Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) is a non-invasive, three-dimensional imaging tool used in medical imaging, forensic science, industry and engineering, anthropology, and archaeology. The current study used high-resolution medical CT scanning of 431 animal skulls, including 399 dog skulls from 152 breeds, 14 cat skulls from 9 breeds, 14 skulls from 8 wild canid species (gray wolf, golden jackal, coyote, maned wolf, bush dog, red fox, Fennec fox, bat-eared fox), and 4 skulls from 4 wild felid species (wildcat, leopard, serval, caracal). This comprehensive and unique collection of CT image series of skulls can provide a solid foundation not only for comparative anatomical and evolutionary studies but also for the advancement of veterinary education, virtual surgery planning, and the facilitation of training in sophisticated machine learning methodologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Background & Summary
Before the advent of 3D imaging techniques, researchers had to physically visit various collections and handle vulnerable objects to examine their pertinent attributes closely. The adoption of digitized image repositories has dramatically improved access to large samples of specimens from collections, allowing researchers to conduct examinations from their workstations. This capability enables the conducting of analyses on a larger scale than previously undertaken, fostering collaboration and facilitating data sharing among different institutions, thereby expanding the scope of research1,2. Consequently, specimens carefully preserved in natural history or private collections can be made accessible to a diverse range of interested scholars3. Moreover, digital technologies (e.g., the estimation of cranial cavity volume using glass beads or water is substituted with digital endocasting) may replace traditional methods, offering a more accurate and secure means of inspection4,5.
Computed tomography (CT) stands out as a widely employed technique for digitizing specimens. CT, a potent three-dimensional imaging technique, enables non-invasive visualization of internal structures6. In veterinary medicine, CT scans are particularly useful for detecting various conditions such as diverse orthopedic conditions (like fractures, arthrosis, congenital disorders), nasal diseases, head traumas, lung diseases, middle and inner ear disorders, dental diseases or certain tumors7. Due to its non-destructive nature, CT can be a useful and indispensable tool for digitizing vulnerable specimens in natural science collections3,8. It is important to be aware of the difference between the nature of CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MR), as CT is superior in analyzing osseous structures, while MR is particularly useful for examining soft tissue characteristics.
The skull, recognized as the most intricate bone in the body, exhibits substantial variation in form across species and breeds, encompassing a wide range in thickness and density (e.g., from the teeth and petrosal bone to the delicate ethmoturbinates). Evolutionary and comparative studies can leverage characteristic craniometric measurements to illustrate changes in specific areas (e.g., maxillofacial region, nasal cavity, the paranasal sinus system, teeth arrangement, depth, and angle of the orbital, inner and outer neurocranial properties)9,10,11.
Having gained unique access to a private collection comprising hundreds of individual carnivore skulls, we conducted meticulous CT scans on 431 canid and felid species. This dataset holds multifaceted utility, such as our exploration of digital endocasting12 and investigation into brain size evolution during domestication among dog breeds13. This unique collection of high-quality CT scans of canid and felid skulls is of interest to many scientific or educational fields, and its wide-ranging potential makes it worth sharing with a knowledgeable audience.
The extensive collection of skulls at our disposal presents a valuable opportunity to investigate the anatomical variations among canids and felids, both within and between breeds or species14,15,16,17,18, or certain cranial regions19,20 (e.g., for comparative morphometrics or to test evolutionary hypotheses). Furthermore, the particular set of species and breeds involved allows for examining the implications of domestication13,21. By exploring prospects in education, the usability of our CT images can be extended beyond the research domain. The application of CT images, stored in appropriate medical file formats, provides a robust foundation for 3D visualization, segmentation, and even 3D printing while serving as a basis for developing deep learning methods and algorithms22,23. According to Silvera et al.24, incorporating interactive virtual 3D skull models and skull replicas can prove invaluable in veterinary anatomy education.
