Abstract
Root-knot nematodes (RKN) represent extensive challenges to Cucurbitaceae crops. However, Cucumis metuliferus (Cm) is known to be resistant to Meloidogyne incognita (Mi) infections. Thus, analysis of differentially expressed genes may lead to a comprehensive gene expression profiling of the incompatible Cm-Mi interaction. In this study, the time-course transcriptome of Cm against Mi infection was monitored using RNA-Seq. More than 170000 transcripts were examined in Cm roots, and 2430 genes were subsequently identified as differentially expressed in response to Mi infection. Based on function annotation and orthologs finding, the potential mechanism of transcriptional factor, cytoskeleton, pathogen-related genes and plant hormone were assessed at the transcription level. A comparison of gene expression levels between Mi-infected Cm and cucumber plants revealed that cytoskeleton-related genes are key regulators of Cm resistance to Mi. We herein discuss the dual nature of cytoskeleton-related genes in the susceptibility and resistance of plant hosts to Mi. Our observations provide novel insights into the responses of Cm to Mi at the transcriptome level. The data generated in this study may be useful for elucidating the mechanism underlying resistance to RKNs in cucurbitaceous crops.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Plant–parasitic root-knot nematodes (RKNs) are among the most dispersed plant pathogens responsible for considerable yield loses lost in various economic crops, including rice, soybean, cucumber and so on1, 2. Once infected, the second-stage juvenile nematodes can migrate into host plant root cells, and manipulate the normal root physiology by secreting several so-called effectors. This ultimately results in the generation of a specialized nematode feeding site (NFS) consisting of four to eight root cells that have been converted into giant cells3. The giant cells are employed by RKN to divert plant nutrients to supply the metabolic energy necessary for RKN’s development. Concomitant with the formation of giant cell, the surrounding root tissue forms root gall, in which RKNs develop continuously and eventually become adults4.
The transformation of root cells into NFS structures induced by RKN is related to the complex physiological processes change of host plants. RKN has the ability to manipulate these processes for facilitating their invading. Recent studies indicates that RKN can usurp host plant cell cycle by inducing the genes associated with cell cycle such as cyclin-dependent kinase (CDKs)5. In RKN infection sites, XYLOGLUCAN ENDO-TRANSGLYCOSYLASE/HYDROLASE (XTHs) gene family, responsible for cell wall reinforcement, was induced, suggesting RKN can manipulate plant cell expansion6. RKN can also induce partial depolymerisation of the microtubule, suggesting RKN can regulate cytoskeleton of host plant7. On the other hands, when host plants perceive RKN, they can respond with a defense reaction against the invading RKN. An important defense response involves the induction of hormone pathways that play an important role in plant defense response against pathogen invading. For example, jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene (ET) pathways were induced at early time points in RKN-infected plants8. Auxin manipulation is known to be an important process during initiation and early development of NFS of sedentary plant-parasitic nematodes9. Salicylic acid (SA)-related genes are strongly induced in infected roots7, 10. It has been noted that crosstalk between various hormones also exists in the host plant response against pathogens9. Beside of hormones, transcription factors are involved in the host plant responses to RKN invading. Gene expression profiling of nematode-infected Arabidopsis roots and of feeding cell indicated that transcription factors are key contributors to regulate the genes expression of hosts infected by nematode11, 12. Jin et al., reported that two Arabidopsis bHLH transcription factor genes interact in planta and positively influence cyst nematode parasitism13. WRKY transcription factor encoding genes are known to be widely involved in plants responses to nematode infection. Knocking down the expression of WRKY23 resulted in lower infection of the cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii 14. WRKY2 was preferentially induced during incompatible interactions of pepper plants with RKN15. In addition, pathogenesis-related genes are also involved in RKN invading. For example, the expression of PR-1, PR-2 and PR-5, was induced in both roots and leaves of RKN infected plants16.
Several high-throughput methods have been employed to analyze host plant gene expression level changes induced by an RKN infection, including gene chip arrays, suppression subtractive hybridization libraries (SSH), and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq)17,18,19,20. Transcriptome analysis based on RNA-seq is now recognized as a powerful approach to detect large numbers of genes, and it has been used widely to study the interactions between RKNs and their hosts20. Transcriptional analyses of galls at 3 days after an infection with the Meloidogyne graminicola (Mg) revealed that some plant hormone biosynthesis and signaling pathways are activated17. Beneventi et al. described the crosstalk between hormones and reactive oxygen species based on transcriptome of RKN infected soybean roots18.
Cucumis species belong to the Cucurbitaceae family, which includes several economically important crops, such as cucumber, melon, and watermelon. Despite their economic importance, cultivated Cucurbitaceae plants have always been vulnerable to serious RKN infections because they lack the RKN resistance genes21. In contrast, several wild melon species are reportedly resistant to Mi 22, 23. Among the Mi-resistant Cucumis species, the African horned melon Cucumis metuliferus (Cm) is known to be highly resistant to Mi 21, 23. In this study, we carried out a transcriptome analysis of Cm infected by Mi to investigate the Mi-resistance mechanism. To our knowledge, this is the first study of the interactions between Cucurbitaceae plant and RKN using transcriptome data. It provides a new insight into the responses of Cucurbitaceae plant to RKN infection, which are expected to be highly useful for dissecting the nematode resistant mechanism of Cucurbitaceae plant.
Results
Mi infection and development in cucumber and Cm
In this study, we compared Mi development in the infected root tissues of Cm and cultivated cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) inbred line 9930 at 1, 3, 5, 7, 14, 28 and 42 days after infection (DAI). We observed that Mi can invaded the roots of both 9930 and Cm plants (Fig. 1A,B and Supplementary Fig. S1). However, there were significant differences (p < 0.01) between 9930 and Cm roots from 3 to 28 DAI regarding gall size, which reflects the ability of Mi to invade roots (Fig. 1C). We also observed a significant difference in nematode body width between 9930 and Cm plants from 5 to 28 DAI (Fig. 1D). The average body width was 369.5 μm for nematodes in 9930 plants at 28 DAI, which was almost 6-fold greater than that for nematodes in Cm plants (i.e., 68.8 μm) at the same time point. The hysteresis associated with Mi development in the infected roots was more apparent in Cm plants than in 9930 plants (Fig. 1A and B). At 14 DAI, most of Mi that penetrate in 9930 roots developed into J3/J4 stages, while most of Mi in infected Cm roots were still at their J2 stage. Consequently, the nematode body width differed significantly between 9930 (99.2 μm) and Cm (23.4 μm) plants. At 28 DAI, all Mi in 9930 roots were at J3/J4 stages while only a small number of Mi in Cm roots were at J3/J4 stages. At 42 DAI, we observed Mi spawning behavior in 9930 roots, which was in contrast to most of the Mi nematodes in Cm roots, which were still at the J2 stage. Our results indicate that Cm can inhibit Mi development better than 9930 plants.
De novo RNA-seq assembly and annotation of non-redundant unigenes
We constructed 12 cDNA libraries for RNA-seq analyses of uninfected Cm roots (control) and Mi-infected Cm roots at three time points (3, 14, and 28 DAI). The analyses were conducted with two biological replicates for each time point. A summary of the RNA-seq transcriptome data in the 12 libraries is provided in Table 1. On average, each library yielded 22 million high quality reads and roughly 4.48 GB of nucleotides. Because the whole-genome sequence of Cm is not available, the valid reads from the 12 libraries were merged for de novo assembly using trinity software. The assembly statistics are given in Table 2. A total of 178,059 transcripts longer than 200 bp were obtained. The total length of all the transcripts was approximately 157 Mb. The longest transcript for each locus was taken as the unigene, resulting in 138,390 unigenes with an average length of 680 bp. Functional annotation of the transcripts was performed using BLASTX searches against various public protein databases. Of the 178,059 transcripts, 88,965 (49.96%) matched to known protein sequences in the NR database, 60,156 (33.78%) matched sequences in SWISSPROT database, 41919(23.54%) in the KEGG database, 68838(38.67%) in the KOG database, 45785(25.71%) in the PFAM database. The expression levels of transcripts were obtained using RSEM package of the TRINITY software. Analyses of the transcript levels revealed that the results for the biological replicates were highly correlated (average 96.47%) at each time point (see Supplementary Fig. S2).
Identification and functional classification of differentially expressed unigenes
We identified differentially expressed unigenes (DEUs) by comparing the transcriptome data of the Mi-treated and control plants at the 3, 14, and 28 DAI time points. A total of 2430 DEUs were identified, most (2276/2430) of which were up-regulated (Supplementary Table S1). Of 2430 DEUs, 51 showed a differential expression pattern in 3d treatment, 900 in 14d treatment and 2255 in 28d treatment (Fig. 2A). The time series analysis suggested that the expression patterns of DEUs could be grouped into six clusters, with most (2051/2430) exhibiting higher expression levels in the Mi-treated plants than in the controls from 3 to 28 DAI (Fig. 2B).
Functional annotation of the DEUs was performed by searching GO, KEGG and KOG database (Supplementary Table S2). The functional classifications were assigned using GO terms (Fig. 3A). The pathways were defined based on the KEGG database and the results showed that the DEUs were enriched in cell wall of carbohydrate metabolism pathway, plant hormone signal transduction and transcriptions (Fig. 3B). Additionally, the KOG analysis of the DEUs at different time points revealed that during the early stage of an Mi infection (3 DAI), the most abundant DEUs were related to the cytoskeleton (6/16) (Fig. 4B). This indicated that genes encoding components of the cytoskeleton may be involved in the early responses of Cm to Mi. During the middle (14 DAI) and late (28 DAI) stages of an Mi infection, the DEUs associated with signal transduction, post-translational modification, and transcription were the most abundant, implying that these processes may be important for Cm responses to Mi in these stages (Fig. 4C,D).
Analysis of Mi-responsive hormone-relative genes
Plant hormones have been shown to be widely involved in the host plant response to RKN infection. In this study, we identified 26 DEUs associated with the biosynthesis of plant hormones, including ethylene (ET), abscisic acid (ABA), auxin, jasmonic acid (JA), salicylic acid (SA), gibberellic acid (GA), cytokinin, and brassinosteroid (BR). None of the 26 genes were differentially expressed between the control and Mi-infected plants at 3 DAI, while nine and 24 were differentially expressed at 14 and 28 DAI, respectively (Fig. 5 and Table 3). Most of the tested DEUs (24/26) were up-regulated response to the Mi-infection. The exceptions were c181328_g1 (SAG29) and c117343_g1 (GA5), a BR and a GA biosynthesis gene respectively, which were down-regulated at 28d treatment. To validate the RNA-seq data, we analyzed the expression of five hormone biosynthesis genes by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), including DXPS2 (c170107) for ABA biosynthesis, NGA1 (c164349_g5) for auxin, SAG29 (c181328_g1) for BA, IPT4 (c169071_g1) for CK and GA5 (c117343_g1) for GA. Our data indicated that the expression levels of three (DXPS2, NGA1, and IPT4) and two (SAG29 and GA5) genes were up- and down-regulated, respectively, in response to Mi. These observations were consistent with the results of the RNA-seq analysis (Supplementary Fig. S3).
