The details of this algorithm have been described elsewhere10. This algorithm has been validated and found to be 99% accurate in linking 2 infants to a twin births10. Data on maternal demographic characteristics, obstetric history, current pregnancy, labor and delivery complications, and birth outcomes are available in these files. Since these data are publicly available in anonymized form, the study was exempted from ethical approval by the Institutional Review Board of Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.

The following obstetric and neonatal data were collected from the live birth certificates: maternal race, age, smoking status during pregnancy, education, marital status, pregnancy complications, labor complications and caesarean section status and the fetal sex, mode of delivery, gestational age, birth weight (grams), and morbidities, congenital anomalies, RDS, need for assistant ventilation >30 minutes and low 5-minute Apgar score (<7). In addition, fetal deaths occurring after 20 completed gestational weeks were registered as stillbirths, and neonatal and infant mortalities were defined as deaths occurring during the first 27 days and first 364 days of life, respectively.

In total 325,545 pairs of twins were included in the NCHS-matched multiple birth data. After excluding 217,505 pairs of same-gender twins, we examined gender differences in fetal mortality in 108,038 pairs of mixed-gender twins. Within the 213,816 live-born twins, the rates of congenital structural and chromosomal abnormalities were compared between male twins and female co-twins. Babies with severe structural and chromosomal abnormalities may have elevated risk of mortality and morbidity after birth; thus, for this analysis, we excluded 1241 newborns with encephalitis, spina bifida, meningocele, microcephalus, severe heart malformations and chromosomal abnormalities to further explore gender differences in infant mortality and neonatal morbidity. The definition of RDS included clinical evidence of respiratory difficulties (tachypnea, retraction, grunting and cyanosis) and radiographic appearance of RDS (low volume lungs with a diffuse reticulogranular pattern and air bronchograms)11. Because RDS was most frequently identified in preterm infants, we excluded term twins to evaluate the association between sex and RDS. (Fig. 1) Moreover, the results of a previous study indicated that the effect of race on prenatal health was predominantly moderated by social mechanisms12. To avoid the influence of race, we performed a stratified analysis to assess the effect of this variable.

Figure 1

Flow diagram. The U.S. National Center for Health Statistics Linked Birth-Infant Death Cohort, Detail Matched Multiple Birth datasets from 1995–2004.

Statistical analysis

The design of the present analysis was an inter-matched case-control study, the two inter-matched babies came from the same pregnancy. Most of the confounders were matched, except for birth weight, birth order and methods of delivery (the first baby was vaginal delivery, but the second one was cesarean section in partial twins). All outcomes were coded as dichotomous variables. Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square was used to assess the differences of the unmatched confounders. An univariate conditional logistic regression analysis was performed to calculate the crude odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the differences in outcomes between the male and female members of mix-gender twins. A multiple conditional logistic model was constructed to adjust for unmatched confounders. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All analyses were carried out using SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC).


Demographic and obstetrical characteristics

Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of the mothers of mixed-gender twins. Most of the twin’s mothers were white (78.0%), and the mean maternal age was 29.5 years. Approximately 84.4% mothers had at least a high school level of education. Maternal smoking was identified in 9.1% of the women. The majority of women underwent caesarean section (63.2%), while the rates of pregnancy and labor complications were 18.5% and 13.8%, respectively. Table 2 shows that the male twins have bigger birth size (2200 g ± 796 g vs 2094 g ± 778 g, P < 0.001) and more chance to delivery firstly than their female co-twins.

Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of the Mothers of Mixed-Gender Twins.
Table 2 The Unmatched Factors between the Male and the Female Co-twins in Mixed Gender Twins.

Perinatal outcomes

Among the 108,038 pairs of mixed-gender twins included in this study, the rate of fetal mortality was 1.05% (2260/216,076), and no difference was identified between male twins (1.05%) and female co-twins (1.04%) (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.91, 1.13). Among live-born twins, 3374 (1.58%) newborns had a congenital structure or chromosomal abnormality. The rate of congenital abnormalities (adjusted OR 1.38; 95% CI 1.27, 1.50) was higher in males than their female co-twins. The overall rate of infant mortality was 2.42% among mixed-gender twins without severe structural or chromosomal abnormalities. The odds of mortality were ignorantly greater among male twins than their female co-twins (adjusted OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.27, 1.61). Similar trends were identified for neonatal mortality (adjusted OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.37, 1.85) and infant mortality after 28 days (adjusted OR 1.18; 95% CI 1.00, 1.40). Moreover, the odds of low 5-minute Apgar score (<7) (adjusted OR 1.15; 95% CI 1.05, 1.26) and assistant ventilation >30 minutes (adjusted OR 1.31; 95% CI 1.17, 1.47) were significantly greater in males than females. After excluding term twins, 6019 (5.17%) of the total 116,531 premature newborns developed RDS, and male twins were also at greater odds of RDS than their female co-twins (adjusted OR 1.45; 95% CI 1.26, 1.66) (Table 3).

Table 3 Mortality and Morbidity in Mixed-Gender Twins: Comparison Between Male and Female Co-twins.

