Integrin β3/Akt signaling contributes to platelet-induced hemangioendothelioma growth

Article metrics

Abstract

Hemangioendothelioma (HE) is a type of angiomatous lesions that features endothelial cell proliferation. Understanding the mechanisms orchestrating HE angiogenesis can provide therapeutic insights. It has been shown that platelets can support normal and malignant endothelial cells during angiogenesis. Using the mouse endothelial-derived EOMA cell line as a model of HE, we explored the regulatory effect of platelets. We found that platelets stimulated EOMA proliferation but did not mitigate apoptosis. Furthermore, direct platelet-EOMA cell contact was required and the proliferation was mediated via integrin β3/Akt signaling in EOMA cells. SiRNA knockdown of integrin β3 and inhibition of Akt activity significantly abolished platelet-induced EOMA cell proliferation in vitro and tumor development in vivo. These results provide a new mechanism by which platelets support HE progression and suggest integrin β3 as a potential target to treat HE.

Introduction

Vascular neoplasms are tumors arising from blood vessel endothelial cells. Hemangioendothelioma (HE) defines vascular neoplasms that are characteristically between benign hemangiomas and malignant angiosarcomas1. HE comprises several clinical manifestations and histological hallmarks including papillary intralymphatic angioendothelioma, retiform HE, kaposiform HE, epithelioid HE, pseudomyogenic HE, and composite HE2. One specific form, Kaposiform HE, is frequently associated with Kasabach–Merritt syndrome (KMS), which features coagulopathy due to thrombocytopenia in infants3. To investigate the therapeutic targets of HE, the EOMA endothelial cell line, derived from a mixed HE arising in an adult mouse, was developed as a model of HE4. The EOMA cell line closely mimics the HE condition, responding to angiogenic regulators5, 6, inducing vessel formation, and promoting development of KMS in mice7. Therefore, a number of studies have utilized this cell line in order to examine the therapeutic potential of a variety of factors8,9,10,11. Moreover, examination of endogenous factors expressed by EOMA cells that increase angiogenesis such as insulin-like growth factor 2, 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1, transcription factor Prox1, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, has also provided important clues to HE progression12,13,14,15,16. However, to date, there is limited information on the in vivo microenvironment of HE and how it can modulate HE progression. Consequently, we sought to determine how microenvironmental factors influence HE development.

Platelets are one of the principal blood-borne contributors of angiogenesis. They are anucleate fragments of megakaryocyte cytoplasm which play essential roles in homeostasis and thrombosis under physiological and pathophysiological conditions17, 18. Recently, a great deal of information has been determined regarding the mechanisms underlying platelet-induced angiogenesis. Activated platelets released several trophic factors from specialized intracellular granules, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) and platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor (PDGF), to support the survival and growth of endothelial cells19,20,21. Tumor cells can induce the activation of platelets, resulting in the promotion of tumor angiogenesis and the facilitation of cancer progression22, 23. Additionally, integrin β3, an abundant glycoprotein on the platelet plasma membrane, plays an important role in hypoxia-induced retinal angiogenesis and fetal angiogenesis, suggesting direct platelet-endothelium contact can mediate endothelial cell proliferation24, 25. Of note, integrin β3 is also highly expressed on endothelial cells and tumor cells contributing to several important cellular functions, for instance, migration, adhesion, angiogenesis and tumor growth26, 27. Alternatively, the internalization of platelets by endothelial cells may serve as another source of pro-angiogenic and anti-apoptotic effects28.

In the present study we utilized the EOMA cell line, a well-recognized cell model of HE, to investigate the influence of platelets on HE development. The proliferation and apoptosis of EOMA cells upon platelet treatment were examined. Furthermore, several of the aforementioned mechanisms driving platelet-induced angiogenesis were explored. This study illustrates the importance of platelets upon HE progression and suggests potential avenues for the therapeutic treatment of HE development.

Results

Platelets enhanced EOMA cell survival

To investigate their effect on HE, platelets were isolated from mouse blood and incubated with EOMA cells, a well-established cellular model of murine HE. We also employed mouse brain microvascular endothelial cells (MBMECs) from C57BL/6 J mice as a control to reveal tumor cell-specific activity in response to platelets. To exclude the influence of serum-derived factors, the viability of EOMA cells and MBMECs was examined using the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8) assay with different FBS concentrations. We determined that 0.5% FBS supported modest and comparable growth in both EOMA cells and MBMECs (Fig. 1a). We therefore used this culture condition in subsequent studies. As shown in Fig. 1b, co-culture of EOMA cells with platelets for 72 hours significantly enhanced EOMA cell number approximately 125% of control, whereas MBMEC survival was not affected. This suggests that platelets affected EOMA cells specifically.

Figure 1
figure1

Platelet treatment increased the survival of EOMA cells without affecting cell apoptosis. (a) Effect of serum concentrations on the survival of EOMA cells and MBMECs. EOMA cells and MBMECs were cultured in medium with indicated concentrations of FBS for 72 hours. The cell viability was then assessed using the CCK8 assay. Representative images show the morphology of EOMA cells and MBMECs cultured with 0 and 0.5% serum for 72 hours. Scale bar, 50 μm. n = 5, one-way ANOVA. (b) Representative images and the cell viability of EOMA cell and MBMECs after platelet treatment for 72 hours. Scale bar, 75 μm. (c,d) Both EOMA cells and MBMECs were treated with platelets for (c) 24 hours and (d) 48 hours, stained with Annexin V/PI, and then evaluated via flow cytometry. (e) The 48-hour treatment of platelets did not affect apoptotic proportions of EOMA cells. n = 3, t-test. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

Platelets did not affect EOMA cell apoptosis

We next wanted to determine if platelets increased cell number by inhibiting apoptosis. Using the well-established Annexin V/PI assay, we evaluated the apoptosis of EOMA cells and MBMECs co-cultured with platelets. After treatment with platelets for 24 or 48 hours, apoptosis was examined using flow cytometry (Fig. 1c,d). We determined that there was no significant change in either cell type of living, early apoptotic, and late apoptotic cell populations in response to platelets (Fig. 1e), suggesting that platelets do not increase EOMA cell resistance to apoptosis.

Platelets stimulated EOMA cell proliferation

Since apoptosis did not seem to be affected by platelet treatment, we asked if the apparent increase in cell survival reflects the up-regulation of proliferation. Thus, we performed 5-ethynyl-20-deoxyuridine (EdU) assays to quantify DNA synthesis, a hallmark of cell proliferation, in platelet treated EOMA cells. Treatment of platelets for both 24 and 48 hours significantly increased EdU incorporation into EOMA cell nuclei by approximately 150% and 200% of control, respectively (Fig. 2a). However, platelets did not induce significant EdU incorporation in MBMECs (Fig. 2b), which is in accordance with MBMEC survival results. We also examined if platelets could affect EOMA cells using non-contact co-culture. We found that platelets failed to increase EOMA cell viability in this situation (Fig. 2c). This result indicates that platelets may induce EOMAa cell proliferation in a cell contact-dependent manner. Consequently, our data demonstrates that platelets promote the proliferation of EOMA cells.

Figure 2
figure2

Platelet treatment induced EOMA cell proliferation. (a) EOMA cells and (b) MBMECs were incubated with platelets for either 24 or 48 hours. EdU (yellow) and DAPI (blue) staining was used to examine the cell proliferation. Scale bar, 60 μm. n = 5, t-test. (c) EOMA cells were incubated with platelets in a non-contact co-culture for 72 hours. The cell viability was examined by CCK8 assay. n = 4, one-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

EOMA cells did not induce pro-angiogenic activation of platelets

There is accumulating evidence indicating that platelets are activated to release pro-angiogenic factors in response to neighbor cells, including tumor cells23, 29,30,31. This may account for the observed platelet-induced increases in EOMA cell proliferation. To investigate this possibility, we analyzed the surface expression of CD62P (P-selectin), a marker of platelet activation, on platelets co-cultured with EOMA cells or incubated in EOMA conditioned medium (CM). As depicted in Fig. 3a, the surface level of CD62P, which was negligible on untreated platelets, was readily increased by thrombin, a commonly used platelet activator. However, no significant elevation of surface CD62P level was found on platelets in response to 24-hour platelet-EOMA co-culture or EOMA CM treatment (Fig. 3a). This suggests that EOMA cells may not be able to activate platelets. Next we investigated the release of angiogenic factors from platelets in response to EOMA cells. Except for pro-angiogenic factor angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) and anti-angiogenic factor platelet factor 4 (PF4), we observed no obvious increase in angiogenic factor release (Fig. 3b). Of the two identified factors, Ang-1, and its receptor Tie-2, have been strongly linked to the process of angiogenesis32. Consequently, we further examined if Ang-1 had a role in EOMA cell promotion. We blocked the Tie-2 receptor activity on EOMA cells via neutralizing antibodies, and then treated these cells with platelets. However, blockage of the Tie-2 receptor failed to prevent platelet-induced EOMA cell survival (Fig. 3c). This suggests that EOMA cells do not stimulate pro-angiogenic activation of platelets and that Ang-1/Tie-2 signaling is not involved in platelet-induced EOMA growth.

Figure 3
figure3

EOMA-platelet co-culture did not stimulate pro-angiogenic activation of platelets. (a) Platelets were co-cultured with either EOMA cells or MBMECs, or incubated in conditioned medium (CM) from either EOMA cells or MBMECs for 24 hours. Activation of platelets was then assessed by measuring the surface level of CD62P via flow cytometry. Thrombin was used as a positive control. (b) EOMA cells and MBMECs were cultured alone or with platelets for 24 hours. The levels of angiogenic factors in the culture medium were examined using the mouse angiogenesis antibody array. (c) EOMA cells were pre-treated with anti-Tie-2 antibody for 30 minutes and then incubated with platelets for another 72 hours. The cell viability was examined by CCK8 assay. n = 4, two-way ANOVA. ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

EOMA cells only had a limited capacity for platelet uptake

It has been shown that endothelial cells are semi-professional phagocytes and possess the capacity to internalize platelets, stimulating angiogenesis28. However, the extent to which EOMA cells can internalize platelets and the subsequent effect on tumor angiogenesis are unclear. As such, we treated EOMA cells and MBMECs with carboxyfluorescein diacetate succinimidyl ester (CFSE)-labeled platelets (Fig. 4a) and evaluated the quantity of engulfed platelets. We found that EOMA cells, as well as normal MBMECs, were able to phagocytose platelets in a limited fashion (Fig. 4b). Nevertheless, flow cytometry analysis revealed that the increase of CFSE fluorescence in EOMA cells was undetectable after 20-hour platelet treatment (Fig. 4c), suggesting that EOMA cells do not robustly uptake platelets. Therefore, we speculate that the internalization of platelets is also not a driving force of EOMA cell proliferation.

Figure 4
figure4

EOMA cells had a limited ability to internalize platelets. (a) Flow cytometric data showing the efficient CFSE labeling in platelets. (b) EOMA cells and MBMECs were incubated with CFSE+ platelets (green) for 5, 20, or 48 hours, and the engulfment of platelets by cells was detected by the localization of CFSE+ platelets within CD31+ cells (red). Scale bar, 10 μm. (c) EOMA cells and MBMECs were incubated with CFSE+ platelets for 20 hours and the amounts of internalized platelets were measured by flow cytometry. n = 3, t-test. *P < 0.05; ns, not significant.

Integrin β3/Akt signaling was involved in platelet-induced EOMA cell proliferation

Next, we tested whether platelets can influence HE progression via activation of surface receptors on EOMA cells. It has been reported that integrins, abundantly expressed on the surface of endothelial cells, could contribute to contact-associated cell growth33. Following platelet treatment, the total protein levels of integrin β3, but not integrin β4, were significantly increased in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 5a). Interestingly, the up-regulation of total integrin β3 protein was not associated with increased integrin β3 mRNA expression (Fig. 5b), nor was it related to changes in surface expression of integrin β3 (Fig. 5c). Further analysis revealed that integrin β3 levels were only increased in the cytoplasmic fraction of EOMA cells (Fig. 5c), indicating that platelet treatment affects post-transcriptional regulation of integrin β334.

Figure 5
figure5

Integrin β3 was associated to platelet-induced Akt phosphorylation in EOMA cells. EOMA cells were treated with platelets for indicated times and (a) the total protein levels of integrin β3 and integrin β4, (b) RNA level of integrin β3, and (c) protein levels of integrin β3 in membrane and cytoplasmic fractions were examined by either Western blot or real-time PCR. Na/K ATPase and β-actin were used as loading controls. (d) EOMA cells were treated with platelets for specified times and the levels of ILK, phospho-PI3K, PI3K, phospho-Akt, Akt, phospho-p65, p65, and IκBα were assessed by Western blot. (e) EOMA cells were subject to siRNA transfections for 4 days and the level of integrin β3 at indicated times was examined by Western blot. (f) EOMA cells were transfected with control or integrin β3 siRNA for 4 days, and then treated with platelets for 30 minutes. The phosphorylation of Akt was assessed by Western blot. (g) EOMA cells were treated with or without platelets for 30 minutes then subject to immunoprecipitation using an Akt specific antibody. The interaction of integrin β3 with Akt was then assessed via Western blot. (h) EOMA cells were pre-treated with 10 μM QLT0267, and then incubated with platelets for 30 minutes. The phosphorylation of Akt was assessed by Western blot. n = 3–6, t-test, one-way or two-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

We also observed significant phosphorylation of Akt in EOMA cells following short-term treatment of platelets (Fig. 5d), supporting the idea of contact-mediated EOMA proliferation. The PI3K/Akt/NF-κB pathway is a well-defined avenue through which the proliferation of endothelial cells is regulated35,36,37. However, the ratio of phosphorylated PI3K and NF-κB, was not significantly altered after platelet treatment (Fig. 5d), indicating that other unknown factors are participating in platelet-elicited Akt activation. To explore any possible association between integrin β3 and observed Akt phosphorylation, we performed siRNA-mediated knockdown of integrin β3 in EOMA cells, which effectively inhibited integrin β3 expression for up to 7 days (Fig. 5e). We observed that integrin β3 knockdown abolished Akt phosphorylation after platelet treatment (Fig. 5f). Immunoprecipitation assays also demonstrated that direct interaction between integrin β3 and Akt in platelet treated and untreated EOMA cells (Fig. 5g). To further investigate this connection we examined integrin-linked kinase (ILK), an important effector downstream of integrins. This kinase plays indispensable roles in multiple cellular functions including cell proliferation, migration, adhesions and signal transduction. Pre-treatment with the ILK-specific inhibitor, QLT0267, also prevented platelet-induced Akt phosphorylation (Fig. 5h). These results indicate the involvement of integrin β3/ILK signaling in platelet-associated Akt activation in EOMA cells.

Subsequently, we found that knockdown of integrin β3 inhibited platelet-induced EOMA cell proliferation (Fig. 6a). Using GSK690693, a potent Akt inhibitor which did not affect EOMA cell viability (Fig. 6b), we were able to suppress platelet-induced increases in EOMA cell proliferation (Fig. 6c). EdU assays confirmed that both the knockdown of integrin β3 and pharmaceutical inhibition of Akt activity abolished platelet-elicited EOMA cell proliferation (Fig. 6d). Taken together our results strongly suggest that direct platelet-EOMA cell contact and the activation of integrin β3/Akt signaling mediates platelet-associated proliferation of EOMA cells.

Figure 6
figure6

The integrin β3/Akt signaling contributed to platelet-induced EOMA cell proliferation. (a) EOMA cells were transfected with control or integrin β3 siRNA for 4 days, and then treated with platelets for another 72 hours. The cell viability was examined using the CCK8 assay. (b) The EOMA cells were incubated with indicated concentrations of Akt inhibitor GSK690693 for 72 hours. GSK690693 treatments with 1 and 2 μM did not significantly affect EOMA cell survival. (c) EOMA cells were pre-treated with Akt inhibitor GSK690693 for 3 hours, and then incubated with platelets for another 72 hours. The cell viability was examined using the CCK8 assay. (d) EOMA cells were either transfected with control or integrin β3 siRNA for 4 days, or pre-treated with GSK690693 for 3 hours, and then incubated with platelets for another 48 hours. The cell proliferation was assessed via the EdU assay. Scale bar, 60 μm. n = 3–5, one-way or two-way ANOVA. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001; ns, not significant.

Inhibition of integrin β3 expression and Akt activation attenuated HE growth in vivo

Finally we determined if our in vitro results could be replicated in vivo. EOMA cells pre-treated with integrin β3 siRNA were administered to C57BL/6 J mice via subcutaneous injection and evaluated for HE development 7 days post-injection (Fig. 7a). Compared to the control, EOMA cells whose integrin β3 expression was inhibited developed smaller tumor masses, identified by reduced tumor volumes and tumor weights (Fig. 7b,c). Furthermore, subcutaneous injection of EOMA cells with GSK690693 (Fig. 7d) also resulted in smaller HE masses compared to the vehicle control (Fig. 7e,f). This suggests that both integrin β3 expression and Akt activity are critical determinants in platelet-regulated HE progression and are potential therapeutic targets.

Figure 7
figure7

Knockdown of integrin β3 expression and inhibition of Akt activation attenuated HE growth in vivo. (a) EOMA cells were first transfected with control or integrin β3 siRNA for 4 days, then injected into C57BL/6 J mice on day 0. The tumors were collected on day 7. (b) Representative images showing subcutaneous growth of HE in response to the knockdown of integrin β3. Scale bar, 1 cm. Arrows indicated subcutaneous HE. (c) The tumor volumes and weights in response to the knockdown of integrin β3. (d) C57BL/6 J mice were injected with EOMA cells in the presence of GSK690693 or vehicle on day 0, then subjected to an additional intratumoral injection of GSK690693 or vehicle on day 3. Animals were sacrificed and the tumor tissues were harvested on day 7. (e) Representative images showing subcutaneous HE in response to Akt inhibition. Scale bar, 1 cm. Arrows indicated subcutaneous HE. (f) The tumor volumes and weights in response to Akt inhibition. n = 4, t-test. *P < 0.05.

Discussion

While some investigations have shown that platelets elicited pro-apoptotic effects upon endothelial cells under specific pathological conditions38, 39, others showed that platelets could trigger multiple anti-apoptotic mechanisms, including the activation of Akt. Furthermore, literature shows that platelets can stimulate angiogenesis through various proliferative pathways such as VEGF, PDGF and bFGF signalings40, 41. In terms of tumorigenicity, platelets can promote the growth of various tumors, including bone, colorectal, and ovarian cancers22, 42,43,44. In the present study we observed that platelets have a proliferative, rather than pro-apoptotic impact on EOMA cells. However the effect of platelets may be influenced by numerous mediating mechanisms including, platelet-derived adhesion molecules (e.g., CD62P), platelet-released angiogenic factors (e.g., VEGF, PDGF), tumor cell membrane receptors (e.g., VEGF receptor, PDGF receptor, transforming growth factor-β receptor), and intracellular signaling molecules (e.g., Akt)22, 42,43,44. For example, platelets were found to inhibit the growth of murine lymphoma and prostate cancer cells45. Thus, the responses of tumor cells to platelets may cancer type specific.

Several studies have shown that tumors can activate platelets via promotion of aggregation and thrombosis46,47,48,49. Upon activation, platelets undergo de-granulation, releasing vast amounts of protein modulating important biological functions such as, thrombosis, angiogenesis, and would healing29,30,31. Wu et al. reported that lung cancer cells could induce platelets to release several pro-angiogenic factors, including IL-1α, GM-CSF, MMP-1 and VEGF, resulting in enhanced endothelial cell migration and capillary tube formation23. However, when we evaluated CD62P surface levels we did not observe significant activation by EOMA cells. Similarly, antibody array analysis revealed almost no up-regulation of pro-angiogenic protein release from platelets following tumor cell conditioning. Our data suggest that platelet activation and subsequent release of pro-angiogenic factors do not contribute to EOMA cell proliferation. We speculate that HE may have an inferior ability to activate platelets when compared to other types of tumors cells.

Endothelial cells possess a strong phagocytotic capacity for a variety of particulates, including aged and apoptotic cells50. Platelets and platelet-derived particles can also be effectively uptaken by endothelial cells51, 52, prolonging the survival of endothelial cells28. While we observed mild uptake by MBMECs, we observed for the first time that platelets are poorly internalized by EOMA cells, suggesting that tumor-derived endothelial cells exhibit impaired phagocytosis of platelets. This could be due to reductions in receptor-mediated recognition of platelets, or disrupted formation of phagocytotic vesicles. Further investigation is needed to determine why EOMA cells have a reduced capacity for platelet internalization.

Integrins are highly important to cell-cell contact53, 54, which can contribute to platelet-induced endothelial and tumor cell growth55, 56. Integrin β3 is abundantly expressed on endothelial cells and exerts essential effects on endothelial migration, adhesion, angiogenesis27, and importantly tumor growth26. For example, Integrin β3 plays a supportive role in melanoma survival in vivo and is a critical therapeutic target for the treatment of human melanoma-bearing animals26. Blockage of integrin β3 signaling can result in impaired angiogenesis and is anti-tumorigenic24, 57. The application of anti-integrin β3 antisera also helps ameliorate fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia-associated intracranial hemorrhage24. In line with the previously mentioned studies, we found that integrin β3 was involved in platelet-induced Akt phosphorylation and EOMA cell proliferation. However, the means by which integrin β3 activity on EOMA cells was regulated by platelets is still unclear. Platelets caused no change of the membrane proportion of integrin β3, suggesting the membrane trafficking of integrinβ3 was not influenced by platelets. Since platelets did not affect the transcription of Itgb3 gene, the increased distribution of cytoplasmic integrin β3 by platelets could result from up-regulated mRNA translation or reduced protein degradation. More research is needed to illustrate such post-transcriptional regulations.

While platelet-induced EOMA cell proliferation was integrin β3- and Akt phosphorylation-dependent, inactivation of integrin β3 or Akt itself did not affect cell survival in vitro. The reason could be explained by the in vitro culture condition we applied, in which low concentration of serum may minimize basal cell growth along with minimal integrin β3 and Akt activation. When it comes to the in vivo situation, Akt is commonly hyperactivated in tumor cells, thus inactivation of Akt is of interest as a cancer treatment strategy58. Since the in vivo anti-tumor efficacy of Akt inhibitor GSK690693 has been shown in mice bearing breast tumor, lymphoma, endometrial tumor, ovarian carcinoma, and osteosarcoma59, 60, we also examined the role of GSK690693 in the treatment of HE in animals. As anticipated, GSK690693 significantly suppressed HE development in vivo, which supports a functional link between integrin β3, Akt activation, and HE progression. In summary, we demonstrate that platelets induce EOMA cell proliferation via cell-cell contact-based activation of integrin β3/Akt signaling. Furthermore, employing an in vivo HE model, our data indicate that the reductions of integrin β3 level and Akt activity mitigate HE progression, offering novel avenues for HE treatment.

Materials and Methods

Animals, cell lines, and reagents

Female C57BL/6 J mice (7–8 weeks of age) were purchased from the Jinan University Laboratory Animal Center. All outlined in vivo procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Jinan University. EOMA cells (CRL-2586), were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and maintained in full medium (DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics) (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) at 37 °C, 5% CO2. MBMECs were prepared as previously described61 and cultured in full medium. All reagents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, MO) unless otherwise indicated. QLT0267 was purchased from QLT, Inc. (Vancouver, Canada). The primary antibodies used were: rabbit-anti-IκBα (sc-371) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Dallas, TX); FITC-conjugated rat-anti-CD62P (#561923) and FITC-conjugated rat IgG1 isotype control (#553995) from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA); rabbit-anti-integrin β3 (#13166), rabbit-anti-integrin β4 (#14803), rabbit-anti-β-actin (#12620), rabbit-anti-ILK (#3856), rabbit-anti-PI3K p85 (#4257), rabbit-anti-phospho-PI3K p85 (#4228), rabbit-anti-NF-κB p65 (#8242), rabbit-anti-phospho-NF-κB p65 (#3033), rabbit-anti-Akt (#4691), rabbit-anti-phospho-Akt (#4060) and normal rabbit IgG (#2729) from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA); rat-anti-CD31 (ab7388) and rabbit-anti-Na/K ATPase (ab76020) from Abcam (Cambridge, MA); goat-anti-Tie-2 (AF762-SP) and goat IgG isotype control (AB-108-C) from R&D systems (Minneapolis, MN).

Platelet isolation

Mice were anesthetized with 4% trichloroacetaldehyde hydrate and the blood was collected via the orbital sinus. Nine volumes of fresh blood were mixed with 1 volume of anticoagulant citrate dextrose solution, then further mixed 1:1 with Tyrode’s solution. The mixture was centrifuged twice at 150 × g for 8 minutes, then the platelet-rich plasma collected from the supernatant was passed over a Sepharose 2B gel filtration column. The plasma-free platelets were eluted in Hepes-buffered modified Tyrode’s (HBMT) buffer and centrifuged at 650 × g for 8 minutes. Resulting pellets were resuspended in DMEM containing 0.5% FBS. Platelets were used at a final concentration of 5 × 106 per mL.

Cell viability assay

Cells were seeded into 96-well plates at a density of 1000 cells per well in full medium for 24 hours. The culture medium was then replaced with DMEM containing 0.5% FBS for 72 hours in the presence of platelets. Additional wells did not receive platelet treatment and served as a control. The cell viability was determined using the CCK8 assay (Dojindo molecular Technologies, Rockville, MD) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

EdU proliferation assay

Cells were seeded onto cover slips in 24-well plates at a density of 5000 cells per well in full medium for 24 hours, then cultured in DMEM with 0.5% FBS in the presence or absence of platelets for specified times. Cells grown in DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS were used as a positive control. After treatment, cells were exposed to 50 μM EdU (Ribobio, Guangzhou, China) for 5 hours, followed by fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Cells were then washed with PBS, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes, and incubated with 300 μL of Apollo reaction cocktail for 30 minutes. Nuclei with yellow fluorescence were EdU-positive indicating proliferating cells. Total nuclei counts were determined via 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) staining with blue fluorescence. The proliferation was stated as the ratio of EdU/DAPI double positive nuclei divided by total DAPI-positive nuclei.

Annexin V-propidium iodide (PI) apoptosis assay

Cells were plated in 60-mm dishes containing full medium for 24 hours, and then treated with platelets in DMEM supplemented with 0.5% FBS for another 24 or 48 hours. Cells undergoing apoptosis were detected using the Annexin V-FITC apoptosis kit (BioVision, Milpitas, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and analyzed using the FACS-Aria cytometer (BD Biosciences).

Non-contact co-culture

EOMA cells were plated in 24-well plates containing full medium for 24 hours, and then incubated in DMEM containing 0.5% FBS with the inserts of Transwell chamber (0.4 µm pore size, Sigma) for another 72 hours. Platelets were placed in 100 µL of DMEM containing 0.5% FBS into the inserts. Cells grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS were used as a positive control. Following co-culture, the cell viability was determined using the CCK8 assay.

Platelet internalization assay

Platelets were labeled with CFSE, a cell-permeable fluorescent dye for 30 minutes, and then co-cultured with either EOMA cells or MBMECs for specified times. Un-ingested platelets were washed away with PBS. Internalized platelets were assessed via the detection of intracellular CSFE fluorescence using immunofluorescent staining and flow cytometry.

Immunofluorescent staining

Cells were washed with PBS, fixed with 4% PFA and permeabilized with PBS containing 0.3% BSA and 0.1% Tween 20. Cells were incubated with primary and corresponding secondary antibodies at 4 °C (overnight) and room temperature (90 minutes), respectively. Image acquisition was performed using the Zeiss LSM700 confocal scanning microscope and the ZEN software (Carl Zeiss, Goettingen, Germany).

Platelet activation assay

The platelets were treated as indicated, and the surface expression of CD62P, a marker of platelet activation, was probed by the FITC-conjugated primary antibody and analyzed using the FACS-Aria cytometer. The corresponding isotype control antibody was used as a negative control.

Murine angiogenesis protein analysis

Culture media from EOMA cells and MBMECs, alone or co-cultured with platelets for 24 hours, were collected and centrifuged. The supernatants were used to detect the levels of released angiogenic factors using the Proteome Profiler Mouse Angiogenesis Array Kit (ARY015, R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Integrin β3 knockdown

Cells seeded into 6-well plate were transfected with 300 pmol of either control or integrin β3 siRNA (sc-35677, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) in the presence of lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies) for 48 hours. Cells were then subjected to an additional transfection with 100 pmol of siRNA for 48 hours in order to maximize the knockdown effect.

Western blot analysis

Following treatment, cells were lysed with RIPA buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitor, then subjected to SDS-PAGE. Total proteins were then transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Immobilon-P; Millipore, Billerica, MA), blocked with 5% non-fat milk in 0.1% PBST, probed with primary antibodies (4 °C, overnight), and incubated with corresponding secondary antibodies (room temperature, 1 hour). After the enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) with Luminata Forte Western HRP substrate (Millipore), the protein bands were imaged using the ChemiDoc Touch Imaging System (Bio-Rad) and the band intensities were analyzed with the ImageJ Software (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij).

Real-time PCR

Following 24-hour platelet treatment, total RNA was extracted from EOMA cells using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Reverse-transcription was carried out using 1 µg of total RNA, and the levels of ITGB3 and ACTB mRNA were examined using SYBR Green Master Mix kit (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Forward primer of Actb: 5′-GGCTGTATTCCCCTCCATCG-3′, reverse primer of Actb: 5′-CCAGTTGGTAACAATGCCATGT-3′, Forward primer of Itgb3: 5′-CCACACGAGGCGTGAACTC-3′, reverse primer of Itgb3: 5′-CTTCAGGTTACATCGGGGTGA-3′.

Cell fractionation

Cells were plated in 6-well plates containing full medium for 24 hours, and then treated with platelets in DMEM supplemented with 0.5% FBS for another 24 hours. Cytoplasmic and membrane fractions were separated using a cell fractionation kit (Cell Signaling Technology). These fractions were then analyzed by Western blot analysis.

Immunoprecipitation

Following a 30-minute treatment with or without platelets, EOMA cells were lysed and immunoprecipitation was performed using a primary antibody directed against Akt (Cell Signaling Technology, #4691). Then a Pierce Crosslink IP Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Normal rabbit IgG was used as a negative control. Eluted proteins were resolved by the SDS-PAGE.

Murine tumorigenesis

To generate HE, the injection of EOMA cells in mice was performed as previously described12 with minor modifications. Briefly, EOMA cells were collected, resuspended in DMEM medium (4.5 × 106 cells in 200 μL) and subjected to dorsally subcutaneous injection in shaved C57BL/6 J mice. For knockdown of integrin β3, EOMA cells were first transfected with integrin β3 for 96 hours prior to injection. For inhibition of Akt, EOMA cells were co-injected with 2 μM GSK690693, followed by an additional intratumoral injection of 2 μM GSK690693 on day 3, when the tumors were palpable. Seven days post injection, mice were sacrificed. Following skin detachment HE tissues were harvested, and the extra fluid was removed to assess the tumor weights. The tumor volumes were measured using the formula volume = 0.52ab², where a and b indicated the long and short diameters of the tumors, respectively9.

Statistical analysis

Data were presented as mean ± SEM. At a minimum each experiment was repeated in triplicates (n = 3–6). Student t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett’s post hoc test, and two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test were performed depending on experiment. Statistical significance was set at P value < 0.05.

Ethics statement

All experiments and methods were conducted strictly with relevant guidelines and regulations of Jinan University. All animal procedures were performed according to the China’s animal welfare legislation for the protection of animals used for scientific purposes and approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Jinan University for care and use of laboratory animals. All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals and decrease their suffering.

References

  1. 1.

    Enzinger, F. M. & Weiss, S. W. Soft tissue tumors. (Mosby, 1983).

  2. 2.

    Requena, L. & Kutzner, H. Hemangioendothelioma. Seminars in diagnostic pathology 30, 29–44, doi:10.1053/j.semdp.2012.01.003 (2013).

  3. 3.

    O’Rafferty, C., O’Regan, G. M., Irvine, A. D. & Smith, O. P. Recent advances in the pathobiology and management of Kasabach-Merritt phenomenon. British journal of haematology 171, 38–51, doi:10.1111/bjh.13557 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Obeso, J., Weber, J. & Auerbach, R. A hemangioendothelioma-derived cell line: its use as a model for the study of endothelial cell biology. Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology 63, 259–269 (1990).

  5. 5.

    Roomi, M. W., Kalinovsky, T., Niedzwiecki, A. & Rath, M. Antiangiogenic properties of a nutrient mixture in a model of hemangioma. Experimental oncology 31, 214–219 (2009).

  6. 6.

    Zhu, Y. et al. Restoring transcription factor HoxA5 expression inhibits the growth of experimental hemangiomas in the brain. Journal of neuropathology and experimental neurology 68, 626–632, doi:10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181a491ce (2009).

  7. 7.

    Verheul, H. M., Panigrahy, D., Flynn, E., Pinedo, H. M. & D’Amato, R. J. Treatment of the Kasabach-Merritt syndrome with pegylated recombinant human megakaryocyte growth and development factor in mice: elevated platelet counts, prolonged survival, and tumor growth inhibition. Pediatric research 46, 562–565, doi:10.1203/00006450-199911000-00012 (1999).

  8. 8.

    Peng, L. X. et al. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt pathway is involved in pingyangmycininduced growth inhibition, apoptosis and reduction of invasive potential in EOMA mouse hemangioendothelioma cells. Molecular medicine reports 12, 8275–8281, doi:10.3892/mmr.2015.4447 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Guo, L. et al. Endostatin inhibits the tumorigenesis of hemangioendothelioma via downregulation of CXCL1. Molecular carcinogenesis 54, 1340–1353, doi:10.1002/mc.22210 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Biswas, A. et al. Endothelial cell tumor growth is Ape/ref-1 dependent. American journal of physiology. Cell physiology 309, C296–307, doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00022.2015 (2015).

  11. 11.

    Xiao, W. et al. Tetrandrine induces G1/S cell cycle arrest through the ROS/Akt pathway in EOMA cells and inhibits angiogenesis in vivo. International journal of oncology 46, 360–368, doi:10.3892/ijo.2014.2735 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Gordillo, G. M. et al. A key angiogenic role of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 in hemangioendothelioma proliferation. American journal of physiology. Cell physiology 287, C866–873, doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00238.2003 (2004).

  13. 13.

    Gordillo, G., Fang, H., Park, H. & Roy, S. Nox-4-dependent nuclear H2O2 drives DNA oxidation resulting in 8-OHdG as urinary biomarker and hemangioendothelioma formation. Antioxidants & redox signaling 12, 933–943, doi:10.1089/ars.2009.2917 (2010).

  14. 14.

    Dadras, S. S. et al. Prox-1 promotes invasion of kaposiform hemangioendotheliomas. The Journal of investigative dermatology 128, 2798–2806, doi:10.1038/jid.2008.176 (2008).

  15. 15.

    Zheng, N., Ding, X., Sun, A. & Jahan, R. PDK1 Activity Regulates Proliferation, Invasion and Growth of Hemangiomas. Cellular physiology and biochemistry: international journal of experimental cellular physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology 36, 1903–1910, doi:10.1159/000430159 (2015).

  16. 16.

    Ou, J. M. et al. Knockdown of IGF2R suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis in hemangioma cells in vitro and in vivo. International journal of oncology 45, 1241–1249, doi:10.3892/ijo.2014.2512 (2014).

  17. 17.

    Walsh, T. G., Metharom, P. & Berndt, M. C. The functional role of platelets in the regulation of angiogenesis. Platelets 26, 199–211, doi:10.3109/09537104.2014.909022 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Sabrkhany, S., Griffioen, A. W. & Oude Egbrink, M. G. The role of blood platelets in tumor angiogenesis. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1815, 189–196, doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2010.12.001 (2011).

  19. 19.

    Etulain, J., Fondevila, C., Negrotto, S. & Schattner, M. Platelet-mediated angiogenesis is independent of VEGF and fully inhibited by aspirin. British journal of pharmacology 170, 255–265, doi:10.1111/bph.12250 (2013).

  20. 20.

    Battinelli, E. M., Markens, B. A. & Italiano, J. E. Jr. Release of angiogenesis regulatory proteins from platelet alpha granules: modulation of physiologic and pathologic angiogenesis. Blood 118, 1359–1369, doi:10.1182/blood-2011-02-334524 (2011).

  21. 21.

    Hemalatha, T., Tiwari, M., Balachandran, C., Manohar, B. M. & Puvanakrishnan, R. Platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor mediates angiogenesis and antiapoptosis in rat aortic endothelial cells. Biochemistry and cell biology = Biochimie et biologie cellulaire 87, 883–893, doi:10.1139/o09-056 (2009).

  22. 22.

    Takagi, S., Takemoto, A., Takami, M., Oh-Hara, T. & Fujita, N. Platelets promote osteosarcoma cell growth through activation of the platelet-derived growth factor receptor-Akt signaling axis. Cancer science 105, 983–988, doi:10.1111/cas.12464 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Wu, H. et al. The angiogenic responses induced by release of angiogenic proteins from tumor cell-activated platelets are regulated by distinct molecular pathways. IUBMB life 67, 626–633, doi:10.1002/iub.1406 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Yougbare, I. et al. Maternal anti-platelet beta3 integrins impair angiogenesis and cause intracranial hemorrhage. The Journal of clinical investigation 125, 1545–1556, doi:10.1172/JCI77820 (2015).

  25. 25.

    Rhee, J. S. et al. The functional role of blood platelet components in angiogenesis. Thrombosis and haemostasis 92, 394–402, doi:10.1160/TH03-04-0213 (2004).

  26. 26.

    Petitclerc, E. et al. Integrin alpha(v)beta3 promotes M21 melanoma growth in human skin by regulating tumor cell survival. Cancer research 59, 2724–2730 (1999).

  27. 27.

    Avraamides, C. J., Garmy-Susini, B. & Varner, J. A. Integrins in angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis. Nature reviews. Cancer 8, 604–617, doi:10.1038/nrc2353 (2008).

  28. 28.

    Jiang, P. et al. Phagocytosis of platelets enhances endothelial cell survival under serum deprivation. Exp Biol Med (Maywood) 240, 876–883, doi:10.1177/1535370214565076 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Battinelli, E. M. et al. Anticoagulation inhibits tumor cell-mediated release of platelet angiogenic proteins and diminishes platelet angiogenic response. Blood 123, 101–112, doi:10.1182/blood-2013-02-485011 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Peterson, J. E. et al. Normal ranges of angiogenesis regulatory proteins in human platelets. American journal of hematology 85, 487–493, doi:10.1002/ajh.21732 (2010).

  31. 31.

    Italiano, J. E. Jr. & Battinelli, E. M. Selective sorting of alpha-granule proteins. Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis: JTH 7(Suppl 1), 173–176, doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03387.x (2009).

  32. 32.

    Fukuhara, S. et al. Angiopoietin-1/Tie2 receptor signaling in vascular quiescence and angiogenesis. Histology and histopathology 25, 387–396 (2010).

  33. 33.

    Chandrasekaran, L. et al. Cell contact-dependent activation of alpha3beta1 integrin modulates endothelial cell responses to thrombospondin-1. Molecular biology of the cell 11, 2885–2900 (2000).

  34. 34.

    Gong, Y. et al. Sprouty4 regulates endothelial cell migration via modulating integrin beta3 stability through c-Src. Angiogenesis 16, 861–875, doi:10.1007/s10456-013-9361-x (2013).

  35. 35.

    Li, W. et al. An essential role for the Id1/PI3K/Akt/NFkB/survivin signalling pathway in promoting the proliferation of endothelial progenitor cells in vitro. Molecular and cellular biochemistry 363, 135–145, doi:10.1007/s11010-011-1166-x (2012).

  36. 36.

    Liu, Z. J. et al. Inhibition of endothelial cell proliferation by Notch1 signaling is mediated by repressing MAPK and PI3K/Akt pathways and requires MAML1. FASEB journal: official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology 20, 1009–1011, doi:10.1096/fj.05-4880fje (2006).

  37. 37.

    Abid, M. R. et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor activates PI3K/Akt/forkhead signaling in endothelial cells. Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology 24, 294–300, doi:10.1161/01.ATV.0000110502.10593.06 (2004).

  38. 38.

    Wassmer, S. C. et al. TGF-beta1 released from activated platelets can induce TNF-stimulated human brain endothelium apoptosis: a new mechanism for microvascular lesion during cerebral malaria. J Immunol 176, 1180–1184 (2006).

  39. 39.

    Sindram, D., Porte, R. J., Hoffman, M. R., Bentley, R. C. & Clavien, P. A. Platelets induce sinusoidal endothelial cell apoptosis upon reperfusion of the cold ischemic rat liver. Gastroenterology 118, 183–191 (2000).

  40. 40.

    Ko, E. M. et al. Monoclonal antibody to CD9 inhibits platelet-induced human endothelial cell proliferation. Molecules and cells 22, 70–77 (2006).

  41. 41.

    Marcondes, S., Lafay, M., Brohard-Bohn, B., de Nucci, G. & Rendu, F. Platelets induce human umbilical vein endothelial cell proliferation through P-selectin. Life sciences 66, 1817–1826 (2000).

  42. 42.

    Qi, C. et al. P-Selectin-Mediated Adhesion between Platelets and Tumor Cells Promotes Intestinal Tumorigenesis in Apc(Min/+) Mice. International journal of biological sciences 11, 679–687, doi:10.7150/ijbs.11589 (2015).

  43. 43.

    Cho, M. S. et al. Platelets increase the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells. Blood 120, 4869–4872, doi:10.1182/blood-2012-06-438598 (2012).

  44. 44.

    Yuan, L. & Liu, X. Platelets are associated with xenograft tumor growth and the clinical malignancy of ovarian cancer through an angiogenesis-dependent mechanism. Molecular medicine reports 11, 2449–2458, doi:10.3892/mmr.2014.3082 (2015).

  45. 45.

    Wang, Y. & Zhang, H. Platelet-induced inhibition of tumor cell growth. Thrombosis research 123, 324–330, doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2008.06.021 (2008).

  46. 46.

    Radomski, M. W., Jenkins, D. C., Holmes, L. & Moncada, S. Human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells: differential nitric oxide synthesis determines their ability to aggregate platelets. Cancer research 51, 6073–6078 (1991).

  47. 47.

    Gasic, G. J., Koch, P. A., Hsu, B., Gasic, T. B. & Niewiarowski, S. Thrombogenic activity of mouse and human tumors: effects on platelets, coagulation, and fibrinolysis, and possible significance for metastases. Zeitschrift fur Krebsforschung und klinische Onkologie. Cancer research and clinical oncology 86, 263–277 (1976).

  48. 48.

    Gasic, G. J. Role of plasma, platelets, and endothelial cells in tumor metastasis. Cancer metastasis reviews 3, 99–114 (1984).

  49. 49.

    Pearlstein, E., Ambrogio, C., Gasic, G. & Karpatkin, S. Inhibition of the platelet-aggregating activity of two human adenocarcinomas of the colon and an anaplastic murine tumor with a specific thrombin inhibitor, dansylarginine N-(3-ethyl-1,5-pentanediyl)amide. Cancer research 41, 4535–4539 (1981).

  50. 50.

    Fens, M. H. et al. Angiogenic endothelium shows lactadherin-dependent phagocytosis of aged erythrocytes and apoptotic cells. Blood 111, 4542–4550, doi:10.1182/blood-2007-06-094763 (2008).

  51. 51.

    Dasgupta, S. K., Le, A., Chavakis, T., Rumbaut, R. E. & Thiagarajan, P. Developmental endothelial locus-1 (Del-1) mediates clearance of platelet microparticles by the endothelium. Circulation 125, 1664–1672, doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.068833 (2012).

  52. 52.

    Peng, Q. et al. Mechanisms of xenogeneic baboon platelet aggregation and phagocytosis by porcine liver sinusoidal endothelial cells. PloS one 7, e47273, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047273 (2012).

  53. 53.

    Brizzi, M. F., Tarone, G. & Defilippi, P. Extracellular matrix, integrins, and growth factors as tailors of the stem cell niche. Current opinion in cell biology 24, 645–651, doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2012.07.001 (2012).

  54. 54.

    Zheng, G. et al. alpha3 Integrin of Cell-Cell Contact Mediates Kidney Fibrosis by Integrin-Linked Kinase in Proximal Tubular E-Cadherin Deficient Mice. The American journal of pathology 186, 1847–1860, doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2016.03.015 (2016).

  55. 55.

    Proenca-Ferreira, R. et al. Endothelial activation by platelets from sickle cell anemia patients. PloS one 9, e89012, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089012 (2014).

  56. 56.

    Dovizio, M. et al. Pharmacological inhibition of platelet-tumor cell cross-talk prevents platelet-induced overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 in HT29 human colon carcinoma cells. Molecular pharmacology 84, 25–40, doi:10.1124/mol.113.084988 (2013).

  57. 57.

    Trikha, M. et al. Multiple roles for platelet GPIIb/IIIa and alphavbeta3 integrins in tumor growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis. Cancer research 62, 2824–2833 (2002).

  58. 58.

    Ji, Y. et al. Signaling pathways in the development of infantile hemangioma. Journal of hematology & oncology 7, 13, doi:10.1186/1756-8722-7-13 (2014).

  59. 59.

    Carol, H. et al. Initial testing (stage 1) of the Akt inhibitor GSK690693 by the pediatric preclinical testing program. Pediatric blood & cancer 55, 1329–1337, doi:10.1002/pbc.22710 (2010).

  60. 60.

    Altomare, D. A. et al. GSK690693 delays tumor onset and progression in genetically defined mouse models expressing activated Akt. Clinical cancer research: an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 16, 486–496, doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1026 (2010).

  61. 61.

    Zhang, J. et al. Altered long non-coding RNA transcriptomic profiles in brain microvascular endothelium after cerebral ischemia. Experimental neurology 277, 162–170, doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2015.12.014 (2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571408 and 81601065), the Guangdong Natural Science Foundation (2016A030313105), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities to Jinan University (21616339), and the Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (B14036). The authors thank Drs Panpan Yu and Ang Li (Jinan University) for help with reagents.

Author information

X.S. and Y.R. conceived and supervised the study; K.S. and X.C. funded the reagent and personnel. R.G., Y.C., Q.Z., H.X., D.B., X.L. and C.Q. carried out the experiments and analyzed data; X.S. and Y.R. were involved in writing the manuscript. All the authors had final approval of the submitted manuscript.

Correspondence to Yi Ren or Xiao-Ming Chen.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.