Abstract
The common vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus) is a sanguivorous (i.e., blood-eating) bat species distributed in the Americas from northern Mexico southwards to central Chile and Argentina. Desmodus rotundus is one of only three mammal species known to feed exclusively on blood, mainly from domestic mammals, although large wildlife and occasionally humans can also serve as a food source. Blood feeding makes D. rotundus an effective transmissor of pathogens to its prey. Consequently, this species is a common target of culling efforts by various individuals and organizations. Nevertheless, little is known about the historical distribution of D. rotundus. Detailed occurrence data are critical for the accurate assessment of past and current distributions of D. rotundus as part of ecological, biogeographical, and epidemiological research. This article presents a dataset of D. rotundus historical occurrence reports, including >39,000 locality reports across the Americas to facilitate the development of spatiotemporal studies of the species. Data are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15025296.
Measurement(s) | occurrence report |
Technology Type(s) | digital curation |
Sample Characteristic - Organism | Desmodus rotundus |
Sample Characteristic - Location | North America • South America |
Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.18745316
Similar content being viewed by others
Background & Summary
The common vampire bat, Desmodus rotundus (É. Geoffroy, 1810) is a member of the family Phyllostomidae, subfamily Desmodontinae1. Desmodus rotundus is endemic to the Neotropics, where it occurs from northern Mexico, through all of Central America, and across most of South America2,3. Desmodus rotundus is found over an elevational range from sea level up to 3600 m in the Andes mountains4. Two subspecies are recognized: D. r. rotundus (Trinidad and Tobago, Colombia, Venezuela, the Guianas, Ecuador, Peru, Brazil, Bolivia, Paraguay, Argentina, Uruguay, and central Chile) and D. r. murinus (Mexico, Central America, northern and western Colombia, and western Andean slopes in Ecuador and Peru)2. Desmodus rotundus is a strictly sanguivorous species that feeds mainly on the blood of medium to large-bodied terrestrial mammals and some birds5. While groups such as humans and cattle are not natural prey of D. rotundus, they have been documented as being fed upon by this species6,7. The most common prey species of D. rotundus are peccaries, deer, tapirs, horses, cattle, pigs, and goats, and to a lesser extent, species such as chickens, dogs, and sea lions4,8,9,10.
Desmodus rotundus uses various landscapes throughout its broader geographic distribution, including open grasslands, savannas, tropical, subtropical, and dry forests, and even desert environments2,8,11,12,13,14,15. Desmodus rotundus can also adapt to different landcover types, and has been found not only in patches of old-growth or undisturbed forests, but also in disturbed areas such as agroforestry plots, silvopastoral systems, pastures, and secondary forests13,16,17. Desmodus rotundus usually roosts in small groups, from as few as 10 to a few hundred individuals, but can also be found roosting in groups of up to a few thousand individuals2. Desmodus rotundus also uses a variety of roosts, including tree holes, crevices, caves, and abandoned mines and houses2. The conservation status of D. rotundus was defined as of “Least Concern” in 2015 by the International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species, as it is presumed to be a common species with large and stable populations18.
Desmodus rotundus can act as a natural reservoir for various microorganisms with zoonotic potential, such as bacteria, including Bartonella spp.19, coronaviruses20,21, and rabies virus12,22. Bartonella spp. bacteria are globally distributed and have been known to cause endocarditis in humans and other animals19,23,24. Endocarditis is an infection of the inner lining of the heart, and can potentially be lethal23,24. Furthermore, several variations of coronaviruses have been identified in D. rotundus20,25. In the Americas, bats are considered to be a key reservoir of the rabies virus26,27, with D. rotundus being the main species responsible for transmitting rabies to livestock28. It has been estimated that bovine rabies transmitted by vampire bats causes the death of thousands of cattle annually, resulting in economic losses of hundreds of millions of dollars in Latin America29,30. Indirect costs associated with D. rotundus related rabies include the vaccination of millions of cattle as a preventative measure, and post-exposure treatments (rabies immunoglobulin serums and vaccination) for people exposed to D. rotundus bites29,30. The perpetuation of rabies in livestock may also be associated with the abundance and distribution of D. rotundus28,31,32, as sex-related (male) dispersal may contribute to the expansion of rabies virus into new areas33. Thus, the addition of livestock to the landscape promotes suitable conditions for D. rotundus breeding and feeding28,34,35,36.
