Heterogeneous environments shape invader impacts: integrating environmental, structural and functional effects by isoscapes and remote sensing



Spatial heterogeneity of ecosystems crucially influences plant performance, while in return plant feedbacks on their environment may increase heterogeneous patterns. This is of particular relevance for exotic plant invaders that transform native ecosystems, yet, approaches integrating geospatial information of environmental heterogeneity and plant-plant interaction are lacking. Here, we combined remotely sensed information of site topography and vegetation cover with a functional tracer of the N cycle, δ15N. Based on the case study of the invasion of an N2-fixing acacia in a nutrient-poor dune ecosystem, we present the first model that can successfully predict (R 2 = 0.6) small-scale spatial variation of foliar δ15N in a non-fixing native species from observed geospatial data. Thereby, the generalized additive mixed model revealed modulating effects of heterogeneous environments on invader impacts. Hence, linking remote sensing techniques with tracers of biological processes will advance our understanding of the dynamics and functioning of spatially structured heterogeneous systems from small to large spatial scales.


Environmental heterogeneity is a key factor structuring plant communities1,2,3. While spatial heterogeneity determines plant performance, plants in turn feed back on their environment, thereby affecting multiple factors such as abiotic conditions, nutrient cycling or soil biota4, 5, thus further increasing spatial heterogeneity. Abiotic conditions can modulate the outcome of plant-plant interactions6, which is reflected in changes in the balance between competition and facilitation along environmental gradients (e.g. refs 7,8,9). However, there is a clear lack of knowledge and quantitative assessments in how far small-scale heterogeneity within plant communities affects the outcome of plant-plant interactions. In fact, although the effects of competition and facilitation clearly must be considered to be spatially dependent10, the spatial range in which these interactions take place is largely unknown11, 12. This is particularly relevant for prediction of invasion impacts, as plant invasion rarely occurs evenly distributed in recipient communities, particularly during early stages of invasion. Many theories, such as the intermediate disturbance hypothesis13, fluctuating resource hypothesis14, concepts of invasibility of recipient community15 or niche opportunities16 all point towards the importance of the interplay between invader and native species interaction and local environment conditions. However, to what extend environmental heterogeneity modulates these interactions is far from being resolved. Thus, there is a clear need for methods which can adequately trace functional changes and plant-plant interaction spatially at the community scale. In particular, novel tools and approaches are required that integrate geospatial information on functional tracers in heterogeneous environments.

Stable isotope ratios could provide such functional tracer, as they reflect ecological and physiological processes across temporal and spatial scales17,18,19. Spatially explicit representations of isotopic signatures, termed isoscapes 20, provide novel tools to resolve processes at the community scale12, 21,22,23. Specifically, the stable isotopic composition of nitrogen, δ15N, provides a sensitive tracer of changes in the N cycle24,25,26, or of different N sources within plant communities27,28,29. Applied in a spatially explicit manner, δ15N isoscapes revealed the spatial extent of N input by an exotic N2-fixing plant invader into the invaded plant community12, 21, 30. Symbiotically fixed N has an isotopic signature that differs from soil N-sources in many systems, the former being close to the atmospheric value of 0‰. In ecosystem with low N availability δ15N of non-fixing native species can be markedly depleted. Therefore, an increase in δ15N of their foliage in the vicinity of the N2-fixing invader (approaching δ15N of 0‰) indicates significant uptake of fixed nitrogen derived from the invader.

Yet, detecting spatial patterns of functional changes is often complicated in the presence of system-immanent spatial heterogeneity. Accordingly, establishing spatially explicit predictive models of plant functional tracers such as foliar δ15N is challenging due to the complexity and spatial variability of different processes. In the case of N-cycling, such processes can be e.g. transformation of nitrogen within or N-losses from terrestrial ecosystems31, 32. To date, integrated approaches which can incorporate such spatial variability of heterogeneous environments as well as influences of interacting plants are still lacking.

Linking remote sensing with functional tracers can provide a novel way to include spatially dependent processes in community-scale models. For instance, airborne LiDAR (light detection and ranging) yields spatially explicit data that can capture land-surface attributes, such as site topography or vegetation cover33, which potentially govern ecosystem processes. Topography is a major control of physical soil conditions, often correlating with N transformation rates34, 35. Similarly, vegetation cover can modify physical conditions of the soil, such as humidity and temperature, as well as organic matter content, nutrient availability and microbial activity4, 36, 37. In turn, these factors can influence N cycling and therefore, δ15N values of plants24, 38, 39. Accordingly, landforms and associated soil moisture patterns35, 40, 41, as well as vegetation cover35, 42 have previously been shown to correlate with plant or soil δ15N. This indicates that variation of δ15N in heterogeneous landscapes can potentially be predicted from LiDAR-derived land-surface attributes, thereby allowing us to disentangle spatial influences of invasive species on native species δ15N from background variation.

Here, we combine multi-scale and multi-source georeferenced spatial data into one joint model. We propose that integrating spatial mapping of plant species, functional tracers of plant-plant interactions and remotely sensed information on spatial variability within ecosystems can give new insights into the significance of environmental heterogeneity for the outcome of plant-plant interactions and for community functioning. The conceptual framework of this approach is outlined in Fig. 1.

Figure 1

Schematic illustrating how different layers of spatial information can be combined into one joint model to yield spatially explicit predictions of functional tracers. Potential predictors can include the distribution of key species (e.g. presence of an invasive plant species), structural information, or raster maps of abiotic environmental conditions. Data can be derived from field measurements or from remote sensing products. The functional tracer can, for example, be measured in the vegetation or in the soil and should be suitable for spatially explicit data acquisition. A – rate of photosynthetic carbon assimilation; g s – stomatal conductance; Φ PSII – maximum quantum efficiency of photosystem II; SLA – specific leaf area.

