Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Impacts of Early Life Stress on the Methylome and Transcriptome of Atlantic Salmon


Exposure to environmental stressors during early-life stages can change the rate and timing of various developmental processes. Epigenetic marks affecting transcriptional regulation can be altered by such environmental stimuli. To assess how stress might affect the methylome and transcriptome in salmon, fish were treated using cold-shock and air-exposure from the eye-stage until start-feeding. The fish were either stressed prior to hatching (E), post-hatching (PH), pre- and post-hatching (EPH) or not stressed (CO). Assessing transcriptional abundances just prior to start feeding, E and PH individuals were found to have modified the expression of thousands of genes, many with important functions in developmental processes. The EPH individuals however, showed expression similar to those of CO, suggesting an adaptive response to extended periods of stress. The methylome of stressed individuals differed from that of the CO, suggesting the importance of environment in shaping methylation signatures. Through integration of methylation with transcription, we identified bases with potential regulatory functions, some 10s of kb away from the targeted genes. We then followed fish growth for an additional year. Individuals in EPH showed superior growth compared to other treatment groups, highlighting how stress can potentially have long-lasting effects on an organism’s ability to adapt to environmental perturbations.


In the face of a growing human population and changing environment, understanding the molecular basis of phenotypic differences between individuals is a fundamental requirement to ensure a robust and sustainable production of our farmed plants and animals. Over the past few decades, we have constantly optimized and improved methods for implementing efficient breeding programs, genotyping strategies and identifying variations associated with traits of interest. In recent years however, there also has been a growing appreciation for the importance of environmental factors and epigenetic mechanisms in regulating the expression of genes and contributing to phenotypic diversity1, 2. Based on the findings from human studies as well as a few model organisms, it is known that at least some environmental exposures, particularly those that are encountered during early life stages, can trigger developmental trajectories with lifetime impacts on the health, metabolism or behaviour of the animal3. Recent advances in genomics technologies, along with the availability of the reference genomes for many species of economic importance, now allow us to investigate the epigenetic mechanisms behind gene-by-environment interactions, with detailed precision at the molecular level across a broad range of organisms. For the production and management of farmed species, such knowledge will become increasingly more important, as it will provide a basis for utilizing environmental stimuli as a means to modulate the level of gene expression and subsequently influence the animal or plant’s physiology.

Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), a member of the Salmonidae family, is a species of great social, cultural, environmental, evolutionary and economic importance with one of the highest market prices among all cultured fish4. As salmon aquaculture expands and becomes more resource intensive and industrialized, it needs to improve production efficiency without compromising animal welfare. Perhaps one of the most critical phases in Atlantic salmon farming is during the initial stages where the fish are transferred from freshwater to seawater5. Of the estimated 13–16% loss of total biomass during the seawater production cycle, the majority of mortalities and disease outbreaks occur in the first few months after seawater transfer5,6,7. These losses have mainly been attributed to multi-layers of stressors, including capturing, loading, transport, unloading and stocking. It has been suggested that such stressors can trigger a chain of molecular responses8, 9, which in return may supress the immune system10, seawater tolerance11, growth and/or survival of the fish12, 13. A recent report has traced back a large proportion of the seawater mortalities to certain hatcheries and suppliers, indicating that differences in hatchery practices may have significantly contributed to the physiological suitability of a fish to the challenges associated with the seawater transfer7.

DNA methylation at the CpG dinucleotides is one of the key epigenetic mechanisms that controls transcriptional expression and gene regulation14. It is well known that some environmental stimuli, particularly those encountered during early development, can trigger and contribute to variations in the methylation marks and patterns of gene expression3, 15. Such stimuli can potentially be used for conditioning fish to better cope with the various challenges that an animal faces in aquaculture settings. In this study, we aimed to investigate how different stress scenarios of cold shock and air exposure during early life stages in Atlantic salmon can influence the methylome landscape of the species and what are the subsequent impacts on the genome-wide regulation of gene expression. The stress treatments were adopted from a previous study in rainbow trout16 where it was shown that stress exposure during early development can reduce sensitivity to stress later in the juvenile fish. These types of stresses are relevant to the industry, as fish frequently encounter air exposure and experience changes in temperature during netting, sorting, treatments to remove ectoparasites and transportation (e.g., from 8 °C to 0 °C). We assessed and compared the growth performance of the fish from different stressed groups, up to 16 months of age, five weeks after the fish were transferred to the seawater. Using massively-parallel sequencing of mRNA and DNA, we found genomic sites from different stress groups to have vastly altered their methylation signatures compared to those of the unstressed individuals. Through integration of methylation data with gene expression information and comparative assessment of the omics profiles across different groups, we identified putatively important regulatory sites, that apparently play key roles in controlling the level of transcript expression. While we identified thousands of genes that had significantly modified their expression magnitude in response to stress, animals that had received stress treatment over more extended periods of time showed an unexpected convergence of their gene expression patterns to those of the unstressed individuals, an evidence suggestive of the animal’s adaptive response to stress. Interestingly these fish also showed a superior growth performance compared to the fish from other treatment groups. We suggest that this improved performance might be due to the biological concept of “hormesis”, the findings that low or moderate exposure to otherwise harmful stimuli can protect or improve one’s tolerance to the same (or other) stimuli/stressor during later stages of life17.

Results and Discussion

Methodology overview

Following fertilization, embryos from a full-sib family were divided into four triplicate groups of i. unstressed control (CO), ii. stressed during embryogenesis (E), iii. stressed during post-hatch (PH), and iv. stressed during both embryonic and post-hatch stages (EPH). The stress treatment was in the form of a cold-shock (drop from 7 °C to 0.2 °C for 1 min) that was followed by air exposure (15 °C) for 1 min before the fish were transferred back to a 7 °C water. Just prior to the start feeding (880 d°), 6 individuals per group were randomly selected and genomic DNA and total RNA were extracted from the same individuals (whole fry) for further analyses using RNA and Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing (RRBS; Methyl-MiniSeq) on an Illumia platform.

