The energy flow during natural photosynthesis is controlled by maintaining the spatial arrangement of pigments, employing helices as scaffolds. In this study, we have developed porphyrin-peptoid (pigment-helix) conjugates (PPCs) that can modulate the donor-acceptor energy transfer efficiency with exceptional precision by controlling the relative distance and orientation of the two pigments. Five donor-acceptor molecular dyads were constructed using zinc porphyrin and free base porphyrin (Zn(i + 2)–Zn(i + 6)), and highly efficient energy transfer was demonstrated with estimated efficiencies ranging from 92% to 96% measured by static fluorescence emission in CH2Cl2 and from 96.3% to 97.6% using femtosecond transient absorption measurements in toluene, depending on the relative spatial arrangement of the donor-acceptor pairs. Our results suggest that the remarkable precision and tunability exhibited by nature can be achieved by mimicking the design principles of natural photosynthetic proteins.
In natural photosynthetic proteins, the array of chlorophylls plays an essential role in the light-harvesting process, and in transferring the harvested energy to the reaction center (RC). Adjacent chlorophylls, which are precisely arranged in light-harvesting complexes (LHCs) at a distance of ~10 Å, interact strongly with, and are energetically coupled to each other, thereby delocalizing their excited states1, 2. Inspired by natural proteins, numerous attempts have been made to organize porphyrins, the core chromophores of chlorophylls, in higher order structures by displaying them on other scaffolding materials such as peptides3, 4, synthetic polymers5,6,7, DNA8,9,10,11, and even viruses and bacteriophages12,13,14,15. In addition to mimicking the natural light-harvesting system, porphyrin arrays have been extensively investigated for their potential use as sensors16,17,18, catalysts19, and photodynamic therapy agents20.
However, construction of a non-covalently interacting porphyrin array with a precisely defined set of distances and orientations has been hampered by the lack of efficient scaffolding materials and the difficulty in positioning individual porphyrins at will. As a result, studies of through-space interactions among porphyrins in defined distances and orientations, especially in face-to-face arrangements, have been rarely achieved and still remained as a challenge. The development of efficient artificial LHCs to further elucidate natural photosynthetic systems necessitates the identification of efficient scaffolding materials to precisely control the interactions among porphyrins with synthetic accessibility.
Peptoids are a class of bio-inspired peptide derivatives based on oligo-N-substituted glycines. Peptoids have emerged as attractive functional materials since the discovery of the submonomer protocol21, primarily because of their synthetic versatility and side chain diversity (arising from the variability in available primary amine submonomers). Sequential addition of monomers by solid-phase synthesis enables chemists to control the chain length, side chain functionality, and monomer sequence of desired peptoids. Post-synthetic decoration of peptoid side chains with various functional moieties is also well established22. Unlike natural peptides, peptoids are devoid of backbone hydrogen bond donors; however, a well-defined helical structure can be generated by steric and electronic interactions between the backbone amides and α-chiral aromatic side chains23,24,25,26. The conformations of canonical peptoid helices have a periodicity of three residues per turn and a pitch length of ~6.0 Å, resembling natural poly-proline type I (PPI) structures25, 27,28,29. As a result, side chain modifications at desired residues with defined spatial distances and orientations are possible using peptoid helices. With these unique features, peptoids stand out as useful scaffolding materials that can be used to display functional groups at specific positions.
Nature utilizes α-helical peptides and core chromophores as building blocks to construct large photosynthetic proteins (Fig. 1)30. Likewise, an artificial LHC can be constructed using α-helical peptoids and porphyrins as building blocks, resulting in a complex resembling a single unit of natural LHC. Previously, a set of porphyrin-peptoid conjugates (PPCs) with varying distances, orientations, and number of conjugated porphyrins, were synthesized taking advantage of the structural characteristics of peptoid helices31. Each PPC showed a distinct degree of J-aggregation via inter-porphyrin π-π interactions, depending on the spatial arrangement of the displayed porphyrins. In addition, dipole-dipole interactions between the displayed porphyrins were investigated with respect to the controlled spatial factors.
In the present study, we synthesized a set of molecular dyads comprising donors and acceptors. In the peptoid helix, the zinc-containing porphyrin was positioned as an energy donor, and the energy-accepting free base porphyrin was positioned with precise control of spatial relationship between the donor and the acceptor; consequently, these structures exhibited finely tunable and highly efficient energy transfer demonstrated by both static fluorescence emission and time-resolved transient absorption spectroscopy. The structural properties of porphyrin-peptoid conjugates (PPCs) were investigated with circular dichroism spectroscopy and molecular dynamics simulation. To our knowledge, this level of structural precision between the energy donor and acceptor has rarely been reported. Moreover, our donor-acceptor dyad system provides, (1) an example of the fine tuning of the energy transfer efficiency that is routinely carried out by nature, (2) a molecular platform that contributes towards better understanding of the physical chemistry of natural photosynthetic systems, and (3) a strategy for the modulation of porphyrin interactions that can be used in various applications, such as catalysis, sensors, and biomedicine.
All reagents and solvents were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Acros organics, Novabiochem and TCI. They were used without further purification. N,N’-Diisopropylcarbodiimide was purchased from Advanced ChemTech, KY, USA. For peptoid synthesis and conjugation reactions, peptide synthesis grade DMF and anhydrous DCM (>99.8%) were used, respectively. Flash column chromatography was conducted with silica gel 60 (230–400 mesh, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) while monitored by thin-layer chromatography with precoated aluminum-backed TLC sheets (silica gel 60 F254, EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). For detection of protected amine, 2% ninhydrin in ethanol was used. Solvents were evaporated by rotary evaporator under reduced pressure. Abbreviations for reagents are as follows: 9-fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl (Fmoc); trifluoroacetic acid (TFA); triisopropylsilane (TIS); dichloromethane (DCM); N,N’-dimethylformamide (DMF); N,N’-diisopropylcarbodiimide (DIC); acetonitrile (ACN); chloroform (CHCl3); and 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone (NMP).
UV-vis spectra were measured on an Ultrospec 2100 pro UV-vis Spectrophotometer (GE healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) at room temperature in a quartz cuvette with 1 mm path length. HPLC grade DCM was used for a serial dilution of sample solutions and for a blank. Absorbance was observed in the range of 300–700 nm.
Fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of Zn PPCs were observed on an LS55 fluorescence spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA) controlled by an FL winlab software. Typically, samples were prepared from a serial dilution with DCM. Emission measurements of Zn PPCs were performed with excitation wavelength at 550 nm, 12.0 nm slit width and 50 nm/min scanning speed. Fluorescence excitation spectra of Zn PPCs were obtained using the same samples with the conditions of 8.0 nm slit width, 200 nm/min scanning speed and two different emission wavelengths: ZnTPP specific emission wavelength at 605 nm and fbTPP specific emission wavelength at 716 nm. For negligible self-quenching, absorbance of Zn PPCs was kept below 0.1.
Peptoid amine submonomers
(S)-N-(1-Phenylethyl)glycine (or Nspe, (S)-1-phenylethylamine) and (R)-N-(1-phenylethyl)glycine (or Nrpe, (R)-1-phenylethylamine) were obtained from Sigma Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA) at a purity of >99%. N-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-1,4-diaminobutane (or Nlys(Boc)) and para-methoxytrityl-1,4-diaminobutane (or Nlys(mmt)) were synthesized using a reported procedure32. Structures of the peptoid side chains derived from these amine submonomers are shown in Fig. 2.
General procedure for peptoid synthesis
Peptoid nonamers and dodecamers were synthesized using microwave-assisted solid-phase submonomer synthesis methods21 on an Fmoc-Rink amide MBHA resin. A CEM MARS multimodal microwave reactor equipped with a fiber-optics temperature probe and a magnetic stirrer was used (CEM Corp., Matthews, NC, USA). The fiber-optics temperature probe was positioned in the reaction mixture, and the solution was stirred and irradiated at different reaction conditions as described below. All microwave reactions were carried out at atmospheric pressure. Fmoc-Rink amide MBHA resin (0.59 mmol/g, Novabiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) was used to generate C-terminal amide peptoids. After Fmoc deprotection, each monomer was added by a series of bromoacetylation and displacement of bromide by a primary amine21. These two steps were iterated with appropriate primary amines until desired peptoid sequence was obtained. The N-terminal acetylation of peptoid oligomers was performed by adding excess amount of acetic anhydride (50 equivalents) and pyridine (55 equivalents) in DMF. Typically, 0.25 mmol reaction scale was used (0.42 g of resin). The resin swelled in DMF for 20 minutes and drained. For Fmoc deprotection, the resin was treated twice with 20% (v/v) piperidine in DMF (5 ml each) at room temperature for 60 seconds and at 80 °C (microwave, 600 W max power, ramp 2 minutes) for 2 minutes. For bromoacetylation, bromoacetic acid (4.18 ml of 1.2 M bromoacetic acid in DMF stock solution, 5 mmol) and N,N’-diisopropylcarbodiimide (0.63 g, 5 mmol, 0.78 ml) were added, and the reaction mixture was stirred and irradiated at 35 °C (microwave, 400 W 15% power, ramp 0.5 minutes) for 2 minutes. For the displacement step, (S)-N-(1-phenylethyl)glycine (Nspe, 5 ml of 2.0 M in NMP stock solution, 10 mmol), mono-Mmt protected 1,4-diaminobutane (NLys(Mmt), 5 ml of 1.0 M in NMP stock solution, 5 mmol) or mono tert-butyloxycarbonyl protected 1,4-diaminobutane (NLys(Boc), 5 ml of 1.0 M in NMP stock solution) were added. The mixture was stirred and irradiated at 80 °C (microwave, 400 W 75% power, ramp 2 minutes) for 1.5 minutes. Between each step, the resin was thoroughly washed with DMF and DCM. The N-terminal acetylation was performed by adding acetic anhydride (1.28 g, 12.5 mmol, 1.2 ml) and pyridine (1.08 g, 13.7 mmol, 1.1 ml) to the resin-bound peptoid in DMF (1.5 ml). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 2 h.