To test this framework, we modelled the spatial pattern of foliar δ15N as a functional tracer of the impact of an N2-fixing invasive species in a Mediterranean dune ecosystem. We hypothesized (1) that both, the presence of an N2-fixing plant invader as well as the inherent, spatially heterogeneous properties of the native system, i.e., site topography and vegetation cover, are important variables affecting δ15N of a non-fixing native species, (2) that using these variables as spatially explicit predictors, a model can be created that allows to predict spatial patterns of δ15N isoscapes on community scale, and (3) that such a model can reveal interactions between environmental heterogeneity and the outcome and spatial scales of plant-plant interactions.


Foliar δ15N of Corema album, as a functional tracer of N cycling and N input, showed an extraordinarily large range between −13.2 and 1.1‰ in the heterogeneous dune ecosystem, while δ15N of the N2-fixing Acacia longifolia was close to the atmospheric value of 0‰ with little variation (−1.6 ± 0.46‰, mean ± SD). The strong variation in C. album δ15N was modelled effectively using a generalized additive mixed model (GAMM), with remotely sensed attributes (such as topography and vegetation cover) and spatial relationships between individual plants (i.e. distance and elevation relative to the invader) as predictors. The model showed a good predictive ability as demonstrated by a good agreement between measured and predicted values (Fig. 2). The median R 2 was 0.6 (interquartile range (IQR): 0.57–0.64) and median RMSE was 1.82‰ (IQR: 1.72–1.89), as calculated based on test sets from 100 model runs with random data splits between training and test sets.

Figure 2

Measured foliar δ15N values of C. album versus δ15N values predicted by the additive mixed model for the training and the test set of the model which was closest to the median R 2 out of 100 model runs with random data splits. The 1:1-line is indicated.

In the model selection, the best model with an AICc weight of 0.73 included all fixed effects with the exception of the canopy extent of A. longifolia, while the second best model (AICc weight = 0.24) comprised the complete set of predictors (Table 1). For the distance to A. longifolia, the GAMM predicted an enrichment of δ15N by ca. 3‰ close to the canopy of the invader, with decreasing δ15N the larger the distance to the canopy (Fig. 3a). This relationship was highly non-linear (effective degrees of freedom = 4.36), with 15N enrichment being evident in a range of approximately 5–8 m from the canopy. The area of the A. longifolia canopies ranged from 8.3 to 564.7 m2. The smoother for the logarithm of the canopy area showed no clear patterns for the smallest A. longifolia individuals, but indicated a weak trend towards 15N enrichment in the neighbourhood of very large canopies, which accounted for approximately 1‰ increase (Fig. 3b). The elevation of C. album plants relative to A. longifolia was most important for individuals that grew downslope of A. longifolia (Fig. 3c). These plants were considerably 15N enriched compared to individuals growing at level with or above A. longifolia. Vegetation cover varied strongly across and within the study sites. While most C. album individuals grew at locations with sparse vegetation cover below 40%, patches with bare sand (0%) and with very dense vegetation (92%) also occurred. Vegetation cover accounted for substantial enrichment in C. album foliar δ15N of up to ca. 5‰ in the densest compared to the sparsest patches in this study (Fig. 3d). Furthermore, δ15N decreased linearly by ca. 4‰ with increasing topographic wetness index (TWI, Fig. 3e). Regarding the landform classification, valleys and drainages were most enriched in δ15N while plains were the most depleted landform class (Fig. 3f).

Table 1 Results of a model selection procedure, ranked by AICc, showing the four models with strongest support.
Figure 3

(a–e) Smoothing functions used by the generalized additive mixed model. Smoothers describe δ15N as a function of the respective predictor (lines) along with their 95% confidence intervals (grey shading) and partial residuals (points), which are the residuals for each predictor when all other predictors are held constant at their mean (continuous predictors) or at the most frequent class (for factors). (f) Effect of the categorical predictor landform classes.

Supplementary Fig. S1 shows the predictions for the individual transects, using only the fixed effects. The predicted values fitted the measured data in many cases, while notably, even where deviations (due to random effects) were evident, in general the model still succeeded to reproduce the general trend in the data (Supplementary Fig. S1).

With the validated model and all of the predictors being available as raster maps, it was then possible to create predictive isoscapes for the surroundings of mapped A. longifolia individuals. As an example, Fig. 4 illustrates the additive effects of three important predictors (topographic wetness index, distance to A. longifolia, and vegetation cover) for one of the study sites (Pinheiro da Cruz; see Supplementary Figs S2S5 for the other sites). Considering solely the spatial variation of one predictor at a time, while keeping all others constant, indicates that all predictors affected the predictions of C. album foliar δ15N, but to different degrees and resulting in different spatial patterns (Fig. 4d–f). While the isolated effect of A. longifolia presence created a regular pattern surrounding its canopies, the combination with the topographic wetness index (Fig. 4g) or with vegetation cover (Fig. 4h) considerably increased the range and the patchiness of δ15N predictions. The interplay of all three variables (Fig. 4i) generated the largest spatial variation, with highest predicted δ15N values at locations where proximity to A. longifolia, low topographic wetness index and high vegetation cover coincided (Fig. 4g–i). Particularly strong depletion in δ15N was evident at locations where the topographic wetness index was high (Fig. 4d,g,i).