Subgroup Analyses

We further stratified the study subjects by race to explore the sex differences in infant mortality and perinatal morbidity within each race group. Similar results were identified in the white and black populations (Table 4).

Table 4 Race-stratified Analysis of Mortality and Morbidity in Male and Female Co-twins in Mixed-Gender Twin Pairs.


In this large population-based sample of mixed-gender twins, we demonstrated that male twins had significant greater odds of infant mortality and neonatal morbidity than their female co-twins. Our study included the largest population of mixed-gender twins evaluated thus far, and the results of our study contribute further evidences regarding gender-related differences in infant mortality and neonatal morbidity.

Mondal D et al. reviewed more than 30 million births worldwide in a meta-analysis and found that the risk of stillbirth was approximately 10% greater higher in males13. Our findings were in contrast with the results of this meta-analysis, as we did not identify a significant gender difference in the rate of fetal mortality. This difference may have been identified because Mondal D’s analysis included a population of singleton infants, which indicates that the presence of maternal conditions such as pregnancy obesity; low maternal socioeconomic status; and advanced maternal age might be associated with increased risk of stillbirth14. However, in our study population, male and female subjects had identical maternal environments. We speculated that our results may better indicate the influence of sex on the rate of fetal mortality. Moreover, our results were partially in accordance with those of the studies conducted by Steen EE et al. and Mullah ZD et al., both of which suggested the incidence of RDS, respiratory morbidity and neonatal mortality to be higher in male twins3, 5.

Explanations for the excess mortality and morbidity observed in males have been proposed in many singleton studies, and theorized to represent a “male disadvantage”4, 15, 16, suggesting that male sex seemed to be more vulnerable to mortality and morbidity, including low Apgar score, intrauterine growth restriction, respiratory insufficiency or prematurity4, 6, 17, 18. The underlying mechanisms contributing to the observed male disadvantage have not been elucidated. At present, some hypotheses have been proposed regarding the role of gender-associated genetic and endocrine differences in the determination of neonatal mortality or morbidity.

Authors of previous studies have speculated that the male disadvantage might be caused by hormonal environment differences. Male fetuses have been reported to have a higher level of circulating testosterone than female fetuses19. This difference might be associated with differences in pulmonary biomechanics and vascular development that lead to increased respiratory and neurological morbidity among preterm male neonates20. Currently, pulmonary disease and its complications remain predominant causes of early death21. The results of a study conducted by Shinwell et al. showed that the rates of RDS and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were significantly higher in male-male twins because of the inhibitory effects of androgens on lung development21. On the other hand, Mc Curnin DC et al.22 found that estrogen might be play an important role in pulmonary function and caused a persistent decrease in ventilatory support requirements in their animal study, which could explain the lower rate of assistant ventilation identified among female infants in our study. Moreover, other studies have reported that preterm females had significantly higher catecholamine levels than preterm males, which has been identified as an important defense mechanism utilized by the hypoxic fetus23, 24. In another animal study, Ishak N et al.25 found that male fetuses tended to have significantly lower pH levels and higher arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2), lactate levels, glucose levels, and mean arterial pressures than females one hour after delivery, which may be associated with increased mortality in males. Moreover, the authors found that preterm male lambs had lower lung compliance than their female counterparts, which may have been identified due to altered surfactant phospholipid composition and function. These changes may compromise gas exchange and impair respiratory adaptation after preterm birth among males.

Authors have also hypothesized that the higher rate of mortality observed among male fetuses may be linked to differences in sex chromosomes. The Y chromosome contains only 50 genes, including the MSY gene, whereas the X chromosome contains roughly 3000 genes26. The Y chromosome is highly repetitive and mostly non-functional. Therefore, authors have suggested persons with XY chromosomes may be more susceptible to X-linked recessive disorders than persons with XX chromosomes; thus, male children may be less likely to be healthy than their female counterparts27. In our study, we found that male twins had higher rates of congenital abnormalities than their female co-twins, which might have been identified due to this chromosomal difference. Furthermore, congenital anomalies have been identified as causative factors contributing to the fetal and neonatal mortality28. Therefore, the risk of neonatal and infant mortality may be higher among male than female twins.

In summary, the current study demonstrated that the odds of neonatal mortality and other perinatal outcomes were higher among male twins than their female co-twins in mixed-gender pairs. Although this finding is partly in agreement with those of previous reports, a major strength of this study was the homogeneity of the study population. In this study, we focused on a cohort of mixed-gender twins, thus eliminating, to a large degree, the potentially confounding effects of iatrogenic, genetic, and/or social factors. Our data contribute to the body of evidence regarding the role of fetal sex as an important risk factor for infant mortality and neonatal morbidity in mixed-gender twins.


  1. 1.

