Table 1 Tree topology test for the phylogenetic relationship between CTCFL and CTCF2.

From: CTCF binding landscape in jawless fish with reference to Hox cluster evolution

Rank by log-likelihood (lnL) Tree topology* ΔlnL pAU pKH
1 ((CTCFL,Gn),((La-CTCF2,La),Hf),OG); ML 0.906 0.726
2 ((Gn,((La,La-CTCF2),Hf)),CTCFL,OG); 0.9 0.501 0.274
28 ((Gn,(CTCFL,La-CTCF2)),(La,Hf),OG); 10.3 1.00 × 10−5 0.034
29 (Gn,((CTCFL,La-CTCF2),(La,Hf)),OG); 10.3 5.00 × 10−6 0.034
31 ((Gn,(La,Hf)),(CTCFL,La-CTCF2),OG); 10.3 3.00 × 10−6 0.034
39§ (((Gn,(CTCFL,La-CTCF2)),Hf),La,OG); 15.6 0.024 0.035
  1. *Gn, gnathostome CTCF; La, lamprey CTCF; Hf, hagfish CTCF; OG, outgroup CTCF.
  2. p-value of the approximately unbiased test47
  3. p -value of the Kishino-Hasegawa test48
  4. §The phylogenetic tree supporting the CTCFL-CTCF2 monophyly with the largest pAU among the all tree topologies examined.
  5. Abbreviation: ML, maximum likelihood tree.