Article | Open

MicroCT reveals domesticated rice (Oryza sativa) within pottery sherds from early Neolithic sites (4150–3265 cal BP) in Southeast Asia

  • Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 7410 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-04338-9
  • Download Citation
Received:
Accepted:
Published online:

Abstract

Rice (Oryza sativa) was domesticated in the Yangtze Valley region at least 6000–8000 years ago, yet the timing of dispersal of domesticated rice to Southeast Asia is contentious. Often rice is not well-preserved in archaeobotanical assemblages at early Neolithic sites in the wet tropics of Southeast Asia and consequently rice impressions in pottery have been used as a proxy for rice cultivation despite their uncertain taxonomic and domestication status. In this research, we use microCT technology to determine the 3D microscale morphology of rice husk and spikelet base inclusions within pottery sherds from early Neolithic sites in Vietnam. In contrast to surface impressions, microCT provides images of the entire husk and spikelet base preserved within the pottery, including the abscission scar characteristic of domesticated rice. This research demonstrates the potential of microCT to be a new, non-destructive method for the identification of domesticated plant remains within pottery sherds, especially in contexts where archaeobotanical preservation is poor and chaff-tempered sherds are rare and unavailable for destructive analysis. The method has the potential to greatly advance the understanding of crop domestication and agricultural dispersal for ceramic cultures in different parts of the world.

Introduction

During the domestication process rice (Oryza sativa), like other cereals, developed a non-shattering spikelet base to enable harvesting1, 2. The domesticated spikelet base has a diagnostic, vertically asymmetric, deeply recessed abscission scar visible in archaeobotanical assemblages that enables discrimination from wild rice3, 4. Rice was domesticated in the Yangtze River Valley region of China at least 6000–8000 years ago5, 6, yet the timing of dispersal of domesticated rice to Southeast Asia and its cultural associations are contentious7, 8.

The earliest domesticated rice (Oryza sativa) in Southeast Asia spread southward from its source region in China after 7000 cal BP potentially along with other Neolithic traits, such as cultivation practices, pottery and domesticated pigs, reaching Guangdong, Hainan and Taiwan by about 5500–5000 cal BP9,10,11. Archaeobotanical evidence for domesticated rice at early Neolithic sites in Southeast Asia is sparse, largely due to the poor preservation of macrobotanical remains in wet tropical climates and the inconsistent application of retrieval methods, as well as the uncertain taxonomic and domesticated status of microfossils12,13,14. Consequently, archaeological studies in the region have used rice impressions in pottery as a proxy for rice cultivation despite their uncertain taxonomic and domestication status12,13,14. This study sought to develop a new method to identify and determine the domestication status of rice remains within pottery efficiently and non-destructively.

The primary diagnostic criterion for the accurate discrimination of domesticated rice is the deeply recessed and asymmetric abscission scar at the base of spikelets characteristic of non-shattering cultivars3,4,5,6. MicroCT (where voxel size can be 1 µm or smaller) is a non-destructive method able to provide the 3D morphological and contextual detail to identify and visualise individual rice husks, spikelet bases and abscission scars for included organic material and impressions within pottery. In this study, pottery sherds from three archaeological sites in southern Vietnam were subjected to microCT analysis to determine if organic inclusions, or combusted impressions of organic inclusions, of domesticated rice (Oryza sativa) were present.

The archaeological sites date to the southern Vietnam Neolithic (Fig. 1): An Son to c.4200–3150 cal BP15, Loc Giang from at least 4000–3300 cal BP16 and Rach Nui to 3555–3265 cal BP17. Each site is an artificial mound averaging one hectare in extent, which rises 4–6 m above the surrounding alluvial or estuarine landscape, and contains artificially-laid floors with post-holes representing former timber constructions15,16,17,18,19,20. Habitation layers contain bones of domesticated pigs and dogs, together with decorated pottery, stone adzes and bone tools. An Son and Loc Giang have riverine locations, whereas Rach Nui is located in a mangrove-flanked estuary.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Map of Vietnam (right) with inset showing location of sites (left). Map created by Bellwood, P. & Piper, P. using Adobe Illustrator version CS5.

An Son and Loc Giang are currently the oldest excavated Neolithic sites in the greater Mekong region of southern Vietnam, dating to between c.4200 and 3200 cal BP. The stamped and incised pottery suggests widespread relationships with other regions of the Greater Mekong Basin, especially in Thailand, and ultimately with southern China18,19,20. Rach Nui is a slightly younger site, with cultural materials sufficiently different from those of An Son and Loc Giang (which have identical material cultures) to suggest occupation by a group with a different ethnic and economic orientation.

Sparse and often indeterminate evidence of rice has previously been reported for archaeobotanical and pottery assemblages from An Son, Loc Giang and Rach Nui. At An Son, a single rice husk was extracted from a poorly fired pottery sherd, which genetic analysis suggests is the domesticated species Oryza sativa ssp. japonica15. At Loc Giang, archaeobotanical research identified one domestic-type spikelet base, as well as multiple lines of evidence for rice of indeterminate domestication status, including husk impressions in pottery, two phytoliths and a charred rice husk. At Rach Nui, two domesticated spikelet bases and indeterminate rice husks were extracted from sediment samples17, 21.

Here, multiple imaging methods of varying scales and resolution were employed to detect inclusions or impressions within pottery sherds with the intention of identifying rice (Oryza spp.) and to positively discriminate between wild and domesticated rice (Oryza sativa) (Fig. 2). Sherds were described visually at the macro-scale (Fig. 2A), under optical microscope, SEM, X-ray and microCT. Optical microscopy (Fig. 2B) and SEM (Fig. 2C) provided detailed images of husk impressions within the pottery surface, yet these were not diagnostic of domesticated rice because these types of images are unable to capture the 3D morphological characteristics resulting from human selection, namely the recessed abscission scar22. Husk morphologies are insufficient to accurately differentiate potential wild rices growing in the natural environment from domesticated rice cultivated by people. Problematically, most current identifications of putatively domesticated rice in pottery are based on surficial impressions of husks in Southeast Asia23, 24 and their domestication status is thereby unsubstantiated.

Figure 2
Figure 2

(A) – Photograph of Sherd 1 (An Son) showing offcut used for tomographic imaging. (B) – Optical microscope image of rice impression on surface of Sherd 1. (C) – SEM image of rice impression on exposed cut surface of Sherd 1. (D) – Tomograph showing high-density, highly attenuated, clay fraction within offcut of Sherd 1. (E) – Tomograph showing mineral fraction within offcut of Sherd 1. (F) – Tomograph of low-density organic inclusions within offcut of Sherd 1. (G) – Tomograph of targeted rice husk fragment in offcut of Sherd 1, showing distinctive checkboard patterning of epidermis. (H) – Tomograph of rice spikelet base in offcut of Sherd 1, identified by positional relationship with husk fragments and recessed, irregular abscission scar. See Animations S1S5 for detail of Fig. 2D–G.

Sub-samples of each sherd were dissolved and processed to yield phytoliths of domesticated rice. However, no diagnostic rice phytoliths were identified in any sherd. Further, the discrimination of domesticated from wild rice using phytoliths is contentious, although increasingly used in East Asian research25,26,27.

A 1 cm off- cut from each pottery sherd was scanned at the ‘National Laboratory for X-ray Micro Computed Tomography (CTLab)’ based at the Australian National University (ANU) using a HeliScan MicroCT system to yield images at a resolution of 5–8 μm28, 29. MicroCT data for each sherd was rendered using Drishti v2.3.2 and Drishti Paint v.2.6 software30 to differentiate clay matrix from mineral and organic inclusions (Fig. 2D–F and Supplementary Animations S1–4) and to analyse morphological typography. Following digital isolation of the organic fraction within each sherd, individual organic inclusions of potential rice spikelet bases and husks were targeted for higher resolution processing. The resultant visualisations of individual rice husks (Supplementary Animations S5 and 6) and non-shattering spikelet bases (Supplementary Animations S79) were characteristic of domesticated rice in sherds from An Son and Loc Giang. Rice inclusions were not identified in sherds from Rach Nui, which contained mostly low-density non-organic inclusions, possibly reflecting mineral dissolution, and a seed-like inclusion with organic detail (Supplementary Animation S10).