    Melamed, N., Yogev, Y. & Glezerman, M. Effect of fetal sex on pregnancy outcome in twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 114, 1085–1092 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Speakman, J. R. Sex- and age-related mortality profiles during famine: testing the ‘body fat’ hypothesis. J Biosoc Sci. 45, 823–840 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Steen, E. E., Källén, K., Maršál, K., Norman, M. & Hellström-Westas, L. Impact of sex on perinatal mortality and morbidity in twins. J Perinat Med. 42, 225–231 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Stevenson, D. K. et al. Sex differences in outcomes of very low birthweight infants: the newborn male disadvantage. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 83, F182–185 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mulla, Z. D., Plavsic, S. K., Ortiz, M., Nuwayhid, B. S. & Ananth, C. V. Fetal sex pairing and adverse perinatal outcomes in twin gestations. Ann Epidemiol. 23, 7–12 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Peelen, M. J. et al. Impact of fetal gender on the risk of preterm birth, a national cohort study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 95, 1112–1120 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Alkema, L. et al. National, regional, and global sex ratios of infant, child, and under-5 mortality and identification of countries with outlying ratios: a systematic assessment. Lancet Global Health. 9, e521 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    The Million Death Study Collaborators. Causes of neonatal and child mortality in India: a nationally representative mortality survey. Lancet. 376, 1853–1860 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Birth cohort linked matched multiplebirth dataset, 1995–2000. (2004).

  10. 10.

    Martin, J., Curtin, S., Saulnier, M. & Mousavi, J. Development of the Matched Multiple Birth File. In: 1995–1997 Matched multiple birth dataset. NCHS CD-ROM series 21, no. 12. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville (1998).

  11. 11.

    X, K. et al. Neonatal mortality and morbidity among infants between 24 to 31 complete weeks: a multicenter survey in China from 2013 to 2014. Bmc Pediatrics. 16, 174 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    El-Sayed, A. M., Paczkowski, M., Rutherford, C. G., Keyes, K. M. & Galea, S. Social Environments, Genetics, and Black-White Disparities in Infant Mortality. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 29, 546–551 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mondal, D., Galloway, T. S., Bailey, T. C. & Mathews, F. Elevated risk of stillbirth in males: systematic review and meta-analysis of more than 30 million births. BMC medicine. 12, 220 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Flenady, V. et al. Major risk factors for stillbirth in high-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 377, 1331–1340 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Roy, P., Kumar, A., Kaur, I. R. & Faridi, M. M. Gender differences in outcomes of low birth weight and preterm neonates: the male disadvantage. J Trop Pediatr. 60, 480–481 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Simchen, M. J. et al. Male disadvantage for neonatal complications of term infants, especially in small-for-gestational age neonates. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 27, 839–843 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Aibar, L., Puertas, A., Valverde, M., Carrillo, M. P. & Montoya, F. Fetal sex and perinatal outcomes. J Perinat Med. 40, 271–276 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Hou, L. et al. Cross sectional study in China: fetal gender has adverse perinatal outcomes in mainland China. BMC pregnancy childbirth. 14, 372 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Whitehouse, A. J. et al. Sex-specific associations between umbilical cord blood testosterone levels and language delay in early childhood. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 53, 726–734 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cho, J. & Holditch-Davis, D. Effects of perinatal testosterone on infant health, mother-infant interactions, and infant development. Biol Res Nurs. 16, 228–236 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Shinwell, E. S., Reichman, B., Lerner-Geva, L., Boyko, V. & Blickstein, I. “Masculinizing” effect on respiratory morbidity in girls from unlike-sex preterm twins: a possible transchorionic paracrine effect. Pediatrics. 120, e447–453 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    McCurnin, D. C. et al. Postnatal estradiol up-regulates lung nitric oxide synthases and improves lung function in bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 179, 492–500 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Greenough, A., Lagercrantz, H., Pool, J. & Dahlin, I. Plasma catecholamine levels in preterm infants. Effect of birth asphyxia and Apgar score. Acta Paediatr Scand. 76, 54–59 (1987).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Ingemarsson, I. Gender aspects of preterm birth. BJOG. 110(Suppl 20), 34–38 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ishak, N. et al. Sex differences in cardiorespiratory transition and surfactant composition following preterm birth in sheep. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 303, R778–789 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Di Renzo, G. C., Rosati, A., Sarti, R. D., Cruciani, L. & Cutuli, A. M. Does fetal sex affect pregnancy outcome? Gend Med. 4, 19–30 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Pongou, R. Why is infant mortality higher in boys than in girls? A new hypothesis based on preconception environment and evidence from a large sample of twins. Demography. 50, 421–444 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Flenady, V. et al. Stillbirths: the way forward in high-income countries. Lancet. 377, 1703–1717 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 81270729 to Y.Z., NSFC 81401280 to X.L.], and the Early Life Plan.

Author information




Y.Z. conceived and designed the study. X.L. and L.Z. undertook the analysis and interpretation of the data. D.Z drafted the initial manuscript. Y.Z. and X.L. was responsible for overall integrity, progress and timely completion all authors participated in the editing of the manuscript and approved the final version for publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xiaoping Lei or Yongjun Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, D., Zou, L., Lei, X. et al. Gender Differences in Infant Mortality and Neonatal Morbidity in Mixed-Gender Twins. Sci Rep 7, 8736 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing