Introduction

The rare-earth zirconates, with chemical formula A2Zr2O7 (A = Y or another rare earth elements)1, 2, exhibit ordered pyrochlore-type structure or defect fluorite-type structure, which is mainly governed by the ionic radii of A3+ and Zr4+ 3. They have attracted the attention of many researchers, due to their good chemical and mechanical stability, excellent catalytic activity, high ionic conductivity, ferromagnetism, luminescence as well as strong resistance to amorphization under irradiation4,5,6,7,8. Owing to these outstanding properties, the rare-earth zirconates have a wide range of technical applications, e.g., ceramic thermal barrier coating9, 10, oxidation catalyst5, 11, solid electrolyte12, hosts of actinides in nuclear waste13 and oxygen gas sensor14.

Of the zirconate pyrochlores, Gd2Zr2O7 is of special interest due to its good thermo-physical properties15,16,17,18,19. Shimamura et al. have measured the thermal expansion of a series of zirconate pyrochlores employing high-temperature X-ray diffraction and found that the thermal expansion coefficient of Gd2Zr2O7 is larger than other zirconates during the temperature range of 400–1600 °C20. The thermal conductivity of rare-earth zirconates has been investigated by Wang et al.21, who reported that the thermal conductivity of 1.15–1.43 W/mK for Gd2Zr2O7 is lower than that of Yb2Zr2O7, Dy2Zr2O7 and 7YSZ between 25 °C and 800 °C. In recent years, a great number of investigations have been carried out on substitution of lanthanides for Gd-site to engineer the thermo-physical properties of Gd2Zr2O7 22,23,24,25. Guo et al. synthesized (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7) using solid state reaction and suggested that the thermal conductivity of 0.88–1.00 W/mk for (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7 is about 20% lower than that of Gd2Zr2O7 (1.18 W/mk) at 1400 °C26. Wan et al. predicted that, among the (LaxGd1-x)2Zr2O7 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) systems, the LaGdZr2O7 has the minimum thermal conductivity, which is about 20–25% lower than that of Gd2Zr2O7 18. In recent years, both Liu et al.19. and Pan et al.23 reported that the thermal diffusivity of (SmxGd1-x)2Zr2O7 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) are lower than those of pure Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7. Especially, Sm2Zr2O7-Gd2Zr2O7 solid solutions have lower Young’s modulus than (LaxGd1-x)2Zr2O7 (0 < x < 1) at room temperature and larger thermal expansion coefficients than (Gd1-xYbx)2Zr2O7 (x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7) from 300 °C to 900 °C18, 19, 23, 26. These investigations are mainly experimental studies, and the related theoretical investigations are relatively much fewer27, 28.

Very recently, the Th4+ ion incorporation into Gd3+ and Zr4+ sites in Gd2Zr2O7 was investigated by first-principles calculations28. Unexpectedly, the aliovalent substitution of Th4+ for Gd3+ turns out to be thermodynamically stable and such substitution even results in better thermo-physical properties than the pure Gd2Zr2O7 28. This thus arouses our interest that whether the aliovalent substitution of Ln3+ (Ln = lanthanide elements) for Zr4+ sites are energetically and mechanically stable or not? If yes, will the substitution of Ln3+ for Zr4+ sites cause different thermo-mechanical properties from the isovalent substitution of Ln3+ for Gd3+ sites? In this study, we choose Sm3+ as a model and investigate the phase stability and thermo-physical properties of Gd2Zr2O7 with isovalent and aliovalent substitution of Ln3+ for Gd3+ and Zr4+ sites by employing the density functional theory (DFT) method. It reveals that the SmyGd2-yZr2O7 retains the pyrochlore structure and the isovalent substitution of Sm3+ for Gd3+ sites influences slightly the mechanical and thermal properties of Gd2Zr2O7. On the other hand, the aliovalent substitution of Sm3+ for Zr4+ sites induces pyrochlore-to-fluorite structural transition and affects significantly the elastic moduli, Debye temperature and thermal conductivity. The presented results provide a new way to tune the thermo-physical properties of Gd2Zr2O7 and will have important implications in advancing the further related experimental and theoretical studies for its applications under high temperature.

Results and Discussion

Structural stability of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 2)

In this study, Sm substitution for both Gd-site and Zr-site in Gd2Zr2O7 with different concentrations are considered, resulting in SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (y = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2). The geometrical structures of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 are optimized firstly. In order to test whether local density approximation (LDA)29 or generalized gradient approximation (GGA)30 is more appropriate to describe the exchange-correlation interaction between electrons, both LDA and GGA methods are employed to relax the structures of Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7. For Gd2Zr2O7, the lattice constant a 0 and x O48f obtained by LDA are 10.451 Å and 0.342, respectively, agreeing well with the experimental values of a 0 = 10.472 Å and x O48f  = 0.34531, 32. As compared with the LDA results, the values of a 0  = 10.641 Å and x O48f = 0.339 calculated by GGA deviate much more from the experimental results. As for Sm2Zr2O7, the LDA calculations yield a lattice constant of 10.531 Å and an x O48f parameter of 0.34, which are also comparable with the experimental data of a 0  = 10.514 Å and x O48f  = 0.34231, 32. On the other hand, the GGA results of a 0  = 10.715 Å and x O48f = 0.337 are in bad agreement with the experimental measurement. Obviously, the structural parameters obtained by LDA are in better agreement with experiments than the GGA method. The LDA method, thus, is employed in all the subsequent calculations. The calculated lattice constant a 0 and x O48f for SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 as a function of Sm content are plotted in Fig. 1a and b, respectively. As Sm substitutes for Gd-site in Gd2Zr2O7, it is found that the resulted SmyGd2-yZr2O7 compositions remain the ideal pyrochlore structure. Especially, the lattice constant a 0 and the O48f positional parameter  x O48f increase and decrease linearly with the increasing Sm concentration, suggesting that he lattice parameters of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 follow well the Vegard’s law, i.e., \(a({{\rm{Sm}}}_{{\rm{y}}}{{\rm{Gd}}}_{{\rm{2}}-{\rm{y}}}{{\rm{Zr}}}_{{\rm{2}}}{{\rm{O}}}_{{\rm{7}}})=\frac{2-y}{2}\times a({{\rm{Gd}}}_{{\rm{2}}}{{\rm{Zr}}}_{{\rm{2}}}{{\rm{O}}}_{{\rm{7}}})+\frac{y}{2}\times a({{\rm{Sm}}}_{{\rm{2}}}{{\rm{Zr}}}_{{\rm{2}}}{{\rm{O}}}_{{\rm{7}}})\). These results indicate that the Gd2Zr2O7-Sm2Zr2O7 solid solution is formed by Sm substitution into Gd-site in Gd2Zr2O7, agreeing well with the experimental observation19. Experimentally, Liu et al. also found that the lattice constants increase linearly with different compositions for (SmxGd1−x)2Zr2O7 system from x = 0 (Gd2Zr2O7) to x = 1.0 (Sm2Zr2O7), and the Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7 ceramics are infinitely solid solution19. As Sm substitutes for Zr-site, i.e. Gd2SmyZr2-yO7, the lattice constants increase more significantly than the case of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and there is a small deviation from the Vegard’s law. It is noticeable that the x O48f of Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 increases remarkably with the increasing Sm content instead of decreasing as the case of SmyGd2-yZr2O7. In A2B2O7 pyrochlores, the x O48f positional parameter can be used to describe the degree of distortion of < B-O > octahedron and it is located within the range of 0.3125 to 0.375. Generally, the material with x O48f closer to 0.3125 has the ordered pyrochlore structure and the one with x O48f closer to 0.375 is more likely to undergo a transition from pyrochlore to defect-fluorite structure31, 33,34,35. Our calculations show that the x O48f for Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 with high content of Sm approaches to be 0.375, implying that order-disorder transition may occur in the systems. The schematic view of optimized configurations of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 is illustrated in Fig. 2. As can be seen in the figure, SmyGd2-yZr2O7 still maintains the pyrochlore-type structure, while Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 exhibits defective fluorite-type structure due to the significant disordering of the anions. These results suggest that Sm substitution for Gd-site has minor effects on the pyrochlore structure of Gd2Zr2O7, as evidenced by the small changes in the < Gd-O > and < Zr-O > bonding distances shown in Table 1. On the other hand, structural transformation from ordered pyrochlore to disordered defect-fluorite structure is induced by the substitution of Sm for Zr-site, which is accompanied by the weakened interaction of < Sm-O48f  > and < Gd-O8b  > bonds (see Table 1).

Figure 1
figure 1

Variation of (a) lattice constants and (b) positional parameter x O48f for SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 2) as a function of Sm content.

Figure 2
figure 2

Schematic view of the optimized configurations for (a) Gd2Zr2O7, (b) Sm0.5Gd1.5Zr2O7, (c) SmGdZr2O7, (d) Sm1.5Gd0.5Zr2O7, (e) Sm2Zr2O7, (f) Gd2Sm0.5Zr1.5O7, (g) Gd2SmZrO7, (h) Gd2Sm1.5Zr0.5O7, (i) Gd2Sm2O7. The blue, purple, green and red spheres represent Sm, Gd, Zr and O atoms, respectively.

Table 1 The bonding distances (Å) between atoms in SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 2).

In the literature, it has been reported that the Madelung binding energy reduces with the increasing x O48f and the thermal expansion increases with the decreasing Madelung binding energy20. Considering that Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 has larger x O48f than SmyGd2-yZr2O7, we thus suggest that smaller Madelung binding energy exists in the Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 and they probably have larger thermal expansion coefficient. Meanwhile, the disordering of oxygen ions in Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 may increase the phonon scattering, which will reduce the mean free path of the phonon and result in small phonon thermal conductivity.

Elastic constants and elastic moduli of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 2)

In order to investigate the mechanical properties of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 compounds, we further calculate their elastic constants based on the optimized structures. For a cubic crystal, there are three independent elastic constants, i.e. C11, C12 and C44, where C11 refers to the uniaxial deformation along the [001] direction, C12 is the pure shear stress at (110) crystal plane along the [110] direction, and C44 is a pure shear deformation on the (100) crystal plane4. The values of these three elastic constants for all compounds are summarized in Table 2. For Gd2Zr2O7, our calculated values of C11, C12 and C44 are 325.6, 126.3 and 94.0 GPa, respectively, which are found to be close to the results of C11 = 314.2 GPa, C12 = 126.2 GPa and C44 = 96.2 GPa for Sm2Zr2O7. It should be pointed out that in this study the Gd 4 f and Sm 4 f electrons are treated as core electrons. In order to investigate if these f electrons will influence the mechanical properties of Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7, we further consider the Gd 4 f and Sm 4 f electrons as valence electrons and carry out LDA + U calculations, in which the effective U values are taken to be 6 eV for Gd 4 f and 8 eV for Sm 4 f electrons4. For Gd2Zr2O7, the LDA + U results of C11 = 316.9 GPa, C12 = 123.0 GPa and C44 = 94.7 GPa are very similar to the LDA calculations. In the case of Sm2Zr2O7, the calculated C11 = 276.9 GPa, C12 = 114.2 GPa, and C44 = 112.6 GPa are deviated from the LDA results. Further investigation shows that the Sm2Zr2O7 is elastically anisotropic, which is not consistent with the elastic isotropy of Sm2Zr2O7. Hence, the Gd 4 f and Sm 4 f electrons are frozen in our calculations and all the calculations are carried out by the LDA method. These results indicate that Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7 may exhibit very similar mechanical properties, agreeing well with the experiment carried out by Shimamura et al.20. The elastic constants reported by Lan et al. employing GGA method are generally smaller than our LDA results, while they also found that the results of Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7 are very similar to each other36. We find that the mechanical stability criteria, i.e., (C11-C12) > 0, C44 > 0, and (C11 + 2C12) > 01, are satisfied for all compounds, indicating that Sm-substituted Gd2Zr2O7 compounds are mechanically stable.

Table 2 Elastic constants (C11, C12, C44, in GPa), bulk modulus (B, in GPa), shear modulus (G, in GPa) and Young’s modulus (E, in GPa) of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 2).

The calculated elastic constants for both SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 2) as a function of Sm content are plotted in Fig. 3. It is noted that Sm substitution for Gd-site results in very small changes in the elastic constants and the mixed Gd2Zr2O7-Sm2Zr2O7 phases have similar values with the pure states. As the Sm substitutes for Zr-site, the values of C11 are strikingly decreased with the increasing Sm content, implying that the compositions with high content of Sm are more likely to undergo the uniaxial deformation along the [001] direction. On the other hand, the C12 and C44 slightly increase and decrease with the Sm incorporation, respectively. Generally, the changes in the elastic constants of Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 are more significant than those of SmyGd2-yZr2O7, meaning that the effects of Sm incorporation into Gd-site on the mechanical properties of Gd2Zr2O7 are nearly negligible whereas Sm incorporation into Zr-site has remarkable influence. This may be mainly due to the fact that Gd3+ and Sm3+ have similar mass (Gd3+: 157.25 amu; Sm3+: 150.3 amu) and cation size (Gd3+: 1.053 Å; Sm3+: 1.079 Å) and Sm substitution for Gd-site affects the structural properties of Gd2Zr2O7 slightly, while the mass and radius for Gd3+ are largely different from the mass of 91.22 amu and the radius of 0.72 Å for Zr4+ 19, 27 and an order-disorder phase transition has occurred in Gd2SmyZr2-yO7.