The genomic and transcriptomic short read sequences were mapped to the Atlantic salmon assembly ICSASG_v2. The gene expression profiles were assessed using the Tuxedo pipeline18 and the methylation patterns were investigated using Bismark19 along with the R package, methylKit20. After start feeding, the stress treatments were ceased and all groups were maintained under standard hatchery conditions in freshwater until smoltification. The fish were then transferred to the seawater where a 35-day growth trial was undertaken. The trial ended almost one year after the last stress exposure. Detailed experimental descriptions can be found in the Materials and Methods.

Stress induced differences in transcriptome profiles

Due to the pseudo-tetraploid nature of the Atlantic salmon genome21, 22 and to obtain a more accurate overview of the gene expression profiles, transcriptomes were sequenced to a great depth. On average, 60 M reads per individual were obtained and 93% were successfully mapped to the Atlantic salmon genome (Supplementary Figure 1a,b). Transcripts corresponding to 40,159 genes were detected, of which 67% and 98% showed significant hits against the NCBI non-redundant protein (nr) and nucleotide (nt) databases respectively. The predicted proteins exhibit high diversity of functional properties, including immune response, lipid metabolism, methyltransferase activity and oxidoreductase activity (138, 102, 178 and 259 genes respectively, Supplementary Figure 2).

The principal component analysis (PCA) of the gene expression data along with the clustering of transcripts with fold-change differences in expression greater than 1.5, further showed variations in gene expression among individuals within the E and PH treatment groups (Fig. 1 and Supplementary Figures 3a and 4). In particular, two individuals within each group, had expressions partly similar to the CO individuals and partly similar to the rest of the individuals in the E and PH groups. It is possible that many of the genes in these individuals have started to revert to the expression levels found under the “pre-stress” conditions. The underlying causes of such variation can be due to different biological or environmental factors including genotype, G × E interactions, epistasis, gender, potential differences in developmental stage and heterogeneity of the experimental setup. Such differences are an inherent part of many complex biological systems and reflect the plasticity of gene regulation and expression in response to environmental stimuli.

Figure 1

Heatmap of the standardized FPKM gene expression, showing relative levels of abundance of transcripts across the control (CO), embryonic (E), post-hatch (PH) and embryonic and post-hatch (EPH) treatment individuals for genes with greater than 1.5 fold-change difference in expression.

Comparison of transcript abundances for individuals who received stress during E or PH stages to those of the unstressed individuals showed that 1,776 and 2,700 genes were differentially expressed in the E and the PH experimental groups respectively (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figure 4). Most of the differentially expressed genes showed higher levels of expression among the stressed individuals. For the E group comparison, 1,534 genes had higher transcript abundances while only 242 had lower expression. For the PH group, the numbers of biased genes with higher or lower transcript abundances were 2,206 and 494, respectively. The genes with highest fold-change differences in both stress comparisons included: i. Thymidine phosphorylase, a gene that plays a key role in angiogenesis and is usually strongly up-regulated in tumour cells23; ii. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) receptor type II, with important functions in signal transduction, affecting cell proliferation and differentiation24 and is associated with the development of various types of tumours25; iii. Mucin-12-like product, a member of the mucin gene family which is involved in epithelial cell protection, signalling and growth regulation26 and found to be differentially expressed in various cancers and other diseases e.g., refs 27,28,29,30; and iv. Apolipoprotein B mRNA editing enzyme, a C to U editing enzyme which plays a role in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression through DNA demethylation31 (Supplementary Figure 5).

Figure 2

Volcano plots, showing genes with biased patterns of expression between individuals in the control group (CO) and the fish stressed during embryonic (E), post-hatch (PH) and embryonic and post-hatch (EPH) stages. Red dots represent genes with significantly lower abundances while the blue dots show genes with higher levels of expression. Values on the x- and the y-axes are log2 fold change (FC) differences in the gene expression and negative log10 of the corrected p values respectively.

Enrichment analysis of gene ontology (GO) terms found biological processes associated with cell movement and cellular organization to be among the top over-represented functional categories in both E and PH stressed individuals (Supplementary Figure 6a). These are necessary steps for processes such as embryonic morphogenesis, angiogenesis, immune system development, tissue repair and regeneration32,33,34,35, all mainly relying on the dynamics of actin assembly36 (Supplementary Figure 6a). Disturbance in the regulation and function of actin and other cytoskeletal components is one of the main underlying causes of a wide range of diseases and abnormalities, from cancer to muscle skeletal disorders34, 37, 38. Our data suggest that stress during early stages of salmon development can modify the transcription and regulation profiles of a number of genes that are involved in the proper functioning of these networks.

Enrichment analysis also detected under-representation of GO functional annotations associated with translation and protein synthesis (Supplementary Figure 6b). Many of the genes associated with this term act at the ribosomal and translation initiation levels, suggesting that stressed cells might be compensating for high expression levels of genes such as those that are involved in cell differentiation and proliferation, through curbing their translation. Significantly lower expression levels of genes involved in vision development and phototransduction, including several opsins and RPE-retinal G protein-coupled receptors (Supplementary Figure 6b), were also detected among the E and PH individuals compared to the unstressed individuals. Genes encoding opsins, determining sensitivity for red (two different gene copies) and green light, as well as duplicated copies of RPE-retinal G protein-coupled receptor, all showed reduction in their expression within these two stressed categories. Heat and cold stress have been shown to repress the transcriptional expression of genes involved in phototransduction in zebrafish39, 40. These findings highlight the likely involvement of environmental cues such as sub-optimal temperatures in the development of phototransduction and visual regulatory processes.

