Recombinant BCG Expressing LTAK63 Adjuvant induces Superior Protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis


In order to develop an improved BCG vaccine against tuberculosis we have taken advantage of the adjuvant properties of a non-toxic derivative of Escherichia coli heat labile enterotoxin (LT), LTAK63. We have constructed rBCG strains expressing LTAK63 at different expression levels. Mice immunized with BCG expressing low levels of LTAK63 (rBCG-LTAK63lo) showed higher Th1 cytokines and IL-17 in the lungs, and when challenged intratracheally with Mycobacterium tuberculosis displayed a 2.0–3.0 log reduction in CFU as compared to wild type BCG. Histopathological analysis of lung tissues from protected mice revealed a reduced inflammatory response. Immunization with rBCG-LTAK63lo also protected against a 100-fold higher challenge dose. Mice immunized with rBCG-LTAK63lo produced an increase in TGF-β as compared with BCG after challenge, with a corresponding reduction in Th1 and Th17 cytokines, as determined by Real Time RT-PCR. Furthermore, rBCG-LTAK63lo also displays protection against challenge with a highly virulent Beijing isolate. Our findings suggest that BCG with low-level expression of the LTAK63 adjuvant induces a stronger immune response in the lungs conferring higher levels of protection, and a novel mechanism subsequently triggers a regulatory immune response, which then limits the pathology. The rBCG-LTAK63lo strain can be the basis of an improved vaccine against tuberculosis.


Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) the causative agent of tuberculosis remains a major worldwide health problem, responsible for over 10.4 million cases and 1.8 million deaths annually1. The difficulty of timely diagnosis and the requirement of many months of treatment, leads to interruptions in treatment and generates antibiotic resistance. The increasing frequency of multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates of tuberculosis and others2, 3, has resulted in infections extremely difficult to treat and has been a major concern for health authorities worldwide2.

The current vaccine against tuberculosis, Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), is the only vaccine available. It is a safe and low cost vaccine administered to more than 4 billion individuals since it’s licensing in 1921. It can protect children efficiently against early manifestations of Mtb. However, the protective memory response induced by BCG immunization wanes in 10–20 years and it induces limited protection against adult pulmonary Mtb3. Hence, immunization strategies to either replace or supplement BCG are urgently needed.

Several challenges remain in Mtb vaccine development, such as the lack of immune markers and correlates of protection or the definition of mechanisms of protective immunity against Mtb. Nonetheless, some aspects of the immune response that can control the infection have been identified, such as the essential role for CD4+ Th1 and CD8+ T cells that produce IFN-γ and TNF-α and more recently, a protective role for IL-17. There is also evidence that multifunctional T cells that produce IFN-γ, TNF-α and/or IL-2 simultaneously may correlate with protection4,5,6.

Over the last decades, there have been substantial efforts towards the development of new tuberculosis vaccines, some of which have reached clinical trials3. Current vaccine approaches have focused on a variety of strategies, such as: (1) recombinant proteins that include dominant T cell antigens from Mtb or BCG; (2) viral vectors such as MVA, adenovirus or even DNA vaccines expressing the same T cell antigens; (3) recombinant BCG (rBCG) overexpressing T cell antigens (including phagosome-escape mutants); or (4) vaccines based on rationally attenuated Mtb or other mycobacterial species, such as M. vaccae and M. smegmatis 3, 7,8,9,10. There are also prime-boost strategies being tested with BCG or rBCG prime and boost with recombinant proteins, viral vectors and DNA vaccines. Most of these strategies attempt to induce the class I MHC pathway of antigen presentation by cross-priming and increase CD4+ Th1 and CD8+ T cell response against the mycobacteria11. More than 100 Mtb vaccine candidates have been tested in different animal models, including non-human primates, with some promising candidates currently in clinical trials12, 13. However, efficacy in humans has not yet been demonstrated.

We have investigated an alternative strategy for improvement of the BCG vaccine. It is well known that bacterial toxins and toxin derivatives have adjuvant properties14, 15. We have previously generated rBCG strains expressing tetanus toxin fragment C (FC), the mutated diphtheria toxin derivative, CRM197, and the genetically detoxified subunit S1 of pertussis toxin – S1PT-9K/129G, demonstrating that BCG expressing FC and CRM197 modulates the immune response towards Th2, whereas BCG expressing S1PT promoted a shift towards Th1 responses in several animal models16,17,18,19,20,21. Although it is still not clear what kind of immune responses are necessary for protection against Mtb infections, it is generally accepted that induction of potent Th1 responses will be important. Therefore, we have investigated the expression of a potent Th1-driving toxin derivative – a genetically detoxified mutant of E. coli heat labile enterotoxin, LTK6315, in BCG, to develop a candidate vaccine against Mtb.

LT is a very potent toxin that promotes antibody and broad T cell responses, similar to cholera toxin. When used as vaccine adjuvant, LT has been shown to enhance antigen presentation, stimulate T cell proliferation and cytokine production, and promote strong mucosal IgG and IgA antibody responses22. Genetic detoxification in the A subunit transforms it into a potent non-toxic mucosal adjuvant with increasing ability to induce Th1 responses15. Broad pre-clinical testing as mucosal adjuvant showed no toxicity in mice23, guinea pigs24 and macaques25, and it has an extensive clinical safety record of oral and percutaneous administration, although nasal administration has not been recommended26. The A subunit of LTK63 has not yet been evaluated as adjuvant and it is not expected to have the potential toxic properties ascribed to the binding B subunit when delivered intranasally.