Figure 3
figure 3

Variation of elastic constants (C11, C12 and C44) for (a) SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and (b) Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 2) with Sm content.

Based on the three elastic constants, the bulk modulus (B), Young’s modulus (E) and shear modulus (G) can be deduced under Voigt-Reuss-Hill (VRH) approximation37, i.e., B = (C11 + 2C12)/3, E = 9BG/(3B + G), G = ((C11-C12 + 3C44)/5 + 5(C11-C12)C44/(4C44 + 3(C11-C12)))/21, 38,39,40. The values of bulk modulus, Young’s modulus and shear modulus are shown in Table 2, together with available experimental and theoretical results in the literature20, 36. As compared with the experimental measurement, our calculated elastic moduli for Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7 are overestimated slightly. This may be resulted from the employed LDA method, which generally underestimates the lattice constant whereas overestimates the mechanical modulus41. Besides, the defects and impurities in the sample experimentally may also lead to the underestimated values of the B and G41. Variation of the elastic moduli for SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 with the Sm content is illustrated in Fig. 4. As expected, the elastic moduli for SmyGd2-yZr2O7 vary slightly with the Sm content since the elastic constants for all compositions are very similar to each other. Different from the case of SmyGd2-yZr2O7, the bulk modulus, Young’s modulus and shear modulus for Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 all decrease sharply with the increasing Sm content, especially the Young’s modulus. Consequently, the Gd2Sm2O7 has the minimum Young’s modulus of 87 GPa, minimum shear modulus of 31 GPa and minimum bulk modulus of 151 GPa. These results indicate that the Gd2Sm2O7 has good compliance2 due to the lowest bulk modulus and the lowest Young’s modulus, which will produce relatively smaller residual stresses in the coating system under the severe conditions and result in better thermo-mechanical stability23.

Figure 4
figure 4

Variation of elastic moduli for (a) SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and (b) Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 2) as a function of Sm content. B: bulk modulus; G: shear modulus; E: Young’s modulus.

Elastic anisotropy, ductility and Debye temperature of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 2)

The elastic anisotropy, which is correlated with the possibility of the appearance of microcracks, is an important mechanical property of materials42, 43. For a crystal, the elastic anisotropy of materials can be evaluated by the AU (universal elastic anisotropy index), which can be calculated by AU = 5 GV/GR + BV/BR-644, with V and R representing the Voigt and Reuss approximation, respectively38, 40. The AU value of zero refers to isotropic mechanical properties, otherwise defines the anisotropy44. The calculated results are shown in Table 3. Obviously, the values of AU are very close to zero in the case of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 2), which indicates that all compounds are of elastic isotropy. However, the crystals show strong anisotropy in the Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (0.5 ≤ y ≤ 2) system, as the AU values have large deviation from zero and they increase with the increasing Sm content. The sharp increase from 0.920 for Gd2Sm1.5Zr0.5O7 to 4.738 for Gd2Sm2O7 may be caused by the pyrochlore-to-defect fluorite structural transition.

Table 3 Pugh’s indicator (G/B), elastic anisotropy index (AU), sound wave velocity (v m , in m/s), Debye temperature (Θ, in K) and Poisson’s ratio (σ) of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 2).

Another important mechanical property of materials is the ductility, which is often evaluated by the Pugh’s indicator (G/B ratio)45. The Pugh’s indicator of 0.5 is a boundary of brittleness or ductility, i.e., if G/B > 0.5, the material tends to be brittle; otherwise, the material is ductile46. The calculated Pugh’s indicators are presented in Table 3. For the compounds of SmyGd2-yZr2O7, the values are close to 0.5, and are located within the range of 0.499 to 0.505. As for Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (y = 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2), the G/B values of 0.205–0.428 are much smaller. Obviously, the Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 compositions have better ductility than the SmyGd2-yZr2O7 compounds. The Poisson’s ratio (σ) can also be used to evaluate the relative ductility of materials. Generally, the σ values are close to 0.1 and 0.33 for brittle covalent material and ductile metallic material, respectively46, 47. The σ values are 0.286 and 0.284 for Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7, respectively, which are comparable with the experimental data of 0.274–0.276 for Gd2Zr2O7 and 0.277–0.278 for Sm2Zr2O7 20, 48. As shown in Table 3, the Poisson’s ratio are ~0.285 for SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and vary from 0.313 to 0.404 for Gd2SmyZr2-yO7, meaning that the latter compositions are more ductile, which is consistent with the results obtained from the Pugh’s indicator.

In this study, the Debye temperature that is related to the hardness and thermal expansion coefficient of materials20, 49 is also estimated for Sm-contained Gd2Zr2O7 by \(\Theta =\frac{h}{{k}_{B}}{[\frac{3n}{4\pi }(\frac{{N}_{A}\rho }{M})]}^{\frac{1}{3}}{v}_{m}\). Here, h is the Planck’s constant, k B is the Boltzmann’s constant, n is the number of atoms in molecular, N A is the Avogadro’s constant, ρ is the density, M is the molecular mass and v m is the sound wave velocity. The v m can be deduced by \({v}_{m}={(\frac{3{({v}_{t}{v}_{l})}^{3}}{2{v}_{t}^{3}+{v}_{l}^{3}})}^{\frac{1}{3}}\), where \({v}_{l}={(\frac{B+4G/3}{\rho })}^{\frac{1}{2}}\) is the longitudinal sound velocity and \({v}_{t}={(\frac{G}{\rho })}^{\frac{1}{2}}\) is the transverse sound velocity41. As one can see from Table 3, Sm substitution for Gd-site has slight effects on the Debye temperature of Gd2Zr2O7 and all the compositions have very similar results. However, as Sm substitutes for the Zr-site, the Debye temperature decreases considerably with the increasing Sm content. The Gd2Sm2O7 has the lowest Debye temperature of 341.7 K, which is about 44.3% lower than that of Gd2Zr2O7. These results suggest that Sm incorporation into Zr-site causes weaker interaction of chemical bonds and the Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 with high content of Sm will have much larger thermal expansion coefficient than Gd2Zr2O7.

Electronic structure of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (0 ≤ y ≤ 2)

In order to investigate how Sm incorporation influences the electronic structure of Gd2Zr2O7, the atomic projected density of state (DOS) distribution of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 are analyzed and plotted in Fig. 5 and Fig. 6, respectively. In Fig. 7a and b, the orbital projected DOS for Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7 are also presented. For Gd2Zr2O7, the valence band maximum (VBM) are mainly contributed by O 2p states hybridized with Zr 4d, Gd 5d and Gd 5p orbitals, and the conduction band minimum (CBM) are mainly contributed by Zr 4d states and O 2p states. The obtained band gap of 2.55 eV is comparable with the value of 2.71 eV reported by Wang et al.50. For Sm2Zr2O7, the DOS distribution is similar to that of Gd2Zr2O7, i.e., the VBM are mainly contributed by O 2p states hybridized with Zr 4d, Sm 5d and Sm 5p states, and the CBM are mainly dominated by Zr 4d states and O 2p states. Considering that Sm and Gd are heavy atoms and the spin-orbit coupling (SOC) may affect the band gap and electronic structure of the investigated systems, we further calculate the density of state distribution of Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7 employing the LDA + SOC method. A comparison of LDA and LDA + SOC results for both compounds is illustrated in Fig. 8. For Gd2Zr2O7, the band gap value of 2.64 eV by LDA + SOC is close to the value of 2.55 eV by LDA method. In the case of Sm2Zr2O7, the band gap values are 2.9 eV and 2.83 eV for LDA + SOC and LDA calculations, respectively. As shown in Fig. 8, the atomic projected and total DOS obtained by LDA with and without spin-orbit coupling exhibit very similar characters for both compounds. These results suggest that the spin-orbit coupling has slight effects on our results and such effects are thus not considered for the mixed states. When Sm substitutes for Gd-site, the Sm 5d orbitals also contribute to the VBM and interacts with the oxygen. Meanwhile, the insulating character of Gd2Zr2O7 is kept and the band gap is broadened with the increasing Sm content, i.e., 2.62, 2.68, 2.76 and 2.83 eV for Sm0.5Gd1.5Zr2O7, SmGdZr2O7, Sm1.5Gd0.5Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7, respectively. In addition, the hybridization of O 2p and Zr 4d is slightly affected by the incorporation of Sm. As for Gd2SmyZr2-yO7, the hybridization of O 2p states with Zr 4d, Gd 5d and Sm 5d orbitals also dominates the VBM. It is interesting to find that Sm incorporation causes electrons distributing on the fermi levels and the number of electrons increases with the increasing Sm content. This results in an insulating-to-metallic transition and the Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 has much stronger electronic conductivity than the pure state. In the meantime, the Gd2Zr2O7 and SmyGd2-yZr2O7 do not have any magnetism, whereas the Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 compositions exhibit strong ferromagnetic states due to the different charge states of Sm and Zr.

Figure 5
figure 5

Projected density of state distribution for SmyGd2-yZr2O7 (y = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2). The Fermi level is located at 0 eV.

Figure 6
figure 6

Projected density of state distribution for Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (y = 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2). The Fermi level is located at 0 eV.

Figure 7
figure 7

Projected density of state distribution for Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7. The Fermi level is located at 0 eV.

Figure 8
figure 8

Projected and total density of state distribution for Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7 obtained by the LDA and LDA + SOC methods. The Fermi level is located at 0 eV.

Obviously, Sm incorporation into Gd-site and Zr-site of Gd2Zr2O7 causes very different electronic structures, i.e., the SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 are mainly of insulating and metallic characters, respectively. These results indicate that the thermal conductivity of SmyGd2-yZr2O7 are mainly contributed by phonons, while both phonons and electrons contribute to the thermal conductivity of Gd2SmyZr2-yO7.

Summary

In this work, a systematic study based on the DFT method is carried out to investigate the effects of Sm substitution for Gd-site and Zr-site in Gd2Zr2O7 on its structural stability, mechanical properties, Debye temperature and electronic structures. It is shown that the SmyGd2-yZr2O7 compositions keep the pyrochlore structure and their lattice parameters follow well the Vegard’s law, indicative of the formation of Gd2Zr2O7-Sm2Zr2O7 solid solution. On the other hand, Sm substitution for Zr-site influences the structure significantly and a pyrochlore-to-defect fluorite structural transition occurs. The SmyGd2-yZr2O7 compositions are of elastic isotropy and their elastic moduli, ductility, Debye temperature and band gap vary slightly with the Sm content. However, the Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 compounds show strong elastic anisotropy and their bulk, Young’s and shear moduli all decrease sharply with the increasing Sm content. Consequently, the Gd2Sm2O7 has the minimum Young’s modulus of 87 GPa, minimum shear modulus of 31 GPa and minimum bulk modulus of 151 GPa. Meanwhile, both the Pugh’s indicator and Poisson’s ratio suggested that the Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 have better ductility than the SmyGd2-yZr2O7. As the Sm substitutes for Zr-site, the Debye temperature decreases considerably with the increasing Sm content and the Debye temperature of 341.7 K for Gd2Sm2O7 is about 44.3% lower than that of Gd2Zr2O7. In addition, the insulating character of Gd2Zr2O7 is kept in the system of SmyGd2-yZr2O7, while the Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 compositions exhibit metallic characters. Our calculations demonstrate that substituting Sm for Zr-site is an effective approach to tailor the mechanical and thermal properties of Gd2Zr2O7.

Methods

In this work, first-principles total energy calculations within the DFT framework are carried out. All calculations are performed with the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP)51, 52. The interaction between electrons and ions is described by the projector augmented wave method52, 53. All computations are based on a supercell containing 88 atoms. The convergence criteria for total energies and forces are 10−6 eV and 10−6 eV/Å, respectively. The structural relaxation is carried out at variable volume. In order to determine the values of cutoff energy and k-point sampling, a series of test calculation has been carried out. Figure 9 shows the variation of total energy of Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7 with cutoff energy and k-point sampling, which leads to our calculation being performed with a 2 × 2 × 2 Monkhorst-Pack k-mesh for Brillouin-zone integrations and a cutoff energy of 600 eV for plane wave. For SmyGd2-yZr2O7 and Gd2SmyZr2-yO7 (y = 0.5, 1, 1.5), the structure models are constructed by the special quasirandom structure approach54,55,56.

Figure 9
figure 9

Variation of the total energy of Gd2Zr2O7 and Sm2Zr2O7 with (a) k-point sampling (the cutoff energy is fixed at 650 eV) and (b) cutoff energy (the k-point sampling is fixed at 2 × 2 × 2).