In addition to the DEUs associated with plant hormone biosynthesis, we also identified 139 DEUs associated with other plant hormone-related genes, including hormone response, hormone signal receptor, hormone signal transduction and hormone transportation. The expression patterns of these genes are presented in Supplementary Table S3. Similar to results for the hormone biosynthesis genes, the expression levels of most of the other hormone-related genes were up-regulated (128/139), with the highest expression levels at 28 DAI (98/139).
In addition to genes related to hormone pathways, we also detected many DEUs associated with pathways downstream of plant hormones (Supplementary Table S4). For example, we identified six ethylene-responsive factor (ERF) transcription factor (TF) genes, whose expression levels are affected by ET signals to regulate the expression of downstream genes. We also detected two ABA-responsive SNRK2-encoding genes that influence the expression of downstream genes via phosphorylations. Two auxin response factor (ARF) genes were identified, which influence the downstream auxin-regulated gene expression.
Analysis of nematode-responsive transcription factors
Transcription factors play key roles in modulating plant adaptations to biotic stresses. In this study, we searched the Plant Transcription Factor Database for matches for the 2,430 DEUs, and identified 337 DEUs as candidate TF-encoding genes. Of these, 207 DEUs were categorized into 33 common plant TF families (Supplementary Table S5). Among the 207 DEUs, MYB TFs were the most abundant (19), followed by NAC (18), ERF (18), bHLH (16), and WRKY (14) TFs (Fig. 6A). Most of differentially expressed TFs (DETFs) were up-regulated by the Mi infection (186/207). The down-regulated DETFs included some important TFs such as MYB (3), SBP (2), GRAS (2), and C2H2 (2). We detected only two DETFs at 3 DAI, namely a WRKY gene (c170216_g2) and an E2F gene (c165727_g1). Of the 207 DETFs, 81 were detected at 14 DAI, with all but one of them being up-regulated. Additionally, 188 DETFs were detected at 28 DAI, with 168 being up-regulated and 20 being down-regulated. An analysis of the expression levels of the 207 DETFs revealed that 18 DETFs were most highly expressed at 3 DAI, while 41 and 148 were most highly expressed at 14 DAI and 28 DAI, respectively.
The WRKY genes form a large family of transcriptional regulators in higher plants, and affect many biological processes, such as responses to biotic and abiotic stresses, development, and metabolism24. In this study, the 14 WRKY genes identified among the DETFs belong to different subgroups, specifically groups 1, 2b, 2c, and 3 (Fig. 6C). All WRKY genes were up-regulated at one of the treatment time points (Fig. 6B). For example, the expression of c170216_g2 (WRKY23) was up-regulated at 3 DAI, indicating WRKY23 influences an early response to a Mi infection. Additionally, the expression levels of eight and 12 WRKY genes were up-regulated at 14 and 28 DAI, respectively. The group 3 WRKY genes are reportedly involved in plant host pathogen resistance. We identified five group 3 WRKY genes whose expression levels were up-regulated in response to Mi, suggesting they are important for the resistance of Cm to Mi. The qRT-PCR data (Supplementary Fig. S2) revealed that WRKY33, WRKY40, and WRKY63 expression levels were up-regulated at 14 and 28 DAI.
Comparisons of transcriptomes of Cm and cucumber response to Mi infections
Most Cucurbitaceae crops are sensitive to RKNs. The inbred cucumber line 9930, which is widely cultivated in northern China, has been considerably affected by RKNs. In this study, we compared the transcriptome data of Mi-infected 9930 plants with the data for infected Cm at 14 DAI. We identified 561 differentially expressed cucumber genes (cucDEGs), with 208 and 353 being down- and up-regulated, respectively (Supplementary Table S6). The cucDEGs were functionally annotated using the GO, KOG, and KEGG databases. Several cucDEGs were associated with plant hormones, TFs, and pathogens, similar to the differentially expressed Cm genes. For example, 87 cucDEGs were identified as plant hormone-related genes, including 14 hormone biosynthesis genes associated with the ET, ABA, SA, or JA biosynthesis pathways (Supplementary Table S6).
We compared the genes that were differentially expressed between Cm and 9930 plants at 14 DAI based on a KOG analysis (Fig. 7). We observed significant differences in two gene clusters (i.e., cytoskeleton and RNA processing), suggesting that these genes may be associated with the resistance of Cm to Mi.
Analysis of nematode-responsive cytoskeleton-related genes
Our comparison of the Cm and cucumber transcriptomes suggested that Cm cytoskeleton genes may be involved in the interactions between Cm and Mi, with important consequences for the resistance of Cm to Mi. A total of 64 cytoskeleton-related DEUs were detected, including six at 3 DAI, 31 at 14 DAI, and 63 at 28 DAI (Fig. 8A). Only 51 DEUs were detected at 3 DAI, and the six cytoskeleton-related genes were likely involved in early responses to invading Mi nematodes. All of the DEUs were up-regulated in response to Mi (Fig. 8A). Five genes (c169775_g1, c167639_g1, c169573_g9, c170216_g2, and c166600_g1) were constitutively differentially expressed at all three time points (Supplementary Table S7). Based on analyses of the correlations among the DEU expression levels, two co-expression networks were constructed for the cytoskeleton-related genes. One network contained two NAC domain-containing TFs (c172779_g1 and c170025_g1) and 18 cytoskeleton-related genes (Fig. 8B), including two myosins and four tubulins. Tubulins are a major component of eukaryotic microtubules, while myosins are responsible for microtubule-based motility, which is important for plant defence responses. Our results suggested that NAC TFs may regulate cell wall remodelling following Mi infections. The other network comprised 17 cytoskeleton-related genes and hormone biosynthesis genes for ABA (c170107_g1), GA (c162000_g1), and JA (c165222) (Fig. 8C). This implied that hormone signals help regulate the expression of cytoskeleton-related genes.