Figure 4

Model simulations illustrating the additive effects of three selected spatially explicit predictors on model estimates for the study site Pinheiro da Cruz. (a–c) Raster maps of the predictors TWI (topographic wetness index), dist (distance to the closest Acacia longifolia canopy) and cover (log(vegetation cover +1)) are shown. Black outlines demarcate A. longifolia canopies. (d–i) Model simulations of Corema album foliar δ15N using a generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) with six predictors (including TWI, dist and cover, see Methods section for details). Predictors specified in the panel heading are included with their original spatial variation while all other predictors are held constant at their mean (for continuous predictors) or at the most frequent class (for factors). First, only one predictor was used with its original variation, with all other variables held constant (d–f), second, additive effects of two original predictors are illustrated (g,h), and finally, (i) shows the combined effect when taking into account the spatial variation of three predictors.

Figure 5 shows predicted δ15N isoscapes for all study sites, using the complete set of predictors with their original spatial variation. The isoscapes revealed considerable variation of δ15N at small spatial scales, with changes of up to 5‰ at a distance of 10 m (Fig. 5). At the different sites, the prominent effect of vegetation cover in the native system was most obvious. For instance, at Lagoa da Sancha, a sharp change between bare sand and dense vegetation caused a strong and rapid enrichment in predicted δ15N (Fig. 5e), while values were generally very depleted wherever vegetation cover was low. Enriched δ15N values were found close to A. longifolia canopies, with particularly high enrichment where A. longifolia presence concurred with high vegetation cover (Fig. 5d,e). Furthermore, even small individuals of the invader occasionally affected extended areas that stretched downslope, as for example in Praia do Pego and Pinheiro da Cruz (Fig. 5b,e). This reflected the interaction between site topography and presence of A. longifolia, which indicated the strong effect on δ15N of C. album individuals growing down-slope of the invader (Fig. 3c). Hence, the modelling results suggested that strong spatial variation of foliar δ15N was the integrated result of the invader impact and the distinct spatial patterns of heterogeneous environmental factors.

Figure 5

(a–e) Predicted δ15N isoscapes for Corema album foliage at the five study sites. Acacia longifolia canopies (grey hatching) and sampled transects of C. album (points) are indicated. In the background, aerial images of the study sites are shown with the exception of (b), where no high-resolution aerial image was available and vegetation cover is displayed instead.


Combining spatially explicit information of environmental, structural and functional effects into one joint community-scale model offers new perspectives to advance our understanding of the dynamics of plant-plant interactions in heterogeneous plant-soil systems. Specifically, using stable isotopes as powerful tracers, field-scale isoscape models can add a novel dimension to community ecology43. Here, by taking the invasion of an N2-fixing invasive acacia in a nutrient-poor dune ecosystem as an example, we present the first model that can predict small-scale spatial variation of foliar δ15N, as a spatial tracer of N cycling and N input, from observed geospatial data. Modelling 15N isoscapes of a non-fixing native species as a function of vegetation cover, variables related to site topography and locations of the invasive A. longifolia revealed modulating effects of heterogeneous environments on invader impact. This clearly emphasizes that the influence of an invasive species has to be considered within its spatial context. In fact, impact assessment may be biased when processes potentially interacting with invader influence – and their spatial dimension – are not accounted for.

The model predicted foliar δ15N with high precision and accuracy (Fig. 2) and effectively retraced pronounced small scale patterns along transects in the heterogeneous environment (Supplementary Fig. S1). Our approach demonstrated that the large spatial variation in the functional tracer can be explained by the interplay of plant-plant interactions and patchy environmental conditions (Figs 3 and 4). We identified three main controls of δ15N in the native system: vegetation cover, topographic wetness index and landform class. Generally, δ15N of ecosystems can be influenced by changes in the balance of N input vs. output and fractionation, with potentially large effects of N losing processes24, 38, 39. As increasing rates of N transformations and N losses are typically linked to soil moisture, and as topography is an important control of hydrological processes, correlations between topographic position and δ15N of non-fixing plants across landscapes in different ecosystems have been attributed to moisture-related patterns of mineralization, nitrification and denitrification (e.g. refs 35, 40 and 41). In our study, we used a landform classification to characterize the topographic position relative to its surrounding for each individual plant as well as a topographic wetness index as a proxy for soil moisture. In line with the literature, plants growing in drainages and valleys showed more enriched δ15N values compared to plants from plains, slopes and ridges (Fig. 3f). However, according to the topographic wetness index, moisture – as affected by topography – apparently was not the driving factor in enriching δ15N. In contrast, we found a negative relationship between the wetness index and δ15N (Fig. 3e), indicating a decoupling of the effects of landform and topographically controlled moisture in this well-drained sand dune ecosystem. Here, foliar δ15N could be affected by landform class, e.g., via relationships with soil texture and organic matter content22 or plant litter accumulation in topographic depressions44.

The strong negative relationship between the topographic wetness index and δ15N in our study (Fig. 3e) cannot be explained by altered rates of N transformations and N loss, as these would typically increase with increasing soil moisture and lead to enrichment of residual δ15N. Beside N-transformation processes, mycorrhizal association is known to strongly affect plant δ15N values, with ericoid mycorrhiza potentially causing substantial depletion38, 45, and the influence may additionally be modulated by N availability45, 46. As mycorrhizal fungi are considered particularly influential in nutrient limited systems28, and for species without permanent access to ground water as C. album 47, their impact in this dune ecosystem can be expected to be large and variable within the heterogeneous environment. Thus, one hypothesis explaining the influence of the topographic wetness index could be that soil moisture affects foliar δ15N by controlling fungal N retention or N supply to the plant.