Prior to porphyrin conjugation reaction, Mmt deprotection was performed by treating resin-bound peptoid with 0.75% TFA (DCM: TFA: TIS = 94.25: 0.75: 5). To the resin was added 0.75% TFA solution (6 ml), and stirring continued for 2 minutes at room temperature. After draining orange color solution, the resin was washed with DCM. These steps were repeated for 7 times or more until the drained solution became clear. Then, the deprotected amine was conjugated with fbTPP using the previously prepared fbTPP-NHS ester (See Supplementary Fig. S1). Typically, 1.5 equivalents of fbTPP-NHS ester per amine was used. Resin-bound and Mmt deprotected peptoid (0.0625 mmol) was washed first with the solution of DCM (4 ml) and DIEA (0.15 ml) for 1 minute to remove any residual TFA. To the resin was added fbTPP-NHS ester (150 mg, 0.20 mmol) in DCM (7 ml), followed by DIEA (0.07 ml, 0.40 mmol). The cartridge was sealed, and the reaction was stirred overnight under N2 atmosphere. The reaction mixture was drained, and the resin was washed thoroughly with DMF and DCM. For Zn PPCs, peptoid was then cleaved from resin using 95% TFA solution (TFA: DCM = 95: 5) for 13 minutes providing crude 3 (Fig. 3). The cleavage solution was filtered by solid-phase extraction (SPE) cartridges with 20 μ PE frit (Applied Separations, Allentown, PA, USA) and the volatiles were removed by lyophilizer. The crude peptoids were dissolved in ACN and purified by preparative HPLC (see HPLC and ESI-MS conditions in the following section).
The purified PPC (3 in Fig. 3) (10.9 mg, 0.005 mmol) was dissolved in DCM (2 ml). To this solution was added diisopropylethylamine (DIEA, 5 equivalents, 3.4 mg, 0.026 mmol), and stirring continued for 10 minutes for deprotonation of porphyrin. TFA salts were removed by aqueous extraction, and the organic phase was collected, dried by adding Na2SO4, and concentrated. Compound 3 was dissolved in DCM (2 ml) followed by addition of zinc acetate (10 equivalents, 9.5 mg, 0.052 mmol) in MeOH (500 µl). The reaction mixture was kept stirring overnight. Removal of excess zinc acetate was performed by water extraction.
To the solution of peptoid with one ZnTPP in DCM (2 ml), DIEA (2 equivalents, 0.010 mmol) was firstly added. fbTPP-COOH (5-(4-carboxyphenyl)-10, 15, 20- tetraphenylporphyrin, 1.2 equivalents, 0.0063 mmol) and DIEA (1.2 equivalents, 0.0063 mmol) in DCM (1 ml) was added into the PPC solution followed by the addition of HATU (1.2 equivalents, 0.0063 mmol) in DMF (50 µl). The reaction mixture was kept stirring for overnight. After water extraction, desired product was purified using preparative HPLC.
Purification of Zn(i + n) compounds
Analytical HPLC was performed on a Waters HPLC system (Waters 2489 UV-Visible Detector, Waters 1525 Binary HPLC Pump, Waters 2707 Autosampler, and Waters 5CH column oven) with a C18 column (SunFire C18, 4.6 × 250 mm, 5 μm). The column oven temperature was set at 40 °C. Typically, the mobile phase was used as follows: (A, water + 0.1% TFA; B, ACN + 0.1% TFA) 2 minutes using 30% of B, a linear gradient to 100% B over 20 minutes, and then holding 100% B over 20 minutes. The flow rate was 1 mL/min. The purity of sample was monitored by absorbance at 220 nm. For Zn-ref and Fb-ref, the mobile phase was given as follows: 2 minutes using 50% of B, a linear gradient to 100% B over 15 minutes, and then holding 100% B over 30 minutes. Peptoids were purified by preparative HPLC system (Waters prepLC system, Waters 2489 UV-Visible Detector, Waters fraction collector III) with a C18 column (SunFire C18, 19 × 150 mm, 5 μm) at a flow rate of 14 mL/min. For compound 3, the mobile phase conditions were as follows: (A, water + 0.1% TFA; B, ACN + 0.1% TFA) 5 minutes using 50% of B, a linear gradient to 100% B over 20 minutes, and then holding 100% B over 15 minutes. For Zn PPCs, the mobile phase gradient for 60 minutes was given as follows: 10 minutes using 50% of B, a linear gradient to 80% B over 10 minutes and then holding over 15 minutes, a linear gradient to 100% B over 15 minutes and then holding over 10 minutes. Sample elution was monitored at 220 and 254 nm by absorbance. The purity of the product fractions was confirmed by analytical HPLC. Each fraction was further analyzed by LC/MS performed on an Agilent 6520 Q-TOF mass spectrometer. Additional SPE purification was performed to remove residual TFA (See Supplementary information, page 3).