We also investigated the functional properties of the genes that were differentially expressed between the E and the PH stressed groups. In total, 714 genes were identified, with 406 and 308 genes having higher levels of expression in the E and the PH individuals respectively. Many of the genes having higher expression in the PH group had functions associated with the regulation of cell growth. Some of these genes included different members of the insulin-like growth factor binding protein family (IGFBP-1, IGFBP-6, IGFBP-1B2), implicated in modulating various bioactivities of the IGF system41 and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF), a protein important in different cellular activities, including angiogenesis and skeletogenesis42,43,44. Interestingly, within this stressed group of individuals, we also found up-regulation of different members of the growth arrest and DNA damage-inducible protein gene family (GADD45-alpha, -beta and -gamma). These proteins are suggested as “stress sensors”, all involved in growth suppression, cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis45,46,47. Lower levels of expression of different immune response components were also detected in the PH individuals, including various members of the chemokine (C-C motif) ligand, CCL4, CCL19, CCL20 and CCL28 all playing important roles in both innate and adaptive immunity48,49,50.

Unlike the E and PH stressed individuals, the transcriptional signatures of the EPH replicates showed very high resemblance to the gene expression patterns of the unstressed group (Figs 1 and 2 and Supplementary Figures 3a and 4). Only 108 genes were differentially expressed, with 69 having lower and 39 showing higher gene expression levels. Nonetheless, the overall profiles of the transcripts and the general direction of changes in the expression showed high consistency across all stressed groups (Supplementary Figure 7a,b). Among differentially expressed genes within EPH, and similar to the other stressed groups, the TGF-beta receptor type II showed the highest increase in expression with approximately 25-fold increase in the abundance of its transcripts (Supplementary Figure 5b). We also identified a unique expression signature for the metastasis suppressor protein 1-like gene (MTSS1), which was only expressed in the EPH treatment group. MTSS1 is known for its ability to suppress cell metastasis and provide a means to regulate cell proliferation, and also acts as a cytoskeletal scaffold to regulate actin dynamics51. This is consistent with the results from functional enrichment assessment obtained from the E and PH treatment fish, in that temperature and possibly some other environmental stressors can modify the regulation of cell proliferation and the process of actin assembly52. The increased transcription of MTSS1 could also function to mitigate the significantly reduced expression of two different MHC class I genes, as observed among the EPH individuals. It is now well established that the down-regulation of MHC class I genes is tightly associate to cell metastasis, as this process can greatly facilitate the concealment of the tumour cells from T cell-mediated immune response53, 54.

Despite these differentially expressed genes, the overall genome-wide profiles of transcription between EPH and CO individuals seem to have converged to a great extent (Figs 1 and 2 and Supplementary Figures 3a and 4). Our data provide support that a wide range of transcriptomic reactions can be triggered during the initial phases of stress. However, over time, individuals will become more adapted and can cope more efficiently with such environmental stimuli. Within the EPH group, the transcriptomic signatures of such an adaptation are reflected in the expression patterns of thousands of genes that have modified their transcription levels, making them comparable to the “pre-stress” state.

Based on our expressed sequence information, we also identified signatures of many duplicated genes and conserved blocks of syntenic paralogous regions between different chromosomes (Supplementary Figure 8). Using information from the uniquely aligned reads, we further investigated the profiles of gene duplicates where the expressions of both copies were significantly modified in response to stress. We found that in cases where the two paralogues have significantly changed their expression patterns compared to the control, the direction of the change in expression was the same between the two copies, such that both duplicates exhibited either higher or lower abundances in transcriptional levels (Supplementary Figure 9). Some genes of interest, such as actin muscle, collagen alpha 1, heat shock protein beta 1, lipopolysaccharide-induced tumour necrosis factor-alpha, hemoglobin embryonic subunit alpha, nephronectin and different members of the myosin family also showed consistently higher expression of their two paralogues in both E and the PH groups (Supplementary Figure 10). However, further research is needed to determine whether the parallel changes in expression for these paralogues is due to the conserved regulatory control of the same genetic mechanisms or whether different regulatory elements have responded to stress in a convergent manner.

Stress induced differences in methylome profiles

We next investigated the genome-wide impacts of stress on the methylome signatures across the different stressed groups. On average, about 34 million paired-end reads per individual were sequenced with RRBS and more than 80% of these reads were successfully mapped to the salmon genome (Supplementary Figure 1b). Analyses of the differentially methylated dinucleotides (DM), obtained through pairwise comparisons with the CO group, identified, on average, 16% more sites exhibiting hyper-methylation than hypo-methylation among the stressed individuals (Supplementary Figure 11). Altogether, we identified 3,137 hyper-methylated and 2,458 hypo-methylated regions across all groups. The percentage of the globally methylated Cs in the CpG context ranged from 77–80%, with the highest percentage of methylation observed among the EPH individuals (Supplementary Figure 12).

Similar to the findings in gene expression, we also identified a very high concordance in the directional changes of DM sites among stressed individuals relative to the CO group (Supplementary Figure 7c,d). These findings are important, as through the converged patterns of methylation data we can more confidently localise the genomic positions of CpG dinucleotides that have responded to the stress stimuli through the gain or loss of methyl groups. The majority of these DM loci are located within intergenic regions (49%), with fewer numbers in putative promoters (6%), 5′ UTR (4%), intronic (33%), exonic (5%) and 3′ UTR (3%) regions. Clustering of the DM loci in addition to the PCA plot also showed a clear pattern of genome-wide changes across methylation sites within different stressed groups compared to control individuals (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Figure 3b). Interestingly, there was a high concordance in the clustering profiles of the loci that were found to be DM in the E and the PH experimental groups (Fig. 3 and Supplementary Figure 3b), even though these individuals received stress during different ontological stages. On the other hand, the methylation heatmap of the EPH individuals is distinctly different to the E or PH groups. These findings suggest that, at least in our experiment, the duration, rather than the ontological stage at which an individual received stress, played a more critical role in determining the profile of the methylome. However, the generality of these findings needs further confirmation. Further, while by using the whole fry, we ensured that all tissues are included in the analyses, our data is limited in identifying tissue specific context in response to stress, for both expression and methylation.

Figure 3

Heatmap, showing the standardized methylation ratios of the DM CpG dinucleotides, identified between the control group (CO) with individuals in the stressed embryonic (E), post-hatch (PH) and embryonic and post-hatch (EPH) groups. Each horizontal line represents a distinct DM site.

We next examined the association between changes in DNA methylation with the abundance of transcription in a subset of genes that showed consistently higher or lower levels of expression (minimum 1.5 fold change difference in transcript abundances) across all stressed groups compared to the control. Among 108 biased genes investigated (and their 10 kb flanking regions), significant changes in the average methylation gain or loss was detected (Welch two sample t-test; p < 0.0001). Of these genes, 45% showed increased levels of methylation with significant reduction in their expression magnitude (Supplementary Figure 13a). These hyper-methylated genes included methyltransferase-like protein 25, actin alpha cardiac muscle l, actin beta, guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase, death-associated protein, tyrosine phosphatase type IVA2, tyrosine-phosphatase receptor type G, serine/threonine-phosphatase 2 A and pancreatic progenitor cell differentiation and proliferation, all playing an important role in cell cycle control and in the regulation of cell growth, proliferation and differentiation e.g., refs 55,56,57,58 (Supplementary Table 1). Suggestive evidence of hyper-methylated sites associated with increased transcript expression as well as hypo-methylated sites associated with either higher or lower levels of expression were also identified in 25%, 16% and 14% of the cases investigated respectively (Supplementary Figure 13b,c,d). These categories contained multiple members of particular gene families, further confirming the functional properties that might be the targets of regulation via methylation mechanisms. For instance, different members of methyltransferase, myosin, actin, collagen and protein phosphatase gene families showed different and mostly complementary patterns of regulation and methylation (Supplementary Table 1). Alternative transcriptional profiles among different members of the same gene family might indicate compensatory functional mechanisms between these genes.

To identify CpG sites with putatively important regulatory impact on gene transcription, we scanned sliding windows of 1 Mb genomic bins throughout the genome. We detected potentially key regulatory loci, some 10s to 100s of kb up- or down-stream of the differentially expressed genes. An example of one such genomic window, identified on chromosome 1, is presented in Fig. 4. As depicted in the figure, a number of genes including epidermal growth factor (EGF) domain and ectodermal-neural cortex 1 (ENC1) show significant differences in their expression profiles in the E and PH groups compared to the control group. Little evidence of any DM loci within this genomic block was found across both of these treatment groups. On the other hand, within the EPH individuals, while the expression of the majority of the genes identified in this region exhibit a similar pattern to those of the unstressed individuals, we also identified a number of CpG sites with significant increase in their levels of methylation. Taken together and comparing the transcription and methylation profiles across the three treatment groups, it can be speculated that the increased methylation in this region had functioned to re-adjust the level of transcription to the “pre-stress” state within the EPH individuals.

Figure 4

An example of a genomic bin on chromosome 1, showing suggestive association between differentially methylated sites with differentially expressed genes. The red and the blue bars show higher or lower levels of methylation relative to the control individuals in the stressed embryonic (E), post-hatch (PH) and embryonic and post-hatch (EPH) groups. The bars indicated by dark arrows are significantly hyper-methylated regions. The green peaks and valleys are log2 fold-change differences in gene expression. The red arrows show genes that have been regulated differently compared to the un-stressed individuals.

Comparative growth performance and evidence of stress-related benefits on growth

To assess the potential influence of stress on growth performance during early life stages, 30 individuals from each group were measured for their body weight just prior to the start feeding. No significant, adverse effect of stress was identified on the animal growth (data not shown). From the start feeding on, all fish were treated and raised under the same standard hatchery conditions and were monitored for their growth performance. Fish within the EPH group were found to be significantly larger by weight (~16%) (p < 0.033) and by length (~5%) (p < 0.003) than fish in the other stress treatment groups. The better growth performance was maintained during both freshwater and seawater stages (Fig. 5). Further, although not statistically significant, the EPH fish were also heavier (~6%) and longer (~3%) than the fish in the control group. This could suggest that the EPH fish were better able to handle subsequent stresses at later stages of life, and as a result, more efficiently allocated energy and metabolic resources towards improving their growth and development. These findings can best be explained by the phenomenon of hormesis, an adaptive response of a cell or an organism to low or moderate levels of stress, where after an initial disruption to homeostasis it can act to modify the production levels of beneficial and/or harmful gene products59. If this has been the case in the fish examined in this study, these effects have probably been maintained for at least one year after the stress treatments were ceased. Although currently little is known about the molecular basis of hormetic mechanisms17, the positive effects of mild, repeated stress have been documented in many species e.g., refs 60,61,62. For example, fruit flies subjected to a mild stress, such as cold, substantially increased the resistance to severe stresses like heat or fungal infections, and additionally, these effects seem to persist throughout the life of the animal63. In the light of these findings, our study provides insight into the gene products and genome-wide regulatory sites that are sensitive to methylation modifications and might be important for conferring better growth performance in the farmed Atlantic salmon.