Vegetation cover accounted for high variation in δ15N of up to 5‰ between the lowest and the highest cover values, with strong δ15N enrichment at densely covered sites (Fig. 3d). A comparable enriching effect of vegetation cover on foliar δ15N was also found in Brazilian white-sand vegetation42 and, based on NDVI, in a semi-arid ecosystem35. Vegetation cover and root systems modify physical conditions in the soil, such as humidity and temperature, as well as organic matter content, nutrient availability and microbial activity4, 36, 37, 48. Therefore, patchy vegetation can increase spatial heterogeneity through multiple feedbacks on soil properties and processes, such as protection from erosion, higher soil infiltration and water-holding capacity, larger soil C and N pools and higher microbial activity as well as by constituting sinks for runoff, sediment and nutrients (ref. 35 and references therein).

In conjunction, landform class, topographically controlled wetness and vegetation cover create a mosaic of microsites where the activity of N transforming processes and the effects of mycorrhiza may vary significantly, but fairly predictably. Acacia longifolia invades the total range of microsites in this system, additionally influencing the native vegetation. An earlier study showed that δ15N enrichment of C. album in the surrounding of A. longifolia canopies indicates input of N with an isotopic signature close to 0‰ that originates from symbiotic fixation of atmospheric N2 21. Such an enrichment with N and alterations of nutrient pools and cycling49,50,51 has cascading effects on the recipient community, modifying soil microbial communities52 and negatively affecting native seedling diversity53, 54. For A. longifolia, being a strong competitor for water55 and nutrients56, theses alterations likely function as a self-facilitation mechanism, with A. longifolia showing a greater responsiveness to N addition compared to native species57, 58. Furthermore, the increase in soil N has persistent effects even after eradication and may create a positive feed-back loop promoting secondary invasions59.

The spatial influence of N-addition extends beyond the canopy by several meters, as revealed by an isoscapes approach12, 21, 30. However, the suitability of δ15N as a reliable tracer of N sources in heterogeneous natural ecosystems has been questioned due to the multitude of processes affecting δ15N25, 39. Here we show that the effect of N input by A. longifolia can be disentangled from further controls of δ15N in the native system, by accounting for topographic attributes and vegetation cover in a generalized additive mixed model that allows modelling multiple effects that may be highly nonlinear. Therefore, by enabling inferences and predictions of plant functional attributes on a spatially explicit scale, such models can illustrate the dependence of spatial patterns in plant-plant interactions on heterogeneous conditions. In the case of A. longifolia invasion, the model can be useful to evaluate the susceptibility of different microsites to invader influence and to identify priority sites for management. For example, we found much stronger effects where A. longifolia was located higher, i.e. upslope of the native vegetation (Fig. 3c), indicating that management of individuals or stands of the invader at these topographic positions should be prioritized.

The pronounced spatial heterogeneity of δ15N that we found within sites challenges the concept of high or low “invasibility” of specific systems15. Similar to the fluctuating resource hypothesis14 and the concept of niche opportunities16, which basically predict spatio-temporal patterns of invasion, e.g., due to disturbance, invasibility as well as invader impact must be expected to vary on small spatial scales even in the absence of disturbance60. Moreover, synergistic effects between fluctuations in resources availability and invader resource use can amplify invader impact and result into cascading effects on native vegetation61. Such interdependence between invader success or impact and the heterogeneous environment adds another dimension to the recently proposed concept of ‘invasion syndromes’62, which points out the significance of context dependency and species × ecosystem interactions for invasion dynamics62, 63.

Our geospatial method is suitable to integrate processes across scales, from local interaction neighbourhood to community and even landscape scales. Thus it can provide a framework that is needed to test the effect of heterogeneity on invasibility as well as to quantify invader-driven heterogeneity, including feedbacks between ecosystem engineers and spatially structured habitats.

Therefore, studies which combine ecophysiological indicators with remote sensing provide new opportunities to develop and test spatially explicit theory and models. Remotely sensed information is increasingly available at higher spatial resolution and current research continues to establish links between remote sensing products and ecological and physiological processes (e.g. refs 64,65,67). It has even been shown that foliar δ15N can be resolved with spectroscopic field measurements68. By integrating LiDAR-derived information on surface features with stable isotopes as an ecological tracer, our study strengthens this line of research. Moreover, it clearly indicates that spatial variation should be considered as an important factor at the community scale, when studying plant-plant interactions and specifically invader impacts.

In summary, predictive isoscapes, after careful validation, serve to identify controls of spatial variation and to map heterogeneity in ecological processes as well as to quantify and predict the spatial influence of invasive species. Including spatially explicit information, e.g. on topography and vegetation cover, will improve inferences from and predictions of isoscapes. Moreover, linking remote sensing techniques with tracers of biological processes will facilitate and advance the inclusion of spatial processes in ecological theory from small to large spatial scales.


Field Site

We sampled at five sites along a coastal strip of ca. 30 km length at the Atlantic coast of Southwest Portugal (38.18°N, 8.78°W), between the towns of Comporta and Sínes. Climate is Mediterranean, with dry summers and moist winters. Soils are arenosols (FAO classification) with poor water retention capacity and low nutrient availability (see ref. 54). Vegetation cover is low and typically consists of a diverse community of small dwarf shrubs, including Corema album (L.) D. Don (Ericaceae), and trees. The area is invaded by the exotic N2-fixing Acacia longifolia (Andrews) Willd. (Fabaceae), a large shrub or small tree, which forms extensive, very dense monospecific thickets in the dune system53.

C. album is an endemic species in the sand dune ecosystems of the Iberian Peninsula, which is well-adapted to the nutrient-poor conditions. Foliar nitrogen content of C. album is typically very low (e.g. refs 54 and 69), with extraordinarily depleted δ15N values that are characteristic for non-fixing species in this strongly N-limited system30 and in particular for the ericacean C. album 12, 21, 54. Therefore, C. album has proven a suitable indicator species to measure the impact of N input by the N2-fixing invasive A. longifolia 12, 21, 54.

Leaf sampling

At the five sites, in total eight plots were established. Each plot contained one central A. longifolia canopy consisting of one and sometimes two to several inseparable A. longifolia individuals, from which four transects of ca. 20 m length were laid out in the four cardinal directions. Along each transect, current year, fully expanded, healthy sunlit leaves of on average 13 ± 3 (mean ± SD) C. album plants were sampled in August 2013. In one plot, only three transects could be sampled because of a lack of C. album individuals in one direction. Overall, 450 plants were sampled. Additionally, phyllodes of the central A. longifolia and of any other large individual in the surrounding were collected. Locations of A. longifolia canopies (polygons) and C. album plants (points) were recorded using a differential GPS (GeoXH, with a Tornado GA810 Antenna, Trimble, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The GPS positions were post-processed using reference data from the closest permanent reference station of the Portuguese Direção-Geral do Território in Santiago do Cacém, Portugal. 95% of the measured points were corrected using the GPS carrier phase with an average accuracy of 0.12 m ± 0.08 m. The remaining points were corrected using the code phase (4% of the points, 0.60 m ± 0.49 m) or SBAS (Satellite-based Augmentation System) real time correction (1% of the points, 0.58 m ± 0.10 m).

Isotope analysis

Samples were oven-dried at 65 °C for at least 48 hours and ground to a fine powder using a ball-mill (Retsch, Haan, Germany). Nitrogen isotope ratios were analysed in an Elemental Analyser (HEKAtech GmbH, Weinberg, Germany) coupled to a continuous flow stable isotope ratio mass spectrometer (ISOPRIME, Elementar, Hanau, Germany). Measurements were related to IAEA-N-1 and IAEA-N-2 standards (International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria) and a laboratory standard (IVA33802156, IVA Analysetechnik e.K., Meerbusch, Germany). Isotopic values are expressed in δ notation referenced to the international IAEA standard of air. Repeated measurement precision was 0.2‰.

LiDAR products

LiDAR (Light Detection And Ranging) data of the study area were acquired with a Leica ALS50-II (Leica Geosystems AG, Heerbrugg, Switzerland) in a flight campaign on April 7, 2011. Average point density was 4.5 points × m−2 with an average point spacing of 0.64 m. Multiple Pulse in Air (MPiA) was up to 4 returns. The LiDAR point cloud was scanned for noisy data and ground points were identified to produce a digital elevation model (DEM) with a cell resolution of 1 × 1 m using LAStools (version 141013, rapidlasso GmbH, Gilching, Germany). Relative vegetation cover was computed as the ratio of non-ground points to ground points and filtered with a six cell radius.

Spatially explicit predictors

To model δ15N of C. album, raster maps of six spatially explicit predictors were prepared for each study site. As N input by A. longifolia has been found to influence δ15N values of C. album, a raster map containing the distance of each cell to the closest A. longifolia canopy larger than 6 m2 was created. Additionally, as larger A. longifolia canopies are assumed to have a larger influence, raster maps specifying the area of the closest A. longifolia canopy were generated. The vertical position of C. album relative to A. longifolia might further modify its effect on δ15N. Therefore, the elevation difference to the closest A. longifolia canopy was calculated for each raster cell.

To account for possible effects of soil moisture, the topographic wetness index (TWI) was calculated in SAGA GIS 2.2.370 as ln(a/tanβ), where a is the cumulative upslope area draining through a cell per unit contour length, and β is the local slope71. The topographic wetness index has previously been shown to correlate with soil moisture in a coastal dune field72. In SAGA GIS, we ran the TWI toolchain using a Multiple Flow Direction model and the resulting raster was smoothed with a mean filter using a four cell radius to reduce noise.

Furthermore, as the topographic position of a plant could influence its δ15N, a landform classification was performed based on a topographic position index (TPI) according to Weiss73. The TPI is computed as the difference between the elevation of each cell and the mean elevation for all cells of a moving circular window centred on the cell of interest74. Thus, the TPI can be used to identify landforms within a local neighbourhood, i.e., positive values indicate that the cell is higher than its surroundings and negative values mean that it is lower, while values close to 0 can indicate either a plain or a mid-slope position. The landform classification73 uses the slope to distinguish between plains and mid-slope positions. The TPI was calculated in SAGA GIS 2.2.3 on the smoothed digital elevation model (mean filter, five cell radius) and using a minimum radius of 10 m and a maximum radius of 100 m. Subsequently, several of the original classes proposed by Weiss73 were merged, as some classes had few members or values were similar due to the relatively small spatial extent. The final classes were: ridges, slopes, plains, drainages and valleys (containing valleys and “streams”).

The size of the raster images at each study site was chosen such that they covered a buffer of 100 m radius surrounding the outmost individuals mapped at each site, which resulted in raster images of ca. 6.1–14.8 ha. Spatial resolution was 1 m, according to the resolution of the LiDAR-derived digital elevation model.

From the above raster images, values were extracted at the locations of each C. album individual from which foliage was sampled. This dataset was then used to fit a model of foliar δ15N of C. album. For the area of the closest A. longifolia canopy and for vegetation cover, the logarithm was used to approximate normal distributions.

Statistical analysis

Foliar δ15N of C. album was modelled using a generalized additive mixed model (GAMM). Generalized additive models provide a flexible statistical means to identify and characterize non-linear regression effects by replacing some or all of the linear terms of the ordinary generalized models by non-parametric smoothing functions75. Generalized additive mixed models can additionally handle random effects76.

The generalized additive mixed model was fitted in R 3.3.077 with the gamm4 package78, using the Gaussian family with identity link function and thin-plate spline smooths. Fixed factors of the model were the parametric term landform class (5 levels) and smoothers for the following continuous variables: log(vegetation cover +1), distance to the closest A. longifolia canopy, log(area of the closest A. longifolia canopy), elevation relative to the target A. longifolia and TWI. Random intercepts were included for each transect nested in the eight plots. Models were fitted with maximum likelihood estimation. To assess model accuracy, the model was run 100 times, each time randomly assigning 75% of the data to a training set and 25% to a test set. The fit of predicted vs. measured values for the test sets was evaluated. A final model was then fitted using all samples. Normal distribution and homoscedasticity of the residuals was verified visually with diagnostic plots. The absence of spatial autocorrelation of the model residuals was confirmed by computing experimental semivariograms and Moran’s I correlograms (Supplementary Figs S6, S7). The relevance of the model terms was assessed in a model selection procedure by minimizing the AICc (Akaike Information Criterion with finite sample correction) using the function dredge from the R package MuMIn79. Finally, predictive δ15N isoscapes based on the spatially continuous raster maps of the predictors were created at the five sampled sites. Predictions were performed in R using the predict function of the raster package80 and were restricted to the maximum distance to A. longifolia in the training data.

Data availability statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available in the figshare repository, 10.6084/m9.figshare.4959881.


  1. 1.

    Tilman, D. On the meaning of competition and the mechanisms of competitive superiority. Funct. Ecol. 1, 304–315 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tamme, R., Hiiesalu, I., Laanisto, L., Szava-Kovats, R. & Partel, M. Environmental heterogeneity, species diversity and co-existence at different spatial scales. J. Veg. Sci. 21, 796–801 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Stein, A., Gerstner, K. & Kreft, H. Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 17, 866–880 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Wardle, D. A. et al. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota. Science 304, 1629–1633 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ehrenfeld, J. G., Ravit, B. & Elgersma, K. Feedback in the plant-soil system. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30, 75–115 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Callaway, R. M. & Walker, L. R. Competition and facilitation: A synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78, 1958–1965 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bertness, M. D. & Callaway, R. Positive interactions in communities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9, 191–193 (1994).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Maestre, F. T., Callaway, R. M., Valladares, F. & Lortie, C. J. Refining the stress-gradient hypothesis for competition and facilitation in plant communities. J. Ecol 97, 199–205 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Soliveres, S., Smit, C. & Maestre, F. T. Moving forward on facilitation research: response to changing environments and effects on the diversity, functioning and evolution of plant communities. Biol. Rev. 90, 297–313 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dickie, I. A., Schnitzer, S. A., Reich, P. B. & Hobbie, S. E. Spatially disjunct effects of co-occurring competition and facilitation. Ecol. Lett. 8, 1191–1200 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Berger, U., Piou, C., Schiffers, K. & Grimm, V. Competition among plants: Concepts, individual-based modelling approaches, and a proposal for a future research strategy. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 9, 121–135 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Hellmann, C., Rascher, K. G., Oldeland, J. & Werner, C. Isoscapes resolve species-specific spatial patterns in plant–plant interactions in an invaded Mediterranean dune ecosystem. Tree Physiol. 36, 1460–1470 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Hobbs, R. J. & Huenneke, L. F. Disturbance, diversity, and invasion: Implications for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 6, 324–337 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Davis, M. A., Grime, J. P. & Thompson, K. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J. Ecol. 88, 528–534 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lonsdale, W. M. Global patterns of plant invasions and the concept of invasibility. Ecology 80, 1522–1536 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Shea, K. & Chesson, P. Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 170–176 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Dawson, T. E., Mambelli, S., Plamboeck, A. H., Templer, P. H. & Tu, K. P. Stable isotopes in plant ecology. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 33, 507–559 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    West, J. B., Bowen, G. J., Cerling, T. E. & Ehleringer, J. R. Stable isotopes as one of nature’s ecological recorders. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 408–414 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Werner, C. et al. Progress and challenges in using stable isotopes to trace plant carbon and water relations across scales. Biogeosciences 9, 3083–3111 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    West, J. B., Sobek, A. & Ehleringer, J. R. A simplified GIS approach to modeling global leaf water isoscapes. PLoS ONE 3, e2447 (2008).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Rascher, K. G., Hellmann, C., Máguas, C. & Werner, C. Community scale 15N isoscapes: tracing the spatial impact of an exotic N2-fixing invader. Ecol. Lett 15, 484–491 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Bai, E., Boutton, T. W., Liu, F., Wu, X. B. & Archer, S. R. 15N isoscapes in a subtropical savanna parkland: spatial-temporal perspectives. Ecosphere 4, 1–17 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Nitzsche, K. N., Verch, G., Premke, K., Gessler, A. & Kayler, Z. E. Visualizing land-use and management complexity within biogeochemical cycles of an agricultural landscape. Ecosphere 7, e01282 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Högberg, P. Tansley Review No. 95 15N natural abundance in soil-plant systems. New Phytol. 137, 179–203 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Robinson, D. δ15N as an integrator of the nitrogen cycle. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 153–162 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kleinebecker, T. et al. Evidence from the real world: 15N natural abundances reveal enhanced nitrogen use at high plant diversity in Central European grasslands. J. Ecol. 102, 456–465 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Handley, L. L. & Raven, J. A. The use of natural abundance of nitrogen isotopes in plant physiology and ecology. Plant Cell Environ 15, 965–985 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hobbie, E. & Hobbie, J. Natural abundance of 15N in nitrogen-limited forests and tundra can estimate nitrogen cycling through mycorrhizal fungi: A review. Ecosystems 11, 815–830 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Stahl, V. M., Beyschlag, W. & Werner, C. Dynamic niche sharing in dry acidic grasslands -a 15N-labeling experiment. Plant Soil 344, 389–400 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hellmann, C., Werner, C. & Oldeland, J. A spatially explicit dual-isotope approach to map regions of plant-plant interaction after exotic plant invasion. PLOS ONE 11, e0159403 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bowen, G. J. Isoscapes: Spatial pattern in isotopic biogeochemistry. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 38, 161–187 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Pardo, L. H. & Nadelhoffer, K. J. Using nitrogen isotope ratios to assess terrestrial ecosystems at regional and global scales in Isoscapes (eds West, J. B., Bowen, G. J., Dawson, T. E. & Tu, K. P.) 221–249 (Springer Netherlands, 2010).