Result and Discussion
Synthesis of Porphyrin-Peptoid Conjugates (PPCs)
A set of porphyrin-peptoid conjugates displaying two free base porphyrins (Fb PPCs) or one zinc porphyrin and one free base porphyrin (Zn PPCs) with various spatial arrangements of porphyrins were designed and synthesized employing the unique structural features of peptoid helices (three residues per turn periodicity and 6 Å pitch distance). The exact sequences of all PPCs are shown in Fig. 2. Nonameric peptoid scaffold was used for (i, i + 2), (i, i + 3), and reference PPCs, and dodecameric peptoid was used for (i, i + 4), (i, i + 5) and (i, i + 6) PPCs. Figure 3 shows the representative synthetic routes for Fb PPCs and Zn PPCs. Peptoid helices were synthesized employing a solid-phase and microwave-assisted submonomer protocol21. The helical folds were induced by an α-chiral side chain (Nspe or (S)-(–)-1-phenylethylamine), which induces right-handedness26, 27. Nlys (1,4-diaminobutane) was incorporated at the position of porphyrin conjugation. The synthesis of Zn( i + n ) PPCs was not straightforward, primarily due to the lability of zinc porphyrin under acidic conditions; in other words, demetalation of zinc readily occurs under acidic conditions, such as exposure to TFA. Free base tetraphenylporphyrin (fbTPP) and zinc-containing tetraphenylporphyrin (ZnTPP) were located in the peptoid sequence at the position of Nlys(Boc) and Nlys(Mmt), respectively. After numerous attempts, metalation of 2, followed by fbTPP conjugation appeared to be most feasible synthetic route that yielded a good quantity of the desired pure Zn( i + 3).
Structural Analysis of Porphyrin-Peptoid Conjugates (PPCs)
The helicity of each Fb PPC was measured by circular dichroism (CD) spectra. It is generally known that the α-chiral and aromatic side chains of a peptoid sequence are strong driving forces for the development of polyproline type-I (PPI)-like helices, through steric and electronic interactions23,24,25,26, 33. PPCs are composed of monomers with α-chiral and aromatic side chains (such as Nspe and Nrpe); therefore, typical PPI-like CD signatures, with two minima at 202 nm and 220 nm and one maximum at 192 nm, were observed for all Fb PPCs. Fb( i + 3)-r, designed with a monomer having the opposite chirality, showed a mirror image of Fb( i + 3) (Fig. 4(a)).
The influence of porphyrin conjugation on the helical integrity of peptoids was also monitored. Differing propensities were observed based on the spatial arrangements of the displayed porphyrins. The helicity of the PPCs decreased when two porphyrins were displayed on the same face (such as Fb( i + 3) and Fb( i + 6)); the decrease in helicity was greater in the dodecamer (Fb( i + 6)), compared to the nonamer (Fb( i + 3)) (Fig. 4(b)). In other words, the population of PPI-type helical conformers reduced upon porphyrin conjugation. The 220 nm peak in the CD spectrum is known to reflect the contribution of cis-amide containing conformers; therefore, peptoid helical folds can be examined based on the intensity of this peak34. Interestingly, when two porphyrins were displayed at different faces (Fb( i + 2), Fb( i + 4) and Fb( i + 5)), the CD intensity at 220 nm increased, indicating that the population of the PPI-type helical conformers increased upon porphyrin conjugation. A noticeable red-shift was observed at ~ 220 nm in all PPCs after porphyrin conjugation, caused by the n → π* transition of carbonyl lone pair to π* orbital in the aromatic side chains16, except in Fb( i + 3) (Fig. 4(b)). These results suggest the possibility of interaction between porphyrins and the adjacent aromatic side chains. Additional electronic interactions with porphyrins would stabilize the π* orbitals of side-chain phenyl groups, causing the red-shift of the 220-nm peaks. Porphyrins on Fb( i + 3) might not have enough space to interact with phenyl groups, because of their spatial location next to each other at a distance of ~6 Å.