Due to its reservoir status for potential pathogens, D. rotundus is considered to be a major public health problem in the tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas. Public health concerns are particularly prevalent in Amazonian regions, where many people live in vulnerable housing37,38 and human diseases transmitted by D. rotundus remain high39. In fact, since 2020, rabies has been included in the World Health Organization 2021–2030 road map as a zoonotic disease, and now requires coordination of mitigation strategies at the regional, national, and global levels40,41. Numerous outbreaks in rural human communities have been reported in Amazonian regions, including Peru42, Brazil6,43, and French Guiana7,44.
Several Latin American countries have developed programs to reduce the number of D. rotundus bites to humans and livestock45. Culling campaigns to reduce D. rotundus populations; however, have not proven useful in reducing the seroprevalence of rabies within vampire bat colonies46. It has been suggested that D. rotundus geographic distributional expansion is linked to landscape heterogeneity, degradation, and agricultural aggregations13,37,47. Nevertheless, an increase of suitable areas under future climatic scenarios may contribute to the increased risk of rabies in some regions of the Americas34. The study and analysis of D. rotundus occurrence data are, therefore, critical for the development of preventive measures for vampire-transmitted rabies48,49. This article presents a comprehensive dataset of curated historical occurrence reports of D. rotundus across the Americas to facilitate spatiotemporal modeling and other relevant D. rotundus research. The dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15025296 [Ref. 50].
Methods
Data gathering for this dataset began in January 2020 and ended in December 2021. Occurrence reports of D. rotundus were collected from a variety of publicly available resources and databases, from a network of natural history museums across North, Central, and South America, from official repositories in ministries of agriculture and health, from published scientific literature across Latin America, and from privately held databases from individual contributors (Fig. 1). The final dataset includes 39120 individual occurrence reports (i.e., recorded instances where one or more D. rotundus individuals were recorded or observed) (Fig. 2) and 7576 unique geographic locations of D. rotundus existence. All data were collected in Darwin Core Archive format51. The Darwin Core Archive is a biodiversity and taxonomy based data definition format that makes use of standardized terms and file structures51. The use of the Darwin Core Archive allows for better data accessibility and mobilizations, as well as facilitates the data’s compliance with intercommunity standars51,52. Desmodus rotundus occurrence reports were geo-referenced using the World Geodetic System 1984 coordinate system in decimal degree units. Inclusion criteria for this dataset were:
-
A)
That the report consisted of the modern species Desmodus rotundus1.
-
B)
The report consisted of at least one individual.
-
C)
The report had a recorded geographic coordinate (e.g., latitude and longitude), or a detailed locality description from which the occurrence could be geolocated (i.e., at finer detail beyond municipality level).
-
D)
The report was from a validatable database, museum record, published piece of literature, machine recording (e.g., acoustic monitor or camera), human observation, preserved specimen, or live specimen.
Metadata such as individual count (i.e., number of individuals recorded at each occurrence location, which may vary based on how the original report was collected), specimen age or life stage, basis of record, and date of capture were collected for each report whenever possible (Fig. 3). For occurrence reports where full metadata were not available or unable to be confirmed, the information was left blank in the final file (Supplementary Materials). Definitions for the database and metadata can be found in Online-only Table 1. After data gathering and technical validation the dataset was published in the Figshare data repository for public access (available at: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15025296)50.
Data Records
To collect occurrence reports from published literature, a review was conducted of all publications available in the Web of Science literary repository on August 28, 2020 (ClarivateTM, 2020. available from: https://apps.webofknowledge.com/Search). We conducted a keyword search of topics in journal manuscripts, proceedings papers, and official reports. Keywords included “Desmodus rotundus”, “vampire bat”, and “common vampire bat”, and resulted in 315 manuscripts. The resulting manuscripts in Spanish, English, and Portuguese were then screened for associated D. rotundus occurrence data. A summary of these literature data sources can be found in Online-only Table 2. Additional reports were obtained from 37 institutions or researchers with privately held data. These contributors are summarized in Online-only Table 3. Data curation and validation followed the standardized protocol used for other data sources (see Technical Validation).
Occurrence reports were also collected from publicly available data repositories or databanks (i.e., web-based sources which centrally house data from other sources)53. These repositories included the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF)54, Biodiversidata55, and speciesLink56. Occurrence reports for D. rotundus were downloaded from the GBIF on October 30, 202054. GBIF occurrence reports with coordinates which were located in the western hemisphere (n = 12865) were downloaded from the database in Darwin Core Archive format51. Occurrence reports based on fossil specimens (n = 3) were removed. After the cleaning and validation process (see Technical Validation), the final number of occurrences from GBIF was 12736. Originating datasets which contributed to the GBIF download are summarized in the Supplementary Materials. Occurrence reports from Biodiversidata (Uruguayan Consortium of Biodiversity Data Repository)55 were downloaded in December of 2020 from the vertebrate mammal sub dataset (n = 67)55. Occurrence reports from speciesLink (Centro de Referência em Informação Ambiental) were downloaded in August of 2021 (n = 2578). Of these reports, 918 were found to be already present in the GBIF database. In total, 1660 occurrences from speciesLink were added to the final dataset. A total of 298 occurrence reports without recorded coordinates were also downloaded from the publicly available data repositories and 48 of these reports were able to be georeferenced based on their locality descriptions. The other 250 could not be located due to a lack of detail in their locality descriptions and were therefore excluded. Georeferencing was completed using the tidygeocoder package in R57. All data are stored in the finalized dataset in the Figshare data repository for public access50.
Technical Validation
To validate the collected data, we identified “redundant” reports (i.e., unique reports present in more than one dataset repository). Occurrence reports were flagged as redundant when the occurrence geolocation information (i.e., latitude, longitude, locality, and elevation) and institutional information (e.g., institutional identification number, originating dataset, institutional code, etc.) were identical. Other metadata such as date of occurrence, individual count, sex, life stage, and basis of record were used to confirm or reject redundancy. Reports where these variables matched were flagged and manually investigated to confirm redundancy. When redundant reports were found and confirmed, the original source occurrence report was retained. This process was completed using the dyplr package and base functions such as duplicate and unique in R58,59.
All occurrence reports were also investigated to eliminate occurrences with errors in geolocation using the coordinateCleaner package60. Using the functions cc_cap, cc_cen, cc_gbif, and cc_inst, we identified and removed occurrence reports which were erroneously assigned to country capitals, country centroids, or the GBIF/Biological Institution headquarters60. We also used cc_zero and cc_val functions to identify and remove reports with 0 latitude and 0 longitude as the geographic coordinates, or other invalid geographic coordinates (i.e., non-numeric or not possible coordinates such as Northern latitudes over 90°)60. The remaining occurrences were then visualized in geographic space. Occurrence reports which were located outside of the American continents (i.e., in the ocean) were identified and flagged. These occurrences were then investigated manually for errors. Coordinates that were identified as suspicious spatial outliers (>500 km from their nearest neighbor) were validated by contacting the publishing institution or individual (e.g., the natural history museum, collection, or author). Mapping was done using the package ggplot2 in R and ArcGIS Pro software59,61,62.
Usage Notes
This occurrence report dataset includes both geographic and temporal information on the presence of D. rotundus. This information could be used to assess the distribution of the species retrospectively. Additionally, D. rotundus data could be coupled with environmental data to conduct ecological studies of the environmental tolerances of the species, landscape use, behavior, and prey availability. Future studies could also use this dataset to assess how D. rotundus distribution has changed over time and how distributional changes could be linked to climate and land cover change. Other potential applications of this dataset include the study of rabies reservoirs, which could aid in the understanding of rabies outbreaks. Epidemiological forecasting using D. rotundus data could serve to address gaps in current rabies prevention plans and could facilitate targeted social outreach and vaccination to vulnerable communities.
Code availability
Data, metadata descriptions, and R code are available in the Figshare data repository for public access (accessible from: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15025296)50.
References
Geoffrey, E. Sur les Phyllostomes et les Megadermes, deux Genres de la famille des Chauve-souris. in Annales du Museum d’histoire (ed. Dufour, G.) vol. 15, 181 (d’Ocagne, 1810).
Wilson, D. E. & Mittermeier, R. A. Bats. in Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. (eds. Wilson, D. E. & Mittermeier, R. A.) 1008 (Springer International Publishing, 2019).
Hilaire, É. G. S., Pupuya, I. D. E., Del, R. & Higgins, L. B. O. Ampliación del rango de distribución sur de Desmodus rotundus. Boletín del Mus. Nac. Hist. Nat. 68, 5–12 (2019).
Kwon, M. & Gardner, A. L. Subfamily Desmodontinae. in Mammals of South America, Volume 1: Marsupials, Xenarthrans, Shrews and Bats (ed. Gardner, A. L.) 218–223 (The University of Chicago Press, 2008).
Arellano-Sota, C. Vampire bat-transmitted rabies in cattle. Rev. Infect. Dis. 10, 707–709 (1988).
Fernandes, M. E. B., Da Costa, L. J. C., De Andrade, F. A. G. & Silva, L. P. Rabies in humans and non-human in the state of Pará, Brazilian Amazon. Brazilian J. Infect. Dis. 17, 251–253 (2013).
Andrade, F. A. G., Franca, E. S., Souza, V. P., Barreto, M. S. O. D. & Fernandes, M. E. B. Spatial and temporal analysis of attacks by common vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus) on humans in the rural Brazilian Amazon basin. Acta Chiropterologica 17, 393–400 (2015).
Greenhall, A. M., Joermann, G. & Schmidt, U. Desmodus rotundus. Mamm. Species 202, 1–6 (1983).
Herrera, L. G., Fleming, T. H. & Sternberg, L. S. Trophic relationships in a neotropical bat community: A preliminary study using carbon and nitrogen isotopic signatures. Trop. Ecol. 39, 23–29 (1998).
Dantas Torres, F., Valença, C. & De Andrade Filho, G. V. First record of Desmodus rotundus in urban area from the city of Olinda, Pernambuco, Northeastern Brazil: A case report. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 47, 107–108 (2005).
Flores-Crespo, R. & Arellano-Sota, C. Biology and control of the vampire bat. in The natural history of rabies (ed. Baer, G. M.) 461–476 (CRC Press Inc, 1991).
Flores-Crespo, R. & Arellano-Sota, C. Biology and control of the vampire bat. Nat. Hist. Rabies, 2nd Ed. 10, 461–476 (2017).
Bolívar-Cimé, B., Flores-Peredo, R., García-Ortíz, S. A., Murrieta-Galindo, R. & Laborde, J. Influence of landscape structure on the abundance of Desmodus rotundus (Geoffroy 1810) in Northeastern Yucatan, Mexico. Ecosistemas y Recur. Agropecu. 6, 263 (2019).
Koopman, K. F. Systematics and distribution. in Natural History of Vampire Bats (eds. Greenhall, A. M. & Schmidt, U.) 4–28 (CRC Press, 1988).
Dalquest, W. W. Natural history of the vampire bats of Eastern Mexico. Am. Midl. Nat. 53, 79–87 (1955).
Kalko, E. K. V. & Handley, C. O. Neotropical bats in the canopy: Diversity, community structure, and implications for conservation. Plant Ecol. 153, 319–333 (2001).
García-Morales, R., Badano, E. I. & Moreno, C. E. Response of neotropical bat assemblages to human land use. Conserv. Biol. 27, 1096–1106 (2013).
Barquez, R.M., Perez, S., Miller, B. & Diaz, M. M. Desmodus rotundus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015 e.T6510A21979045, https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-4.RLTS.T6510A21979045.en (2015).
Becker, D. J. et al. Genetic diversity, infection prevalence, and possible transmission routes of Bartonella spp. in vampire bats. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 12, e0006786 (2018).
Brandão, P. E. et al. A coronavirus detected in the vampire bat Desmodus rotundus. Brazilian J. Infect. Dis. 12, 466–468 (2008).