Here we have developed new rBCG constructs expressing LTK63 derivatives at different levels using promoters with varying strengths to optimize the immune response and obtain higher protective levels against Mtb challenge. The rBCG-LTAK63 strain was shown to induce protection in several mouse models (different challenge doses and times after challenge), including challenge with a highly virulent Beijing strain.


Construction and characterization of protection by rBGC-LTK63 and rBCG-LTAK63

Initially, the whole ltk63 gene was placed under control of the P blaF* promoter. Immunization with the rBCG-LTK63 strain induced a 2.0 log reduction in CFU in the lungs of immunized mice following a challenge with virulent M. tuberculosis H37Rv (recovered 30 days latter) when compared with control animals and a 1.0 log reduction when compared with BCG-immunized animals (Fig. 1). However, the rBCG-LTK63 strain was not stable upon passaging. We considered the hypothesis that the expression of the whole molecule could be toxic to the bacteria.

Figure 1

Protection of mice immunized with rBCG-LTK63 from Mtb challenge. BALB/c mice were immunized with BCG or rBCG-LTK63 (1 × 106 CFU) (s.c.) and challenged intratracheally 8 weeks later with a dose of Mtb H37Rv (1 × 105 CFU). Recovery of Mtb was evaluated in the lungs 30 days after challenge. (a) Experiment 1 (n = 10 animals) and (b) Experiment 2 (n = 6–8 animals). Bars are mean ± S.D. (*) Differences were considered statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05 as compared to the BCG group (one-way ANOVA).

Therefore, in another construct only the ltak63 subunit was placed under control of the P blaF* promoter, resulting in a rBCG strain displaying high level of expression of LTAK63 (Supplementary Fig. 1). BALB/c mice immunized with this strain and challenged intratracheally with Mtb displayed a 1.4–2.0 log lower CFU count (recovered 30 days latter) when compared with control animals and 0.3–0.4 log reduction when compared with BCG (Supplementary Fig. 2a,b).

Construction and protective immunity of rBCG expressing lower levels of LTAK63

In order to evaluate if the expression levels of LTAK63 would affect the immune response and protection, the ltak63 gene was codon optimized for expression in mycobacteria and placed under control of the P AN promoter, considered a weaker promoter as compared to P blaF* . The resulting strain displayed lower expression levels of LTAK63, as compared to the original construct, generating rBCG-LTAK63lo (Fig. 2a). By comparison, the construct containing the P blaF* promoter was named rBCG-LTAK63hi (Supplementary Fig. 1 and Supplementary Fig. 2a and b).

Figure 2

Western blot of different rBCG-LTAK63 constructs and cytokine production in the splenocytes and lungs of mice immunized with these constructs. (a) Western blot of total soluble protein extracts from BCG, rBCG-LTAK63hi, BCG-vector (BCG transformed with the empty pMIP12 expression vector) or rBCG-LTAK63lo (10 μg) analyzed using a polyclonal anti-LTAK63 antibody (1:500). BALB/c mice were immunized with either BCG, rBCG-LTAK63hi or rBCG-LTAK63lo (1 × 106 CFU). Splenocytes were isolated after 60 days and in vitro re-stimulated with CFP to produce (b) IFN-γ, and (c) TNF-α as determined by ELISA, or (d) CD4+ T cells doubly positive for IFN-γ/IL-2 and (e) CD4+ T cells doubly positive for IFN-γ/TNF-α. Lung cells were separated and re-stimulated with CFP to produce (f) IFN-γ, (g) TNF-α, (h) IL-6 and (i) IL-17. Results are mean ± S.D. (*) Differences were considered statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05 as compared to the BCG group (one-way ANOVA).

Immunization of BALB/c mice with rBCG-LTAK63hi or rBCG-LTAK63lo induced mycobacteria-specific IFN-γ-secreting spleen cells; TNF-α production was also detected in splenocytes from mice immunized with rBCG-LTAK63hi (Fig. 2b,c). Furthermore, both constructs induced significantly higher production of IFN-γ/IL-2 double positive CD4+ T cells and rBCG-LTAK63lo induced higher levels of IFN-γ/TNF-α double positive CD4+ T cells (Fig. 2d,e). On the other hand, lung cells from mice immunized with rBCG-LTAK63lo displayed higher production of IFN-γ, IL-6, and IL-17 when compared with lung cells from mice immunized with BCG or rBCG-LTAK63hi (Fig. 2f–i).

BALB/c mice immunized with the rBCG-LTAK63lo construct and challenged with Mtb had a 3.0–4.0 log reduction in CFU (recovered 30 days latter) when compared with control animals and 2.5–3.0 log reduction when compared with BCG-immunized mice (Fig. 3a,b). Histopathology analysis of lung tissues from non-immunized and challenged mice shows intense infiltration of inflammatory cells. The lung tissues of mice immunized with rBCG-LTAK63lo display decreased inflammation as compared to those immunized with BCG (Fig. 3c–f). These findings demonstrate that immunization with rBCG-LTAK63lo induces protective immunity against Mtb and that this may be associated with reduced infection-induced inflammation in the lungs.