Methods
Subjects
A total of 431 skulls were scanned, including 399 skulls from 152 dog (Canis familiaris) breeds, 14 skulls from 9 cat (Felis catus) breeds, 14 skulls from 8 wild canid species (Otocyon megalotis, Speothos venaticus, Canis latrans, Vulpes zerda, Canis aureus, Canis lupus, Chrysocyon brachyurus, Vulpes vulpes), and 4 skulls from 4 wild felid species (Caracal caracal, Panthera pardus, Leptailurus serval, Felis silvestris) (Table 1).
The list of the dog breeds (1–9 skulls/breed, see Table S1): Affenpinscher, Afghan Hound, Airedale Terrier, Akita Inu, Alaskan Malamute, American Bulldog, American Pit Bull Terrier, Australian Shepherd, Australian Terrier, Bandog, Basenji, Basset Hound, Beagle, Beauceron (Beauce Sheep Dog), Bedlington Terrier, Belgian Shepherd Dog (Groenendael), Belgian Shepherd Dog (Tervueren), Berger Picard (Picardy shepherd), Bernese Mountain Dog (Berner Sennenhund), Bichon Frisé, Black Russian Terrier, Bolognese, Border Collie, Border Terrier, Borzoi, Boston Terrier, Boxer, Briard, Brittany (French Brittany), Bucovina Shepherd Dog (Southeastern European Shepherd), Bull Terrier, Bulldog, Bullmastiff, Cairn Terrier, Canadian Eskimo Dog, Canary Mastiff (Perro de Presa Canario), Cane Corso, Caucasian Shepherd Dog, Cavalier King Charles Spaniel, Central Asian Shepherd Dog (Ovtcharka), Chihuahua, Chinese Crested Dog, Chow Chow, Collie (Rough), Coton de Tulear, Czechoslovakian Wolfdog, Dachshund (Short-haired), Dachshund (Wire-haired), Dalmatian, Doberman Pinscher, Dogo Argentino, Dogue de Bordeaux, English Cocker Spaniel, English Mastiff, English Pointer, English Setter, English Springer Spaniel, Fila Brasileiro, Fox Terrier (Smooth), Fox Terrier (Wire-haired), French Bulldog, French Pointing Dog (Braque Francais, type Gascogne), German Pointer (Wire-haired), German Shepherd Dog (Alsatian), German Shepherd Dog, Long-haired (Alsatian, Long-haired; Old German Shepherd Dog), German Spaniel, Giant German Spitz, Giant Schnauzer, Golden Retriever, Gordon Setter, Grand Anglo-Français Blanc et Noir, Great Dane, Great Pyrenees (Pyrenean Mountain Dog), Greater Swiss Mountain Dog, Greenland Dog, Greyhound, Griffon Bruxellois, Hanover Hound, Havanese, Hovawart, Hungarian Greyhound, Irish Setter, Irish Wolfhound, Italian Greyhound, Jack Russell Terrier, Japanese Chin, Keeshond (Wolfspitz), Kerry Blue Terrier, King Charles Spaniel, Komondor, Kuvasz, Labrador Retriever, Landseer, Large Münsterländer, Leonberger, Lhasa Apso, Maltese, Medium German Spitz, Medium Poodle, Miniature Bull Terrier, Miniature German Spitz, Miniature Pinscher, Miniature Poodle, Miniature Schnauzer, Moscow Watchdog, Mudi, Neapolitan Mastiff (Mastino Napoletano), Newfoundland, Norwegian Hound (Dunker), Old English Sheepdog (Bobtail), Papillon (Continental Toy Spaniel), Pekingese, Peruvian Hairless Dog, Polish Hound, Pomeranian, Portuguese Sheepdog (Cão da Serra de Aires), Pug, Puli, Pumi, Pyrenean Mastiff, Rhodesian Ridgeback, Rottweiler, Saluki, Samoyed, Schapendoes (Dutch Sheepdog), Scottish Deerhound, Scottish Terrier, Serbian Hound, Shar Pei, Shetland Sheepdog, Shih Tzu, Siberian Husky, Small Münsterländer, Spanish Sighthound (Galgo Español), St. Bernard, Staffordshire Bull Terrier, Standard Poodle, Standard Schnauzer, Tibetan Mastiff, Tibetan Terrier, Tosa, Transylvanian Hound, Vizsla, Weimaraner, Welsh Corgi (Cardigan), Welsh Corgi (Pembroke), Welsh Terrier, West Highland White Terrier, Whippet, White Swiss Shepherd Dog (Berger Blanc Suisse, White German Shepherd, White Shepherd), Yorkshire Terrier, Yugoslavian Shepherd Dog (Šarplaninac).
The list of cat breeds (1-2 skulls/breed, Table S1): Abyssinian, Birman, British shorthair, European shorthair, Himalayan, Maine coon, Scottish fold, Siamese, Sphynx.
The collection of skulls
The skulls are part of a collection of author TC. He obtained the skulls through private donations from cadavers over the past decades for educational purposes in teaching anatomy. Later, as his collection of skulls evolved, he began to systematically look for rare breeds and species. The animals had died of old age or disease or were euthanized by their owner for medical reasons, irrespective of the present study. Skulls were macerated, degreased, and dried out. Each skull has a unique identifier based on which the species, the breed (and, if it was known, the sex) can be accessed (Table S1). The age of the animals was unknown, but the ossification of their cranial sutures and the eruption of the permanent teeth confirmed that they were adult individuals.
Image acquisition
Skulls were transported to Moritz Kaposi Teaching Hospital Dr. Jozsef Baka Diagnostic, Radiation Oncology, Research and Teaching Center (Medicopus Nonprofit Ltd.) for the scanning procedure. We used a medical CT device (Siemens Somatom Definition AS+ CT, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), and we selected a setting on the scanner that provided the best image quality with an Ultra High Resolution (UHR) protocol. Acquisition parameters were set as: 200 mAs exposure, 140 kV tube voltage, 16 × 0.6 mm collimation, and spiral data collection with 0.85 pitch factor to digitize the bones (Fig. 1). The name of this specific Siemens’ examination setting protocol is “UHR,” which stands for “ultra-high resolution”. This setting is applied to small examination areas such as the human inner ear and optic nerve imaging. Using this setting resulted in a longer imaging duration and higher radiation exposure, but considering the technical possibilities, it produced the best possible contrast ratios and spatial resolution. The benefit of using the medical CT with the UHR option was the time optimization for scanning a large number of specimens. In contrast to using an industrial micro-CT scanner, where the scanning process of one skull takes about 40–45 minutes (including scanning and reconstruction), the speed of the medical CT was approximately 5-6 minutes per skull. In some cases, a piece of polyurethane foam was placed under the skull (below the basioccipital bone) to stabilize and straighten its position during scanning.
Image reconstruction and conversion
Overlapping axial scans were reconstructed from the collected raw data using the Siemens Somaris/7 Syngo CT software program (ver. VA48A) with v80u convolution kernel and osteo window (very sharp). The resolution of the images was pixel size 0.3 × 0.3 mm, slice thickness 0.6 mm and reconstruction increment 0.3 mm. The images were archived in DICOM (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine) format. Further image acquisition and reconstruction parameters can be found in text files located in the ‘DICOM headers’ folder of the shared dataset. Afterwards, the multislice volumes were converted to one NIfTI (Neuroimaging Informatics Technology Initiative) file per subject (resulting in a smaller file size due to the conversion but maintaining the image quality). Each file name was constructed based on the data listed in Table S1 to aid easier navigation and selection. The first three numbers refer to the species ID, the A-B-C characters refer to the sex (A: male, B: female, C: unknown), and the last 3-4 characters are the short breed identifier (ID). When multiple species with the same breed and sex occurred, an increasing counting number was added to the sex ID. These three IDs in the file name are separated with underscores. For example, the 026_A_BORD.nii.gz file refers to a male border collie. NIfTI-files are located in the ‘Skull volumes’ folder of the shared data.
Volume cropping and viewport save
To generate an overview of the image volumes (without the necessity to download them for inspection of suitability), a further post-processing step was carried out. Volumes were cropped to remove extraneous surrounding regions (the space around the skulls), and screenshots were generated from six primary perspectives of the volume-rendered CT image series, resulting in left, right, front, back, top, and bottom views (Fig. 2). All of these images were created using 3D Slicer25, which can be found in the ‘Thumbnail images’ folder of the dataset.
Data Records
The dataset is available on FigShare26, where skull volumes, DICOM headers and thumbnail image files can be downloaded in zip-archive files. It is also available on ELTE’s Cloud server (https://nc.elte.hu/s/doZnwPjgeBaZ7as), where files can be downloaded individually. Both repositories contain a summary table .xls file with the Individual IDs, Species/Breed IDs, Sex, Species, Latin species names, Breed, and Breed abbreviations (also attached as Table S1), and a video illustrating the database (Video S1). The video is also available through this link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wE5elULOfWk.
Technical Validation
Every image was carefully examined by a skilled CT operator (TD) and two veterinary anatomists (KC, ÖP,) to ensure that the image quality meets the desired standards, it is devoid of artefacts and possesses adequate contrast for the purpose of image analysis. The whole process was carried out according to the ISO 9001:2015 quality management system and ISO 14001:2015 environmental management system.
Code availability
No custom code has been used for this study.
References
Hedrick, B. P. et al. Digitization and the Future of Natural History Collections. BioScience 70, 243–251 (2020).
Nelson, G. & Ellis, S. The history and impact of digitization and digital data mobilization on biodiversity research. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 374, 20170391 (2018).
Copes, L. E., Lucas, L. M., Thostenson, J. O., Hoekstra, H. E. & Boyer, D. M. A collection of non-human primate computed tomography scans housed in MorphoSource, a repository for 3D data. Sci. Data 3, 160001 (2016).
Kubo, D., Kono, R. T., Saso, A., Mizushima, S. & Suwa, G. Accuracy and precision of CT-based endocranial capacity estimations: a comparison with the conventional millet seed method and application to the Minatogawa 1 skull. Anthropol. Sci. 116, 77–85 (2008).
Digital Endocasts: From Skulls to Brains. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56582-6 (Springer Japan, 2018).
Computed Tomography: A Primer for Radiographers. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2022).
Keane, M. et al. Computed Tomography in Veterinary Medicine: Currently Published and Tomorrow’s Vision. in Computed Tomography - Advanced Applications (IntechOpen, 2017).
Lynnerup, N. Computed Tomography Scanning and Three-Dimensional Visualization of Mummies and Bog Bodies. in Advances in Human Palaeopathology 101–119 (John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2007).
Dias, P. et al. CraMs: Craniometric Analysis Application Using 3D Skull Models. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 35, 11–17 (2015).
Toneva, D., Nikolova, S., Georgiev, I. & Tchorbadjieff, A. Accuracy of Linear Craniometric Measurements Obtained from Laser Scanning Created 3D Models of Dry Skulls. in Advanced Computing in Industrial Mathematics: Revised Selected Papers of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Bulgarian Section of SIAM December 21-22, 2015, Sofia, Bulgaria (eds. Georgiev, K., Todorov, M. & Georgiev, I.) 215–229 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017).
Henneberg, M., Simpson, E. & Stephan, C. Human Face in Biological Anthropology: Craniometry, Evolution and Forensic Identification. in The Human Face: Measurement and Meaning (ed. Katsikitis, M.) 29–48 (Springer US, Boston, MA, 2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1063-5_2.
Czeibert, K., Sommese, A., Petneházy, Ö., Csörgő, T. & Kubinyi, E. Digital endocasting in comparative canine brain morphology. Front. Vet. Sci. 7, (2020).
Garamszegi, L. Z. et al. Evolution of relative brain size in dogs—no effects of selection for breed function, litter size, or longevity. Evolution 77, 1591–1606 (2023).
Curth, S., Fischer, M. S. & Kupczik, K. Patterns of integration in the canine skull: an inside view into the relationship of the skull modules of domestic dogs and wolves. Zoology 125, 1–9 (2017).
Mahdy, M. A. A. & Mohamed, W. F. Comparative craniometric measurements of two Canid species in Egypt: the Egyptian red fox and the Egyptian Baladi dog. BMC Vet. Res. 18, 173 (2022).
Selba, M. C., Bryson, E. R., Rosenberg, C. L., Heng, H. G. & DeLeon, V. B. Selective breeding in domestic dogs: How selecting for a short face impacted canine neuroanatomy. Anat. Rec. 304, 101–115 (2021).
Schmidt, M. J. et al. The Relationship between Brachycephalic Head Features in Modern Persian Cats and Dysmorphologies of the Skull and Internal Hydrocephalus. J. Vet. Intern. Med. 31, 1487–1501 (2017).
Gündemir, O. et al. Examination of Shape Variation of the Skull in British Shorthair, Scottish Fold, and Van Cats. Animals 13, 614 (2023).
Jacquemetton, C., Drexler, A., Kellerman, G., Bird, D. & Van Valkenburgh, B. The impact of extreme skull morphology in domestic dogs on cribriform plate shape. Anat. Rec. 304, 190–201 (2021).
Schweizer, A. V. et al. Size Variation under Domestication: Conservatism in the inner ear shape of wolves, dogs and dingoes. Sci. Rep. 7, 13330 (2017).
Bird, D. J., Jacquemetton, C., Buelow, S. A., Evans, A. W. & Van Valkenburgh, B. Domesticating olfaction: Dog breeds, including scent hounds, have reduced cribriform plate morphology relative to wolves. Anat. Rec. 304, 139–153 (2021).
Giannopoulos, A. A. & Pietila, T. Post-processing of DICOM Images. in 3D Printing in Medicine: A Practical Guide for Medical Professionals (eds. Rybicki, F. J. & Grant, G. T.) 23–34 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017).
Hoopes, A., Mora, J. S., Dalca, A. V., Fischl, B. & Hoffmann, M. SynthStrip: skull-stripping for any brain image. NeuroImage 260, 119474 (2022).
da Silveira, E. E. et al. Canine Skull Digitalization and Three-Dimensional Printing as an Educational Tool for Anatomical Study. J. Vet. Med. Educ. 48, 649–655 (2021).
Kikinis, R., Pieper, S. D. & Vosburgh, K. G. 3D Slicer: A Platform for Subject-Specific Image Analysis, Visualization, and Clinical Support. in Intraoperative Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy (ed. Jolesz, F. A.) 277–289 (Springer, New York, NY, 2014).
Czeibert, K. et al. High-resolution computed tomographic (HRCT) image series from 413 canid and 18 felid skulls. figshare. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.7296568 (2024).
Acknowledgements
The study was supported by the Hungarian Academy of Sciences via a grant to the MTA-ELTE ‘Lendület/Momentum’ Companion Animal Research Group (grant no. PH1404/21), the National Brain Programme 3.0 (NAP2022-I-3/2022), the Hungarian Ethology Society, National Research, Development and Innovation Office (grant no. 2019-2.1.11-TÉT-2020-00109), the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness in Spain (CGL2015-70639-P), and the Swedish Research Council (grant no. 2021-04476 and 2016-03435). Open access funding was provided by ELTE Eötvös Loránd University.
Funding
Open access funding provided by Eötvös Loránd University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.C.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Visualization. G.N.: Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing. T.C.: Resources, Writing - Review & Editing. T.D.: Methodology, Validation, Writing - Review & Editing. Ö.P.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Writing - Review & Editing. Á.C.: Methodology, Software, Writing - Review & Editing, Visualization. L.Z.G.: Conceptualization, Writing - Review & Editing, Funding acquisition. N.K.: Conceptualization, Writing - Review & Editing, Funding acquisition. E.K.: Conceptualization, Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Czeibert, K., Nagy, G., Csörgő, T. et al. High-resolution computed tomographic (HRCT) image series from 413 canid and 18 felid skulls. Sci Data 11, 753 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03572-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03572-x