Alves, R. S. et al. Detection of coronavirus in vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus) in southern Brazil. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 00, 1–6 (2021).
Rocha, F. & Dias, R. A. The common vampire bat Desmodus rotundus (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) and the transmission of the rabies virus to livestock: A contact network approach and recommendations for surveillance and control. Prev. Vet. Med. 174, e104809 (2020).
Raoult, D. et al. Diagnosis of 22 new cases of Bartonella endocarditis. Ann. Intern. Med. 125, 646–652 (1996).
Raoult, D. et al. Outcome and treatment of Bartonella endocarditis. Arch. Int. Med. 163, 226–230 (2003).
Neely, B. A. et al. Surveying the vampire bat (Desmodus rotundus) serum proteome: A resource for identifying immunological proteins and detecting pathogens. J. Proteome Res. 20, 2547–2559 (2021).
Rupprecht, C. E., Hanlon, C. A. & Hemachudha, T. Rabies re-examined. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2, 327–343 (2002).
World Health Organization. Rabies. WHO https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/rabies (2020).
Lee, D. N., Papeş, M. & Van Den Bussche, R. A. Present and potential future distribution of common vampire bats in the Americas and the associated risk to cattle. PLoS One 7, e42466 (2012).
Acha, P. N. & Malaga-Alba, A. Economic losses due to Desmodus rotundus. in Natural History of Vampire Bats (eds. Greenhall, A. M. & Schmidt, U.) 207–214 (CRC Press, 1968).
Kotait, I. & Gonçalves, C. Manual Técnico MAPA - Controle da raiva dos herbívoros in Manual técnico dos herbívoros (Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento, 2009).
Johnson, N., Aréchiga-Ceballos, N. & Aguilar-Setien, A. Vampire bat rabies: Ecology, epidemiology and control. Viruses 6, 1911–1928 (2014).
Blackwood, J. C., Streicker, D. G., Altizer, S. & Rohani, P. Resolving the roles of immunity, pathogenesis, and immigration for rabies persistence in vampire bats. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 110, 20837–20842 (2013).
Streicker, D. G. et al. Host-pathogen evolutionary signatures reveal dynamics and future invasions of vampire bat rabies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 10926–10931 (2016).
Zarza, H., Martínez-Meyer, E., Suzán, G. & Ceballos, G. Geographic distribution of Desmodus rotundus in Mexico under current and future climate change scenarios: Implications for bovine paralytic rabies infection. Vet. Mex. 4, 3–16 (2017).
Hayes, M. A. & Piaggio, A. J. Assessing the potential impacts of a changing climate on the distribution of a rabies virus vector. PLoS One 13, e0192887 (2018).
Nunez, G. B., Becker, D. J., Lawrence, R. L. & Plowright, R. K. Synergistic effects of grassland fragmentation and temperature on bovine rabies emergence. EcoHealth 17, 203–216 (2020).
da Rosa, E. S. T. et al. Bat-transmitted human rabies outbreaks, Brazilian Amazon. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 12, 1197–1202 (2006).
Rocha, S. M., de Oliveira, S. V., Heinemann, M. B. & Gonçalves, V. S. P. Epidemiological profile of wild rabies in Brazil (2002–2012). Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 64, 624–633 (2017).
Schneider, M. C. et al. Rabies transmitted by vampire bats to humans: An emerging zoonotic disease in Latin America? Pan Am. J. Public Health. 25, 260–269 (2009).
VERA. Vigilancia epidemiológica de la rabia en las Américas. Organ. Panam. la Salud. 34, 14–42 (2020).
World Health Organization. WHO expert consultation on rabies, second report. WHO Tech. Rep. Ser. 982, 1–139 (2013).
Gilbert, A. T. et al. Evidence of rabies virus exposure among humans in the Peruvian Amazon. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 87, 206–215 (2012).
Fahl, W. O. et al. Desmodus rotundus and Artibeus spp. bats might present distinct rabies virus lineages. Brazilian J. Infect. Dis. 16, 545–551 (2012).