Figure 3

Protection against challenge with Mtb induced by immunization with rBCG-LTAK63lo. BALB/c mice were immunized with BCG, rBCG-LTAK63hi or rBCG-LTAK63lo (1 × 106 CFU) and a group received PBS; they were challenged intratracheally 12 weeks later with a dose of Mtb H37Rv (1 × 105 CFU). Bacteria were recovered from the lungs 30 days after challenge. (a) Experiment 1 (n = 5 animals) and (b) Experiment 2 (n = 8–10 animals). Bars are mean ± S.D. (*) Differences were considered statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05 or (**) P ≤ 0.01 as compared to the BCG group (one-way Anova). Histological analysis was performed on the lungs of challenged mice from Experiment 1: that received (c) PBS, (d) BCG, (e) rBCG-LTAK63hi or (f) rBCG-LTAK63lo and challenged with Mtb 90 days post immunization. Tissues were collected 30 days post challenge, sectioned, stained with H&E, and examined by optical microscopy. Bars indicate 100 µm scale.

Challenge of rBCG-LTAK63 immunized mice with a higher dose of Mtb

BALB/c mice immunized with the rBCG-LTAK63lo construct were challenged after 12 weeks with a 100-fold higher dose of Mtb (1 × 107 CFU of H37Rv) and the bacteria were quantified in the lungs of mice 30 and 60 days after challenge. At 30 days, immunization with BCG provided no protection, while rBCG-LTAK63lo induced a significant reduction of ~3.0 logs CFU in the lungs of immunized mice compared with PBS or BCG-immunized mice (Fig. 4a). All mice immunized with rBCG-LTAK63lo survived, whereas 40% of control or BCG immunized mice died 2 weeks after the Mtb challenge (not shown). At 60 days, mice immunized with rBCG-LTAK63lo still displayed ~1.0 log reduction in CFU in the lungs, while BCG was comparable to control mice (Fig. 4b).

Figure 4

Immunization of mice with rBCG-LTAK63lo induces protection against challenge with a higher dose of Mtb. BALB/c mice were immunized with BCG or rBCG-LTAK63lo (1 × 106 CFU) and a group received PBS and challenged 12 weeks later with a high intratracheal dose of Mtb H37Rv (1 × 107 CFU). Bacteria were recovered from the lungs of challenged mice after (a) 30 days or (b) 60 days. In a second experiment under the same conditions bacteria were recovered from the lungs of challenged mice after c) 120 days. (*) Differences were considered statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05 as compared to the BCG group (one-way Anova). Histological analysis was performed on the lungs of challenged mice that received: (d) PBS, (e) BCG or (f) rBCG-LTAK63lo. Tissues were collected 30 days post challenge, sectioned, stained with H&E and examined by optical microscopy. Bars indicate 100 µm scale.

In another experiment, groups of BALB/c mice were immunized with either BCG, rBCG-LTAK63hi or rBCG-LTAK63lo, and challenged after 90 days with a high dose of Mtb, and bacteria recovered from the lungs after 120 days. Mice immunized with PBS or BCG had comparable CFU levels, while mice immunized with r-BCG-LTAK63lo showed a 1.1 log reduction when compared with BCG-immunized mice (Fig. 4c).

Histopathology analysis of lung tissues from mice immunized with rBCG-LTAK63lo and challenged with Mtb display decreased inflammation when compared with non-immunized or BCG-immunized mice, which showed intense infiltration of inflammatory cells (Fig. 4d–f).

Quantitative mRNA expression of cytokines was determined in the lungs of mice immunized with rBCG-LTAK63lo and challenged with either 1 × 105 CFU (from Fig. 3a) or the higher dose of Mtb, 1 × 107 CFU (from Fig. 4a). When challenged with the higher dose of Mtb, an increased expression of the regulatory molecule, TGF-β, was observed in the rBCG-LTAK63lo group when compared with the BCG group (Fig. 5b), but comparable levels were detected in the low dose challenge (Fig. 5a). On the other hand, expression of the inflammatory cytokines, IL-12, IFN-γ, TNF-α, and IL-17, together with NF-κB2, were decreased in the rBCG-LTAK63lo-immunized mice when compared with those immunized with BCG (Fig. 5b), and the same trend was observed for most of the cytokines in the low challenge dose, although not statistically significant (Fig. 5a). In contrast, the expression of TGF-β and the inflammatory cytokines, IL-12, IFN-γ, TNF-α or NF-κB2 were not altered in the BCG group when compared with the PBS group at either challenge dose (Fig. 5a and b). The expression of IL-17 was lower in the BCG group than in the PBS group in the high dose challenge, although IL-17 levels in the rBCG-LTAK63lo were even lower (Fig. 5b).

