Most catalytic, structural and regulatory functions of the cell are carried out by functional modules, typically complexes containing or consisting of proteins. The composition and abundance of these complexes and the quantitative distribution of specific proteins across different modules are therefore of major significance in basic and translational biology. However, detection and quantification of protein complexes on a proteome-wide scale is technically challenging. We have recently extended the targeted proteomics rationale to the level of native protein complex analysis (complex-centric proteome profiling). The complex-centric workflow described herein consists of size exclusion chromatography (SEC) to fractionate native protein complexes, data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry to precisely quantify the proteins in each SEC fraction based on a set of proteotypic peptides and targeted, complex-centric analysis where prior information from generic protein interaction maps is used to detect and quantify protein complexes with high selectivity and statistical error control via the computational framework CCprofiler (https://github.com/CCprofiler/CCprofiler). Complex-centric proteome profiling captures most proteins in complex-assembled state and reveals their organization into hundreds of complexes and complex variants observable in a given cellular state. The protocol is applicable to cultured cells and can potentially also be adapted to primary tissue and does not require any genetic engineering of the respective sample sources. At present, it requires ~8 d of wet-laboratory work, 15 d of mass spectrometry measurement time and 7 d of computational analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
A detailed protocol on how to perform peptide-centric SEC-SWATH-MS data analysis is available on GitHub at https://github.com/CCprofiler/SECSWATH_PeptideCentricAnalysis. A detailed protocol on how to perform complex-centric SEC-SWATH-MS data analysis with the CCprofiler package as well as example data of our HEK293 experiment are available on GitHub at https://github.com/CCprofiler/SECSWATH_ComplexCentricAnalysis and in the Supplementary CCprofiler manual.
Bludau, I. & Aebersold, R. Proteomic and interactomic insights into the molecular basis of cell functional diversity. Nat. Rev. Mol. Biol. 21, 327–340 (2020).
Huttlin, E. L. et al. The BioPlex network: a systematic exploration of the human interactome. Cell 162, 425–440 (2015).
Huttlin, E. L. et al. Architecture of the human interactome defines protein communities and disease networks. Nature 545, 505 (2017).
Hein, M. Y. et al. A human interactome in three quantitative dimensions organized by stoichiometries and abundances. Cell 163, 712–723 (2015).
Roux, K. J., Kim, D. I., Raida, M. & Burke, B. A promiscuous biotin ligase fusion protein identifies proximal and interacting proteins in mammalian cells. J. Cell Biol. 196, 801–810 (2012).
Liu, X., Yang, W., Gao, Q. & Regnier, F. Toward chromatographic analysis of interacting protein networks. J. Chromatogr. A 1178, 24–32 (2008).
Dong, M. et al. A “tagless” strategy for identification of stable protein complexes genome-wide by multidimensional orthogonal chromatographic separation and iTRAQ reagent tracking. J. Proteome Res. 7, 1836–1849 (2008).
Kristensen, A. R., Gsponer, J. & Foster, L. J. A high-throughput approach for measuring temporal changes in the interactome. Nat. Methods 9, 907 (2012).
Kristensen, A. R. & Foster, L. J. Protein correlation profiling-SILAC to study protein-protein interactions. in Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids in Cell Culture (SILAC). Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols) Vol. 1188 (ed. Warscheid, B.) 263–270 (Humana Press, 2014).
Havugimana, P. C. et al. A census of human soluble protein complexes. Cell 150, 1068–1081 (2012).
Wan, C. et al. Panorama of ancient metazoan macromolecular complexes. Nature 525, 339–344 (2015).
Kirkwood, K. J., Ahmad, Y., Larance, M. & Lamond, A. I. Characterization of native protein complexes and protein isoform variation using size-fractionation-based quantitative proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 12, 3851–3873 (2013).
Larance, M. et al. Global membrane protein interactome analysis using in vivo crosslinking and mass spectrometry-based protein correlation profiling. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 15, 2476–2490 (2016).
Scott, N. E. et al. Interactome disassembly during apoptosis occurs independent of caspase cleavage. Mol. Syst. Biol. 13, 906 (2017).
Stacey, R. G., Skinnider, M. A., Scott, N. E. & Foster, L. J. A rapid and accurate approach for prediction of interactomes from co-elution data (PrInCE). BMC Bioinformatics 18, 457 (2017).
Heusel, M. et al. Complex-centric proteome profiling by SEC-SWATH-MS. Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, e8438 (2019).
Scott, N. E., Brown, L. M., Kristensen, A. R. & Foster, L. J. Development of a computational framework for the analysis of protein correlation profiling and spatial proteomics experiments. J. Proteomics 118, 112–129 (2015).
Heusel, M. et al. A global screen for assembly state changes of the mitotic proteome by SEC-SWATH-MS. Cell Syst 10, 133–155.e6 (2020).
Pauling, L., Itano, H. A., Singer, S. J. & Wells, I. C. Sickle cell anemia, a molecular disease. Science 110, 543–548 (1949).
Bache, N. et al. A novel LC system embeds analytes in pre-formed gradients for rapid, ultra-robust proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 17, 2284–2296 (2018).
Wessels, H. J. C. T. et al. LC-MS/MS as an alternative for SDS-PAGE in blue native analysis of protein complexes. Proteomics 9, 4221–4228 (2009).
Ong, S. E. et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 1, 376–386 (2002).
Hu, L. Z. et al. EPIC: software toolkit for elution profile-based inference of protein complexes. Nat. Methods 16, 737–742 (2019).
Glatter, T., Wepf, A., Aebersold, R. & Gstaiger, M. An integrated workflow for charting the human interaction proteome: insights into the PP2A system. Mol. Syst. Biol. 5, 237 (2009).
Roncagalli, R. et al. Quantitative proteomics analysis of signalosome dynamics in primary T cells identifies the surface receptor CD6 as a Lat adaptor–independent TCR signaling hub. Nat. Immunol. 15, 384–392 (2014).
Collins, B. C. et al. Quantifying protein interaction dynamics by SWATH mass spectrometry: application to the 14-3-3 system. Nat. Methods 10, 1246–1253 (2013).
Lange, V., Picotti, P., Domon, B. & Aebersold, R. Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 222 (2008).
Picotti, P. & Aebersold, R. Selected reaction monitoring–based proteomics: workflows, potential, pitfalls and future directions. Nat. Methods 9, 555–566 (2012).
Schubert, O. T. et al. Building high-quality assay libraries for targeted analysis of SWATH MS data. Nat. Protoc. 10, 426–441 (2015).
Collins, B. C. et al. Multi-laboratory assessment of reproducibility, qualitative and quantitative performance of SWATH-mass spectrometry. Nat. Commun. 8, 291 (2017).
Bruderer, R. et al. Optimization of experimental parameters in data-independent mass spectrometry significantly increases depth and reproducibility of results. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 16, 2296–2309 (2017).
Kelstrup, C. D. et al. Performance evaluation of the Q exactive HF-X for shotgun proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 17, 727–738 (2018).
Meier, F. et al. Parallel accumulation—serial fragmentation combined with data-independent acquisition (diaPASEF): bottom-up proteomics with near optimal ion usage. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/656207v2 (2019).
Rosenberger, G. et al. A repository of assays to quantify 10,000 human proteins by SWATH-MS. Sci. Data 1, 140031 (2014).
Picotti, P. et al. A complete mass-spectrometric map of the yeast proteome applied to quantitative trait analysis. Nature 494, 266–270 (2013).
Blattmann, P. et al. Generation of a zebrafish SWATH-MS spectral library to quantify 10,000 proteins. Sci. Data 6, 190011 (2019).
Heusel, M. Complex-Centric Proteome Profiling by SEC-SWATH Mass Spectrometry. Dissertation, ETH Zurich (2017). https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/220300
Gillet, L. C. et al. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, O111.016717 (2012).
Röst, H. L. et al. OpenSWATH enables automated, targeted analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 219 (2014).
Reiter, L. et al. mProphet: automated data processing and statistical validation for large-scale SRM experiments. Nat. Methods 8, 430–435 (2011).
Teleman, J. et al. DIANA—algorithmic improvements for analysis of data-independent acquisition MS data. Bioinformatics 31, 555–562 (2015).
Rosenberger, G. et al. Statistical control of peptide and protein error rates in large-scale targeted data-independent acquisition analyses. Nat. Methods 14, 921–927 (2017).
Röst, H. L. et al. TRIC: an automated alignment strategy for reproducible protein quantification in targeted proteomics. Nat. Methods 13, 777 (2016).
Ruepp, A. et al. CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes–2009. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D497–D501 (2009).
Franceschini, A. et al. STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D808–D815 (2012).
Szklarczyk, D. et al. STRING v10: protein–protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D447–D452 (2015).
Rolland, T. et al. A proteome-scale map of the human interactome network. Cell 159, 1212–1226 (2014).
Choi, S. G., Richardson, A., Lambourne, L., Hill, D. E. & Vidal, M. Protein interactomics by two-hybrid methods. Methods Mol. Biol. 1794, 1–14 (2018).
Gavin, A.-C. et al. Proteome survey reveals modularity of the yeast cell machinery. Nature 440, 631–636 (2006).
Krogan, N. J. et al. Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 440, 637–643 (2006).
Guruharsha, K. G. et al. A protein complex network of Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 147, 690–703 (2011).
Storey, J. D. & Tibshirani, R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 9440–9445 (2003).
Burger, T. Gentle introduction to the statistical foundations of false discovery rate in quantitative proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 17, 12–22 (2018).
Breheny, P., Stromberg, A. & Lambert, J. p-value histograms: inference and diagnostics. High Throughput 7, E23 (2018).
Adusumilli, R. & Mallick, P. Data conversion with ProteoWizard msConvert. in Proteomics. Methods in Molecular Biology Vol. 1550 (eds. Comai, L., Katz, J. & Mallick, P.) 339–368 (Humana Press, 2017).
Giurgiu, M. et al. CORUM: the comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes-2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D559–D563 (2019).
Hirano, Y. et al. A heterodimeric complex that promotes the assembly of mammalian 20S proteasomes. Nature 437, 1381–1385 (2005).
Hirano, Y. et al. Dissecting β-ring assembly pathway of the mammalian 20S proteasome. EMBO J. 27, 2204–2213 (2008).
The project was supported by the SystemsX.ch projects PhosphoNetX PPM and project TbX (to R.A.) and the European Research Council (ERC-20140AdG 670821 to R.A.). M.H. was supported by a grant from Institut Mérieux. I.B. was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant no. 31003A_166435). B.C.C. was supported by a Swiss National Science Foundation Ambizione grant (PZ00P3_161435). A.B.-E. was supported by the National Institutes of Health project Omics4TB Disease Progression (U19 AI106761).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Protocols thanks Bruno Manadas, Leonard Foster and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Key references using this protocol
Heusel, M. et al. Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, e8438 (2019): https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20188438
Heusel, M. et al. Cell Syst. 10, 133–155.e6 (2020): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2020.01.001
Key data used in this protocol
Heusel, M. et al. Mol. Syst. Biol. 15, e8438 (2019): https://doi.org/10.15252/msb.20188438
Extended Data Fig. 1 Overlap of proteins and protein complexes across the SEC fractionation dimension.
a, Heat-map representation of the percentage of detected proteins that are shared between each pair of SEC fractions (top). The percentage overlap is calculated as the number of shared proteins relative to the total set of proteins detected in any pair of SEC fractions, as a percentage. The bottom panel illustrates the average percentage of overlapping proteins at different distance thresholds between SEC fractions. b, Heat-map representation of the percentage of detected protein complexes that are shared between each pair of SEC fractions (top). The percentage overlap is calculated as the number of shared protein complexes relative to the total set of protein complexes detected in any pair of SEC fractions, as a percentage. The bottom panel illustrates the average percentage of overlapping protein complexes at different distance thresholds between SEC fractions.
About this article
Cite this article
Bludau, I., Heusel, M., Frank, M. et al. Complex-centric proteome profiling by SEC-SWATH-MS for the parallel detection of hundreds of protein complexes. Nat Protoc 15, 2341–2386 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-020-0332-6
Meta-analysis defines principles for the design and analysis of co-fractionation mass spectrometry experiments
Nature Methods (2021)
PCprophet: a framework for protein complex prediction and differential analysis using proteomic data
Nature Methods (2021)
Nature Communications (2021)
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2021)