Table 6 Estimates from the mixture models for Experiment 5, calculated using a model in which neither K nor PNT could differ between Near and Far conditions (Model 1), a model in which only PNT could differ (Model 2) and a model in which both K and PNT could differ (Model 3). The 95% confidence interval is shown in parentheses, which was found by bootstrapping the data 100 times. LL denotes the log likelihood.

From: Competitive interactions affect working memory performance for both simultaneous and sequential stimulus presentation

   K P T P NT P U LL
Second item Model 1 5.5 (0.05) 0.80 (0.002) 0.08 (0.001) 0.12 (0.002) −4104.1 (14.1)
Model 2 5.5 (0.05) 0.80 (0.002) Near: 0.09 (0.002) Far: 0.08 (0.002) 0.12 (0.002) −4103.4 (14.1)
Model 3 Near: 5.5 (0.06) Far: 5.5 (0.06) 0.80 (0.002) Near: 0.09 (0.002) Far: 0.08 (0.002) 0.12 (0.002) −4102.7 (14.1)
First item Model 1 5.0 (0.04) 0.76 (0.002) 0.10 (0.002) 0.14 (0.002) −4535.3 (11.9)
Model 2 5.0 (0.04) 0.76 (0.002) Near: 0.12 (0.002) Far: 0.09 (0.002) 0.14 (0.002) −4530.8 (11.8)
Model 3 Near: 4.7 (0.05) Far: 5.2 (0.06) 0.76 (0.002) Near: 0.12 (0.002) Far: 0.09 (0.002) 0.14 (0.002) −4529.4 (11.8)