  33. 33.

    Lefsky, M. A., Cohen, W. B., Parker, G. G. & Harding, D. J. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. Bioscience 52, 19–30 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ruiz-Navarro, A., Barberá, G. G., García-Haro, J. & Albaladejo, J. Effect of the spatial resolution on landscape control of soil fertility in a semiarid area. J. Soils Sediments 12, 471–485 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Ruiz-Navarro, A., Barberá, G. G., Albaladejo, J. & Querejeta, J. I. Plant δ15N reflects the high landscape-scale heterogeneity of soil fertility and vegetation productivity in a Mediterranean semiarid ecosystem. New Phytol. 212, 1030–1043 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Dawson, T. E. Hydraulic lift and water-use by plants - implications for water-balance, performance and plant-plant interactions. Oecologia 95, 565–574 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Finzi, A. C., Van Breemen, N. & Canham, C. D. Canopy tree–soil interactions within temperate forests: Species effects on soil carbon and nitrogen. Ecol. Appl. 8, 440–446 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Craine, J. M. et al. Global patterns of foliar nitrogen isotopes and their relationships with climate, mycorrhizal fungi, foliar nutrient concentrations, and nitrogen availability. New Phytol. 183, 980–992 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Craine, J. M. et al. Ecological interpretations of nitrogen isotope ratios of terrestrial plants and soils. Plant Soil 396, 1–26 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sutherland, R. A., van Kessel, C., Farrell, R. E. & Pennock, D. J. Landscape-scale variations in plant and soil nitrogen-15 natural abundance. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 169–178 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Bai, E. et al. Spatial variation of the stable nitrogen isotope ratio of woody plants along a topoedaphic gradient in a subtropical savanna. Oecologia 159, 493–503 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Mardegan, S., Nardoto, G., Higuchi, N., Moreira, M. & Martinelli, L. Nitrogen availability patterns in white-sand vegetations of Central Brazilian Amazon. Trees - Struct. Funct. 23, 479–488 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Cheesman, A. W. & Cernusak, L. A. Isoscapes: a new dimension in community ecology. Tree Physiol. 36, 1456–1459 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Facelli, J. M. & Pickett, S. T. A. Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure. Bot. Rev. 57, 1–32 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Hobbie, E. A. & Högberg, P. Nitrogen isotopes link mycorrhizal fungi and plants to nitrogen dynamics. New Phytol. 196, 367–382 (2012).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Hobbie, E. A. & Colpaert, J. V. Nitrogen availability and colonization by mycorrhizal fungi correlate with nitrogen isotope patterns in plants. New Phytol. 157, 115–126 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Álvarez-Cansino, L., Zunzunegui, M., Díaz Barradas, M. C. & Esquivias, M. P. Physiological performance and xylem water isotopic composition underlie gender-specific responses in the dioecious shrub Corema album. Physiol. Plant. 140, 32–45 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Bronick, C. J. & Lal, R. Soil structure and management: a review. Geoderma 124, 3–22 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Marchante, E., Kjøller, A., Struwe, S. & Freitas, H. Short- and long-term impacts of Acacia longifolia invasion on the belowground processes of a Mediterranean coastal dune ecosystem. Appl. Soil Ecol. 40, 210–217 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Marchante, E., Kjøller, A., Struwe, S. & Freitas, H. Soil recovery after removal of the N2-fixing invasive Acacia longifolia: consequences for ecosystem restoration. Biol. Invasions 11, 813–823 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Ulm, F., Hellmann, C., Cruz, C. & Máguas, C. N/P imbalance as a key driver for the invasion of oligotrophic dune systems by a woody legume. Oikos, doi:10.1111/oik.03810 (2016).

  52. 52.

    Rodríguez-Echeverría, S. Rhizobial hitchhikers from Down Under: invasional meltdown in a plant-bacteria mutualism? J. Biogeogr. 37, 1611–1622 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Rascher, K. G., Große-Stoltenberg, A., Máguas, C., Meira-Neto, J. & Werner, C. Acacia longifolia invasion impacts vegetation structure and regeneration dynamics in open dunes and pine forests. Biol. Invasions 13, 1099–1113 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Hellmann, C. et al. Impact of an exotic N2-fixing Acacia on composition and N status of a native Mediterranean community. Acta Oecologica 37, 43–50 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Rascher, K. G., Máguas, C., Große-Stoltenberg, A. & Werner, C. Understory invasion of A. longifolia in a Mediterranean pine forest negatively affects the water use and carbon assimilation rates of native trees. Ecosystems 14, 904–919 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Werner, C., Zumkier, U., Beyschlag, W. & Máguas, C. High competitiveness of a resource demanding invasive acacia under low resource supply. Plant Ecol. 206, 83–96 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Peperkorn, R., Werner, C. & Beyschlag, W. Phenotypic plasticity of an invasive acacia versus two native Mediterranean species. Funct. Plant Biol. 32, 933–944 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Werner, C., Peperkorn, R., Máguas, C. & Beyschlag, W. Competitive balance between the alien invasive Acacia longifolia and native Mediterranean species in Plant Invasions: Human perception, ecological impacts and management (eds Tokarska-Guzik, B. et al.) 261–275 (Backhuys Publishers, 2008).