Along with the red-shifted CD spectra, the propensity of peptoid helical folds upon porphyrin conjugation could be interpreted based on the flexibility of the linker that connects conjugated porphyrins to the peptoid backbone. Since porphyrins are connected with flexible n-butyl linkers, they can move or rotate into a favorable conformation exhibiting minimum energy. For PPC displaying two porphyrins on a slipped-cofacial arrangement, porphyrins would bend to interact with each other in the direction of peptoid helical folds, as greater amount of energy (induced by steric and electronic interactions between chiral side chains) is required to resist the peptoid helical folds. As a result, movement of porphyrins towards the peptoid helical folds may result in strengthened helicity. On the other hand, PPCs displaying porphyrins on the same face do not need to move along with the peptoid helical folds to interact with each other. Therefore, non-directional movement of each porphyrin that occupies a significant part in the entire molecular weight of PPC may decrease the helical folds of peptoids. A comparison of Fb( i + 3) and Fb( i + 6), which were composed of porphyrins arranged face-to-face, showed that porphyrins on Fb( i + 6) had enough space to move, whereas porphyrins on Fb( i + 3) did not; this was also revealed by a red-shift of 220 nm peak in the CD spectra. In addition, the larger heterogeneity of dodecameric peptoids relative to nonameric peptoids explains more significant effects on porphyrin conjugation in Fb( i + 6). Taken together, these results support the influence of relative porphyrin orientations on the maintenance of peptoid helical folds. In addition, as reported by Barron et al.35, we observed the peptoid CD signature of Fb( i + 2) and Fb( i + 3) did not differ significantly with variations in the temperature (Fig. 4(c)).
Measurement of Energy Transfer Efficiency Using Absorption and Fluorescence Spectroscopic Analysis
Spectroscopic analysis of Zn PPCs was performed in dichloromethane to avoid solvent (e.g., acetonitrile) coordination with Zn. In the Soret region, the absorption profiles of Zn PPCs were shown as an average of Zn-ref and Fb-ref, thereby verifying the existence of fbTPP and ZnTPP in Zn PPCs (Fig. 5(a)). In the Q-band region, Zn-ref showed two bands, because of the D 4h symmetry of zinc porphyrin, whereas both Zn( i + 3) and Fb-ref showed four peaks (Fig. 5(b)). Interestingly, the degree of shift in the shoulder for Zn PPCs was slightly different depending on the spatial arrangement of the displayed porphyrins (Fig. 5(c), inset), with the shoulder intensity increasing around 430 nm from Zn( i + 6) to Zn( i + 2), suggesting strongest donor-acceptor coupling in Zn( i + 2).
We monitored the fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of Zn PPCs prior to investigating the energy transfer efficiency (Fig. 6). Fluorescence excitation of Zn PPCs were recorded at two different emission wavelengths specific for donor (ZnTPP) and acceptor (fbTPP) emission (605 nm and 716 nm, respectively; Fig. 6(a)–(d)). At the emission wavelength (λem) of 605 nm, Zn-ref showed a strong excitation spectrum with two Q-band peaks (D 4h symmetry of zinc porphyrin); however, the Zn PPCs showed a drastic decrease in excitation, suggesting an energy transfer from ZnTPP to fbTPP (Fig. 6(a)). Indirect information regarding the degree of energy transfer was obtained from the decreased peak intensity (which indicates an increase in the energy transfer) at 425 nm from Zn( i + 6) to Zn( i + 2) (Fig. 6(c)). Measurement of the excitation spectra at λem = 716 nm showed no excitation for Zn-ref, but typical Soret band and Q-bands for Fb-ref (Fig. 6(b)). Split Soret bands at 415 nm and 425 nm (from fbTPP and ZnTPP, respectively) were shown, demonstrating the dual contribution (from S0 to S2 transition) of ZnTPP and fbTPP for acceptor (fbTPP) emission (S1 to S0). The extensive spectral overlap between donor and acceptor made it difficult to identify a wavelength that solely excites the donor without contribution from direct acceptor excitation. As shown in Figs 5(b) and 6(d), donor (ZnTPP) absorbs predominantly at 550 nm, and donor excitation at this wavelength was a major contributor to acceptor emission; therefore, λex = 550 nm was used in the following fluorescence emission and energy transfer studies36, 37.
With an excitation at 550 nm where the absorption of ZnTPP was more than twice that of fbTPP, all Zn PPCs showed acceptor-like emission profiles (Fig. 6(f)). A peak at 605 nm caused by donor (ZnTPP) emission was significantly diminished, indicating a highly efficient energy transfer. For each Zn PPC, the energy transfer efficiency was estimated using the equation, E = 1 − F’/F, where F’ and F denote the fluorescence intensities of the donor in the presence and absence of the acceptor, respectively (See Supplementary page 12)38, 39. Absorbed energy was transferred at an efficiency of >90% in all Zn PPCs, and the energy efficiency was modulated extremely precisely over a range of 92–96%, in roughly 1% increments from Zn( i + 6) to Zn( i + 2) (E 2 in Table 1).
To measure the rate constant and efficiency of the energy transfer, femtosecond transient absorption measurements with 547 nm were performed40, 41. Figure 7(a)–(e) show transient absorption spectra of Zn( i + 2)-Zn( i + 6) in toluene, where the ground state bleaching bands at 515 and 550 nm and stimulated emission bands at 600, 650, and 720 nm (not shown) are mixed with much broader excited state absorption (ESA) bands. The kinetics of ESA bands at 474 nm, compared in Fig. 7(f), show ultrafast (65–100 ps) decay components which are considered as lifetimes of ZnTPP in Zn PPCs. The dynamics of Zn( i + 2) was the fastest and that of Zn( i + 6) was the slowest among Zn PPCs. Transient absorption results were further analyzed by a global analysis with a sequential model (See Supplementary page 15)42. Two distinct kinetic components, one with faster (64–97 ps) lifetimes and the other with much slower (~10 ns) ones, were resolved from the results of all Zn PPCs. Figure 8 shows the normalized evolution-assisted difference spectra (EADS) of two components of all Zn PPCs. The EADS of 64–97 ps lifetimes are almost identical to that of ZnTPP, and the EADS of ~10 ns lifetimes to that of fbTPP (See Supplementary Fig. S9), which confirms ultrafast energy transfer from ZnTPP to fbTPP in all Zn PPCs.
The energy transfer rate constants (k ET) are calculated from the lifetimes of ZnTPP in the Zn PPCs and in the absence of accepter fbTPP (τDA and τD, respectively) using k ET = (τDA)−1 − (τD)−1. The τD was measured as 2.63 ns from a separate time-correlated single photon counting (TCSPC) measurement (See Supplemenatry page 17)43. The energy transfer efficiency (E) of ZnTPP → fbTPP was also evaluated using E = 1 − τDA/τD, resulting in 97.6–96.3% for Zn( i + 2)-Zn( i + 6). The energy transfer kinetics of all Zn PPCs are summarizd in Table 1.
The energy transfer rate and efficiency increased as the donor-acceptor placement changed from (i, i + 6) to (i, i + 2). This trend and the precise modulation of energy transfer efficiency were confirmed both by static fluorescence emission and by femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. To gain structural insight into how the spacing of two porphyrins is influenced by peptoid sequences, we performed ~1.2 μs replica-exchange molecular dynamics (REMD) simulations28, 44, 45. In these simulations, we compared (i, i + 2) and (i, i + 3) PPCs with two fbTPPs attached (See Supplementary page 8–11). The simulation results show considerable conformational heterogeneity of PPCs mainly by the flexible n-butyl linkers conjugating the porphyrin groups. Moreover, the porphyrins are predicted to be closer together for (i, i + 2) PPC, potentially with greater excitonic coupling, than for (i, i + 3) PPC (See Supplementary Fig. S7). Based on the structural characteristics of typical poly-proline type I (PPI) peptoid helix itself26, 29, two porphyrins in Zn( i + 2) and Zn( i + 3) are expected to be slipped-cofacial and face-to-face arrangement, respectively. However, two porphyrins in Zn( i + 2) appears to prefer face-to-face arrangement as demonstrated by the simulation result (See Supplementary Fig. S7(a)), with the shorter inter-porphyrin distance, which resulted in the greatest energy transfer rate and efficiency among all the PPCs.
In this study, we developed an energy transfer system employing donor and acceptor porphyrins displayed on a peptoid helix scaffold. The PPC dyads are sufficiently well-structured, (1) maintaining close proximity between donor-acceptor porphyrins without uncontrolled porphyrin aggregations, (2) providing ultrafast energy transfer with high efficiency, and (3) modulating energy transfer efficiency depending on the relative spatial arrangement of the donor-acceptor pairs. An energy transfer system with this level of precision and tunability has not been reported so far. Therefore, we believe that this system could be a fundamental research tool to understand various energy transfer events, including natural photosynthetic light harvesting. Employing nature’s design principle, sophisticated pigment-helix conjugates that can mimic natural light-harvesting molecular apparatus are currently being synthesized.
Fassioli, F., Dinshaw, R., Arpin, P. C. & Scholes, G. D. Photosynthetic light harvesting: excitons and coherence. J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20130901 (2014).
Clegg, R. M., Sener, M. & Govindjee. From Förster resonance energy transfer to coherent resonance energy transfer and back in Optical Biopsy VII (ed. Alfano, R. R.), (SPIE, 2010).
Wang, Q. et al. Morphology and chirality controlled self-assembled nanostructures of porphyrin–pentapeptide conjugate: effect of the peptide secondary conformation. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 8057–8065 (2011).
Dunetz, J. R. et al. Self-Assembling Porphyrin-Modified Peptides. Org. Lett. 7, 2559–2561 (2005).
de Witte, P. A. et al. Helical Polymer-Anchored Porphyrin Nanorods. Chem. Eur. J 9, 1775–1781 (2003).
Roberts, D. A., Schmidt, T. W., Crossley, M. J. & Perrier, S. Tunable Self-Assembly of Triazole-Linked Porphyrin–Polymer Conjugates. Chem. Eur. J 19, 12759–12770 (2013).
Screen, T. E. O., Thorne, J. R. G., Denning, R. G., Bucknall, D. G. & Anderson, H. L. Amplified Optical Nonlinearity in a Self-Assembled Double-Strand Conjugated Porphyrin Polymer Ladder. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 9712–9713 (2002).
Sargsyan, G. & Balaz, M. Porphyrin–DNA conjugates: porphyrin induced adenine–guanine homoduplex stabilization and interduplex assemblies. Org. Biomol. Chem. 10, 5533–5540 (2012).
Bouamaied, I., Nguyen, T., Rühl, T. & Stulz, E. Supramolecular helical porphyrin arrays using DNA as a scaffold. Org. Biomol. Chem. 6, 3888–3891 (2008).
Nguyen, T., Brewer, A. & Stulz, E. Duplex Stabilization and Energy Transfer in Zipper Porphyrin–DNA. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 1974–1977 (2009).
Fendt, L. A., Bouamaied, I., Thöni, S., Amiot, N. & Stulz, E. DNA as Supramolecular Scaffold for Porphyrin Arrays on the Nanometer Scale. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 15319–15329 (2007).
Nam, Y. S. et al. Virus-Templated Assembly of Porphyrins into Light-Harvesting Nanoantennae. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 1462–1463 (2010).
Endo, M., Fujitsuka, M. & Majima, T. Porphyrin Light-Harvesting Arrays Constructed in the Recombinant Tobacco Mosaic Virus Scaffold. Chem. Eur. J 13, 8660–8666 (2007).
Stephanopoulos, N., Carrico, Z. M. & Francis, M. B. Nanoscale Integration of Sensitizing Chromophores and Porphyrins Using Bacteriophage MS2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 9498–9502 (2009).
Scolaro, L. M. et al. Supramolecular Binding of Cationic Porphyrins on a Filamentous Bacteriophage Template: Toward a Noncovalent Antenna System. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 7446–7447 (2006).
Purrello, R., Gurrieri, S. & Lauceri, R. Porphyrin assemblies as chemical sensors. Coord. Chem. Rev. 190–192, 683–706 (1999).
Ema, T., Ura, N., Eguchi, K., Ise, Y. & Sakai, T. Chiral porphyrin dimer with a macrocyclic cavity for intercalation of aromatic guests. Chem. Commun. 47, 6090–6092 (2011).
Lvova, L., Di Natale, C. & Paolesse, R. Porphyrin-based chemical sensors and multisensor arrays operating in the liquid phase. Sens. Actuators B 179, 21–31 (2013).
Lee, J. et al. Metal–organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38, 1450–1459 (2009).
Maeda, C. et al. Large Porphyrin Squares from the Self-Assembly of meso-Triazole-Appended L-Shaped meso–meso-Linked ZnII–Triporphyrins: Synthesis and Efficient Energy Transfer. Chem. Eur. J 16, 5052–5061 (2010).
Zuckermann, R. N., Kerr, J. M., Kent, S. B. H. & Moos, W. H. Efficient method for the preparation of peptoids [oligo(N-substituted glycines)] by submonomer solid-phase synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114, 10646–10647 (1992).
Nam, H. Y. & Seo, J. Postsynthetic modification of peptoids via the Suzuki-Miyaura cross-coupling reaction. Biopolymers 106, 82–88 (2016).
Wu, C. W., Sanborn, T. J., Huang, K., Zuckermann, R. N. & Barron, A. E. Peptoid Oligomers with α-Chiral, Aromatic Side Chains: Sequence Requirements for the Formation of Stable Peptoid Helices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 6778–6784 (2001).
Wu, C. W., Sanborn, T. J., Zuckermann, R. N. & Barron, A. E. Peptoid Oligomers with α-Chiral, Aromatic Side Chains: Effects of Chain Length on Secondary Structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123, 2958–2963 (2001).
Wu, C. W. et al. Structural and Spectroscopic Studies of Peptoid Oligomers with α-Chiral Aliphatic Side Chains. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 125, 13525–13530 (2003).
Kirshenbaum, K. et al. Sequence-specific polypeptoids: A diverse family of heteropolymers with stable secondary structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 4303–4308 (1998).
Armand, P. et al. Chiral N-substituted glycines can form stable helical conformations. Fold. Des. 2, 369–375 (1997).
Butterfoss, G. L. et al. De novo structure prediction and experimental characterization of folded peptoid oligomers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14320–14325 (2012).
Stringer, J. R., Crapster, J. A., Guzei, I. A. & Blackwell, H. E. Extraordinarily Robust Polyproline Type I Peptoid Helices Generated via the Incorporation of α-Chiral Aromatic N-1-Naphthylethyl Side Chains. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 15559–15567 (2011).
Blankenship, R. E. Molecular Mechanism of Photosynthesis, 2nd ed (Wiley-Blackwell, 2014).
Kang, B., Chung, S., Ahn, Y. D., Lee, J. & Seo, J. Porphyrin–Peptoid Conjugates: Face-to-Face Display of Porphyrins on Peptoid Helices. Org. Lett. 15, 1670–1673 (2013).
Krapcho, A. P. & Kuell, C. S. Mono-Protected Diamines. N-tert-Butoxycarbonyl-α,ω-Alkanediamines from α,ω-Alkanediamines. Synth. Commun 20, 2559–2564 (1990).
Gorske, B. C., Bastian, B. L., Geske, G. D. & Blackwell, H. E. Local and Tunable n → π* Interactions Regulate Amide Isomerism in the Peptoid Backbone. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 8928–8929 (2007).
Shin, H., Kang, C., Yoon, M. & Seo, J. Peptoid helicity modulation: precise control of peptoid secondary structures via position-specific placement of chiral monomers. Chem. Commun. 50, 4465–4468 (2014).
Sanborn, T. J., Wu, C. W., Zuckermann, R. N. & Barron, A. E. Extreme stability of helices formed by water-soluble poly-N-substituted glycines (polypeptoids) with α-chiral side chains. Biopolymers 63, 12–20 (2002).
Hsiao, J. et al. Soluble Synthetic Multiporphyrin Arrays. 2. Photodynamics of Energy-Transfer Processes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 118, 11181–11193 (1996).
Yang, S. I. et al. Excited-State Energy Transfer and Ground-State Hole/Electron Hopping in p-Phenylene-Linked Porphyrin Dimers. J. Phys. Chem. B 102, 9426–9436 (1998).
Peng, H. Q. et al. Biological Applications of Supramolecular Assemblies Designed for Excitation Energy Transfer. Chem. Rev. 115, 7502–7542 (2015).
Yoneda, Y. et al. Extension of Light-Harvesting Ability of Photosynthetic Light-Harvesting Complex 2 (LH2) through Ultrafast Energy Transfer from Covalently Attached Artificial Chromophores. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 13121–13129 (2015).
Lee, J., Lee, S., Jen, M. & Pang, Y. Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence: Wavelength-Dependent Ultrafast Energy Transfer. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 23285–23291 (2015).
Lee, I., Lee, S. & Pang, Y. Excited-State Dynamics of Carotenoids Studied by Femtosecond Transient Absorption Spectroscopy. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 35, 851–857 (2014).
van Stokkum, I. H., Larsen, D. S. & van Grondelle, R. Global and target analysis of time-resolved spectra. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1657, 82–104 (2004).
Lee, S., Lee, J. & Pang, Y. Excited state intramolecular proton transfer of 1,2-dihydroxyanthraquinone by femtosecond transient absorption spectroscopy. Curr. Appl. Phys. 15, 1492–1499 (2015).
Voelz, V. A., Dill, K. A. & Chorny, I. Peptoid conformational free energy landscapes from implicit-solvent molecular simulations in AMBER. Biopolymers 96, 639–650 (2011).
Mukherjee, S., Zhou, G., Michel, C. & Voelz, V. A. Insights into Peptoid Helix Folding Cooperativity from an Improved Backbone Potential. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 15407–15417 (2015).
This work was financially supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2014R1A2A1A11052865 and 2014R1A1A2058409) and by the “GRI(GIST Research Institute)” Project through a grant provided by GIST in 2016. J.F., S.M. and V.V. were supported by National Science Foundation grants MCB-1412508, and this research was supported in part by the National Science Foundation major research instrumentation grant number CNS-09-58854.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
About this article
Scientific Reports (2019)
Tetrahedron Letters (2018)
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B (2018)