In addition to the cytoskeleton-related genes, two DEUs were identified as encoding the actin depolymerizing factor (ADF), which is important for actin formation. We observed similarities between c164561_g1 and Arabidopsis thaliana ADF8, as well as between c166034_g2 and ADF5. The qRT-PCR results revealed that the ADF-encoding genes were differentially expressed at all time points. Additionally, their highest relative expression levels occurred at 28 DAI (Supplementary Fig. S3), suggesting they are important for responses to Mi infections.
Analysis of Cm pathogen-related genes and nematode effectors
We identified a total of 71 DEUs associated with plant pathogen-related genes in all three time points (Supplementary Table S8). It was noted that none of the DEUs were detected at 3d treatment. 28 out of 71 DEUs were detected at 14 d treatment, with 10 DEUs specific to 14d treatment. 57 DEUs were detected at 28 d treatment, with 39 genes were specific to 28d treatment. Only four DEUs were down-regulated genes and all of they were down-regulated at 28d treatment, including WRKY22, FRK1 and two MYB genes (Fig. 9A). Some plant pathogen-related DEUs were transcriptional factors, including four WRKY genes (WRKY1, WRKY2, WRKY22 and WRKY33) and 13 MYB genes. Some were associated with pathogen-related signal transduction pathway, including MPK, MKK and Calcium ion associated protein genes (CAM). It was noted that some key genes involving PAMPs (pathogen-associated molecular patterns) were also identified, including FLS2, BAK1, CDPK9 and SERK4, suggesting that the basic defense response were inspired in Cm response to Mi infection. The expression of SERK4, FLS2 and BAK1 were validated by qRT-PCR (Supplementary Fig. S3), which verified them as up-regulated genes after Mi treatment.
To identify putative Mi genes, we mapped all the Cm RNA-seq reads to the Mi genome. As a result, we identified a total of 6043 Mi genes whose expressions were detected only in the transcriptomes of the Mi-infected Cm roots, and we considered these genes as putative Mi genes (Supplementary Table S9). Of the 6043 genes, 247 were identified as encoding secreted proteins. We compared the sequences of these proteins with all known and annotated secreted proteins from plant parasitic nematodes. A total of 31 homologs were identified, 18 of which were reported previously as putative effectors from the esophageal gland cells of Mi 25 and, among the remaining 13, some were cell wall enzymes, including peroxidases, glutathione S-transferases, and xylanases, suggesting the modification of host cell wall by Mi effectors. The expression patterns of the 31 genes encoding putative effectors in the different libraries were analyzed. Two genes encoding putative effectors Minc03287 and Minc19171 were expressed only in the 3d treatment libraries, suggesting they may play roles in the early stage of nematode infection. The expressions of 28 genes were detected in 14d treatment. In 28d treatment, 28 gene expressions were detected, in which Minc08210 was specifically expressed in 28d treatment. The highest expression levels were detected for the gene encoding Minc08986, a fatty acid and retinol-binding protein. The Minc08986-encoding gene was highly expressed in all the treatment libraries and its expression levels peak in the 28d treatment libraries, suggesting that Minc08986 may play important roles in nematode infections.
The co-expression net of Cm pathogen related DEUs and Mi effectors were analyzed (Fig. 9B). The net contains 13 Cm pathogen related genes and three known Mi effectors (Minc06489, Min06490 and Minc14900). The co-expression net included two transcriptional factors (WRKY2 and MYB), PAMPs-associated genes (BAK1, FLS2 and so on) and pathogen-related signal genes (MPK3 and MPK4), suggesting a complicated gene interactions between Mi and the host.
Discussion
Plant hormone plays an important role in the Mi infection
Plant hormones are known to play important roles in the regulation of plant immune responses to various biostresses. Hormone signaling pathways form a complex interconnected regulation network through which plants can rapidly adapt to biostresses in the environment26. Because of their important roles, the number of known hormone-related genes in Arabidopsis has been reported as 61727, which accounts for about 2.3% of total number of annotated genes in the Arabidopsis genome. In this study, we found that 595 of the 617 Arabidopsis hormones-related genes (87%) had homologs among the 138,390 assembled unigenes from the Cm transcriptome data, indicating that most of the known hormone-related genes were detected in our transcriptome analysis. Some DEUs were identified as plant hormone-biosynthesis genes, involving in ET, ABA, auxin, JA, SA, CK and BR pathway. For example, two of the hormone-related DEUs were predicted to be involved in auxin biosynthesis, and they both encoded proteins that belonged to the cytochrome P450 family. c167047_g2 was found to be a homolog of AT4G31500, which encodes an oxime-metabolizing enzyme in the biosynthetic pathway of glucosinolates28, and c168851_g1 was predicted to encode a cytochrome P450 involved in tryptophan metabolism28. A DEU associated with CK biosynthesis, c171348_g1, was found to be a homolog of AT3G19160, which encodes IPT8, which catalyzes the formation of the CK iPMP from DMAPP and AMP29. These results indicated that many hormone biosynthesis-related genes were involved in the resistance response of Cm to Mi.
Some of the hormone-related DEUs appeared to form integrity pathways for plant hormone biosynthesis. For example, two DEUs associated with the ABA biosynthesis pathway, c158832_g1 and c84395_g1, were identified. c158832_g1 was found to be a homolog of AT1G16540, which encodes molybdenum cofactor sulfurase, which catalyzes the conversion of ABA-aldehyde to ABA in the last step of ABA biosynthesis30. C84395_g1 was found to be a homolog of AT1G52340, which encodes ABA2, a cytosolic short-chain dehydrogenase/reductase involved in the conversion of xanthoxin to ABA-aldehyde in the penultimate step of ABA biosynthesis30. Besides these ABA biosynthesis DEUs, 28 DEUs associated with ABA signal transduction and ABA receptors were identified. Down-stream DEUs in the ABA biosynthesis pathway were also identified. The regulation of ABA is by through snrk gene family, which can phosphorylate AREB genes and then regulate downstream gene expression31. In Arabidopsis, there are 16 snrk genes. In this study, we identified a total of 24 homologs of snrk genes in Cm transcriptome data, and two of they are DEUs. We also identified an AREB gene in DEUs. C186097_g1 is a homolog of AREB1 of Arabidopsis, which can regulate down-stream genes who have ABA-response element in their promoter region32.
The various functions of RKN effectors in the RKN infection
Plants have evolved a two-layered system to defend themselves against pathogen invasions, namely pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP)-triggered immunity (PTI) and effector-triggered immunity (ETI). Because PTI serves as the basal defence system in plants, it is not surprising that pathogens secrete so-called effectors that target the genes involved in PTI. For example, in A. thaliana, AvrPtoA and AvrPtoB secreted by Pseudomonas syringae directly target the signalling partner BAK1, which is involved in PTI 33. Therefore, identifying the effectors secreted by RKNs is crucial for elucidating the molecular basis underlying RKN parasitism of plants. Huang et al. reported that 185 putative effectors are expressed in RKN oesophageal gland cells throughout the parasitic cycle, most of which have unknown functions34. In this study, we identified 247 RKN transcripts encoding small secreted proteins in the transcriptomes of RKN-infected Cm plants, including 31 transcripts encoding known nematode effectors. Some effector functions are known. For example, Minc08210 encodes a substrate-adhesion molecule, while Minc13373 is associated with a lysosomal acid phosphatase34. Additionally, Minc08986 encodes a fatty acid- and retinol-binding protein that can modify plant tissues and defense responses35. Minc11599 was annotated as a glutathione S-transferase thought to prevent the oxidative burst generated in response to nematode infections. Furthermore, we identified 71 pathogenesis-related genes (e.g., FLS2, BAK1, CDPK9, and SERK4), as well as some keys genes affecting PAMP and pathogen-related signal transduction pathways (e.g., MPK, MKK, and calcium ion pathways). Based on gene expression patterns, we constructed a co-expression network that includes three RKN effector genes (Minc06489, Min06490, and Minc14900), two PAMP-associated genes (BAK1 and FLS2), and two pathogen-related signalling genes (MPK3 and MPK4). The BAK1 and FLS2 genes play important roles in plant immune responses, thus making them pathogen effector targets. The BAK1 gene encodes a receptor-like protein kinase, which functions as a co-receptor with FLS2 to mediate PTI36. The AvrPtoB effector secreted by P. syringae can suppress plant host PTI by binding to BAK1 37, while AvrPto binds to FLS2 to block plant immune responses38. Therefore, we speculate that the RKN effectors interact with BAK1 and FLS2 during invasions.
The dual nature of Cytoskeleton-related genes: the susceptible and resistant reactions of host to RKN
The formation of giant cells is the key step of RKN invasions3, with cytoskeleton remodelling mediated by dozens of genes representing an important process39. Some studies concluded that plant hormones are the key regulators of cytoskeleton-related genes. For example, GA can induce the degradation of DELLA proteins by the proteasome40. Five A. thaliana DELLA proteins interact with cytoskeleton-related prefoldin, which is an essential part of the chaperone machinery facilitating the assembly of active α/β-tubulin dimers41. Ethylene can regulate the ERF and consequently inactivate the XTH. The XTH gene family is associated with the formation of plant cells. Root-knot nematode invasions alter the expression of XTH genes as well as their target genes that regulate myosin, tubulin, and lignin contents6. The ARFs bind to the promoter of auxin-responsive genes to regulate expression. The ARF targets include cytoskeleton genes, such as expansin, XTH, and yieldin, indicating that auxin can regulate the expression of cytoskeleton-related genes. We detected 26 DEUs associated with hormone biosynthesis and 139 DEUs related to plant hormones. Therefore, we hypothesize that the hormone levels of Cm plants are influenced by an RKN invasion, ultimately leading to the regulation of cytoskeleton-related genes and increased susceptibility of plant hosts to RKNs (Fig. 10).
In contrast, the cytoskeleton is also an important component of the PTI and ETI plant defence mechanisms against pathogenic organisms41. In A. thaliana, the ADF increases the density of actin filaments, which are required by the PTI components BIK1 (Botrytis-induced kinase 1) and BAK142. In this study, we identified two ADF-encoding DEUs that were significantly differentially expressed at all three time points. We also observed that BAK1 was differentially expressed between control and Mi-infected plants. Our data suggest that BAK1 and ADFs may be important for the resistance of Cm to RKNs. Additionally, two MPK-encoding DEUs (MPK3 and MPK6) were detected. In A. thaliana, ADF can induce the expression of MPK3 and MPK6, which help establish PTI and ETI43. Therefore, our results suggest that ADF-related plant immune responses are responsible for the resistance of Cm to RKNs (Fig. 10).
Materials and Methods
Plant materials and Mi treatments
The resistance of horned melon (Cucumis metuliferus) and the inbred cucumber line 9930, widely planted in northern China, were used in this study. The plant seedlings were grown in greenhouse. J2 juveniles of Mi freshly hatched from egg masses were used as inoculate. After 14 days of sowing, single plants were transplanted into 15 × 15 Cm (diameter/high) plastic pots, which contain a pasteurized mix of sandy loam soil and fine washed river sand (2:1 by volume), the pots were placed in growth chambers programmed to maintain a temperature of 22 °C and 16 h/8 h (light/dark) cycles44. Ten days after transplant, each seedling was inoculated with 500 J2 of Mi. Control was mock-inoculated with water. Plant root galls were harvested 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 14, 28 and 42 day after inoculation (DAI). The roots of 3, 14, and 28 DAI were used to RNA extraction for RNA-seq, with two independent biological replicates of each. All treated roots were further stained with acid fuchsin for observing the development of Mi and estimating gall size and nematode body width, with at least three biological replicates for each treatment time points. Statistical analysis was carried out using R programming language.
RNA extraction and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was isolated from Cm root samples treated with either Mi or water (as a control) for 3d, 14d and 28d using the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The specific primers of target genes were designed using Primer5 software (Supplementary Table 10). For real-time PCR, we performed real-time RT-PCR using BIO-RAD CFX96 (Bio-Rad, USA). Amplification consisted of 40 cycles each as 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at 55 or 60 °C, and 30 s at 72 °C. The experiments were repeated at least three times with independent RNA samples. Relative gene expression was calculated according to Ling et al.44. The beta-actin gene of Cm (ID: c168675_g9) was used as an internal control and the primers were listed as blow:
5′ -ATCCACGAAACTACTTACAACTCC -3′
5′ -ATAGACCCTCCAATCCAGACAC -3′
Transcriptome sequencing and de novo assembly
Poly(A) mRNA was isolated from 10 μg total RNA of each Cm root sample. Each library had an insert size of approximately 300 bp and 100 bp read length, which was sequenced on a HiSeq 2000 system (Illumina, Berry Genomics, BeiJing). After filtering of low-quality raw reads, we used Tophat software to map transcriptome data on Mi genome, and the reads which showed perfect match to Mi genome were view as Mi transcriptome data. After filtering, transcriptome de novo assembly was carried out using Trinity software according to the manufacturer’s instructions45. The assembled transcript whose length is larger than 200 bp was kept. The longest transcript in each locus was taken as the unigene.
Functional analysis of unigenes
To assign possible function annotations, all unigene sequences were searched using Blastx (e-value <10−5) against the following protein databases: PFAM (http://pfam.janelia.org/), KOG (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG/), SWISSPROT (UniProt), NR (NCBI). The gene ontology (GO) were carried out using the Blast2GO program, and were categorized using WEGO software46. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) annotations were obtained in http://www.kegg.jp/.
Identification and functional analysis of DEUs
The DEUs were obtained using edgR method of trinity software by comparing Mi infected libraries with the corresponding control library for each time point. The transcripts were identified as DEUs based on FDR statistical method and changed folds (FDR < 0.001 and log2 Ratio| > 1). The co-expression of DEUs were obtained by R package RNASeqNet47. To obtain the function annotation of Cm DEUs, the DEUs sequences were search using Blastx against plant transcription factor database (plantTFDB v3.0)48 to identify transcription factors, against Arabidopsis hormone database (AHD2.0 v2.0) to identify plant hormone related genes, against Arabidopsis information resource(TAIR: http://www.arabidopsis.org/) to identify pathogen-related genes27.
Transcriptome analysis of Mi and the identification of effectors
The Tophat and cufflink pipeline were used to analyze the transcripts of Mi by mapping RNA-seq data on published Mi genome49, 50 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The numbers of reads of all 12 libraries were normalized to per kilo-base of exon model per million mapped reads (RPKM). SignalP 3.0 (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) was used to predict potential secreted proteins and the transmembrane proteins were removed using the TMHMM software (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM/). The putative mitochondrial proteins were removed using TargetP (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TargetP/). The published nematode-related effectors were downloaded from NCBI. The predicted secreted proteins were search to the nematode-related effectors using blastp.
References
Trudgill, D. L. & Blok, V. C. Apomictic, polyphagous root-knot nematodes: exceptionally successful and damaging biotrophic root pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 39, 53–77, doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.39.1.53 (2001).
Mao, Z. C. et al. Cloning and functional analyses of pepper CaRKNR involved in Meloidogyne incognita resistance. Euphytica. 205, 903–913b, doi:10.1007/s10681-015-1438-8 (2015).
Kyndt, T., Fernandez, D. & Gheysen, G. Plant-Parasitic Nematode infections in rice: molecular and cellular insights. Annual Review of Phytopathology 52, 1–19, doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-102313-050111 (2014).
Tytgat, T., Meutter, J. D., Gheysen, G. & Coomans, A. Sedentary endoparasitic nematodes as a model for other plant parasitic nematodes. Nematology. 2, 113–121, doi:10.1163/156854100508827 (2000).
Inzé, D. & De, V. L. Cell cycle regulation in plant development. Annu Rev Genet. 40, 77–105, doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090431 (2006).
Eklof, J. M. & Brumer, H. The XTH gene family: an update on enzyme structure, function, and phylogeny in xyloglucan remodeling. Plant Physiol. 153, 456–466, doi:10.1104/pp.110.156844 (2010).
De, A. E. J., Rodiuc, N., Smertenko, A. & Abad, P. Plant actin cytoskeleton re-modelling by plant parasitic nematodes. Plant Signal Behav. 5, 213–217, doi:10.4161/psb.5.3.10741 (2010).
Kyndt, T. et al. Transcriptional reprogramming by root knot and migratory nematode infection in rice. New Phytol. 196(3), 887–900, doi:10.1111/nph.2012.196.issue-3 (2012).
Naseem, M., Kaltdorf, M. & Dandekar, T. The nexus between growth and defence signalling: auxin and cytokinin modulate plant immune response pathways. Journal of Experimental Botany. 66, 4885–4896, doi:10.1093/jxb/erv297 (2015).
Jammes, F. et al. Genome-wide expression profiling of the host response to root-knot nematode infection in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 44, 447–458, doi:10.1111/tpj.2005.44.issue-3 (2005).
Klink, V. P., Alkharouf, N., MacDonald, M. & Matthews, B. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and expression analyses of Glycine max (soybean) syncytium containing root regions formed by the plant pathogen Heterodera glycines (soybean cyst nematode). Plant Mol Biol. 59(6), 965–79, doi:10.1007/s11103-005-2416-7 (2005).
Klink, V. P., Overall, C. C., Alkharouf, N. W., MacDonald, M. H. & Matthews, B. F. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and comparative microarray expression analysis of syncytial cells isolated from incompatible and compatible soybean (Glycine max) roots infected by the soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines). Planta. 226(6), 1389–409, doi:10.1007/s00425-007-0578-z (2007).
Jin, J., Hewezi, T. & Baum, T. J. The Arabidopsis bHLH25 and bHLH27 transcription factors contribute to susceptibility to the cyst nematode Heterodera schachtii. Plant J. 65, 319–328, doi:10.1111/tpj.2011.65.issue-2 (2011).
Grunewald, W. et al. A role for AtWRKY23 in feeding site establishment of plant-parasitic nematodes. Plant Physiol. 148, 358–368, doi:10.1104/pp.108.119131 (2008).
Oh, S. K. et al. CaWRKY2, a chili pepper transcription factor, is rapidly induced by incompatible plant pathogens. Mol Cells. 22(1), 58–64 (2006).
Hamamouch, N., Li, C., Seo, P. J., Park, C. M. & Davis, E. L. Expression of Arabidopsis pathogenesis-related genes during nematode infection. Mol Plant Pathol 12(4), 355–64, doi:10.1111/mpp.2011.12.issue-4 (2011).
Ji, H. L. et al. Transcriptional analysis through RNA sequencing of giant cells induced by Meloidogyne graminicola in rice roots. J. Exp. Bot. 64, 3885–3898, doi:10.1093/jxb/ert219 (2013).
Beneventi, M. A. et al. Transcription profile of soybean-root-knot nematode interaction reveals a key role of phythormones in the resistance reaction. BMC Genomics. 14, 322, doi:10.1186/1471-2164-14-322 (2013).
Portillo, M. et al. Isolation of RNA from laser-capture-microdissected giant cells at early differentiation stages suitable for differential transcriptome analysis. Mol Plant Pathol. 10(4), 523–35, doi:10.1111/mpp.2009.10.issue-4 (2009).
De, S. M. E. et al. Transcriptome analysis of resistant soybean roots infected by Meloidogyne javanica. Genet Mol Biol 35(1), 272–282 (2012).
Walters, S. A., Wehner, T. C. & Barkel, K. R. Root-knot nematode resistance in cucumber and horned cucumber. HortScience. 28, 151–154 (1993).
Faske, T. R. et al. Penetration, post-penetraton development, and reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita on Cucumis melo var. taxanus. J Nematol. 45(1), 58–65 (2013).
Chen, J. F. & Lewis, S. New source of nematode resistance was identified in Cucumis. Cucurbit Genet Coop Rep. 23, 32–35 (2000).
Fassuliotis, G. Species of Cucumis resistant of the root knot nematode, Meloidigyne incognita acrta. Plant Dis Rptr 51, 720–723 (1976).
Ling, J. et al. Genome-wide analysis of WRKY gene family in Cucumis sativus. BMC genomics. 12, 471, doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-471 (2011).
Pieterse, C. M. et al. Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 28, 489–521, doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055 (2012).
Jiang, Z. et al. AHD2.0: an update version of Arabidopsis Hormone Database for plant systematic studies. Nucleic Acids Research 39, D1123–D1129, doi:10.1093/nar/gkq1066 (2011).
Zhao, Y. et al. Trp-dependent auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis: involvement of cytochrome P450s CYP79B2 and CYP79B3. Genes and Development. 16, 3100–3112, doi:10.1101/gad.1035402 (2002).
Deng, Y. et al. Arabidopsis histidine kinase CKI1 acts upstream of HISTIDINE PHOSPHOTRANSFER PROTEINS to regulate female gametophyte development and vegetative growth. Plant Cell 22, 1232–1248, doi:10.1105/tpc.108.065128 (2010).
Schwartz, S. H., Léon-Kloosterziel, K. M., Koornneef, M. & Zeevaart, J. A. Biochemical characterization of the aba2 and aba3 mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 114(1), 161–166, doi:10.1104/pp.114.1.161 (1997).