  59. 59.

    Marchante, H., Marchante, E., Freitas, H. & Hoffmann, J. H. Temporal changes in the impacts on plant communities of an invasive alien tree. Acacia longifolia. Plant Ecol. 216, 1481–1498 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Melbourne, B. A. et al. Invasion in a heterogeneous world: resistance, coexistence or hostile takeover? Ecol. Lett. 10, 77–94 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Caldeira, M. C. et al. Synergy of extreme drought and shrub invasion reduce ecosystem functioning and resilience in water-limited climates. Sci. Rep 5, 15110 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Kueffer, C., Pyšek, P. & Richardson, D. M. Integrative invasion science: model systems, multi-site studies, focused meta-analysis and invasion syndromes. New Phytol. 200, 615–633 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Thiele, J., Kollmann, J., Markussen, B. & Otte, A. Impact assessment revisited: improving the theoretical basis for management of invasive alien species. Biol. Invasions 12, 2025–2035 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Sims, D. A. & Gamon, J. A. Relationships between leaf pigment content and spectral reflectance across a wide range of species, leaf structures and developmental stages. Remote Sens. Environ. 81, 337–354 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Dobrowski, S. Z., Pushnik, J. C., Zarco-Tejada, P. J. & Ustin, S. L. Simple reflectance indices track heat and water stress-induced changes in steady-state chlorophyll fluorescence at the canopy scale. Remote Sens. Environ. 97, 403–414 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Porcar-Castell, A. et al. Linking chlorophyll a fluorescence to photosynthesis for remote sensing applications: mechanisms and challenges. J. Exp. Bot. 65, 4065–4095 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Große-Stoltenberg, A., Hellmann, C., Werner, C., Oldeland, J. & Thiele, J. Evaluation of continuous VNIR-SWIR spectra versus narrowband hyperspectral indices to discriminate the invasive Acacia longifolia within a Mediterranean dune ecosystem. Remote Sens. 8, 334 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Hellmann, C., Große-Stoltenberg, A., Lauströer, V., Oldeland, J. & Werner, C. Retrieving nitrogen isotopic signatures from fresh leaf reflectance spectra: disentangling δ15N from biochemical and structural leaf properties. Front. Plant Sci. 6, 307 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Álvarez-Cansino, L., Barradas, M. C. D., Zunzunegui, M., Esquivias, M. P. & Dawson, T. E. Gender-specific variation in physiology in the dioecious shrub Corema album throughout its distributional range. Funct. Plant Biol. 39, 968–978 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Conrad, O. et al. System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4. Geosci. Model Dev 8, 1991–2007 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Beven, K. J. & Kirkby, M. J. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. J. 24, 43–69 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Kim, D. & Yu, K. B. A conceptual model of coastal dune ecology synthesizing spatial gradients of vegetation, soil, and geomorphology. Plant Ecol. 202, 135 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Weiss, A. D. Topographic position and landforms analysis (2000). Available at: www.jennessent.com/downloads/tpi-poster-tnc_18x22.pdf (Accessed: 1st September 2016).

  74. 74.

    Guisan, A., Weiss, S. B. & Weiss, A. D. GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution. Plant Ecol. 143, 107–122 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Hastie, T. J. & Tibshirani, R. J. Generalized additive models (CRC Press, 1990).

  76. 76.

    Lin, X. & Zhang, D. Inference in generalized additive mixed models by using smoothing splines. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Stat. Methodol. 61, 381–400 (1999).

    MathSciNet  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria (2016).

  78. 78.

    Wood, S. & Scheipl, F. gamm4: Generalized additive mixed models using mgcv and lme4. R package version 0.2–3 (2014).

  79. 79.

    Barton, K. MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 1.15.6 (2016).

  80. 80.

    Hijmans, R. J. raster: Geographic Data Analysis and Modeling. R package version 2.3–40 (2015).

Download references


Thanks to Cristina Máguas for logistical support, Ilse Thaufelder for technical assistance and Kerstin Hofmann for help in the field. We are grateful to the Instituto da Conservação da Natureza e das Florestas Portugal and the Estabelecimento Prisional de Pinheiro da Cruz for granting access to the field sites. We acknowledge helpful comments from Keisuke Koba and an anonymous referee. Funding for this project was provided by the DFG (OL 417/1-1, TH 1295/4-1, WE 2681/8-1), EUFAR (DeInVader, EUFAR11-06), LAStools (LASmoons grant to AGS) and “Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes” (Fellowship CH). The article processing charge was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the University of Freiburg in the funding programme Open Access Publishing.

Author information




C.H. designed the study with input from all other authors. C.H., A.G.S. and J.O. collected the data, A.G.S. processed LiDAR data, and C.H. and J.O. performed analyses. C.H. wrote the manuscript and developed the framework with C.W. and all authors contributed to revisions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christiane Werner.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hellmann, C., Große-Stoltenberg, A., Thiele, J. et al. Heterogeneous environments shape invader impacts: integrating environmental, structural and functional effects by isoscapes and remote sensing. Sci Rep 7, 4118 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04480-4

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing