Article | Open

Coupling of equatorial Atlantic surface stratification to glacial shifts in the tropical rainbelt

  • Scientific Reports 7, Article number: 1561 (2017)
  • doi:10.1038/s41598-017-01629-z
  • Download Citation
Published online:


The modern state of the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation promotes a northerly maximum of tropical rainfall associated with the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). For continental regions, abrupt millennial–scale meridional shifts of this rainbelt are well documented, but the behavior of its oceanic counterpart is unclear due the lack of a robust proxy and high temporal resolution records. Here we show that the Atlantic ITCZ leaves a distinct signature in planktonic foraminifera assemblages. We applied this proxy to investigate the history of the Atlantic ITCZ for the last 30,000 years based on two high temporal resolution records from the western Atlantic Ocean. Our reconstruction indicates that the shallowest mixed layer associated with the Atlantic ITCZ unambiguously shifted meridionally in response to changes in the strength of the Atlantic meridional overturning with a southward displacement during Heinrich Stadials 2–1 and the Younger Dryas. We conclude that the Atlantic ITCZ was located at ca. 1°S (ca. 5° to the south of its modern annual mean position) during Heinrich Stadial 1. This supports a previous hypothesis, which postulates a southern hemisphere position of the oceanic ITCZ during climatic states with substantially reduced or absent cross-equatorial oceanic meridional heat transport.


The Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) can be defined as a narrow belt of maximum tropical precipitation associated with the ascending branch of the Hadley circulation1. It is one of the most prominent features of the general atmospheric circulation, regulating the tropical hydrologic cycle and the cross–equatorial atmospheric energy transport2, 3. The position of the ITCZ is linked to meridional sea surface temperature (SST) gradients, resulting in predictable latitudinal shifts in line with the seasonal cycle3, 4. Primarily because of the meridional ocean–atmospheric energy transport, the annual average position of the ITCZ is not located at the equator, but north of it (Fig. 1a)1, 3, 5. At the tropical Atlantic surface, the position of the ITCZ is marked not only by a low-salinity belt (Fig. 1a) but also by a prominent change in water column structure. Excess of freshwater flux below the ITCZ changes the density of the upper water column by creating a thin low salinity surface layer which hampers efficient wind-driven vertical mixing6, 7 and results in a pronounced shallow mixed layer between 5°N–12°N (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Information and Supplementary Fig. S2). This upper ocean feature is considered to be the oceanic counterpart of the ITCZ. The shallow mixed layer allows the presence of cold and nutrient–rich thermocline waters in the photic zone (Supplementary Fig. S2), steepening the thermal vertical gradient and boosting regional primary productivity8. Indeed, the resulting shallow tropical mixed layer together with the elevated productivity is recorded in the composition of planktonic foraminifera faunas in the seafloor sediments below, which could be used to track the mean position of the oceanic counterpart of the ITCZ in the equatorial Atlantic (i.e., the Atlantic ITCZ).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Tropical Atlantic Ocean maps with location of the investigated cores, upper water column properties and modern planktonic foraminifera response to the mean annual mixed layer depth. (A) Mean annual surface salinity (WOA 200929) and location of cores GeoB16206–1 (1°34.75′S, 43°01.42′W) and M35003–4 (12°5.4′N/61°14.6′W). The black dashed lines indicate the mean annual (thick) and seasonal (thin) position of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ). The central portions of the subtropical gyres (STG) are indicated. (B) Mean annual mixed layer depth6, 7, 49. (C) Distribution of the RN/Gg ratio. Black dots represent the location of the 407 surface sediment samples28. Figure created using Ocean Data View software50 (ODV - version, 4.7.4.,, 2015).

Paleoceanographic records suggest recurrent millennial-scale events of disrupted cross-equatorial heat transport due to slowdowns of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)9, 10, associated with massive fluxes of icebergs and melt water into the North Atlantic11 (i.e., Heinrich Stadials, HS). As a result, the ITCZ adjusted its position, reflecting the change in interhemispheric heat transport, migrating towards the warmer hemisphere, in this case, southward11. While the changes in the position of the ITCZ over land are increasingly well documented due to the associated shifts in rainfall patterns12,13,14,15,16, it remains unclear whether and to which extent the Atlantic ITCZ also changed in response to millennial-scale global climate forcing17, 18. Since the tropical sea surface temperature (SST) gradient modulates the meridional migration of maximum tropical precipitation associated to the ITCZ4, some studies have reconstructed the tropical SST gradient as well as sea surface salinity changes in order to estimate the past position of the Atlantic ITCZ17, 18. However, the temporal resolution of the available records does not allow the evaluation of the behavior of the Atlantic ITCZ at millennial-scale. Thus, new proxies and high-temporal resolution records that adequately track the mean position of the Atlantic ITCZ during millennial-scale events are required.

Here we provide a new proxy for the mixed layer depth based on the relative abundance of three planktonic foraminifera species and apply it to track the position of the Atlantic ITCZ during the last 30 cal ka BP in high-temporal resolution. We compared the modern distribution of planktonic foraminifera in surface sediments from the Atlantic Ocean between 30°N and 30°S with the water mass distribution to identify a suitable group of species that appropriately respond to the shallowest mixed layer associated with the Atlantic ITCZ (see Materials and Methods and Supplementary information). As a result, Neogloboquadrina dutertrei, Neogloboquadrina incompta and Globigerina glutinata were identified as key species to track the modern position of the Atlantic ITCZ in space. The east–west belt of higher abundance of N. dutertrei and N. incompta, accompanied by minimum abundance of G. glutinata between 5° and 15°N reflects to the mean annual position of the ITCZ (5°–12°N) (Supplementary Information and Fig. S1). Considering the opposing abundance patters of both Neogloboquadrina species and G. glutinata in the equatorial Atlantic Ocean, we propose that the ratio RN/Gg = %Neogloboquadrina/(%Neogloboquadrina + %G. glutinata) can be used as a proxy for the modern position of the shallowest mixed layer associated with the Atlantic ITCZ (Fig. 1c). These species as well as the RN/Gg ratio respond well to the significant changes in the hydrographic and trophic structure of the upper ocean associated with the shallowest mixed layer related to the ITCZ (Supplementary Fig. S2).

To reconstruct the variability of the Atlantic ITCZ over time, we applied the RN/Gg ratio to two sediment cores located on opposite sides of the modern seasonal range of the Atlantic ITCZ (Fig. 1a), synchronized based on high–resolution radiocarbon chronologies (Supplementary Table 1). The position of the cores has been carefully selected such that a meridional shift of the Atlantic ITCZ should cause an antiphased behavior of the RN/Gg records of both cores. Core GeoB16206–1 (1°34.75′S/43°01.42′W/1367 m water depth) was raised off NE Brazil (Fig. 1) and features exceptionally high sedimentation rates during HS1 (up to 93 cm kyr–1) and the YD (~60 cm kyr–1) (Supplementary Fig. S3)13. Core M35003–4 (12°5.4′N/61°14.6′W/1300 m water depth) was raised from the Tobago Basin19, 20 (Fig. 1) and its AMS 14C ages were recalibrated to make both records comparable (see Materials and Methods). The planktonic foraminifera assemblage was newly determined in GeoB16206–1 while that from core M35003–4 was taken from Hüls and Zahn (ref. 20) (Supplementary Fig. S6). The subsurface temperatures were reconstructed at both sites using a planktonic foraminifera–based Modern Analogue Technique (MAT) (see Materials and Methods). We also analyzed the Ti/Ca ratio in GeoB16206–1 to infer millennial-scale increases in river runoff associated with pulses of ITCZ-related rainfall over NE Brazil12,13,14. Additionally, we used the output from a transient simulation of the last deglaciation (provided by the TraCE-21ka project, using a comprehensive coupled atmosphere-ocean general circulation model22 to assess the effects of the AMOC slowdown during HS1 on the meridional displacement of the ITCZ and on the mixed layer depth of the tropical Atlantic (see Materials and Methods for a detailed design of model simulations).

Off NE Brazil, the abundances of N. dutertrei and N. incompta show an opposite pattern to that of G. glutinata over the last 30 cal ka BP (Supplementary Fig. S5ad). High RN/Gg values (≥0.5) are accompanied by a strong cooling of subsurface waters (2–4 °C) during HS2–1 and the YD (Fig. 2f,g, Supplementary Fig. S5d,e). Changes in the RN/Gg ratio and subsurface temperatures are synchronous to changes in 231Pa/230Th from the Bermuda Rise9, 10 and suggest a fast response of the assemblages of planktonic foraminifera off NE Brazil to changes in the strength of the AMOC (Fig. 2b,f,g). This fast response is consistent with the development of a rainfall-induced shallow mixed layer off NE Brazil caused by the a southward migration of the ITCZ during the HS2–1 and the YD12,13,14, 23. Indeed, higher RN/Gg values as well as cooler subsurface waters occurred simultaneously with increased ratios of Ti/Ca from core GeoB16206–1 during HS2–1 and the YD (Fig. 2f,h), highlighting the tight connection between the position of the shallowest mixed layer and the position of the tropical rainbelt by the meridional movements of the ITCZ. The subsurface cooling can partly be attributed to a reduced downward mixing of heat from the strongly salinity-stratified surface layers6,7,8.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Antiphase relationship of the upper water column off NE-Brazil and at the Tobago Basin over the last 30 cal ka BP. (A) Greenland δ18O record51; (B) Bermuda Rise cores GGC5 (purple) and ODP1063 (black) 231Pa/230Th as a proxy for the strength of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC)9, 10; (C) Cariaco Basin core ODP1002C reflectance showing wet/dry conditions linked to meridional shifts of the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ)15; %Neogloboquadrina/(%Neogloboquadrina + %G. glutinata) (RN/Gg) ratio as a proxy for the position of the Atlantic ITCZ in the (D) Tobago Basin core M35003–4 and in the (G) NE Brazil core GeoB16206–1; Modern Analog Technique-based temperature at 50 m water depth in the (E) Tobago Basin and (F) off NE Brazil; (H) Ti/Ca ratio as a proxy for precipitation over NE Brazil. Grey shading in (D) and (G) indicates the 95% confidence interval. Vertical gray bars indicate Heinrich Stadials 2 and 1 (HS2–1) and the Younger Dryas (YD). The Bølling–Allerød (B/A) is also indicated. Calibrated AMS 14C ages are shown as green triangles for core M35003–419, 20 and yellow stars for core GeoB 16206–13. Yellow circle in (E) and (F) indicate modern temperature at core locations29. Note the inverted axes in (B) and (C).

A clear antiphase relationship is observed in both the RN/Gg and subsurface temperature records off NE Brazil and the Tobago Basin (Fig. 2dg, Supplementary Fig. S7be). Elevated values of RN/Gg and cooler subsurface waters off NE Brazil occurred simultaneously (i.e., within age model uncertainties) with decreased RN/Gg values (deeper mixed layer) and warmer subsurface waters (partly due to enhanced turbulent downward mixing of heat) in the Tobago Basin during HS2–1 and the YD. The deglacial antiphase behavior is supported by the significant anticorrelation of RN/Gg (Pearson correlation coefficient r is −0.50 with 95% confidence interval [−0.72; −0.19], see Materials and Methods) and subsurface temperatures at 50 m (r = −0.72 with 95% confidence interval [−0.87; −0.46]) between the records off NE Brazil and the Tobago Basin. This antiphasing strongly suggests that the meridional movements of the Atlantic ITCZ influenced both sites during millennial–scale climate oscillations with a southward shift during HS2–1 and the YD (Fig. 2). At the northern range of the modern ITCZ seasonal migration, the high–temporal reflectance record from Cariaco Basin indicates dry conditions near the Tobago Basin off northern South America during HS1 and the YD due to the southward displacement of the ITCZ15 (Fig. 2c). On the opposite side of the seasonal migration range of the ITCZ, our Ti/Ca record (Fig. 2h) is consistent with geochemical proxies12,13,14, speleothems14, 24, model simulations23 and palynological information25 from continental and marine archives collected around NE Brazil that indicate increased rainfall. Taken together, these records strongly indicate that the ocean–atmosphere systems associated with the ITCZ shifted meridionally during millennial–scale climatic oscillations of the last 30 cal ka BP.

We assume the influence of the Parnaiba River runoff on the GeoB16206–1 RN/Gg record to be negligible. Our assumption is supported by the fact that, in the Amazon River plume, RN/Gg displays intermediate values (~0.4–0.5) probably associated with a large freshwater flux, which leads to a relatively shallow mixed layer6, 26 (Fig. 1c and S1f). Since the Parnaíba River discharge is several orders of magnitude lower than that of the Amazon discharge, higher values of RN/Gg (≥0.6) found off NE Brazil during the HS2–1 and the YD are unlikely to be explained solely by increased Parnaíba River runoff. We argue that the highest values of RN/Gg recorded in core GeoB16206–1 were primarily caused by the southward shift and prolonged presence of the Atlantic ITCZ off NE Brazil during Heinrich-like events.

The TraCE-21k coupled atmosphere-ocean transient simulation of the last deglaciation also shows a clear antiphase pattern between the region off NE Brazil and the Tobago Basin for both the mixed layer depth and the annual mean surface ocean freshwater flux in response to a slowdown of the AMOC (Fig. 3). During HS1, the simulation shows a positive anomaly (relative to the LGM) in net precipitation off NE Brazil and a negative anomaly over the Tobago Basin owing to a southward shift of the ITCZ (Fig. 3a). These results corroborate previous model simulations4. Importantly, in agreement with our RN/Gg and subsurface temperature records (Fig. 2dg), the ITCZ shift goes along with a change in tropical Atlantic mixed layer depths (Fig. 3b). The model results therefore strongly support the notion of an ITCZ-driven shift in mixed layer depth, although the effects of anomalous surface freshwater fluxes on tropical mixed layer depth may be modified by wind-stress and circulation anomalies.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Simulated response of tropical Atlantic Ocean surface freshwater flux and mixed layer depth to a slowdown of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation. Shown are the long–term mean (A) surface freshwater flux (precipitation plus continental runoff minus evaporation) and (B) mixed layer depth anomalies during Heinrich Stadial 1 (18–15 ka average) relative to the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) (22–19 ka average) from the transient TraCE-21ka deglacial simulation22. Starting from the LGM, the coupled climate model (CCSM3) was integrated through the last deglaciation, subject to varying forcing by orbital insolation, atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, continental ice sheets, and meltwater fluxes. Figure created using NCL (NCAR Command Language,

Our results indicate that the upper water column off NE Brazil responded to a positive anomaly of freshwater flux promoted by a southward shift of the ITCZ through a shoaling of the mixed layer and changes in the plankton community during HS2–1 and the YD. Physical and ecological changes in the upper tropical Atlantic followed southward displacements of the Atlantic ITCZ triggered by decreases in cross-equatorial heat transport associated with slowdowns in the AMOC. The investigated records indicate that, in the western tropical Atlantic, the Atlantic ITCZ may have been located south of the equator at ca. 1°S (with a mean displacement of ca. 5° from its modern mean annual position) during Heinrich Stadial 1, findings that are supported by climate model simulations. Therefore, our results support the model-derived hypothesis of an ITCZ position to the south of the equator under a markedly reduced cross-equatorial oceanic heat transport1.

Materials and Methods

Modern planktonic foraminifera and oceanic properties

The 407 surface sediments samples from the Atlantic Ocean used to characterize our proxy for the mixed layer depth span 30°N – 30°S and have been summarized by the MARGO Project27, 28 (Figs S1cf, S2a,f). The abundances of planktonic foraminiferal species in these samples were compared with mean annual physico–chemical properties (i.e., temperature, salinity, oxygen and phosphate concentration) from the World Ocean Atlas 2009 (WOA 200929,30,31,32). All foraminiferal samples were picked from >150 µm size fraction of sample splits containing approximately 300 specimens27, 28. The ages of the majority surface sediments (392 samples) fall into chronostratigraphic levels 4 and 5 as defined by the MARGO Project27, 28. Level 4 classifies surface samples with an age range of 0–4 cal ka BP where the chronologic control is based on stratigraphic constraints such as δ18O and %CaCO3. Level 5, in turn, describes surface samples that have no age control27. The foraminiferal data used here are available from the World Data Center PANGAEA (

Marine sediment cores

To reconstruct the variability of the Atlantic ITCZ over time, we used two high- resolution marine sediment cores from the western tropical Atlantic Ocean, located on opposite sides of the modern ITCZ (Fig. S1). Core GeoB16206–1 (1°34.75′S, 43°01.42′W, 1367 m water depth) was raised off NE Brazil33 close to the southernmost position (January) of the modern annual migration cycle of the atmospheric ITCZ. Core M35003–4 (12°5.4′N/61°14.6′W/1300 m water depth) was raised from the Tobago Basin below the northernmost position of the ITCZ (July) (Fig. S1b). Core GeoB16206–1 is composed of weakly bioturbated to bioturbated foraminifera bearing clays, and was sampled (10 cm3 per sample) continuously every 10 cm (i.e., 81 samples). All samples were freeze–dried and washed through a sieve of 150 µm mesh size. Details about the lithology and sampling strategy and preparation of samples for core M35003–4 are available in Rühlemann et al. (ref. 19) and Hüls and Zahn (ref. 20).

Planktonic foraminifera assemblage

All samples from core GeoB16206–1 were dry picked from the >150 µm size fraction and quantified in relative abundances from splits containing more than 300 specimens per sample. The taxonomy was based on Stainforth et al.34 and Hemleben et al.35. The species Neogloboquadrina dutertrei was distinguished from Neogloboquadrina pachyderma (d) (=Neogloboquadrina incompta) by the occurrence of an umbilical tooth and the presence of more than four chambers in N. dutertrei36. We assumed the effect of dissolution in our planktonic foraminiferal faunal composition to be negligible since core Geob16206–1 was collected at 1367 m water depth, well above the modern and glacial lysocline37. Planktonic foraminifera faunal composition data for core M35003–4 was previously published by Hüls and Zahn (ref. 20) (Fig. S6). Here we propose the use of the ratio RN/Gg = %Neogloboquadrina/(%Neogloboquadrina + %G. glutinata) as a proxy for mixed layer depth, which can be used to track the modern position of the Atlantic ITCZ. The confidence intervals of the RN/Gg ratio (95%) were determined by random subsampling (1000 bootstrap cycles) of 300 individuals of a modeled planktonic foraminifera assemblage (N = 10000) with given relative abundances of the G. glutinata and both Neogloboquadrina species. The lower (2.5%) and upper (97.5%) boundaries of the respective confidence intervals are shown in Fig. 2d,g.

Age model

The chronology of sediment core GeoB16206–1 has recently been published in Zhang et al.13 and is based on 12 AMS radiocarbon measurements of the planktonic foraminifer Globigerinoides sacculifer performed at the Poznan Radiocarbon Laboratory in Poland (Table S1). Raw ages were calibrated using the Calib 7.0 software38 and the Marine13 radiocarbon calibration curve39. Ages between calibrated 14C AMS values were linearly interpolated, and expressed in calibrated kiloannum B.P. (cal ka BP) (Fig. S3). To make both records readily comparable, we recalibrated the AMS 14C ages from core M35003–419, 20 using the same procedure described above.

Subsurface temperature reconstruction

Subsurface temperatures from sites GeoB16206–1 and M35003–4 were estimated from a planktonic foraminifera transfer function determined by the Modern Analogue Technique (MAT) using the software C240. The MAT compares fossil samples with a given calibration dataset and selects those with the most similar faunal composition as analogs for environmental conditions. The planktonic foraminifera calibration dataset used here comprised the previously mentioned 407 surface samples from the Atlantic Ocean between 30°N and 30°S from the MARGO database27, 28. Temperature reconstructions derived from transfer functions based on planktonic foraminifera are usually calibrated against fixed near–surface (i.e., 10 m) values41. However, Telford et al.41 demonstrated that planktonic foraminifera are more sensitive to subsurface than surface temperatures. Hence, temperature reconstructions based on a fixed near–surface water depth (e.g., 10 m water depth) can be biased. Since more than 70% of the planktonic foraminifera species present in both cores (i.e., Globigerinoides ruber, G. sacculifer, G. glutinata and Globigerinella siphonifera) inhabit the upper 60 m of the water column42,43,44, we extracted and calibrated the modern annual temperature values for 50 m water depth from WOA 200929. This also allowed us to assess subsurface temperatures directly affected by the Atlantic ITCZ (Fig. S2b). For our MAT transfer function we employed the squared chord distance as a similarity measure und used the weighted mean of the best 10 modern analogues as reconstruction result27. Using the leave–one–out cross–validation method, the root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) of the transfer function was calculated as 1.02 °C (R2 = 0.90) (Fig. S4).

Major element composition

The intensities of major elements of sediment core GeoB16206–1 were determined with the X–ray fluorescence (XRF) core–scanner II (AVAATECH Serial No.2) at MARUM, University of Bremen. Scanning was performed directly over the split core surface of the archive half. Analyses were performed every 2 cm step over a 0.15 cm2 area for 20 seconds with current of 10 kV. Besides, we also measured major element concentrations of 37 bulk sediment samples to calibrate scanner intensities. Samples of about 10 ml (~5 g dry sediment) of core GeoB16206–1 were freeze–dried, powdered and homogenized, and then prepared for measurement by energy dispersive polarization X–ray fluorescence (EDP–XRF) spectroscopy at MARUM. We applied a log–ratio regression approach45 to calibrate the proportions of six major elements (i.e., Ca, Fe, Al, Si, Ti and K). Here we show the ratio between calibrated proportions of Ti and Ca.

Coupled atmosphere-ocean TraCE-21ka simulation

To support our proxy-derived finding of ITCZ-induced shifts of the tropical Atlantic mixed layer, we analyzed the output from the transient TraCE-21ka simulation of the last deglaciation22. This simulation uses the Community Climate System Model version 3 (CCSM3) of the National Center for Atmospheric Research, which is composed of four separate components representing the atmosphere, ocean, land, and sea ice46. The resolution of the atmosphere component is T31 (correspond to a 3.75° transform grid) in the atmosphere, with 26 layers in the vertical, while the ocean and sea-ice components have a nominal resolution of 3° with refined meridional resolution (up to 0.9°) around the equator and 25 levels in the vertical47. Starting from the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM), the model was integrated through the last deglaciation subject to changes in insolation, atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations, continental ice sheets, and meltwater fluxes21. Owing to the anomalous North Atlantic meltwater input, the model simulates a decrease of the AMOC during Heinrich Stadial 1 (HS1) from ca. 13 Sv during the LGM to about 4 Sv during the HS122. For our analysis of HS1 tropical Atlantic surface freshwater flux and mixed layer depth anomalies, we averaged the output fields from 18–15 ka and compared them to the mean LGM state (22–19 ka average).

Correlation analyses

Pearson correlation coefficients between proxy time series and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the PearsonT3 software ( The software estimates the correlation coefficient (r) with accurate bootstrap confidence intervals by accounting for the autocorrelation of the data48. Data sets were re-sampled for the interval 20–10 ka BP (glacial termination which includes Heinrich Stadial 1 and the Younger Dryas) at 0.1-kyr steps on the basis of their original age models to achieve the same timescale.

Full Methods and any associated references are available in the online version of the paper at

Additional Information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Schneider, T., Bischoff, T. & Haug, G. H. Migrations and dynamics of the Intertropical Convergence Zone. Nature 513, 45–53, doi:10.1038/nature13636 (2014).

  2. 2.

    Zhang, D., McPhaden, M. J., Johns, W. E. & Al, Z. E. T. Observational Evidence for Flow between the Subtropical and Tropical Atlantic: The Atlantic Subtropical Cells*. Journal of Physical Oceanography 33, 1783–1797, doi:10.1175/2408.1 (2003).

  3. 3.

    Donohoe, A., Marshall, J., Ferreira, D. & Mcgee, D. The relationship between ITCZ location and cross-equatorial atmospheric heat transport: From the seasonal cycle to the last glacial maximum. Journal of Climate 26, 3597–3618, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00467.1 (2013).

  4. 4.

    Chiang, J. C. H. & Friedman, A. R. Extratropical Cooling, Interhemispheric Thermal Gradients, and Tropical Climate Change. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 40, 383–412, doi:10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105545 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Frierson, D. M. W. et al. Contribution of ocean overturning circulation to tropical rainfall peak in the Northern Hemisphere. Nature Geoscience 6, 940–944, doi:10.1038/ngeo1987 (2013).

  6. 6.

    Mignot, J., de B Montégut, C., Lazar, A. & Cravatte, S. Control of salinity on the mixed layer depth in the world ocean: 2. Tropical areas. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans 112, 1–12 (2007).

  7. 7.

    De Boyer Montégut, C., Mignot, J., Lazar, A. & Cravatte, S. Control of salinity on the mixed layer depth in the world ocean: 1. General description. Journal of Geophysical Research 112, C06011 (2007).

  8. 8.

    Longhurst, A. Seasonal cooling and blooming in tropical oceans. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 40, 2145–2165, doi:10.1016/0967-0637(93)90095-K (1993).

  9. 9.

    Lippold, J. et al. Does sedimentary 231Pa/230Th from the Bermuda Rise monitor past Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation? Geophysical Research Letters 36, 1–6, doi:10.1029/2009GL038068 (2009).

  10. 10.

    McManus, J. F., Francois, R., Gherardi, J.-M., Keigwin, L. D. & Brown-Leger, S. Collapse and rapid resumption of Atlantic meridional circulation linked to deglacial climate changes. Nature 428, 834–7, doi:10.1038/nature02494 (2004).

  11. 11.

    Kageyama, M. et al. Climatic impacts of fresh water hosing under Last Glacial Maximum conditions: a multi-model study. Climate of the Past 9, 935–953, doi:10.5194/cp-9-935-2013 (2013).

  12. 12.

    Jaeschke, A., Rühlemann, C., Arz, H., Heil, G. & Lohmann, G. Coupling of millennial-scale changes in sea surface temperature and precipitation off northeastern Brazil with high-latitude climate shifts during the last glacial period. Paleoceanography 22, n/a–n/a (2007).

  13. 13.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Origin of increased terrigenous supply to the NE South American continental margin during Heinrich Stadial 1 and the Younger Dryas. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 432, 493–500, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2015.09.054 (2015).

  14. 14.

    Cruz, F. W. et al. Orbitally driven east–west antiphasing of South American precipitation. Nature Geoscience 2, 210–214, doi:10.1038/ngeo444 (2009).

  15. 15.

    Peterson, L. C., Haug, G. H., Hughen, K. A. & Röhl, U. Rapid changes in the hydrologic cycle of the tropical Atlantic during the last glacial. Science (New York, NY) 290, 1947–1951, doi:10.1126/science.290.5498.1947 (2000).

  16. 16.

    Cheng, H. et al. Climate change patterns in Amazonia and biodiversity. Nature communications 4, 1411, doi:10.1038/ncomms2415 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Arbuszewski, J. A., DeMenocal, P. B., Cléroux, C., Bradtmiller, L. & Mix, A. Meridional shifts of the Atlantic intertropical convergence zone since the Last Glacial Maximum. Nature Geoscience 6, 959–962, doi:10.1038/ngeo1961 (2013).

  18. 18.

    MGgee, D., Donohoe, A., Marshall, J. & Ferreira, D. Changes in ITCZ location and cross-equatorial heat transport at the Last Glacial Maximum, Heinrich Stadial 1, and the mid-Holocene. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 390, 69–79, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2013.12.043 (2014).

  19. 19.

    Ruhlemann, C., Mulitza, S., Muller, P. J., Wefer, G. & Zahn, R. Warming of the tropical Atlantic Ocean and slowdown of thermohaline circulation during the last deglaciation. Nature 402, 511–514, doi:10.1038/990069 (1999).

  20. 20.

    Hüls, M. & Zahn, R. Millennial-scale sea surface temperature variability in the western tropical North Atlantic from planktonic foraminiferal census counts. Paleoceanography 15, 659–678, doi:10.1029/1999PA000462 (2000).

  21. 21.

    He, F. Simulating transient climate evolution of the last deglaciation with CCSM3. (University of Wisconsin-Madison, 2011).

  22. 22.

    Liu, Z. et al. Transient simulation of last deglaciation with a new mechanism for Bolling-Allerod warming. Science (New York, NY) 325, 310–4, doi:10.1126/science.1171041 (2009).

  23. 23.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Equatorial Pacific forcing of western Amazonian precipitation during Heinrich Stadial 1. Scientific Reports 6, 35866, doi:10.1038/srep35866 (2016).

  24. 24.

    Wang, X. et al. Wet periods in northeastern Brazil over the past 210 kyr linked to distant climate anomalies. Nature 432, 740–3, doi:10.1038/nature03067 (2004).

  25. 25.

    Dupont, L. M. et al. Two-step vegetation response to enhanced precipitation in Northeast Brazil during Heinrich event 1. Global Change Biology 16, 1647–1660, doi:10.1111/gcb.2010.16.issue-6 (2009).

  26. 26.

    Masson, S. & Delecluse, P. Influence of the Amazon River Runoff on the Tropical. Atlantic. 26, 137–142, doi:10.1016/S1464-1909(00)00230-6 (2001).

  27. 27.

    Kucera, M., Rosell-Melé, A., Schneider, R., Waelbroeck, C. & Weinelt, M. Multiproxy approach for the reconstruction of the glacial ocean surface (MARGO). Quaternary Science Reviews 24, 813–819, doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.07.017 (2005).

  28. 28.

    Kucera, M. et al. Reconstruction of sea-surface temperatures from assemblages of planktonic foraminifera: multi-technique approach based on geographically constrained calibration data sets and its application to glacial Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Quaternary Science Reviews 24, 951–998, doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.07.014 (2005).

  29. 29.

    Locarnini, R. A. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2009. In: Levitus, S. (Ed.), temperature, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 68 vol. 1. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 184 pp. (2010).

  30. 30.

    Antonov, J. I. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2009. In: Levitus, S. (Ed.), Salinity, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 69 vol. 2. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 184 pp. (2010).

  31. 31.

    Garcia, H. E. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2009 In: Levitus, S. (Ed.), Dissolved Oxygen, Apparent Oxygen Utilization, and Oxygen Saturation, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 70 vol. 3. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 344 pp. (2010).

  32. 32.

    Garcia, H. E. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2009 n: Levitus, S. (Ed.), Nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, and silicate), NOAA Atlas NESDIS 71 vol. 4. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 398 pp. (2010).

  33. 33.

    Mulitza, S. et al. Response of Amazon sedimentation to deforestation, land use and climate variability – Cruise No. MSM20/3 - February 19 - March 11, 2012 - Recife (Brazil) - Bridgetown (Barbados). Vol. MSM20/3 1-86 (DFG-Senatskommission für Ozeanographie, Bremen, 2013).

  34. 34.

    Stainforth, R. M., Lamb, J. L., Luterbacher, H., Beard, J. H. & Jeffords, R. M. Cenozoic Planktonic Foraminiferal Zonation and Characteristics of Index Formsle. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions. Article 62. 1–425, (The Paleontological Institute, The University of Kansas, 1975).

  35. 35.

    Hemleben, C., Spindler, M. & Anderson, O. R. Modern Planktonic Foraminifera, doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3544-6 (1989).

  36. 36.

    Darling, K. F., Kucera, M., Kroon, D. & Wade, C. M. A resolution for the coiling direction paradox in Neogloboquadrina pachyderma. Paleoceanography 21, PA2011, doi:10.1029/2005PA001189 (2006).

  37. 37.

    Volbers, A. N. A. & Henrich, R. Calcium carbonate corrosiveness in the South Atlantic during the Last Glacial Maximum as inferred from changes in the preservation of Globigerina bulloides: A proxy to determine deep-water circulation patterns? Marine Geology 204, 43–57, doi:10.1016/S0025-3227(03)00372-4 (2004).

  38. 38.

    Stuiver, M. & Reimer, P. J. Extended 14C Data Base and Revised CALIB 3.0 14C Age Calibration Program. Radiocarbon 35, 215–230, doi:10.1017/S0033822200013904 (1993).

  39. 39.

    Reimer, P. IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55, 1869–1887, doi:10.2458/azu_js_rc.55.16947 (2013).

  40. 40.

    Juggins, S. C2 user guide: Software for ecological and palaeoecological data analysis and visualization. (2003).

  41. 41.

    Telford, R. J., Li, C. & Kucera, M. Mismatch between the depth habitat of planktonic foraminifera and the calibration depth of SST transfer functions may bias reconstructions. Climate of the Past 9, 859–870, doi:10.5194/cp-9-859-2013 (2013).

  42. 42.

    Ravelo, A. C., Fairbanks, R. G. & Philander, S. G. H. Reconstructing tropical Atlantic hydrography using planktontic foraminifera and an ocean model. Paleoceanography 5, 409–431, doi:10.1029/PA005i003p00409 (1990).

  43. 43.

    Schmuker, B. & Schiebel, R. Planktic foraminifers and hydrography of the eastern and northern Caribbean Sea. Marine Micropaleontology 46, 387–403, doi:10.1016/S0377-8398(02)00082-8 (2002).

  44. 44.

    Steph, S., Regenberg, M., Tiedemann, R., Mulitza, S. & Nürnberg, D. Stable isotopes of planktonic foraminifera from tropical Atlantic/Caribbean core-tops: Implications for reconstructing upper ocean stratification. Marine Micropaleontology 71, 1–19, doi:10.1016/j.marmicro.2008.12.004 (2009).

  45. 45.

    Weltje, G. J. & Tjallingii, R. Calibration of XRF core scanners for quantitative geochemical logging of sediment cores: Theory and application. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 274, 423–438, doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2008.07.054 (2008).

  46. 46.

    Collins, W. D. et al. The Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3). Journal of Climate 19, 2122–2143, doi:10.1175/JCLI3761.1 (2006).

  47. 47.

    Yeager, S. G., Shields, C. A., Large, W. G. & Hack, J. J. The low-resolution CCSM3. Journal of Climate 19, 2545–2566, doi:10.1175/JCLI3744.1 (2006).

  48. 48.

    Ólafsdóttir, K. B. & Mudelsee, M. More accurate, calibrated bootstrap confidence intervals for estimating the correlation between two time series. Mathematical Geosciences 46, 411–427, doi:10.1007/s11004-014-9523-4 (2014).

  49. 49.

    De Boyer Montégut, C., Madec, G., Fischer, A. S., Lazar, A. & Iudicone, D. Mixed layer depth over the global ocean: An examination of profile data and a profile-based climatology. Journal of Geophysical Research C: Oceans 109, 1–20, doi:10.1029/2004JC002378 (2004).

  50. 50.

    Schlitzer, R. Ocean Data View. (2016).

  51. 51.

    Andersen, K. K. et al. High-resolution record of Northern Hemisphere climate extending into the last interglacial period. Nature 431, 147–51, doi:10.1038/nature02805 (2004).

  52. 52.

    UCAR/NCAR/CISL/TDD. The NCAR Comman Language. doi: (2015).

Download references


Logistical and technical assistance was provided by the Captain and Crew of the R/V Maria S. Merian. R.C.P.-R. acknowledges a scholarship from the Brazilian program Science without Borders- CNPq. C.M.C. acknowledges the financial support from FAPESP (grant 2012/17517–3) and CAPES (grants 1976/2014 and 564/2015). We thank Dongxiao Zhang for valuable feedback about equatorial Atlantic oceanography as well as Bette Otto-Bliesner, Feng He and Zhengyu Liu for making the TraCE-21k model output available via the Earth System Grid (National Center for Atmospheric Research). Sample material has been provided by the GeoB Core Repository at the MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Germany. The data reported in this paper will be archived in in the World Data Center PANGAEA (

Author information

Author notes

    • R. C. Portilho-Ramos

    Present address: Institute of Geosciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil


  1. MARUM - Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany

    • R. C. Portilho-Ramos
    • , Y. Zhang
    • , S. Mulitza
    • , M. Kucera
    • , M. Siccha
    • , M. Prange
    •  & A. Paul
  2. School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

    • C. M. Chiessi


  1. Search for R. C. Portilho-Ramos in:

  2. Search for C. M. Chiessi in:

  3. Search for Y. Zhang in:

  4. Search for S. Mulitza in:

  5. Search for M. Kucera in:

  6. Search for M. Siccha in:

  7. Search for M. Prange in:

  8. Search for A. Paul in:


R.C.P.-R. and S.M. designed the study. R.C.P.-R. analyzed planktonic foraminifera assemblage. R.C.P.-R. and C.M.C. wrote the manuscript. S.M. and C.M.C. selected the location and retrieved gravity core GeoB16206-1. R.C.P.-R., M.K. and M.S. performed the Modern Analogue Technique. C.M.C. and Y.Z. measured XRF data. M.P. and A.P. analyzed model output. M.P. performed correlation analysis. M.S. performed the error of the RN/Gg ratio. Y.Z., C.M.C. and S.M. performed age modeling. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. C. Portilho-Ramos.

Electronic supplementary material


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit