Cultivating native bacteria from roots of plants grown in a given environment is essential for dissecting the functions of the root microbiota for plant growth and health with strain-specific resolution. In this study, we established a straightforward protocol for high-throughput bacterial isolation from fresh root samples using limiting dilution to ensure that most cultured bacteria originated from only one microorganism. This is followed by strain characterization using a two-sided barcode polymerase chain reaction system to identify pure and heterogeneous bacterial cultures. Our approach overcomes multiple difficulties of traditional bacterial isolation and identification methods, such as obtaining bacteria with diverse growth rates while greatly increasing throughput. To facilitate data processing, we developed an easy-to-use bioinformatic pipeline called ‘Culturome’ (https://github.com/YongxinLiu/Culturome) and a graphical user interface web server (http://bailab.genetics.ac.cn/culturome/). This protocol allows any research group (two or three lab members without expertise in bioinformatics) to systematically cultivate root-associated bacteria within 8–9 weeks.
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $8.25 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Rent or Buy article
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
The raw sequence data used in this paper have been deposited in the Genome Sequence Archive57 in the BIG Data Center58 under accession number CRA002517. The authors declare that all data supporting the findings of this study are available in the original paper12. Because many labs might not frequently perform systematic bacterial isolation, to reduce the experimental cost we are happy to share the full set of barcoded primers with any scientists who want to use this protocol. Correspondence and requests for materials and computational scripts should be addressed to Y.B.
The computational scripts of the data analysis pipeline (Culturome v1.0) are freely available at GitHub (https://github.com/YongxinLiu/Culturome) under a GNU General Public License v2 or later. The Culturome web server is freely available at http://bailab.genetics.ac.cn/culturome and continuously maintained by the authors.
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J. & Bakker, P. A. H. M. The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends Plant Sci. 17, 478–486 (2012).
Bulgarelli, D. et al. Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature 488, 91–95 (2012).
Lundberg, D. S. et al. Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488, 86 (2012).
Peiffer, J. A. et al. Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6548–6553 (2013).
Edwards, J. et al. Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E911–E920 (2015).
Wang, W. et al. An Arabidopsis secondary metabolite directly targets expression of the bacterial type III secretion system to inhibit bacterial virulence. Cell Host Microbe 27, 601–613 (2020).
Durán, P. et al. Microbial interkingdom interactions in roots promote Arabidopsis survival. Cell 175, 973–983 (2018).
Carrión, V. J. et al. Pathogen-induced activation of disease-suppressive functions in the endophytic root microbiome. Science 366, 606–612 (2019).
Bai, Y. et al. Functional overlap of the Arabidopsis leaf and root microbiota. Nature 528, 364–369 (2015).
Lebeis, S. L. et al. Salicylic acid modulates colonization of the root microbiome by specific bacterial taxa. Science 349, 860–864 (2015).
Zhang, J. et al. Root microbiota shift in rice correlates with resident time in the field and developmental stage. Sci. China Life Sci. 61, 613–621 (2018).
Zhang, J. et al. NRT1.1B is associated with root microbiota composition and nitrogen use in field-grown rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 676–684 (2019).
Castrillo, G. et al. Root microbiota drive direct integration of phosphate stress and immunity. Nature 543, 513–518 (2017).
Huang, A. C. et al. A specialized metabolic network selectively modulates Arabidopsis root microbiota. Science 364, eaau6389 (2019).
Yuan, J. et al. Root exudates drive the soil-borne legacy of aboveground pathogen infection. Microbiome 6, 156 (2018).
Lu, T. et al. Rhizosphere microorganisms can influence the timing of plant flowering. Microbiome 6, 231 (2018).
Kwak, M.-J. et al. Rhizosphere microbiome structure alters to enable wilt resistance in tomato. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 1100 (2018).
Garrido-Oter, R. et al. Modular traits of the Rhizobiales root microbiota and their evolutionary relationship with symbiotic Rhizobia. Cell Host Microbe 24, 155–167 (2018).
Liu, Y.-X., Qin, Y. & Bai, Y. Reductionist synthetic community approaches in root microbiome research. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 49, 97–102 (2019).
Lagier, J.-C. et al. Culturing the human microbiota and culturomics. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 540–550 (2018).
Pham, V. H. T. & Kim, J. Cultivation of unculturable soil bacteria. Trends Biotechnol. 30, 475–484 (2012).
Overmann, J., Abt, B. & Sikorski, J. Present and future of culturing bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 71, 711–730 (2017).
Goodman, A. L. et al. Extensive personal human gut microbiota culture collections characterized and manipulated in gnotobiotic mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 6252–6257 (2011).
Lagier, J.-C. et al. Culture of previously uncultured members of the human gut microbiota by culturomics. Nat. Microbiol 1, 16203 (2016).
Forster, S. C. et al. A human gut bacterial genome and culture collection for improved metagenomic analyses. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 186–192 (2019).
Zou, Y. et al. 1,520 reference genomes from cultivated human gut bacteria enable functional microbiome analyses. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 179–185 (2019).
Ji, P., Zhang, Y., Wang, J. & Zhao, F. MetaSort untangles metagenome assembly by reducing microbial community complexity. Nat. Commun. 8, 14306 (2017).
Wang, Y., Hammes, F., Boon, N., Chami, M. & Egli, T. Isolation and characterization of low nucleic acid (LNA)-content bacteria. ISME J. 3, 889–902 (2009).
Nichols, D. et al. Use of Ichip for high-throughput in situ cultivation of “uncultivable” microbial species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 2445–2450 (2010).
Aoi, Y. et al. Hollow-fiber membrane chamber as a device for in situ environmental cultivation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 3826–3833 (2009).
Zhang, F. et al. Microbiota transplantation: concept, methodology and strategy for its modernization. Protein Cell 9, 462–473 (2018).
Karasov, T. L. et al. Arabidopsis thaliana and Pseudomonas pathogens exhibit stable associations over evolutionary timescales. Cell Host Microbe 24, 168–179 (2018).
Oberhardt, M. A. et al. Harnessing the landscape of microbial culture media to predict new organism–media pairings. Nat. Commun. 6, 8493 (2015).
Atlas, R. M. Handbook of Microbiological Media (CRC Press, 2010).
Vartoukian, S. R., Palmer, R. M. & Wade, W. G. Strategies for culture of ‘unculturable’ bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 309, 1–7 (2010).
Davis, K. E. R., Joseph, S. J. & Janssen, P. H. Effects of growth medium, inoculum size, and incubation time on culturability and isolation of soil bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 826–834 (2005).
Joseph, S. J., Hugenholtz, P., Sangwan, P., Osborne, C. A. & Janssen, P. H. Isolation and identification of Actinobacteria from surface-sterilized wheat roots. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 7210–7215 (2003).
Hacquard, S. et al. Microbiota and host nutrition across plant and animal kingdoms. Cell Host Microbe 17, 603–616 (2015).
Reasoner, D. J. & Geldreich, E. E. A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 49, 1–7 (1985).
Coombs, J. T. & Franco, C. M. M. Isolation and identification of Actinobacteria from surface-sterilized wheat roots. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 5603–5608 (2003).
Travers, R. S., Martin, P. A. W. & Reichelderfer, C. F. Selective process for efficient isolation of soil Bacillus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 53, 1263–1266 (1987).
Chelius, M. K. & Triplett, E. W. The diversity of archaea and bacteria in association with the roots of Zea mays L. Microb. Ecol. 41, 252–263 (2001).
Costea, P. I. et al. Towards standards for human fecal sample processing in metagenomic studies. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1069–1076 (2017).
Knight, R. et al. Best practices for analysing microbiomes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 16, 410–422 (2018).
Chong, J., Liu, P., Zhou, G. & Xia, J. Using MicrobiomeAnalyst for comprehensive statistical, functional, and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nat. Protoc. 15, 799–821 (2020).
Liu, Y.-X. et al. A practical guide to amplicon and metagenomic analysis of microbiome data. Protein Cell https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-020-00724-8 (2020).
Liu, Y.-X., Qin, Y., Guo, X. & Bai, Y. [Methods and applications for microbiome data analysis]. Yi Chuan 41, 845–862 (2019).
Qian, X.-B. et al. A guide to human microbiome research: study design, sample collection, and bioinformatics analysis. Chin. Med. J. 133, 1844–1855 (2020).
Caporaso, J. G. et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7, 335–336 (2010).
Bolyen, E. et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857 (2019).
Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010).
Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C. & Mahé, F. VSEARCH: a versatile open source tool for metagenomics. PeerJ 4, e2584 (2016).
Chen, Q. et al. Recently duplicated sesterterpene (C25) gene clusters in Arabidopsis thaliana modulate root microbiota. Sci. China Life Sci. 62, 947–958 (2019).
Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (Springer, 2016).
Kolde, R. pheatmap: Pretty Heatmaps (2015).
Asnicar, F., Weingart, G., Tickle, T. L., Huttenhower, C. & Segata, N. Compact graphical representation of phylogenetic data and metadata with GraPhlAn. PeerJ 3, e1029 (2015).
Wang, Y. et al. GSA: Genome Sequence Archive. Genomics Proteom. Bioinforma. 15, 14–18 (2017).
Partners, N. G. D. C. M. Database resources of the National Genomics Data Center in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D24–D33 (2020).
Cole, J. R. et al. Ribosomal Database Project: data and tools for high throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D633–D642 (2014).
Grüning, B. et al. Bioconda: sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences. Nat. Methods 15, 475–476 (2018).
Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D9–D16 (2020).
Cook, C. E., Stroe, O., Cochrane, G., Birney, E. & Apweiler, R. The European Bioinformatics Institute in 2020: building a global infrastructure of interconnected data resources for the life sciences. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, D17–D23 (2019).
We thank T. Chen, Y. Liu and J. Wang at EHBIO Gene Technology (Beijing, China) for their help on the construction of the web server. This work was supported by grants from the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA24020104 to Y.B.), the Key Research Program of Frontier Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDB-SSW-SMC021 to Y.B.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772400 and 31761143017 to Y.B.; 31801945 to J.Z.; and 31701997 to X.G.) and the Chinese Academy of Sciences Youth Innovation Promotion Association (2020101 to J.Z.). This work was supported by the Max Planck Society (R.G.-O. and P.S.-L.), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) in the Priority Programme SPP 2125 DECRyPT (R.G.-O. and P.S.-L.) and under Germany’s Excellence Strategy–EXC-Number 2048/1–project 390686111 (R.G.-O. and P.S.-L.).
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review information Nature Protocols thanks Paul Dennis, Kiwamu Minamisawa and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Key references using this protocol
Zhang, J. et al. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 676–684 (2019): https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-019-0104-4
Huang, A. C. et al. Science 364, eaau6389 (2019): https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau6389
Bai, Y. et al. Nature 528, 364–369 (2015): https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16192
Primer sequences used for bacterial identification. 16S rRNA gene primers 799F and 1193R are in gray. Well and plate barcodes are in red and blue, respectively. Illumina adapters (P5 and Read1, P7, Index and Read2) are in gray.
Taxonomy and sequences of ASVs.
Read counts of ASVs in each well (ASV table).
Five best candidate wells corresponding to each ASV.
Data to generate anticipated results in Fig. 6.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J., Liu, YX., Guo, X. et al. High-throughput cultivation and identification of bacteria from the plant root microbiota. Nat Protoc 16, 988–1012 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-020-00444-7
Microbiome Modulation—Toward a Better Understanding of Plant Microbiome Response to Microbial Inoculants
Frontiers in Microbiology (2021)
Current Microbiology (2021)