Figure 5

Cytokine production in the lungs of BALB/c mice immunized with rBCG-LTAK63lo and challenged with Mtb as evaluated by Real-Time RT-PCR. Lung tissue from mice immunized with BCG or rBCG-LTAK63lo were collected 30 days post-challenge with either (a) Mtb H37Rv (1 × 105 UFC) or (b) a higher dose of Mtb H37Rv (1 × 107 UFC) and cytokine mRNA expression fold changes of IL-12, IFN-γ, TNF-α, TGF-β, NF-κB2 and IL-17, were analyzed by Real-Time RT-PCR. Differences were considered statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05 as compared to (*) BCG or (**) compared to PBS (one-way Anova). Target gene expression was normalized as compared to GAPDH and Actin levels.

Challenge of rBCG-LTAK63 immunized mice with a highly virulent Beijing clinical isolate

In order to assess the efficacy of rBCG-LTAK63lo vaccine against a clinical isolate, BALB/c mice immunized with rBCG-LTAK63lo or BCG, were challenged 90 days later with the Mtb Beijing strain 1471. The dose chosen (1 × 103 CFU/animal) was previously determined as a lethal dose in C57BL/6 mice27. An examination of lung bacterial load 30 days later showed that mice immunized with rBCG-LTAK63lo had 1.5–2.2 logs reduction in bacterial burden when compared to mice immunized with BCG or PBS (P < 0.05) (Fig. 6).

Figure 6

Protection induced by immunization with rBCG-LTAK63lo against challenge with Mtb Beijing clinical isolate. BALB/c mice were immunized with BCG or rBCG-LTAK63lo (1 × 106 CFU) and a group received PBS and they were challenged intratracheally 12 weeks later with a dose of Mtb Beijing clinical isolate (1 × 103 CFU). Bacteria were recovered from the lungs 30 days after challenge. (a) Experiment 1 (n = 7 animals) and (b) Experiment 2 (n = 7 animals). Bars represent mean ± S.D. (*) Differences were considered statistically significant when P ≤ 0.05 as compared to the BCG group (one-way Anova).


The significant new findings of this study are the demonstration that a modified BCG vaccine expressing a non-toxic mutant toxin of E. coli, with adjuvant properties, is highly immunogenic and can confer superior protection against M. tuberculosis and a subsequent regulatory mechanism after infection that prevents pathology in the lungs. We have previously demonstrated that BCG expressing bacterial toxin derivatives with known adjuvant properties can shift immune responses induced towards a Th1-type in vivo 19, 20. Although there is still considerable controversy over what kind of immune response is required for an effective vaccine against tuberculosis, the consensus view is that a shift towards a Th1 profile should be protective, with increased production of IFN-γ, TNF-α and IL-2. More recently there is evidence of a protective role for IL-17 and multifunctional CD4+ T cells4, 28. In this study, we demonstrate significant protection against TB challenge in mice using a recombinant BCG expressing the mutated A subunit of LTK63, exploiting the known adjuvant properties of LT.

The rBCG-LTK63 was not stable, but using only the LTAK63 subunit expressed under the control of 2 different promoters (a strong and a weak mycobacterial promoter) it was possible to obtain different expression levels – rBCG-LTAK63hi and rBCG-LTAK63lo. The level of antigen expression in BCG can affect the immune response induced29 and this could influence the intensity of the adjuvant effect on the mycobacteria and possibly the level of protection. The expression of the A subunit through a high-strength promoter allowed stable expression, but induced lower protection levels against challenge. Higher protection levels were obtained through the use of a weaker mycobacterial promoter. Analysis of the antigen-specific immune response using spleen cells from immunized mice revealed IFN-γ and TNF-α production, even at 60 days after immunization, but this did not correlate with the protection. In contrast, evaluation of immune responses in the lungs revealed higher IFN-γ, TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-17 production in rBCG-LTAK63lo- immunized mice when compared with BCG or rBCG-LTAK63hi groups and this correlated with better protection against challenge with M. tuberculosis. However, more complex mechanisms may be involved and other parameters should be investigated to serve as correlates of protection30.

Immunization of mice with either construct of rBCG-LTAK63 induced higher Th1 responses when compared to the BCG group, determined either by the higher concentrations of IFN-γ and/or TNF-α produced by splenocytes from immunized animals or by IFN-γ/IL-2 or IFN-γ/TNF-α double positive CD4+ T cells. The immune responses detectable in the spleen were comparable for both rBCG-LTAK63 constructs, and were not very different from those reported for other vaccine candidates based on recombinant BCG, or even other vaccine strategies31. It was only in the lungs that clear differences in the immune response could be observed between the different BCG vaccines, probably reflecting the importance of local cellular immune responses at the site of infection.

The two most widely used Mtb challenge models have been the aerosol and the intratracheal models, and authors have favored the first due to the fact that it would be a more physiological representation of infection. However, it has been hypothesized that, the low dose challenge may not represent the high and constant exposure of individuals to Mtb infection occurring in high burden settings32. This could account for the inability of the currently used challenge models to provide correlates of protection and predict efficacy in humans. Nonetheless, whichever model used, at 30 days after infection, mice usually have comparable numbers of bacteria in the lungs ~106–107 CFUs, showing a 1 log reduction due to BCG immunization. The current strategies being investigated for the development of vaccines against TB have shown variable results in terms of protection. Strategies based on live attenuated bacteria or viruses, expressing immunodominant antigens from Mtb, or BCG prime/Mtb protein boost have been shown to induce up to 1 log CFU reduction as compared to BCG7. The immunization of mice with rBCG-LTAK63lo showed a protection level considerably higher than those described to date, inducing a 2.0–3.0 log reduction in CFU in the lungs of immunized and challenged mice. Furthermore, histopathological analysis indicated considerable reduction in lung injury as compared to BCG.

On the other hand, in these models BCG is protective in adult mice, which does not reflect what is observed in adult humans, usually not protected by immunization with the BCG vaccine. Rook et al.32 have proposed that populations living in areas with higher burden of disease such as developing countries, may be exposed to different conditions of infection, which may not be reproduced by our animal challenge models. They hypothesize that probably due to overcrowding and delayed treatment much of TB occurring is due to high-dose challenge, and thus higher challenge doses should be investigated32. Therefore, we have used a more stringent model, inoculating higher doses of the Mtb H37Rv strain in a challenge condition in which BCG is not protective. Under these challenge conditions, wild type BCG showed no protection in terms of lung colonization by Mtb when compared with control animals. Since rBCG-LTAK63lo was more immunogenic and protective, it was used for further characterization. Animals immunized with the rBCG-LTAK63lo construct, displayed 100% survival following the high-dose challenge with 107 CFU up to 120 days after immunization, while both BCG and non-immunized animals had a fatality rate of 40%, probably due to non-controlled inflammation as observed by histopathology analysis (not shown). The fact that mice immunized with rBCG-LTAK63lo show a strong immune response in the lungs at 60 days and significant protection at 90 days after immunization indicates induction of a long-term memory immune response. Induction of memory immune responses will be further investigated.

We investigated the immune response induced in the lungs of immunized animals after intratracheal challenge with 2 different challenge doses of Mtb, 105 CFU and 107 CFU. Mice that were immunized with rBCG-LTAK63lo and challenged with the higher Mtb dose were shown to have a suppressive lung environment, with decreased levels of Th1 and IL-17 cytokines, as detected by real time PCR in the lungs, and a similar tendency was observed at the lower dose challenge. This effect seems to be regulated by TGF-β. This is contrary to what was observed in BCG-immunized animals. This cytokine has been shown to be up-regulated in inflammatory processes against bacterial infections33. Furthermore, TGF-β has also been implicated in the inhibition of mycobacterial growth34. Our results show that immunization with rBCG-LTAK63lo induces a more intense Th1 response profile and IL-17 cytokine production in the lungs and suggests a mechanism of protection associated with limitation of the inflammatory response after challenge that prevents immunopathology. Whether it was the higher immune response or other mechanisms induced by the vaccine itself that triggered the regulatory response after infection is still to be determined. This regulatory response induced after challenge, with reduction in Th1 and inflammatory cytokines, is an effect that has not been observed with BCG or with other Mtb vaccine candidates.

Clinical Mtb isolates are useful to verify whether vaccine candidates can be effective towards MDR strains. Here we showed that rBCG-LTAK63lo was protective against this hypervirulent Beijing strain, whereas BCG did not have any protective effect. Interestingly, it has been shown that BCG offers protection against some Beijing strains, but not others, and the mechanisms are yet to be determined35. The variability of virulence among Beijing strains could be crucial for effective host protection against Mtb infection mediated by BCG36, 37. Furthermore, immunization with rBCG-LTAK63lo induced a 1.0–2.0 log reduction in CFU of mice challenged with the Beijing strain as compared to BCG, which is lower than the 2.0–3.0 log reduction observed when mice are challenged with H37Rv, indicating that protection would be higher against the latter strain. It has been described that the mechanism of infection of H37Rv and Beijing strains can be different27.

There are several strategies currently being pursued for the development of TB vaccines based on live mycobacterial strains (either recombinant BCG or attenuated M. tuberculosis)9, 38, 39. Strategies based on BCG improvement by overexpression of MTB immunodominant antigens, such as Ag85B or the RD-1 locus, have been seriously considered for further development38, 40. Phagosome-escape mutants incorporating Listeriolysin of Listeria monocytogenes have been shown to be more effective in eliciting an immune response against TB, progressing to Phase II clinical trials with promising results39, 41. Recently, it has been shown that the deletion of zmp1 gene from BCG improved protection in the guinea pig model of tuberculosis42. However, the lack of immune correlates of protection for MTB in validated animal models or in humans has hindered progress. Furthermore, the use of different immunization regimes and infection models has limited the comparison of protective efficacy between the different vaccine candidates. Nevertheless, considering the reduction in bacterial load recovered in the lungs after challenge, it is clear that rBCG-LTAK63lo displays extremely high protection levels; some parameters support our conclusion: (1) the comparison with wild type BCG, (2) the histopathological analyses of the lungs after the challenge, which show preserved tissue even after a very high challenge dose and (3) although the intratracheal challenge doses used are much higher than those used in aerosol challenges, the bacterial burden recovered from non-immunized and BCG control groups are comparable. This strain can be the basis for expression of other immunogenic TB antigens, in an attempt to further increase its protective properties. On the other hand, due to the high protection levels, it would be suitable for Systems Biology studies in search for much needed biomarkers of protection against TB43.

The Geneva consensus in 2005 congregated the current experiences with live mycobacterial vaccines to identify essential steps in the development of new live TB vaccines44. A set of quality and safety requirements were established to guide product development44. The second Geneva Consensus in 2009 outlined regulatory requirements, manufacturing considerations and general criteria for clinical development towards Phase I, II and III trials45. Both consider that it is essential to provide a complete characterization of the product and establish consistent protective efficacy in animal models. Here, we initiate the process, characterizing the immune response and protective efficacy of the rBCG-LTAK63lo strain. Experiments to characterize the safety of the strain and the protective efficacy in other animal models in the aerosol challenge are underway.

In the current study, we have demonstrated the importance of promoter strength and level of expression of the LTK63 adjuvant derivatives expressed in recombinant BCG on the modulation of the immune response induced against mycobacteria. The superior immunogenicity and protection induced by this recombinant BCG strain against Mtb challenge revealed a novel mechanism of protection against pathology after infection.


Bacterial strains and Mtb challenge

The Mycobacterium bovis BCG Moreau strain (Instituto Butantan) was used to generate the recombinant BCG strains; M. tuberculosis H37Rv and Beijing clinical isolate 1471 were used in the challenge experiments (Supplementary Methods).

All animal experiments were performed according to Brazilian and international guidelines on animal experimentation and approved by the Ethics Committee at Instituto Butantan, São Paulo – SP (CEUAIB), (Permit Number 601/09). Mice were challenged by the intratracheal route with 1 × 105 CFU of Mtb per animal, as a dose previously established in the laboratory46. Alternatively mice were challenged with a higher dose, 1 × 107 CFU of Mtb per animal, 60 or 90 days after a single immunization. Immunized mice were also challenged with 1000 CFU Beijing isolate, as previously described27. Animals were euthanized 30, 60 or 120 days after the infection and the bacterial loads were determined by plating whole or partial lung homogenates on MB7H10/OADC agar plates.

Flow cytometry for cell-surface markers and intracellular cytokines

Lung cells and/or splenocytes (2 × 105) were isolated (Supplementary Methods) stimulated with CFP (5.0 µg/mL) for 12 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. The cells were then collected for intracellular cytokine staining with FITC, PE or PE-Cy7-conjugated monoclonal antibodies against CD4 and cytokines. The supernatant was collected for analysis by Cytometric Bead Array (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA) Mouse Th1/Th2/Th17 Cytokine Kit or by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Data were acquired on a FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD) and analyzed using the FlowJo 8.7 software.

Real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)

Lung cell suspensions were recovered from immunized animals 30 days after challenge with Mtb. Total RNA was isolated using a Nucleospin II kit, according to the manufacturer’s directions (BD Biosciences). The mRNA was reverse transcribed using a ThermoScript™ RT-PCR System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for First-Strand cDNA Synthesis. Pre-designed gene expression and TaqMan Gene Expression Master Mix (Invitrogen) were used with the Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA), 7300 Real-Time PCR apparatus. Target gene expression was normalized to GAPDH and actin levels.

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as mean (±) SD of at least two independent experiments. Significance of differences among groups was calculated by Student´s t tests or ANOVA.


  1. 1.

    World Health Organization releases. 2015 global report on tuberculosis. Breathe 11, 244–244 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Zumla, A., Raviglione, M., Hafner, R. & von Reyn, C. F. Tuberculosis. The New England journal of medicine 368, 745–755, doi:10.1056/NEJMra1200894 (2013).

  3. 3.

    Aagaard, C., Dietrich, J., Doherty, M. & Andersen, P. TB vaccines: current status and future perspectives. Immunol Cell Biol 87, 279–286, doi:10.1038/icb.2009.14 (2009).

  4. 4.

    O’Garra, A. et al. The immune response in tuberculosis. Annual review of immunology 31, 475–527, doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-032712-095939 (2013).

  5. 5.

    Hokey, D. A. & Ginsberg, A. The current state of tuberculosis vaccines. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics 9, 2142–2146, doi:10.4161/hv.25427 (2013).

  6. 6.

    Kaufmann, S. H. Novel tuberculosis vaccination strategies based on understanding the immune response. Journal of internal medicine 267, 337–353, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2796.2010.02216.x (2010).

  7. 7.

    Sweeney, K. A. et al. A recombinant Mycobacterium smegmatis induces potent bactericidal immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Med 17, 1261–1268, doi:10.1038/nm.2420 (2011).

  8. 8.

    Gupta, U. D., Katoch, V. M. & McMurray, D. N. Current status of TB vaccines. Vaccine 25, 3742–3751, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.01.112 (2007).

  9. 9.

    Arbues, A. et al. Construction, characterization and preclinical evaluation of MTBVAC, the first live-attenuated M. tuberculosis-based vaccine to enter clinical trials. Vaccine 31, 4867–4873, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.07.051 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Lowrie, D. B. et al. Therapy of tuberculosis in mice by DNA vaccination. Nature 400, 269–271, doi:10.1038/22326 (1999).

  11. 11.

    Wang, C. C., Zhu, B., Fan, X., Gicquel, B. & Zhang, Y. Systems approach to tuberculosis vaccine development. Respirology 18, 412–420, doi:10.1111/resp.12052 (2013).

  12. 12.

    Kaufmann, S. H. Tuberculosis vaccine development at a divide. Current opinion in pulmonary medicine 20, 294–300, doi:10.1097/MCP.0000000000000041 (2014).

  13. 13.

    Abebe, F. & Bjune, G. The protective role of antibody responses during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Clinical and experimental immunology 157, 235–243, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2009.03967.x (2009).

  14. 14.

    Douce, G. et al. Genetically detoxified mutants of heat-labile toxin from Escherichia coli are able to act as oral adjuvants. Infection and immunity 67, 4400–4406 (1999).

  15. 15.

    Pizza, M. et al. Mucosal vaccines: non toxic derivatives of LT and CT as mucosal adjuvants. Vaccine 19, 2534–2541, doi:10.1016/S0264-410x(00)00553-3 (2001).

  16. 16.

    Nascimento, I. P. et al. Recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG expressing pertussis toxin subunit S1 induces protection against an intracerebral challenge with live Bordetella pertussis in mice. Infection and immunity 68, 4877–4883, doi:10.1128/iai.68.9.4877-4883.2000 (2000).

  17. 17.

    Miyaji, E. N. et al. Induction of neutralizing antibodies against diphtheria toxin by priming with recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG expressing CRM(197), a mutant diphtheria toxin. Infection and immunity 69, 869–874, doi:10.1128/IAI.69.2.869-874.2001 (2001).

  18. 18.

    Mazzantini, R. P. et al. Adjuvant activity of Mycobacterium bovis BCG expressing CRM197 on the immune response induced by BCG expressing tetanus toxin fragment C. Vaccine 22, 740–746, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.08.017 (2004).

  19. 19.

    Christ, A. P. et al. Enhancement of Th1 lung immunity induced by recombinant Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guerin attenuates airway allergic disease. American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology 43, 243–252, doi:10.1165/rcmb.2009-0040OC (2010).

  20. 20.

    Chade, D. C. et al. Immunomodulatory effects of recombinant BCG expressing pertussis toxin on TNF-alpha and IL-10 in a bladder cancer model. Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research: CR 27, 78, doi:10.1186/1756-9966-27-78 (2008).

  21. 21.

    Andrade, P. M. et al. The therapeutic potential of recombinant BCG expressing the antigen S1PT in the intravesical treatment of bladder cancer. Urol Oncol 28, 520–525, doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2008.12.017 (2010).

  22. 22.

    Marinaro, M. et al. Mucosal delivery of the human immunodeficiency virus-1 Tat protein in mice elicits systemic neutralizing antibodies, cytotoxic T lymphocytes and mucosal IgA. Vaccine 21, 3972–3981, doi:10.1016/S0264-410X(03)00295-0 (2003).

  23. 23.

    Dietrich, J. et al. Mucosal administration of Ag85B-ESAT-6 protects against infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and boosts prior bacillus Calmette-Guerin immunity. J Immunol 177, 6353–6360, doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.6353 (2006).

  24. 24.

    Badell, E. et al. Protection against tuberculosis induced by oral prime with Mycobacterium bovis BCG and intranasal subunit boost based on the vaccine candidate Ag85B-ESAT-6 does not correlate with circulating IFN-gamma producing T-cells. Vaccine 27, 28–37, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.10.034 (2009).

  25. 25.

    Barnett, S. W. et al. Protection of macaques against vaginal SHIV challenge by systemic or mucosal and systemic vaccinations with HIV-envelope. Aids 22, 339–348, doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f3ca57 (2008).

  26. 26.

    Lewis, D. J. et al. Transient facial nerve paralysis (Bell’s palsy) following intranasal delivery of a genetically detoxified mutant of Escherichia coli heat labile toxin. PloS one 4, e6999, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006999 (2009).

  27. 27.

    Amaral, E. P. et al. Pulmonary infection with hypervirulent Mycobacteria reveals a crucial role for the P2X7 receptor in aggressive forms of tuberculosis. PLoS pathogens 10, e1004188, doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1004188 (2014).

  28. 28.

    Zarate-Blades, C. R. et al. Evaluation of the overall IFN-gamma and IL-17 pro-inflammatory responses after DNA therapy of tuberculosis. Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics 9, 1093–1103, doi:10.4161/hv.23417 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Dhar, N., Rao, V. & Tyagi, A. K. Skewing of the Th1/Th2 responses in mice due to variation in the level of expression of an antigen in a recombinant BCG system. Immunol Lett 88, 175–184, doi:10.1016/S0165-2478(03)00043-9 (2003).

  30. 30.

    Weiner, J. 3rd & Kaufmann, S. H. Recent advances towards tuberculosis control: vaccines and biomarkers. Journal of internal medicine 275, 467–480, doi:10.1111/joim.12212 (2014).

  31. 31.

    Montagnani, C., Chiappini, E., Galli, L. & de Martino, M. Vaccine against tuberculosis: what’s new? BMC infectious diseases 14(Suppl 1), S2, doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-S1-S2 (2014).

  32. 32.

    Rook, G. A., Hernandez-Pando, R. & Zumla, A. Tuberculosis due to high-dose challenge in partially immune individuals: a problem for vaccination? The Journal of infectious diseases 199, 613–618, doi:10.1086/596654 (2009).

  33. 33.

    Vizzini, A., Di Falco, F., Parrinello, D., Sanfratello, M. A. & Cammarata, M. Transforming Growth Factor beta (CiTGF-beta) gene expression is induced in the inflammatory reaction of Ciona intestinalis. Developmental and comparative immunology 55, 102–110, doi:10.1016/j.dci.2015.10.013 (2015).

  34. 34.

    L’Abbate, C. et al. TGF-beta-mediated sustained ERK1/2 activity promotes the inhibition of intracellular growth of Mycobacterium avium in epithelioid cells surrogates. PloS one 6, e21465, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021465 (2011).

  35. 35.

    Marcus, S. A., Steinberg, H. & Talaat, A. M. Protection by novel vaccine candidates, Mycobacterium tuberculosis Delta mosR and Delta echA7, against challenge with a Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing strain. Vaccine 33, 5633–5639, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.08.084 (2015).

  36. 36.

    Lasunskaia, E. et al. Emerging multidrug resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains of the Beijing genotype circulating in Russia express a pattern of biological properties associated with enhanced virulence. Microbes and infection/Institut Pasteur 12, 467–475, doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2010.02.008 (2010).

  37. 37.

    Andrade, M. R. M. et al. Pathogenic Mycobacterium bovis strains differ in their ability to modulate the proinflammatory activation phenotype of macrophages. Bmc Microbiol 12, 166, doi:10.1186/1471-2180-12-166 (2012).

  38. 38.

    Hoft, D. F. et al. A new recombinant bacille Calmette-Guerin vaccine safely induces significantly enhanced tuberculosis-specific immunity in human volunteers. The Journal of infectious diseases 198, 1491–1501, doi:10.1086/592450 (2008).

  39. 39.

    Hess, J. et al. Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette-Guerin strains secreting listeriolysin of Listeria monocytogenes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95, 5299–5304, doi:10.1073/pnas.95.9.5299 (1998).

  40. 40.

    Pym, A. S. et al. Recombinant BCG exporting ESAT-6 confers enhanced protection against tuberculosis. Nat Med 9, 533–539, doi:10.1038/nm859 (2003).

  41. 41.

    Loxton, A. G. et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of the Recombinant Mycobacterium bovis BCG Vaccine VPM1002 in HIV-Unexposed Newborn Infants in South Africa. Clinical and vaccine immunology: CVI 24, doi:10.1128/CVI.00439-16 (2017).

  42. 42.

    Sander, P. et al. Deletion of zmp1 improves Mycobacterium bovis BCG-mediated protection in a guinea pig model of tuberculosis. Vaccine 33, 1353–1359, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.058 (2015).

  43. 43.

    Berry, M. P., Blankley, S., Graham, C. M., Bloom, C. I. & O’Garra, A. Systems approaches to studying the immune response in tuberculosis. Current opinion in immunology 25, 579–587, doi:10.1016/j.coi.2013.08.003 (2013).

  44. 44.

    Kamath, A. T. et al. New live mycobacterial vaccines: the Geneva consensus on essential steps towards clinical development. Vaccine 23, 3753–3761, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.03.001 (2005).

  45. 45.

    Walker, K. B. et al. The second Geneva Consensus: Recommendations for novel live TB vaccines. Vaccine 28, 2259–2270, doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.083 (2010).

  46. 46.

    Morais Fonseca, D. et al. Experimental tuberculosis: designing a better model to test vaccines against tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 90, 135–142, doi:10.1016/ (2010).

Download references


We acknowledge the support from Fundação Butantan and fellowships from FAPESP to I.P.N. and C.C.S. We thank Vania L.D. Bonato for advice and suggestions on immune response experiments.

Author information

I.P.N. constructed vectors and bacterial strains, contributed to the design of most experiments, analyzed and interpreted data. D.R. performed and contributed to the design of most experiments on the evaluation of immune response. H.K.R. and C.C.S. performed and designed experiments of RT-PCR. A.P.P.-K. analyzed the histopathology samples. E.D.C.G., C.L.S., C.C.S. and I.P.N. carried out infection and challenge experiments and analyzed data. E.P.A., M.R.D.L. and M.H.H. designed and performed the experiments with the Beijing strain. N.W. and B.G. contributed to the conceptual design of expression vectors, especially promoters and analysis of data. K.H.G.M., M.P. and R.R. contributed to the conceptual design of the bacterial strains, especially the adjuvant contribution and analysis of data. L.C.C.L. contributed to the conceptual design of the project and the design of most experiments, analyzed and interpreted data. I.P.N., D.R., H.K.R., C.C.S., A.P.P.-K., N.W., B.G., K.H.G.M., M.P., R.R. and L.C.C.L. wrote the paper.

Correspondence to Luciana C. C. Leite.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

I.P.N. and L.C.C.L. have a patent application involving the rBCG-LTK63 and rBCG-LTKA63 strains use as MTB vaccines. M.P. and R.R. are GlaxoSmithKline employees.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nascimento, I.P., Rodriguez, D., Santos, C.C. et al. Recombinant BCG Expressing LTAK63 Adjuvant induces Superior Protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis . Sci Rep 7, 2109 (2017).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.