Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Engineering brain assembloids to interrogate human neural circuits


The development of neural circuits involves wiring of neurons locally following their generation and migration, as well as establishing long-distance connections between brain regions. Studying these developmental processes in the human nervous system remains difficult because of limited access to tissue that can be maintained as functional over time in vitro. We have previously developed a method to convert human pluripotent stem cells into brain region–specific organoids that can be fused and integrated to form assembloids and study neuronal migration. In contrast to approaches that mix cell lineages in 2D cultures or engineer microchips, assembloids leverage self-organization to enable complex cell–cell interactions, circuit formation and maturation in long-term cultures. In this protocol, we describe approaches to model long-range neuronal connectivity in human brain assembloids. We present how to generate 3D spheroids resembling specific domains of the nervous system and then how to integrate them physically to allow axonal projections and synaptic assembly. In addition, we describe a series of assays including viral labeling and retrograde tracing, 3D live imaging of axon projection and optogenetics combined with calcium imaging and electrophysiological recordings to probe and manipulate the circuits in assembloids. The assays take 3–4 months to complete and require expertise in stem cell culture, imaging and electrophysiology. We anticipate that these approaches will be useful in deciphering human-specific aspects of neural circuit assembly and in modeling neurodevelopmental disorders with patient-derived cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Fig. 1: Overview of generation and functional assays in brain assembloids.
Fig. 2: Generation of region-specific brain organoids and assembloids.
Fig. 3: Neural circuit formation in cortico-striatal assembloids.
Fig. 4: Optogenetics and calcium imaging in cortico-striatal assembloids.
Fig. 5: Electrophysiological recordings in assembloids.

Data availability

The data presented in this protocol are available on request from the corresponding author. Source data are provided with this paper.


  1. Winnubst, J. et al. Reconstruction of 1,000 projection neurons reveals new cell types and organization of long-range connectivity in the mouse brain. Cell 179, 268–281.e13 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kostovic, I., Rados, M., Kostovic-Srzentic, M. & Krsnik, Z. Fundamentals of the development of connectivity in the human fetal brain in late gestation: from 24 weeks gestational age to term. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 80, 393–414 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaiser, T. & Feng, G. Modeling psychiatric disorders for developing effective treatments. Nat. Med. 21, 979–988 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Pasca, S. P. The rise of three-dimensional human brain cultures. Nature 553, 437–445 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Velasco, S., Paulsen, B. & Arlotta, P. 3D brain organoids: studying brain development and disease outside the embryo. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 43, 375–389 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Birey, F. et al. Assembly of functionally integrated human forebrain spheroids. Nature 545, 54–59 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bagley, J. A., Reumann, D., Bian, S., Levi-Strauss, J. & Knoblich, J. A. Fused cerebral organoids model interactions between brain regions. Nat. Methods 14, 743–751 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiang, Y. et al. Fusion of regionally specified hPSC-derived organoids models human brain development and interneuron migration. Cell Stem Cell 21, 383–398.e7 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sloan, S. A., Andersen, J., Pasca, A. M., Birey, F. & Pasca, S. P. Generation and assembly of human brain region-specific three-dimensional cultures. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2062–2085 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoon, S.-J. et al. Reliability of human cortical organoid generation. Nat. Methods 16, 75–78 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Miura, Y. et al. Generation of human striatal organoids and cortico-striatal assembloids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1421–1430 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shepherd, G. M. Corticostriatal connectivity and its role in disease. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 278–291 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Welch, J. M. et al. Cortico-striatal synaptic defects and OCD-like behaviours in Sapap3-mutant mice. Nature 448, 894–900 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Peca, J. et al. Shank3 mutant mice display autistic-like behaviours and striatal dysfunction. Nature 472, 437–442 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Milad, M. R. & Rauch, S. L. Obsessive-compulsive disorder: beyond segregated cortico-striatal pathways. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16, 43–51 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharma, A., Sances, S., Workman, M. J. & Svendsen, C. N. Multi-lineage human iPSC-derived platforms for disease modeling and drug discovery. Cell Stem Cell 26, 309–329 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiang, Y. et al. hESC-derived thalamic organoids form reciprocal projections when fused with cortical organoids. Cell Stem Cell 24, 487–497.e7 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Andersen, J. et al. Generation of functional human 3D cortico-motor assembloids. Cell 183, 1913–1929.e26 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cakir, B. et al. Engineering of human brain organoids with a functional vascular-like system. Nat. Methods 16, 1169–1175 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Marton, R. M. et al. Differentiation and maturation of oligodendrocytes in human three-dimensional neural cultures. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 484–491 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Strano, A., Tuck, E., Stubbs, V. E. & Livesey, F. J. Variable outcomes in neural differentiation of human PSCs arise from intrinsic differences in developmental signaling pathways. Cell Rep. 31, 107732 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Micali, N. et al. Variation of human neural stem cells generating organizer states in vitro before committing to cortical excitatory or inhibitory neuronal fates. Cell Rep. 31, 107599 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Button, K. S. et al. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 14, 365–376 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Pasca, S. P. et al. Using iPSC-derived neurons to uncover cellular phenotypes associated with Timothy syndrome. Nat. Med. 17, 1657–1662 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tian, Y. et al. Alteration in basal and depolarization induced transcriptional network in iPSC derived neurons from Timothy syndrome. Genome Med. 6, 75 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sun, Y. et al. A deleterious Nav1.1 mutation selectively impairs telencephalic inhibitory neurons derived from Dravet Syndrome patients. eLife 5, e13073 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Susaki, E. A. et al. Whole-brain imaging with single-cell resolution using chemical cocktails and computational analysis. Cell 157, 726–739 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tainaka, K. et al. Chemical landscape for tissue clearing based on hydrophilic reagents. Cell Rep. 24, 2196–2210.e9 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Klapoetke, N. C. et al. Independent optical excitation of distinct neural populations. Nat. Methods 11, 338–346 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. de Leeuw, C. N. et al. rAAV-compatible MiniPromoters for restricted expression in the brain and eye. Mol. Brain 9, 52 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chetty, S. et al. A simple tool to improve pluripotent stem cell differentiation. Nat. Methods 10, 553–556 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ishikawa, D. et al. Fluorescent pipettes for optically targeted patch-clamp recordings. Neural Netw. 23, 669–672 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank members of the Pașca laboratory at Stanford University for experimental support, as well as the Stanford WuTsai Neurosciences Institute Virus Core for production of AAVs. This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) BRAINS Award (MH107800) (to S.P.P.), Stanford Bio-X, the NYSCF Robertson Stem Cell Investigator Award (to S.P.P.), the Stanford Wu Tsai Neurosciences Big Idea Project on Human Brain Organogenesis (to S.P.P.), the Kwan Research Fund (to S.P.P.), the Coates Foundation (to S.P.P.), the Senkut Research Fund (to S.P.P.), the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Ben Barres Investigator Award (to S.P.P.), the Stanford Medicine Dean’s Postdoctoral Fellowship (to Y.M.) and the Stanford Maternal & Child Health Research Institute (MCHRI) Postdoctoral Fellowship (to Y.M. and O.R.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



Y.M. collected data and optimized the protocols for generating hStrSs and assembloids, clearing of assembloids, retrograde viral tracing and optogenetics coupled with calcium imaging. M.-Y.L collected data and optimized the protocols for whole-cell recordings. O.R. optimized the protocols and analyzed optogenetics experiments combined with calcium imaging. S.-J.Y. optimized the protocols for generation of hCSs. G.N. collected data and optimized the protocols for clearing of assembloids. Y.M. and S.P.P. wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. S.P.P. supervised this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergiu P. Pașca.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Stanford University has filed and holds patents for the generation of brain region–specific spheroids/organoids and assembloids. Y.M. and S.P.P. are listed as inventors on some of these patents.

Additional information

Peer review information Nature Protocols thanks J. Gray Camp, Madeline A Lancaster and Alysson R. Muotri for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Related links

Key references using this protocol

Miura, Y. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 1421–1430 (2020):

Yoon, S.-J. et al. Nat. Methods 16, 75–78 (2019):

Sloan, S. A. et al. Nat. Protoc. 13, 2062–2085 (2018):

Source data

Source Data Fig. 4

Statistical source data

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Miura, Y., Li, MY., Revah, O. et al. Engineering brain assembloids to interrogate human neural circuits. Nat Protoc 17, 15–35 (2022).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

This article is cited by


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing