The Simrad EK60 echosounder dataset from the Malaspina circumnavigation

We provide the raw acoustic data collected from the R/V Hesperides during the global Malaspina 2010 Spanish Circumnavigation Expedition (14th December 2010, Cádiz-14th July 2011, Cartagena) using a Simrad EK60 scientific echosounder operating at 38 and 120 kHz. The cruise was divided into seven legs: leg 1 (14th December 2010, Cádiz-13th January 2011, Rio de Janeiro), leg 2 (17th January 2011, Rio de Janeiro-6th February 2011, Cape Town), leg 3 (11th February 2011, Cape Town-13th March 2011, Perth), leg 4 (17th March 2011, Perth-30th March 2011, Sydney), leg 5 (16th April 2011, Auckland-8th May 2011, Honolulu), leg 6 (13th May 2011, Honolulu-10th June 2011, Cartagena de Indias) and leg 7 (19th June 2011, Cartagena de Indias-14th July 2011, Cartagena). The echosounder was calibrated at the start of the expedition and calibration parameters were updated in the data acquisition software (ER60) i.e., the logged raw data are calibrated. We also provide a data summary of the acoustic data in the form of post-processed products. Measurement(s) sound speed Technology Type(s) echo sounder Factor Type(s) time • depth • latitude • longitude Sample Characteristic - Organism Metazoa Sample Characteristic - Environment ocean biome • tropical • subtropical • temperate Sample Characteristic - Location global Measurement(s) sound speed Technology Type(s) echo sounder Factor Type(s) time • depth • latitude • longitude Sample Characteristic - Organism Metazoa Sample Characteristic - Environment ocean biome • tropical • subtropical • temperate Sample Characteristic - Location global Machine-accessible metadata file describing the reported data: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.15097260


Background & Summary
In the frame of fisheries assessment, echosounder data are routinely collected around the world 1,2 , and acoustic data are being used increasingly to study several different features of aquatic ecosystems [3][4][5][6] . However, there is still a disconnect between biological oceanography and fisheries research, and often cruises that sample the deep ocean (i.e., the mesopelagic zone from 200 to 1,000 m and beyond) do not collect echosounder data even if the instruments are available onboard.
The 2010 Malaspina circumnavigation expedition aimed at studying the biodiversity and the impact of global change on the deep ocean. The interdisciplinary project collected samples and data across multiple disciplines -from physics and chemistry to genomics and biodiversity 7 -producing a number of new insights about the ocean [8][9][10][11][12][13] . Echosounder data collected during the Malaspina expedition have resulted in numerous publications related to mesopelagic fish biomass and behavior 8,[14][15][16] . However, the data still contain a huge amount of information across a range of spatial (meters to oceans basin) and temporal (seconds to seasonal trends) scales that could be exploited in different ways: the objective of this paper is to provide adequate access to those data. Figure 1 presents the track of the eight-month cruise, and Table 1 provides the detail of the legs and dates. On a routine basis R/V Hesperides sailed at an average speed of 11 knots from around 3 pm to 4 am (local time). The vessel arrived on station at around 4 am daily to carry out sampling operations at a fixed point for about 11 hours.

Methods
Acoustic measurements were carried out continuously using a Simrad EK60 echosounder), operating at 38 and 120 kHz (7° beamwidth transducers) with a ping rate of 0.5 Hz. Unfortunately, the 120 kHz failed during the first leg of the cruise and only 38 kHz data were collected. Echosounder observations were recorded down to

Technical Validation
The echosounder was calibrated before departure (30th of November 2010, close to Mazarron port, water temperature ca. 17 °C) and values of the peak transducer gain (G 0 ) and Simrad correction factor (S a ) for both frequencies were updated in the ER60 software following the standard target method 20 . Briefly, a 38.1 mm diameter tungsten carbide sphere was positioned under the vessel at a range of 12 m using nylon cable, and moved systematically through the acoustic beams of both transducers (38 and 120 kHz). The ER60 software compares measured values   Table 2. Calibration settings and results. Values of peak transducer gain (G 0 ) and the Simrad correction factor (S a ) were applied prior to the expedition.
www.nature.com/scientificdata www.nature.com/scientificdata/  www.nature.com/scientificdata www.nature.com/scientificdata/ of the sphere's target strength at each position in the beam with model predicted values, and estimates the transducers' calibration parameters (G 0 , S a and beam widths) for the given operational settings (see Table 2). Data are stored in raw proprietary Simrad format (.raw,.idx,.bot files).

Usage Notes
The main objective of this paper is to allow researchers full access to the data so they can analyze them with objectives that might be completely different from the ones they were collected for. Therefore, the raw data are provided so that each researcher may analyze them using the appropriate methodologies that will differ from those used in previous studies. However, we recommend paying attention to some of the specificities of the cruise that are important when filtering the data. In particular and depending on the objectives data should be filtered for noise following available techniques [21][22][23] . During the Malaspina expedition, on-station sampling took place from early morning to the beginning of the afternoon, whereas underway navigation occurred from the afternoon and through the night. Therefore, most of the daytime echo sounder data correspond to a stationary situation, and the level of noise is different from day to night (see materials and methods in Irigoien et al., 2014). The data were subjected to different types of noise along the survey. The most common noise was caused by the propeller and/or wave-hull collisions occurring at vessel speeds over 11 knots and were seen as long spikes on the echogram (example in Figs. 2 and 3, see also supplementary figure 7 in Irigoien et al. 8 for filtering results). It is recommended to treat these data, especially for depths deeper than 100-200 m, using appropriate filters 24 . On some occasions, data collected near the coast, in shallow waters, presented interference from other acoustic equipment onboard. This was seen as typical short "flecks" present in pings separated by constant intervals, gradually increasing its range of appearance on the echogram. This type of noise can also be removed by means of impulsive noise filters 24 . Some parts of the data were also affected by bad weather conditions, this typically seen on the echogram as backscattering losses in some consecutive pings. This can also be treated with well-established filters as the attenuated signal removal. Another issue to be highlighted is that, due to technical problems in some small parts of the tracks, the 38 kHz frequency was in passive mode. Our previous work being focused in the mesopelagic, the 120 kHz data were not used. A preliminary analysis of the 120 kHz data showed to have a high noise to signal ratio. We have included them here as it is not possible to evaluate if useful for specific objectives or using different filtering approaches, however caution is recommended if using the 120 kHz data. Finally, 120 kHz data were not recorded during the first leg due to malfunctions of the transponder.