## Abstract

Here we study single-crystalline silicon nanobeams having 470 nm width and 80 nm thickness cross section, where we produce tortuous thermal paths (*i*.*e*. labyrinths) by introducing slits to control the impact of the unobstructed “line-of-sight” (LOS) between the heat source and heat sink. The labyrinths range from straight nanobeams with a complete LOS along the entire length to nanobeams in which the LOS ranges from partially to entirely blocked by introducing slits, *s* = 95, 195, 245, 295 and 395 nm. The measured thermal conductivity of the samples decreases monotonically from ~47 W m^{−1} K^{−1} for straight beam to ~31 W m^{−1} K^{−1} for slit width of 395 nm. A model prediction through a combination of the Boltzmann transport equation and *ab initio* calculations shows an excellent agreement with the experimental data to within ~8%. The model prediction for the most tortuous path (*s* = 395 nm) is reduced by ~14% compared to a straight beam of equivalent cross section. This study suggests that LOS is an important metric for characterizing and interpreting phonon propagation in nanostructures.

## Introduction

Understanding phonon transport is crucial to engineering novel nanoscale systems, such as thermal energy storage^{1,2,3}, heat-assisted memory^{4, 5}, sensors^{6, 7}, and integrated nanoelectronics^{8, 9}. Previous studies of phonons in single crystalline silicon have established an increasingly comprehensive microscopic model of how phonons interact with introduced nanoscale features and boundaries^{10}. In many nanostructures, *e*.*g*., nanobeams and nanowires, a key geometric feature is an unobstructed line-of-sight (LOS) for propagation through the medium. In these nanostructures, the boundaries are aligned along the dominant direction of heat flow and the LOS along the dominant direction of heat flow is typically much longer than the phonon mean free paths (MFPs)^{11,12,13,14,15}. For the case of nanostructures with boundaries or interfaces that are oriented normal to the direction of heat flow, much progress has been made for superlattices and related nanostructures and has illustrated the impact of ballistic and even coherent transport^{16,17,18,19,20}. However, the interplay of these two types of interfaces in practical structures remains both insufficiently understood and a barrier to the effective simulation of many practical and applied nanostructures.

In complex nanostructures, phonon scattering off longitudinal boundaries and obstructions (*i*.*e*. scattering sites oriented normal to the net heat flux vector) reduces the thermal conductivity. For example, thin films containing a high-density of nanoscale holes show a dramatic reduction in the in-plane thermal conductivity^{13, 21,22,23}. These silicon structures contain a limited LOS path between adjacent holes in a given row in the direction of heat flow and a continuous LOS path between neighboring rows of holes in the direction of heat flow^{13, 21, 24}. The contribution of the limited LOS path to thermal conductivity is not clearly understood, which makes it difficult to determine the impacts of the placement^{25,26,27}, separation^{13} and size^{28} of holes on thermal transport. While previous work has explored the impact of forward boundary scattering^{29}, the relevant physics is still elusive for phonons scattering off forward obstructions.

Here we demonstrate the impact of the limited LOS in silicon nanobeams that feature deliberately engineered forward obstructions along the direction of a net heat flow. We refer to these tortuous beams as labyrinths, which originates from the maze structure designed to hinder the escape of the mythological Minotaur. In nanostructured labyrinths, ballistic phonons are spatially confined by the boundaries. The baseline reference is a thin (thickness *t* = 80 nm) and narrow (width *w* = 470 nm) silicon beam that is 10 *µ*m long, and phonons can travel unimpeded along the major axis of the beam. We introduce obstructions along this beam axis by adding offset slits to disrupt the thermal transport path (see Fig. 1). The slits are cut into the beam from the edge to increase the phonon scattering rate and further limit the maximum phonon axial-travel length. This effectively eliminates any continuous LOS at the point when the adjacent slits overlap each other. We fabricate six different samples, including a reference silicon nanobeam without slits and five nanobeams with slits that vary in width *s* from 95 nm to 395 nm, as shown in Fig. 1(a–f).