Figure 5

Weight (g) (a and c) and length (cm) (b and d) of the fish in different treatment groups at the time of transfer to the seawater (day 0) (a and b) or 35 days after seawater transfer (35‰ salinity) (c and d). Different superscript letters indicate statistical significant differences (p < 0.05).

Materials and Methods

Sample collection and preparation

Batches of milt and unfertilized salmon eggs were obtained from a commercial supplier (AquaGen, Trondheim, Norway). Fertilized eggs and alevins prior to exogenous feeding are exempt from the Norwegian Regulation on Animal Experimentation, and thus approval of the experimental protocol for this experiment by the Norwegian Animal Research Authority (NARA) was not required. However, all experiments and trials were conducted in accordance with the laws and regulations controlling experiments and procedures in live animals in Norway (the Animal Welfare Act of December 20th 1974, No 73, chapter VI sections 20–22 and the Regulation on Animal Experimentation of January 15th 1996). Fertilization was performed according to standard procedures using milt in excess at the Nofima’s Aquaculture research station (Tromsø, Norway). Egg/embryo incubation was performed in upwelling incubators at a water temperature of 7 °C. Eggs from a full-sib family were divided into four groups: i. unstressed control (CO), ii. eggs stressed during embryogenesis (E), iii. fry stressed during post-hatch stages (PH), iv. embryos and post-hatch fry stressed during both during embryonic and post-hatch stages (EPH). Each treatment group was incubated in triplicate trays containing ca. 1800 eggs in each replicate. The different treatment groups were subjected to bouts of stress (exposure to cold water (0.2 °C) for 1 min, followed by air exposure (15 °C) for 1 min and then return to 7 °C water) either during embryogenesis (5 times from 250 to 450 day degrees, d°) or during the yolk-sac stages (3 times, from 540 to 800 d°), or both. The time point just prior to start feeding (880 d°) was chosen for further analyses using RNA and Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing (RRBS; Methyl-MiniSeq). Samples were secured by immersion in RNA-later (Ambion) according to the manufacturers protocol. Six individuals from each group were randomly chosen (total n = 24). Total RNA and genomic DNA were extracted from the same individuals (whole fry) using the AllPrep DNA/RNA/miRNA Universal Kit (Qiagen). Samples were shipped to the Zymo Research (San Diego, CA, USA) on dry ice and arrived in good condition as confirmed by Bioanalyzer (Agilent).

RNA sequencing, alignment and differential expression assessment

Preparation of the mRNA libraries and sequencing transcripts were performed by the Zymo Research (San Diego, CA, USA) using standard protocols ( Samples were sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq platform as single-end 50 bp reads. Following read quality assessment (, removing sequencing adapters and trimming low quality bases64, the remaining sequences were aligned to the salmon genome assembly ICSASG_v2 using TopHat (v.2.0.13)65. To obtain a more comprehensive view of the expressed genes and transcripts, we further included annotation information from previously processed RNA sequence data, from an additional 494 individuals, representing different populations, different developmental stages and obtained from tissues such as fillet muscle, heart muscle, liver and whole embryo (unpublished data). The aligned sequences where then fed to Cufflinks18, 66 to generate transcriptome assemblies for each sequenced sample and merged together by Cuffmerge to construct a uniform gene transfer file. Expression data were normalized via the median of the geometric means of fragment counts across all sample67. Cuffdiff was used to estimate the expression abundances of the assembled genes and transcripts and to test for differential levels of expression between all stressed groups. Considering the duplicated origin of the Atlantic salmon genome, differential expression assessments were preformed once using the information from only the uniquely aligned reads and once using all the mapped sequences. The results were almost identical between the two datasets, for both single and duplicated gene copies. Genes or transcripts with greater than 1.5-fold difference in expression and corrected p-values of less than 0.05 were assigned as differentially expressed.

RRBS sequencing (Methyl-MiniSeq), alignment and differential methylation assessment

Libraries were prepared from 200–500 ng of gDNA digested using 60 units of TaqαI and 30 units of MspI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) and then extracted with Zymo Research DNA Clean & Concentrator-5 kit (ZR). Fragments were ligated to pre-annealed adapters containing 5′-methyl-cytosine instead of cytosine according to the manufacturers guidelines (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Adaptor-ligated fragments of 150–250 bp and 250–350 bp in size were recovered from a 2.5% NuSieve 1:1 agarose gel (Zymoclean Gel DNA Recovery Kit, ZR). The fragments were then bisulfite-treated using the EZ DNA Methylation-Lightning Kit (ZR). Preparative-scale PCR was performed and the resulting products were purified (DNA Clean & Concentrator, ZR) and sequenced on an Illumina HiSeq genome analyzer as paired-end, 50 bp fragments.

Following the initial assessment of sequence quality using FastQC (, sequencing adapters and low quality bases were removed ( ref. 64 to allow only the highest quality sequences to be used in subsequent analyses. Bisulfite treated reads were then mapped to the Atlantic salmon reference assembly ICSASG_v2 using Bismark v0.12.319 with Bowtie168, 69. The methylation status of the CpG dinucleotides was extracted from the uniquely aligned reads using the Bismark methylation extractor module. The R package, methylKit20 was used to identify differentially methylated bases by implementing a logistic regression test. The p-values of the methylation tests were corrected for multiple testing (i.e., q-value) using a sliding linear model suitable for datasets with dependence structures70. A CpG site was assigned to have a differential methylation pattern when absolute methylation difference was greater than 20% and q-value less than 0.1. All raw sequences have been deposited to the NCBI Short Read Archive (SRA) under the BioProject ID PRJNA388534.