Berger, F. et al. Rabies risk: Difficulties encountered during management of grouped cases of bat bites in 2 isolated villages in French Guiana. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 7, e2258 (2013).
Linhart, S. B., Flores Crespo, R. & Mitchell, G. C. Control de murciélagos vampiros por medio de un anticoagulante. Bull Pan Am Health Organ. 73, 100–109 (1972).
Streicker, D. G. et al. Ecological and anthropogenic drivers of rabies exposure in vampire bats: Implications for transmission and control. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 279, 3384–3392 (2012).
Henry, M., Cosson, J. F. & Pons, J. M. Modelling multi-scale spatial variation in species richness from abundance data in a complex neotropical bat assemblage. Ecol. Modell. 221, 2018–2027 (2010).
Bárcenas-Reyes, I. et al. Comportamiento epidemiológico de la rabia paralítica bovina en la región central de México, 2001-2013. Pan Am. J. Public Health. 38, 396–402 (2015).
Benavides, J. A., Valderrama, W. & Streicker, D. G. Spatial expansions and travelling waves of rabies in vampire bats. Proc. R. Soc. B 283, e20160328 (2016).
Van de Vuurst, P. et al. Desmodus rotundus Occurrence Record Database. figshare https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15025296.v6 (2021).
Wieczorek, J. et al. Darwin core: An evolving community-developed biodiversity data standard. PLoS One 7, e29715 (2012).
Robertson, T. et al. The GBIF integrated publishing toolkit: Facilitating the efficient publishing of biodiversity data on the internet. PLoS One 9, e102623 (2014).
Marcial, L. H. & Hemminger, B. M. Scientific data repositories on the web: An initial survey. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 61, 2029–2048 (2010).
GBIF.org. GBIF Occurrence Download. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. GBIF https://doi.org/10.15468/dl.my64ap (2020).
Grattarola, F. et al. Biodiversidata: An open-access biodiversity database for Uruguay. Biodivers. Data J. 7, e36226 (2019).
CRIA. speciesLink Data Download. Centro de Referência em Informação Ambiental. https://specieslink.net/search/download/20210909104533-0016416 (2021).
Cambon, J. Package ‘ tidygeocoder’. CRAN 2–13 (2021).
Wickham, H., Francois, R., Henry, L. & Muller, K. Package ‘ dplyr’: A grammar of data manipulation. CRAN 3–88 (2020).
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statisitical computing. https://www.R-project.org/ (2019).
Zizka, A. et al. Package ‘ CoordinateCleaner’. CRAN 13-152 (2019).
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. (Springer-Verlag, 2016).
ESRI Inc. ArcGIS Desktop Pro, version 2.4.3. https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-pro/overview (2019).
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the institutions and individuals that made their data openly available for this project and that participated in the technical validation process. We thank Daniel G. Streicker for providing critical data of the species’ distribution in Peru; Fernando Sarmiento Parra, Hugo López, Joaquin Guillermo Ramirez Gil, and Abelardo Rodriguez Bolaños who provided data from Colombia; Andrea Najera and Sergio Guillermo Pérez who provided data from Guatemala, and Silene Manrique Rocha who provided data from Brazil. We would also like to acknowledge the efforts of Diego Soler-Tovar and David Treanor in the curation of occurrence data. The publication of this article was supported by the VT Open Access Subvention Fund. L.E.E. was supported by the National Science Foundation HEGS grant # 2116748.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
L.E.E.: conceived and designed the study. P.V.: developed the data curation and designed the manuscript. M.M.D., A.R.S.P., J.L.A., D.G., H.Z., S.V.d.O., E.C.C., J.R.M.B., L.E.E. collected in-country data. P.V., N.B.: collected electronic data. L.E.E., P.V.: conducted the technical validation process. All authors wrote and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Online-only Tables
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ applies to the metadata files associated with this article.
About this article
Cite this article
Van de Vuurst, P., Díaz, M.M., Rodríguez-San Pedro, A. et al. A database of common vampire bat reports. Sci Data 9, 57 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01140-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01140-9
This article is cited by
-
A dataset on African bats’ functional traits
Scientific Data (2023)