Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Protocol
  • Published:

Off-the-shelf proximity biotinylation using ProtA-TurboID

Abstract

Proximity biotinylation is a commonly used method to identify the in vivo proximal proteome for proteins of interest. This technology typically relies on fusing a bait protein to a biotin ligase using overexpression or clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based tagging, thus prohibiting the use of such assays in cell types that are difficult to transfect or transduce. We recently developed an ‘off-the-shelf’ proximity biotinylation method that makes use of a recombinant enzyme consisting of the biotin ligase TurboID fused to the antibody-recognizing moiety Protein A. In this method, a bait-specific antibody and the ProteinA-Turbo enzyme are consecutively added to permeabilized fixed or unfixed cells. Following incubation, during which ProteinA-Turbo antibody–antigen complexes are formed, unbound molecules are washed away, after which bait-proximal biotinylation is triggered by the addition of exogenous biotin. Finally, biotinylated proteins are enriched from crude lysates using streptavidin beads followed by mass spectrometry-based protein identification. In principle, any scientist can perform this protocol within 3 days, although generating the proteomics data requires access to a high-end liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry setup. Data analysis and data visualization are relatively straightforward and can be performed using any type of software that converts raw mass spectrometry spectra files into identified and quantified proteins. The protocol has been optimized for nuclear targets but may also be adapted to other subcellular regions of interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Schematic workflow of the off-the-shelf proximity labeling strategy.
Fig. 2: Benchmark steps for off-the-shelf proximity labeling using ProtA-TurboID.
Fig. 3: Off-the-shelf proximity labeling using ProtA-TurboID application for centromere enrichment using the unfixed cells without nuclear isolation workflow.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The MS proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE27 partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD030963, and processed data are provided in Supplementary Table 1. Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Richards, A. L., Eckhardt, M. & Krogan, N. J. Mass spectrometry‐based protein–protein interaction networks for the study of human diseases. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, 1–18 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Smits, A. H. & Vermeulen, M. Characterizing protein–protein interactions using mass spectrometry: challenges and opportunities. Trends Biotechnol. 34, 825–834 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Roux, K. J., Kim, D. I., Raida, M. & Burke, B. A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 196, 801–810 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Samavarchi-Tehrani, P., Samson, R. & Gingras, A.-C. Proximity dependent biotinylation: key enzymes and adaptation to proteomics approaches. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 19, 757–773 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao, X. et al. ultraID: a compact and efficient enzyme for proximity-dependent biotinylation in living cells. bioRxiv 2021.06.16.448656 (2021).

  6. Kido, K. et al. AirID, a novel proximity biotinylation enzyme, for analysis of protein–protein interactions. Elife 9, 1–24 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Branon, T. C. et al. Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4201 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Go, C. D. et al. A proximity-dependent biotinylation map of a human cell. Nature 595, 120–124 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rhee, H.-W. et al. Proteomic mapping of mitochondria in living cells via spatially restricted enzymatic tagging. Science 339, 1328–1331 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Han, S., Li, J. & Ting, A. Y. Proximity labeling: spatially resolved proteomic mapping for neurobiology. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 50, 17–23 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moquin, D. M. et al. Localized protein biotinylation at dna damage sites identifies zpet, a repressor of homologous recombination. Genes Dev. 33, 253 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. van Mierlo, G. & Vermeulen, M. Chromatin proteomics to study epigenetics – challenges and opportunities. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 20, 100056 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Santos-Barriopedro, I., van Mierlo, G. & Vermeulen, M. Off-the-shelf proximity biotinylation for interaction proteomics. Nat. Commun. 12, 5015 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bar, D. Z. et al. Biotinylation by antibody recognition - a method for proximity labeling. Nat. Methods 15, 127–133 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, X. et al. Defining proximity proteomics of histone modified proteins by antibody-mediated protein A-APEX2 labeling. Genom. Proteom. Bioinform. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2021.09.003 (2022).

  16. Rappsilber, J., Mann, M. & Ishihama, Y. Protocol for micro-purification, enrichment, pre-fractionation and storage of peptides for proteomics using StageTips. Nat. Protoc. 2, 1896–1906 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. St-Germain, J. R. et al. Variability in streptavidin-sepharose matrix quality can significantly affect proximity-dependent biotinylation (BioID) data. J. Proteome Res. 19, 3554–3561 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Villaseñor, R. et al. ChromID identifies the protein interactome at chromatin marks. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 728–736 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, X. et al. Proteome-wide identification of ubiquitin interactions using UbIA-MS. Nat. Protoc. 13, 530–550 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jeyaprakash, A. A. et al. Structure of a survivin-borealin-INCENP core complex reveals how chromosomal passengers travel together. Cell 131, 271–285 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Przewloka, M. R. et al. CENP-C is a structural platform for kinetochore assembly. Curr. Biol. 21, 399–405 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Petrovic, A. et al. Structure of the MIS12 complex and molecular basis of its interaction with CENP-C at human kinetochores. Cell 167, 1028–1040 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hayashi, T. et al. Mis16 and Mis18 are required for CENP-A loading and histone deacetylation at centromeres. Cell 118, 715–729 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McAinsh, A. D. & Meraldi, P. The CCAN complex: linking centromere specification to control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 22, 946–952 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hadders, M. A. & Lens, S. M. A. Changing places: chromosomal passenger complex relocation in early anaphase. Trends Cell Biol. 32, 165–176 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Saksouk, N. et al. Redundant mechanisms to form silent chromatin at pericentromeric regions rely on BEND3 and DNA methylation. Mol. Cell 56, 580–594 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Perez-Riverol, Y. et al. The PRIDE database and related tools and resources in 2019: improving support for quantification data. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D442–D450 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank members of the Vermeulen lab for input during the development of the off-the-shelf proximity labeling approach. The Vermeulen lab is part of the Oncode Institute, which is partly funded by the Dutch Cancer Society. This work is further supported by an ERC consolidator grant to M.V. (771059). I.S.B. is supported by a Marie Sklodowska-Curie postdoctoral fellowship under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant no. 835908). G.v.M. is supported by an EMBO long-term fellowship (no. 895-2020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

I.S.B. and G.v.M. contributed equally to this work. I.S.B. and G.v.M. performed experiments and data analyses. I.S.B., G.v.M. and M.V. wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Guido van Mierlo or Michiel Vermeulen.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

I.S.B., G.v.M. and M.V. have filed a patent related to this work (PCT/NL2022/050197).

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Protocols thanks Dalia Barsyte-Lovejoy and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key reference using this protocol

Santos-Barriopedro, I. et al. Nat. Commun. 12, 5015 (2021): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25338-4

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Processed data related to MS measurements described in Figs. 2 and 3

Source data

Source Data Fig. 1

Unprocessed western blots

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Santos-Barriopedro, I., van Mierlo, G. & Vermeulen, M. Off-the-shelf proximity biotinylation using ProtA-TurboID. Nat Protoc 18, 36–57 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-022-00748-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-022-00748-w

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing: Translational Research

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Translational Research newsletter — top stories in biotechnology, drug discovery and pharma.

Get what matters in translational research, free to your inbox weekly. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Translational Research