### Experiments

The experimental structures are patterned between hot and cold platforms, and are suspended for thermal characterization as shown in Fig. 2. Heat is generated in one island and conducts through the sample and the supporting beams, and temperature is measured in each platform to measure the thermal conductance of the sample^{30, 31}. We extract the thermal conductivity of the samples by fitting the measured thermal conductance of the samples to the numerically calculated values using a finite element method (solved using COMSOL). The numerical simulation solves a three-dimensional heat equation that accounts for the volumetric change in thermal conductance between samples, assuming constant and homogeneous properties within the entire beams. We note that the finite element method thereby provides a reference, from the diffusive limit, for the impacts of geometry on transport, and the thermal conductivity allows us to examine departures from diffusive theory separately from geometry. All of the measurements are performed under vacuum to minimize convective heat losses from the beams, and the heat loss through radiation is considered negligible compared to the heat conduction through the samples at all temperatures in the study^{31}. The thermal interfacial resistances between the sample and the platforms are negligible since the devices are monolithically fabricated, which minimizes contact resistances^{13, 22, 32}. The uncertainty is primarily due to the measurement of the sample dimensions, and the uncertainty propagation is available in Supplementary Information.

## Results

For data interpretation, it is helpful to categorically divide the samples into two categories, those having a continuous LOS (Fig. 1(a–c)) and those with a blocked LOS (Fig. 1(d–f)). In the continuous LOS category, an open channel exists through the center of the major beam axis between heat source and heat sink. In the blocked LOS category, the maximum phonon travel distance is dictated by the forward spacing between the boundaries, where the maximum phonon travel distance is comparable to phonon MFPs, (*i*.*e*. partially ballistic transport). The heat flux maps are obtained by solving the Boltzmann transport equation and clearly show the different LOS channels as seen Fig. 1(h–m). We also define the coordinate system in Fig. 1(g), where the *x*- and *y*-axes are defined with respect to the axial direction of the beam.

As slit width *s* increases, the phonon transport reduction mechanism changes from a constricted but continuous LOS to a forcibly tortuous heat flow and fully blocked LOS. The measured thermal conductivity of the samples decreases monotonically from ~47 W m^{−1} K^{−1} to ~31 W m^{−1} K^{−1} with increasing *s* as shown in Fig. 3. The model prediction described below shows a sharp change in thermal conductivity at transition from continuous LOS along the entire beam to blocked LOS by geometry (*i*.*e*., *s* = 235 nm). A combination of experimental results and the modeling prediction indicates that phonon suppression mechanisms between the continuous and blocked LOS categories are dissimilar. In the continuous LOS samples, the central open channel through the beams is the primary heat transport path as seen in Fig. 1(h–j). With decreasing width of the LOS, heat flux through the LOS channel is continuously reduced, and phonon traveling in *x*-direction is locally induced. Possible phonon trajectories can be grouped into two cases: phonons propagating through the central LOS and phonons experiencing additional boundary scattering between adjacent slits in *y*-axis. A fraction of these two cases is controlled with the slit width *s*, and this modulation results in monotonically reduced thermal conductivity with increasing *s*. In the blocked LOS samples, the LOS is limited by geometry, and the tortuous thermal path forces heat flow to change direction between *x*- and *y*-axis. The change of heat flow along the thermal path is shown in Fig. 1(k–m). In this regime, phonon propagation experience additional scattering from boundaries normal to the direction of predominant heat flow. The reduction in thermal transport is due to both spatially confined cross-section and the limited longitudinal dimension along dominant heat flow. The samples in the blocked LOS can be considered as a series of alternating thermal resistors, ones aligned in *x* direction and the other aligned in *y* direction. With decreasing slit width *s*, the cross-section of the resistors aligned with in *y*-axis is continuously reduced, and this transverse constriction further suppresses thermal conductivity in the blocked LOS. Also, each resistor has a limited LOS in a direction of heat flow, and this limited length scale impacts on phonon propagation through the beam.