The distinctive checkerboard patterning of the external surfaces of rice husks was clearly discernible in the optical (Fig. 2B) and SEM images (Fig. 2C), as well as the tomographs, of sherds from An Son and Loc Giang. MicroCT enabled high resolution visualisation of near-complete rice husks (Fig. 2G) and spikelet bases (Fig. 2H) within pottery sherds from these two sites, including a near-complete spikelet base with attached husk from Loc Giang (Fig. 3 & Supplmentary Animation S8). Spikelet base inclusions were compared to SEM reference images of domesticated, wild and immature rice spikelet bases (Fig. 4). All abscission scars on inclusions within pottery corresponded to the domesticated type, primarily due to irregular shape, concavity and size (Supplementary Animations 57).

Figure 3
Figure 3

(A) – Tomograph of offcut from Sherd 5, Loc Giang, showing organic component in green and position of rice husk (B) and attached spikelet base (C) in red (Animation S6). (B) – Front and side view of tomograph of rice husk and attached spikelet base in offcut of Sherd 5. (C) – Closeup of tomograph of spikelet base in Sherd 5, showing irregular, and recessed, abscission scar at base of near complete husk, as well as evidence of rachis pore (Animation S7). Recessed nature of scar shows that force was used to remove seed husk from plant rather than naturally occurring wind dispersal.

Figure 4
Figure 4

(A) – SEM image of domesticated-type rice spikelet base (from Fuller et al.4 Fig. 3G). (B) – Tomographic image of domesticated-type spikelet base in Sherd 3 from Loc Giang (Animation S8). (C) – Tomographic image of domesticated-type rice spikelet base in Sherd 1 from An Son (Animation S9).

The asynchronies between previous archaeobotanical data and the microCT analyses at these three sites may represent the vagaries of archaeological preservation of plant remains in the wet tropics. However, they may also indicate differences between communities cultivating and those importing domesticated rice. For instance, the absence of domestic rice inclusions within pottery made locally at Rach Nui, yet its reported presence in archaeobotanical assemblages there, may indicate people imported rice for consumption rather than growing it locally30. If grown locally, domesticated rice chaff, husks and spikelet bases would be expected to occur as temper within pottery made at the site. Anecdotally, local villagers there today suggest the estuarine environment was too saline to grow rice until recently. However, caution is needed as the limited application of modern tropical archaeobotanical methods in mainland Southeast Asia and the preliminary application of microCT to pottery assemblages precludes more refined interpretation.

In this study, microCT has been applied to positively discriminate domesticated rice inclusions within pottery sherds from two early Neolithic sites in Southeast Asia. The accurate study of rice inclusions and impressions within pottery opens up new possibilities for understanding the spread of domesticated rice from China to Vietnam and Thailand on mainland Southeast Asia, as well as Taiwan, the Philippines and Borneo in Island Southeast Asia. The dispersal of domesticated rice in Southeast Asia has previously been inferred using rice husk impressions in pottery or from phytoliths; although the accuracy of both methods for differentiating domesticated from wild rice is unclear. MicroCT is a reliable diagnostic technique for the discrimination of domesticated rice within pottery sherds and its application may be especially significant in the wet tropics where botanical preservation in archaeological contexts is often poor. The technique is non-destructive, thereby enabling the analysis of crop remains, as well as potentially other materials, within pottery at sites where only a few key sherds have been preserved, or for regions where archaeobotanical methods have not been systematically applied. Further, microCT offers broad potential for tracking the domestication of major crops in other regions, such as cereals and legumes in Africa and Southwest Asia, through the analysis of chaff-tempered pottery, as well as the subsequent dispersal of these crops.

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Hammer, K. Das domestikationssyndrom. Kulturpflanze 32, 11–34 (1984).

  2. 2.

    Harlan, J. R., De Wet, J. M. J. & Price, E. G. Comparative evolution of cereals. Evolution 27, 311–325 (1973).

  3. 3.

    Thompson, G. B. Archaeobotanical Investigations at Khok Phanom Di, Central Thailand (PhD). (ANU, 1992).

  4. 4.

    Fuller, D. Q. et al. The domestication process and domestication rate in rice: spikelet bases from the Lower Yangtze. Science 323, 1607–1610 (2009).

  5. 5.

    Fuller, D. Q. Pathways to Asian civilizations: tracing the origins and spread of rice and rice cultures. Rice 4, 78–92 (2011).

  6. 6.

    Deng, Z. et al. From early domesticated rice of the Middle Yangtze Basin to millet, rice and wheat agriculture: archaeobotanical macro-remains from Baligang, Nanyang Basin, Central China (6700–500 BC). PLOS ONE 10(10), e0139885, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139885 (2015).

  7. 7.

    Donohue, M. & Denham, T. Farming and language in Island Southeast Asia: reframing Austronesian history. Curr. Anthropol. 51, 223–256 (2010).

  8. 8.

    Barker, G. & Richards, M. B. Foraging–farming transitions in Island Southeast Asia. J. Archaeol. Method Th. 20, 256–280 (2013).

  9. 9.

    Silva, F. et al. Modelling the geographical origin of rice using the rice archaeological database. PLoS ONE 10(9), e0137024 (2014).

  10. 10.

    Bellwood, P. The checkered prehistory of rice movement southwards as a domesticated cereal–from the Yangzi to the Equator. Rice 4, 93–103 (2011).

  11. 11.

    Yang, X. et al. New radiocarbon evidence on early rice consumption and farming in South China. The Holocene 1–7 (in press).

  12. 12.

    Paz, V. Island Southeast Asia: Spread or Friction Zone ? in: Examining the Farming/language Dispersal Hypothesis (eds. Bellwood, P. & Renfrew, C.) 275–297 (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2002).

  13. 13.

    Castillo, C. & Fuller, D. Q. Still too fragmentary and dependent upon chance? Advances in the study of early Southeast Asian archaeobotany, in Fifty Years of Archaeology in Southeast Asia: Essays in Honour of Ian Glover (eds. Bellina, B., Bacus, E. A., Pryce, O. & Weissman C. J.) 91–111 (River Books, 2010).

  14. 14.

    Castillo, C. Rice in Thailand: The archaeobotanical contribution. Rice 4, 114–120, doi:10.1007/s12284-011-9070-2 (2011).

  15. 15.

    Tanaka, K. & Sato, Y. in Bellwood, P. et al. An Son and the Neolithic of southern Vietnam. Asian Perspectives 50, 144–175 (2011).

  16. 16.

    Piper, P. & Oxenham, M. Of prehistoric pioneers: the establishment of the first sedentary settlements in the Mekong Delta region of Southern Vietnam during the period 2000–1500 cal. BC in Living in the Landscape: Essays in Honour of Graeme Barker (eds. Boyle, K., Rabett, R. J. & Hunt, C. O.) 209–225 (McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2014).

  17. 17.

    Oxenham, M. F. et al. Emergence and diversification of the Neolithic in Southern Vietnam: insights from coastal Rach Nui. J. Island and Coastal Archaeol 10, 309–338 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Bellwood, P. Vietnam’s place in the prehistory of Eastern Asia – a multidisciplinary perspective on the Neolithic in Perspectives on the Archaeol. of Vietnam (ed. Reinecke, A.) 47–70 (German Archaeological Institute, 2015).

  19. 19.

    Sarjeant, C. Contextualising the Neolithic Occupation of Southern Vietnam. Terra Australis 42 (ANU, 2014).

  20. 20.

    Piper, P. J. et al. Loc Giang: A Neolithic settlement on the banks of the Vam Co Dong River, Southern Vietnam in regional context. Archaeol. Res. in Asia (in review).

  21. 21.

    Castillo, C. C., Fuller, D. Q., Piper, P. J., Bellwood, P. & Oxenham, M. Hunter-gatherer specialization in the Late Neolithic of southern Vietnam – the case of Rach Nui. Quatern. Int. 1–17 (in press).

  22. 22.

    Fuller, D. Q. Contrasting patterns in crop domestication and domestication rates: recent archaeobotanical insights from the old world. Anna. Bot-London 100, 903–924 (2007).

  23. 23.

    Snow, B. E., Shutler, R., Nelson, D. E., Vogel, J. S. & Southon, J. R. Evidence of early rice cultivation in the Philippines. Philippine Quarterly of Culture and Society 14, 3–11 (1986).

  24. 24.

    Vincent, B. Rice in pottery: new evidence for early rice cultivation in Thailand. Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistoric Association 23, 51–58 (2008).

  25. 25.

    Zhao, Z., Pearsall, D. M., Benfer, R. A. & Piperno, D. R. Distinguishing rice (Oryza sativa Poaceae) from wild Oryza species through phytolith analysis, II finalized method. Econ. Bot. 52, 134–145 (1998).

  26. 26.

    Gu, Y., Zhao, Z. & Pearsall, D. M. Phytolith morphology research on wild and domesticated rice species in East Asia. Quatern, Int. 287, 141–148 (2013).

  27. 27.

    Wu, Y., Jiang, L., Zheng, Y., Wang, C. & Zhao, Z. Morphological trend analysis of rice phytolith during the early Neolithic in the Lower Yangtze. J. Archaeol. Sci. 49, 326–331 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Latham, S., Varslot, T. & Sheppard, A. Automated registration for augmenting micro-CT 3D images. ANZIAM J. (CTAC 2008) 50, C534–C548 (2008).

  29. 29.

    Myers, G., Kingston, A., Varslot, T. & Sheppard, A. Extending reference scan drift correction to high-magnification high-cone-angle tomography. Opt. Lett. 36, 4809–4811 (2011).

  30. 30.

    Limaye, A. Drishti: a volume exploration and presentation tool. Proc. SPIE, Developments in X-Ray Tomography VIII, 8506 (2012).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia

    • Aleese Barron
    • , Peter Bellwood
    • , Philip Piper
    • , Elle Grono
    • , Rebecca Jones
    • , Marc Oxenham
    •  & Tim Denham
  2. National Laboratory for X-ray Computed Tomography, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia

    • Michael Turner
    •  & Levi Beeching
  3. Centre for Archaeological Studies, Southern Institute for Social Sciences, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

    • Nguyen Khanh Trung Kien
  4. Research School of Physics and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia

    • Tim Senden

Authors

  1. Search for Aleese Barron in:

  2. Search for Michael Turner in:

  3. Search for Levi Beeching in:

  4. Search for Peter Bellwood in:

  5. Search for Philip Piper in:

  6. Search for Elle Grono in:

  7. Search for Rebecca Jones in:

  8. Search for Marc Oxenham in:

  9. Search for Nguyen Khanh Trung Kien in:

  10. Search for Tim Senden in:

  11. Search for Tim Denham in:

Contributions

A.B. and T.D. devised the research, with advice from T.S., and wrote the paper, with contributions from P.B., P.P., E.G. and R.J. A.B. undertook the research, with assistance from M.T., L.B., T.S. and T.D. M.O., N.K., P.B., P.P., E.G. and R.J. provided pottery sherds for analysis. The research was funded by the Research School of Physics and Engineering, Australian National University and ARC FT150100420 to TD.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tim Denham.

Electronic supplementary material

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.