Fujita, Y., Yoshida, T. & Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K. Pivotal role of the AREB/ABF-SnRK2 pathway in ABRE-mediated transcription in response to osmotic stress in plants. Physiol. Plant. 147, 15–27, doi:10.1111/ppl.2013.147.issue-1 (2013).
Kim, S. et al. ARIA, an Arabidopsis arm repeat protein interacting with a transcriptional regulator of abscisic acid-responsive gene expression, is a novel abscisic acid signaling component. Plant Physiol. 136, 3639–3648, doi:10.1104/pp.104.049189 (2004).
Shan, L. et al. Bacterial effectors target the common signaling partner BAK1 to disrupt multiple MAMP receptor-signaling complexes and impede plant immunity. Cell Host Microbe. 4(1), 17–27, doi:10.1016/j.chom.2008.05.017 (2008).
Huang, G. Z. et al. A profile of putative parasitism genes expressed in the esophageal gland cells of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 16, 376–381, doi:10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.5.376 (2003).
Rey-Burusco MF et al. Diversity in the structures and ligand-binding sites of nematode fatty acid and retinol-binding proteins revealed by Na-FAR-1 from Necator americanus. Biochem J. 471, 403–414 (2015).
Kim, B. H., Kim, S. Y. & Nam, K. H. Assessing the diverse functions of BAK1 and its homologs in arabidopsis, beyond BR signaling and PTI responses. Mol Cells. 35(1), 7–16, doi:10.1007/s10059-013-2255-3 (2013).
Cheng, W. et al. Structural analysis of Pseudomonas syringae AvrPtoB bound to host BAK1 reveals two similar kinase-interacting domains in a type III Effector. Cell Host Microbe 10(6), 616–626, doi:10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.013 (2011).
Xiang, T. et al. Pseudomonas syringae effector AvrPto blocks innate immunity by targeting receptor kinases. Curr Biol. 18(1), 74–80, doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.12.020 (2008).
Martin, J. et al. Interconnection between actin cytoskeleton and plant defense signaling. plant Signaling and Behavior. 9(11), e976486, doi:10.4161/15592324.2014.976486 (2014).
Ram, D. Plant Cytoskeleton: DELLA Connects Gibberellins to Microtubules. current biology 23, 479–481, doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.04.037 (2013).
Hauvermale, A. L. et al. Gibberellin signaling: a theme and variations on DELLA repression. Plant Physiol. 160, 83–92, doi:10.1104/pp.112.200956 (2012).
Henty-Ridilla, J. L. et al. The plant actin cytoskeleton responds to signals from microbe-associated molecular patterns. PLoS Pathog 9, e1003290, doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1003290 (2013).
Tsuda, K. et al. Dual regulation of gene expression mediated by extended MAPK activation and salicylic acid contributes to robust innate immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plos Genet. 9, e1004015, doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1004015 (2013).
Thies, J. A. & Fery, R. L. Heat Stability of Resistance to Meloidogyne incognita in Scotch Bonnet Peppers (Capsicum chinense Jacq.). J Nematol. 32(4), 356–361 (2000).
Ling, J., Jiang, W., Zhang, Y., Yu, H., Mao, Z., Gu, X., Huang, S. & Xie, B. Genome-wide analysis of WRKY gene family in Cucumis sativus. BMC Genomics. 12, 471, doi:10.1186/1471-2164-12-471 (2011).
Haas, B. J. et al. De novo transcript sequence reconstruction from RNA-seq using the Trinity platform for reference generation and analysis. Nat. Protoc. 8, 1494–1512, doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.084 (2013).
Ye, J. et al. WEGO: a web tool for plotting GO annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 34(suppl 2), W293–W297, doi:10.1093/nar/gkl031 (2006).
Jin, J. P., Zhang, H., Kong, L., Gao, G. & Luo, J. C. PlantTFDB 3.0: a portal for the functional and evolutionary study of plant transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Research. 42(D1), D1182–D1187, doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1016 (2014).
Abad, P. et al. Genome sequence of the metazoan plant-parasitic nematode Meloidogyne incognita. Nat. Biotechnol. 26, 909–915, doi:10.1038/nbt.1482 (2008).
Hong, S. J. et al. Canonical Correlation Analysis for RNA-seq Co-expression Networks. Nucleic Acids Res. 41(8), e95–e95, doi:10.1093/nar/gkt145 (2013).
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO. 31571996, 31672010, 31030057, 31000922). The Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-2017-IVF). The National Key Basic Research and Development Program of China [grant no.2012CB113900]; Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, P.R.China. China Agriculture Research System (CARS-25).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.J. contributed to bioinformatics analysis and writing of the manuscript. M.Z.J. contributed to nematode inoculation of Cm and 9930. M.Z.J. and Z.F. contributed to R.N.A. extraction, RT-PCR, real-time P.C.R., Y.H.Y. helped with the management for Cm and cucumber seeding. X.B.Y. designed the experiments and contributed to revisions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ling, J., Mao, Z., Zhai, M. et al. Transcriptome profiling of Cucumis metuliferus infected by Meloidogyne incognita provides new insights into putative defense regulatory network in Cucurbitaceae. Sci Rep 7, 3544 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03563-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-03563-6
This article is cited by
-
Biological control of the root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on eggplants with various chitinase-producing Streptomyces strains
European Journal of Plant Pathology (2023)
-
Plant defense responses in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous host plants during root-knot nematode infection
Plant and Soil (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.