Gene annotation and enrichment assessment of Gene Ontology terms

Putative open reading frames were identified using TransDecoder71. Functional annotations of the Gene Ontology (GO) terms were assigned using Blast2GO72 against the SwissProt/TrEMBL and the NCBI nr databases and further mapped to more generic terms by GO-Slim ( Enrichment in GO terms for genes with biased pattern of expression between different groups were examined by the R package topGO73 and the significance level was assessed using Fisher’s exact test.

Identification of expressed, duplicated genomic regions

To identify duplicated genomic blocks, the longest transcript from each gene was extracted and used as a source to create a database of non-redundant, expressed sequences. Nucleotide blast search was then used as a mean to compare this database against itself using a cut-off e-value of 10−10. Duplicated genomic blocks were assigned between any two independent genomic regions if at least 10 neighboring genes with the second best reciprocal blast hit were identified between these blocks.

Associating methylation with gene expression

To investigate putative associations between transcript abundances with average changes in DNA methylation, a subset of genes with consistent patterns of differential expression among all stressed groups were selected (Supplemental Table 1). After excluding CpG dinucleotides with minimum average coverage of less than 6 reads per sample as well as sites with cut-off value of less than 8% difference in methylation gain or loss, the mean methylation of the gene body and the flanking 10 Kb up- and down-stream regions of the genes were calculated. Statistical differences in the average methylation changes were tested for all pairwise comparisons using Welch’s two samples t-test. Patterns of changes in methylation and gene expression were also investigated in 1 Mb sliding windows. In particular, genomic blocks containing differentially expressed genes were examined more closely to identify putatively regulatory sites that are sensitive to methylation modification.

Comparative assessment of growth performance

In order to evaluate any further influence of stress on long-term development (here growth rate), 880 d° fry from all treatment groups were moved to start feeding units and fed in duplicate tanks under standard hatchery conditions (continuous light and 8 °C water, gradually increasing to 10 °C over two weeks). All groups were maintained under these conditions (in fresh water) for about seven months until they were c. 45 g. Smoltification was induced using a standard hatchery protocol. Briefly, the fish was transferred from continuous light and 10 °C water temperature to a 6 week long “winter” period with short day length (8 h light/16 h darkness; 8 L:16D) and 6 °C, after which they were transferred to a “summer” period with continuous light and 10 °C. Smoltification was completed 6 weeks later. In mid-March 2014 all groups had developed full osmoregulatory capacity when exposed to seawater (35‰ salinity). Sub-populations of the different treatment groups were subjected to a seawater challenge test (exposure to full strength seawater (35‰ salinity) at 7 °C for 24 h). Normal plasma chloride concentration (c. 140 mM) and plasma osmolality (c. 340 mOsmol) after 24 h is indicative of full hypoosmoregulatory capacity. Fish from different treatment groups were transferred to seawater and a 35-day growth trail was undertaken. This growth trail ended almost exactly (within a couple of days) one year after the last stress exposure.


  1. 1.

    Feil, R. & Fraga, M. F. Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nat Rev Genet 13, 97–109 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Smith, Z. D. & Meissner, A. DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet 14, 204–220 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Szyf, M. DNA Methylation, Behavior and Early Life Adversity. Journal of Genetics and Genomics 40, 331–338, doi:10.1016/j.jgg.2013.06.004 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    FEAP. European Aquaculture Production Report 2005–2014 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Iversen, M. et al. Stress responses in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) smolts during commercial well boat transports, and effects on survival after transfer to sea. Aquaculture 243, 373–382, doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.10.019 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Directorate of Fisheries. Foreløpig statistikk for oppdrett 2001. 33 (Bergen, Norway 2002).

  7. 7.

    The Norwegian Seafood Research Fund. Tap av laks i sjø (2014).

  8. 8.

    Barton, B. A. Stress in Fishes: A Diversity of Responses with Particular Reference to Changes in Circulating Corticosteroids. Integrative and Comparative Biology 42, 517–525, doi:10.1093/icb/42.3.517 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Barton, B. A. & Iwama, G. K. Physiological changes in fish from stress in aquaculture with emphasis on the response and effects of corticosteroids. Annual Review of Fish Diseases 1, 3–26, doi:10.1016/0959-8030(91)90019-G (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Einarsdóttir, I. E., Nilssen, K. J. & Iversen, M. Effects of rearing stress on Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) antibody response to a non-pathogenic antigen. Aquaculture Research 31, 923–930 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Iversen, M., Finstad, B. & Nilssen, K. J. Recovery from loading and transport stress in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) smolts. Aquaculture 168, 387–394, doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(98)00364-0 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bernier, N. J. & Peter, R. E. The hypothalamic–pituitary–interrenal axis and the control of food intake in teleost fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 129, 639–644, doi:10.1016/S1096-4959(01)00360-8 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mommsen, T. P., Vijayan, M. M. & Moon, T. W. Cortisol in teleosts: dynamics, mechanisms of action, and metabolic regulation. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 9, 211–268, doi:10.1023/a:1008924418720 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ndlovu, M. N., Denis, H. & Fuks, F. Exposing the DNA methylome iceberg. Trends in biochemical sciences 36, 381–387, doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2011.03.002 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Jaenisch, R. & Bird, A. Epigenetic regulation of gene expression: how the genome integrates intrinsic and environmental signals. Nature genetics 33(Suppl), 245–254, doi:10.1038/ng1089 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Auperin, B. & Geslin, M. Plasma cortisol response to stress in juvenile rainbow trout is influenced by their life history during early development and by egg cortisol content. General and Comparative Endocrinology 158, 234–239, doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2008.07.002 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Vaiserman, A. M. H. Adaptive epigenetic reorganization, and implications for human health and longevity. Dose-response: a publication of International Hormesis Society 8, 16–21, doi:10.2203/dose-response.09-014.Vaiserman (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Trapnell, C. et al. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nature protocols 7, 562–578, doi:10.1038/nprot.2012.016 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Krueger, F. & Andrews, S. R. Bismark: a flexible aligner and methylation caller for Bisulfite-Seq applications. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 27, 1571–1572, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr167 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Akalin, A. et al. methylKit: a comprehensive R package for the analysis of genome-wide DNA methylation profiles. Genome biology 13, R87, doi:10.1186/gb-2012-13-10-r87 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Lien, S. et al. The Atlantic salmon genome provides insights into rediploidization. Nature 533, 200–205, doi:10.1038/nature17164 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Berthelot, C. et al. The rainbow trout genome provides novel insights into evolution after whole-genome duplication in vertebrates. Nat Commun 5, doi:10.1038/ncomms4657 (2014).