We investigate the impact of limited LOS in a direction of the dominant heat flow by comparing the tortuous beam with *s* = 395 nm and a straight beam with an equivalent cross-section and length. The tortuous beam with *s* = 395 nm has a cross-sectional area of 75 nm × 80 nm cross-sectional area throughout the samples. The thermal conductivity for the straight beam with a cross-section of 75 nm × 80 nm is predicted to be 37.6 W m^{−1} K^{−1} using the model as described below. The tortuous beam with *s* = 395 nm are estimated to be 33.1 W m^{−1} K^{−1} and ~31 W m^{−1} K^{−1} from a model prediction and experiments results, respectively. Both estimations show ~14% and ~18%, respectively, smaller conductivity values than the prediction for the straight beam despite sharing the same cross-sectional area. This discrepancy of the thermal conductivity between these two geometries isolates the contribution from the limited LOS. Compared to the straight beam with *w* = 75 nm, the tortuous beam with *s* = 395 nm has 130 additional scattering corner sites. Following diffuse scattering from the boundary within the structures, these phonons scatter in the opposite direction of the dominant heat flow, resulting in a reduction of MFP^{22}.

## Discussion

We model thermal transport in the nanostructured samples by solving the steady-state, phonon Boltzmann transport equation under the relaxation time approximation^{33}. The thermal conductivity is described using a combination of bulk MFPs and the suppression function as given by^{34}

where *f* is the differential MFP distributions for bulk silicon, *S*
_{Λ} is the directional phonon suppression function, Ω is a solid angle, and Λ is an integration variable for MFP of bulk silicon. The suppression function *S*
_{Λ}(Λ, Ω) describes the suppression of heat carried by phonons with MFP Λ and direction Ω with respect to Fourier’s law prediction^{24}. The directional suppression function is computed by the Boltzmann transport equation as described in Method section. The calculation in the present work uses MFPs for a bulk medium as input, where the bulk MFP spectra is obtained from *ab initio* calculations^{35}. The calculation of the Boltzmann transport equation predicts thermal conductivity with varying *s*, and the prediction agrees with experimental results to within ~8%. This indicates that phonon suppression mechanisms are captured by the calculation of the Boltzmann transport equation, validating the use of diffuse scattering boundary conditions at room temperature^{36}.

Based on the calculation of Boltzmann transport equation, we calculate the accumulated thermal conductivity with bulk MFPs to obtain a MFP-specific understanding of boundary scattering as a function of characteristic length scales. We compare three different cases: a thin film with thickness *t* = 80 nm, a straight beam with *t* = 80 nm and width *w* = 75 nm, and a tortuous beam with *t* = 80 nm, *w* = 75 nm, and *s* = 395 nm as shown in Fig. 4(a). The comparison among these cases shows the individual impact of respective dimensions: thickness *t*, width *w*, and the LOS. The accumulated thermal conductivity is

where Λ_{
bulk
} is phonon MFPs of bulk silicon. The function for thin film is calculated from the aforementioned model with a periodic boundary condition along *x*-axis. The accumulation functions show the impact of limiting dimensions, thickness *t*, width *w*, and the limited LOS in the dominant heat flow direction. The accumulation functions are reduced from bulk to the thin film, from the thin film to the straight beam, from the straight beam to the tortuous beam with *s* = 395 nm, and these corresponds to the impact of thickness, width, and the length of LOS, respectively. The accumulation functions for the thin film and the beam start to deviate from those for the bulk and the thin film, respectively, near *t*/3 = ~25 nm. The accumulation function for the sample with *s* = 395 nm shows suppression from a third longitudinal length, ~ 75 nm. The accumulation clearly shows the transition regime where boundary scattering becomes significant, and it is found that the limited LOS contributes to the reduction in thermal conductivity by suppressing long MFPs phonons.

To further investigate the impact of limited LOS, we use the directional suppression function, which provides angular information of suppressed heat flux for a given geometry. Since the samples are planar structures, we plot the directional suppression function on *x*-*y* plane, and the suppression function is defined as,

where the function is integrated over the azimuthal angle *θ*. We note that a conventional suppression function S_{Λ} is proportional to only the magnitude of heat flow, and the integration of S_{Λ}(Λ, *ϕ*) over *ϕ* provides the ratio of the MFP dependent heat flow to the counterpart of the bulk. The directional suppression function S_{Λ} is comprised of two symmetric lobes pointing toward +y and −y directions, and S_{Λ} vanhishes along the *x*-axis since there is no net heat flux for *ϕ* = 0 and 180 degrees. The suppression functions are compared at MFP = ~9 nm, ~100 nm, and ~900 nm, as shown in Fig. 4(b–d). The MFPs are chosen to represent three cases, internal scattering process dominant region (diffusive regime), the transition from internal scattering to boundary scattering (quasi-ballistic regime), and boundary scattering dominant region (nearly ballistic regime). While the suppression functions for the case of MFP = ~9 nm are overlapped among all the geometries due to the relative dominance of internal scattering, the suppression functions for MFP = ~900 nm clearly shows the impact of each dimension. The suppression function is normalized with the case of thin films to show the individual impact of each limiting dimension. For the cases of MFP ~100 nm and ~900 nm, the lobe for the straight beam is narrowed in compared to that of thin films, and this change indicates the impact of the limited width, *w* = 75 nm. The longitudinal heat flow of the tortuous beam with *s* = 395 nm is further suppressed relative to the straight beams due to forward boundaries, and this impact is displayed in reduction of heat flux along *y*-axis for MFP ~100 nm and ~900 nm. The suppression function analysis suggests that the impact of limited LOS becomes relevant when the distance that phonons travel is comparable to the MFP. With diffuse boundary scattering, this length scale can be considered as a limiting dimension, such as the diameter of a nanowire. These findings suggest that controlling the longitudinal dimension along heat flow can manipulate phonon propagation, and the relative contribution of limited LOS to thermal conductivity is important because it reduces the length of longitudinal free path.

### Summary

The combination of experiments and the Boltzmann transport equation calculations provides a quantitative description of the impact of conduction blocking the LOS channels along the direction of dominant heat flow. Tortuous thermal paths suppress the effective phonon MFP due to longitudinal features, and the suppression in heat flux is stronger than that from the cross-sectional confinement alone. This provides guidance to the design of nanostructures that achieve a lower limit to thermal conductivity. The suppression of phonon propagation using this limited LOS approach can be useful for thermoelectric applications. While previous studies of nanostructured thermoelectric materials show reduced thermal conductivity by increasing scattering events, such spatial confinement also causes simultaneous reduction of electrical conductivity, which degrades the figure or merit in applications such as thermoelectrics^{14, 21, 37}. Engineering thermal paths enables manipulation of energy carriers by suppressing phonon thermal conductivity more efficiently with constant cross-sectional area, which aids in decoupling phonons and electrons into ballistic and diffusive regimes, respectively. This work improves the understanding of phonon conduction in modern devices where both ballistic and diffusive phonon transports are present since the length scales of all three spatial dimensions are comparable to the phonon MFP, such as in fin field effect transistors (FinFETs).

## Methods

### Sample Fabrication

We fabricate silicon nanobeams on silicon-on-insulator (SOI) wafers (Soitec Inc.) comprised of 340 nm-thick silicon device layer and a 1 *µ*m-thick buried oxide (BOX) layer and patterned using electron beam lithography. First, the device layer is thinned down to ~80 nm via thermal oxidation and subsequent removal of the oxide using buffered oxide etchant (BOE). The reduced thickness of a device layer is measured using an optical ellipsometer and confirmed using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) imaging. We deposit ~25 nm-thick Al_{2}O_{3} using an atomic layer deposition (ALD) for electrical passivation between the metal contacts and the device layer, and the 10 *µ*m by 20 *µ*m sample region window between the two islands is opened by etching Al_{2}O_{3} using a combination of reactive ion etching (RIE) and wet etching using BOE. We pattern the nanobeams and slits using electron beam lithography, and RIE is used to remove the silicon to form the slits. The metal heater lines on the islands and the contact pads for electrical access are patterned using a combination of electron beam- and photo-lithography, and a lift-off process is followed after deposition of ~5 nm-thick Cr and ~40 nm-thick Pt using electron beam metal evaporation. The surrounding area of the islands and legs are etched using RIE, and they are suspended using gaseous hydrogen fluoride (HF) etching. All dimensions are measured using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after fabrication and TEM is used to measure the thickness of silicon beam.

### Boltzmann Transport Equation Calculation

The computational domain is a unit-cell of a beam as shown in Fig. 1(g), and the unit cell is a beam of width *w* = 470 nm, length *l*
_{unitcell} = 300 nm and thickness *t* = 80 nm. We solve the Boltzmann transport equation (BTE) with varying s from 0 to 395 nm as denoted in Fig. 1(a–f). Periodic boundary conditions are applied on the boundaries along the y-axis with a temperature difference of Δ*T* = 1 K, and diffuse boundary scattering is assumed for the other boundaries. The BTE solver uses the MFP spectra as only input^{38}, which is computed by *ab initio* calculations^{35}. The BTE is solved in space by the finite-volume method^{39} while the angular space is discretized by means of the discrete ordinate method. Specifically, we achieve convergence in the thermal conductivity when the BTE is solved for 100 MFPs, 96 polar angles (defined on the x-y plane) and 24 azimuthal angles. For the MFPs smaller than ~2 nm, we employ a diffusive equation, which enables accurate simulations and seamless integration with the BTE with a reasonable spatial discretization.

## Additional information

**Publisher's note:** Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## References

- 1.
Gur, I., Sawyer, K. & Prasher, R. Searching for a better thermal battery.

*Science***335**, 1454–1455 (2012). - 2.
Ji, H.

*et al*. Enhanced thermal conductivity of phase change materials with ultrathin-graphite foams for thermal energy storage.*Energy Environ Sci.***7**, 1185–1192 (2014). - 3.
Kucharski, T. J.

*et al*. Templated assembly of photoswitches significantly increases the energy-storage capacity of solar thermal fuels.*Nat. Chem.***6**, 441–447 (2014). - 4.
Challener, W.

*et al*. Heat-assisted magnetic recording by a near-field transducer with efficient optical energy transfer.*Nat. Photon.***3**, 220–224 (2009). - 5.
Wong, H. P.

*et al*. Phase change memory.*Proc. IEEE***98**, 2201–2227 (2010). - 6.
Yang, H.-H. & Rebeiz, G. M. Sub-10 pW/Hz0. 5 room temperature Ni nano-bolometer.

*Appl. Phys. Lett.***108**, 053106 (2016). - 7.
Han, Q.

*et al*. Highly sensitive hot electron bolometer based on disordered graphene.*Sci*.*Rep*.**3**(2013). - 8.
Bell, L. E. Cooling, heating, generating power, and recovering waste heat with thermoelectric systems.

*Science***321**, 1457–1461 (2008). - 9.
Chowdhury, I.

*et al*. On-chip cooling by superlattice-based thin-film thermoelectrics.*Nat. Nanotechnol.***4**, 235–238 (2009). - 10.
Cahill, D. G.

*et al*. Nanoscale thermal transport. II. 2003–2012.*Appl. Phys. Rev.***1**, 011305 (2014). - 11.
Li, D.

*et al*. Thermal conductivity of individual silicon nanowires.*Appl. Phys. Lett.***83**, 2934–2936 (2003). - 12.
Asheghi, M., Touzelbaev, M., Goodson, K., Leung, Y. & Wong, S. Temperature-dependent thermal conductivity of single-crystal silicon layers in SOI substrates.

*J. Heat Transfer***120**, 30–36 (1998). - 13.
Lim, J.

*et al*. Simultaneous Thermoelectric Property Measurement and Incoherent Phonon Transport in Holey Silicon.*ACS Nano***10**, 124 (2016). - 14.
Hochbaum, A. I.

*et al*. Enhanced thermoelectric performance of rough silicon nanowires.*Nature***451**, 163–167 (2008). - 15.
Liu, W. & Asheghi, M. Phonon–boundary scattering in ultrathin single-crystal silicon layers.

*Appl. Phys. Lett.***84**, 3819 (2004). - 16.
Sood, A.

*et al*. Thermal conduction in lattice–matched superlattices of InGaAs/InAlAs.*Appl. Phys. Lett.***105**, 51909–51913 (2014). - 17.
Chen, G. Thermal conductivity and ballistic-phonon transport in the cross-plane direction of superlattices.

*Phys. Rev. B***57**, 14958 (1998). - 18.
Luckyanova, M. N.

*et al*. Coherent phonon heat conduction in superlattices.*Science***338**, 936–939 (2012). - 19.
Ravichandran, J.

*et al*. Crossover from incoherent to coherent phonon scattering in epitaxial oxide superlattices.*Nat. Mater.***13**, 168–172 (2014). - 20.
Lee, J., Lim, J. & Yang, P. Ballistic Phonon Transport in Holey Silicon.

*Nano Lett*. (2015). - 21.
Tang, J.

*et al*. Holey silicon as an efficient thermoelectric material.*Nano Lett.***10**, 4279–4283 (2010). - 22.
Lee, J.

*et al*. Investigation of phonon coherence and backscattering using silicon nanomeshes.*Nat. Commun.***8**, 14054 (2017). - 23.
Yu, J.-K., Mitrovic, S., Tham, D., Varghese, J. & Heath, J. R. Reduction of thermal conductivity in phononic nanomesh structures.

*Nat. Nanotechnol.***5**, 718–721 (2010). - 24.
Romano, G. & Grossman, J. C. Toward phonon-boundary engineering in nanoporous materials.

*Appl. Phys. Lett.***105**, 033116 (2014). - 25.
Nakagawa, J., Kage, Y., Hori, T., Shiomi, J. & Nomura, M. Crystal structure dependent thermal conductivity in two-dimensional phononic crystal nanostructures.

*Appl. Phys. Lett.***107**, 023104 (2015). - 26.
Anufriev, R., Maire, J. & Nomura, M. Reduction of thermal conductivity by surface scattering of phonons in periodic silicon nanostructures.

*Phys. Rev. B***93**, 045411 (2016). - 27.
Song, D. & Chen, G. Thermal conductivity of periodic microporous silicon films.

*Appl. Phys. Lett.***84**, 687–689 (2004). - 28.
Alaie, S.

*et al*. Thermal transport in phononic crystals and the observation of coherent phonon scattering at room temperature.*Nat*.*Commun*.**6**(2015). - 29.
Heron, J.-S., Bera, C., Fournier, T., Mingo, N. & Bourgeois, O. Blocking phonons via nanoscale geometrical design.

*Phys. Rev. B***82**, 155458 (2010). - 30.
Kim, P., Shi, L., Majumdar, A. & McEuen, P. L. Thermal Transport Measurements of Individual Multiwalled Nanotubes.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***87**, 215502 (2001). - 31.
Shi, L.

*et al*. Measuring thermal and thermoelectric properties of one-dimensional nanostructures using a microfabricated device.*J. Heat Transfer***125**, 881–888 (2003). - 32.
Hippalgaonkar, K.

*et al*. Fabrication of Microdevices with Integrated Nanowires for Investigating Low-Dimensional Phonon Transport.*Nano Lett.***10**, 4341–4348 (2010). - 33.
Joshi, A. & Majumdar, A. Transient ballistic and diffusive phonon heat transport in thin films.

*J. Appl. Phys.***74**, 31–39 (1993). - 34.
Minnich, A. J. Determining Phonon Mean Free Paths from Observations of Quasiballistic Thermal Transport.

*Phys. Rev. Lett.***109**, 205901 (2012). - 35.
Esfarjani, K., Chen, G. & Stokes, H. T. Heat transport in silicon from first-principles calculations.

*Phys. Rev. B***84**, 085204 (2011). - 36.
Vega-Flick, A.

*et al*. Thermal transport in suspended silicon membranes measured by laser-induced transient gratings.*AIP Adv.***6**, 121903 (2016). - 37.
Boukai, A. I.

*et al*. Silicon nanowires as efficient thermoelectric materials.*Nature***451**, 168–171 (2008). - 38.
Romano, G. & Grossman, J. C. Heat Conduction in Nanostructured Materials Predicted by Phonon Bulk Mean Free Path Distribution.

*J. Heat Transfer***137**, 071302 (2015). - 39.
Romano, G., Esfarjani, K., Strubbe, D. A., Broido, D. & Kolpak, A. M. Temperature-dependent thermal conductivity in silicon nanostructured materials studied by the Boltzmann transport equation.

*Phys. Rev. B***93**, 035408 (2016).

## Acknowledgements

The authors thank Keivan Esfarjani for sharing the MFP spectra, Aditya Sood for useful discussion, and Eric Pop for critical readings for the manuscript. This work is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant No. 1336734. Work at MIT was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences (BES), Materials Sciences and Engineering Division under Award DE-SC0001299/DE-FG02-09ER46577. Sample preparation and characterization were performed at the Stanford Nano Shared Facilities (SNSF), supported by the National Science Foundation under award ECCS-1542152. M.T. B. appreciates support from the United States Department of Defense, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (NDSEG) Fellowship, 32 CFR 168a.

## Author information

### Affiliations

#### Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

- Woosung Park
- , Takashi Kodama
- , Michael T. Barako
- , Jungwan Cho
- , Mehdi Asheghi
- & Kenneth E. Goodson

#### Department of Mechanical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA

- Giuseppe Romano
- & Alexie M. Kolpak

#### Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

- Ethan C. Ahn
- & Joon Sohn

#### Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, 78249, USA

- Ethan C. Ahn

#### Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

- Joonsuk Park

#### Geballe Laboratory for Advanced Materials, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA

- Soo Jin Kim

#### Department of Mechanical Engineering, Kyung Hee University, Yongin-si, 446-701, South Korea

- Jungwan Cho

#### School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47907, USA

- Amy M. Marconnet

### Authors

### Search for Woosung Park in:

### Search for Giuseppe Romano in:

### Search for Ethan C. Ahn in:

### Search for Takashi Kodama in:

### Search for Joonsuk Park in:

### Search for Michael T. Barako in:

### Search for Joon Sohn in:

### Search for Soo Jin Kim in:

### Search for Jungwan Cho in:

### Search for Amy M. Marconnet in:

### Search for Mehdi Asheghi in:

### Search for Alexie M. Kolpak in:

### Search for Kenneth E. Goodson in:

### Contributions

W.P., A.M.M., and K.E.G. conceived the ideas for the project. W.P. designed and fabricated the experimental devices with help of E.C.A., T.K., J.S., and S.K. W.P. performed the thermal conductivity measurements. G.R. performed Boltzmann transport model calculations under supervision of A.M.K., W.P. and J.P. took scanning electron microscope. W.P. and M.T.B. wrote the main manuscript text. J.C., A.M.M., M.A., and K.E.G. commented on the manuscript. M.A. and K.E.G. guided the projects.

### Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenneth E. Goodson.

## Electronic supplementary material

## Rights and permissions

**Open Access** This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

## About this article

## Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.