  23. 23.

    Griffiths, L. & Stratford, I. J. Platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor thymidine phosphorylase in tumour growth and response to therapy. British journal of cancer 76, 689–693 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Lin, H. Y., Wang, X. F., Ng-Eaton, E., Weinberg, R. A. & Lodish, H. F. Expression cloning of the TGF-beta type II receptor, a functional transmembrane serine/threonine kinase. Cell 68, 775–785 (1992).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Nadauld, L. D. et al. Metastatic tumor evolution and organoid modeling implicate TGFBR2 as a cancer driver in diffuse gastric cancer. Genome biology 15, 428, doi:10.1186/s13059-014-0428-9 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Chu, H. W. et al. Transforming growth factor-beta2 induces bronchial epithelial mucin expression in asthma. The American journal of pathology 165, 1097–1106 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Singh, A. P., Chaturvedi, P. & Batra, S. K. Emerging roles of MUC4 in cancer: a novel target for diagnosis and therapy. Cancer research 67, 433–436, doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-3114 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Singh, A. P. et al. Aberrant expression of transmembrane mucins, MUC1 and MUC4, in human prostate carcinomas. The Prostate 66, 421–429, doi:10.1002/pros.20372 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Singh, A. P., Moniaux, N., Chauhan, S. C., Meza, J. L. & Batra, S. K. Inhibition of MUC4 expression suppresses pancreatic tumor cell growth and metastasis. Cancer research 64, 622–630 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Williams, S. J. et al. Two novel mucin genes down-regulated in colorectal cancer identified by differential display. Cancer research 59, 4083–4089 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Prochnow, C., Bransteitter, R., Klein, M. G., Goodman, M. F. & Chen, X. S. The APOBEC-2 crystal structure and functional implications for the deaminase AID. Nature 445, 447–451, doi:10.1038/nature05492 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Hussey, P. J., Ketelaar, T. & Deeks, M. J. Control of the actin cytoskeleton in plant cell growth. Annual review of plant biology 57, 109–125, doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105206 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Itoh, T. & De Camilli, P. BAR, F-BAR (EFC) and ENTH/ANTH domains in the regulation of membrane-cytosol interfaces and membrane curvature. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1761, 897–912, doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.06.015 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Lee, S. H. & Dominguez, R. Regulation of actin cytoskeleton dynamics in cells. Molecules and cells 29, 311–325, doi:10.1007/s10059-010-0053-8 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Yamaguchi, H. & Condeelis, J. Regulation of the actin cytoskeleton in cancer cell migration and invasion. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1773, 642–652, doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.07.001 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bailly, M. & Condeelis, J. Cell motility: insights from the backstage. Nature cell biology 4, E292–294, doi:10.1038/ncb1202-e292 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Takle, H., Baeverfjord, G., Lunde, M., Kolstad, K. & Andersen, Ø. The effect of heat and cold exposure on HSP70 expression and development of deformities during embryogenesis of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Aquaculture 249, 515–524, doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.04.043 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Wargelius, A., Fjelldal, P. G. & Hansen, T. Heat shock during early somitogenesis induces caudal vertebral column defects in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Development genes and evolution 215, 350–357, doi:10.1007/s00427-005-0482-0 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Long, Y., Li, L., Li, Q., He, X. & Cui, Z. Transcriptomic characterization of temperature stress responses in larval zebrafish. PloS one 7, e37209, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037209 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Wang, Q., Tan, X., Jiao, S., You, F. & Zhang, P. J. Analyzing cold tolerance mechanism in transgenic zebrafish (Danio rerio). PloS one 9, e102492, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0102492 (2014).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Hwa, V., Oh, Y. & Rosenfeld, R. G. The insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP) superfamily. Endocrine reviews 20, 761–787, doi:10.1210/edrv.20.6.0382 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Abreu, J. G., Ketpura, N. I., Reversade, B. & De Robertis, E. M. Connective-tissue growth factor (CTGF) modulates cell signalling by BMP and TGF-beta. Nature cell biology 4, 599–604, doi:10.1038/ncb826 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Arnott, J. A. et al. The role of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF/CCN2) in skeletogenesis. Critical reviews in eukaryotic gene expression 21, 43–69 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Mendes, F. A. et al. Connective-Tissue Growth Factor (CTGF/CCN2) Induces Astrogenesis and Fibronectin Expression of Embryonic Neural Cells In Vitro. PloS one 10, e0133689, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0133689 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Liebermann, D. A. & Hoffman, B. Myeloid differentiation (MyD)/growth arrest DNA damage (GADD) genes in tumor suppression, immunity and inflammation. Leukemia 16, 527–541, doi:10.1038/sj.leu.2402477 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Smith, M. L. et al. Interaction of the p53-regulated protein Gadd45 with proliferating cell nuclear antigen. Science (New York, N.Y.) 266, 1376–1380 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Salvador, J. M., Brown-Clay, J. D. & Fornace, A. J. Jr. Gadd45 in stress signaling, cell cycle control, and apoptosis. Advances in experimental medicine and biology 793, 1–19, doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8289-5_1 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Mackay, C. R. Chemokines: immunology’s high impact factors. Nature immunology 2, 95–101, doi:10.1038/84298 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Luster, A. D. The role of chemokines in linking innate and adaptive immunity. Current opinion in immunology 14, 129–135 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Zhang, J. et al. Characterization of a novel CC chemokine CCL4 in immune response induced by nitrite and its expression differences among three populations of Megalobrama amblycephala. Fish & shellfish immunology 38, 88–95, doi:10.1016/j.fsi.2014.02.012 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Xie, F., Ye, L., Ta, M., Zhang, L. & Jiang, W. G. MTSS1: a multifunctional protein and its role in cancer invasion and metastasis. Frontiers in bioscience (Scholar edition) 3, 621–631 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    van der Kooij, M. A., Masana, M., Rust, M. B. & Müller, M. B. The stressed cytoskeleton: How actin dynamics can shape stress-related consequences on synaptic plasticity and complex behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 62, 69–75, doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.12.001 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Plopper, G. E., Huff, J. L., Rust, W. L., Schwartz, M. A. & Quaranta, V. Antibody-induced activation of beta1 integrin receptors stimulates cAMP-dependent migration of breast cells on laminin-5. Molecular cell biology research communications: MCBRC 4, 129–135, doi:10.1006/mcbr.2001.0267 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Champine, P. J., Michaelson, J., Weimer, B. C., Welch, D. R. & DeWald, D. B. Microarray analysis reveals potential mechanisms of BRMS1-mediated metastasis suppression. Clinical & experimental metastasis 24, 551–565, doi:10.1007/s10585-007-9092-8 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Isbrandt, D. & von Figura, K. Cloning and sequence analysis of human guanidinoacetate N-methyltransferase cDNA. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1264, 265–267 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Dong, Y. et al. Phosphatase of regenerating liver 2 (PRL2) deficiency impairs Kit signaling and spermatogenesis. The Journal of biological chemistry 289, 3799–3810, doi:10.1074/jbc.M113.512079 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Eeles, R. A. et al. Identification of 23 new prostate cancer susceptibility loci using the iCOGS custom genotyping array. Nature genetics 45(385–391), 391e381–382, doi:10.1038/ng.2560 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Matsson, H. et al. Alpha-cardiac actin mutations produce atrial septal defects. Human molecular genetics 17, 256–265, doi:10.1093/hmg/ddm302 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Mattson, M. P. Awareness of hormesis will enhance future research in basic and applied neuroscience. Critical reviews in toxicology 38, 633–639, doi:10.1080/10408440802026406 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Le Bourg, E. H. Aging and longevity. Biochimica et biophysica acta 1790, 1030–1039, doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.01.004 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Manchenkov, T., Pasillas, M. P., Haddad, G. G. & Imam, F. B. Novel Genes Critical for Hypoxic Preconditioning in Zebrafish Are Regulators of Insulin and Glucose Metabolism. G3 (Bethesda, Md.) 5, 1107–1116, doi:10.1534/g3.115.018010 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Marasco, V., Boner, W., Heidinger, B., Griffiths, K. & Monaghan, P. Repeated exposure to stressful conditions can have beneficial effects on survival. Experimental gerontology 69, 170–175, doi:10.1016/j.exger.2015.06.011 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Le Bourg, E. Life-time protection against severe heat stress by exposing young Drosophila melanogaster flies to a mild cold stress. Biogerontology 17, 409–415, doi:10.1007/s10522-015-9629-1 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 30, 2114–2120, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Trapnell, C., Pachter, L. & Salzberg, S. L. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 25, 1105–1111, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Trapnell, C. et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nature biotechnology 28, 511–515, doi:10.1038/nbt.1621 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Anders, S. & Huber, W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome biology 11, R106–R106, doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-10-r106 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Langmead, B. Aligning short sequencing reads with Bowtie. Current protocols in bioinformatics/editoral board, Andreas D. Baxevanis… [et al.] Chapter 11, Unit 11.17, doi:10.1002/0471250953.bi1107s32 (2010).

  69. 69.

    Langmead, B., Trapnell, C., Pop, M. & Salzberg, S. L. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome biology 10, R25, doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Wang, H. Q., Tuominen, L. K. & Tsai, C. J. SLIM: a sliding linear model for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses in datasets with dependence structures. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 27, 225–231, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq650 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nature protocols 8, 1494–1512, doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.084 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Conesa, A. & Gotz, S. Blast2GO: A comprehensive suite for functional analysis in plant genomics. International journal of plant genomics 2008, 619832, doi:10.1155/2008/619832 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Alexa, A., Rahnenfuhrer, J. & Lengauer, T. Improved scoring of functional groups from gene expression data by decorrelating GO graph structure. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 22, 1600–1607, doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl140 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the Research Council of Norway under Grant 194050 and the Norwegian Institute of Food, Fisheries and Aquaculture (Nofima) Strategic Internal Project under Grant 10878.

Author information




H.T., H.J. and Ø.A. conceived and designed the experiment. H.T. and H.J. conducted the challenges and collected samples for transcriptome and methylome sequencing. H.J. performed RNA and DNA extractions and quantifications. E.H.J., H.K.J. and V.J.B. raised the fish and measured growth performance up to 35 days after seawater transfer. H.K.M. and N.R. performed the bioinformatics and statistical analyses. H.K.M. drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data and improvement of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hooman K. Moghadam.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moghadam, H.K., Johnsen, H., Robinson, N. et al. Impacts of Early Life Stress on the Methylome and Transcriptome of Atlantic Salmon. Sci Rep 7, 5023 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing